Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Supported static heat model — Examples

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

The cosine example gives a closed-form decaying mode in the supported parabolic heat model. Its redshifted temperature tends to a constant, while its proper-temperature limit varies with a nonconstant lapse. The formula and insulated-face conditions are verified directly; this constructed solution is not an experimental observation.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, postulates, theorems and proofs

None yet.

5 · Examples, experiments and counterexamples

ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)Open item page →

Redshifted cosine medium

Physical scope

One explicit compatible cosine profile in the fixed-lapse, externally supported parabolic heat model; the proper equilibrium is spatially nonuniform when the selected lapse is nonconstant.

Example

Use the box, positive lapse N, constants, material and support of Conditional redshift heat relaxation. Assume N is nonconstant on Ω. Choose ϑ‾>0 and δ∈R with ∣δ∣<ϑ‾. Set

ϑ0(x)=ϑ‾+δcos⁡ ⁣(πx1L1),x∈Ω‾.

The unique redshifted-temperature solution and proper-temperature field are

ϑ(tK,x)=ϑ‾+δexp⁡ ⁣(−A0π2tKCVL12)cos⁡ ⁣(πx1L1),T(tK,x)=ϑ(tK,x)N(x).

The redshifted temperature converges to ϑ‾, while the proper temperature converges to the nonconstant profile ϑ‾/N(x). This is a calculated solution of the postulated model, not an observation about an actual material.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Li,A0,CV>0, a smooth nonconstant lapse bounded above and strictly away from zero on Ω‾, and ϑ‾>0 with ∣δ∣<ϑ‾, all under the physical-model conditions of Conditional redshift heat relaxation.

[F1]

Conditional redshift heat relaxation: the fixed model solves CV∂tKϑ=A0Δxϑ with zero normal derivative on each face, and its solution is unique for the stated positive even-reflected periodic initial data. It also gives T=ϑ/N and the limit Teq=ϑ‾/N.

Verification

1.1givenalgebra

Extend the displayed initial profile to all R3 by the same cosine formula. It is C∞, even and 2Li-periodic in every coordinate. Its values lie between ϑ‾−∣δ∣ and ϑ‾+∣δ∣, so the strict inequality on δ gives positive lower and finite upper bounds. Its average on Ω is ϑ‾, because the integral of cos⁡(πx1/L1) from 0 to L1 is 0.

2.1givenF1step 1.1algebra

Put r=A0π2/(CVL12)>0. Differentiating the proposed solution gives ∂tKϑ=−rδe−rtKcos⁡(πx1/L1) and Δxϑ=−(π2/L12)δe−rtKcos⁡(πx1/L1), hence CV∂tKϑ=A0Δxϑ. Its initial trace is ϑ0. Also ∂x1ϑ=−(πδ/L1)e−rtKsin⁡(πx1/L1) vanishes at x1=0,L1, and ∂x2ϑ=∂x3ϑ=0, so every face has zero normal derivative. Uniqueness in [F1] identifies this function with the model solution.

3.1F1step 2.1algebra∎

The exponential factor tends to zero, so ϑ(tK,x)→ϑ‾. Because N is time independent and positive, T=ϑ/N→ϑ‾/N pointwise. The latter is nonconstant by the stipulated nonconstancy of N. Direct integration using ∫0L1cos⁡2(πx1/L1) dx1=L1/2 gives the exact norm ∥ϑ(tK,⋅)−ϑ‾∥L2(Ω)=∣δ∣∣Ω∣/2 e−rtK. Thus this example realizes a decaying redshifted mode with a spatially varying proper-temperature equilibrium in the selected model.

Sources