Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Cm Math Dynamics — Examples

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

The companion page to cm-math-dynamics records explicit worked checks and one counterexample for its flow, shift, dichotomy and modal results. Everything here is mathematics: the examples carry domain: mathematics, depend only on the mathematical items of the parent page and on mathematical suppliers, and make no physical or empirical claim.

The flow and variational equation of a linear system: Phi(t,a)=e^{tA}a solves the linear field F(x)=Ax in closed form: Φ(t,a)=etAa on Ω=R×Rn, the composition law, and the variational equation Y′=AY with Y(t)=etA. Two coupled equal masses: mode frequencies sqrt(k/m) and sqrt((k+2c)/m), and the free zero mode when k=0 computes the modes of two coupled equal masses, with frequencies k/m and (k+2c)/m and the free affine zero mode when k=0; The local first-return map of a scalar harmonic oscillator near (1,0) is the reflection x->-x computes the local first-return map of the scalar harmonic oscillator near (1,0) on the section y=0 as the reflection P(x,0)=(−x,0), with image near (−1,0) and the stationary origin excluded. Explicit mixing, periodic and sensitivity checks in the bilateral shift evaluates the shift metric, a periodic point in a prescribed cylinder, a sensitivity witness and a mixing computation with the explicit threshold N=2. Computed dichotomy constants for a Jordan block and for a diagonal sink-source computes the dichotomy constants C=1, c=1/2 for a non-diagonalisable Jordan block and C=1, c=1/4 for a diagonal sink-source. A non-hyperbolic equilibrium with no positive eigenvalue can still be unstable: x'=x^3 is the counterexample x′=x3: the linearisation vanishes at the equilibrium and the equilibrium is unstable, so a zero-real-part eigenvalue cannot replace the hyperbolicity hypotheses of the dichotomy theorems.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, postulates, theorems and proofs

None yet.

5 · Examples, experiments and counterexamples

ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passOpen item page →

The flow and variational equation of a linear system: Phi(t,a)=e^{tA}a

Example

Let n≥1 and let A∈Mn(R). Consider the linear autonomous field F:Rn→Rn, F(x)=Ax, with local flow Φ:Ω→Rn (The local flow of an autonomous first-order system) and exponential series etA=∑m≥0tmm!Am (The exponential series of a bounded operator). Then

Ω=R×Rn,Φ(t,a)=etAa,

the exponential family satisfies the composition law e(s+t)A=esAetA, and for every a the derivative of b↦Φ(t,b) at a is DaΦ(t,a)=etA; the variational equation along t↦etAa,

Y′=AY,Y(0)=In,

has the unique solution Y(t)=etA on every compact interval (The variational equation along an ODE solution, Linear matrix ODEs have unique global solutions on a fixed interval).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: n≥1, a matrix A∈Mn(R) and the linear field F(x)=Ax. Coordinates are zero-based; a matrix acts on a column vector by (Ax)i=∑j<nAijxj. Vector norms are Euclidean (The Euclidean inner product ⟨x,y⟩=∑k<nxkyk on Rn), and ∥A∥ is the subordinate Euclidean operator norm (The operator norm as the least bound and as the unit-sphere or unit-ball supremum).

[F1]

Euclidean Rn is complete (R and Rn for n≥1 with the Euclidean metric are complete, componentwise from the Cauchy criterion in R). Rowwise Cauchy-Schwarz gives ∥Ax∥22≤(∑i,j<nAij2)∥x∥22, so A is bounded and F is globally Lipschitz (Cauchy-Schwarz ∣⟨x,y⟩∣≤∥x∥2∥y∥2 with its equality case, the triangle inequality for ∥⋅∥2, the parallelogram law and polarisation). The exponential series defines a C∞ group t↦etA with ddtetA=AetA=etAA, e0=In and e(s+t)A=esAetA (The exponential series of a bounded operator, Rectangular matrix multiplication and the identity matrix In, including zero-sized shapes).

[F3]

The variational equation along a solution x of an autonomous C1 field is the linear matrix ODE Y′=DF(x(t))Y; for the linear field it is Y′=AY, and it has a unique solution on every compact interval for every prescribed initial matrix at a time in that interval (The variational equation along an ODE solution, Linear matrix ODEs have unique global solutions on a fixed interval). For a0∈Rn, R,T>0, M:=sup⁡B‾(a0,R)∥Ax∥2 and 0<ρ<R−MT, the smooth-dependence theorem identifies DaΦ(t,a)h with Ya(t)h for a∈B(a0,ρ) and t∈[0,T], with the derivative bound L=∥A∥ and the trapping bound ∥Φ(t,a)−a0∥2≤ρ+Mt<R (C¹ dependence of an autonomous flow on the initial condition, and the variational equation).

Verification

technique · direct; verify the explicit solution, its maximality and the derivative identity
1.1givenF1F2

For fixed a, the curve x(t):=etAa is defined on all of R and satisfies x′(t)=AetAa=Ax(t) and x(0)=a by [F1]. Hence it is a solution of the initial value problem on R, and by [F2] it is the unique maximal solution through (0,a); therefore Ia=R and Φ(t,a)=x(t;a)=etAa for every t∈R. As a was arbitrary, Ω=R×Rn.

2.1step 1.1F1algebra

For fixed t, the map b↦Φ(t,b)=etAb is linear, and its derivative at every point is itself: Φ(t,a+h)−Φ(t,a)−etAh=0, so DaΦ(t,a)=etA with zero remainder; this holds for every real t.

2.2step 1.1F1

The composition law for the flow follows from [F1]: Φ(s+t,a)=e(s+t)Aa=esAetAa=Φ(s,Φ(t,a)), in agreement with the general identity of The local flow is a partial one-parameter group: identity, composition and inverse-time laws.

3.1step 1.12.1F1F3∎

The function Y(t):=etA satisfies Y′(t)=AY(t) and Y(0)=In by [F1]; by the uniqueness clause of [F3] it is the unique solution of the variational initial value problem on every compact interval containing 0, and every compact interval is contained together with 0 in one such interval. In particular the conclusion of the smooth-dependence theorem for the derivative of a↦Φ(t,a) is achieved exactly, with no error term.

Remarks

ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passOpen item page →

Two coupled equal masses: mode frequencies sqrt(k/m) and sqrt((k+2c)/m), and the free zero mode when k=0

Example

Let m>0, k≥0 and c≥0, and consider the constant-coefficient system Mq′′+Kq=0 on R2 with

M=(m00m),K=(k+c−c−ck+c).

Then K is symmetric and non-negative, S=M−1/2KM−1/2=K/m has eigenvalues λ1=k/m with eigenvector 12(1,1) and λ2=(k+2c)/m with eigenvector 12(1,−1), and the general solution is the sum of the modal solutions of Decoupling of the constant-coefficient quadratic system Mq′′+Kq=0 into normal modes, with the zero-mode and energy identities:

  • if k>0 the first mode oscillates with angular frequency ω1=k/m, while if k=0 it is the free affine mode a1+b1t along 12(1,1);
  • the second mode oscillates with angular frequency ω2=(k+2c)/m whenever k+2c>0, and if k=c=0 it is also a free affine mode a2+b2t along 12(1,−1).

In particular a zero eigenvalue is not an oscillator but a free mode.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The numbers m>0, k≥0, c≥0, the matrices M=mI2 and K displayed above, and the vectors w1=12(1,1), w2=12(1,−1).

[L1]

The quadratic-mode theorem applies to M symmetric positive definite and K symmetric non-negative, produces the eigenvalues and modes of S=M−1/2KM−1/2, and gives the general solution and the modal energies (Decoupling of the constant-coefficient quadratic system Mq′′+Kq=0 into normal modes, with the zero-mode and energy identities).

Verification

technique · direct; multiply the explicit matrices and apply the theorem
1.1givenL2algebra

S=M−1/2KM−1/2=K/m, and Sw1=1m(k+c−c−ck+c)12(11)=121m(kk)=kmw1, Sw2=1m(k+c−c−ck+c)12(1−1)=121m(k+2c−(k+2c))=k+2cmw2. Since w1,w2 are orthonormal, O=(w1 w2) is orthogonal and diagonalises S with the displayed eigenvalues; the eigenvalues are non-negative, λ1=k/m>0 exactly when k>0, and λ2=(k+2c)/m>0 exactly when k+2c>0.

2.1step 1.1L1

By [L1] the general solution is q=M−1/2Oz, where each modal coordinate is given by the theorem according to the sign of its eigenvalue: if k>0 then z1=a1cos⁡(ω1t)+b1sin⁡(ω1t) with ω1=λ1, and if k=0 then z1=a1+b1t; if k+2c>0 then z2=a2cos⁡(ω2t)+b2sin⁡(ω2t) with ω2=λ2, and if k=c=0 then z2=a2+b2t. The modal energies are constant. The verification of the scalar solution formulas is the one given by the theorem via The derivatives of sine and cosine are cosine and minus sine.

3.1step 1.1L1algebra∎

The zero-mode branch k=0: then λ1=0 and the first modal solution is the affine motion a1+b1t along w1 by [L1], which is unbounded unless b1=0; the second eigenvalue is 2c/m≥0, with 2c/m>0 when c>0, so the second mode oscillates with frequency 2c/m unless also c=0, in which case both modes are affine. Thus when k=0<c the only free direction is 12(1,1), while when k=c=0 both independent directions are free; in either case a zero mode is not an oscillator.

Remarks

ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passOpen item page →

The local first-return map of a scalar harmonic oscillator near (1,0) is the reflection x->-x

Example

Let ω>0 and let F:R2→R2, F(x,y)=(y,−ω2x), be the phase-plane field of the scalar harmonic oscillator x′′+ω2x=0, with y=x′, with local flow Φ (The local flow of an autonomous first-order system). Its solutions are

Φ(t,(x,y))=(xcos⁡ωt+yωsin⁡ωt, −ωxsin⁡ωt+ycos⁡ωt),

defined for all real t. Take the section Σ={y=0}, the reference point x0=(1,0) with h(x,y):=y, and t0:=π/ω, so that x1=Φ(t0,x0)=(−1,0). Then h(x0)=h(x1)=0 and

Dh(x0)F(x0)=−ω2≠0,Dh(x1)F(x1)=ω2≠0,

and Φ(s,x0) has second coordinate −ωsin⁡(ωs)≠0 for 0<s<π/ω, so it avoids the closed section on that interval. Thus the first-return clause of A transversal return of a C¹ flow yields a local C¹ Poincaré map, with inverse given by the reversed crossing applies and produces a local C1 Poincaré map near x0. On the section itself the map and its inverse can be computed exactly: for (x,0) with x near 1, the return time is τ(x,0)=π/ω and the return map is

P(x,0)=(−x,0),

the reflection in the origin restricted to the section, with inverse Q(y,0)=(−y,0); this is a C1 diffeomorphism between neighbourhoods of (1,0) and (−1,0) in Σ.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The frequency ω>0, the field F(x,y)=(y,−ω2x), the section Σ={y=0}, the points x0=(1,0), x1=(−1,0), and the function h(x,y)=y.

[L1]

The derivative formulas (sin⁡)′=cos⁡, (cos⁡)′=−sin⁡ and initial values sin⁡0=0, cos⁡0=1 hold (The derivatives of sine and cosine are cosine and minus sine, Sine and cosine defined by their real power series); vector-valued derivatives are computed componentwise (The derivative and the Riemann integral of a vector-valued function: an intrinsic derivative and a componentwise integral). The linear field F is globally Lipschitz: its Euclidean norm satisfies ∥F(z)−F(w)∥2≤max⁡(1,ω2)∥z−w∥2. Hence each initial datum has a unique maximal solution, and any solution through it is a restriction of that solution (The local flow of an autonomous first-order system).

[L2]

The return-map proposition applies under the two displayed transversality conditions, and its first-return clause applies when the open reference segment avoids the closure of the section and gives a local C1 diffeomorphism with inverse given by the reversed crossing (A transversal return of a C¹ flow yields a local C¹ Poincaré map, with inverse given by the reversed crossing).

[L3]

The zero set of sine is {kπ:k∈Z}, and sine has period 2π (The zero sets of sine and cosine and the least positive common period 2 pi); moreover sin⁡π=0 and cos⁡π=−1 (Quarter-turn values and shifts by pi/2 and pi).

Verification

technique · direct; verify the explicit solution, the crossings and the restriction of the return map to the section
1.1givenL1

Differentiating the two components of the displayed curve with respect to t using (sin⁡)′=cos⁡, (cos⁡)′=−sin⁡ gives (−ωxsin⁡ωt+ycos⁡ωt, −ω2xcos⁡ωt−ωysin⁡ωt), whose first component is the second component of the curve and whose second component is −ω2 times the first; hence the curve solves the phase system z′=F(z) and takes the value (x,y) at t=0. It is defined on all of R, so [L1] makes it the unique maximal solution and gives Ω=R×R2.

2.1step 1.1L1L3algebra

For x≠0 on the section, Φ(t,(x,0))=(xcos⁡ωt,−ωxsin⁡ωt): the second component vanishes exactly when sin⁡ωt=0, i.e. at t=kπ/ω, k∈Z, by [L3]. For x>0 the first positive time at which the orbit meets Σ is t=π/ω, with Φ(π/ω,(x,0))=(−x,0); therefore τ(x,0)=π/ω and P(x,0)=(−x,0) for every x>0 close to 1.

3.1step 1.12.1L2L3

The transversality conditions: with h(x,y)=y we have Dh=(0,1), F(x0)=(0,−ω2) and F(x1)=(0,ω2), so Dh(x0)F(x0)=−ω2≠0 and Dh(x1)F(x1)=ω2≠0. By step 2.1 and [L3] the open reference segment has no hit of the closed section Σ, which verifies the extra exclusion condition of [L2]. Hence [L2] applies at the reference data (t0,x0)=(π/ω,(1,0)), and its conclusion is realized by the explicit map of step 2.1: P maps a neighbourhood of (1,0) in Σ onto a neighbourhood of (−1,0) in Σ, and Q(y,0)=(−y,0) inverts it.

4.1step 3.1L2algebra∎

Finally the map x↦−x is a C1 diffeomorphism of R onto itself, so its restriction to the section is a C1 diffeomorphism between the stated neighbourhoods; this agrees with the general conclusion of the proposition and shows that the local inverse is again given by the reversed crossing, since the same computation with x<0 runs the reference orbit backwards.

Remarks

  • The example is the simplest case in which the local Poincaré map can be written in closed form. The proposition's hypothesis that the section be transversal at both crossings is visible in the computation: at the crossing the velocity is purely vertical, with Dh⋅F=∓ω2≠0.

  • The return map is computed on the section only; the general map τ(x,y) for points off the section is a C1 function near (1,0) by the proposition, but its explicit formula is not needed here. No stability or periodicity of the map is asserted: the reflection is an involution, and every point of the reference orbit is periodic for the flow with period 2π/ω.

  • At (0,0) the displayed flow is stationary. Every positive time is a hitting time of Σ, so there is no least positive hitting time and hence no first-return map there. The asserted local map is near (1,0), with its image near (−1,0).

ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passOpen item page →

Explicit mixing, periodic and sensitivity checks in the bilateral shift

Example

Let X={0,1}Z with the metric d and the shift σ of The bilateral two-symbol shift space, its metric, its shift map and its cylinder sets, and let cylinders be written [w]p,q.

  1. A metric computation. Let x∈X be arbitrary and let y agree with x on the coordinates −2,…,2 and differ at coordinate 3 only. Then y∈[x]−2,2 and d(x,y)=2−3=1/8, which is at most 21−2=1/2, in accordance with [x]Fm⊆B‾(x,21−m).
  2. A periodic point in a prescribed cylinder. The word (1,0,1) on the coordinates −1,0,1 extends to the 3-periodic sequence s with s−1=1, s0=0, s1=1 and sk+3=sk for all k. Then s∈[1,0,1]−1,1 and σ3(s)=s.
  3. A sensitivity witness. For every x∈X and every k≥1, let y agree with x except at coordinate k, where yk=1−xk. Then d(x,y)=2−k and d(σk(x),σk(y))≥1.
  4. A mixing computation. For the cylinders U=[1,0]0,1 and V=[0]−1,−1, one has σn(U)∩V≠∅ for every n≥2.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The shift space (X,d), the shift σ and the cylinder notation.

[L1]

A cylinder [w]p,q is the set of sequences with prescribed finite block; d is a metric; and σn(x)k=xk+n (The bilateral two-symbol shift space, its metric, its shift map and its cylinder sets, The bilateral shift metric is a metric, cylinders are its basic balls, and the shift space is sequentially compact).

Verification

technique · direct; evaluate the definitions on the explicit sequences
1.1givenL1algebra

Since yj=xj for ∣j∣≤2, every term of d(x,y) with ∣j∣≤2 vanishes; the only nonzero term is the one with j=3, equal to 2−3∣x3−y3∣=2−3. Hence d(x,y)=1/8≤21−2, which illustrates the second inclusion of The bilateral shift metric is a metric, cylinders are its basic balls, and the shift space is sequentially compact on a concrete pair.

1.2givenL1L2algebra

The displayed sequence s is well defined because the prescription is periodic, it lies in the cylinder [1,0,1]−1,1 by construction, and σ3(s)k=sk+3=sk for every k, so σ3(s)=s; thus s is a periodic point of σ and it lies in the prescribed cylinder, illustrating clause 3 of [L2] on an explicit block.

1.3givenL1L2algebra

For y as in item 3, exactly one term of the defining sum of d(x,y) is nonzero, so d(x,y)=2−k. Moreover σk(x)0=xk≠yk=σk(y)0, so the term with j=0 in the sum for d(σk(x),σk(y)) equals 1 and all terms are nonnegative; hence d(σk(x),σk(y))≥1. This realizes the sensitivity constant 1 of [L2] with the pair (x,y).

2.1givenL1L2algebra∎

Compute σn(U)={z:z−n=1, z1−n=0} and V={z:z−1=0}; the intersection is nonempty exactly when the three coordinate prescriptions are consistent, which they are as soon as no two of the coordinates −n, 1−n, −1 coincide with conflicting values. For n=1 the prescriptions are z−1=1 and z−1=0, a contradiction, so σ(U)∩V=∅. For n≥2: if n=2 the coordinates are −2,−1,−1 and the prescriptions are z−2=1, z−1=0, consistent; if n≥3 the three coordinates are distinct, so a sequence with the prescribed values exists. Hence σn(U)∩V≠∅ for every n≥2, as claimed, and the mixing condition of [L2] holds on this pair of basic open sets with N=2.

Remarks

  • Item 4 is a finite check of the "all sufficiently large n" quantifier: the intersection fails at n=1 but succeeds for every n≥2. This is exactly the distinction between mixing and the weaker open-set transitivity, and no uniformity over all pairs of cylinders is claimed by the computation.

  • The example uses no measure on X; the statements verified are the topological ones of Topological mixing, dense periodic points, sensitive dependence, and the stated chaos list.

ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passOpen item page →

Computed dichotomy constants for a Jordan block and for a diagonal sink-source

Example

Use zero-based coordinates and the standard vectors e0=(1,0) and e1=(0,1) of R2.

  1. A non-diagonalisable Jordan block. For

A=(−110−1)

the exponential series gives etA=e−t(1t01); the only eigenvalue is −1, so the dichotomy theorem has Es=R2, Eu={0}, and the constants C=1, c=1/2 are admissible: for every v∈R2 and t≥0,

∥etAv∥2≤e−t/2∥v∥2.

  1. A diagonal sink-source. For B=diag⁡(1/2,−3/2) the vectors e0,e1 are eigenvectors with eigenvalues 1/2 and −3/2, which have nonzero real part, and the dichotomy theorem gives Eu=Re0, Es=Re1 with admissible constants C=1, c=1/4: for t≥0 one has ∥etBe1∥2=e−3t/2≤e−t/4 and ∥etBe0∥2=et/2≥et/4, and for t≤0 one has ∥etBe0∥2=et/2≤et/4.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The matrices A=(−110−1) and B=diag⁡(1/2,−3/2), and the Euclidean norm on R2 (The Euclidean inner product ⟨x,y⟩=∑k<nxkyk on Rn).

[L1]

Euclidean Rn is complete (R and Rn for n≥1 with the Euclidean metric are complete, componentwise from the Cauchy criterion in R), and a finite matrix is bounded: Cauchy-Schwarz row by row gives ∥Av∥22≤(∑i,j<nAij2)∥v∥22 (Cauchy-Schwarz ∣⟨x,y⟩∣≤∥x∥2∥y∥2 with its equality case, the triangle inequality for ∥⋅∥2, the parallelogram law and polarisation). For A∈Mn(R) the exponential series defines E(t)=etA with E(0)=In and ddtE(t)=AE(t)=E(t)A for all real t (The exponential series of a bounded operator, Rectangular matrix multiplication and the identity matrix In, including zero-sized shapes).

[L2]

For a fixed matrix C∈Mn(R) the initial value problem Y′=CY, Y(0)=In has a unique solution on every compact interval containing 0, so a differentiable matrix curve satisfying these two conditions on R equals etC: apply uniqueness on [−R,R] for arbitrary R>0 (Linear matrix ODEs have unique global solutions on a fixed interval).

[L3]

The dichotomy theorem gives T-invariant subspaces Es,Eu with Rn=Es⊕Eu and constants C≥1, c>0 such that clauses 1-3 of the theorem hold, and Es={v:etTv→0 (t→+∞)}, Eu={v:etTv→0 (t→−∞)}, whenever no eigenvalue of its complexification TC:C⊗RRn→C⊗RRn has real part 0 (Exponential dichotomy for a hyperbolic endomorphism: invariant stable and unstable subspaces with exponential estimates); TC is the complex-linear extension of T (Complexification as C⊗RV with its canonical real-linear embedding, Complexification of a real-linear map), represented by the same matrix on Cn in the standard coordinate identification (the dichotomy theorem, Fact F1); λ∈C is its eigenvalue when TCv=λv for some 0≠v∈Cn (Eigenvalues, eigenvectors, eigenspaces Eλ(T)=ker⁡(T−λI), and the spectrum σF(T) of an endomorphism).

Verification

technique · direct; solve the linear matrix initial value problems explicitly and check the dichotomy estimates
1.1givenL1L2L4algebra

Write A=−I2+N with N=(0100), so that N2=0 and N commutes with I2. Define F(t):=e−t(I2+tN)=e−t(1t01); differentiating entrywise with the product rule and (e−t)′=−e−t [L4] gives F′(t)=−e−t(I2+tN)+e−tN=e−t(−I2+N−tN) and AF(t)=(−I2+N)e−t(I2+tN)=e−t(−I2+N−tN+tN2)=e−t(−I2+N−tN); since F(0)=I2, [L2] gives etA=F(t) for all t.

1.2givenL2L3L4algebra

For B=diag⁡(1/2,−3/2) define G(t):=diag⁡(et/2,e−3t/2); differentiating entrywise gives G′(t)=diag⁡(12et/2,−32e−3t/2)=BG(t) and G(0)=I2, so [L2] gives etB=G(t); in particular etBe0=et/2e0 and etBe1=e−3t/2e1. No eigenvalue of B is purely imaginary: if BCv=λv with λ∈C and 0≠v=(v0,v1)∈C2, the two coordinates give 12v0=λv0 and −32v1=λv1, so v0≠0 forces λ=1/2 while v1≠0 forces λ=−3/2. Hence [L3] applies to B.

2.1step 1.1L3algebra

The only eigenvalue of A is −1: if ACv=λv with λ∈C and 0≠v=(v0,v1)∈C2, the second coordinate gives −v1=λv1 and the first gives −v0+v1=λv0. If v1=0 then v0≠0 and λ=−1; if v1≠0 then λ=−1 from the second coordinate. So no eigenvalue of A has real part 0, and [L3] applies to A.

2.2step 1.1L3L4L5algebra

Norm estimate for A: put w(t):=etAv, so w′=Aw by step 1.1. For f(t):=∥w(t)∥22=w0(t)2+w1(t)2 the product rule gives f′(t)=2⟨Aw,w⟩1=−2w02+2w0w1−2w12≤−w02−w12=−f(t), because 2w0w1≤w02+w12, equivalently (w0−w1)2≥0. Hence (etf(t))′=et(f+f′)≤0, and the derivative sign criterion [L5] gives etf(t)≤f(0)=∥v∥22 for t≥0. Taking nonnegative square roots yields ∥etAv∥2≤e−t/2∥v∥2 for all v and t≥0, including v=0. Thus C=1, c=1/2 are admissible constants for A in the sense of [L3].

3.1step 2.12.2L3L4

Identification of the subspaces for A: the estimate of step 2.2 holds for every v∈R2, so etAv→0 as t→+∞ for every v (by e−t/2→0 from [L4]); by the characterisation in [L3] the stable subspace is Es=R2, and since R2=Es⊕Eu we get Eu={0}.

4.1step 2.11.2L3L4algebra∎

Subspaces and constants for B: for v=(v0,v1) step 1.2 gives etBv=(et/2v0, e−3t/2v1); from the limits in [L4], as t→+∞ this tends to 0 exactly when v0=0, and as t→−∞ exactly when v1=0. By [L3], Es=Re1 and Eu=Re0. With c=1/4 the estimates hold: for t≥0, e−3t/2≤e−t/4 and et/2≥et/4; for t≤0, et/2≤et/4. Each follows from ea≤eb whenever a≤b, which is a consequence of eb=eaeb−a and eb−a≥1 for b−a≥0 [L4]. Hence C=1, c=1/4 are admissible constants for B. This proves the computed constants.

Remarks

  • The first matrix shows that the dichotomy does not require diagonalisability: the explicit shear has a polynomial factor in its entries, while the symmetric-part estimate in step 2.2 proves the Euclidean bound with C=1, c=1/2. The constant C is not claimed to be 1 for every admissible rate: the computation is a finite check for the displayed rates, not a general bound.

  • In both examples the admissible rates are strictly below the spectral gap, and the conclusion of [L3] is realized with C=1; no claim is made about optimal constants or about the converse direction of the theorem.

CounterexampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passOpen item page →

A non-hyperbolic equilibrium with no positive eigenvalue can still be unstable: x'=x^3

Statement refuted

If F:R→R is C1 with F(0)=0 and no eigenvalue of A=DF(0) has positive real part, then 0 is a Lyapunov stable equilibrium of x′=F(x).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The function F:R→R, F(x)=x3, and its initial value problem x′=x3.

[L1]

The equilibrium notion and Lyapunov stability of an equilibrium of z′=F(z) are defined in The local flow of an autonomous first-order system-based terms by Equilibria, Lyapunov stability and asymptotic stability of an autonomous first-order system: 0 is stable when for every ε>0 there is δ>0 such that every maximal solution with ∣x(0)∣<δ is defined for all t≥0 and satisfies ∣x(t)∣<ε for all t≥0.

[L2]

Every initial value problem satisfying the Picard-Lindelöf hypotheses has a unique maximal solution, and every solution through the same data is its restriction (Every Picard–Lindelöf initial value problem has one maximal solution on an open interval, Extensions, maximal solutions, maximal intervals, and global solutions, First-order systems, initial value problems, and solutions on intervals).

Counterexample

technique · direct; exhibit the explicit blowing-up solution through each small positive initial value
1.1givenL3

F(x)=x3 satisfies F(0)=0 and DF(0)=0 by [L3], so the hypothesis of the refuted statement is satisfied with A=0.

1.2givenL3algebra

Let x0>0 and define x(t):=x0 (1−2x02t)−1/2 on J:=[0,1/(2x02)). Differentiating the power using the chain rule and the algebra of derivatives, x′(t)=x0⋅(−12)(1−2x02t)−3/2⋅(−2x02)=x03(1−2x02t)−3/2=x(t)3 for t∈J, and x(0)=x0; hence x is a solution on J of the initial value problem.

2.1step 1.2L2

By [L2] the solution of step 1.2 is the restriction of the unique maximal solution through (0,x0). As t↑1/(2x02) the quantity 1−2x02t tends to 0 from above, so x(t)→+∞; in particular the maximal solution is not defined at t=1/(2x02) and therefore is not defined for all t≥0.

3.1step 1.12.1L1algebra∎

Instability: given any δ>0, choose x0∈(0,δ). The maximal solution through x0 is not defined for all t≥0 by step 2.1, so the defining condition of stability in [L1] fails for every ε>0: there is no δ that keeps all maximal solutions with ∣x(0)∣<δ defined for all time. Hence 0 is not Lyapunov stable, refuting the statement.

Remarks

Sources