Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Skein modules for links in 3-manifolds

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Logical flowchart

3 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicableverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

Kauffman bracket skein module of a three-manifold

Definition

Let M be a smooth oriented 3-manifold, and put R=Z[A±1] and δ=−A2−A−2. A framed unoriented link in M is a finite disjoint union of smoothly embedded annuli S1×[−1,1] in the interior of M, considered up to ambient isotopy through such framed annuli; the empty union is allowed. Let Lfr(M) be the set of these isotopy classes and let FR(M) be the free R-module with basis Lfr(M).

For the local crossing relation, choose an orientation-preserving chart from a closed 3-ball in M to a standard ball in R3, and project to the first two coordinates. In the displayed chart the over-strand runs from the southwest endpoint to the northeast endpoint, and the under-strand runs from the northwest endpoint to the southeast endpoint. The A-smoothing pairs the two left endpoints and the two right endpoints, and the B-smoothing pairs the two top endpoints and the two bottom endpoints. All three local tangles, including the crossing strands, carry the blackboard framing of the displayed projection, with no additional framing twists. Their framed strips coincide in a collar of the four endpoints.

crossingA-smoothing,weightAB-smoothing,weightA¡1

For each such local triple, the three framed links agree outside the chart. Let RA(M) be the submodule of FR(M) generated by [L×]−A[LA]−A−1[LB] for all crossing triples, and by [L⊔O]−δ[L] for every framed link L, where O is a zero-framed trivial circle bounding a disk in a ball disjoint from L. The Kauffman bracket skein module of M is

KA(M):=FR(M)/RA(M).

The relations are imposed on framed link classes; no unframed type-I identification is added.

LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

Full framing twists in the Kauffman bracket skein module

Statement

Let M be a smooth oriented 3-manifold and let L be a framed unoriented link in its interior with a specified component. A positive full framing twist is the local blackboard curl whose A-smoothing is the straight strip with one additional zero-framed trivial circle; a negative full framing twist is the curl whose B-smoothing is the straight strip with one additional zero-framed trivial circle. Write L+ and L− for the links obtained by inserting these twists on one component. With R=Z[A±1] and δ=−A2−A−2, the module classes satisfy

[L+]=−A3[L],[L−]=−A−3[L].

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A smooth oriented 3-manifold M, a framed unoriented link L in its interior, and the two local full-twist insertions from the Statement.

[F1]

A crossing triple in KA(M) satisfies [L×]=A[LA]+A−1[LB], and adjoining a zero-framed trivial circle multiplies a class by δ (Kauffman bracket skein module of a three-manifold).

[F2]

The loop value is δ=−A2−A−2 and the coefficients of the two smoothings are A and A−1 (Kauffman bracket smoothing and loop value).

Proof

1.1F1F2givenalgebra

In the positive curl from the Statement, the A-smoothing is L with one zero-framed trivial circle and the B-smoothing is L. By [F1] and [F2], [L+]=Aδ[L]+A−1[L]=(A(−A2−A−2)+A−1)[L]=−A3[L].

2.1F1F2step 1.1algebra∎

In the negative curl, the A-smoothing is L and the B-smoothing is L with one zero-framed trivial circle. Hence [L−]=A[L]+A−1δ[L]=(A+A−1(−A2−A−2))[L]=−A−3[L]. These are equalities in the framed-link quotient and use no ambient-isotopy identification that forgets the framing.

LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

Functoriality and boundary-collar action for the three-manifold skein quotient

Statement

Let M and N be smooth oriented 3-manifolds, and let f:M→N be an orientation-preserving diffeomorphism. Then [L]↦[f(L)] induces an R-module isomorphism f∗:KA(M)→KA(N). These maps respect identity diffeomorphisms and composition.

Let Σ be a compact oriented surface with a specified product collar ι:Σ×[0,1]↪M whose lower face lies in ∂M. Give Σ×[0,1] the orientation pulled back from M by ι; the skein module and stacking product below use this orientation. The stacking product on KA(Σ×[0,1]) and collar gluing define a unital left action on KA(M): a closed framed link in the surface product is placed in a sufficiently thin outer subcollar and united with a framed link in the interior of M. The action is independent of the thin-collar width, associative, and natural under orientation-preserving diffeomorphisms that respect the specified collars. Only closed framed links are glued; no relative boundary endpoints are part of this action.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Smooth oriented 3-manifolds M,N, an orientation-preserving diffeomorphism f:M→N, an oriented surface collar in ∂M, and the Kauffman bracket skein quotients defined above.

[F1]

The free module is generated by framed unoriented link isotopy classes; its relation submodule is generated by the local crossing relation and the zero-framed trivial-circle relation with R=Z[A±1] and δ=−A2−A−2 (Kauffman bracket skein module of a three-manifold, Kauffman bracket smoothing and loop value).

[F2]

The collar product is oriented by pullback under ι, so its embedding carries each defining crossing and trivial-circle relation to the identical relation in M (Kauffman bracket skein module of a three-manifold).

Proof

1.1F1givenconstruct

Define f~:FR(M)→FR(N) on basis elements by f~([L])=[f(L)] and extend R-linearly. A diffeomorphism sends ambient-isotopic framed annuli to ambient-isotopic framed annuli and sends the framing annuli by its derivative, so this is well-defined on the free modules.

1.2F1F2givenconstruct

Fix framed-link representatives P in Σ×(0,1) and L in the interior of M. To check independence of isotopy representatives, take any isotopy track of either framed link. Its framing annuli have compact trace in the interior. Place the trace of the product-factor link in a sufficiently thin outer collar layer disjoint from the trace of the M-factor link. The disjoint-union family is a smooth isotopy of framed annuli in M. In finitely many submanifold charts of its compact trace, extend the annulus velocity to ambient charts with cutoffs and combine these extensions with a partition of unity; the resulting compactly supported time-dependent vector field has a flow that realizes this isotopy by ambient diffeomorphisms. Thus the union class is independent of both representatives. For the quotient relations, rescale P into a boundary layer disjoint from L. A change of P by either defining relation becomes the identical local relation after the collar embedding by [F2]; a change of L by either relation remains the identical relation with the disjoint collar link outside its ball. The same local check in two successive collar layers shows that stacking descends to the skein quotients. Hence collar gluing gives a bilinear action. Decreasing the collar width uses an orientation-preserving product rescaling isotopy supported in a thin boundary layer and disjoint from L, so the resulting skein class is unchanged.

2.1F1F2step 1.1algebra

The image of an oriented crossing ball is an oriented ball. Its transported chart preserves the over/under crossing and both endpoint pairings, so f~([L×]−A[LA]−A−1[LB]) is the corresponding defining relation in N. A zero-framed trivial circle bounding a disk in the ball maps to another zero-framed trivial circle bounding the image disk. Thus f~(RA(M))⊆RA(N) and f~ descends to f∗. Applying the same construction to f−1 gives the inverse; applying it to a composite gives the composite map on every link generator.

3.1F1F2step 1.2algebra∎

Place two algebra links in successive subcollars and the M-link deeper inside. Both (P∗Q)⋅L and P⋅(Q⋅L) are represented by the same ordered union, up to an orientation-preserving product rescaling, and the empty link acts as the identity. Thus the action is associative and unital. If an orientation-preserving diffeomorphism carries one specified collar productwise to another, it sends each stacked or glued link union to the corresponding union, so its module maps intertwine the actions.

LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

Annular state expansion for the Kauffman bracket skein module

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let A be a planar annulus and identify the solid torus with A×[−1,1]. Let R=Z[A±1], δ=−A2−A−2, and let z be a formal polynomial variable. For a regular annular diagram D, a state S smooths every crossing. Let a(S) and b(S) count its A- and B-smoothings, let u(S) count the resulting circles that bound disks in A, and let e(S) count the resulting circles that do not bound disks in A; call a circle that does not bound a disk essential. If m is the total full-twist correction from the blackboard framing to the specified framing, counting an A-type twist positively and its inverse negatively as in the framed diagram calculus, set

Ψ(D,m)=(−A3)m∑SAa(S)−b(S)δu(S)ze(S).

This value is independent of the regular annular diagram and twist correction of the framed link and induces an R-linear map

Ψ:KA(A×[−1,1])⟶R[z].

For the empty link, the empty diagram has its unique empty state and the formula gives Ψ(∅)=1.

The diagram below shows one essential core curve and one contractible circle in an annular state; every smoothed component is classified by these two types.

z°essentialcoreandcontractiblecircle

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Choice, a framed link in the solid torus A×[−1,1], and a regular annular diagram with its full-twist correction.

[A1]

The Axiom of Choice, written AC (The Axiom of Choice).

[A2]

Countable choice, written ACω, means every countable family of nonempty sets has a choice function (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

[A3]

In ZF, AC implies ACω (AC implies DC implies countable choice).

[F1]

At a crossing, the Kauffman bracket state sum uses the A-smoothing with weight A, the B-smoothing with weight A−1, and the loop value δ=−A2−A−2 (Kauffman bracket smoothing and loop value).

[F2]

The module is generated by framed-link classes modulo the crossing and trivial-circle relations (Kauffman bracket skein module of a three-manifold).

[F3]

Every framed link in the solid-torus product admits a regular annular diagram with signed full-twist correction marks, and framed isotopies of links are represented by annular planar isotopies and finitely many R1, R2, and R3 moves; R1 changes the blackboard twist correction by the opposite unit (Framed link diagrams and local Reidemeister moves in plane products).

[F4]

In the fixed source-chart convention, the crossing operators cancel under R2 and satisfy the three-strand braid relation under R3; these are equalities of local Temperley–Lieb tangles (Kauffman bracket R2 and R3 identities).

[F5]

For two disjoint smoothly embedded circles in S2, the complement consists of two open disks and a unique open annulus bounded by the circles (Two disjoint circles in the two-sphere cobound an annulus).

Proof

1.1A1F1F5givencasesconstruct

Let Bi and Bo be the inner and outer boundary circles of the planar annulus. For any embedded state circle C, apply [F5] to C and Bi. Their complement has a disk component on the Bi side, a disk component on the C side, and an annulus component. Since Bo lies outside the disk bounded by Bi, it lies either in the annulus component or in the disk component on the C side. In the first case the disk component on the C side lies inside the disk bounded by Bo and outside the disk bounded by Bi, so C bounds a disk in A. In the second case C separates Bi from Bo, and the annulus component between C and Bi lies inside the disk bounded by Bo and outside the disk bounded by Bi. The two disk sides of C then contain Bi and Bo, respectively, so neither is contained in A; hence C is essential exactly in this second case. Thus an essential C has Bi and Bo on opposite disk sides. For two disjoint essential state circles, apply [F5] to the pair. Each disk side containing Bi contains the disk bounded by Bi, while Bo lies on the opposite side of both; therefore the curves are nested and the complementary annulus between them lies outside the disk bounded by Bi and inside the disk bounded by Bo, hence in A. Ordering the finitely many essential circles by disk inclusion shows every consecutive pair bounds such an annular band, so they are parallel. Thus u(S) and e(S) are unambiguous finite counts, and each state contributes a Laurent-polynomial multiple of ze(S).

2.1F1F2step 1.1algebra

The state set is finite. At a chosen crossing, partition it into states using the A-smoothing and states using the B-smoothing. In a framed skein triple the exterior annular strips agree; place the same twist marks on those common arcs and none on the blackboard-framed local crossing or smoothings. Their total correction m is common to all three, so the partition gives Ψ(D×,m)=AΨ(DA,m)+A−1Ψ(DB,m). Adding a zero-framed trivial circle increases u(S) by one in every state, so it multiplies Ψ by δ. Hence the state expansion annihilates both relation generators in [F2].

3.1A2A3F1F3F4step 1.1step 2.1algebra

Annular planar isotopy preserves which state circles bound disks. Under R2 and R3, the local tangle identities in [F4] remain equal after attaching the same exterior annular tangle; evaluating each resulting contractible loop by δ and each essential circle by z is an R-linear operation, so the state expansions agree. For an A-type R1 kink the local state factor is Aδ+A−1=−A3; for the opposite B-type kink it is A+A−1δ=−A−3. By [F3] the correction decreases by one for the A-type kink and increases by one for the B-type kink, so the factor (−A3)m cancels the raw state-sum change. The value is therefore independent of diagram and framing correction.

4.1A3F2F3step 2.1step 3.1algebra∎

By [F3], every framed-link generator has a regular annular diagram and framing correction. Steps 2.1 and 3.1 show that the state expansion is independent of that choice and vanishes on both generators of the defining submodule [F2]. Its R-linear extension therefore factors through the quotient and gives the stated map Ψ.

TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

The Kauffman bracket skein module of S³ is rank one

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice and let R=Z[A±1] and δ=−A2−A−2. The Kauffman bracket skein module KA(S3) is freely generated as an R-module by the empty link. In particular, a zero-framed trivial circle represents δ[∅].

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Countable Choice and the Kauffman bracket skein module of the oriented three-sphere.

[A1]

The Axiom of Countable Choice is the assumption ACω (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

[F1]

The module is generated by framed-link isotopy classes modulo the crossing relation [L×]=A[LA]+A−1[LB] and the zero-framed trivial-circle relation [L⊔O]=δ[L] (Kauffman bracket skein module of a three-manifold).

[F2]

Under ACω, every framed link in S3 has a regular planar diagram, and framed isotopies are represented by finite diagram moves (Framed link diagrams and local Reidemeister moves in plane products).

[F3]

Adding one positive or negative full twist to one component multiplies its skein class by −A3 or −A−3, respectively (Full framing twists in the Kauffman bracket skein module).

[F4]

Framed bracket evaluation is well-defined on KA(S3), is R-linear, and sends [∅] to 1 (Kauffman bracket evaluation of framed links in the three-sphere).

Proof

1.1A1F1F2F3giveninductionalgebra

We prove by induction on the number of crossings of a regular diagram for a blackboard-framed link that its class is a scalar multiple of [∅]. If the diagram has a crossing, the crossing relation in [F1] expresses its class as the sum of the two smoothing classes with coefficients A and A−1. The skein convention gives each smoothing its blackboard framing, and each has one fewer crossing, so the induction applies. A crossingless diagram is a finite disjoint union of planar circles. Choose an innermost circle; its planar disk has no other component in its interior and is disjoint from the remaining link. Its blackboard framing is the zero framing, so [F1] removes it with factor δ. Remove this component and repeat; the crossingless link reduces to a scalar multiple of the empty link. For a general framed link, [F2] supplies a diagram and [F3], applied finitely many times to its framing-correction integer, reduces its class to a scalar multiple of the corresponding blackboard-framed diagram. Hence every class lies in R[∅].

2.1F4step 1.1algebra

Define ϕ:R→KA(S3) by ϕ(r)=r[∅]. Step 1.1 makes ϕ surjective. If ϕ(r)=0, R-linearity and E([∅])=1 give r=E(ϕ(r))=E(0)=0. Thus ϕ is injective as well as surjective, so the empty class is a free R-module generator.

3.1F1algebra∎

The trivial-circle relation in [F1], with L=∅, gives [O]=δ[∅], as claimed.

TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

The solid-torus skein module has a core-multicurve basis

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice and let R=Z[A±1]. Identify the solid torus with A×[−1,1], where A is a planar annulus. A simple closed curve is called essential if it does not bound a disk in A. Every framed link in this product admits a regular annular diagram and an integer framing correction from its blackboard framing. Let z be one blackboard-framed annular core curve, and for n≥1 let zn denote n parallel copies of that curve, with z0 the empty link. In the polynomial ring R[z], z is also the formal variable sent to the core class [z]. Then the classes [zn], n≥0, form an R-basis of KA(A×[−1,1]). Equivalently, the map J:R[z]→KA(A×[−1,1]) sending zn to [zn] is an R-module isomorphism.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Choice, the annulus-product model of the solid torus, and its framed-link skein module.

[A1]

The Axiom of Choice, written AC (The Axiom of Choice).

[A2]

Countable choice, written ACω, means every countable family of nonempty sets has a choice function (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

[A3]

In ZF, AC implies ACω (AC implies DC implies countable choice).

[F1]

The module quotient is generated by framed links and imposes the crossing and zero-framed trivial-circle relations (Kauffman bracket skein module of a three-manifold).

[F2]

Every framed link in A×(−1,1) admits a regular annular diagram, with its framing correction recorded by signed full-twist marks (Framed link diagrams and local Reidemeister moves in plane products).

[F3]

The state expansion Ψ is well-defined on the skein module and sends a diagram with twist correction m to (−A3)m∑SAa(S)−b(S)δu(S)ze(S) (Annular state expansion for the Kauffman bracket skein module).

[F4]

A positive or negative full framing twist on a component multiplies its skein class by −A3 or −A−3, respectively (Full framing twists in the Kauffman bracket skein module).

Proof

1.1A1F3givenconstructalgebra

Define J by the stated R-linear assignment. On zn take the crossingless annular diagram of n parallel essential circles with blackboard framing. It has m=0, a=b=u=0, and e=n, so [F3] gives Ψ(J(zn))=zn. By linearity, Ψ∘J is the identity on R[z], and hence J is injective.

2.1A1A2A3F1F2F3F4step 1.1inductioncasesalgebra∎

Let L be any framed link in the solid torus. By [F2], choose a regular annular diagram D and write mj for the framing correction on its jth component, with m=∑jmj. Apply [F4] componentwise: each positive twist contributes −A3, each negative twist contributes −A−3=(−A3)−1, so [L]=(−A3)m[D], where D carries its blackboard framing. Induct on the number of crossings. At one crossing, [F1] replaces D by its two smoothing diagrams with coefficients A and A−1, and each smoothing has one fewer crossing. Applying the induction hypothesis to each term yields [D]=∑SAa(S)−b(S)[DS], where each DS is a crossingless annular state with blackboard framing. Every embedded state circle in the annulus either bounds a disk or is essential and cuts the annulus into two annuli, so it is isotopic to a core circle. For finitely many disjoint essential circles, cutting along them gives annular regions between consecutive circles; thus they are parallel copies of the core. Among the contractible circles choose one whose disk contains no other state circle; its disk has a small thickening disjoint from the remaining link, so the trivial-circle relation in [F1] removes it with factor δ. Repeating removes all contractible circles. Therefore [L]=(−A3)m∑SAa(S)−b(S)δu(S)[ze(S)]=J(Ψ([L])), where the last equality is [F3]. Thus J∘Ψ is the identity on every link generator, and by R-linearity on the whole quotient. Together with step 1.1 this proves J and Ψ are inverse isomorphisms, so the displayed classes are an R-basis.

LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

Framing transport and compatible collar actions under oriented diffeomorphisms

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. An orientation-preserving diffeomorphism between smooth oriented 3-manifolds transports the full framing of every link and induces an isomorphism of their Kauffman bracket skein modules. If the diffeomorphism carries a specified product collar of a compact oriented boundary surface productwise to another specified collar, the induced isomorphism intertwines the two closed-link collar actions. A positive or negative full framing twist on one link component multiplies its class by −A3 or −A−3, respectively. In KA(S3), a positive twist of a zero-framed trivial circle changes its class from δ[∅] to −A3δ[∅], with δ[∅]≠−A3δ[∅]. In the solid-torus module, a positive twist of the blackboard-framed core changes [z] to −A3[z], with [z]≠−A3[z].

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Choice, oriented smooth three-manifolds, an orientation-preserving diffeomorphism, and matching specified product collars when a boundary action is considered.

[A1]

The Axiom of Choice, written AC (The Axiom of Choice).

[A2]

Countable choice, written ACω, means every countable family of nonempty sets has a choice function (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

[A3]

In ZF, AC implies ACω (AC implies DC implies countable choice).

[F1]

A diffeomorphism induces a skein-module isomorphism by transporting framed links, and a matching product collar carries the closed-link action by gluing and disjoint union; this action is natural under collar-preserving diffeomorphisms (Functoriality and boundary-collar action for the three-manifold skein quotient).

[F2]

A positive or negative full framing twist on one component multiplies its skein class by −A3 or −A−3 (Full framing twists in the Kauffman bracket skein module).

[F3]

The empty class is a free R-basis of KA(S3) and a zero-framed trivial circle has class δ[∅] (The Kauffman bracket skein module of S³ is rank one).

[F4]

The blackboard-framed core classes [zn], n≥0, are an R-basis of the solid-torus module (The solid-torus skein module has a core-multicurve basis).

[F5]

Here R=Z[A±1] is the Laurent-polynomial ring over the integral domain Z (Kauffman bracket smoothing and loop value).

Proof

1.1F1F2givenconstruct

The quotient isomorphism and collar-action naturality are exactly [F1]. Under a diffeomorphism, the framing annulus is carried by the derivative along with its core, so this map preserves the full link framing rather than only the unframed core. A single full twist is changed according to [F2].

1.2A1A2A3F2F3F5algebra

Apply [F2] to the zero-framed trivial circle O in S3. By [F3], [O]=δ[∅], so its positive twist represents −A3δ[∅]. The difference from [O] is (−A3−1)δ[∅]. In R, δ=−(A2+A−2)≠0 and −A3−1≠0; the product is nonzero because the product of two nonzero Laurent polynomials over the integral domain Z is nonzero (its highest-exponent coefficient is the product of their nonzero highest-exponent coefficients). Since [∅] is a basis element by [F3], the two classes are unequal.

2.1A1F2F4F5algebra∎

For the solid-torus core, [F2] gives the twisted class −A3[z]. Its difference from [z] is (−A3−1)[z], which is nonzero because −A3−1≠0 in R and [z] is one of the free basis elements in [F4]. This proves the second displayed framing change is nontrivial.

4 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

None yet.

Sources