Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Charged test-scalar scattering and superradiant flux — Examples

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, postulates, theorems and proofs

None yet.

5 · Examples, experiments and counterexamples

CounterexampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

A charged RN background does not amplify a neutral test scalar

Statement refuted

Every admitted scattering mode on a nonzero charged subextremal electric Reissner--Nordström background is amplified, regardless of the test scalar's charge.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The charged radial scattering model on a fixed subextremal electric RN exterior. We construct an admitted solution for the neutral spherical mode; no scattering-solution existence is assumed.

[F1]

Charged radial equation on subextremal electric RN: for a smooth separated solution, u′′+[(ω−eQ/r)2−f(ℓ(ℓ+1)/r2+f′/r)]u=0, with derivatives in r∗.

[F2]

Exact charged scattering Wronskian flux identity: every admitted scattering solution satisfies ∣R∣2=1−(ω−eQ/r+)∣T∣2/ω.

[F3]

Massless charged-scalar radial scattering data: x=r∗ is a smooth coordinate from the exterior onto R with dr/dx=f; the separated field is Aine−iωtYu/r. For e=0, Θ=ωx and ωH=ω, and admissibility requires u=e−iωx+Reiωx+o(1),u′=−iωe−iωx+iωReiωx+o(1)(x→+∞), u=Te−iωx+o(1),u′=−iωTe−iωx+o(1)(x→−∞).

[A1]

Choose any M>0, 0<∣Q∣<M, and ω>0, and set e=0 and ℓ=0.

[A2]

For the ℓ=0 angular mode choose Y(Ω)=(4π)−1/2 on the unit round sphere. It is smooth, satisfies ΔγS2Y=0. Since dωS2=sin⁡θ dθ dϕ, ∫S2Y2 dωS2=(4π)−1∫02π ⁣∫0πsin⁡θ dθ dϕ=1.

Counterexample

1.1givenF1A1A2algebra

Write x=r∗ and use the choices in [A1]--[A2]. By [F3], x ranges over all of R and dr/dx=f. The charged radial equation [F1] becomes u′′(x)+(ω2−V(x))u(x)=0,V(x):=f(r(x))f′(r(x))r(x). The definition gives dr/dx=f and f(r)=(r−r+)(r−r−)/r2. Since r+>M>r− and r+r−=Q2, we have f(r)>0 and Mr>Mr+>Q2 for r>r+, so f′(r)=2(Mr−Q2)/r3>0 and V>0. Thus V is smooth and real. Moreover, ∫R∣V(x)∣ dx=∫r+∞f′(r)r dr=∫r+∞2(Mr−Q2)r4 dr<∞.

2.1givenstep 1.1algebraconstruct

Define u− by the Volterra equation u−(x)=e−iωx+1ω∫−∞xsin⁡ ⁣(ω(x−y))V(y)u−(y) dy. Iteration gives a uniformly convergent Neumann series: the absolute value of its nth iterated term is at most ∥V∥L1(R)n/(ωnn!), using ∣sin⁡z∣≤1 for real z and the ordered integration region. The sum is bounded on R; differentiating the integral equation shows it is a smooth solution of the equation in step 1.1. The tail integrals tend to zero as x→−∞, and differentiation under the integral gives u−(x)=e−iωx+o(1),u−′(x)=−iωe−iωx+o(1)(x→−∞).

3.1givenstep 2.1algebra

Since Vu−∈L1(R), expanding the sine in step 2.1 into exponentials and replacing the upper integration limit by +∞ gives u−(x)=ae−iωx+beiωx+o(1),u−′(x)=−iωae−iωx+iωbeiωx+o(1) as x→+∞, where a=1−12iω∫ReiωyV(y)u−(y) dy,b=12iω∫Re−iωyV(y)u−(y) dy. The same tail estimate after differentiating the integral equation proves the displayed derivative asymptotic.

4.1givenF1F3step 1.1step 2.1step 3.1algebra

For j=Im⁡(u−‾u−′), the real-coefficient equation in step 1.1 gives j′=0. The horizon asymptotics in step 2.1 yield j=−ω, while step 3.1 yields j=ω(∣b∣2−∣a∣2) at infinity; the two oscillatory cross terms have real sum and contribute no imaginary part. Hence ∣a∣2=∣b∣2+1, so a≠0. Put u=u−/a, R=b/a, and T=1/a. Then u has the asymptotics in [F3], with unit incoming amplitude and only the ingoing branch at the horizon. The separated-wave substitution in the proof of [F1] is reversible here: Y is a nonzero constant, Ain and fr are nonzero, and each displayed step is an equality. Therefore ψ=Aine−iωtYu/r solves □g,Aψ=0 and is an admitted scattering solution for any fixed nonzero allowed Ain.

5.1givenF2A1step 4.1algebra∎

Apply [F2] to this constructed solution. Since e=0 and T=1/a≠0, ∣R∣2=1−∣T∣2=1−∣a∣−2<1. Thus this nonzero-charge background admits a neutral mode whose reflected radial flux is less than the incident flux, contradicting the universal amplification statement.

Remarks

The construction proves existence for the neutral ℓ=0 mode under the stated subextremal real-frequency assumptions. It does not assert existence for every charged mode or for other boundary-value problems.

Sources