Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Adopted trivial-potential classical charged scalar model — Examples

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

Scope

The example checks the exact zero-scalar branch when the scalar self-potential vanishes at zero. It verifies the scalar equation, current, and Hilbert stress directly, then reduces the coupled field equations to source-free Einstein–Maxwell. The calculation is conditional on the model statement and does not report an observation or establish empirical validity.

The zero-scalar sector also covers the declared classical finite-regularity branch. Its Cauchy conclusion follows by zero scalar wave energy with bounded classical coefficients; smooth geometric uniqueness is used only for smooth data. The potential condition is V(0)=0, with no requirement that V′(0) vanish.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, postulates, theorems and proofs

None yet.

5 · Examples, experiments and counterexamples

ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)Open item page →

Adopted zero-scalar model sector

Physical scope

Exact zero-scalar reduction of the classical finite-regularity trivial-potential charged-scalar model when V(0)=0. It is a conditional model calculation with no empirical, quantum, or nontrivial-bundle claim.

Example

Let U be an open region of a smooth Hausdorff, second-countable, oriented underlying four-manifold with a time-oriented C3 Lorentzian metric g of signature (−,+,+,+). Let A be a C2 global real one-form on U and set F:=dA. Assume the source-free Einstein–Maxwell equations of Local evolution of the adopted classical charged scalar model hold on U: dF=0,∇aFab=0,Gab+Λgab=κETabEM,TabEM=μ0−1(FacFbc−14gabFcdFcd). Let V be smooth on an open set containing 0, with V(0)=0, and set φ≡0 on U. Then φ is an exact solution of the adopted classical charged-scalar model coupled to this Einstein–Maxwell field: its current and Hilbert stress vanish, so the full equations reduce to the stated source-free equations. For Cauchy data satisfying the hypotheses of Local evolution of the adopted classical charged scalar model and additionally φ0=0 and πn=0, the zero field is the corresponding local branch under that theorem's stated mathematical hypotheses and the adopted model.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The stated classical Lorentzian region, global potential A, and source-free Einstein–Maxwell equations displayed in the Example, together with the model equations of Local evolution of the adopted classical charged scalar model.

[A1]

The adopted smooth real scalar potential satisfies V(0)=0.

[F1]

Local evolution of the adopted classical charged scalar model: the adopted model equations include dF=0, ∇aFab=−μ0jb, Gab+Λgab=κETabtot, with Ttot=TEM+Tφ, TabEM=μ0−1(FacFbc−14gabFcdFcd), κE=8πGN/c4, and Gab=Ric⁡ab−12Rgab.

[L1]

Local evolution of the adopted classical charged scalar model: on a classical model solution, Pa=Daφ and Eφ=DaPa−V′(∣φ∣2)φ, ja=KφλIm⁡(φ‾Pa), and Tabφ=KφRe⁡(Pa‾Pb)−Kφ2gab(gcdPc‾Pd+V(∣φ∣2)). It defines κE=8πGN/c4, TabEM=μ0−1(FacFbc−14gabFcdFcd), and Gab=Ric⁡ab−12Rgab under the stated SI length-coordinate and Lorentzian conventions. The current authored mathematical supplier uses the same charged compatibility in both local branches, with its stated choice, admissibility and constraint hypotheses. The physical conclusion remains conditional on the adopted model.

[F2]

Gronwall's integral inequality with variable and constant coefficients: a nonnegative local energy with zero initial value and an inequality E(t)≤C∫0tE(s) ds is zero; the same holds after time reversal.

Verification

technique · substitute the zero scalar field into the exact model equations and compare the resulting sources with the displayed source-free Einstein–Maxwell equations
1.1A1L1givenalgebra

Since φ≡0, every derivative of φ is zero and Pa=Daφ=0. Hence Eφ=DaPa−V′(0)φ=0 and ja=KφλIm⁡(φ‾Pa)=0. Also gabPa‾Pb+V(∣φ∣2)=V(0)=0, so the defining formula gives Tabφ=0.

2.1F1L1step 1.1algebra

Substitution of j=0 and Tφ=0 into [F1] leaves exactly ∇aFab=0, dF=0, and Gab+Λgab=κETabEM, the displayed assumptions. Thus the zero extension solves the full classical model. For compatible zero-scalar Cauchy data, [L1] supplies a local development. In its temporal gauge, ∂0=n initially, so π0=πn=0 there; the charged spatial compatibility gives πi=Diφ0=0 as well. Hence the real scalar state z=(Re⁡φ,Im⁡φ,Re⁡π0,Im⁡π0,Re⁡πi,Im⁡πi) has zero initial data.

3.1F2L1step 2.1algebra∎

In the admissible coordinates, the scalar first-order equations have ∂0φ=π0 and the π-block Aπ0∂0π+∑kAπk∂kπ+zero-order terms=0, where Aπ0=(−g0000(gij)),Aπk=(−2g0k−gkj−gik0). These are real symmetric matrices, with Aπ0 positive definite because g00<0 and (gij) is positive definite. Adding the scalar transport equation gives symmetric matrices A0=I⊕Aπ0 and Ak=0⊕Aπk on the real state z, so the full scalar system is A0∂0z+∑kAk∂kz+C0z=0. The remaining terms can be written C0z with C0 bounded on each compact solution cylinder: they are linear in φ,π0,πi, with coefficients formed from Γ(g), Ai, F0i and V′(∣φ∣2). The metric and matter regularity in [L1] gives g∈C3 and A,φ∈C2 in the finite-Sobolev branch at s≥5; hence A0,Ak are continuously differentiable and C0 is continuous there. Writing e=zTA0z and fk=zTAkz, symmetry and the system equation give ∂0e+∑k∂kfk=zT(∂0A0+∑k∂kAk−C0−C0T)z. The matrix on the right is bounded, while A0≥aI for some a>0 on the compact cylinder. On the periodic torus, integrating this identity gives E′≤CE for E=∫e, since the spatial fluxes cancel at opposite periodic faces. In a local chart, choose a coordinate cube Q0 around the initial point and shrink each side at a speed σ satisfying σa>max⁡ksup⁡∥Ak∥. Differentiating the integral over the moving cube and integrating each spatial derivative by the one-variable fundamental theorem of calculus gives E′(t)≤CE(t)−∑faces S∫SzT(σA0+νkAk)z dS≤CE(t), where ν=±∂k is the outward coordinate normal on each face; the face matrices are positive definite by the choice of σ. In either domain E(0)=0 and E≥0, so integrating the inequality and applying [F2] gives E=0 forward and backward in time. Positivity of A0 and continuity of z then give φ=π=0 near every initial point. This proves the zero branch for finite-Sobolev data without using smooth geometric uniqueness; for smooth data, [L1] additionally identifies the branch up to its stated isometry and gauge.

Sources