Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Em Expanded Analysis Prerequisites — Examples

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

The companion page records explicit mathematical checks of the hypotheses and conventions of two items on em-expanded-analysis-prerequisites; it carries domain: mathematics and uses only the mathematical premises of those items.

Outgoing DtN coefficient at degree zero and the explicit PEC topology zero mode works two exact examples: the degree-zero outgoing Dirichlet-to-Neumann coefficient t0=ik−1/R obtained by logarithmic differentiation of the explicit spherical Hankel function, matching the exact DtN bounds of the spherical Hankel lemma; and the smooth shell field ∇(1/∣x∣)=−x/∣x∣3, which is an admissible divergence-free, curl-free member of the PEC graph class and therefore an explicit topology zero mode that a complete spectral description must retain.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, postulates, theorems and proofs

None yet.

5 · Examples, experiments and counterexamples

ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passOpen item page →

Outgoing DtN coefficient at degree zero and the explicit PEC topology zero mode

Example

Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice), as required by the cavity supplier (and hence its Countable-Choice harmonic supplier). The following are explicit mathematical verifications of clauses of Spherical Hankel functions: explicit solutions, constant Wronskian and exact Dirichlet-to-Neumann bounds and Spectral completeness of the curl form in a smooth PEC cavity; no measurement, physical identification or empirical claim is made.

(i) At degree l=0 the outgoing radial function of the spherical Hankel lemma is h0(z)=−ieiz/z, so for k,R>0 the Dirichlet-to-Neumann coefficient of Spherical Hankel functions: explicit solutions, constant Wronskian and exact Dirichlet-to-Neumann bounds is

t0=k h0′(kR)h0(kR)=ik−1R,

whose real part −1/R is negative and whose imaginary part k is positive, exactly as the exact bounds of that lemma require in degree zero.

(ii) Fix 0<a<b. In the spherical shell a<∣x∣<b, the field u(x)=grad⁡∣x∣−1=−x/∣x∣3 is smooth on the closure, nonzero, normal to both boundary spheres, curl-free and divergence-free: u=∇Φ with Φ(x)=∣x∣−1 harmonic off the origin, so curl⁡u=curl⁡∇Φ=0 and div⁡u=ΔΦ=0 there. Thus u lies in the PEC class X of the cavity spectral lemma with zero curl, and it has curl eigenvalue zero: eliminating all topology zero modes would incorrectly discard this explicit admissible vector field.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Choice, k>0, R>0, the shell a<∣x∣<b with 0<a<b, and the functions h0(z)=−ieiz/z and Φ(x)=∣x∣−1.

[L1]

The degree-zero outgoing radial function is h0(z)=−ieiz/z and the DtN coefficients of the spherical Hankel lemma satisfy −(l+1)/R≤Re⁡tl≤−1/R and 0<Im⁡tl≤k, with tl=khl′(kR)/hl(kR) (Spherical Hankel functions: explicit solutions, constant Wronskian and exact Dirichlet-to-Neumann bounds).

[L2]

The curl of a gradient vanishes on its domain (The curl of the gradient of a C2 function vanishes), and Φ(x)=∣x∣−1 is smooth and harmonic on R3∖{0}, so ΔΦ=0 there (The Laplace fundamental solution is harmonic off its pole).

[L4]

The graph completion X of Spectral completeness of the curl form in a smooth PEC cavity contains every smooth field on the closure with ν×u=0, and the curl form there has nonnegative eigenvalues with the topology zero modes retained.

Verification

technique · direct
1.1givenL1L3algebra

Logarithmic differentiation of h0(z)=−ieiz/z by [L3] gives h0′(z)=−ieiz⋅i/z+ieiz/z2=h0(z)(i−1/z); hence kh0′(kR)/h0(kR)=k(i−1/(kR))=ik−1/R, so Re⁡t0=−1/R<0 and Im⁡t0=k>0, consistent with [L1].

1.2givenL2L4algebra

Since Φ is smooth on the shell and u=∇Φ, [L2] gives curl⁡u=0 and div⁡u=ΔΦ=0 on a<∣x∣<b; on the boundary sphere ∣x∣=c the field is u=−x/c3, a nonzero multiple of the outward normal, so its tangential part vanishes and u is in the PEC class X by [L4].

2.1step 1.2L4algebra∎

Because curl⁡u=0 and u≠0, the field u belongs to the kernel of the curl form on V={w∈X:div⁡w=0}: the eigenidentity of [L4] holds with λ=0, so the zero eigenspace is nontrivial and must be retained; discarding all topology zero modes would delete this admissible vector field.

The computation in (i) is the degree-zero instance of the exact DtN bounds; the field in (ii) is the explicit topology zero mode of the spherical shell, and no claim is made about other eigenvalues, about lossy media or about maximal tangential-trace realisations beyond the class X of Spectral completeness of the curl form in a smooth PEC cavity.

Sources