How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Fractional evolution and convolution quadrature — Examples
1 · Prerequisites
- Absolute and Conditional Convergence; Rearrangement; Products
- Absolute Continuity and the Sharp Fundamental Theorem of Calculus
- Analyticity of Holomorphic Functions; Liouville and Morera
- Arc Length and Rectifiable Curves
- Areas of Elementary Plane Figures
- Binary Operations, Monoids, Groups and Subgroups
- Bounded Variation and the Riemann–Stieltjes Integral
- Compactness
- Compactness in Metric Spaces
- Completeness, Completion, and Uniform Continuity
- Complex Coordinate and Path Transport
- Complex Differentiability and the Cauchy–Riemann Equations
- Complex Power Series and Analytic Functions
- Conformal Mapping, Branches, and the Schwarz Lemma
- Connectedness
- Construction of the Natural Numbers
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Cauchy Sequences
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Dedekind Cuts
- Continuity, IVT, EVT, and Uniform Continuity
- Contour Integration
- Convexity
- Cosets, Index and Lagrange's Theorem
- Countability and Uncountability
- Darboux, L'Hôpital, and Taylor's Theorem
- Density Separability and Convolution in Lᵖ
- Determinants of Matrices over a Commutative Ring
- Differentiation of Monotone Functions and the Vitali Covering Theorem
- Divisibility, Euclidean Domains, Principal Ideal Domains and Unique Factorisation
- Filters and Ultrafilters
- Finite Counting, Factorials and Binomial Coefficients
- Foundations of the Real Numbers for Analysis
- Fractional evolution and convolution quadrature
- Fubini and Change of Variables
- Fundamental Trigonometric Identities
- Gaussian Elimination, Elementary Matrices and Reduced Row Echelon Form
- Goursat's Theorem and Cauchy's Theorem in a Convex Domain
- Group Actions, Orbits, Stabilisers and Cayley's Theorem
- Ideals, Quotient Rings and the Isomorphism Theorems for Rings
- Improper and Parameter-Dependent Multiple Integrals
- Improper Integrals
- Lebesgue Measure on Euclidean Space
- Limits of Real Functions
- limsup, liminf, and Subsequential Limits
- Line Integrals and the Gradient Theorem
- Linear Independence, Bases and Dimension
- Linear Transformations, Rank-Nullity and Quotient Spaces
- Matrices, the Matrix of a Linear Map, and Change of Basis
- Measurable Functions and Simple Approximation
- Measures and Their Basic Properties
- Metric Spaces
- Mixed Partials, Taylor Formulae, and Extrema
- Monotone Functions, Discontinuities, and Continuity Sets
- Monotone Sequences, Bolzano-Weierstrass, and Cauchy Completeness
- Normal Subgroups and Quotient Groups
- Order, Zorn's Lemma, and the Axiom of Choice
- Outer Measure and the Caratheodory Extension Theorem
- Partitions of Unity and Paracompactness
- pi: the Equivalent Characterizations
- Pointwise Extended-Real Function Products
- Polynomial Rings, the Division Algorithm and Roots
- Power Series and Real-Analytic Functions
- Product Measures and the Fubini Tonelli Theorems
- Properties of the Integral and the Working FTC
- Relations, Functions, and Quotients
- Rings, Subrings, Integral Domains and Fields
- Rⁿ as a Normed Space; Vector-Valued Functions
- Roots, Rational Powers, and Classical Inequalities
- Separation Axioms: the Hierarchy
- Sequences and Limits
- Sequences and Series of Functions; Uniform Convergence
- Series: Convergence and the Nonnegative Tests
- Sigma Algebras and Borel Sets
- Signed and Complex Measures Hahn and Jordan
- Simple Field Extensions and the Construction of the Complex Numbers
- Sine, Cosine, and the Definition of Pi
- Subspaces, Products, and Quotients
- Suprema and Infima
- Symmetric Groups, Cycle Decomposition and the Sign Homomorphism
- The Cantor Set, Baire Category, and Measure Zero in ℝ
- The Complex Exponential and Euler's Formula
- The Derivative and the Mean Value Theorems
- The Exponential Function
- The Fundamental Theorems of Calculus
- The Identity Theorem, the Maximum Principle and the Open Mapping Theorem
- The Inverse and Implicit Function Theorems
- The Lebesgue and Riemann Integrals Compared
- The Lebesgue Integral and the Convergence Theorems
- The Logarithm and General Powers
- The Lᵖ Spaces Holder Minkowski and Riesz Fischer
- The Maximal Function and Lebesgue Differentiation
- The Radon Nikodym Theorem and Lebesgue Decomposition
- The Real Gamma and Beta Functions
- The Riemann Integral in Rᵐ and Jordan Content
- The Riemann Integral: Definition and Integrability
- The Topology of Euclidean Space
- The Total Derivative in ℝᵐ → ℝⁿ
- The Winding Number and the Global Cauchy Theorem
- The ZFC Axioms and the Basic Set Constructions
- Topological Spaces and Continuity
- Topology of ℝ
- Triangularisation, Generalised Eigenspaces and Jordan Canonical Form
- Vector Spaces, Linear Subspaces, Span and Direct Sums
2 · Summary
Objective
These examples compute first steps for scalar fractional relaxation, expose the initial singularity in , instantiate the graded-grid formula, and compare full-history work with an exactly computed truncated-memory bias. They make no optimal graded-mesh or accelerated-convolution claim.
3 · Logical flowchart
4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs
None yet.
5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements
First steps for a scalar fractional relaxation
Example
Consider the scalar fractional relaxation equation with . On a uniform first step of width , the L1 method returns
while backward-Euler convolution quadrature returns
These are the methods' first-step outputs; this calculation makes no claim about their later-step values or a long-time limit.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: , , , , and .
Uniform-grid and graded-grid L1 discretization: on the first uniform step, ; the returned sequence satisfies the discrete equation by Positive L1 weights, discrete comparison, and residual stability.
Backward-Euler convolution quadrature for a Caputo equation: with , and ; the algorithm's returned sequence satisfies its shifted discrete equation by Scalar resolvent stability for backward-Euler convolution quadrature.
Verification
For , the first-step discrete equation is by [F1]. Multiplying by and solving gives .
For CQ, [F2] gives , so and . Both values are positive and less than because and .
Full-history cost and the bias from truncating memory
Example
On a uniform grid with steps, direct L1 evaluation uses exactly history-weight terms and stores the nodal values. If only the most recent increments are retained, then for and the truncated L1 Caputo value is
whereas the full value is . The lost history therefore contributes the exact bias
The truncated implementation uses terms and at most recent nodal values. No error guarantee for other trajectories is claimed.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: , , an integer , , and an integer .
Absolute continuity on a compact interval: absolute continuity means that for every some makes the sum of absolute endpoint increments smaller than for any finite disjoint interval family of total length below .
Fractional integral and Caputo derivative: almost everywhere; at points where this integral is finite, its pointwise integral value is the representative used below.
Uniform-grid and graded-grid L1 discretization: uniform-grid weights are and each L1 step sums all retained increments with these weights.
Finite sums and finite products, by recursion: the displayed finite sums add their indexed terms.
Finite commutative-monoid sums are invariant under bijective reindexing, split over disjoint unions, and satisfy the finite Fubini rule: reindexing a finite sum by a bijection of its finite index set preserves its value.
Verification
Fix any . For any finite disjoint intervals, the sum of absolute endpoint increments of equals the sum of their lengths. Thus [F1]'s defining condition holds with , and is absolutely continuous.
By [F5], on , so . Using the pointwise representative from [F2], the kernel integral [F6] gives using [F4]. This integral is finite at each .
The direct full-history step uses one term for each increment . Let . Reindexing by using [F8] also gives . Adding these equalities termwise gives by [F7], so the full-history term count is . Retaining the sequence requires nodal values.
For , the truncated version of [F3] retains exactly the terms with index lag . Since , where the sum telescopes. The full sum through likewise telescopes to and equals the exact derivative from step 1.2. This gives the bias stated.
At step the truncated evaluation uses terms, so [F7] gives its total count as . It can retain only the most recent increments, equivalently adjacent nodal values. For no term is omitted, and at the bias is zero at every step.
A Caputo startup singularity and a graded-grid calculation
Example
Let , , and . Then is absolutely continuous and for , but . With and forcing , the uniform-grid first L1 step has state error
so it is not . For the power-graded mesh with , the nodes are ; the first-step state error is . This first-node calculation does not prove an optimal global graded-mesh rate.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Countable Choice, , , , , , , and an integer .
Countable Choice: every sequence of nonempty sets admits a choice function (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()). It is used only through [F10] and [F13].
Absolute continuity on a compact interval: is absolutely continuous when the sum of its absolute endpoint increments over any finite family of intervals with pairwise disjoint interiors is small whenever their total length is small.
Fractional integral and Caputo derivative: for continuous , is finite for every ; for with , almost everywhere, and at points where this integral is finite its pointwise integral value is the representative used below.
The real Gamma functional equation : and for .
Uniform-grid and graded-grid L1 discretization: the first-step L1 weight on a uniform or general grid is .
L1 stability and the smooth-data error bound: the uniform-grid estimate assumes .
Integral of the fractional power kernel and Change of variable in an improper integral: for , by reflection from the displayed kernel integral.
Absolutely continuous functions have integrable derivatives: if is absolutely continuous, then .
Monotonicity and nonnegative homogeneity of the nonnegative integral: pointwise domination of nonnegative measurable functions preserves the integral inequality and finiteness.
Additivity of the nonnegative Lebesgue integral: the nonnegative integral is additive over a finite measurable partition.
A C^1 diffeomorphism satisfies the change-of-variables formula for L^1 functions: under [A1], if is a diffeomorphism and , then .
The mean value theorem, as the case of Cauchy's: for continuous on with and differentiable on there is with : for a continuous function on a closed interval differentiable on its interior, some interior derivative equals the secant slope.
Positive L1 weights, discrete comparison, and residual stability: the returned L1 sequence satisfies its discrete equation at each grid node.
Verification
Fix an arbitrary and set and . By [F14] and for , is increasing. Reorder any finite family of intervals with pairwise disjoint interiors by left endpoints; since is increasing, absolute endpoint increments equal endpoint increments, and monotonicity across the gaps shows their sum on a subinterval is at most . For , and by [F9]. If , the family contributes at most . If , split each interval at . The pieces below contribute at most . On pieces above , , so [F14] bounds their total increments by . Thus [F1]'s defining condition holds. But is unbounded as , so .
Fix . By step 1.1 and [A1], [F10] gives . On , ; on , . The fractional-integral clause of [F2] makes integrable on ; [F11] bounds the product on each half, and [F12] adds the two finite integrals. Hence for every .
For the pointwise representative in [F2], apply [F13] to the integrable kernel in step 2.1 with . This is a diffeomorphism with , and the Jacobian cancels the factor in . Therefore using the Beta–Gamma identity [F4] and plus the functional equation [F5]. This holds for every .
For the uniform grid, [F6] and [F15] give the equation , hence . Also because with strict inequality except at , and [F3]–[F5] evaluate the last integrals. Hence the stated error is positive. Its ratio to is , which is unbounded as ; the smooth-data theorem [F7] cannot be extended to this example.
On the power-graded grid, , so [F6] gives . The first discrete equation, justified by [F15], yields , and subtracting it from gives the displayed graded first-step error. For the nodes follow by substituting into .
Sources
- Yumin Lin and Chuanju Xu, Finite difference/spectral approximations for the time-fractional diffusion equation, Journal of Computational Physics 225 (2007), §3
- Ralf Hiptmair, Advanced Numerical Methods for Computational Science and Engineering, lecture notes (2023), §3.3.2
- Bangti Jin, Raytcho Lazarov, and Zhi Zhou, An Analysis of the L1 Scheme for the Subdiffusion Equation with Nonsmooth Data, IMA Journal of Numerical Analysis, §§1–3
- Martin Stynes, Eugene O'Riordan, and José Luis Gracia, Error Analysis of a Finite Difference Method on Graded Meshes for a Time-Fractional Diffusion Equation, SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis 55 (2017), §§1, 3–5