Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Separate entropy-only radiation state maps — Examples

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

The example verifies an exact underdamped periodic Cattaneo mode by direct substitution. It is a mathematical solution of the stated linear subsystem, not a reported measurement or claim about a material.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, postulates, theorems and proofs

None yet.

5 · Examples, experiments and counterexamples

ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)Open item page →

Damped Cattaneo Fourier mode

Example

Choose C,κ,τ,T0,L>0 and an integer n≥1. Set k:=2πn/L and assume k2>C/(4τκ). Let Θ∈R with 0<∣Θ∣<T0 and

ω:=κk2Cτ−14τ2,ϕ(t):=Θe−t/(2τ)cos⁡(ωt).

On TL3, let e1=(1,0,0) be the first standard basis vector of R3 and define

θ(t,x):=ϕ(t)cos⁡(kx1),q(t,x):=−Ckϕ′(t)sin⁡(kx1)e1.

This is a nonzero, smooth, spatially periodic solution for every t∈R of the linear Cattaneo subsystem

Cθt+div⁡q=0,τqt+q=−κ∇θ.

Under the conventional SI interpretation of [F1], L is measured in m, k in m−1, ω in s−1, and Θ,ϕ,θ,T0 in K; the units of C,κ,τ,q are those stated in [F1]. These unit labels do not assert a material realization.

For t≥0, the proxy field T0+θ remains positive, and its oscillation envelope decays as e−t/(2τ). The physical-temperature interpretation is limited to the interval where T0+θ>0.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The positive parameters, integer n, wave number k, strict underdamping condition, and real amplitude Θ with 0<∣Θ∣<T0 in the Example.

[F1]

Fixed-coefficient Cattaneo entropy and propagation defines the fixed-coefficient Cattaneo system and its effective entropy and quadratic Lyapunov identities. The current carrier is draft; the explicit mode below is checked directly against the displayed PDE.

Verification

1.1givenalgebra

The strict inequality makes ω>0, and ϕ(t)=Re⁡(Θe(−1/(2τ)+iω)t) solves τϕ′′+ϕ′+(κk2/C)ϕ=0, since −1/(2τ)±iω are the roots of τλ2+λ+κk2/C=0.

2.1givenstep 1.1algebra

Differentiating q in x1 gives div⁡q=−Cϕ′(t)cos⁡(kx1), so Cθt+div⁡q=0. Also τqt+q=−Ck(τϕ′′+ϕ′)sin⁡(kx1)e1=κkϕsin⁡(kx1)e1=−κ∇θ, where step 1.1 supplies the second equality and ∇θ=−kϕsin⁡(kx1)e1. Thus both PDE hold.

3.1givenF1step 2.1∎

The fields are smooth and periodic because k=2πn/L and ϕ is smooth; Θ≠0 makes the mode nonzero. For t≥0, ∣θ(t,x)∣≤∣Θ∣e−t/(2τ)<T0, so T0+θ>0. The mode's amplitude decays with the displayed exponential envelope. The entropy-production and Lyapunov identities are the exact identities of [F1], applied to this verified solution.

Sources