Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Cm Math Canonical — Examples

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

The companion page to cm-math-canonical records explicit worked checks for its canonical-calculus and Hamilton-Jacobi results. Everything here is mathematics: the examples carry domain: mathematics, depend only on the mathematical items of the parent page and on mathematical suppliers, and make no physical or empirical claim.

The free particle: the complete integral S=qα−tα2/(2m), its characteristics and its canonical labels checks the free particle Hamiltonian H=p2/(2m): the family S=qα−tα2/(2m) solves the Hamilton-Jacobi equation, has Sqα=1, produces the characteristics q(t)=β+tα/m with momentum p=α, and satisfies dq∧dp=dβ∧dα. The linear shear: the second-kind generating function S(q,P)=qP+λq2/2 and the matrix test takes the second-kind S(q,P)=qP+λq2/2, generates the shear (q,p)↦(q,p−λq), and verifies the matrix test DΨTJ DΨ=J by direct multiplication. The unit cylinder shift: explicit local generating function, loop integral and global failure specialises the cylinder-shift proposition to a=1: it records the loop integral 1 that makes dθC non-exact, the generating function S=θP−θ on a chart, and the global failure of any single-valued generating function. The isotropic oscillator: the explicit flow, YTJY=J and det⁡Y=1 computes the flow of XH for H=(p2+q2)/2, differentiates it to verify Y′=J Hess H Y, and checks YTJY=J and det⁡Y=1 explicitly.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, postulates, theorems and proofs

None yet.

5 · Examples, experiments and counterexamples

ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passOpen item page →

The free particle: the complete integral S=qα−tα2/(2m), its characteristics and its canonical labels

Example

Let m>0 and let H:R×R×R→R, H(t,q,p):=p2/(2m), be the free-particle Hamiltonian (The Hamiltonian field of a C2 function on a phase domain is J∇H, and the Poisson bracket is ∑i(∂qif ∂pig−∂pif ∂qig)), and let S:R×R×R→R, S(t,q,α):=qα−tα2/(2m). Then:

  1. S solves the Hamilton-Jacobi equation St+H(t,q,Sq)=0 on R3 and is a complete integral at every point, with Sqα=1 (The Hamilton-Jacobi equation and a complete integral of it);
  2. the Jacobi constants are β:=Sα=q−tα/m, so the characteristics are q(t)=β+tα/m with momentum p=α; these satisfy q′=p/m, p′=0, and β is constant along them (A complete integral produces Hamilton characteristics, the Jacobi constants, a local converse and canonical (β,α) labels);
  3. on R3 at fixed t one has dq∧dp=dβ∧dα: the pair (β,α) is canonically conjugate to (q,p).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The mass m>0, the free-particle Hamiltonian H=p2/(2m) and the function S=qα−tα2/(2m) on R3.

[F1]

Partial derivatives (Directional derivatives and partial derivatives of a map U⊆Rm→Rn): St=−α2/(2m), Sq=α, Sα=q−tα/m, Sqα=1.

[F2]

Complete integral and characteristics (The Hamilton-Jacobi equation and a complete integral of it, A complete integral produces Hamilton characteristics, the Jacobi constants, a local converse and canonical (β,α) labels): a C3 function with St+H(t,q,Sq)=0 and det⁡Sqα≠0 is a complete integral, and the characteristic equations q′=Hp(t,q,Sq), p=Sq then satisfy Hamilton's equations, with Sα constant.

[F3]

Two-form calculus (A phase domain, its canonical one-form and its standard symplectic two-form, The pullback of a differential form, The wedge product of differential forms): on a phase domain with coordinates (q,p) the standard form is dq∧dp, and dβ∧dα is computed from the differentials dq,dα by bilinearity and alternation.

Verification

technique · direct; compute the derivatives, check the Hamilton-Jacobi equation and the characteristics, then compare the two two-forms
1.1F1F2algebra

By [F1], St+H(t,q,Sq)=−α2/(2m)+α2/(2m)=0 on R3; since Sqα=1≠0, S is a complete integral at every point by [F2], proving clause 1.

1.2F1F2algebra

Clause 2: by [F1], β=Sα=q−tα/m, so for fixed α and β the characteristic curve is q(t)=β+tα/m with p(t)=Sq=α; then q′=α/m=Hp(t,q,p) and p′=0=−Hq, and β is constant along the curve by construction.

2.1F3step 1.2algebra∎

Clause 3: at fixed t, dβ=dq−(t/m)dα and dp=dα; hence dβ∧dα=(dq−(t/m)dα)∧dα=dq∧dα=dq∧dp, since dα∧dα=0.

ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passOpen item page →

The linear shear: the second-kind generating function S(q,P)=qP+λq2/2 and the matrix test

Example

Let n=1, let λ∈R, and let S:R2→R, S(q,P):=qP+λq2/2. Then:

  1. S is a generating function of the second kind with SqP=1≠0, and the local map it generates is Ψλ(q,p)=(Q,P)=(q, p−λq), defined on all of R2 (Generating functions of the first and second kind for a local canonical map);
  2. Ψλ is canonical, both by the generating-function theorem (The local map generated by a first- or second-kind generating function is a canonical C2 local diffeomorphism) and by direct verification of the matrix identity DΨλTJ DΨλ=J (A C1 map between phase domains preserves the standard two-form iff DCTJ DC=J, and a canonical diffeomorphism carries XH∘C to XH).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The real number λ and the function S(q,P)=qP+λq2/2.

[F1]

Derivatives (Directional derivatives and partial derivatives of a map U⊆Rm→Rn): Sq=P+λq and SP=q, so SqP=1 and the second-kind relations p=Sq, Q=SP read p=P+λq, Q=q; solving, P=p−λq and Q=q, so the generated map is Ψλ(q,p)=(q,p−λq) on all of R2, a C∞ diffeomorphism (Generating functions of the first and second kind for a local canonical map, Ck Euclidean maps and diffeomorphisms).

Verification

technique · direct; read off the generated map from the defining relations and multiply the two-by-two matrices
1.1F1algebra

Clause 1 is [F1]: SqP=1≠0, and the relations p=Sq=P+λq, Q=SP=q give Ψλ(q,p)=(q,p−λq), which is a linear isomorphism of R2 and therefore a C∞ diffeomorphism.

2.1F1F2step 1.1algebra∎

Clause 2: the derivative is DΨλ=(10−λ1), and (1−λ01)(01−10)(10−λ1)=(01−10)=J by direct block multiplication; hence Ψλ is canonical by [F2], while the generating-function theorem gives the same conclusion because dS=p dq+Q dP and d2S=0 force dq∧dp=dQ∧dP.

ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passOpen item page →

The unit cylinder shift: explicit local generating function, loop integral and global failure

Example

Take the cylinder C=(R/Z)×R with the shift Φ(θ,I)=(θ,I+1), i.e. a=1 in The symplectic shift of the cylinder changes λ by the closed, non-exact form a dθ and has no global generating function, and with the descended forms λC,ωC of that proposition. Then:

  1. Φ∗λC=λC+dθC and Φ∗ωC=ωC;
  2. the loop γ(t)=π(t,0), t∈[0,1], satisfies ∫01dθC(γ′(t)) dt=1≠0, confirming that dθC is not exact on C;
  3. on the chart {θ∈(0,1)} the second-kind generating function S(θ,P)=θP−θ generates the shift; globally no such C1 function exists.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The cylinder C, the shift Φ, the descended forms and the loop γ.

[F1]

The proposition The symplectic shift of the cylinder changes λ by the closed, non-exact form a dθ and has no global generating function establishes clauses 1 and 2 in general form for a≠0; for a=1 the identities read Φ∗λC−λC=dθC and ∫01dθC(γ′(t)) dt=1. [F1]

[F2]

The second-kind relations and the local chart (Generating functions of the first and second kind for a local canonical map): for θ in an open interval of length one, S(θ,P)=θP−θ satisfies Sθ=P−1, SP=θ and SθP=1, so it generates the map that sends (θ,I) with I=P−1 to (Q,P)=(θ,I+1); on the chart S is a C∞ function.

Verification

technique · direct; specialise the general identities to $a=1$, compute the loop integral, and check the generating relations on a chart
1.1F1

Clause 1 is [F1] specialised to a=1: Φ∗λC=λC+dθC and Φ∗ωC=ωC; clause 2 is the same proposition's non-exactness statement, whose proof integrates dθC along γ to 1.

2.1F1F2algebra∎

Clause 3: on the chart θ∈(0,1) the derivatives of [F2] satisfy the second-kind relations p=Sθ=P−1 and Q=SP=θ with SθP=1≠0; the generated map is (θ,I)↦(θ,I+1), which is the shift, so S generates Φ on the chart. Globally, The symplectic shift of the cylinder changes λ by the closed, non-exact form a dθ and has no global generating function clause 3 (with a=1) excludes any global C1 generating function: a 1-periodic lift S^ would satisfy S^P=θ+m for a constant integer m and S^θ=P−1, hence S^(θ,P)=θP+mP+c(θ) with c′=−1, so c(1)−c(0)=−1≠0 by the fundamental theorem of calculus, contradicting the periodicity c(1)=c(0).

ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passOpen item page →

The isotropic oscillator: the explicit flow, YTJY=J and det⁡Y=1

Example

Let n=1, U=R2 with coordinates (q,p), and H(q,p)=(p2+q2)/2. Then:

  1. XH=(p,−q) and its flow is Φt(q,p)=(qcos⁡t+psin⁡t, −qsin⁡t+pcos⁡t), defined for all t∈R;
  2. the derivative Y(t)=DΦt(q,p)=(cos⁡tsin⁡t−sin⁡tcos⁡t) satisfies Y′(t)=J Hess H Y(t), Y(0)=I2, Y(t)TJ Y(t)=J and det⁡Y(t)=1 for all t, in accordance with The derivative of the Hamiltonian flow satisfies YTJY=J and det⁡Y=1.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Hamiltonian H(q,p)=(p2+q2)/2 on R2 and the matrix J=(01−10).

[F1]

Hamiltonian field (The Hamiltonian field of a C2 function on a phase domain is J∇H, and the Poisson bracket is ∑i(∂qif ∂pig−∂pif ∂qig)): Hq=q, Hp=p, so XH=(Hp,−Hq)=(p,−q); hence the flow solves q′=p, p′=−q.

[F2]

Trigonometric calculus (The derivatives of sine and cosine are cosine and minus sine, The addition formulas for sine and cosine, Sine and cosine defined by their real power series): sin⁡′=cos⁡, cos⁡′=−sin⁡, and Φt as displayed is the solution of the linear system with Φ0=id, since differentiating the displayed expressions gives q′=−qsin⁡t+pcos⁡t=p(t) and p′=−qcos⁡t−psin⁡t=−q(t).

[F3]

The matrix identity (The derivative of the Hamiltonian flow satisfies YTJY=J and det⁡Y=1, The standard two-form of a phase domain is closed and nondegenerate, with contraction ιvω=∑iai dpi−∑ibi dqi, The Hessian matrix and critical points of a scalar field): for a C2 Hamiltonian the flow derivative satisfies Y′=J Hess H Y, YTJY=J and det⁡Y=1, the Hessian being the matrix of second partial derivatives; here Hess H=I2.

Verification

technique · direct; verify the displayed flow by differentiation and multiply the two-by-two matrices
1.1F1F2algebra

Clause 1: by [F1] the field is XH=(p,−q) and the flow solves the linear system; the displayed Φt satisfies Φ0=id and, by [F2], its derivatives are q′=p(t) and p′=−q(t), so by uniqueness it is the flow, defined for all real t.

1.2F3algebra

Clause 2: differentiating Y(t) entrywise gives Y′(t)=(−sin⁡tcos⁡t−cos⁡t−sin⁡t), while J Hess H Y=JY=(−sin⁡tcos⁡t−cos⁡t−sin⁡t); thus Y′=JY with Y(0)=I2.

2.1F3step 1.2algebra∎

The orthogonality of Y(t) gives YTJY=J by direct multiplication, and det⁡Y=cos⁡2t+sin⁡2t=1; hence both conclusions of [F3] hold explicitly for this flow.

Sources