Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Conformal constraint weights and charged time-symmetric data — Examples

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, postulates, theorems and proofs

None yet.

5 · Examples, experiments and counterexamples

ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

Extremal cylindrical puncture end

Example

Let m=∣q∣>0 in the one-hole Reissner–Nordström (RN) conformal-data family; this equality defines its extremal parameter case. Use the punctured spatial manifold Σ=(0,∞)×S2. Then ψ2=1+m/r, h:=ψ4(dr2+r2γS2), and the centered sphere is Sr:={r}×S2, with areal radius ρ(r):=rψ2=r+m. On each Sr use the outward unit normal ν:=ψ−2∂r and define the mean-curvature scalar H:=div⁡hν; a sphere is minimal exactly when H=0. With this convention, no centered coordinate sphere is minimal. The proper radial coordinate

s(r):=r+mlog⁡(r/m)

has range R and gives

h=ds2+(r(s)+m)2γS2.

As r↓0, s→−∞ and r(s)+m→m, so this end is asymptotic to the product cylinder R×S2 with round-sphere radius m. The puncture is omitted; no point-source interpretation or global event-horizon claim is part of this example.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: m=∣q∣>0, the isotropic conformal data on (0,∞)×S2, and the formulas in the Statement.

[F1]

RN conformal data on a punctured exterior: ψ2=(1+m/(2r))2−q2/(4r2), K=0, and Rareal=rψ2; the puncture r=0 is excluded from the smooth data manifold.

Verification

1.1givenF1algebra

Substituting q2=m2 into the conformal factor gives ψ2=(1+m/(2r))2−m2/(4r2)=1+m/r, which is positive for every r>0. Therefore ρ=rψ2=r+m and ρ′(r)=1.

2.1givenstep 1.1algebra

The radial line element of h=ψ4(dr2+r2γS2) is ψ2dr=(1+m/r)dr. Since s′(r)=1+m/r=ψ2>0, s is a proper radial coordinate; moreover s→−∞ as r↓0 and s→+∞ as r→∞, so its range is R.

3.1step 1.1step 2.1algebra

Replacing ψ4dr2 by ds2 and using ρ=r+m gives h=ds2+ρ(s)2γS2. As s→−∞, r(s)→0, so ρ(s)2→m2 and the spherical coefficient converges to that of the product cylinder of radius m.

4.1step 1.1step 2.1algebra∎

The unit normal to Sr is ν=ψ−2∂r. Its mean curvature is H=div⁡hν=2ρ′/(ψ2ρ)=2r/(r+m)2>0 for every r>0. Thus no centered coordinate sphere is minimal, while the infinite negative range of s proves that the puncture is an infinite-distance cylindrical end.

CounterexampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

Unscaled electric vectors fail the transformed Gauss law

Statement refuted

The assignment E=Eˉ always preserves the source-free electric divergence constraint under h=ψ4hˉ.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Euclidean manifold Σ=R3 with Cartesian coordinate x, seed metric hˉ=δ, positive conformal factor ψ=ex, and constant seed vector Eˉ=∂x. Set Bˉ=B=0 and use h=ψ4δ.

[F1]

Exact conformal electrovacuum constraint transformation: the divergence-preserving geometric field is E=ψ−6Eˉ, and DiEi=ψ−6DˉiEˉi.

Counterexample

1.1givenF1algebra

The seed vector Eˉ=∂x has Euclidean divergence DˉiEˉi=∂x(1)=0, so it satisfies the source-free seed Gauss condition. The function ψ=ex is smooth and positive on all of R3.

2.1givenstep 1.1algebra

If instead one assigns the unscaled vector E=Eˉ, then det⁡h=ψ6=e6x and the coordinate divergence formula gives DiEi=(det⁡h)−1∂i(det⁡h Ei)=e−6x∂x(e6x)=6. Thus the claimed universal preservation fails: this smooth field violates DiEi=0 everywhere.

3.1F1step 1.1step 2.1algebra∎

The correct conformal field is E=ψ−6Eˉ=e−6x∂x, for which step 1.1's seed identity gives DiEi=e−6xDˉiEˉi=0. Hence the counterexample isolates the missing vector weight and uses no singular source at a removed point.

Sources