Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The De Rham Complex Homotopy and Mayer Vietoris — Examples

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

These examples calculate de Rham groups and products for points, finite discrete spaces, Euclidean spaces, circles, spheres, and punctured spaces. Explicit angular and volume forms represent generators, with nonzero periods proving nonexactness. The annulus retraction illustrates smooth homotopy invariance, and a circle connecting form displays the second-minus-first Mayer–Vietoris sign. Counterexamples show why closedness and the contravariant order of pullback matter.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

None yet.

5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-10Open item page →

De rham cohomology of a point

Example

The de Rham ring of a point is R in degree zero only.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: M={p} with its zero-dimensional smooth structure.

[F1]

Zero and out of range de rham cohomology: HdRk(M)=0 if k<0 or k>dimM. If M=, its cohomology vanishes in every degree.

[F2]

Zero th de rham cohomology is locally constant functions: HdR0(M) is the algebra of locally constant real functions. For nonempty connected M it is canonically R.

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

A smooth function is uniquely its value at p, so Ω0(M)=R. There are no nonzero cotangent vectors, hence no positive-degree forms, and d=0.

F1given
2.1

The degree-zero quotient has no boundaries, and evaluation at p sends [a][b] to ab and [1] to 1. Thus it is the algebra R; every other group is zero.

F2step 1.1

Source locator

Lee, p.441, the cycle quotient, and Proposition 17.6, p.443, degree zero; the point has no positive-degree forms.

ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-10Open item page →

De rham cohomology of euclidean space

Example

For every n0, HdR(Rn)=R in degree zero only.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Euclidean space with centre 0.

[F1]

Poincare lemma for differential forms on star shaped domains: Every closed smooth k-form on a star-shaped open domain is exact for k1. For centre 0, one primitive is ηx(v1,,vk1)=01tk1ωtx(x,v1,,vk1)dt.

[F2]

Zero th de rham cohomology is locally constant functions: HdR0(M) is the algebra of locally constant real functions. For nonempty connected M it is canonically R.

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

For any closed k-form with k1, the radial primitive is ηx(v1,,vk1)=01tk1ωtx(x,v1,,vk1)dt, and dη=ω. Thus every positive-degree class is zero.

F1given
2.1

Euclidean space is nonempty and connected, so its degree-zero classes are constant functions with their ordinary multiplication. Negative degrees are zero by the complex convention. When n=0, the only form space is the constants on a point, giving the same ring.

F2step 1.1

Source locator

Lee, Theorem 17.14, p.447, Poincaré lemma, and Proposition 17.6, p.443, degree zero.

ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-10Open item page →

De rham cohomology of a finite discrete manifold

Example

An m-point discrete manifold has de Rham ring Rm in degree zero with componentwise multiplication and no other nonzero degrees, including m=0.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: M={1,,m}, m0.

[F1]

De rham cohomology of a finite disjoint union is the direct sum: For a finite disjoint union M=j=1mMj, restrictions give HdRk(M)j=1mHdRk(Mj).

[F2]

Zero th de rham cohomology is locally constant functions: HdR0(M) is the algebra of locally constant real functions. For nonempty connected M it is canonically R.

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

A function is a tuple (a1,,am); every function is locally constant, and each tangent space is zero, so df=0 and all positive-degree form spaces vanish. The quotient has B0=0.

F2given
2.1

Restriction to the finite disjoint points is the direct-sum identification. For tuples a,b, (ab)j=ajbj, so multiplication is coordinatewise. For m=0 this is the zero algebra and for m=1 it is R.

F1step 1.1

Source locator

Lee, Proposition 17.6, p.443, and Proposition 17.5, pp.442–443, disjoint unions; here the union is finite.

ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-10Open item page →

De rham cohomology of the circle from mayer vietoris

Example

Under countable choice, H0(S1)=H1(S1)=R and all other de Rham groups vanish.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Assume countable choice. The unit circle covered by the complements U,V of two opposite points.

[F1]

Mayer vietoris sequence in de rham cohomology: Under countable choice the de Rham Mayer–Vietoris sequence is exact: Hk(M)rHk(U)Hk(V)sHk(UV)δHk+1(M), beginning with 0H0(M).

[F2]

Zero th de rham cohomology is locally constant functions: HdR0(M) is the algebra of locally constant real functions. For nonempty connected M it is canonically R.

[F3]

De rham cohomology of a contractible smooth manifold: Under countable choice, a nonempty contractible smooth manifold has HdR0R and vanishing positive-degree de Rham cohomology.

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

Stereographic projection from the omitted point makes each of U,V diffeomorphic to R. Their overlap has two open-arc components W0,W1, each diffeomorphic to an open interval and hence contractible by linear contraction in that coordinate. F3 makes their positive-degree groups vanish, while F2 identifies their degree-zero groups with constants on components. Thus the initial Mayer–Vietoris segment is 0H0(S1)R2sR2H1(S1)0, where s(a,b)=(ba,ba).

F1F2F3given
2.1

The kernel is {(a,a)} and the image is the diagonal. The functional (c,d)dc has exactly that kernel and is onto, so the cokernel is R. Exactness computes both groups. Degrees above one and negative degrees have zero form spaces.

step 1.1algebra

Source locator

Lee, Theorems 17.20–17.21, pp.449–451; the two-component overlap map is calculated explicitly.

ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-10Open item page →

The angular form generates the first de rham cohomology of the circle

Example

Under countable choice, α=(xdyydx)/(2π)S1 has period one and its class generates HdR1(S1).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Assume countable choice. The counterclockwise oriented unit circle and the displayed one-form.

[F1]

De rham cohomology of spheres: Assume countable choice. For n1, HdRk(Sn) is R in degrees 0,n and zero otherwise. For S0 it is R2 in degree zero and zero otherwise.

[F3]

A nonzero period obstructs exactness and bounding: Let SM be an oriented compact boundaryless embedded k-submanifold, k1, and let ω be a closed smooth k-form on M. If Sω0, then ω is not exact on M, and S cannot be the induced oriented boundary of a compact embedded (k+1)-submanifold of M.

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

The form is smooth and closed because two-forms on a one-manifold vanish. For γ(t)=(cost,sint), 0t2π, substitution gives γα=dt/(2π), hence S1α=1.

givenalgebra
2.1

The circle is compact, oriented, boundaryless and embedded, and the form is closed, so its nonzero period obstructs exactness. Since the sphere theorem gives dimH1(S1)=1, this nonzero class is a basis.

F1F3step 1.1

Source locator

Lee, angular form (17.1), p.441, and Theorem 17.21, pp.450–451; the period is calculated explicitly.

ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-10Open item page →

De rham cohomology of the two sphere

Example

Under countable choice, the sphere S2 has H0=H2=R and H1=0, with all other groups zero.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Assume countable choice. The unit sphere in R3.

[F1]

De rham cohomology of spheres: Assume countable choice. For n1, HdRk(Sn) is R in degrees 0,n and zero otherwise. For S0 it is R2 in degree zero and zero otherwise.

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

Apply F1 with n=2. It gives H0(S2)=H2(S2)=R and H1(S2)=0, with all remaining degrees zero.

F1given
2.1

The same theorem with n=2 gives the constant-function group in degree zero and the zero group in degree one. A product of two degree-two classes has degree four and is zero, so the ring is R[u]/(u2) with u=2.

F1step 1.1

Source locator

Lee, Theorem 17.21, pp.450–451; the degree groups and products are computed for dimension two.

ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-10Open item page →

The standard volume form generates top cohomology of a sphere

Example

Under countable choice, for n1 the form ω=i=1n+1(1)i1xidx1dxi^dxn+1Sn generates Hn(Sn).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Assume countable choice. The outward orientation on the unit sphere.

[F1]

De rham cohomology of spheres: Assume countable choice. For n1, HdRk(Sn) is R in degrees 0,n and zero otherwise. For S0 it is R2 in degree zero and zero otherwise.

[F2]

Nonzero total integral obstructs exactness on a closed manifold: Let Mn be compact, oriented, and boundaryless, n1. A smooth top form ω with Mω0 is not exact. In particular every positive smooth top form on a nonempty such M is not exact.

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

For tangent vectors v1,,vn, expansion along the first column gives ωx(v1,,vn)=det(x,v1,,vn). The outward orientation is precisely the convention that this determinant is positive on positive tangent bases. Since x is a nonzero normal to the tangent space, the determinant is nonzero on every tangent basis; thus ω is smooth, positive and nowhere zero.

givenalgebra
2.1

The sphere is nonempty, compact, oriented and boundaryless, so the positive-top-form clause of the integral obstruction theorem makes ω nonexact. It is closed by top degree. The sphere computation gives a one-dimensional Hn, and its nonzero class therefore generates it.

F1F2step 1.1

Source locator

Lee, Theorem 17.21, pp.450–451, and Proposition 16.28, p.422, positivity of volume integration; the proof verifies nonexactness by the stated Stokes supplier.

ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-10Open item page →

De rham cohomology of punctured three space

Example

Under countable choice, R3{0} has de Rham cohomology R in degrees zero and two only.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Assume countable choice. The punctured three-dimensional Euclidean space.

[F1]

De rham cohomology of punctured euclidean space: Under countable choice, Rn{0} has cohomology R in degrees 0,n1 only for n2. For n=1 it has R2 in degree zero only, and for n=0 all groups vanish.

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

The radial map r(x)=x/x retracts onto S2. The homotopy F(x,t)=((1t)+t/x)x has norm (1t)x+t>0; it begins at x, ends at r(x) and fixes points of S2.

givenalgebra
2.1

This is the n=3 instance of the punctured-space theorem, so its only nonzero groups are H0=H2=R. Products of positive-degree classes vanish because their degree is at least four.

F1step 1.1

Source locator

Lee, Corollary 17.23, p.451; the radial maps and the degree-two generator are displayed in the verification.

ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-10Open item page →

Homotopy equivalent annulus and circle have isomorphic de rham rings

Example

Under countable choice, the annulus A={xR2:a<x<b}, where 0<a<1<b, and S1 have isomorphic de Rham graded algebras.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Assume countable choice. Inclusion i:S1A and r:AS1, r(x)=x/x.

[F1]

De rham cohomology is smooth homotopy invariant: A smooth homotopy equivalence induces an isomorphism of de Rham graded real algebras.

[F2]

Pullback is a homomorphism of de rham cohomology algebras: Smooth pullback induces a unital graded real algebra homomorphism HdR(N)HdR(M).

[F3]

De rham cohomology of spheres: Assume countable choice. For n1, HdRk(Sn) is R in degrees 0,n and zero otherwise. For S0 it is R2 in degree zero and zero otherwise.

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

The homotopy F(x,t)=((1t)+t/x)x has radius (1t)x+t, between x and 1, hence strictly between a and b. It is smooth, fixes the unit circle, and connects the identity to ir; also ri=id.

givenalgebra
2.1

Thus i,r are inverse graded algebra homomorphisms by smooth homotopy invariance. The sphere computation gives one generator u in degree one and the unit in degree zero; u2=0 because H2(S1)=0. The annulus has the same multiplication, so its ring is the exterior algebra on one degree-one generator.

F1F2F3step 1.1

Source locator

Lee, Proposition 17.10 and Theorem 17.11, pp.445–446; the annulus retraction and its radial homotopy are explicit.

CounterexampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-10Open item page →

The closed angular form on the punctured plane is not exact

Statement refuted

Every closed smooth one-form on the punctured plane is exact.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The witness α=(ydx+xdy)/(x2+y2) on R2{0}.

[F1]

Closed and exact differential forms: For the complex def-de-rham-cochain-complex, put Zk(M)=ker(d:Ωk(M)Ωk+1(M)) and Bk(M)=im(d:Ωk1(M)Ωk(M)). A form is closed if it belongs to Zk and exact if it belongs to Bk. If ω=dη, then dω=d2η=0 by thm-the-exterior-derivative-squares-to-zero, so BkZk. In particular B0=0, since Ω1=0. The zero form is both closed and exact in every degree.

[F2]

The local coordinate formula for the exterior derivative: Let (U,x1,,xn) be a smooth chart on a smooth manifold and ω a smooth k-form on U, with k0. Summing over increasing k-tuples I, and writing dxI=dxi1dxik, if ω=IωIdxI, then dω=IdωIdxI.

[F4]

Newton–Leibniz needs only continuity on [a,b], differentiability on (a,b), and a Riemann-integrable extension of the interior derivative: Let a<b. Suppose G:[a,b]R is continuous on [a,b] and differentiable on (a,b). If f:[a,b]R is Riemann integrable and f(x)=G(x)(a<x<b), then abf=G(b)G(a). No derivative of G at either endpoint is assumed, and the two endpoint values assigned to the integrable extension f do not enter the conclusion.

Counterexample

technique · direct
1.1

The denominator is positive. Writing its coefficients as a=y/(x2+y2) and b=x/(x2+y2) gives xb=ya=(y2x2)/(x2+y2)2. Hence dα=(xbya)dxdy=0.

F1F2given
2.1

On γ(t)=(cost,sint), γα=dt and its integral is 2π. If α=df, then the chain rule and the fundamental theorem would make this integral f(γ(2π))f(γ(0))=0. Thus the closed witness is not exact.

F4step 1.1

Source locator

Lee, angular form (17.1), p.441; the zero derivative and nonzero loop period are calculated above by Newton–Leibniz.

CounterexampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-10Open item page →

The pullback on cohomology reverses composition order

Statement refuted

Pullback composition can be treated as covariant, so (GF)=GF.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: X={1,2,3} discrete, F=(12), G=(23), and u=1{1}.

[F1]

De rham cohomology is a contravariant functor: De Rham cohomology is contravariant: for smooth F:MN and G:NP, (GF)=FG, and idM=idHk(M).

[F2]

Zero th de rham cohomology is locally constant functions: HdR0(M) is the algebra of locally constant real functions. For nonempty connected M it is canonically R.

Counterexample

technique · direct
1.1

All functions are locally constant, hence identify with their H0 classes. At the point 2, FGu=uGF has value u(1)=1, whereas GFu=uFG has value u(3)=0.

F2givenalgebra
2.1

The actual functoriality identity is (GF)=FG, so the two displayed values refute the proposed covariant ordering even when all sources and targets coincide.

F1step 1.1

Source locator

Lee, Proposition 17.2(a) and Corollary 17.3, p.442; the noncommuting finite permutations are computed explicitly.

ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-10Open item page →

An explicit mayer vietoris connecting form on the circle

Example

Under countable choice the circle Mayer–Vietoris connector has a nonzero representative obtained from a locally constant overlap function.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Assume countable choice. Let U,V be complements of opposite circle points, let UV=W0W1, and let ω equal 0 on W0 and 1 on W1.

[F1]

Explicit de rham mayer vietoris connecting class: Under countable choice, for a closed k-form ω on UV, δ[ω]=[η], where ηU=d(ρVω) and ηV=d(ρUω), with products smoothly extended by zero as in the lift construction. This class is independent of partition, lift and representative.

[F2]

Zero th de rham cohomology is locally constant functions: HdR0(M) is the algebra of locally constant real functions. For nonempty connected M it is canonically R.

[F3]

Mayer vietoris sequence in de rham cohomology: Under countable choice the de Rham Mayer–Vietoris sequence is exact: Hk(M)rHk(U)Hk(V)sHk(UV)δHk+1(M), beginning with 0H0(M).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

Take a subordinate partition ρU+ρV=1. The local forms ηU=d(ρVω) and ηV=d(ρUω) glue by the connector formula. Explicitly η=0 on W0 and η=dρU=dρV on W1, with the prescribed smooth zero extensions at the removed points. Thus [η]=δ[(0,1)].

F1given
2.1

The degree-zero groups on U,V are constants, whose difference on the two overlap components is (ba,ba). The vector (0,1) is not diagonal, since equality to (c,c) would require c=0 and c=1. Exactness of the Mayer–Vietoris sequence defining this connector therefore gives δ[(0,1)]0.

F2F3step 1.1

Source locator

Lee, Theorem 17.20, pp.449–450, proof pp.462–463; the sign here is second restriction minus first, and the connecting representative is calculated with that convention.

Sources