How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The De Rham Complex Homotopy and Mayer Vietoris — Examples
1 · Prerequisites
- Abelian Categories
- Absolute and Conditional Convergence; Rearrangement; Products
- Binary Operations, Monoids, Groups and Subgroups
- Cardinal Arithmetic, Cofinality and the Alephs
- Categories, Functors and Natural Transformations
- Chain Complexes and Homology
- Chain Homotopy and the Homotopy Category
- Compactness
- Compactness in Metric Spaces
- Completeness, Completion, and Uniform Continuity
- Connectedness
- Construction of the Natural Numbers
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Cauchy Sequences
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Dedekind Cuts
- Continuity, IVT, EVT, and Uniform Continuity
- Cosets, Index and Lagrange's Theorem
- Countability and Uncountability
- Countability Axioms and Cardinal Functions
- Determinants of Matrices over a Commutative Ring
- Divisibility, Euclidean Domains, Principal Ideal Domains and Unique Factorisation
- Dual Spaces, Bilinear and Quadratic Forms, and Sylvester's Law of Inertia
- Euclidean Ordinary Differential Equations with Smooth Dependence
- Exactness and the Member Calculus
- Exterior Powers, Orientation and Hodge Duality
- Filters and Ultrafilters
- Finite Counting, Factorials and Binomial Coefficients
- Foundations of the Real Numbers for Analysis
- Fubini and Change of Variables
- Gaussian Elimination, Elementary Matrices and Reduced Row Echelon Form
- Group Actions, Orbits, Stabilisers and Cayley's Theorem
- Group Homomorphisms and the Isomorphism Theorems
- Hereditary and Productive Behaviour of the Separation Axioms
- Homotopy and Homotopy Equivalence
- Ideals, Quotient Rings and the Isomorphism Theorems for Rings
- Inner Product Spaces, Gram-Schmidt, Projections and Adjoints
- Integration of Forms and the General Stokes Theorem
- Limits and Colimits
- Limits of Real Functions
- limsup, liminf, and Subsequential Limits
- Line Integrals and the Gradient Theorem
- Linear Independence, Bases and Dimension
- Linear Transformations, Rank-Nullity and Quotient Spaces
- Long Exact Sequences in Homology
- Manifolds with Boundary Collars and Orientations
- Matrices, the Matrix of a Linear Map, and Change of Basis
- Metric Spaces
- Mixed Partials, Taylor Formulae, and Extrema
- Modules, Submodules, Quotient Modules and the Isomorphism Theorems
- Monotone Functions, Discontinuities, and Continuity Sets
- Monotone Sequences, Bolzano-Weierstrass, and Cauchy Completeness
- Normal Subgroups and Quotient Groups
- Order, Zorn's Lemma, and the Axiom of Choice
- Ordinal Arithmetic and the First Uncountable Ordinal
- Ordinals, Cardinals, and Transfinite Recursion
- Partitions of Unity and Paracompactness
- Picard-Lindelöf and First-Order Ordinary Differential Equations
- Polynomial Rings, the Division Algorithm and Roots
- Power Series and Real-Analytic Functions
- Preadditive and Additive Categories and Biproducts
- Properties of the Integral and the Working FTC
- Rank Theorems and Embedded Submanifolds
- Reflective Subcategories and the Adjoint Functor Theorems
- Relations, Functions, and Quotients
- Rings, Subrings, Integral Domains and Fields
- Rⁿ as a Normed Space; Vector-Valued Functions
- Roots, Rational Powers, and Classical Inequalities
- Separation Axioms: the Hierarchy
- Sequences and Limits
- Sequences and Series of Functions; Uniform Convergence
- Series: Convergence and the Nonnegative Tests
- Simple Field Extensions and the Construction of the Complex Numbers
- Smooth Manifolds and Smooth Maps
- Smooth Partitions of Unity and Exhaustions
- Smooth Vector Bundles and Sections
- Subspaces, Products, and Quotients
- Suprema and Infima
- Symmetric Groups, Cycle Decomposition and the Sign Homomorphism
- Tangent Cotangent and the Differential
- Tensor Fields Exterior Algebra and Differential Forms
- The De Rham Complex Homotopy and Mayer Vietoris
- The Derivative and the Mean Value Theorems
- The Determinant of a Linear Operator, Cofactors and Cramer's Rule
- The Diagram Lemmas in an Abelian Category
- The Exponential Function
- The Exterior Derivative and Cartan Calculus
- The Fundamental Theorems of Calculus
- The Inverse and Implicit Function Theorems
- The Inverse Function Theorem Completed
- The Riemann Integral in Rᵐ and Jordan Content
- The Riemann Integral: Definition and Integrability
- The Topology of Euclidean Space
- The Total Derivative in ℝᵐ → ℝⁿ
- The ZFC Axioms and the Basic Set Constructions
- Topological Spaces and Continuity
- Topology of ℝ
- Universal Properties, Representables and the Yoneda Lemma
- Vector Fields Flows and Lie Derivatives
- Vector Spaces, Linear Subspaces, Span and Direct Sums
- Whitney Embedding Tubular Neighbourhoods and Approximation
2 · Summary
These examples calculate de Rham groups and products for points, finite discrete spaces, Euclidean spaces, circles, spheres, and punctured spaces. Explicit angular and volume forms represent generators, with nonzero periods proving nonexactness. The annulus retraction illustrates smooth homotopy invariance, and a circle connecting form displays the second-minus-first Mayer–Vietoris sign. Counterexamples show why closedness and the contravariant order of pullback matter.
3 · Logical flowchart
4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs
None yet.
5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements
De rham cohomology of a point
Example
The de Rham ring of a point is in degree zero only.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: with its zero-dimensional smooth structure.
Zero and out of range de rham cohomology: if or . If , its cohomology vanishes in every degree.
Zero th de rham cohomology is locally constant functions: is the algebra of locally constant real functions. For nonempty connected it is canonically .
Verification
A smooth function is uniquely its value at , so . There are no nonzero cotangent vectors, hence no positive-degree forms, and .
The degree-zero quotient has no boundaries, and evaluation at sends to and to . Thus it is the algebra ; every other group is zero.
Source locator
Lee, p.441, the cycle quotient, and Proposition 17.6, p.443, degree zero; the point has no positive-degree forms.
De rham cohomology of euclidean space
Example
For every , in degree zero only.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Euclidean space with centre .
Poincare lemma for differential forms on star shaped domains: Every closed smooth -form on a star-shaped open domain is exact for . For centre , one primitive is .
Zero th de rham cohomology is locally constant functions: is the algebra of locally constant real functions. For nonempty connected it is canonically .
Verification
For any closed -form with , the radial primitive is , and . Thus every positive-degree class is zero.
Euclidean space is nonempty and connected, so its degree-zero classes are constant functions with their ordinary multiplication. Negative degrees are zero by the complex convention. When , the only form space is the constants on a point, giving the same ring.
Source locator
Lee, Theorem 17.14, p.447, Poincaré lemma, and Proposition 17.6, p.443, degree zero.
De rham cohomology of a finite discrete manifold
Example
An -point discrete manifold has de Rham ring in degree zero with componentwise multiplication and no other nonzero degrees, including .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: , .
De rham cohomology of a finite disjoint union is the direct sum: For a finite disjoint union , restrictions give .
Zero th de rham cohomology is locally constant functions: is the algebra of locally constant real functions. For nonempty connected it is canonically .
Verification
A function is a tuple ; every function is locally constant, and each tangent space is zero, so and all positive-degree form spaces vanish. The quotient has .
Restriction to the finite disjoint points is the direct-sum identification. For tuples , , so multiplication is coordinatewise. For this is the zero algebra and for it is .
Source locator
Lee, Proposition 17.6, p.443, and Proposition 17.5, pp.442–443, disjoint unions; here the union is finite.
De rham cohomology of the circle from mayer vietoris
Example
Under countable choice, and all other de Rham groups vanish.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Assume countable choice. The unit circle covered by the complements of two opposite points.
Mayer vietoris sequence in de rham cohomology: Under countable choice the de Rham Mayer–Vietoris sequence is exact: , beginning with .
Zero th de rham cohomology is locally constant functions: is the algebra of locally constant real functions. For nonempty connected it is canonically .
De rham cohomology of a contractible smooth manifold: Under countable choice, a nonempty contractible smooth manifold has and vanishing positive-degree de Rham cohomology.
Verification
Stereographic projection from the omitted point makes each of diffeomorphic to . Their overlap has two open-arc components , each diffeomorphic to an open interval and hence contractible by linear contraction in that coordinate. F3 makes their positive-degree groups vanish, while F2 identifies their degree-zero groups with constants on components. Thus the initial Mayer–Vietoris segment is , where .
The kernel is and the image is the diagonal. The functional has exactly that kernel and is onto, so the cokernel is . Exactness computes both groups. Degrees above one and negative degrees have zero form spaces.
Source locator
Lee, Theorems 17.20–17.21, pp.449–451; the two-component overlap map is calculated explicitly.
The angular form generates the first de rham cohomology of the circle
Example
Under countable choice, has period one and its class generates .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Assume countable choice. The counterclockwise oriented unit circle and the displayed one-form.
De rham cohomology of spheres: Assume countable choice. For , is in degrees and zero otherwise. For it is in degree zero and zero otherwise.
A nonzero period obstructs exactness and bounding: Let be an oriented compact boundaryless embedded -submanifold, , and let be a closed smooth -form on . If , then is not exact on , and cannot be the induced oriented boundary of a compact embedded -submanifold of .
Verification
The form is smooth and closed because two-forms on a one-manifold vanish. For , , substitution gives , hence .
The circle is compact, oriented, boundaryless and embedded, and the form is closed, so its nonzero period obstructs exactness. Since the sphere theorem gives , this nonzero class is a basis.
Source locator
Lee, angular form (17.1), p.441, and Theorem 17.21, pp.450–451; the period is calculated explicitly.
De rham cohomology of the two sphere
Example
Under countable choice, the sphere has and , with all other groups zero.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Assume countable choice. The unit sphere in .
De rham cohomology of spheres: Assume countable choice. For , is in degrees and zero otherwise. For it is in degree zero and zero otherwise.
Verification
Apply F1 with . It gives and , with all remaining degrees zero.
The same theorem with gives the constant-function group in degree zero and the zero group in degree one. A product of two degree-two classes has degree four and is zero, so the ring is with .
Source locator
Lee, Theorem 17.21, pp.450–451; the degree groups and products are computed for dimension two.
The standard volume form generates top cohomology of a sphere
Example
Under countable choice, for the form generates .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Assume countable choice. The outward orientation on the unit sphere.
De rham cohomology of spheres: Assume countable choice. For , is in degrees and zero otherwise. For it is in degree zero and zero otherwise.
Nonzero total integral obstructs exactness on a closed manifold: Let be compact, oriented, and boundaryless, . A smooth top form with is not exact. In particular every positive smooth top form on a nonempty such is not exact.
Verification
For tangent vectors , expansion along the first column gives . The outward orientation is precisely the convention that this determinant is positive on positive tangent bases. Since is a nonzero normal to the tangent space, the determinant is nonzero on every tangent basis; thus is smooth, positive and nowhere zero.
The sphere is nonempty, compact, oriented and boundaryless, so the positive-top-form clause of the integral obstruction theorem makes nonexact. It is closed by top degree. The sphere computation gives a one-dimensional , and its nonzero class therefore generates it.
Source locator
Lee, Theorem 17.21, pp.450–451, and Proposition 16.28, p.422, positivity of volume integration; the proof verifies nonexactness by the stated Stokes supplier.
De rham cohomology of punctured three space
Example
Under countable choice, has de Rham cohomology in degrees zero and two only.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Assume countable choice. The punctured three-dimensional Euclidean space.
De rham cohomology of punctured euclidean space: Under countable choice, has cohomology in degrees only for . For it has in degree zero only, and for all groups vanish.
Verification
The radial map retracts onto . The homotopy has norm ; it begins at , ends at and fixes points of .
This is the instance of the punctured-space theorem, so its only nonzero groups are . Products of positive-degree classes vanish because their degree is at least four.
Source locator
Lee, Corollary 17.23, p.451; the radial maps and the degree-two generator are displayed in the verification.
Homotopy equivalent annulus and circle have isomorphic de rham rings
Example
Under countable choice, the annulus , where , and have isomorphic de Rham graded algebras.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Assume countable choice. Inclusion and , .
De rham cohomology is smooth homotopy invariant: A smooth homotopy equivalence induces an isomorphism of de Rham graded real algebras.
Pullback is a homomorphism of de rham cohomology algebras: Smooth pullback induces a unital graded real algebra homomorphism .
De rham cohomology of spheres: Assume countable choice. For , is in degrees and zero otherwise. For it is in degree zero and zero otherwise.
Verification
The homotopy has radius , between and , hence strictly between and . It is smooth, fixes the unit circle, and connects the identity to ; also .
Thus are inverse graded algebra homomorphisms by smooth homotopy invariance. The sphere computation gives one generator in degree one and the unit in degree zero; because . The annulus has the same multiplication, so its ring is the exterior algebra on one degree-one generator.
Source locator
Lee, Proposition 17.10 and Theorem 17.11, pp.445–446; the annulus retraction and its radial homotopy are explicit.
The closed angular form on the punctured plane is not exact
Statement refuted
Every closed smooth one-form on the punctured plane is exact.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The witness on .
Closed and exact differential forms: For the complex def-de-rham-cochain-complex, put and . A form is closed if it belongs to and exact if it belongs to . If , then by thm-the-exterior-derivative-squares-to-zero, so . In particular , since . The zero form is both closed and exact in every degree.
The local coordinate formula for the exterior derivative: Let be a smooth chart on a smooth manifold and a smooth -form on , with . Summing over increasing -tuples , and writing , if , then
Newton–Leibniz needs only continuity on , differentiability on , and a Riemann-integrable extension of the interior derivative: Let . Suppose is continuous on and differentiable on . If is Riemann integrable and then No derivative of at either endpoint is assumed, and the two endpoint values assigned to the integrable extension do not enter the conclusion.
Counterexample
The denominator is positive. Writing its coefficients as and gives . Hence .
On , and its integral is . If , then the chain rule and the fundamental theorem would make this integral . Thus the closed witness is not exact.
Source locator
Lee, angular form (17.1), p.441; the zero derivative and nonzero loop period are calculated above by Newton–Leibniz.
The pullback on cohomology reverses composition order
Statement refuted
Pullback composition can be treated as covariant, so .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: discrete, , , and .
De rham cohomology is a contravariant functor: De Rham cohomology is contravariant: for smooth and , , and .
Zero th de rham cohomology is locally constant functions: is the algebra of locally constant real functions. For nonempty connected it is canonically .
Counterexample
All functions are locally constant, hence identify with their classes. At the point , has value , whereas has value .
The actual functoriality identity is , so the two displayed values refute the proposed covariant ordering even when all sources and targets coincide.
Source locator
Lee, Proposition 17.2(a) and Corollary 17.3, p.442; the noncommuting finite permutations are computed explicitly.
An explicit mayer vietoris connecting form on the circle
Example
Under countable choice the circle Mayer–Vietoris connector has a nonzero representative obtained from a locally constant overlap function.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Assume countable choice. Let be complements of opposite circle points, let , and let equal on and on .
Explicit de rham mayer vietoris connecting class: Under countable choice, for a closed -form on , , where and , with products smoothly extended by zero as in the lift construction. This class is independent of partition, lift and representative.
Zero th de rham cohomology is locally constant functions: is the algebra of locally constant real functions. For nonempty connected it is canonically .
Mayer vietoris sequence in de rham cohomology: Under countable choice the de Rham Mayer–Vietoris sequence is exact: , beginning with .
Verification
Take a subordinate partition . The local forms and glue by the connector formula. Explicitly on and on , with the prescribed smooth zero extensions at the removed points. Thus .
The degree-zero groups on are constants, whose difference on the two overlap components is . The vector is not diagonal, since equality to would require and . Exactness of the Mayer–Vietoris sequence defining this connector therefore gives .
Source locator
Lee, Theorem 17.20, pp.449–450, proof pp.462–463; the sign here is second restriction minus first, and the connecting representative is calculated with that convention.