Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

✓ 3 results · all verified · 1 also independently AI-judged
Every result on this page is machine-checked by a proof checker and read in full and owner-audited; the judge is an additional, independent cross-model AI review of the proofs. The 2 not AI-judged were verified by owner audit (typically over a confirmed judge false positive), not failures.

Fractional evolution and convolution quadrature — Examples

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

Objective

These examples compute first steps for scalar fractional relaxation, expose the initial singularity in u(t)=t1/2, instantiate the graded-grid formula, and compare full-history work with an exactly computed truncated-memory bias. They make no optimal graded-mesh or accelerated-convolution claim.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

None yet.

5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)Open item page →

First steps for a scalar fractional relaxation

Example

Consider the scalar fractional relaxation equation DC1/2u(t)+u(t)=0 with u(0)=1. On a uniform first step of width h>0, the L1 method returns

UL11=11+Γ(3/2)h,

while backward-Euler convolution quadrature returns

UCQ1=11+h.

These are the methods' first-step outputs; this calculation makes no claim about their later-step values or a long-time limit.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: 0<α=1/2<1, λ=1, u0=1, F1=0, and h>0.

[F1]

Uniform-grid and graded-grid L1 discretization: on the first uniform step, δhαU1=h−α(U1−U0)/Γ(2−α); the returned sequence satisfies the discrete equation by Positive L1 weights, discrete comparison, and residual stability.

[F2]

Backward-Euler convolution quadrature for a Caputo equation: with V0=0, (h−α+λ)V1=F1−λu0 and U1=u0+V1; the algorithm's returned sequence satisfies its shifted discrete equation by Scalar resolvent stability for backward-Euler convolution quadrature.

[F3]

Verification

technique · direct
1.1givenF1algebra

For α=1/2, the first-step discrete equation is h−1/2(U1−1)/Γ(3/2)+U1=0 by [F1]. Multiplying by Γ(3/2)h and solving gives U1=(1+Γ(3/2)h)−1.

2.1givenF2F3algebra∎

For CQ, [F2] gives (h−1/2+1)V1=−1, so V1=−h/(1+h) and U1=1+V1=(1+h)−1. Both values are positive and less than 1 because h>0 and Γ(3/2)>0.

ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passOpen item page →

Full-history cost and the bias from truncating memory

Example

On a uniform grid with N steps, direct L1 evaluation uses exactly N(N+1)/2 history-weight terms and stores the N+1 nodal values. If only the most recent m increments are retained, then for u(t)=t and n>m the truncated L1 Caputo value is

δ~hαun=(mh)1−αΓ(2−α),

whereas the full value is tn1−α/Γ(2−α). The lost history therefore contributes the exact bias

tn1−α−(mh)1−αΓ(2−α).

The truncated implementation uses ∑n=1Nmin⁡(n,m) terms and at most m+1 recent nodal values. No error guarantee for other trajectories is claimed.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: 0<α<1, T>0, an integer N≥1, h=T/N, and an integer 1≤m≤N.

[F1]

Absolute continuity on a compact interval: absolute continuity means that for every ε>0 some δ>0 makes the sum of absolute endpoint increments smaller than ε for any finite disjoint interval family of total length below δ.

[F2]

Fractional integral and Caputo derivative: DCαu=Γ(1−α)−1∫0t(t−s)−αu′(s)ds almost everywhere; at points where this integral is finite, its pointwise integral value is the representative used below.

[F3]

Uniform-grid and graded-grid L1 discretization: uniform-grid weights are aj=(j+1)1−α−j1−α and each L1 step sums all retained increments with these weights.

[F4]

The real Gamma functional equation Γ(s+1)=sΓ(s): Γ(2−α)=(1−α)Γ(1−α).

[F6]

Integral of the fractional power kernel: ∫0t(t−s)−αds=t1−α/(1−α).

[F7]

Finite sums and finite products, by recursion: the displayed finite sums add their indexed terms.

Verification

technique · direct
1.1givenF1algebra

Fix any ε>0. For any finite disjoint intervals, the sum of absolute endpoint increments of u(t)=t equals the sum of their lengths. Thus [F1]'s defining condition holds with δ=ε, and u is absolutely continuous.

1.2givenF2F4F5F6algebra

By [F5], u′=1 on (0,T), so u′∈L1(0,T). Using the pointwise representative from [F2], the kernel integral [F6] gives DCαu(t)=1Γ(1−α)∫0t(t−s)−αds=t1−α(1−α)Γ(1−α)=t1−αΓ(2−α), using [F4]. This integral is finite at each t∈[0,T].

1.3givenF7F8algebra

The direct full-history step n uses one term for each increment k=1,…,n. Let S=∑n=1Nn. Reindexing by n↦N+1−n using [F8] also gives S=∑n=1N(N+1−n). Adding these equalities termwise gives 2S=∑n=1N(N+1)=N(N+1) by [F7], so the full-history term count is N(N+1)/2. Retaining the sequence requires N+1 nodal values.

2.1step 1.2F3algebra

For n>m, the truncated version of [F3] retains exactly the m terms with index lag j=0,…,m−1. Since uk−uk−1=h, δ~hαun=h1−αΓ(2−α)∑j=0m−1aj=h1−αm1−αΓ(2−α), where the sum telescopes. The full sum through j=n−1 likewise telescopes to n1−α and equals the exact derivative from step 1.2. This gives the bias stated.

3.1givenstep 2.1F7algebra∎

At step n the truncated evaluation uses min⁡(n,m) terms, so [F7] gives its total count as ∑n=1Nmin⁡(n,m). It can retain only the m most recent increments, equivalently m+1 adjacent nodal values. For n≤m no term is omitted, and at m=N the bias is zero at every step.

ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passOpen item page →

A Caputo startup singularity and a graded-grid calculation

Example

Let u(t)=t, 0≤t≤T, and α=1/2. Then u is absolutely continuous and DC1/2u(t)=Γ(3/2) for t>0, but u∉C2([0,T]). With λ=0 and forcing f(t)=Γ(3/2), the uniform-grid first L1 step has state error

u(h)−U1=(1−Γ(3/2)2)h>0,

so it is not O(h3/2). For the power-graded mesh tk=T(k/N)2 with N=4, the nodes are 0,T/16,T/4,9T/16,T; the first-step state error is (1−Γ(3/2)2)T/N. This first-node calculation does not prove an optimal global graded-mesh rate.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice, T>0, u(t)=t1/2, α=1/2, λ=0, u0=0, f(t)=Γ(3/2), and an integer N≥1.

[A1]

Countable Choice: every sequence of nonempty sets admits a choice function (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)). It is used only through [F10] and [F13].

[F1]

Absolute continuity on a compact interval: u is absolutely continuous when the sum of its absolute endpoint increments over any finite family of intervals with pairwise disjoint interiors is small whenever their total length is small.

[F2]

Fractional integral and Caputo derivative: for continuous g, Iβg(t)=Γ(β)−1∫0t(t−s)β−1g(s) ds is finite for every t; for u∈AC with u′∈L1, DCαu=Γ(1−α)−1∫0t(t−s)−αu′(s)ds almost everywhere, and at points where this integral is finite its pointwise integral value is the representative used below.

[F3]

The real Gamma function by Euler's integral: Γ(q)=∫0∞sq−1e−sds for q>0.

[F4]

Euler's real Beta integral and The real Beta--Gamma identity: B(p,q)=Γ(p)Γ(q)/Γ(p+q) for p,q>0.

[F5]

The real Gamma functional equation Γ(s+1)=sΓ(s): Γ(q+1)=qΓ(q) and Γ(1)=1 for q>0.

[F6]

Uniform-grid and graded-grid L1 discretization: the first-step L1 weight on a uniform or general grid is b1,1=t1−α/Γ(2−α).

[F7]

L1 stability and the smooth-data error bound: the O(h2−α) uniform-grid estimate assumes u∈C2([0,T]).

[F9]

Integral of the fractional power kernel and Change of variable in an improper integral: ∫0ts−1/2ds=2t for t>0, by reflection from the displayed kernel integral.

[F10]

Absolutely continuous functions have integrable derivatives: if u is absolutely continuous, then u′∈L1(0,T).

[F11]

Monotonicity and nonnegative homogeneity of the nonnegative integral: pointwise domination of nonnegative measurable functions preserves the integral inequality and finiteness.

[F12]

Additivity of the nonnegative Lebesgue integral: the nonnegative integral is additive over a finite measurable partition.

[F13]

A C^1 diffeomorphism satisfies the change-of-variables formula for L^1 functions: under [A1], if S:(0,1)→(0,t) is a C1 diffeomorphism and g∈L1(0,t), then ∫0tg(s) ds=∫01g(S(y))∣S′(y)∣ dy.

[F15]

Positive L1 weights, discrete comparison, and residual stability: the returned L1 sequence satisfies its discrete equation at each grid node.

Verification

technique · direct
1.1givenF1F8F9F14algebra

Fix an arbitrary ε>0 and set η=min⁡(T,ε2/16) and δ=ε2/8. By [F14] and u′(s)>0 for s>0, u is increasing. Reorder any finite family of intervals with pairwise disjoint interiors by left endpoints; since u is increasing, absolute endpoint increments equal endpoint increments, and monotonicity across the gaps shows their sum on a subinterval [a,b] is at most u(b)−u(a). For t>0, u′(t)=1/(2t) and u(t)=∫0t(2s)−1ds by [F9]. If T≤ε2/16, the family contributes at most u(T)−u(0)=T≤ε/4<ε. If T>ε2/16, split each interval at η=ε2/16. The pieces below η contribute at most u(η)−u(0)=η=ε/4. On pieces above η, u′(s)≤1/(2η)=2/ε, so [F14] bounds their total increments by (2/ε)δ=ε/4. Thus [F1]'s defining condition holds. But u′′(t)=−1/(4t3/2) is unbounded as t↓0, so u∉C2([0,T]).

2.1givenA1F2F10F11F12F8step 1.1

Fix t>0. By step 1.1 and [A1], [F10] gives u′∈L1(0,T). On (0,t/2), (t−s)−1/2≤(t/2)−1/2; on (t/2,t), u′(s)≤1/(2t/2). The fractional-integral clause of [F2] makes (t−s)−1/2 integrable on (0,t); [F11] bounds the product on each half, and [F12] adds the two finite integrals. Hence (t−s)−1/2u′(s)∈L1(0,t) for every t>0.

3.1givenA1F2F4F5F13step 2.1algebra

For the pointwise representative in [F2], apply [F13] to the integrable kernel in step 2.1 with S(y)=ty. This is a C1 diffeomorphism with S′(y)=t, and the Jacobian cancels the factor t−1 in (ty)−1/2(t−ty)−1/2. Therefore DC1/2u(t)=12Γ(1/2)∫01(1−y)−1/2y−1/2 dy=B(1/2,1/2)2Γ(1/2)=12Γ(1/2)=Γ(3/2), using the Beta–Gamma identity [F4] and Γ(1)=1 plus the functional equation [F5]. This holds for every t>0.

4.1givenF3F4F5F6F7F15step 3.1algebra

For the uniform grid, [F6] and [F15] give the equation δh1/2U1=f(h), hence U1=Γ(3/2)2h. Also Γ(3/2)=∫0∞s e−sds<12∫0∞(s+1)e−sds=1, because (s−1)2≥0 with strict inequality except at s=1, and [F3]–[F5] evaluate the last integrals. Hence the stated error is positive. Its ratio to h3/2 is (1−Γ(3/2)2)/h, which is unbounded as h↓0; the smooth-data theorem [F7] cannot be extended to this example.

5.1givenF6F15algebra∎

On the power-graded grid, t1=T/N2, so [F6] gives b1,1=N/(Γ(3/2)T). The first discrete equation, justified by [F15], yields U1=Γ(3/2)2T/N, and subtracting it from u(t1)=T/N gives the displayed graded first-step error. For N=4 the nodes follow by substituting k=0,1,2,3,4 into tk=T(k/4)2.

Sources