Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Skein modules for links in 3-manifolds — Examples and Counterexamples

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Logical flowchart

3 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

None yet.

4 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

CounterexampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

Forgetting framing identifies distinct skein classes

Statement refuted

Assume the Axiom of Choice and let R=Z[A±1]. The assertion that the Kauffman bracket skein module can be formed from unframed link-isotopy classes without changing its classes is false. In S3, a zero-framed trivial circle and the same circle with one positive full framing twist have distinct skein classes. In a solid torus, a zero-framed core and the same core with one positive full framing twist also have distinct skein classes. In each pair the underlying unframed embedded link is identical.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Choice, the framed Kauffman bracket skein modules of S3 and a solid torus, and the two pairs of framed links in the statement.

[A1]

The Axiom of Choice, written AC (The Axiom of Choice).

[A2]

Countable choice, written ACω, means every countable family of nonempty sets has a choice function (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

[A3]

In ZF, AC implies ACω (AC implies DC implies countable choice).

[F1]

The positive full twist multiplies any link-component class by −A3; on the two basis classes in the examples the resulting changes are nonzero (Framing transport and compatible collar actions under oriented diffeomorphisms).

[F2]

The S³ empty class is a free basis and a zero-framed trivial circle represents δ[∅] (The Kauffman bracket skein module of S³ is rank one).

[F3]

The solid-torus core classes form a free R-basis, including [z] (The solid-torus skein module has a core-multicurve basis).

Proof

1.1A1A2A3F1F2givenalgebra

In KA(S3) the zero-framed trivial circle has class δ[∅] by [F2]. Its positive framing twist has class −A3δ[∅] by [F1]. These are unequal by the nonzero calculation in the framing-and-boundary lemma and the basis assertion [F2].

2.1A1F1F3step 1.1algebra∎

In the solid torus, the zero-framed core has class [z] and its positive full framing twist has class −A3[z] by [F1]. Since [z] is an element of a free basis by [F3] and −A3−1 is a nonzero Laurent polynomial, the two skein classes differ. Their underlying embedded core circle is unchanged when the framing decoration is forgotten. The S³ pair has the same underlying unframed circle, so forgetting the framing identifies both pairs while the framed skein classes remain unequal.

ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

The empty link, trivial circle, and annular core multicurves

Example

Assume the Axiom of Choice and let R=Z[A±1] and δ=−A2−A−2. In KA(S3), a zero-framed trivial circle equals δ times the empty-link generator. In the solid-torus module, one and two parallel blackboard-framed core curves have classes [z] and [z2], which are distinct basis elements. If an annulus is specified as a boundary subsurface of the solid torus with a product collar, its closed-link skein module acts on the solid-torus module by gluing framed links into that collar. The schematic shows the one-core and two-core representatives; every curve between the annulus boundary circles carries its blackboard framing.

onecore:ztwocores:z2

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Choice, the S³ and solid-torus skein modules, and a chosen annular subsurface with a product collar in the solid-torus boundary.

[A1]

The Axiom of Choice, written AC (The Axiom of Choice).

[A2]

Countable choice, written ACω, means every countable family of nonempty sets has a choice function (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

[A3]

In ZF, AC implies ACω (AC implies DC implies countable choice).

[F1]

The module definition imposes the zero-framed trivial-circle relation [L⊔O]=δ[L] (Kauffman bracket skein module of a three-manifold).

[F2]

The empty link is a free basis of the S³ module and [O]=δ[∅] (The Kauffman bracket skein module of S³ is rank one).

[F3]

The parallel blackboard-framed core classes form a free basis of the solid-torus module (The solid-torus skein module has a core-multicurve basis).

[F4]

A specified product collar carries a unital closed-link skein action by gluing and disjoint union (Functoriality and boundary-collar action for the three-manifold skein quotient).

Proof

1.1A1A2A3F1F2algebra

Substitute the empty link for L in the trivial-circle relation [F1] to get [O]=δ[∅]; [F2] identifies [∅] as the generator of the free rank-one module.

2.1A1F3F4givenalgebra∎

By [F3], the core multicurves [z] and [z2] are distinct basis vectors and are linearly independent over R. The collar action in [F4] applies to the chosen annular boundary subsurface and is defined by placing a closed framed link in a thin collar layer and taking its union with the interior link; thus it adds the indicated operation without adding boundary endpoints.

Sources