Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Sourced Maxwell sign and current conservation — Examples

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

Scope

This companion gives an explicit smooth Maxwell field and current on a flat product with compact spatial three-torus. The equations hold pointwise, while the total charge on the compact boundaryless spatial cycle vanishes. The construction is a mathematical model example, not a reported experiment or a claim about a physical system.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, postulates, theorems and proofs

None yet.

5 · Examples, experiments and counterexamples

ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedOpen item page →

Compact boundaryless Gauss neutrality

Example

Fix periods L1,L2,L3>0 and use the smooth quotient geometry and global forms and vector fields supplied by The scaled three-torus as a smooth compact flat spatial manifold. In its coordinates set M:=Rx0×TL3, with g=−(dx0)2+(dx1)2+(dx2)2+(dx3)2, orientation dx0∧dx1∧dx2∧dx3, and time orientation N=∂0. Fix c,μ0>0 as real coefficients and put

f~(x):=cos⁡(2πx1L1),h~(x):=L12πsin⁡(2πx1L1).

These lifts on R3 are independent of x2,x3 and are Λ-periodic. Let f,h:TL3→R be their unique smooth descents, so f∘q=f~ and h∘q=h~. The descended global vector field ∂1 satisfies ∂1h=f and dh=f dx1. On the lifts, h~′=f~ and h~(L1,x2,x3)=h~(0,x2,x3). Define the smooth current and field

j:=f ∂0,F:=−μ0h dx0∧dx1.

Let ι∗:TL3→M be the slice inclusion y↦(x∗0,y), and let T3:={s∈R3:si≥0, s1+s2+s3≤1}. Orient the slice by the restriction of the global form dx1∧dx2∧dx3. Let θ:T3→Δ3 be the affine identification θ(s)=(1−s1−s2−s3,s1,s2,s3). Let Σ be the oriented spatial slice x0=x∗0, represented as a finite smooth singular chain as follows. Triangulate the fundamental cube [0,L1]×[0,L2]×[0,L3] by the six tetrahedra indexed by σ∈S3. The ordered vertices of tetrahedron σ are 0, Lσ(1)eσ(1), Lσ(1)eσ(1)+Lσ(2)eσ(2), and (L1,L2,L3). Let ϕσ:T3→R3 be the affine map taking 0,e1,e2,e3 to these ordered vertices; it extends affinely to R3. Define the smooth singular simplex ψσ:=ι∗∘q∘ϕσ∘θ−1:Δ3→M; in the standard T3 parameter it satisfies ψσ∘θ=ι∗∘q∘ϕσ. It extends smoothly to a neighborhood of Δ3 in its affine plane because ϕσ extends affinely and q,ι∗ are smooth. Put Σ:=∑σ∈S3sgn⁡(σ)ψσ. Thus each simplex maps into the slice of M. The determinant of the ordered edge vectors is L1L2L3sgn⁡(σ), so this coefficient gives each simplex the cube orientation. The six regions are the orderings 0≤uσ(3)≤uσ(2)≤uσ(1)≤1 of ui:=xi/Li; their interiors are disjoint and their union is the cube. Internal faces cancel in pairs, and opposite cube faces are identified by period translations with opposite boundary orientations, as verified below.

0(L1;L2;L3)sixtetrahedrax3=0»L3x1=0»L1x2=0»L2

The perspective box depicts the fundamental cube, with opposite faces paired by the labels. Its dotted body diagonal is the shared edge of the six affine tetrahedra indexed by coordinate permutations. The drawing is schematic and is not used in the chain-boundary proof above.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Li,c,μ0>0, the product Lorentzian geometry and the smooth fields in the Example.

[F1]

The scaled three-torus as a smooth compact flat spatial manifold proves the quotient is a smooth compact boundaryless torus, the global dxi,∂i descend, and on the product M the metric components are constant η=diag⁡(−1,1,1,1), the Christoffel symbols vanish, and volg=dx0∧dx1∧dx2∧dx3.

[F2]

The alternating current-flux form is ιjvolg and charge is Q(Σ)=c−1∫Σιjvolg (The metric volume form, current flux through 3-faces and finite-chain charges, Gauss charge and finite-chain flux balance).

[F3]

For any finite smooth singular three-cycle on which a smooth sourced Maxwell field is defined, the Gauss lemma Gauss charge and finite-chain flux balance gives zero total charge.

[F4]

The smooth tangent-bundle conventions inherited from Oriented Lorentzian fields, observers and coordinate conventions and Gauss charge and finite-chain flux balance use ACω; the finite torus chain below is explicit and uses no additional choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

[F5]

The boundary of an ordered smooth singular 3-simplex is the alternating sum of its four face maps, and the boundary of a finite chain is the finite sum of these boundaries (Smooth singular chain and cochain complexes).

[F8]

The published definition Integral of a form over a smooth singular simplex defines the integral of a smooth 3-form over a smooth singular 3-simplex σ as the Jordan-set Riemann integral of the coefficient of its pullback in the standard positive affine coordinates on T3={(s1,s2,s3):si≥0, s1+s2+s3≤1}; it also establishes that T3 is compact Jordan. The published, audited change-of-variables theorem Change of variables for an injective C1 map on a compact Jordan set states: if U⊆R3 is open, ϕ:U→R3 is injective and C1 with Dϕ invertible throughout U, and K⊆U is compact Jordan, then for bounded u:ϕ(K)→R the two integrability conditions are equivalent and, when they hold, ∫ϕ(K)u(y) dy=∫Ku(ϕ(s))∣det⁡Dϕ(s)∣ ds. Its proof also establishes compact Jordan status of ϕ(K).

[F9]

The published boundary criterion says a Euclidean-metric-bounded set is Jordan measurable exactly when its boundary has content zero (A bounded set in Rm is Jordan measurable iff its boundary is null, equivalently of content zero). The published graph theorem says the graph of a continuous function on a closed nondegenerate rectangle has content zero (The graph of a continuous function on a closed nondegenerate rectangle in Rm has content zero in Rm+1). The published compact-Jordan integrability theorem states that a continuous function on a compact Jordan set is integrable there (A continuous real function on a compact Jordan measurable set is Riemann integrable over that set), and closed bounded subsets of R3 are compact (Heine-Borel in Rn: with the Euclidean metric a subset of Rn is compact if and only if it is closed and bounded, and the proof by bisection uses no choice principle; the same holds on the real line). Content zero passes to subsets and finite unions because a subset inherits a finite cube cover and finitely many such covers can be combined (Measure zero and content zero in Rm by countable and finite cube covers). If bounded Jordan sets A1,…,AN fill a bounded Jordan set A up to a content-zero remainder, have pairwise content-zero intersections, and a bounded function is integrable on A and every Ai, then the published finite-additivity lemma Additivity of the integral over finitely many Jordan pieces that fill a Jordan set up to content zero gives ∫Ag=∑i∫Aig.

[F10]

The published theorem Every continuous function on a closed nondegenerate rectangle in Rm is Riemann integrable says every continuous real function on a closed nondegenerate rectangle in Rm is Riemann integrable. The published rectangular Fubini theorem Riemann--Fubini on product rectangles, with lower and upper section integrals and content-zero exceptional sections says that for an integrable function on a product of nondegenerate rectangles, the iterated section integrals exist when the sections in that order are integrable and equal the multiple integral. The published multidimensional Darboux definition The lower and upper Darboux integrals over a nondegenerate rectangle in Rm gives the common lower/upper sum value when they agree, and rectangle volume is the product of side lengths by the published definition Axis-parallel rectangles in Rm and their volume; in particular, a constant a on a rectangle R has integral a vol⁡(R) because each lower and upper Darboux sum has that value.

Verification

Given: [F1]–[F10], the geometry, fields and finite chain defined in the Example.

1.1givenF1constructalgebra

For a fixed permutation σ, the barycentric coordinates of a point in the ordered region 0≤uσ(3)≤uσ(2)≤uσ(1)≤1 relative to its four listed vertices are 1−uσ(1), uσ(1)−uσ(2), uσ(2)−uσ(3), and uσ(3); these are nonnegative, sum to one, and reconstruct the point. Thus the six tetrahedra cover the cube with disjoint interiors. Each ϕσ extends affinely to R3, so ψσ=ι∗∘q∘ϕσ∘θ−1 extends smoothly to the affine plane containing Δ3 and is a smooth singular simplex into M. The ordered edge determinant is L1L2L3sgn⁡(σ), so the weight sgn⁡(σ) orients each tetrahedron by dx1∧dx2∧dx3.

1.2givenF1F6F7algebra

The periodic lifts are smooth by [F6], and their descents are smooth by the torus lemma; [F6]–[F7] give ∂1h=f, so F and j are smooth global fields on the product. Since dh=f dx1, dF=−μ0f dx1∧dx0∧dx1=0, the homogeneous equation holds. Raising indices gives F01=μ0h and F10=−μ0h. Thus ∇aFa0=∂1F10=−μ0f=−μ0j0, ∇aFa1=∂0F01=0=−μ0j1, and the b=2,3 equations have both sides zero. Thus both field equations are verified everywhere.

2.1givenF5step 1.1algebra

An internal facet arises by setting one adjacent-coordinate inequality to equality. The two permutations differ by swapping those adjacent entries; their omitted vertices occupy the same position in the ordered vertex lists, and the remaining three vertices have the same order. Thus the face maps in [F5] are identical, while the permutation signs are opposite. Their two coefficients in the signed face boundary therefore sum to zero. This covers both internal facet types (equal first and second coordinates, or equal second and third coordinates).

2.2givenF1F5step 1.1algebra

Fix a coordinate i and order the other two indices as (a,b). The triangle on xi=Li comes from permutation (i,a,b) by omitting vertex 0; its ordered vertices are Liei, Liei+Laea, and Liei+Laea+Lbeb. The triangle on xi=0 comes from (a,b,i) by omitting the final vertex; its ordered vertices are 0, Laea, and Laea+Lbeb. Translation by Liei makes these vertex lists identical, so their quotient face maps are equal. Moving i from first to last is two transpositions, so the permutation coefficients agree; the omitted-vertex boundary signs are +1 and −1. By [F5] the corresponding face terms cancel. This pairs every outer triangle, for all three coordinates and both orders (a,b).

2.3givenF1F2F8F9step 1.1algebraconstruct

Let C=[0,L1]×[0,L2]×[0,L3] and let Tσ⊂C be the affine tetrahedron with the ordered vertices specified in the Example; each Tσ is closed and bounded, hence compact by [F9], so the continuous lift f~ is bounded there. The standard T3 is compact Jordan by [F8]. Write ϕσ:T3→Tσ for the affine parametrization already defined. The standard positive T3 parameterization of ψσ is ψσ∘θ=ι∗∘q∘ϕσ. Since j=f∂0 and volg=dx0∧dx1∧dx2∧dx3 by [F1], the interior-product definition in [F2] gives ιjvolg=f dx1∧dx2∧dx3. The pullback of ιjvolg by ψσ∘θ has coefficient f~(ϕσ1(s))det⁡Dϕσ in the standard positive affine coordinates, because q pulls back the descended spatial coordinate forms to the Euclidean coordinate forms and ι∗ restricts them to the slice [F1]. By [F8] this is the coefficient whose integral defines ∫ψσιjvolg. This coefficient is continuous on compact Jordan T3, hence integrable by [F9]. The determinant of the three edge vectors is det⁡Dϕσ=L1L2L3sgn⁡(σ), so the chain coefficient gives sgn⁡(σ)∫ψσιjvolg=∫T3f~(ϕσ1(s))∣det⁡Dϕσ∣ ds=∫Tσf~(x1) dx1dx2dx3. The last equality is [F8]'s change-of-variables formula: T3 is compact Jordan, ϕσ extends to an injective affine C1 map on R3 with nonsingular constant derivative, and f~ is bounded and continuous on Tσ. The cube C and each Tσ are closed and bounded, hence compact by Heine--Borel, and they are bounded Jordan sets. Indeed their boundaries are finite unions of bounded pieces of affine planes; each such piece is contained in the graph of an affine function over a containing closed nondegenerate rectangle after solving the plane equation for a coordinate with nonzero normal component. These graphs have content zero by [F9], so the boundary criterion in [F9] applies. By step 1.1 the six Tσ cover C and have disjoint interiors. Thus each pairwise intersection is contained in the union of their boundaries and has content zero by finite-union and subset closure in [F9], while the remainder C∖⋃σ∈S3Tσ is empty. The coefficient f~ is continuous and bounded on the compact Jordan sets C,Tσ, so all integrals in the finite additivity hypotheses are defined by [F9]. Applying the finite Jordan-set additivity result in [F9] and using the chain definition in [F2] gives Q(Σ)=1c∑σ∈S3sgn⁡(σ)∫ψσιjvolg=1c∫Cf~(x1) dx1dx2dx3.

3.1givenF3F4F5step 2.1step 2.2algebra

The finite chain boundary is the alternating face sum in [F5]. Steps 2.1 and 2.2 cancel every internal and external face term, respectively. Hence ∂Σ=0, as required in [F3]. The explicit finite triangulation adds no choice, as [F4] records.

4.1givenF3step 3.1

Since ∂Σ=0 by step 3.1, the finite-chain neutrality result [F3] applies and gives Q(Σ)=0.

5.1givenF7F10step 2.3algebra∎

Write A=[0,L1] and B=[0,L2]×[0,L3], so C=A×B. The lift f~(x1) is continuous on C and hence integrable there by [F10]. Rectangular Fubini [F10] applies, and its sections over B are the constant function f~(x1). The multidimensional Darboux sums and volume formula in [F10] therefore give ∫Cf~(x1) dx1dx2dx3=L2L3∫0L1f~(x1) dx1. By [F7], h~′=f~ and the one-dimensional FTC gives ∫0L1f~(x1) dx1=h~(L1)−h~(0)=0, since the sine values at 0 and 2π agree. Hence the direct integral computation also yields Q(Σ)=0, in agreement with step 4.1.

Remarks

This is a mathematical model with smooth fields. It illustrates the compact-cycle constraint without using a point source or a boundary at infinity; it does not report a measurement or assert that the model describes nature.

Sources