Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Off-shell gauge complexes, BRST doublets and anomaly obstructions

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, postulates, theorems and proofs

DefinitionDefinition: AI-adaptedProof: Not applicableverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

Abelian local jet BRST differential

Definition

Use the smooth off-shell coordinate model M=R4, with x0=clightt in SI coordinates, metric η=diag⁡(−1,1,1,1), increasing x0 as the future direction, and standard orientation. The scalar time-ordering convention sets clight=1, so x0 is the length coordinate in that convention as well. Here off shell means that no field equation is imposed. Take smooth real components aμ∈C∞(M;R) and a smooth commuting matter field ψ∈C∞(M;C4). Use the normalized real potential a=aμdxμ and dimensionless coupling g=qμ0clight/ℏ of the charged-gauge-data convention; aμ has units m−1, g is dimensionless, and ψ has units m−3/2. The exact supplier convention is aμ′=aμ+∂μα, ψ′=eigαψ, for a smooth dimensionless real infinitesimal gauge parameter α.

Let P be the free graded-commutative C-algebra over C∞(M;C) generated by the finite jets of aμ, ψ, an odd ghost cgh, an odd antighost cˉ, and an even auxiliary variable B. Every element of P is a polynomial in finitely many jet coordinates. The fields aμ and ψ have Grassmann parity 0 and ghost number 0; cgh has parity 1 and ghost number 1; cˉ has parity 1 and ghost number −1; and B has parity 0 and ghost number 0. The ghost and nonminimal variables are formal algebraic generators; no state-space or positivity claim is made. The generators cgh,cˉ,B carry no physical unit assignment, and the differential below is dimensionless. The subscript distinguishes the ghost from the speed of light clight.

Let s vanish on the coefficient algebra, so sf=0 for every f∈C∞(M;C). Thus s is C∞(M;C)-linear.

Define the odd derivation s:P→P of ghost number 1 by

saμ=∂μcgh,scgh=0,scˉ=B,sB=0,sψ=igcghψ.

Extend s by the graded Leibniz rule s(XY)=(sX)Y+(−1)∣X∣X(sY) for homogeneous X, where ∣X∣ is Grassmann parity, and by s(∂βX)=∂β(sX) for every multi-index β. This is an off-shell local algebraic differential for the Abelian gauge transformations; it is not a BRST charge on a Hilbert space and it does not assert existence of a gauge-invariant quantum theory.

LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

Nilpotence and contraction of nonminimal doublets

Statement

The Abelian jet derivation s defined in the local BRST algebra satisfies s2=0. More generally, take any finite set of jet doublets uj,vj with ∣vj∣=∣uj∣+1(mod2), gh⁡(vj)=gh⁡(uj)+1, suj=vj, and svj=0, and suppose the transformations of all other generators are independent of these doublets. Define the doublet-number operator N=∑j(uj∂L∂uj+vj∂L∂vj) and the odd homotopy h=∑juj∂L∂vj, using left graded derivatives. Then [N,s]=0 and sh+hs=N. Consequently the inclusion of the doublet-independent polynomial subalgebra induces an isomorphism on polynomial BRST cohomology. In particular, if sak=0 and Nak=kak for a positive integer k, then ak=s(hak/k).

For a ghost-number grading, write this cohomology as Hr(s,P)=ker⁡(s:Pr→Pr+1)/im⁡(s:Pr−1→Pr).

Doublet diagram

For one fixed jet index, the arrows record the differential on the pair: s(uj)=vj and s(vj)=0. The zero at the right is the zero element. The proof verifies nilpotence and the homotopy identity algebraically; the diagram is only a record of the generator maps.

ujvj0ss

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The algebra and odd graded derivation in Abelian local jet BRST differential.

[F1]

Abelian local jet BRST differential: P is a graded-commutative finite-jet polynomial algebra; s is odd, raises ghost number by one, obeys the graded Leibniz rule, and commutes with spacetime derivatives. Its generator values are saμ=∂μcgh, scgh=0, scˉ=B, sB=0, and sψ=igcghψ.

[A1]

For a finite chosen family of additional jet pairs, suj=vj and svj=0, with opposite parity and ghost number increased by one, and the s-transformations of all other generators do not involve uj or vj.

Proof

Given: [F1] and [A1].

1.1givenF1algebra

On the gauge and nonminimal generators, s2aμ=s(∂μcgh)=∂μ(scgh)=0, s2cgh=0, s2cˉ=sB=0, and s2B=0. Commutation of s with spacetime derivatives gives the same equality on every jet of these generators.

1.2givenF1algebra

Since cgh is odd in a graded-commutative algebra over C, cgh2=−cgh2 and hence cgh2=0. The graded Leibniz rule therefore gives s2ψ=s(igcghψ)=−igcgh(igcghψ)=g2cgh2ψ=0.

2.1step 1.1step 1.2algebra

The square of an odd derivation is an even derivation: the two mixed terms in s2(XY) cancel by the graded Leibniz rule. It vanishes on every generator and every jet by steps 1.1–1.2, so it vanishes on each finite polynomial in P.

3.1A1step 2.1algebra

Now s2=0 by step 2.1, so s is a differential. It preserves the number of the selected doublet variables: its action on the other generators is independent of them, and each term vj∂L/∂uj replaces one uj by one vj. Thus [N,s]=0. On each pair, huj=0, hvj=uj, suj=vj, and svj=0, so (sh+hs)uj=uj and (sh+hs)vj=vj. Both sh+hs and N are even derivations and vanish on the doublet-independent generators; equality on generators proves sh+hs=N on the polynomial algebra.

4.1step 3.1algebra

Let ak be s-closed and homogeneous of doublet number k>0. Since [N,s]=0, the homogeneous components of any s-closed polynomial are separately s-closed. Applying sh+hs=N to ak gives s(hak)=kak because sak=0; division by the nonzero integer k yields ak=s(hak/k).

5.1step 3.1step 4.1algebra

Every polynomial has a finite decomposition a=∑k≥0ak. For an s-closed a, step 4.1 makes every ak with k>0 exact, while a0 is closed by [N,s]=0. Therefore every extended cohomology class has a representative in the doublet-independent subalgebra.

6.1step 3.1step 5.1algebra∎

If a doublet-independent closed polynomial a0 is sb in the extended algebra, take the doublet-number-zero component b0 of the finite decomposition of b. Because s preserves N, the number-zero component of sb=a0 is sb0=a0. Thus a class from the minimal subalgebra becomes exact in the extension only if it was already exact there, proving injectivity as well as the surjectivity in step 5.1.

DefinitionDefinition: AI-adaptedProof: Not applicableverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

Relative local BRST cohomology

Definition

Use the four-dimensional coordinate and jet algebra and nilpotent differential s fixed by the earlier Abelian local BRST definition and nilpotence lemma. For integers r and 0≤p≤4, a compactly supported local horizontal p-form of ghost number r is a finite sum of terms fi1…ip(x,z) dxi1∧⋯∧dxip, where each coefficient is smooth and compactly supported in x∈R4, polynomial in finitely many field-jet coordinates z, and homogeneous of ghost number r. Denote this space by Ωloc,cr,p. A left derivative is used for odd jet coordinates.

For each spacetime index μ, define the total derivative on a local coefficient by Dμ=∂∂xμ+∑i,αzα+eμi∂L∂zαi, where α ranges over multi-indices, i over the field and ghost generators, and eμ is the multi-index with one derivative in direction μ. The horizontal exterior derivative is dH=dxμ∧Dμ. It satisfies dH2=0. Extend s to a homogeneous p-form by sω=(−1)pscoeffω, where scoeff acts on its coefficient by the earlier local BRST definition; then s2=0 and sdH+dHs=0.

Set Ωloc,cr,p=0 for p<0 or p>4. Evaluation of a compactly supported local four-form on any smooth off-shell configuration is a finite integral.

For a graded subcomplex Kr,p⊆Ωloc,cr,p stable under s and dH, define Zr,p(s∣dH;K)={ap∈Kr,p: sap+dHap−1=0 for some ap−1∈Kr+1,p−1} and Br,p(s∣dH;K)={sbp+dHcp−1: bp∈Kr−1,p, cp−1∈Kr,p−1}. The relative local BRST cohomology is Hr,p(s∣dH;K)=Zr,p/Br,p. In four dimensions, H1(s∣dH) is shorthand for H1,4(s∣dH). For compactly supported coefficients, ∫R4dHc3=0 by the one-variable fundamental theorem of calculus in each coordinate and Fubini's theorem, so the quotient by dH identifies densities that define the same integrated local functional.

PropositionStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

Wess–Zumino consistency is an obstruction class

Statement

Assume AC and Countable Choice, fix admissible flat scalar free data and a local scalar polynomial class under a scalar formal time-ordering theorem, and work conditionally in a time-ordering scheme satisfying that theorem's statement. At order n, let Kn be an s,dH-stable subcomplex of the compactly supported local-form spaces defined earlier, with Kn0,4 exactly the allowed local counterterm densities. For each ghost number r, put Fnr:=Knr,4/dHKnr,3, the local-functional quotient formed using this same subcomplex, and let Fn∙⟦ℏ⟧ denote formal power series. Let Wℏ=s+∑j≥1ℏjWj be an odd formal operator of ghost number one on this module, with Wℏ2=0 and leading coefficient the induced s. Let X∈Fn0⟦ℏ⟧ and suppose its first possible breaking is WℏX=ℏnA+O(ℏn+1),n≥1,A=[a4]Fn, where ℏ is a formal indeterminate, O(ℏn+1) means terms of formal degree at least n+1, every lower coefficient vanishes, and a4∈Kn1,4 is a compactly supported local four-form of ghost number one. Then sa4 is dH-exact within Kn. There exists an admissible counterterm b4∈Kn0,4 such that the shift X↦X−ℏn[b4]Fn cancels the order-n breaking in Fn1 if and only if [a4]s∣dH=0inH1,4(s∣dH;Kn). This is a conditional obstruction statement. Locality of a4, nilpotence of the formal Ward differential, and admissibility of the counterterm space are assumptions; the result does not establish a quantum action principle.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The relative local-form conventions, the Abelian nilpotent differential, and the conditional scalar time-ordering result.

[F1]

Nilpotence and contraction of nonminimal doublets: the Abelian local differential s is nilpotent.

[F2]

Relative local BRST cohomology: a ghost-number-one four-form a4 is a relative cocycle when sa4 is dH-exact; its class vanishes exactly when a4=sb4+dHc3 in the chosen local subcomplex. For compact support, ∫dHc3=0.

[F3]

Scalar Epstein–Glaser induction at finite perturbative order: assuming the Axiom of Choice and Countable Choice and fixing any admissible flat scalar free datum and local scalar polynomial class, there exists a sequence of symmetric multilinear maps Tn satisfying the scalar time-ordering contract at every finite order, with finite graph scaling bounds and the stated local extension ambiguities. This supplier does not establish a BRST Ward identity, locality of an anomaly, a quantum action principle, or a positive physical Hilbert quotient.

[A3]

The Axiom of Choice: every family of nonempty sets has a choice function. This is a hypothesis of [F3] and is carried here only through that conditional scalar-system supplier.

[A4]

The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω): every countable family of nonempty sets has a choice function. This is a hypothesis of [F3] and is carried here only through that conditional scalar-system supplier.

[A1]

On Fn∙⟦ℏ⟧, Wℏ=s+O(ℏ) is an odd formal ghost-number-one operator with Wℏ2=0, and WℏX=ℏnA+O(ℏn+1) with all lower coefficients zero.

[A2]

The order-n anomaly density a4 is local and compactly supported; the chosen s,dH-stable subcomplex Kn contains it, and every element of Kn0,4 is an admissible counterterm for this formal scheme.

Proof

Given: [F1], [F2], [F3], [A1], [A2], [A3] and [A4].

1.1givenF3A1A2A3A4

Under the hypotheses of [F3], including [A3] and [A4], the scalar time-ordering input exists as a formal coefficientwise scheme. Fix such a scheme as background. The additional operator Wℏ, its nilpotence, and the locality premise in [A1]–[A2] are separate hypotheses not supplied by [F3].

2.1A1step 1.1algebra

Apply Wℏ to the expansion in [A1]. Since Wℏ2X=0, its order-ℏn coefficient is the leading operator s applied to A; all terms from the positive powers of ℏ in Wℏ have order at least n+1. Hence sA=0 in Fn2.

3.1F1F2A2step 2.1

Since A=[a4]Fn and sA=0 in Fn2, the quotient definition in [F2] gives sa4=dHc3 for some c3∈Kn2,3, after absorbing a sign into c3. Thus a4 is a cocycle in the specified relative local cohomology.

4.1F2A2step 3.1

If [a4]s∣dH=0, the quotient definition in [F2], restricted to Kn, supplies b4∈Kn0,4 and c3∈Kn1,3 such that a4=sb4+dHc3. This uses the cocycle conclusion of step 3.1 so the relative class is defined.

5.1F2A1A2step 4.1algebra

The counterterm class [b4]Fn is admissible by [A2]. Replacing X by X−ℏn[b4]Fn changes the order-n breaking by −s[b4]Fn, because the leading term of Wℏ is s. Step 4.1 gives [a4]Fn=s[b4]Fn, since dHc3 is zero in that quotient, so the breaking is canceled.

6.1F2A1A2step 3.1algebra∎

Conversely, if an admissible local counterterm class [b4]Fn cancels the order-n breaking in Fn1, then [a4]Fn−s[b4]Fn=0. By the quotient definition in [F2], a4−sb4=dHc3 for some c3∈Kn1,3. This is exactly the relative coboundary condition; step 3.1 ensures that [a4]s∣dH is the class under discussion.

5 · Examples, experiments and counterexamples

None yet.

Sources