Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Specified bosonic scalar and CAR Dirac model adoption — Examples

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

Boson occupation ladder and fermion one-mode exclusion calculates bosonic occupation and fermionic one-mode exclusion for normalizable wave-packet modes in the selected free-field representations. It also constructs a normalized bosonic Fock vector outside the maximal annihilation-operator domain. These are conditional algebraic model results, not observed data or a general spin-statistics theorem.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, postulates, theorems and proofs

ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedverified 2026-10-15 (gpt-6-luna, gpt-6.1-sol, and delegated Codex review/repair agents; see completed run evidence)Open item page →

Boson occupation ladder and fermion one-mode exclusion

Physical scope

A conditional algebraic example in the selected free scalar bosonic and Dirac CAR Fock models. It includes a bosonic Fock vector outside one annihilation-operator domain and a one-mode fermion occupation calculation; it reports no experimental outcome.

Example

Choose a unit scalar wave-packet mode h and a unit Dirac particle or antiparticle mode u. The states and operators below are those of the conditional model theorem CCR/CAR and particle occupations in adopted free models.

For the bosonic mode, let ∣n⟩h be the normalized n-occupation vector. We also construct a normalized Fock vector whose annihilation image is not square-summable, so the maximal annihilation operator is not defined on every Fock vector.

For the fermionic mode, the one-particle vector c†(u)ΩD has unit norm, while two creations in that same mode vanish. This calculation concerns one normalized CAR mode in the adopted representation; it is not a general spin-statistics argument.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice [A1], the scalar mode conclusion [F1], the CAR and exact annihilation domain [F2], and the Fock-sector definitions [F3]. The modes h and u are supplied unit vectors.

[A1]

The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω) states ACω: every at most countable family of nonempty sets has a choice function.

[F1]

CCR/CAR and particle occupations in adopted free models proves that for each unit scalar mode h, ∣n⟩h=(a†(h))nΩs/n! is normalized and satisfies the bosonic ladder.

[F2]

Bosonic and fermionic Fock operators with exact domains gives the CAR c(u)c†(u)+c†(u)c(u)=I and c†(u)2=0 for a unit mode, and states that both operators are bounded on the whole Fock space.

[F3]

Schwartz/distribution spaces and Hilbert Fock conventions defines the vacuum as Ω=(1,0,0,…), states c(u)Ω=0, and gives the sector insertion and contraction formulas. The finite-particle domain is dense.

[F4]

Bosonic and fermionic Fock operators with exact domains states the exact maximal annihilation domain D(a(h))={Ψ=(Ψn):∑n≥1∥an(h)Ψn∥2<∞}.

Verification

Given: [A1], [F1]–[F4], and the chosen normalized modes h and u.

1.1A1F1constructalgebra

Let S2=∑k=1∞k−2. For each j≥0, the block 2j≤k<2j+1 contains 2j terms, each at most 2−2j, so its sum is at most 2−j. Summing these geometric bounds proves 1≤S2<∞. Therefore C=S2−1/2 is a positive finite constant, and the orthonormal bosonic mode states from [F1] give Ψ=∑n=0∞C(n+1)−1∣n⟩h with ∥Ψ∥2=C2S2=1.

1.2F2F3algebra

For ξn in the nth antisymmetric sector and ηn+1 in the next sector, the insertion formula, Pa,n+1ηn+1=ηn+1, and self-adjointness of this orthogonal projection give ⟨cn†(u)ξn,ηn+1⟩2=n+1⟨u⊗ξn,ηn+1⟩2=⟨ξn,n+1(Cu⊗I⊗n)ηn+1⟩2=⟨ξn,cn+1(u)ηn+1⟩2 by the tensor product pairing and contraction formula in [F3]. Summing over finite-sector vectors proves ⟨c†(u)ξ,η⟩2=⟨ξ,c(u)η⟩2 there. Boundedness in [F2] and density in [F3] extend this identity to the full Fock space, so c†(u)=c(u)∗. The CAR, vacuum relation, and nilpotence in [F2]–[F3] then give ∥c†(u)ΩD∥2=⟨ΩD,c(u)c†(u)ΩD⟩2=⟨ΩD,(I−c†(u)c(u))ΩD⟩2=1. Thus the one-mode state is normalized and a second creation in that mode is zero.

2.1A1F1F4step 1.1algebra

By the ladder in [F1], the squared norm of the annihilation-sector sequence for this vector is C2∑n=1∞n/(n+1)2. Since n+1≤2n for n≥1, n/(n+1)2≥1/(4n). Each dyadic block 2j≤n<2j+1 contributes at least 1/2 to the harmonic series, so ∑n≥11/n diverges and therefore ∑n≥1n/(n+1)2=∞. By [F1], the annihilation images of the different particle sectors lie in orthogonal sectors, so this is exactly ∑n≥1∥an(h)Ψn∥2. The exact domain in [F4] now gives Ψ∉D(a(h)), despite Ψ being a normalized Fock vector.

3.1F2F3step 1.2algebra∎

The adjoint identity and CAR in [F2] give Nu∗=Nu and Nu2=c†(u)(I−c†(u)c(u))c(u)=Nu, so Nu is a projection. The vacuum relation gives NuΩD=0, while Nuc†(u)ΩD=c†(u)ΩD. Thus its eigenvalues on the one-mode subspace are 0 and 1. These are conditional model-state calculations, not measured outcomes.

5 · Examples, experiments and counterexamples

None yet.

Sources