Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Limited-angle visibility and instability — Examples and Counterexamples

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Logical flowchart

3 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

None yet.

4 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)verified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

A compactly supported bump remains uniquely determined from limited angles

Example

Let Θ⊂S1 be a nonempty proper open antipodally symmetric set whose complement contains a nonempty open arc. Write θ⊥=(−θ2,θ1) and define the line Radon integral by Rg(θ,s)=∫Rg(sθ+tθ⊥) dt using the compact-support Riemann integral in t. Choose a smooth function ψ supported in B1(0) and equal to one on B‾1/2(0). For every h∈Cc∞(B1(0);C), equality of the restricted line data Rh(θ,s)=Rψ(θ,s) for all θ∈Θ and s∈R forces h=ψ. The Fourier-Laplace transforms of these compactly supported functions are entire in each complex frequency coordinate, so their agreement on the measured open wedge determines their values at every real frequency. In particular, Rψ is not identically zero.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The set Θ, a smooth bump ψ supported in B1(0) and equal to one on B‾1/2(0), and a compactly supported smooth function h with the same restricted line data as ψ.

[F1]

Visible covectors for limited-angle data: the Fourier wedge of measured line normals is WΘ={σθ:θ∈Θ, σ≠0}, a nonempty open sector when Θ is nonempty and open.

[F2]

A smooth bump between concentric Euclidean balls: a smooth compactly supported function equal to one on a smaller concentric ball and supported in a larger ball exists.

[F3]

The compact-support Fourier-Laplace transform is entire in each coordinate: the compact-support Riemann Fourier-Laplace transform is entire in each coordinate and restricts to the usual compact-support Fourier transform on real frequencies.

[F4]

The Fourier-slice identity for the Euclidean Radon transform: with the compact-support Riemann line-integral convention, the Fourier transform of Radon data equals the object Fourier transform on the ray σθ.

[F5]

Compactly supported smooth functions are unique from any open set of Radon angles: zero limited-angle data for a compactly supported smooth function force that function to vanish everywhere, by the choice-free analytic-continuation argument.

Verification

technique · direct
1.1F2givenconstruct

The ball B1(0) contains a smaller concentric ball, so [F2] supplies a bump with the stated support and plateau. It is nonzero because it equals one on the nonempty inner ball.

1.2F1F3F4F5given

If h has the same restricted data as ψ, linearity of the line integral gives R(h−ψ)(θ,s)=0 for every measured pair. By [F4], the Fourier transforms of h and ψ agree on WΘ; [F3] identifies these values as restrictions of their coordinate-entire Fourier-Laplace transforms. Applying [F5] to the compactly supported difference h−ψ gives h−ψ=0 everywhere.

2.1F5step 1.1algebra∎

If the data of ψ were zero, [F5] would imply ψ=0, contradicting its value one on B‾1/2(0). Thus its restricted data are nonzero while uniquely determining it in the stated compact-support class.

ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-generatedverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

Rapid oscillations make limited-angle data smaller than every power

Example

Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice. Take Ω=B2(0), K=B‾1(0), Θ={θ∈S1:∣θ1∣<1/2}, and v=(1,0). Write θ⊥=(−θ2,θ1) and define RΘu(θ,s)=∫Ru(sθ+tθ⊥) dt for θ∈Θ, s∈R. Give the data space D=L2(Θ×R,dθ ds) the norm ∥g∥D=(∫Θ∫R∣g(θ,s)∣2 ds dθ)1/2, with arc-length measure dθ and Lebesgue measure ds, and define ∥u∥H1=(∥u∥22+∥∂1u∥22+∥∂2u∥22)1/2 using Lebesgue measure on R2. Then Θ is open and antipodally symmetric, its complement contains open horizontal arcs, and inf⁡θ∈Θ∣v⋅θ⊥∣=3/2. For every M>0, the class of smooth functions supported in K with H1 norm at most M has no uniform Hölder stability estimate from the restricted Radon data. More explicitly, choose a real bump ψ∈Cc∞(B1(0)) with ∥ψ∥2=1, set λM=M/[2(1+∥∇ψ∥2+2π)], and let uN(x)=λMN−1e2πiNx1ψ(x) for integers N≥1. These functions have the same compact support, satisfy ∥uN∥H1≤M and ∥uN∥2=λMN−1, while for every integer m≥1 there is Cm<∞ with ∥RΘuN∥D≤CmN−m−1.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Countable Choice and the stated domain Ω, fixed support K, measured normals Θ, direction v, and bump ψ.

[F1]

Visible covectors for limited-angle data: θ⊥=(−θ2,θ1) is the unit line tangent, so for v=(1,0) one has ∣v⋅θ⊥∣=∣θ2∣.

[F2]

A smooth bump between concentric Euclidean balls: a smooth bump supported in B1(0) and equal to one on a smaller ball exists.

[F3]

A box in Rn with parameters ai≤bi is Lebesgue measurable of measure ∏i<n(bi−ai), whichever of its faces are included: a nondegenerate box has strictly positive Lebesgue measure, so a bump equal to one on a ball has positive L2 norm and can be normalized.

[F4]

Limited-angle inversion has no Hölder modulus on a fixed-support H1 ball: if a fixed-support bump is normalized in L2 and ∣v⋅θ⊥∣ is uniformly bounded below on Θ, its modulations uN=λN−1e2πiNv⋅xψ have H1 norm bounded by λ(1+∥∇ψ∥2+2π) and restricted data bounded by CmN−m−1 for every m; this is the proposition's proved integration-by-parts estimate.

[A1]

The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω): Countable Choice is used in the box-measure supplier [F3] and in [F4]'s Lebesgue change-of-variables and integration-by-parts estimates.

Verification

technique · direct
1.1F1givenalgebra

The set Θ is the inverse image of the open interval (−1/2,1/2) under the continuous coordinate map θ↦θ1, so it is open; changing θ to −θ preserves ∣θ1∣, so it is antipodally symmetric. Its complement contains arcs around (1,0) and (−1,0). For every θ∈Θ, ∣θ2∣=1−θ12>3/2, hence the infimum is at least 3/2; approaching either boundary ∣θ1∣=1/2 shows the infimum is exactly 3/2. By [F1] this is inf⁡θ∈Θ∣v⋅θ⊥∣.

1.2A1F2F3givenconstruct

A translated or rescaled bump from [F2] has compact support in B1(0) and equals one on a smaller ball. That inner ball contains a nondegenerate box, which has positive measure by [F3]; compact support makes its L2 norm finite, and the plateau makes the norm positive. Divide by this norm to obtain the required real ψ with ∥ψ∥2=1. Since K=B‾1(0) lies inside Ω=B2(0), its support is contained in the fixed set K.

2.1F4A1step 1.1step 1.2algebra

The formula in the Example is the modulation family in [F4]. The chosen λM satisfies λM(1+∥∇ψ∥2+2π)=M/2≤M, and the geometric verification in step 1.1 supplies the positive lower bound required there. Thus the family has the stated fixed support, H1 and L2 bounds, and rapid restricted-data decay.

3.1step 2.1algebra∎

If a uniform Hölder estimate with exponent α>0 and constant C≥0 held on the fixed-support class, choose an integer m≥1 with α(m+1)>1. Step 2.1 would imply λMN−1≤C(CmN−m−1)α, so λM≤CCmαN1−α(m+1)→0, contradicting λM>0. Therefore no such estimate holds.

ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)verified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

A nonzero Schwartz function invisible to a limited-angle Radon transform

Example

Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice. Let Θ⊂S1 be a nonempty proper open antipodally symmetric set such that S1∖Θ‾ contains a nonempty open arc. Choose an open arc J with J‾⊂S1∖Θ‾, put V={rω:1<r<2, ω∈J}, choose a nonzero smooth function q∈Cc∞(V;C), and define f(x)=∫R2q(ξ)e2πix⋅ξ dξ. For θ=(θ1,θ2) write θ⊥=(−θ2,θ1) and, for a Schwartz function g, define RSg(θ,s)=∫Rg(sθ+tθ⊥) dt using Lebesgue measure dt. Let Y=L2(Θ×R,dθ ds), where dθ is arc-length measure and ds is Lebesgue measure. Then f is a nonzero Schwartz function in L2(R2) with Lebesgue measure, its Fourier transform is q, and RSf(θ,s)=0 for every θ∈Θ and s∈R, so both 0 and f give datum 0 in Y without either truth being required to have compact support. For the two-truth class {0,f} with target loss ∥g−h∥L2(R2), every deterministic estimator Φ:Y→L2(R2) satisfies max⁡{∥Φ(0)∥2,∥Φ(0)−f∥2}≥∥f∥2/2>0.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Countable Choice, the normal set Θ, the blind arc J, the annular sector V, and the nonzero smooth function q supported in V from the Example.

[F1]

Visible covectors for limited-angle data: WΘ={σθ:θ∈Θ, σ≠0}, while the directions in S1∖Θ‾ are unmeasured.

[F2]

A smooth bump between concentric Euclidean balls: every nonempty open ball contains a nonzero smooth compactly supported function, by translating and rescaling a concentric bump.

[F3]

Fourier transform acts continuously on Schwartz space: under Countable Choice the negative-sign, 2π-normalized Fourier transform maps Schwartz functions to Schwartz functions.

[F4]

Fourier inversion on Schwartz space: under Countable Choice, g(x)=∫g^(ξ)e2πix⋅ξ dξ for every Schwartz function g.

[F5]

Fourier transform on complex L1 classes: g^(η)=∫g(x)e−2πix⋅η dx for integrable g.

[F6]

A C^1 diffeomorphism satisfies the change-of-variables formula for L^1 functions: under Countable Choice, the reflection x↦−x preserves Lebesgue integrals because its absolute determinant is one.

[F7]

Schwartz derivatives are integrable: under Countable Choice every Schwartz function belongs to Lp for each 1≤p≤∞.

[F8]

Fourier-slice identity for Schwartz inputs: under Countable Choice, RSg^(θ,σ)=g^(σθ) for Schwartz g.

[F9]

The Radon transform maps Schwartz functions to Schwartz offset data: for fixed θ, RSg(θ,⋅) is a Schwartz function.

[F10]

The Lp norm descends to the quotient and makes Lp a normed space for 1≤p≤∞: the L2 quotient norm is a norm and gives the triangle inequality and separation.

[F11]

Kernel directions preclude unrestricted recovery: if two truths share one exact datum, every deterministic data-only estimator has maximum target loss at least half their target distance.

[F12]

Metric space: d(x,y)=0 iff x=y, symmetry, and the triangle inequality; pseudometric and ultrametric: a metric satisfies separation (M1), symmetry (M2), and the triangle inequality (M3); the metric induced by an L2 norm here is d(g,h)=∥g−h∥2.

[A1]

The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω): Countable Choice is assumed by the Fourier transform, inversion, Lp integrability, Fourier-slice, and Lebesgue substitution suppliers [F3], [F4], [F6]–[F9].

Verification

technique · direct
1.1F2givenconstruct

The sector V is a nonempty open subset of R2 because (r,ω)↦rω maps the open parameter set (1,2)×J to an open polar-coordinate sector. It therefore contains a ball; [F2] supplies a nonzero q∈Cc∞(V). This establishes the required bump choice.

1.2F3F4F5F6F7A1givenalgebra

By the Fourier definition [F5], the function in the Example is f(x)=q^(−x). Since q is smooth with compact support, every Schwartz seminorm of q is bounded, so q∈S. By [F3] its transform is Schwartz, and reflection preserves each Schwartz seminorm up to sign, hence f is Schwartz; [F7] gives f∈L2∩L1. The reflection substitution [F6] and inversion [F4] give f^(η)=∫q^(−x)e−2πix⋅η dx=∫q^(y)e2πiy⋅η dy=q(η). Since q≠0, this identity implies f is nonzero as an L1 and L2 class.

1.3A1F1F4F8F9given

For θ∈Θ and σ≠0, the point σθ is outside the support of q because every frequency in V has direction in J and J‾ is disjoint from Θ‾; also q(0)=0 since V avoids the origin. Thus [F8] gives RSf^(θ,σ)=q(σθ)=0 for all real σ. By [F9], the offset function is Schwartz, so Fourier inversion [F4] in one dimension gives RSf(θ,s)=0 for every s.

2.1F10F11F12step 1.2step 1.3∎

Let the parameter and target metric spaces both be L2(R2) with distance d(g,h)=∥g−h∥2, let the admissible truth class be U={0,f}, and let the target map q:U→L2(R2) be inclusion. Give the data space Y=L2(Θ×R) its norm metric and define F:U→Y by the restricted line integrals. The normed-space result [F10] and the metric axioms [F12] give the parameter, target, and data metrics used here. Theorem [F11] applies directly to this truth class and target map. Step 1.3 gives F(0)=F(f)=0, while step 1.2 gives d(q(0),q(f))=∥f∥2>0. Apply [F11] with shared datum 0 and radius 0 to any deterministic estimator Φ:Y→L2(R2); its maximum target loss is at least ∥f∥2/2. This proves the asserted lower bound on the stated two-truth class.

Sources