Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Function-space priors and sample regularity

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Logical flowchart

3 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

Weighted coefficient spaces form a Hilbert scale

Statement

Assume countable choice. Let H0 be a separable real Hilbert space with a complete orthonormal basis indexed by the disjoint union of a finite set I∗ and the level indices (ℓ,k) with ℓ≥0 and 0≤k<2ℓ. Write the basis vectors as (ei)i∈I∗ and (eℓk). For r≥0, define Hr:={x∈H0:∑i∈I∗∣⟨x,ei⟩H0∣2+∑ℓ≥022rℓ∑k<2ℓ∣⟨x,eℓk⟩H0∣2<∞}, with inner product given by the corresponding weighted coefficient sum and norm squared ∥x∥Hr2:=∑i∈I∗∣⟨x,ei⟩H0∣2+∑ℓ≥022rℓ∑k<2ℓ∣⟨x,eℓk⟩H0∣2. Then Hr is a separable real Hilbert space. Its displayed basis is complete and orthogonal in Hr, with squared basis norms 1 on the finite family and 22rℓ on level ℓ, and the inclusion Hr↪H0 is continuous with operator norm at most 1.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable choice, H0, its finite orthonormal family and level-indexed orthonormal families, and r≥0.

[A1]

Countable choice is the principle that every countable family of nonempty sets has a choice function. The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)

[F1]

Under countable choice, a complete orthonormal family satisfies Parseval's identity: the sum of squared coefficients of each vector equals its squared norm. Parseval equivalences for an orthonormal family

[F2]

Real square-summable sequences with their canonical inner product are complete and hence Hilbert. The real square-summable sequence space is complete

[F3]

Under countable choice, square-summable coefficients on an orthonormal family give a norm-convergent sum whose limit has those coefficients and the corresponding squared norm. Square-summable orthogonal families have norm-convergent finite sums

[F4]

A topological space is separable when it has an at most countable dense subset. Separability: the existence of an at most countable dense subset

Proof

Given: Countable choice, H0, (eℓk), and r≥0 as in the Statement.

1.1A1F1givenconstructalgebra

Write m=∣I∗∣ and enumerate the basis by placing the finite family first, followed by (ℓ,k) at index m+(2ℓ−1)+k, since 2ℓ−1 is the number of level indices below ℓ. For x∈Hr, define Trx by (Trx)t=⟨x,eit⟩H0 for the finite coordinates and (Trx)m+(2ℓ−1)+k=2rℓ⟨x,eℓk⟩H0. Parseval [F1] gives ∥Trx∥ℓ22=∥x∥Hr2, so Tr is an isometry into real ℓ2(N).

2.1A1F2F3step 1.1givenconstructalgebra

Given b∈ℓ2(N,R), set the finite-family coefficients equal to its first m coordinates and put aℓk=2−rℓbm+(2ℓ−1)+k. Since r≥0, the sum of squares of all these coefficients is at most ∑n∣bn∣2<∞. By [F3], their orthonormal expansion converges in H0 to a vector x with those coefficients. Thus x∈Hr and Trx=b, so Tr is onto. By [F2], the isometric pullback of the real ℓ2 inner product makes Hr complete, and hence a real Hilbert space.

3.1F4step 1.1step 2.1algebra

The finite-support rational sequences form a countable subset of real ℓ2: each is encoded by a finite list of coordinate indices, integer numerators, and positive denominators, and such finite integer lists have an explicit natural-number encoding. Given b∈ℓ2 and ε>0, choose N≥1 so that (∑n≥N∣bn∣2)1/2<ε/2, then choose rationals q0,…,qN−1 with ∣bn−qn∣<ε/(2N) for each 0≤n<N, and set qn=0 for n≥N. Then ∥b−q∥22=∑n<N∣bn−qn∣2+∑n≥N∣bn∣2<ε2/2<ε2, so these finite-support rational sequences are dense. Because Tr is an isometric bijection by steps 1.1 and 2.1, their inverse images are a countable dense subset of Hr. Hence Hr is separable by [F4].

4.1A1F1step 3.1givenalgebra∎

Each basis vector has a single nonzero coefficient, so its squared Hr norm is 1 on I∗ and 22rℓ on level ℓ; distinct basis vectors are orthogonal under the weighted inner product. The finite-support coefficient vectors are dense by step 3.1, so the orthogonal family is complete in Hr. Finally Parseval [F1] gives ∥x∥H02=∑i∈I∗∣⟨x,ei⟩∣2+∑ℓ,k∣⟨x,eℓk⟩∣2≤∥x∥Hr2 for x∈Hr, because 22rℓ≥1. Thus the inclusion has operator norm at most 1.

LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

Coordinate vectors form the Hilbert basis of real ell-two

Statement

Let H=ℓ2(N,R) with its canonical real inner product, and for each j∈N let ej be the sequence whose jth coordinate is 1 and whose other coordinates are 0. Then (ej)j∈N is a complete orthonormal basis of H. For every x=(xj)∈H, the truncations ∑j<Nxjej converge in H to x as N→∞ (the N=0 sum is empty and equals 0), and ∥x∥22=∑j∈N∣xj∣2.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The real sequence Hilbert space H=ℓ2(N,R) and the coordinate vectors (ej).

[F1]

Square summability means ∑j∣xj∣2<∞, the norm squared is that sum, and finite tails of the sum can be made arbitrarily small. Square-summable families on an arbitrary index set and the space ℓ2(I)

[F2]

The canonical inner product makes real ℓ2(N) a complete real Hilbert space. The real square-summable sequence space is complete

[F3]

An orthonormal family is a Hilbert basis when its closed linear span is the whole Hilbert space. Orthonormal families, complete orthonormal systems and Hilbert bases

Proof

Given: H=ℓ2(N,R) and ej with coordinate 1 at j and 0 elsewhere.

1.1F1F2givenalgebra

For all i,j, the canonical inner product gives ⟨ei,ej⟩=δij, so the coordinate family is orthonormal.

2.1F1F3step 1.1givenalgebra∎

Let x=(xj)∈H and ε>0. By [F1], a finite set of coordinates has complement square-sum less than ε2. Every finite subset of N is contained in {j:j<N} for some N∈N, so choose N such that ∑j≥N∣xj∣2<ε2. The coordinate formula gives ∥x−∑j<Nxjej∥22=∑j≥N∣xj∣2<ε2. Thus finite linear combinations of the ej are dense in H; by [F3], the orthonormal family is a complete orthonormal basis. The same tail estimate proves the stated truncation convergence, and the norm identity is [F1].

DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablejudge pass (gpt-6-luna)verified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

A Borel prior concentrated on a forward-map domain

Definition

Let X be a specified real separable Banach or Hilbert parameter space with metric dX(x,x′)=∥x−x′∥X and its norm topology. Let (Y,dY) be a metric data space equipped with a sigma-algebra ΣY, let U⊆X be a nonempty admissible truth set, and let F:U→Y be a forward map. Choose a Borel set D∈B(X) with D⊆U such that the restriction G:=F∣D:D→Y is measurable for the trace Borel sigma-algebra B(D):={D∩A:A∈B(X)}. A prior on this forward domain is a Borel probability measure μ on X such that μ(D)=1. Its restriction μ∣D, defined by μ∣D(A)=μ(A) for A∈B(D), is then a probability measure on D, and the induced data law is G#(μ∣D), defined by G#(μ∣D)(E)=(μ∣D)(G−1(E)) for E∈ΣY. A Borel probability on X with μ(D)<1 is not a prior on this declared forward domain.

LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)verified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

Weighted Hilbert Gaussian series and prior regularity

Statement

Let H0 and H1 be separable real Hilbert spaces with a continuous inclusion H1↪H0. Let (ej)j≥1 be an orthonormal basis of H0 that is a complete orthogonal basis of H1, write wj=∥ej∥H12>0, and set fj=ej/wj, so (fj)j≥1 is an orthonormal basis of H1. Let (ξj)j≥1 be independent real random variables on one probability space with Eξj=0 and Eξj2=1, and let λj≥0 satisfy ∑j≥1λjwj<∞. Then SN=∑j=1Nλj ξjej converges almost surely in H1 and in L2(Ω;H1) to an H1-valued Borel-measurable random element S, with E∥S∥H12=∑j≥1λjwj. These norm-convergence conclusions use no choice axiom beyond the supplied probability space and variables. For the following Gaussian conclusions, assume in addition that each ξj has the standard normal law N(0,1). Under the Axiom of Choice and countable choice, S is a centered Borel Gaussian random element in H1. Its covariance map C:H1∗→H1, transported to H1 by the Hilbert-space Riesz identification, is diagonal in the basis (fj)j≥1 with eigenvalues λjwj, and these eigenvalues are summable. If D is a Borel forward-map domain in H1 and P(S∈D)=1, then the law of S is a prior on D. Under the Axiom of Choice there is a>0 such that Eexp⁡ ⁣(a∥S∥H12)<∞.

Statement references

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Separable real Hilbert spaces H0,H1 with the stated continuous inclusion and common orthogonal basis; positive weights wj=∥ej∥H12; a probability space carrying independent real variables ξj with Eξj=0 and Eξj2=1; nonnegative λj with ∑jλjwj<∞. For the Gaussian conclusions, also assume each ξj∼N(0,1). AC and countable choice are assumed only for the stated Gaussian-law, covariance, and exponential-integrability branches.

[A1]

AC is required by the library's Borel Gaussian, covariance/RKHS, and Fernique interfaces. The Axiom of Choice

[A2]

Countable choice is used only by [F3] for scalar Gaussian-law identification and by [F8] for Hilbert-space Riesz representation. The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)

[F1]

A prior on a declared Borel forward-map domain D is a Borel probability μ on the parameter space with μ(D)=1. A Borel prior concentrated on a forward-map domain

[F2]

A centered Borel Gaussian random element is Borel measurable and every continuous linear functional of it has a centered normal law. Centered Borel Gaussian random element on a separable Banach space

[F3]

Under countable choice, if independent standard normal variables have real coefficients with square-summable squares and their finite sums converge in probability to a supplied real random variable, that limit has the centered normal law with variance equal to the sum of coefficient squares. Density normal laws and square-summable Gaussian series under countable choice

[F4]

For nonnegative measurable YN↑Y, monotone convergence gives EYN↑EY. Monotone convergence for the integral

[F5]

Under AC, a centered Borel Gaussian random element in a real separable Banach space has an exponential-square norm moment for some positive exponent. Fernique integrability for a separable Banach Gaussian law

[F6]

Under AC, the covariance operator of a centered Borel Gaussian is Cℓ=E[ℓ(S)S] and its covariance RKHS is the completion of the quotient by the covariance nullspace. Covariance operator and reproducing-kernel Hilbert space of a Banach Gaussian

[F7]

Under AC, the Bochner covariance and the continuous injective embedding of the completed covariance RKHS into the Banach space are well-defined. The Banach Gaussian covariance and RKHS construction is well-defined

[F8]

Under countable choice, every bounded linear functional on a Hilbert space is the inner product with a unique vector, preserving the dual norm. Riesz representation for Hilbert spaces

[F9]

A bounded linear map commutes with the Bochner integral of an integrable vector-valued function. Bounded linear maps commute with Bochner integration

Proof

Given: H0,H1,(ej),(wj),(ξj),(λj) as in the Statement, and AC and countable choice for the Gaussian-law, covariance, and Fernique conclusions.

1.1F4givenalgebra

Put YN=∑j=1Nλjwjξj2 and Y=lim⁡NYN. The supplied second moments give EYN=∑j≤Nλjwj, so [F4] gives EY=∑jλjwj<∞. Therefore Y<∞ almost surely: if P(Y=∞)>0, then EY≥MP(Y=∞) for every M>0, contradicting finiteness. On the full-measure event Ω0={Y<∞}, orthogonality gives ∥Sm−Sn∥H12=∑n<j≤mλjwjξj2→0 as m,n→∞. Completeness of H1 gives an almost-sure limit. This convergence argument uses no choice axiom.

2.1step 1.1givenconstructalgebra

Define S to be this limit on Ω0 and 0 on its measurable null complement. Each SN is Borel measurable. For any proper open O⊂H1, let C=H1∖O. The scalar functions d(SN,C) are measurable and on Ω0 converge to d(S,C); because S∈O exactly when d(S,C)>0, the set S−1(O) is Ω0∩{lim inf⁡Nd(SN,C)>0}, with Ω0c added exactly when 0∈O. The liminf condition is a countable combination of measurable scalar inequalities, so S−1(O) is measurable. The cases O=∅ and O=H1 are immediate. Thus S is Borel measurable.

3.1F4step 1.1step 2.1algebra

On Ω0, ∥S−SN∥H12=Y−YN. Since P(Ω0c)=0, [F4] and step 1.1 give E∥S−SN∥H12=∑j>Nλjwj→0 and E∥S∥H12=∑jλjwj. Hence SN→S in L2(Ω;H1).

4.1A1A2F2F3F6F7F8F9step 2.1step 3.1givenalgebra

For any ℓ∈H1∗, let z∈H1 be its Riesz vector and write ℓz(x)=⟨x,z⟩, so ℓ=ℓz. Set cj=λj ℓz(ej)=λjwj ⟨fj,z⟩. Since ∣⟨fj,z⟩∣≤∥z∥, ∑jcj2≤∥z∥2∑jλjwj<∞. By step 3.1, ℓz(SN)→ℓz(S) in L2, hence in probability; [F3] makes ℓz(S) centered normal with variance ∑jcj2. Together with step 2.1 and [F2], this proves that S is a centered Borel Gaussian random element. For Riesz vectors z,y∈H1, independence, centering, and unit variances give E[ℓz(SN)ℓy(SN)]=∑j≤Nλjwj⟨fj,z⟩⟨fj,y⟩. The L2 convergence from step 3.1 and Cauchy–Schwarz let these expectations pass to the limit, so the covariance form is Q(ℓz,ℓy)=∑jλjwj⟨fj,z⟩⟨fj,y⟩. The series vz:=∑jλjwj⟨fj,z⟩fj converges in H1: the finite Pythagorean identity gives ∑j≤N∣⟨fj,z⟩∣2≤∥z∥2, and sup⁡jλjwj≤∑jλjwj<∞, so ∑j(λjwj)2∣⟨fj,z⟩∣2<∞. Thus Q(ℓz,ℓy)=⟨vz,y⟩. By [F6]–[F7] the covariance Bochner integral exists, and [F9] shows that applying any Riesz coordinate functional commutes with that integral. Hence vz is the Riesz vector of Cℓz, so the covariance operator transported to H1 by Riesz is diagonal in (fj) with eigenvalues λjwj, whose sum is finite.

5.1F1step 4.1algebra

If D⊂H1 is a Borel forward-map domain with P(S∈D)=1, then the law μ of S satisfies μ(D)=P(S∈D)=1. The definition [F1] therefore makes μ a prior on D.

6.1A1F5step 4.1∎

The space H1 is a real separable Banach space, and step 4.1 supplies a centered Borel Gaussian random element in it. Under AC, [F5] applies and gives a>0 with Eexp⁡(a∥S∥H12)<∞.

4 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

None yet.

Sources