Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Smooth static spherical geometry and state domain — Examples

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

These examples and counterexamples use only the mathematical definitions and results on tgr-mg02. Local regular-center central-pressure family instantiates local existence and continuous dependence with the smooth positive relation ϵ(p)=ϵ0+λp. Positive regular constant-density branch specializes the exact solution to u=1/2 and computes its positive center values.

Constant-density limiting center loses regularity shows that this branch has no finite-pressure, positive-lapse endpoint at u=8/9. Constant-density profile has unequal pressures at equal energy density separates a static constant-density solution from a finite, single-valued barotropic transport law. The counterexample uses no fluid evolution equation and infers no observed signal speed.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, postulates, theorems and proofs

None yet.

5 · Examples, experiments and counterexamples

ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)Open item page →

Local regular-center central-pressure family

Example

Let ϵ0>0 have units J m−3, let λ≥0 be dimensionless, and prescribe the smooth positive state relation ϵ(p)=ϵ0+λp for p∈Ip=(0,∞). Fix 0<p1<p2 and let the central pressure range be Pc=[p1,p2]. This is a mathematical equation-of-state example, not an observational stellar model.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The state relation, the compact interval Pc, a fixed central lapse value ϕc, and ZF+ACω inherited from The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω).

[F1]

For every smooth positive ϵ(p) on an open positive pressure interval and compact central pressure interval contained in it with a positive margin, Regular-center TOV local existence and dependence supplies a common R0>0, the unique integral-equation profiles in the stated pressure ball, a C2 Cartesian center, continuous dependence on pc, and continuation only within a compact subset where r>0, p∈Ip, and b>0.

[A1]

The geometric supplier chain uses exactly ACω as defined in The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω), with no full Axiom of Choice.

Verification

1.1givenA1algebra

The map ϵ(p)=ϵ0+λp is C∞ and positive on Ip=(0,∞). Since p1>0, any 0<δ<p1 gives the required closed pressure margin around Pc inside Ip.

2.1A1F1step 1.1algebra∎

Apply [F1] under [A1] with this ϵ and Pc. There is one radius R0>0 valid for every pc∈[p1,p2], and the corresponding solutions depend continuously on pc in the uniform norm; they satisfy v(0)=K(ϵ0+λpc)/3, p′(0)=v′(0)=0, and have positive lapse and b≥1/2.

Remarks

This is local existence and parameter dependence for the stated mathematical system. No surface at p=0, global compactness bound, empirical equation of state, or dynamical stability conclusion follows.

ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-generatedOpen item page →

Positive regular constant-density branch

Example

Fix R>0 and choose ρ0=3c216πGR2,MR=4πρ0R33,u=2GMRc2R=12. With ϵ0=ρ0c2 and a=1/2, the exact interior profile is b(r)=1−r22R2,p(r)=ϵ01−r2/(2R2)−1/23/2−1−r2/(2R2),eϕ(r)=3/2−1−r2/(2R2)2.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The chosen R,ρ0,MR,u and the exact-solution theorem Exact regular constant-density solution with verified matching, under ZF+ACω of The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω).

[F1]

For every ρ0,R>0 with u=2GMR/(c2R)∈(0,8/9), Exact regular constant-density solution with verified matching verifies the interior and vacuum equations, regular center, matching, and central pressure formula ϵ0(1−a)/(3a−1).

[A1]

The geometric supplier chain uses exactly ACω as defined in The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω), with no full Axiom of Choice.

Verification

1.1givenA1F1algebra

Substitution of the chosen ρ0 gives MR=c2R/(4G) and hence u=1/2∈(0,8/9). Therefore [F1] applies to the displayed functions.

2.1A1F1step 1.1algebra∎

The central pressure ratio is p(0)ϵ0=1−1/23/2−1=22−17>0, and the central lapse is (3/2−1)/2>0; the surface pressure is p(R)=0 and surface lapse is 1/2. The theorem gives the regular Cartesian center and no-layer matching to the vacuum exterior.

Remarks

The profile is an exact solution of the conditional equation system. This mathematical example is not an observed star and supplies no causal transport or stability law.

CounterexampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-generatedOpen item page →

Constant-density limiting center loses regularity

Statement refuted

For a fixed energy density ϵ0>0, vary the radius R>0 in the regular constant-density branch of Exact regular constant-density solution with verified matching, with u=8πGϵ0R2/(3c4)∈(0,8/9). The claim that this fixed-density family extends to u=8/9 with finite central pressure and a positive central lapse is false.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The central pressure and lapse formulas of Exact regular constant-density solution with verified matching, with ϵ0>0 fixed and ZF+ACω as in The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω).

[F1]

On the branch 0<u<8/9, a=1−u>1/3, pc=ϵ0(1−a)/(3a−1), and eϕ(0)=(3a−1)/2 (Exact regular constant-density solution with verified matching).

[F2]

The sequence 1/(k+1) indexed by k∈N tends to zero, with its positive terms explicitly identified (Reciprocals of the positive integers decrease to zero).

[F3]

Rational numbers are dense in R; in particular every interval (0,η) with real η>0 contains a positive rational, by clause 1 of Both Q and R∖Q are dense in R, and every nonempty open subset of R is uncountable.

[A1]

The geometric supplier chain uses exactly ACω as defined in The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω), with no full Axiom of Choice.

Counterexample

1.1givenA1F1F2F3constructalgebra

Fix ρ0=ϵ0/c2>0. For integers n≥2, set un=8/9−1/n and Rn=c23un/(8πGϵ0)>0. With Mn=4πρ0Rn3/3, direct substitution gives 2GMn/(c2Rn)=8πGϵ0Rn2/(3c4)=un∈(0,8/9). Thus each (ρ0,Rn) supplies an admissible regular star of [F1], rather than varying u at fixed radius. By [F2], after reindexing k=n−1, 1/n=1/(k+1)→0. Set an=1−un=1/9+1/n>1/3; then 0<an−13=1/nan+1/3≤32n, For any real η>0, [F3] gives rational q with 0<q<2η/3. By [F2], eventually 1/n<q, so ∣an−1/3∣≤3/(2n)<3q/2<η. This proves an→1/3 directly from the convergence definition, including all rational positive error thresholds.

2.1A1F1F2F3step 1.1algebra∎

For n≥9, step 1.1 gives an≤1/2, so ϵ0(1−an)≥ϵ0/2 and 0<3an−1≤9/(2n). Hence pc(un)≥ϵ0n/9. Given M>0, apply [F3] to (0,ϵ0/(9M)) to choose a rational q>0 with q<ϵ0/(9M); by [F2], for all sufficiently large n, 1/n<q, so pc(un)>M. Also 0<eϕ(0)(un)=(3an−1)/2≤9/(4n); for any η>0, apply [F3] to (0,4η/9) to choose rational q>0 with q<4η/9 and apply [F2] to get eϕ(0)(un)<η eventually. Thus the central pressure diverges to +∞ and the central lapse tends to zero. At u=8/9 the denominator is exactly zero with positive numerator, so no finite central pressure or positive central lapse is obtained by extending these formulas.

Remarks

This refutes endpoint regularity for this explicit family only. It is not a proof of a compactness bound for other density profiles.

CounterexampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-generatedOpen item page →

Constant-density profile has unequal pressures at equal energy density

Statement refuted

For this item, a differentiable barotropic pressure law is a C1 map P:Jϵ→R, where Jϵ⊂(0,∞) is an open interval of energy-density values containing ϵ0, both input energy density and output pressure have units J m−3, and p(r)=P(ϵ(r)) for each interior radius 0≤r<R. The finite causal-slope criterion under consideration is 0≤P′(x)≤1 for x∈Jϵ, so P′ is dimensionless. For units only, set the formal parameter cs2:=c2P′(x), with units m2 s−2; this item assigns no fluid-dynamical meaning to it and makes no claim about an observed signal speed.

The claim refuted is that every regular static constant-density solution supplies such a map P satisfying this slope criterion.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The exact constant-density branch of Exact regular constant-density solution with verified matching, under ZF+ACω as in The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω). The slope bound is a stipulated mathematical condition on the candidate map P; no fluid evolution equation or empirical signal-speed interpretation is assumed.

[F1]

On the branch of Exact regular constant-density solution with verified matching, a=1−u, B(r)=1−ur2/R2, b(r)=B(r)2, and p(r)=ϵ0(B(r)−a)/(3a−B(r)) for 0≤r≤R; the interior energy density is ϵ0. At u=1/2, a=1/2, B(0)=1, B(R/2)=7/8, and a≤B(r)≤1. Hence 3a−B(r)≥3/2−1>0 throughout the interior, and p(0)=ϵ0(1−a)/(3a−1)>0 (Exact regular constant-density solution with verified matching).

[A1]

The geometric supplier chain uses exactly ACω as defined in The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω), with no full Axiom of Choice. The slope bound in the refuted claim is a stipulated mathematical criterion; no fluid evolution equation is assumed.

Counterexample

1.1A1F1constructalgebra

Choose u=1/2. The center and the interior point r=R/2 both have energy density ϵ0, while their pressures differ. By [F1], B(0)=1>B(R/2)=7/8>1/2=a; the denominators 3a−B(0) and 3a−B(R/2) are positive. Subtracting the exact pressure formulas gives p(0)−p(R/2)ϵ0=2a(B(0)−B(R/2))(3a−B(0))(3a−B(R/2))>0, so p(0)>p(R/2)>0.

2.1givenA1F1step 1.1contradiction∎

If a single-valued relation p=P(ϵ) described this full static configuration, it would require both P(ϵ0)=p(0) and P(ϵ0)=p(R/2), contradicting p(0)>p(R/2). Thus the static solution does not supply a single-valued map P satisfying the stated relation, so no value of P′(ϵ0), finite sound-speed parameter, or causal bound can be inferred from this solution alone.

Remarks

The interior profile assigns the same energy density ϵ0 to every interior radius while the pressure varies. Thus pressure is not a single-valued function of energy density along this profile; this does not imply an infinite or superluminal signal speed.

Sources