Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Tensor test algebra and positive tempered moment data

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

This page defines positive continuous moment data on the algebraic tensor test algebra, fixes the weak common-domain field and proper-orthochronous Poincaré/Fourier conventions, and proves exactly what the supplied positive moments reconstruct. Covariance, locality, tested equations, and forward-cone matrix-coefficient support each require their displayed additional moment identities; the result does not construct positive interacting data or infer joint energy-momentum generators.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, postulates, theorems and proofs

DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicableverified 2026-10-15 (gpt-6-luna, gpt-6.1-sol, and delegated Codex review/repair agents; see completed run evidence)Open item page →

Positive tempered moments on the tensor test algebra

Definition

Use the Schwartz spaces and their seminorm topologies of Schwartz space and its seminorms and Schwartz topology and convergence. Put S:=S(R4;C) and Sn:=S(R4n;C) for n≥1, and set S0:=C. A tempered distribution in Sn′ means a continuous complex-linear functional on Sn as in Tempered distribution; its pairing with a test is bilinear.

For complex vector spaces S, let S⊗algn be the algebraic tensor product, characterized by multilinear maps out of Sn, with S⊗alg0:=C1. Define the algebraic tensor test algebra T(S):=⨁n≥0algS⊗algn, where the direct sum consists of finite-support sequences. Its multiplication is concatenation of tensor factors, extended bilinearly, and its unit is 1 in degree zero. Its conjugate-linear involution is specified on elementary tensors by (f1⊗⋯⊗fn)∗:=fn‾⊗⋯⊗f1‾,(c1)∗=c‾1.

For fj∈S, the elementary tensor is evaluated against a distribution by the test function Jn(f1⊗⋯⊗fn)(x1,…,xn):=∏j=1nfj(xj). This is in Sn: for multi-indices split into four-coordinate blocks (αj,βj), its Schwartz seminorm is p(αj)j,(βj)j(Jn(f1⊗⋯⊗fn))=∏j=1npαjβj(fj). Thus Jn is multilinear and continuous, and the displayed formula extends linearly to the algebraic tensor product. In degree zero set J0(c1):=c.

By these definitions concatenation is associative with the degree-zero unit, and reversal together with complex conjugation is an involution satisfying (ab)∗=b∗a∗; thus T(S) is a unital complex star algebra.

A positive tempered moment family is a sequence consisting of W0=1 and Wn∈Sn′ for each n≥1 such that the multilinear maps f1,…,fn⟼⟨Wn,Jn(f1⊗⋯⊗fn)⟩ extend, degree by degree and then over finite sums, to a complex-linear functional ω:T(S)→C satisfying ω(1)=1,ω(a∗a)∈[0,∞)(a∈T(S)). Equivalently, the family supplies an actually positive normalized functional on this algebra. Positivity is a hypothesis on the distributions; formal coefficient families do not qualify merely because they obey algebraic identities. No topology on T(S), norm completion, C*-algebra, or existence claim for an interacting field is part of this definition.

DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicableverified 2026-10-15 (gpt-6-luna, gpt-6.1-sol, and delegated Codex review/repair agents; see completed run evidence)Open item page →

Weak operator-valued tempered distribution on a common domain

Definition

Let S=S(R4;C) with its Schwartz topology, let H be a complex Hilbert space, and let D⊆H be a dense complex linear subspace. Use the inner product linear in its first argument and conjugate-linear in its second, as in Real and complex inner-product spaces and their induced length. A weak operator-valued tempered distribution on the common domain D is a complex-linear map Φ:S⟶Lin⁡(D), where Lin⁡(D) is the vector space of linear maps D→D, such that for every u,v∈D the scalar map f⟼(Φ(f)u,v)H is a continuous complex-linear functional on S, hence an element of S′=S′(R4) by Tempered distribution. In particular, every smeared map preserves the same domain D. This definition is weak in the matrix-coefficient sense; it does not define point values Φ(x), operators on all of H, or self-adjoint closures.

DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicableverified 2026-10-15 (gpt-6-luna, gpt-6.1-sol, and delegated Codex review/repair agents; see completed run evidence)Open item page →

Proper-orthochronous Poincaré action and test pullback

Definition

Fix coordinates x=(x0,x)∈R4 and the Minkowski matrix η:=diag⁡(1,−1,−1,−1). The proper-orthochronous Lorentz group is SO+(1,3):={Λ∈GL4(R):ΛTηΛ=η, det⁡Λ=1, Λ00≥1}, with its subspace topology from real 4×4 matrices. The proper-orthochronous Poincaré group is the semidirect product P+↑:=SO+(1,3)⋉R4, with multiplication (Λ,a)(Γ,b)=(ΛΓ,a+Λb), identity e=(I,0), and affine action gx=Λx+a. Its topology is the product topology on the matrix and translation coordinates.

For f∈S:=S(R4;C) define the pointwise pullback formula, viewed initially as a smooth function, Tgf(x):=f(g−1x)=f(Λ−1(x−a)). On smooth functions this formula obeys TgTh=Tgh and Tef=f, by the group law. This definition specifies the formula and conventions; it does not assert that Tgf belongs to S. Translations have the convention T(I,z)f(x)=f(x−z).

With this signature, p⋅z:=p0z0−p⋅z, V‾+:={p∈R4:p0≥∣p∣} is the closed forward cone, and x−y is spacelike exactly when (x0−y0)2−∣x−y∣2<0.

DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicableverified 2026-10-15 (gpt-6-luna, gpt-6.1-sol, and delegated Codex review/repair agents; see completed run evidence)Open item page →

Minkowski Fourier transform and forward-cone support convention

Definition

Assume Countable Choice ACω (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)), as required by the Fourier transform suppliers. With p⋅z from Proper-orthochronous Poincaré action and test pullback, for ψ∈S(R4) set FMψ(z):=∫R4e−ip⋅zψ(p) d4p. To see that this is a continuous automorphism of Schwartz space, write F2π for the Euclidean transform F2πψ(x)=∫e−2πix⋅pψ(p) d4p, as in Fourier transform of a tempered distribution. For u,v∈R4, write u⋅Ev:=∑μ=03uμvμ. Since p⋅z=(ηz)⋅Ep, the same defining integral gives FMψ(z)=(F2πψ)(ηz/(2π)). The map z↦ηz/(2π) is an invertible real-linear substitution, so output composition with it is a continuous automorphism of Schwartz space by Invertible linear substitutions preserve Schwartz space, and F2π is a topological automorphism by Fourier transform is a topological automorphism of Schwartz space.

For D∈S′(R4) define its Minkowski Fourier transform by bilinear transposition, ⟨D^M,ψ⟩:=⟨D,FMψ⟩(ψ∈S(R4)). For a closed set C⊆R4, the statement supp⁡D^M⊆C means ⟨D^M,ψ⟩=0 for every compactly supported smooth ψ whose support is disjoint from C; the inclusion Cc∞(R4)↪S(R4) is Test function inclusion in schwartz space is continuous. In particular, the forward-cone condition means C=V‾+ with the definition in Proper-orthochronous Poincaré action and test pullback. No joint self-adjoint energy-momentum generators are included in this convention.

LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedverified 2026-10-15 (gpt-6-luna, gpt-6.1-sol, and delegated Codex review/repair agents; see completed run evidence)Open item page →

Proper-orthochronous Poincaré pullbacks act continuously on Schwartz space

Statement

For every g∈P+↑, the pullback Tgf(x)=f(g−1x) of Proper-orthochronous Poincaré action and test pullback maps S=S(R4;C) continuously to itself. For each fixed f∈S, the map g↦Tgf from P+↑ to S is continuous. Consequently, αg(f1⊗⋯⊗fn):=Tgf1⊗⋯⊗Tgfn extends algebraically to a unital star-automorphism of the algebraic tensor test algebra Positive tempered moments on the tensor test algebra, and αgαh=αgh. No topology on the algebraic direct sum is asserted.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: P+↑ and Tg as in Proper-orthochronous Poincaré action and test pullback, S=S(R4;C), and the algebraic tensor test algebra of Positive tempered moments on the tensor test algebra.

[F1]

Proper-orthochronous Poincaré action and test pullback: g=(Λ,a) acts by Tgf(x)=f(Λ−1(x−a)), and the group has its matrix/translation topology.

[F2]

Schwartz space and its seminorms: the seminorms are pαβ(f)=sup⁡x∣xα∂βf(x)∣.

[F3]

Schwartz topology and convergence: neighborhoods constrain only finitely many such seminorms.

[F4]

Positive tempered moments on the tensor test algebra: T(S) has finite sums, concatenation product, and the involution reverses tensor order and conjugates the factors.

Proof

1.1F1F2algebra

Fix g=(Λ,a). The affine chain rule expresses each ∂β(Tgf)(x) as a finite sum cβγ(Λ)(∂γf)(Λ−1(x−a)), where ∣γ∣=∣β∣ and the coefficients are polynomials in the entries of Λ−1. Substituting y=Λ−1(x−a) gives x=Λy+a; expanding each monomial xα therefore bounds every pαβ(Tgf) by a finite sum of Schwartz seminorms of f with coefficients depending on g. Hence Tgf∈S and Tg:S→S is a continuous linear map.

2.1F1F2F3step 1.1algebra

For g near e, put εg:=∥Λ−1−I∥+∣Λ−1a∣ and yt:=(I+t(Λ−1−I))x−tΛ−1a for 0≤t≤1. Choose the neighborhood so ∥t(Λ−1−I)∥<1/2 for every t; the geometric series for the inverse then gives ∥(I+t(Λ−1−I))−1∥≤2. Thus 1+∣x∣≤C(1+∣yt∣) uniformly in x,t,g. Writing δg(x):=(Λ−1−I)x−Λ−1a, the fundamental theorem of calculus gives ∂βf(y1)−∂βf(x)=∫01∑j=14∂β+ejf(yt) δg,j(x) dt. Here ∣δg,j(x)∣≤εg(1+∣x∣). After multiplying by xα, the weight comparison bounds the absolute value by Cαβεg times a finite sum of seminorms pγ,β+ej(f) with ∣γ∣≤∣α∣+1: expand (1+∣yt∣)∣α∣+1 into finitely many coordinate monomials and use the definition of each seminorm. In step 1.1 the chain-rule coefficients are polynomials in Λ−1 and tend to their identity coefficients as g→e; their differences are bounded by Cαβεg, while each remaining weighted derivative is bounded by finitely many Schwartz seminorms using the same comparison. Therefore pαβ(Tgf−f)→0 for every α,β as g→e. By [F3] this is convergence in the Schwartz topology.

3.1F1F4step 1.1step 2.1algebra∎

For any g0, the group law gives Tgf=Tg0(Tg0−1gf). Step 2.1 and continuity of the fixed map Tg0 from step 1.1 show Tgf→Tg0f as g→g0. Thus the pullback is continuous in the group parameter everywhere. The universal property of algebraic tensor products defines αg on each tensor degree; concatenation, conjugation, reversal, and TgTh=Tgh give the unital star-automorphism and action identities.

TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedverified 2026-10-15 (gpt-6-luna, gpt-6.1-sol, and delegated Codex review/repair agents; see completed run evidence)Open item page →

Tested positive moments reconstruct closable smeared fields

Statement

Assume Countable Choice ACω (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)) and let (Wn)n≥0 be a positive tempered moment family on T(S) as in Positive tempered moments on the tensor test algebra. Write ω for its linear extension, and let P+↑, Tg, and αg be the group and pullbacks of Proper-orthochronous Poincaré action and test pullback and Proper-orthochronous Poincaré pullbacks act continuously on Schwartz space. Let (Hω,Dω,πω,Ωω) be the GNS construction of GNS Hilbert reconstruction with invariant operator domain for this functional, with the first-variable- linear Hilbert pairing.

For f∈S, put X(f):=f in degree one and Φ(f):=πω(X(f))∣Dω. Then Dω is a common invariant dense domain, every Φ(f) is closable with Φ(f‾)=Φ(f)∗∣Dω, and Φ is a weak operator-valued tempered distribution in the exact sense of Weak operator-valued tempered distribution on a common domain. Its vacuum moments are exactly the input: (Φ(f1)⋯Φ(fn)Ωω,Ωω)=⟨Wn,Jn(f1⊗⋯⊗fn)⟩.

The following additional conclusions are conditional on additional moment identities.

  1. If ω∘αg=ω for every g∈P+↑, then there is a strongly continuous unitary representation g↦Ug on Hω fixing Ωω and satisfying UgΦ(f)Ug−1∣Dω=Φ(Tgf)(g∈P+↑, f∈S).

  2. Let f,h∈D(R4)=Cc∞(R4;C) be the complex test functions of Test function space d of an open set, viewed as elements of S under the canonical inclusion of Test function inclusion in schwartz space is continuous. In this definition, supp⁡f and supp⁡h are the closures in R4 of their nonzero sets and hence compact. If these supports are spacelike separated, meaning (x0−y0)2−∣x−y∣2<0 for every x∈supp⁡f, y∈supp⁡h, and ω(b∗[X(f),X(h)]a)=0(a,b∈T(S)), then [Φ(f),Φ(h)]=0 on Dω. More generally, any polynomial relation r∈T(S) satisfying ω(b∗ra)=0 for all a,b∈T(S) is represented by πω(r)=0 on Dω; tested field equations are instances of this statement when their required identities are assumed.

  3. For translations τz=(I,z) define Db,a(z):=ω(b∗ατz(a))(a,b∈T(S)). If ω is translation-invariant, each Db,a is a bounded continuous function and hence a regular tempered distribution; applying the symmetry-implementation lemma to the translation subgroup gives strongly continuous unitaries Uτz. If, in addition, supp⁡D^b,a,M⊆V‾+ for every a,b, with the Fourier convention of Minkowski Fourier transform and forward-cone support convention, then the reconstructed translation matrix coefficients z⟼(Uτzπω(a)Ωω,πω(b)Ωω) have precisely the same Fourier support. This is a matrix-coefficient spectrum condition; it does not assert joint self-adjoint energy-momentum generators or their joint spectral measure.

This theorem reconstructs a weak field only from supplied, actually positive continuous moments. It does not construct an unspecified positive functional, complete a formal perturbation series, or establish the full Wightman reconstruction theorem with assumptions not listed here.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice ACω; a positive tempered moment family (Wn); the proper-orthochronous Poincaré pullback of Proper-orthochronous Poincaré action and test pullback; and the GNS inputs described below. The covariance, locality, and spectrum conclusions use only the additional identities stated alongside those conclusions.

[A1]

Countable Choice ACω (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)) is assumed for the Hilbert completion in the GNS supplier and for its cited Fourier suppliers; no full Axiom of Choice is assumed.

[F1]

Positive tempered moments on the tensor test algebra: T(S) consists of finite sums of algebraic tensor powers with concatenation product and reversal/conjugation involution; each Wn is a continuous linear functional on S(R4n); the extension satisfies ω(1)=1 and ω(a∗a)≥0.

[F2]

GNS Hilbert reconstruction with invariant operator domain: under Countable Choice and these positive normalized algebraic-state hypotheses, the quotient has a Hilbert completion and a common invariant dense domain Dω, with πω(a)[b]=[ab], Ωω=[1], and ω(a)=(πω(a)Ωω,Ωω); each represented operator is closable and its adjoint restricts to πω(a∗) on the common domain.

[F3]

Positive-state Cauchy–Schwarz and left radical: ∣ω(b∗a)∣2≤ω(a∗a)ω(b∗b), including zero-norm cases.

[F4]

Weak operator-valued tempered distribution on a common domain: weak operator-valued temperedness means continuity of each first-variable-linear matrix coefficient f↦(Φ(f)u,v) for u,v∈Dω.

[F5]

Proper-orthochronous Poincaré action and test pullback and Proper-orthochronous Poincaré pullbacks act continuously on Schwartz space: Tgf(x)=f(g−1x); the pullbacks are continuous on S and induce a group of unital star-automorphisms αg on the algebraic tensor algebra, with continuous coefficient dependence for each finite tensor polynomial.

[F6]

State-preserving symmetries implemented unitarily: for a state-preserving action of a topological group, continuity at the identity of every coefficient g↦ω(b∗αg(a)) yields a strongly continuous unitary implementation on the GNS Hilbert space, fixing the cyclic vector and implementing the action on the common domain.

[F7]

Minkowski Fourier transform and forward-cone support convention: D^M is defined by bilinear transposition of FMψ(z)=∫e−ip⋅zψ(p)d4p; support in V‾+ means vanishing on every compact test supported off that cone.

[F8]

Polynomial growth functions define tempered distributions: a locally integrable function bounded by a polynomial outside compact sets defines a regular tempered distribution.

[A2]

For covariance, assume ω∘αg=ω for every g∈P+↑.

[A3]

For tested locality, assume the displayed commutator moment identity for all a,b∈T(S) and all f,h∈D(R4) with the stated spacelike-separated supports.

[A4]

For tested relations, fix r∈T(S) and assume ω(b∗ra)=0 for every a,b∈T(S).

[A5]

For the matrix-coefficient spectrum conclusion, assume translation invariance ω∘ατz=ω and supp⁡D^b,a,M⊆V‾+ for every a,b∈T(S).

Proof

1.1F1algebra

For f1,…,fn∈S, the product test map Jn satisfies the seminorm identity in [F1]: every joint Schwartz seminorm is the product of the corresponding four-dimensional seminorms. It is therefore continuous multilinear. Since each Wn is continuous, fixing all but one factor and evaluating Wn on Jn gives a continuous linear functional of the remaining test.

1.2F1F2A1given

Apply [F2] to the positive normalized functional ω on the unital star algebra T(S). Under the Countable Choice premise [A1] this produces Hω, the common invariant dense quotient domain Dω, the closable representation πω, and the unit cyclic vector Ωω.

1.3F2A3A4algebra

Assume [A4]. For the fixed r, [F2] gives (πω(r)[a],[b])=ω(b∗ra)=0 for every a,b. The classes [b] are dense in Hω, so πω(r)[a]=0 for each [a]∈Dω; hence πω(r)=0 on Dω. Taking r=X(f)X(h)−X(h)X(f) and [A3] proves the stated locality conclusion. Any tested field equation is obtained by the same substitution of its own polynomial relation, without adding an unstated identity.

2.1F1F2F4step 1.1

For a,b∈T(S), the GNS quotient pairing gives (Φ(f)[a],[b])=ω(b∗X(f)a). Because a and b are finite sums, the right-hand side is a finite sum of distributions Wn evaluated on product tests with f in one tensor slot. Step 1.1 makes each term continuous and linear in f. Thus every matrix coefficient is tempered, and [F4] shows that Φ is a weak operator-valued tempered distribution on the common domain.

2.2F1F2step 1.2algebra

The degree-one map f↦X(f) is complex-linear and left multiplication preserves Dω, so Φ:S→Lin⁡(Dω) is linear and has the stated common invariant domain. By [F2], each Φ(f) is closable and Φ(f‾)=Φ(f)∗∣Dω. Repeated application of πω(X(fj))[a]=[X(fj)a] gives (Φ(f1)⋯Φ(fn)Ωω,Ωω)=ω(X(f1)⋯X(fn))=⟨Wn,Jn(f1⊗⋯⊗fn)⟩, which is the asserted moment identity for n≥1. For n=0, the empty product is Ωω and (Ωω,Ωω)=ω(1)=W0=⟨W0,J0(1)⟩.

2.3F1F5step 1.1algebra

For fixed a,b, expand them as finite sums of tensor monomials. Under αg, each test factor varies continuously in Schwartz space by [F5]; the product maps Jn are continuous by step 1.1, so each Wn evaluation and hence g↦ω(b∗αg(a)) is continuous at the identity.

3.1F5F6A2step 1.2step 2.3

Under the additional invariance hypothesis [A2], the hypotheses of [F6] hold because step 2.3 provides the required coefficient continuity. The lemma supplies strongly continuous unitaries Ug fixing Ωω and implementing αg on Dω. Since αg(X(f))=X(Tgf), its covariance identity gives UgΦ(f)Ug−1∣Dω=Φ(Tgf).

3.2F3F5F8A5step 2.3algebra

Assume [A5]. For fixed a,b, [F3] and translation invariance give ∣Db,a(z)∣2=∣ω(b∗ατz(a))∣2≤ω(b∗b) ω(ατz(a)∗ατz(a))=ω(b∗b) ω(a∗a), uniformly in z. The coefficient is continuous in z by the argument of step 2.3 and the translation subgroup's topology, so it is locally integrable. Its boundedness is polynomial growth of degree zero; [F8] therefore makes it a regular tempered distribution.

3.3F6A5step 2.3given

Under translation invariance in [A5], restrict the action to the translation subgroup R4. Step 2.3 gives continuity at the identity of each coefficient on this subgroup; [F6] therefore supplies strongly continuous unitaries Uτz fixing Ωω and implementing ατz on Dω.

4.1F2F7A5step 3.3algebra∎

The GNS state-recovery identity and step 3.3 give Db,a(z)=(πω(ατz(a))Ωω,πω(b)Ωω)=(Uτzπω(a)Ωω,πω(b)Ωω). Equal tempered distributions have equal transposed Fourier transforms by [F7], so the assumed support of D^b,a,M is exactly the support of the reconstructed matrix coefficient. No generator or spectral-measure assertion is used.

5 · Examples, experiments and counterexamples

None yet.

Sources