Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Spherical electrovacuum mass and local rigidity — Examples

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, postulates, theorems and proofs

None yet.

5 · Examples, experiments and counterexamples

CounterexampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

Constant-radius Bertotti–Robinson data are outside areal-coordinate rigidity

Statement refuted

Every exact spherical Einstein–Maxwell–Λ datum is locally expressible in the charged Reissner–Nordström–(A)dS form with its areal radius r as a coordinate, without any restriction on dr.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The first Bertotti–Robinson product branch with parameter L>0, its sphere radius and electromagnetic two-form.

[F1]

Constant-radius Bertotti-Robinson product data defines the branch g=L2(−z2dτ2+z−2dz2+γS2), F=−L dτ∧dz, with sphere radius L.

[F2]

Product electrovacuum equations from full factor Ricci proves that every datum in Constant-radius Bertotti-Robinson product data, including this branch, satisfies the source-free geometric Einstein–Maxwell equations.

[F3]

Local charged Birkhoff rigidity away from critical areal gradients assumes dr≠0 and q−1(dr,dr)≠0 before using the areal radius as a coordinate.

[F4]

Dyonic Reissner-Nordström metric and field domains fixes the unit-sphere outward area form ωS2=sin⁡θ dθ∧dϕ.

[F5]

Spherical orbit geometry and rotational invariance defines the exact local SO(3)-action, the pullback action on tensor fields, and rotational invariance.

[F6]

Spherical electrovacuum quotient and charged mass defines the spherical Einstein–Maxwell–Λ datum, including the requirement that its smooth two-form be rotationally invariant; for Λ=0 its equations are exactly the geometric electrovac equations verified in [F2].

Counterexample

1.1F1F4F5algebra

On the branch f(z)=z2 of [F1], take U=Rτ×(0,∞)z, q=L2(−z2dτ2+z−2dz2), ϵ2=−L2dτ∧dz, future timelike field N=(Lz)−1∂τ, and constant r=L. This is a nonempty, connected, simply connected smooth Lorentzian orbit patch with the orientation, time orientation, and product metric of [F5]; its prescribed four-volume form is L4dτ∧dz∧ωS2, matching [F1]. For each R∈SO(3) the lift ρR(τ,z,p)=(τ,z,Rp) fixes the base two-form F=−L dτ∧dz, so ρR∗F=F; also R preserves the induced round metric. Thus the field and metric satisfy the rotational-invariance and warped-product clauses in [F5] and [F6]. Each symmetry sphere has induced metric L2γS2 and area L2∫0π∫02πsin⁡θ dϕ dθ=4πL2 by [F4]. Its areal radius is therefore the constant scalar r=L, so dr=0 throughout the product patch. A function whose differential vanishes cannot serve as a coordinate in a chart, because the differential of every coordinate function is nonzero.

2.1F2F3F5F6step 1.1algebra∎

By [F2], [F5], [F6], and step 1.1 this is an exact spherical Einstein–Maxwell datum with Λ=0, yet it does not admit its areal radius as a coordinate. It therefore refutes the unrestricted claim: the Reissner–Nordström–(A)dS areal-coordinate form needs a nonzero areal-radius gradient. This example is excluded by [F3] and makes no claim about whether other coordinates or limiting relations connect the two geometries.

Sources