Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Right-wedge accelerated clocks and rays — Examples

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

These symbolic examples specialize the page's conditional results: a pair of stationary Rindler clocks and a radial ray; a particle released from rest in a uniform electric field; a planar circular orbit in a uniform magnetic field; and the exact constant drift solution in subcritical crossed fields. Parameters are chosen for calculation and do not represent reported measurements. The instantaneous Rindler frequency ratio uses the theorem's additional adopted local phase-reception rule and retains its local ray-regime and finite-apparatus qualifications.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, postulates, theorems and proofs

None yet.

5 · Examples, experiments and counterexamples

ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedverified 2026-10-15 (gpt-6-luna, gpt-6.1-sol, and delegated Codex review/repair agents; see completed run evidence)Open item page →

Two stationary clocks and one radial Rindler ray

Physical scope

A symbolic specialization of the conditional right-wedge Rindler theorem. The numerical parameters are chosen model values, not measured quantities; the instantaneous received-frequency reading is conditional on the theorem's additional adopted local phase-reception model, with its local ray-regime and finite-apparatus qualifications and no numerical accuracy or empirical validation claim.

Example

Specialize Right-wedge Rindler clocks, radial rays and frequency ratio to a=2 m s−2, emission radius ρE=2 m, reception radius ρR=4 m, and a future outward radial ray. These are exact model parameters. The one-way coordinate travel time is (c/2 m s−2)log⁡2, and over a shared Rindler-time interval the ideal-clock ratio is ΔτR/ΔτE=2. The instantaneous received-frequency ratio is ωR/ωE=1/2 under the theorem's additional adopted local phase-reception rule, with its local ray-regime and short-observation qualifications for finite apparatus and no numerical error bound or empirical validation. No experiment is described.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The parameter values above and the right-wedge definitions and model readings of the theorem.

[F1]

Right-wedge Rindler clocks, radial rays and frequency ratio: radial travel has ΔT=(c/a)∣log⁡(ρR/ρE)∣, stationary ideal-clock increments scale as ρ, and the wave-covector contraction functional scales as 1/ρ; the instantaneous reception interpretation adopts the theorem's [A2] and retains all its qualifications.

Verification

1.1givenF1algebra

Substitute a=2 m s−2, ρR/ρE=2 into the theorem's travel-time formula. Since both radii are positive and the ray is outward, ΔT=(c/a)log⁡2=(c/2 m s−2)log⁡2, which is finite.

2.1step 1.1F1algebra∎

The clock-gradient formula gives ΔτR/ΔτE=ρR/ρE=4 m/(2 m)=2. The contraction functional gives ωR/ωE=ρE/ρR=1/2. By [F1], the latter is the instantaneous received-frequency ratio within the additional adopted local phase-reception model, with its local ray-regime and finite-apparatus limits; no measured accuracy is asserted.

ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedverified 2026-10-15 (gpt-6-luna, gpt-6.1-sol, and delegated Codex review/repair agents; see completed run evidence)Open item page →

Uniform electric field from rest

Physical scope

A symbolic specialization of the conditional constant-electric-field test-particle theorem with chosen SI model parameters. It is not a measurement or empirical claim.

Example

Choose m=1 kg, q=1 C, E0=2 N C−1, B=0, and initial data x0=0 m, p0=0 kg m s−1 at t=0 in Exact relativistic orbit in a uniform electric field. Coordinate time t is in seconds. Then F0=2 N, p1(t)=F0t, and for every finite t the model orbit is

x1(t)=cF0(m2c2+F02t2−mc),x2(t)=x3(t)=0,

with v1(t)=cF0t/m2c2+F02t2. This is a symbolic model calculation with chosen parameters, not a report of measured field or particle data.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The chosen m,q,E0, zero initial position and momentum, and the adopted model assumptions in the theorem.

[F1]

Exact relativistic orbit in a uniform electric field: for F0=qE0≠0, Π=m2c2+∣p⊥∣2, p1=p01+F0t, and the exact position and velocity are the formulas stated there.

Verification

1.1givenF1algebra

Here F0=qE0=(1 C)(2 N C−1)=2 N≠0, p01=0, p⊥=0, and Π=mc. Inserting these values into [F1] gives p1(t)=F0t, zero transverse coordinates, and the displayed x1(t).

2.1step 1.1F1algebra∎

Substitution in the velocity formula of [F1] gives v1=cF0t/m2c2+F02t2 and v2=v3=0. At t=0, x1=0 and v1=0; for finite t, ∣v1∣<c because the denominator is strictly larger than ∣F0t∣.

ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedverified 2026-10-15 (gpt-6-luna, gpt-6.1-sol, and delegated Codex review/repair agents; see completed run evidence)Open item page →

A circular magnetic orbit with zero axial momentum

Physical scope

A symbolic specialization of the conditional constant-magnetic-field test-particle theorem with chosen model parameters. It is not a measurement or empirical claim.

Example

In Exact relativistic helix in a uniform magnetic field, choose qB0>0, p01=p∗>0 with units kilogram metre per second, p02=p03=0, and arbitrary m>0 kilograms. Then S0=m2c2+p∗2 has momentum units, γ0=S0/(mc) is dimensionless and Ω=qB0/(γ0m)>0 has units inverse seconds. The orbit is the circle

x1=x01+cp∗S0Ωsin⁡(Ωt),x2=x02−cp∗S0Ω(1−cos⁡(Ωt)),x3=x03,

of radius p∗/(qB0), with constant energy cS0. At t=π/(2Ω) its momentum is (0,−p∗,0). All values are model parameters, not observations.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The parameter restrictions above and the adopted magnetic test-particle model in the theorem.

[F1]

Exact relativistic helix in a uniform magnetic field: the momentum and position formulas have signed angular frequency Ω=qB0/(γ0m), constant energy cS0, and transverse radius ∣p⊥∣/∣qB0∣.

Verification

1.1givenF1algebra

With p02=p03=0 and Ω>0, substitution into [F1] gives p1=p∗cos⁡(Ωt), p2=−p∗sin⁡(Ωt) and p3=0. Substitution into the position formulas gives the displayed coordinates and x3=x03.

2.1step 1.1F1algebra∎

The radius clause of [F1] gives ∣p⊥∣/∣qB0∣=p∗/(qB0), and the energy is cS0. At Ωt=π/2, sine is 1 and cosine is 0, so p=(0,−p∗,0). The orbit is planar because p03=0 makes x3 constant.

ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedverified 2026-10-15 (gpt-6-luna, gpt-6.1-sol, and delegated Codex review/repair agents; see completed run evidence)Open item page →

The exact constant drift solution in subcritical crossed fields

Physical scope

A symbolic specialization of the subcritical crossed-field theorem. The chosen field parameters describe an exact model solution and are not measured values; general initial data still give inverse-boosted magnetic orbits.

Example

Let B0>0 be in tesla and set E0=cB0/2 in newtons per coulomb, so E=E0e1, B=B0e3 is subcritical. In Subcritical crossed fields and exact drift-frame orbits, the drift velocity and boost factor are vd=−(c/2)e2 in metres per second and γd=2/3. The constant-velocity orbit x(t)=x0+vdt in a chart with x0=ct solves the adopted model for any m>0 and constant charge q: its Lorentz force vanishes. This is one exact solution; other initial data yield boosted magnetic orbits.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The chosen fields, positive B0, m>0, constant q, and the subcritical external-field model of the theorem.

[F1]

Subcritical crossed fields and exact drift-frame orbits: for ∣E0∣<c∣B0∣, vd=−(E0/B0)e2, γd=(1−∣vd∣2/c2)−1/2, and E+vd×B=0; general solutions are inverse boosts of magnetic orbits.

Verification

1.1givenF1algebra

The ratio E0/(cB0)=1/2 verifies the strict subcritical hypothesis. Substituting E0=cB0/2 in [F1] gives vd=−(c/2)e2 and γd=(1−1/4)−1/2=2/3.

2.1step 1.1F1algebra∎

Directly, vd×B=−(cB0/2)(e2×e3)=−(cB0/2)e1=−E. Thus [F1] makes the Lorentz force zero, momentum stays constant, and the straight worldline is an exact orbit. The theorem's inverse-boost construction applies to general initial data, so this example does not assert that every orbit has this constant velocity.

Sources