Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

✓ 3 results · all verified · 0 also independently AI-judged
Every result on this page is machine-checked by a proof checker and read in full by a delegated reviewing agent on the owner's instruction; the judge is an additional, independent cross-model AI review of the proofs. The 3 not AI-judged were verified by owner audit (typically over a confirmed judge false positive), not failures.

Minimax estimation over inverse source classes — Examples

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Logical flowchart

3 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

None yet.

4 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

Sobolev ellipsoid rates in polynomial and exponential spectra

Example

Assume Countable Choice, take Q>0 and Sobolev-type weights aj≍j in the Gaussian sequence inverse model. If the singular values satisfy sj≍j−1, the minimax RMS error is of order ϵ2/5 as ϵ↓0; if instead sj≍e−j, it is of order [log⁡(1/ϵ)]−1. The comparison constants may depend on the fixed ellipsoid and axis constants.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

Polynomial and exponential minimax estimation rates: For polynomial singular values and polynomial ellipsoid weights, R∗≍ϵκ/(κ+p+1/2); for exponential singular values and polynomial weights, R∗≍[log⁡(1/ϵ)]−κ.

[F2]

Gaussian sequence inverse model and Weighted ellipsoid class for sequence inversion: The model uses the positive singular sequence and the parameter class ∑jaj2θj2≤Q2.

[A1]

The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω): Countable Choice is inherited from the sequence model.

Given: Countable Choice, Q>0, p=κ=1, and either the polynomial or exponential singular-value regime in the Example.

Verification

1.1givenF1algebra

In the polynomial regime, p=1 and κ=1, so the first formula of [F1] has exponent 1/(1+1+1/2)=2/5.

1.2givenF1algebra

In the exponential regime, κ=1, so the second formula of [F1] is [log⁡(1/ϵ)]−1.

2.1A1step 1.1step 1.2F2algebra∎

By [A1], the Gaussian sequence model is interpreted with its stated Countable Choice prerequisite. The two substitutions give exactly the two stated RMS orders; Q and the asymptotic comparison constants affect only the multiplicative bounds.

ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

Analytic ellipsoid rates in polynomial and exponential spectra

Example

Assume Countable Choice, take Q>0 and analytic-type weights aj≍ej in the Gaussian sequence inverse model. If the singular values satisfy sj≍j−1, the minimax RMS error is of order ϵ[log⁡(1/ϵ)]3/2 as ϵ↓0; if instead sj≍e−j, it is of order ϵ1/2. The comparison constants may depend on the fixed ellipsoid and axis constants.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

Polynomial and exponential minimax estimation rates: For polynomial singular values and exponential ellipsoid weights, R∗≍ϵ[log⁡(1/ϵ)]p+1/2; for exponential singular values and exponential weights, R∗≍ϵκ/(p+κ).

[F2]

Gaussian sequence inverse model and Weighted ellipsoid class for sequence inversion: The model uses the positive singular sequence and the parameter class ∑jaj2θj2≤Q2.

[A1]

The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω): Countable Choice is inherited from the sequence model.

Given: Countable Choice, Q>0, p=κ=1, and either the polynomial or exponential singular-value regime in the Example.

Verification

1.1givenF1algebra

In the polynomial regime, p=κ=1, so the first formula of [F1] is ϵ[log⁡(1/ϵ)]1+1/2=ϵ[log⁡(1/ϵ)]3/2.

1.2givenF1algebra

In the exponential regime, the second formula of [F1] has exponent κ/(p+κ)=1/2, giving ϵ1/2.

2.1A1step 1.1step 1.2F2algebra∎

By [A1], the Gaussian sequence model is interpreted with its stated Countable Choice prerequisite. The two substitutions give exactly the two stated RMS orders; Q and the asymptotic comparison constants affect only the multiplicative bounds.

ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

First-order power-source rates in polynomial and exponential spectra

Example

Assume Countable Choice. Let X and Y be real Hilbert spaces, let K:X→Y be a compact operator of infinite rank, and write s1≥s2≥⋯>0, sj→0, for its positive singular values. Set Q=ρ>0 and ν=1. Over the minimum-norm power source ball X1,ρ(K) in the Gaussian sequence inverse model associated with this singular system, if sj≍j−1 then the minimax RMS error is of order ϵ2/5; if sj≍e−j then it is of order ϵ1/2 as ϵ↓0. The constants may depend on ρ and the fixed singular-value comparison constants.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

Power source balls are weighted statistical ellipsoids: Xν,ρ(K) has ellipsoid weights aj=sj−ν and radius Q=ρ.

[F2]

Polynomial and exponential minimax estimation rates: For polynomial singular values with polynomial axes, the rate is ϵκ/(κ+p+1/2); for exponential singular values with exponential axes, the rate is ϵκ/(p+κ).

[F3]

Power source ball and Gaussian sequence inverse model: The source class is Xν,ρ(K)={∣K∣νw:∥w∥X≤ρ} in the real Gaussian sequence inverse model.

[A1]

The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω): Countable Choice is inherited through the compact singular system.

Given: Countable Choice, real Hilbert spaces X,Y, a compact infinite-rank operator K:X→Y with positive singular values s1≥s2≥⋯>0 and sj→0, ρ>0, ν=1, and either sj≍j−1 or sj≍e−j.

Verification

1.1givenF1F2algebra

If sj≍j−1, [F1] gives aj=sj−1≍j, so the first formula of [F2] applies with p=κ=1 and gives ϵ2/5.

1.2givenF1F2algebra

If sj≍e−j, [F1] gives aj=sj−1≍ej, so the second formula of [F2] applies with p=κ=1 and gives ϵ1/2.

2.1givenA1F1F2F3step 1.1step 1.2algebra∎

By [A1], the compact singular-system coordinate model is interpreted with its stated Countable Choice prerequisite. Both substitutions use the exact coefficient ellipsoid from [F1] and preserve the stated radius ρ, so they yield the two source-ball rates in the Example.

Sources