Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Gibbs sampling and scan schemes — Examples

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

Summary

On the ambient product {0,1}2, a target supported only on the diagonal makes every single-site update stay at its current supported state; the resulting two-state restricted chain is reducible. The remaining examples compute both full conditionals for a correlated bivariate Gaussian, then use cross-time covariance to show a fixed systematic sweep can be nonreversible despite preserving the Gaussian target.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

None yet.

5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedOpen item page →

A constrained support can make single-site Gibbs reducible

Example

Let the ambient product state space be S={0,1}×{0,1} with its full product sigma-algebra, and let π=12δ(0,0)+12δ(1,1). Its support is the constrained diagonal set E={(0,0),(1,1)}. Each single-site full conditional is the point mass at the retained coordinate, so either coordinate-update kernel restricts to the identity transition matrix on E. The chain on E is reducible under Reducibility of a finite Markov chain.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The finite state space and target law in the Example.

[F1]

A Gibbs block update retains the other coordinate and draws the updated coordinate from its full conditional. Exact Gibbs block update.

[F2]

A finite chain is reducible when it has a nonempty proper closed subset. Reducibility of a finite Markov chain.

[F3]

A proper full conditional kernel is an everywhere probability kernel satisfying the conditional event identities. Proper full conditional kernel.

[F4]

Measurable rectangles generate the finite product sigma-algebra. The product sigma-algebra and its finite iterates.

Verification

Given: The hypotheses in the Example and facts [F1]–[F3].

1.1F3F4givenconstruct

The coordinate marginals are uniform on {0,1}. For coordinate 1 set K{1}(t,⋅)=δt; for any measurable C⊆S and D⊆{0,1}, π(C∩p2−1(D))=12∑t∈D1C(t,t)=∫DK{1}(t,Ct) π2(dt), where Ct={s:(s,t)∈C}. Exchanging the coordinates gives the same identity for K{2}(t,⋅)=δt. Each section is a probability measure at every conditioning value, and the identities for all C,D prove that these are proper full conditional kernels by [F3].

2.1F1F2step 1.1∎

Starting from either state (t,t)∈E, updating coordinate 1 draws t from K{1}(t,⋅), and updating coordinate 2 draws t from K{2}(t,⋅). Thus both component transition matrices restricted to E are the identity. Each singleton {(0,0)} and {(1,1)} is nonempty, proper, and closed, so [F2] makes the restricted finite chain reducible.

ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedOpen item page →

Full conditionals for a bivariate normal target

Example

Assume AC. Let −1<ρ<1 and let π=N2(0,Σρ) on R2, where Σρ=(1ρρ1). Writing the state as (X,Y), its proper full conditionals are X∣Y=y∼N(ρy,1−ρ2),Y∣X=x∼N(ρx,1−ρ2)(x,y∈R). The variances are positive for every allowed ρ, so each conditional is a pointwise probability kernel on the whole conditioning space. A systematic scan that updates X and then Y can be run by the two corresponding updates of Exact Gibbs block update.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, −1<ρ<1, and the target law in the Example.

[F1]

For a nondegenerate bivariate normal target, both pointwise proper full conditionals are normal with the displayed conditional means and variances. Proper full conditionals of a nondegenerate bivariate normal law.

[A1]

AC is the stated premise of the bivariate-normal conditional-density supplier and its normal-law convention. The Axiom of Choice.

[F2]

A Gibbs block update keeps the retained coordinate and samples the updated coordinate from its supplied full conditional kernel. Exact Gibbs block update.

Verification

Given: The hypotheses in the Example and facts [A1], [F1], [F2].

1.1A1F1given

Apply [F1] with mX=mY=0, σX=σY=1, and r=ρ. This gives X∣Y=y∼N(ρy,1−ρ2) for every y. Applying the same supplier with the coordinates exchanged gives Y∣X=x∼N(ρx,1−ρ2) for every x. Since 1−ρ2>0, both laws are nondegenerate normal probabilities, and the supplier gives their normalized densities as everywhere conditional kernels.

2.1F1F2given∎

With these two kernels, [F2] updates X by drawing from the first conditional while holding Y fixed, and then updates Y from the second conditional at the new X value. Both are exact block updates for the stated target, with no support or zero-normalizer exception because the conditional variances are strictly positive.

ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedOpen item page →

A systematic Gaussian Gibbs sweep need not be reversible

Example

Assume AC and take ρ=12 in Full conditionals for a bivariate normal target. Initialize (X0,Y0)∼π=N2(0,Σρ) and use the systematic order X then Y. The resulting full-sweep kernel preserves π but is not reversible with respect to it.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, the bivariate normal target, and the systematic update order in the Example.

[A1]

AC is inherited from the cited normal conditional-density convention. The Axiom of Choice.

[F1]

The full conditionals are X∣Y=y∼N(ρy,1−ρ2) and Y∣X=x∼N(ρx,1−ρ2) for every conditioning value. Full conditionals for a bivariate normal target.

[F2]

A systematic full sweep of exact Gibbs updates leaves π invariant. A systematic Gibbs sweep preserves the target.

[F3]

Reversibility means symmetry of the two-time transition flow on every measurable rectangle. Reversibility for a probability kernel.

[F4]

For square-integrable real random variables, covariance is Cov⁡(U,V)=E[(U−EU)(V−EV)] and is bilinear when the terms are integrable. Moments, variance, and covariance on a probability space.

[F5]

A target probability and transition kernel define the joint law of one transition with the corresponding iterated-integral identity. A prior and model kernel define a joint law.

[F6]

A systematic scan in the order P1 then P2 has chronological kernel composition P1P2. Composition of probability kernels.

[F7]

Finite measures agreeing on the generating rectangles agree on the product sigma-algebra. Measures agreeing on a generating pi-system are equal under an increasing finite-measure exhaustion from that pi-system.

[F8]

A multivariate normal law has the specified mean vector and covariance matrix. Multivariate normal law, including singular covariance.

Verification

Given: The hypotheses in the Example and facts [A1], [F1]–[F7].

1.1A1F1F2F5F6F8givenalgebra

The conditional means in [F1], integrated in the order [F6] under the joint law [F5], give EX1=ρEY0=0 and EY1=ρEX1=0. By [F8], the initial target has EY02=1 and E[X0Y0]=ρ. The first conditional variance in [F1] gives E[X12∣Y0]=ρ2Y02+1−ρ2, so EX12=1. The invariant full-sweep law [F2] gives (X1,Y1)∼π, hence EY12=1. Thus all four coordinates are square-integrable, and their cross-products are integrable by 2∣ab∣≤a2+b2.

2.1F1F4F5F6F8step 1.1algebra

The means in step 1.1 are zero, so [F4] makes each cross-covariance equal to its product expectation. Using the kernel order [F6], the first conditional mean in [F1], and [F8], Cov⁡(Y0,X1)=∫π(dx0,dy0)y0∫x1K1(y0,dx1)=ρEY02=ρ. For the other cross term, the second conditional mean followed by the first gives Cov⁡(X0,Y1)=∫π(dx0,dy0)x0∫K1(y0,dx1)∫y1K2(x1,dy1)=ρ2E[X0Y0]=ρ3. The integrability established in step 1.1 justifies these signed iterated integrals.

3.1F2F3F4F7F8step 1.1step 2.1algebra∎

If the full-sweep kernel were reversible, [F3] would give equality of its two-time law and the state-swapped measure on every rectangle. Both are finite measures, so [F7] gives equality on the product sigma-algebra. The integrable function ((x0,y0),(x1,y1))↦y0x1 would then have the same integral as its state-swapped version x0y1, forcing Cov⁡(Y0,X1)=Cov⁡(X0,Y1) because all four coordinates are centered. But [F8] and step 2.1 give these covariances as ρ and ρ3, which differ for ρ=12. Hence the full-sweep kernel is not reversible, although [F2] proves it preserves π.

Sources