Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Banach Gaussian priors, RKHS support, and concentration — Examples

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

The first example shows that the independent-coordinate Gaussian cylinder law on RN is not a Borel prior on ℓ2: almost surely its coordinates fail to be square summable. The second gives a rank-one finite-dimensional Gaussian process whose explicit realization is a tight Borel Gaussian law on R2, with its covariance RKHS, support, and Fernique moment computed directly. The examples distinguish cylinder existence from Banach-valued tightness without asserting posterior contraction.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

None yet.

5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-adaptedOpen item page →

An iid Gaussian cylinder process is not an ℓ²-valued prior

Example

Assume AC.

Let T=N, m(i)=0, and k(i,j)=1{i=j}. The cylinder Gaussian process with this mean and kernel has independent N(0,1) coordinates, but its coordinate sequence is almost surely not in ℓ2. Thus its cylinder law is not a tight Borel prior on ℓ2.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

Under AC, a mean function and a positive-semidefinite covariance kernel on an arbitrary set define a unique law on the cylinder sigma-algebra with the prescribed finite Gaussian means and covariances (A mean and positive-semidefinite kernel define a Gaussian process).

[F2]

The standard normal assigns a probability q=P(∣Z∣>1)>0 to {∣Z∣>1}, and finite independent standard-normal coordinates have product Gaussian law (Standard normal and normal laws, Multivariate normal law, including singular covariance).

[F3]

Probabilities are continuous from above for decreasing events (Continuity from above when one set has finite measure).

[F4]

Probability is countably subadditive on sequences of measurable sets (Finite and countable subadditivity of measures).

[F5]

Finite-coordinate cylinders form a generating pi-system: intersections are cylinders on the union of the finite coordinate sets. For two probability laws agreeing on these cylinders, the constant exhaustion by the full space has equal finite mass one, so the measure-uniqueness theorem gives equality on the cylinder sigma-algebra (Measures agreeing on a generating pi-system are equal under an increasing finite-measure exhaustion from that pi-system).

[F6]

Under AC, the characteristic function u↦exp⁡(iuTa−uTΣu/2) uniquely determines Nd(a,Σ), including singular covariance (Characteristic function of a multivariate normal law).

Verification

Given: AC, T=N, mean m(i)=0, covariance k(i,j)=1{i=j}, and the resulting cylinder law with coordinate maps (Zk)k∈N.

1.1F1F2F6givenalgebra

For any finite list of indices ti and real coefficients ai, ∑i,jaiajk(ti,tj)=∑t(∑i:ti=tai)2≥0, so k is positive semidefinite. By [F1], its zero-mean cylinder law has marginal Nd(0,Id) on every set of d distinct coordinates. The independent standard-normal vector in [F2] also has law Nd(0,Id). Their characteristic functions agree by [F6], whose uniqueness assertion identifies the two laws. Thus every finite family of distinct coordinates is independent and standard normal.

2.1F2F3F4step 1.1algebra

Fix N. For M≥N, finite-coordinate independence gives P(∣Zk∣≤1 for all N≤k≤M)=(1−q)M−N+1. These events decrease as M→∞, so [F3] shows P(∣Zk∣≤1 for every k≥N)=0. The event that only finitely many ∣Zk∣ exceed 1 is the countable union over N of these null events; [F4] makes that union null, so almost surely infinitely many coordinates satisfy ∣Zk∣>1.

3.1F5step 2.1algebracontradiction∎

Infinitely many terms of ∑kZk2 exceed 1, hence the sum diverges almost surely. The set ℓ2⊂RN is cylinder-measurable because it equals ⋃m≥1⋂N≥1{∑k≤Nxk2≤m}; its cylinder probability is therefore zero by step 2.1. If an ℓ2-valued Borel random element had these finite-coordinate laws, its coordinate map into RN would be measurable for the cylinder sigma-algebra, so its pushforward would agree with the given cylinder law on every finite-coordinate cylinder. By [F5], the two probability measures are equal; but the pushforward assigns probability one to ℓ2, contradicting its zero cylinder probability. Thus no Borel ℓ2-valued random element, and in particular no tight Borel ℓ2 prior, has these finite-coordinate laws.

ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)Open item page →

A rank-one finite-dimensional Gaussian process is a tight Banach prior

Example

Assume AC.

Take T={1,2}, B=R2, and Z∼N(0,1). Define X1=Z and X2=2Z. This is a singular finite Gaussian process and its coordinate vector is a tight Borel Gaussian random element of B.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

A symmetric positive-semidefinite kernel on a finite index set defines the corresponding Gaussian process law (A mean and positive-semidefinite kernel define a Gaussian process).

[F2]

The standard normal has mean zero, variance one, and density (2π)−1/2e−z2/2 (Standard normal and normal laws, Multivariate normal law, including singular covariance).

[F3]

The covariance operator and RKHS are defined from Cℓ=E[ℓ(W)W] and the covariance quotient norm (Covariance operator and reproducing-kernel Hilbert space of a Banach Gaussian).

[F4]

Probability is continuous from below on increasing events (Continuity from below for measures).

[F5]

The one-dimensional Gaussian integral is ∫Re−cx2dx=π/c for c>0 (The Gaussian integral ∫−∞∞e−x2 dx=π).

Verification

Given: AC, Z∼N(0,1), X=(X1,X2)=(Z,2Z), and B=R2 with its

Euclidean norm.

1.1F1F2givenalgebra

With v=(1,2), the mean is zero and E[XiXj]=vivj. The kernel k(i,j)=vivj is positive semidefinite because for all a1,a2, ∑i,jaiajk(i,j)=(a1+2a2)2≥0. Thus [F1] gives the same possibly singular Gaussian process law as the explicit vector.

1.2F2F4givenchoose

The map z↦(z,2z) is continuous, so its pushforward of the standard normal law is a Borel probability on B. For every positive integer R, the events {∣Z∣≤R} increase to the whole space; continuity from below [F4] therefore lets us choose R with P(∣Z∣≤R)>1−δ. The image segment {(z,2z):∣z∣≤R} is compact and has probability above 1−δ, so the law is tight.

2.1F2F3step 1.1algebra

For ℓa(x)=a1x1+a2x2, ℓa(X)=(a1+2a2)Z, and [F2] gives Cℓa=E[ℓa(X)X]=(a1+2a2)(1,2). The range is exactly span⁡{(1,2)}. If h=c(1,2), then every representative with a1+2a2=c has covariance norm squared E[ℓa(X)2]=c2, so ∥h∥H=∣c∣.

3.1F2F5step 1.1step 2.1algebra∎

The law is concentrated on this line. Every open ball around c(1,2) meets the line in an interval of positive normal probability, while a point outside the line has a sufficiently small ball disjoint from it. Hence the support is the line, equal to the RKHS. Since ∥X∥2=5Z2, [F2] and [F5] give Eea∥X∥2=Ee5aZ2=12π∫Re−(1/2−5a)z2 dz=(1−10a)−1/2<∞ for 0<a<1/10.

Sources