How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Smooth static spherical geometry and state domain — Examples
1 · Prerequisites
- Absolute and Conditional Convergence; Rearrangement; Products
- Binary Operations, Monoids, Groups and Subgroups
- Cm Math Balances
- Compactness
- Compactness in Metric Spaces
- Completeness, Completion, and Uniform Continuity
- Connectedness
- Connections And Free Fall
- Connections Levi Civita and Parallel Transport
- Construction of the Natural Numbers
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Cauchy Sequences
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Dedekind Cuts
- Continuity, IVT, EVT, and Uniform Continuity
- Cosets, Index and Lagrange's Theorem
- Countability and Uncountability
- Countability Axioms and Cardinal Functions
- Curvature And Tides
- Darboux, L'Hôpital, and Taylor's Theorem
- Determinants of Matrices over a Commutative Ring
- Divisibility, Euclidean Domains, Principal Ideal Domains and Unique Factorisation
- Dual Spaces, Bilinear and Quadratic Forms, and Sylvester's Law of Inertia
- Euclidean Ordinary Differential Equations with Smooth Dependence
- Filters and Ultrafilters
- Finite Counting, Factorials and Binomial Coefficients
- Foundations of the Real Numbers for Analysis
- Framework And Geometry
- Fubini and Change of Variables
- Geodesics, the Exponential Map, Completeness, and Hopf–Rinow
- Group Actions, Orbits, Stabilisers and Cayley's Theorem
- Hereditary and Productive Behaviour of the Separation Axioms
- Ideals, Quotient Rings and the Isomorphism Theorems for Rings
- Improper Integrals
- Inner Product Spaces, Gram-Schmidt, Projections and Adjoints
- Limits of Real Functions
- limsup, liminf, and Subsequential Limits
- Linear Independence, Bases and Dimension
- Linear Transformations, Rank-Nullity and Quotient Spaces
- Matrices, the Matrix of a Linear Map, and Change of Basis
- Metric Spaces
- Mixed Partials, Taylor Formulae, and Extrema
- Monotone Functions, Discontinuities, and Continuity Sets
- Monotone Sequences, Bolzano-Weierstrass, and Cauchy Completeness
- Normal Subgroups and Quotient Groups
- Normed and Banach Spaces
- Order, Zorn's Lemma, and the Axiom of Choice
- Ordered Composition
- Picard-Lindelöf and First-Order Ordinary Differential Equations
- Polynomial Rings, the Division Algorithm and Roots
- Power Series and Real-Analytic Functions
- Properties of the Integral and the Working FTC
- Rank Theorems and Embedded Submanifolds
- Relations, Functions, and Quotients
- Riemann Curvature and Riemannian Submanifolds
- Riemannian Metrics Length Distance and Volume
- Rings, Subrings, Integral Domains and Fields
- Rⁿ as a Normed Space; Vector-Valued Functions
- Roots, Rational Powers, and Classical Inequalities
- Separation Axioms: the Hierarchy
- Sequences and Limits
- Sequences and Series of Functions; Uniform Convergence
- Series: Convergence and the Nonnegative Tests
- Simple Field Extensions and the Construction of the Complex Numbers
- Smooth Manifolds and Smooth Maps
- Smooth Partitions of Unity and Exhaustions
- Smooth static spherical geometry and state domain
- Smooth Vector Bundles and Sections
- Spacetime Primitives
- Subspaces, Products, and Quotients
- Suprema and Infima
- Symmetric Groups, Cycle Decomposition and the Sign Homomorphism
- Tangent Cotangent and the Differential
- Tensor Fields Exterior Algebra and Differential Forms
- Tensors And Observers
- The Derivative and the Mean Value Theorems
- The Determinant of a Linear Operator, Cofactors and Cramer's Rule
- The Exponential Function
- The Fundamental Theorems of Calculus
- The Inverse and Implicit Function Theorems
- The Inverse Function Theorem Completed
- The Logarithm and General Powers
- The Riemann Integral in Rᵐ and Jordan Content
- The Riemann Integral: Definition and Integrability
- The Topology of Euclidean Space
- The Total Derivative in ℝᵐ → ℝⁿ
- The ZFC Axioms and the Basic Set Constructions
- Topological Spaces and Continuity
- Topology of ℝ
- Vector Fields Flows and Lie Derivatives
- Vector Spaces, Linear Subspaces, Span and Direct Sums
2 · Summary
These examples and counterexamples use only the mathematical definitions and results on tgr-mg02. Local regular-center central-pressure family instantiates local existence and continuous dependence with the smooth positive relation . Positive regular constant-density branch specializes the exact solution to and computes its positive center values.
Constant-density limiting center loses regularity shows that this branch has no finite-pressure, positive-lapse endpoint at . Constant-density profile has unequal pressures at equal energy density separates a static constant-density solution from a finite, single-valued barotropic transport law. The counterexample uses no fluid evolution equation and infers no observed signal speed.
3 · Logical flowchart
4 · Definitions, postulates, theorems and proofs
None yet.
5 · Examples, experiments and counterexamples
Local regular-center central-pressure family
Example
Let have units , let be dimensionless, and prescribe the smooth positive state relation for . Fix and let the central pressure range be . This is a mathematical equation-of-state example, not an observational stellar model.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The state relation, the compact interval , a fixed central lapse value , and inherited from The Axiom of Countable Choice ().
For every smooth positive on an open positive pressure interval and compact central pressure interval contained in it with a positive margin, Regular-center TOV local existence and dependence supplies a common , the unique integral-equation profiles in the stated pressure ball, a Cartesian center, continuous dependence on , and continuation only within a compact subset where , , and .
The geometric supplier chain uses exactly as defined in The Axiom of Countable Choice (), with no full Axiom of Choice.
Verification
The map is and positive on . Since , any gives the required closed pressure margin around inside .
Apply [F1] under [A1] with this and . There is one radius valid for every , and the corresponding solutions depend continuously on in the uniform norm; they satisfy , , and have positive lapse and .
Remarks
This is local existence and parameter dependence for the stated mathematical system. No surface at , global compactness bound, empirical equation of state, or dynamical stability conclusion follows.
Positive regular constant-density branch
Example
Fix and choose With and , the exact interior profile is
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The chosen and the exact-solution theorem Exact regular constant-density solution with verified matching, under of The Axiom of Countable Choice ().
For every with , Exact regular constant-density solution with verified matching verifies the interior and vacuum equations, regular center, matching, and central pressure formula .
The geometric supplier chain uses exactly as defined in The Axiom of Countable Choice (), with no full Axiom of Choice.
Verification
Substitution of the chosen gives and hence . Therefore [F1] applies to the displayed functions.
The central pressure ratio is and the central lapse is ; the surface pressure is and surface lapse is . The theorem gives the regular Cartesian center and no-layer matching to the vacuum exterior.
Remarks
The profile is an exact solution of the conditional equation system. This mathematical example is not an observed star and supplies no causal transport or stability law.
Constant-density limiting center loses regularity
Statement refuted
For a fixed energy density , vary the radius in the regular constant-density branch of Exact regular constant-density solution with verified matching, with . The claim that this fixed-density family extends to with finite central pressure and a positive central lapse is false.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The central pressure and lapse formulas of Exact regular constant-density solution with verified matching, with fixed and as in The Axiom of Countable Choice ().
On the branch , , , and (Exact regular constant-density solution with verified matching).
The sequence indexed by tends to zero, with its positive terms explicitly identified (Reciprocals of the positive integers decrease to zero).
Rational numbers are dense in ; in particular every interval with real contains a positive rational, by clause 1 of Both and are dense in , and every nonempty open subset of is uncountable.
The geometric supplier chain uses exactly as defined in The Axiom of Countable Choice (), with no full Axiom of Choice.
Counterexample
Fix . For integers , set and . With , direct substitution gives . Thus each supplies an admissible regular star of [F1], rather than varying at fixed radius. By [F2], after reindexing , . Set ; then For any real , [F3] gives rational with . By [F2], eventually , so . This proves directly from the convergence definition, including all rational positive error thresholds.
For , step 1.1 gives , so and . Hence . Given , apply [F3] to to choose a rational with ; by [F2], for all sufficiently large , , so . Also ; for any , apply [F3] to to choose rational with and apply [F2] to get eventually. Thus the central pressure diverges to and the central lapse tends to zero. At the denominator is exactly zero with positive numerator, so no finite central pressure or positive central lapse is obtained by extending these formulas.
Remarks
This refutes endpoint regularity for this explicit family only. It is not a proof of a compactness bound for other density profiles.
Constant-density profile has unequal pressures at equal energy density
Statement refuted
For this item, a differentiable barotropic pressure law is a map , where is an open interval of energy-density values containing , both input energy density and output pressure have units , and for each interior radius . The finite causal-slope criterion under consideration is for , so is dimensionless. For units only, set the formal parameter , with units ; this item assigns no fluid-dynamical meaning to it and makes no claim about an observed signal speed.
The claim refuted is that every regular static constant-density solution supplies such a map satisfying this slope criterion.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The exact constant-density branch of Exact regular constant-density solution with verified matching, under as in The Axiom of Countable Choice (). The slope bound is a stipulated mathematical condition on the candidate map ; no fluid evolution equation or empirical signal-speed interpretation is assumed.
On the branch of Exact regular constant-density solution with verified matching, , , , and for ; the interior energy density is . At , , , , and . Hence throughout the interior, and (Exact regular constant-density solution with verified matching).
The geometric supplier chain uses exactly as defined in The Axiom of Countable Choice (), with no full Axiom of Choice. The slope bound in the refuted claim is a stipulated mathematical criterion; no fluid evolution equation is assumed.
Counterexample
Choose . The center and the interior point both have energy density , while their pressures differ. By [F1], ; the denominators and are positive. Subtracting the exact pressure formulas gives so .
If a single-valued relation described this full static configuration, it would require both and , contradicting . Thus the static solution does not supply a single-valued map satisfying the stated relation, so no value of , finite sound-speed parameter, or causal bound can be inferred from this solution alone.
Remarks
The interior profile assigns the same energy density to every interior radius while the pressure varies. Thus pressure is not a single-valued function of energy density along this profile; this does not imply an infinite or superluminal signal speed.
Sources
- P.-H. Chavanis, Statistical mechanics of self-gravitating systems in general relativity: I. The quantum Fermi gas, arXiv:1908.10806v1 (2019), Sec. III.A, Eqs. (99)–(106)
- MIT 8.962, General Relativity, Spring 2020 Lecture Guide, Lecture 21, PDF pp. 7–8
- P.-H. Chavanis, Statistical mechanics of self-gravitating systems in general relativity: I. The quantum Fermi gas, arXiv:1908.10806v1 (2019), Sec. III.A, Eqs. (101)–(110)
- MIT 8.962, General Relativity, Spring 2020 Lecture Guide, Lecture 21, PDF pp. 8–9
- P.-H. Chavanis, Statistical mechanics of self-gravitating systems in general relativity: I. The quantum Fermi gas, arXiv:1908.10806v1 (2019), Sec. III.A, Eqs. (109)–(112)
- MIT 8.962, General Relativity, Spring 2020 Lecture Guide, Lecture 21, PDF p. 8