Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Smooth and topological knot concordance — Examples and Counterexamples

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Logical flowchart

3 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

None yet.

4 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

A knot and its reverse mirror sum to a slice knot

Example

Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice. For every smooth oriented knot K⊂S3, the connected sum K#K† bounds a smooth disk in B4 with only radial minima and saddles, is therefore also bounded by a locally flat topological disk, and satisfies g4sm(K#K†)=g4top(K#K†)=0. Its reverse-mirror summand represents the inverse of [K] in each concordance group.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: ACω and a smooth oriented knot K⊂S3.

[F1]

The reverse mirror is formed by applying the fixed orientation-reversing reflection and then reversing the knot orientation. (Reverse mirror of an oriented knot)

[F2]

A smooth proper disk is locally flat as a topological proper surface, and its genus is 0 because χ(D2)=1. (Locally flat proper surfaces and concordance collars, Smooth and topological slice genus)

[F3]

The smooth and topological slice genera are the least genera in the respective nonempty surface classes. (Smooth and topological slice genus, Nonemptiness and minima for the smooth and locally flat slice genera)

[F4]

The general reverse-mirror disk construction applies to every smooth oriented knot. (A knot summed with its reverse mirror bounds a ribbon disk)

[F5]

In the smooth concordance group, the reverse-mirror class is the additive inverse; the current theorem's smooth branch proves this using the disk in [F4]. (Smooth and topological knot concordance classes form abelian groups)

[F6]

The full TOP group interface likewise gives the reverse-mirror class as the inverse for locally flat concordance, with the same countable-choice hypothesis. Its TOP connected-sum input includes the compact real-code/L[r] specialization in the compatibility supplier at exactly this standard-product annulus scope; the unqualified literature assertion alone is not treated as an AC_omega theorem. No new local normal-neighborhood proof is asserted here. (Smooth and topological knot concordance classes form abelian groups)

Verification

technique · direct
1.1F1F2F4givenconstruct

By [F1], the notation K† refers to the fixed reverse-mirror operation. Apply [F4] to obtain a smooth disk D bounded by K#K† with radial critical indices 0 or 1. Since the disk is smooth, [F2] makes it an admissible locally flat surface as well. Its Euler characteristic gives g(D)=0.

2.1F2F3step 1.1algebra

Every admissible surface genus is in N0, while D contributes genus 0 to both genus sets. Thus their least elements are 0 by [F3].

3.1F5F6step 1.1∎

By [F5], the class of K† is the inverse of [K] in the smooth group; [F6] gives the same conclusion in the locally flat topological group. The common disk from step1.1 is admissible in both categories, and all input choice hypotheses are ACω. This proves the entire example, including its group-class assertion.

CounterexampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

An abstract annulus need not be a smooth concordance

Statement refuted

Every abstract oriented cobordism between two oriented knot circles in the standard three-sphere can be realized by a smoothly embedded concordance annulus in S3×[0,1].

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The standard unknot U, the standard right-handed trefoil T, and the claim in the Statement refuted.

[F1]

An abstract oriented cobordism is a compact oriented surface with boundary −C0⊔C1 and contains no ambient embedding data. (Abstract oriented cobordism of knot circles)

[F2]

The Seifert matrix convention in the library is Vij=lk⁡(ai+,aj) for a chosen oriented surface and basis; the surface and basis are part of the data until invariance is proved. (Seifert pairing and matrix of an oriented knot)

[F3]

A trefoil Seifert surface admits a rank-two Seifert matrix whose symmetric sum is (−211−2); if the cited convention uses the transpose matrix, the symmetric sum is unchanged. For a real symmetric matrix, its signature is the number of positive eigenvalues minus the number of negative eigenvalues. (Collins, Theorem 2.2.9 and Example 2.2.13, https://era.ed.ac.uk/bitstream/handle/1842/5034/Collins2011.pdf?sequence=4)

[F4]

The standard unknot bounds a disk in S3; the disk is contractible, so its first homology is zero and its symmetrized Seifert form has signature 0. (Oriented connected sum and prime knot)

[F5]

A metabolizer for a rank-two integral Seifert form is a rank-one direct summand L with V(x,y)=0 for x,y∈L. Thus every nonzero x∈L satisfies xT(V+VT)x=2V(x,x)=0. This is immediate from the defining bilinear relation, with no signature-invariance or general signature-vanishing theorem. (Metabolic Seifert forms and algebraic knot concordance)

[F6]

Under the Axiom of Countable Choice, a knot is smoothly slice if and only if it is smoothly concordant to the standard unknot. (Smooth sliceness is equivalent to concordance to the unknot)

[A1]

Full Axiom of Choice is assumed by the supplied Seifert-pairing definition. (The Axiom of Choice)

[A2]

Full Axiom of Choice implies the countable-choice hypothesis used by [F6]. (AC implies DC implies countable choice)

[F7]

Every locally flat slice disk, including every smooth slice disk, induces a metabolizer for the positive-push Seifert form of each specified smooth Seifert surface. The proof uses a locally flat hypersurface and smooth chains only in disjoint smooth ambient neighborhoods; it requires no smoothing of that hypersurface. A slice disk induces a Seifert metabolizer, A locally flat slice surface bounds a Seifert hypersurface

Counterexample

technique · direct finite-form obstruction using the slice-to-metabolizer lemma
1.1F1givenconstruct

Let C0 be the oriented circle underlying U and C1 the oriented circle underlying T. Take the abstract annulus S1×[0,1] and identify its lower and upper boundary circles orientation-preservingly with C0 and C1, orienting the annulus so its boundary is −C0⊔C1. By [F1] this is an abstract oriented cobordism from U to T.

1.2F2F3F4F5A1algebra

For the fixed trefoil matrix in [F3], V+VT=(−211−2). Its characteristic polynomial is λ2+4λ+3=(λ+1)(λ+3), so its eigenvalues are −1,−3 and its signature is −2. More directly, for x=(a,b)≠0 over Q or R, xT(V+VT)x=−2(a2−ab+b2)=−(a−b)2−a2−b2<0. Consequently V cannot have a rank-one metabolizer: a nonzero vector in one would have zero value by [F5]. This is a calculation for the displayed Seifert surface and basis; no knot-level signature invariance is being inferred. The unknot's rank-zero form in [F4] still has signature zero.

2.1A2F3F5F6F7step 1.1step 1.2∎

If U were smoothly concordant to T, reverse the interval coordinate to obtain smooth concordance of T to the unknot. By [F6] and [A2], T would bound a smooth proper disk. Apply [F7] to the particular trefoil Seifert surface in [F3]. It gives a rank-one metabolizer for V, contradicting the strict negative-definiteness calculation and [F5] in step 1.2. Thus the displayed abstract oriented annulus has no realization as a smooth concordance between its specified endpoint knots, refuting the claimed universal realization. The locally flat slice-to-metabolizer lemma applies because every smooth proper disk is locally flat.

Sources