How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Waveguides and cavities — Examples
1 · Prerequisites
- Absolute and Conditional Convergence; Rearrangement; Products
- Analyticity of Holomorphic Functions; Liouville and Morera
- Arc Length and Rectifiable Curves
- Areas of Elementary Plane Figures
- Banach-Space Differential Calculus and Banach Manifolds
- Binary Operations, Monoids, Groups and Subgroups
- Bounded Linear Operators and Quotient Spaces
- Bounded Variation and the Riemann–Stieltjes Integral
- Compactness
- Compactness in Metric Spaces
- Completeness, Completion, and Uniform Continuity
- Complex Differentiability and the Cauchy–Riemann Equations
- Complex Lp Spaces and Test-Function Conventions
- Complex Power Series and Analytic Functions
- Connectedness
- Construction of the Natural Numbers
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Cauchy Sequences
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Dedekind Cuts
- Continuity, IVT, EVT, and Uniform Continuity
- Contour Integration
- Cosets, Index and Lagrange's Theorem
- Countability and Uncountability
- Countability Axioms and Cardinal Functions
- Density Separability and Convolution in Lᵖ
- Determinants of Matrices over a Commutative Ring
- Distributions Test Functions and Differentiation
- Divisibility, Euclidean Domains, Principal Ideal Domains and Unique Factorisation
- Dual Spaces, Bilinear and Quadratic Forms, and Sylvester's Law of Inertia
- Em Elementary Mathematical Prerequisites
- Euclidean Surface Measure, Divergence, and Green Identities
- Exterior Powers, Orientation and Hodge Duality
- Filters and Ultrafilters
- Finite Counting, Factorials and Binomial Coefficients
- Finite Dimensional Normed Spaces and Riesz Lemma
- Foundations of the Real Numbers for Analysis
- Fourier Transform Convolution and Approximate Identities
- Free Modules, Exact Sequences, Projective and Injective Modules
- Fubini and Change of Variables
- Function Space Topologies and the Exponential Law
- Fundamental Trigonometric Identities
- Gaussian Elimination, Elementary Matrices and Reduced Row Echelon Form
- Goursat's Theorem and Cauchy's Theorem in a Convex Domain
- Group Actions, Orbits, Stabilisers and Cayley's Theorem
- Group Homomorphisms and the Isomorphism Theorems
- Harmonic Functions and the Poisson Integral
- Hausdorff via the Diagonal
- Hereditary and Productive Behaviour of the Separation Axioms
- Ideals, Quotient Rings and the Isomorphism Theorems for Rings
- Improper Integrals
- Inner Product Spaces, Gram-Schmidt, Projections and Adjoints
- Integral Maxwell and constraints
- Lebesgue Measure on Euclidean Space
- Limits of Real Functions
- limsup, liminf, and Subsequential Limits
- Line Integrals and the Gradient Theorem
- Linear Independence, Bases and Dimension
- Linear Transformations, Rank-Nullity and Quotient Spaces
- Lorentz Transformations
- Manifolds with Boundary Collars and Orientations
- Material response and stationary interfaces
- Matrices, the Matrix of a Linear Map, and Change of Basis
- Maximum Principles Harnack and Liouville in Rn
- Measurable Functions and Simple Approximation
- Measures and Their Basic Properties
- Metric Spaces
- Mixed Partials, Taylor Formulae, and Extrema
- Modes of Convergence Egorov and Lusin
- Modules, Submodules, Quotient Modules and the Isomorphism Theorems
- Monotone Functions, Discontinuities, and Continuity Sets
- Monotone Sequences, Bolzano-Weierstrass, and Cauchy Completeness
- Normal Subgroups and Quotient Groups
- Normed and Banach Spaces
- Norming and Separation under Hahn–Banach
- Order, Zorn's Lemma, and the Axiom of Choice
- Outer Measure and the Caratheodory Extension Theorem
- Partitions of Unity and Paracompactness
- pi: the Equivalent Characterizations
- Polynomial Rings, the Division Algorithm and Roots
- Power Series and Real-Analytic Functions
- Primitives and postulates
- Product Measures and the Fubini Tonelli Theorems
- Properties of the Integral and the Working FTC
- Radon Measures and the Riesz Markov Kakutani Theorem
- Rank Theorems and Embedded Submanifolds
- Regular Surfaces and Surface Integrals
- Relations, Functions, and Quotients
- Rings, Subrings, Integral Domains and Fields
- Rⁿ as a Normed Space; Vector-Valued Functions
- Roots, Rational Powers, and Classical Inequalities
- Sard Theorem and Transversality
- Schwartz Space and the Plancherel Theorem
- Separation Axioms: the Hierarchy
- Sequences and Limits
- Sequences and Series of Functions; Uniform Convergence
- Series: Convergence and the Nonnegative Tests
- Sigma Algebras and Borel Sets
- Simple Field Extensions and the Construction of the Complex Numbers
- Sine, Cosine, and the Definition of Pi
- Smooth Approximation and Sobolev Extension
- Smooth Manifolds and Smooth Maps
- Smooth Partitions of Unity and Exhaustions
- Spacetime Primitives
- Subspaces, Products, and Quotients
- Suprema and Infima
- Symmetric Groups, Cycle Decomposition and the Sign Homomorphism
- Tangent Cotangent and the Differential
- Tensor Fields Exterior Algebra and Differential Forms
- Tensor Products of Modules
- The Cantor Set, Baire Category, and Measure Zero in ℝ
- The Complex Exponential and Euler's Formula
- The Derivative and the Mean Value Theorems
- The Determinant of a Linear Operator, Cofactors and Cramer's Rule
- The Direct Method and Euler--Lagrange Equations
- The Divergence Theorem and Classical Stokes
- The Exponential Function
- The Fundamental Theorems of Calculus
- The Identity Theorem, the Maximum Principle and the Open Mapping Theorem
- The Inverse and Implicit Function Theorems
- The Inverse Function Theorem Completed
- The Lebesgue and Riemann Integrals Compared
- The Lebesgue Integral and the Convergence Theorems
- The Logarithm and General Powers
- The Lᵖ Spaces Holder Minkowski and Riesz Fischer
- The Maximal Function and Lebesgue Differentiation
- The Riemann Integral in Rᵐ and Jordan Content
- The Riemann Integral: Definition and Integrability
- The Topology of Euclidean Space
- The Total Derivative in ℝᵐ → ℝⁿ
- The Winding Number and the Global Cauchy Theorem
- The ZFC Axioms and the Basic Set Constructions
- Topological Spaces and Continuity
- Topology of ℝ
- Triangularisation, Generalised Eigenspaces and Jordan Canonical Form
- Vector Spaces, Linear Subspaces, Span and Direct Sums
- Volumes of Elementary Solids and Solids of Revolution
- Waveguides and cavities
- Weak Derivatives and Sobolev Spaces
- Worldlines And Clocks
2 · Summary
Objective. The companion collects the three leaf examples of the pair: the TE instance of the rectangular candidate theorem, the resonant rectangular-cavity standing mode, and the TEM potential-form topology with the single-conductor obstruction and the coaxial annulus.
The TE candidate. The example The TE10 candidate of a lossless rectangular guide: explicit fields, cutoff and propagating branch instantiates the TE family at , with and all displayed quantities read as coherent SI numerical values, giving the numerical amplitudes , , the half-sine standing profile with its traveling wave, the cutoff with the real, cutoff and evanescent alternatives, and, for , the lowest-cutoff comparison over all TE/TM candidates of The separated TE and TM candidate modes of the lossless rectangular PEC guide: exact verification, index restrictions and cutoff, with the tie at and the excluded index .
A rectangular-cavity standing mode. The example A rectangular-cavity standing mode at resonance: explicit fields and the PEC end-cap check verifies the standing fields and with in coherent SI numerical values with : it computes the divergence, Laplacian and double curl of the profile, finds the exact resonance , checks all six wall conditions including the -end caps, and identifies the field as the cutoff TM instance with axis .
TEM topology and the coaxial line. The example TEM modes of a coaxial guide and the single-conductor obstruction for harmonic transverse potentials works in the harmonic-potential form: it constructs the TEM fields from a plane harmonic potential, proves that the PEC condition on a smooth wall is equivalent to the vanishing tangential potential derivative, classifies an arbitrary TEM phasor by or the zero field, and shows by two-dimensional Dirichlet uniqueness that a single-conductor cross-section with connected boundary admits no nonzero potential-form TEM field (with the rectangular class handled by the continuous-closure radial primitive). The coaxial annulus is then computed explicitly: the fields satisfy the source-free lossless equations and the PEC conditions, the branch is nondispersive with no cutoff, and the polar integrals give with , and . Countable Choice is confined to the polar-measure energy computation, and no lossy, radiation, signal-speed or empirical claim is made.
3 · Logical flowchart
4 · Definitions, postulates, theorems and proofs
None yet.
5 · Examples, experiments and counterexamples
The TE10 candidate of a lossless rectangular guide: explicit fields, cutoff and propagating branch
The explicit TE10 candidate mode of the lossless rectangular guide in the lossless isotropic scalar branch, with its polarization, standing profile, cutoff and propagating/evanescent branches. Conditional on the adopted model; no measurement or empirical claim.
Example
Every displayed component and parameter below is its real or complex numerical value in fixed coherent SI units: lengths in m, time in s, in , in , in , in , in and in . The physical longitudinal normalization is in The separated TE and TM candidate modes of the lossless rectangular PEC guide: exact verification, index restrictions and cutoff(a), whose numerical value is one.
Let , , , with , and put , . In the rectangular guide of Rectangular PEC guide and cavity geometry, the zero-normal-B reflection class, and axis-relative TE/TM/TEM with cross-section , take the TE candidate of The separated TE and TM candidate modes of the lossless rectangular PEC guide: exact verification, index restrictions and cutoff(a) with , whose amplitudes are Then the real fields , are smooth, have (TE) with linearly polarized along , satisfy the source-free lossless macroscopic equations and the PEC wall conditions, and carry a half-sine standing profile in with a traveling wave in . The cutoff of this mode is : real nonzero exists exactly for , at the mode is at cutoff (), and for it is evanescent. If , then is the lowest cutoff among all TE and TM candidates of the cited theorem (attained also by when ); the case is not a mode by the index restriction of the theorem. This is an explicit conditional candidate of the adopted model; it asserts no measurement and no completeness.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The SI numerical-value convention and normalization of the Example; constants , , , with , and ; the rectangular guide of Rectangular PEC guide and cavity geometry, the zero-normal-B reflection class, and axis-relative TE/TM/TEM with cross-section and the SI conventions of Framework-local SI units, the vacuum constants and the exact/measured status of their values.
With the SI numerical-value convention and , the TE candidate theorem The separated TE and TM candidate modes of the lossless rectangular PEC guide: exact verification, index restrictions and cutoff (a): for indices with and , and with , the amplitudes , give smooth real fields , that are TE, satisfy the four source-free lossless macroscopic equations and the PEC wall conditions, and whose cutoff is with the alternatives of clause (d); clause (c) excludes .
The profile identities of The separated sine and cosine rectangle profiles: eigen-identities, boundary traces, orthogonality and Dirichlet integrals for : , , , at and at .
Verification
[Instantiation] With one has , and by [F2] and the coordinate formula for the cross product, so the amplitudes of [F1] become and , exactly as displayed. The theorem supplies smoothness, the four source-free equations, the TE property and the PEC wall conditions, and the first component shows that is polarized along ; the real fields are and , so the transverse factor is a fixed half-sine standing profile and the phase is a traveling wave in .
[Cutoff and propagation alternatives] Applying clause (d) of [F1] with gives : real longitudinal wave numbers with exist exactly for , with exactly for and at ; for the two algebraic roots are and the same verified fields carry the factor , so the mode is evanescent.
[Lowest cutoff for ] Let be any TE index pair and let . If then ; if then and because . Hence , with equality possible only for , or for when ; since the cutoff is increasing in , the cutoff of the candidate is the lowest cutoff of all TE indices. Every TM index has by [F1], so its and its cutoff is strictly larger; and is not a mode by the index restriction of [F1]. Thus is the lowest cutoff among those TE/TM candidates, attained also by at .
[Scope] The displayed fields are an explicit conditional candidate of the adopted lossless model, with the stated cutoff and lower-bound comparison; the quantities are declared model parameters, no measurement, resonance observation, completeness or uniqueness is asserted, and no empirical premise is used.
A rectangular-cavity standing mode at resonance: explicit fields and the PEC end-cap check
An explicit conditional standing-wave cavity mode of the lossless isotropic scalar branch in the rectangular perfectly conducting cavity, with its exact resonance condition and end-cap check. No measured resonance or empirical claim.
Example
All displayed fields and parameters below are numerical values in fixed coherent SI units: in m, in s, in , in , in , in and in T. The TM longitudinal normalization is in The separated TE and TM candidate modes of the lossless rectangular PEC guide: exact verification, index restrictions and cutoff(b), so the dimensionless profile below specifies the numerical electric-field components.
Let and be constants, put , and for define and , where the curl is the fixed-time spatial curl of Divergence and curl of a vector field. Then are smooth, , , and satisfy the four source-free macroscopic equations on the box in the lossless isotropic scalar branch exactly when with that resonance, and hold on all six walls, so is a PEC cavity mode. It is the cutoff instance of the TM family of The separated TE and TM candidate modes of the lossless rectangular PEC guide: exact verification, index restrictions and cutoff(b) taken with axis , cross-section and indices : the field is independent of , which is why it also satisfies the and end-cap conditions for every box length . The example asserts a conditional model solution, not an observed resonance.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The SI numerical-value convention and normalization of the Example; constants and ; ; for the fields and on the box ; the fixed-time spatial curl and divergence of Divergence and curl of a vector field; the box geometry, its six open walls and the PEC conditions of Rectangular PEC guide and cavity geometry, the zero-normal-B reflection class, and axis-relative TE/TM/TEM.
Profile identities: with on the rectangle one has with , on the rectangle boundary; in particular and the second derivatives of the sine factors are and (The separated sine and cosine rectangle profiles: eigen-identities, boundary traces, orthogonality and Dirichlet integrals (b)).
Use the positively oriented cyclic coordinates with basis : cyclic permutation leaves the coordinate cross-product, divergence and curl formulas unchanged. Thus the transverse lemma and candidate theorem apply with longitudinal axis and transverse coordinates . For an -independent profile regarded on the splitting with coordinates , , , and for transverse (Transverse vector-calculus identities for the splitting (a),(b) applied with ).
With the stated SI numerical-value convention and , the TM family of The separated TE and TM candidate modes of the lossless rectangular PEC guide: exact verification, index restrictions and cutoff (b) with axis , cross-section , indices and : , and the amplitudes , at become and ; the theorem gives smoothness, the four source-free equations at the cutoff , and the PEC conditions on the four faces with normals (The separated TE and TM candidate modes of the lossless rectangular PEC guide: exact verification, index restrictions and cutoff (b),(d)).
Verification
[The spatial profile, the equations and the resonance] The profile has only its first component, independent of , so and by [F1]. Hence and (a divergence of a curl vanishes componentwise by the equality of mixed partials of the smooth profile). Further and , so Faraday's law holds identically. For Amp`ere's law compute : by [F2] , whose curl is by [F1]; therefore and , which agree exactly when , i.e. when . The fields are smooth because is a product of sines and a finite combination of such products, and both are independent of .
[The six wall conditions] On the walls and with normals : since is parallel to , and because . On the walls and with normals : and vanishes because there, so ; and with , which vanishes at . On the walls and with normals : , whose coefficient vanishes because there, so ; and with , which vanishes at . Thus all six walls satisfy and at resonance.
[Identification with the cutoff TM instance] In the setting of [F3] with axis , cross-section , indices and , the dispersion relation at is exactly the resonance of step 1.1, , and the amplitudes become and . Then , , and because [F2] and at resonance. The amplitudes are independent of , which is why the end-cap conditions on hold for every box length ; the theorem's clause (d) supplies the resonance condition and clause (b) the guide-wall conditions on the four faces with normals .
[Scope] The displayed pair is an explicit conditional standing-wave mode of the lossless isotropic scalar branch in the rectangular perfectly conducting cavity, with the exact resonance condition and the full wall check, identified as the cutoff TM instance with axis ; the example asserts a model solution and not an observed resonance, and no measurement, completeness or empirical claim is made.
TEM modes of a coaxial guide and the single-conductor obstruction for harmonic transverse potentials
The explicit coaxial TEM candidate of the lossless isotropic scalar branch with its per-length capacitance and inductance, and the obstruction showing that a single-conductor cross-section with connected boundary admits no nonzero TEM field in the harmonic-potential form. Includes complex potentials, both propagation signs, the zero-field label case and the star-shaped interior reduction with explicit boundary traces; no general simply connected reduction, lossy or empirical claim.
Example
Assume the lossless isotropic scalar constant branch of Declared material-closure branches: linear nondispersive Ohmic response and the causal memory branch, the macroscopic equations of The macroscopic Maxwell equations in terms of D, H and the free sources with , , and the straight-guide, TEM and separated-phasor conventions of Rectangular PEC guide and cavity geometry, the zero-normal-B reflection class, and axis-relative TE/TM/TEM; put and . (a) [Potential form] Let be a bounded connected domain and let (with real-valued potentials included) satisfy on (the plane Laplacian of The Laplacian of a function and of a vector field; a function with is called harmonic). For either sign define , and ; then the separated real fields , satisfy the source-free lossless macroscopic equations with (TEM), and the PEC condition on a smooth wall with unit normal is equivalent to along that boundary curve, so that is constant on each connected component of . Moreover, if is star-shaped (Star-shaped open subsets of Euclidean space), every separated TEM phasor with transverse amplitudes has on the interior a complex harmonic potential , obtained by applying On a star-shaped open domain, closed, exact, conservative, path-independent, and zero-loop are equivalent to the real and imaginary electric amplitudes separately. If the field is nonzero, the equations force , hence , and , giving the two displayed signs. If the field is zero, solves the equations for every longitudinal label , with no dispersion conclusion. The boundary potential description requires the stated continuous differentiable boundary trace (in particular the initial potential has it); the interior exactness supplier alone is not asserted to produce a real potential or automatic boundary extension. (b) [Single-conductor obstruction] If in the potential-form setting is connected, then is constant on , hence is constant on by the two-dimensional classical Dirichlet uniqueness Uniqueness for the classical dirichlet problem, applied to its real and imaginary parts with their respective constants as second solutions, and therefore : a single-conductor cross-section with connected boundary admits no nonzero TEM field in the potential form. The same potential-form obstruction applies to a rectangular cross-section with a potential in having constant boundary trace, because this uniqueness supplier does not require a boundary. For rectangular separated TEM amplitudes that are on the interior and continuous on the closure with the classical PEC traces on open edges, the star-centre radial primitive extends continuously to the rectangle closure. The edgewise tangential derivative is the electric trace, so PEC makes the potential constant on each open edge and continuity joins those constants at the corners. Thus this stated rectangular class has no nonzero TEM field. (c) [Coaxial example] For the following Lebesgue polar-coordinate energy calculation assume Countable Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()). Let , (two boundary components), fix , choose the forward label , and define , so that with and with . Then on : indeed by The natural logarithm has derivative 1/x and equals the integral from 1 to x of 1/t and the chain rule (The chain rule for total derivatives: ), and the second partial derivatives sum to zero; hence is constant on each boundary circle (values at and at ), the fields satisfy the source-free lossless macroscopic equations and the PEC conditions, and the relation is nondispersive with no cutoff. The amplitude integrals computed in polar coordinates with Polar coordinates decompose Lebesgue measure into r^{n-1} dr d sigma (the Jacobian factor is read from that formula) are the instantaneous per-length energies are and with ; equivalently, with the per-length inductance in , per-length capacitance in , and wall-circulation amplitude in (identified with the inner-conductor sheet-current amplitude when its conductor-side magnetic intensity trace is zero) one has and . For the two boundary components carry distinct constants, allowing a nonzero field; gives equal constants and the zero field. (d) [Scope] The obstruction clause (b) is proved for the continuous-boundary harmonic-potential form. The star-shaped interior classification in (a) covers both signs and the zero field, with boundary conclusions under the stated potential-trace hypotheses; the general reduction of an arbitrary TEM field to the potential form on a merely simply connected non-star-shaped cross-section is not asserted here. The coaxial clause is an explicit conditional computation in the declared model with no empirical content; no lossy, radiation or signal-speed claim is made.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The lossless isotropic scalar constant branch of Declared material-closure branches: linear nondispersive Ohmic response and the causal memory branch with constants and relations , ; the macroscopic equations of The macroscopic Maxwell equations in terms of D, H and the free sources with , ; the straight-guide, TEM and separated-phasor conventions of Rectangular PEC guide and cavity geometry, the zero-normal-B reflection class, and axis-relative TE/TM/TEM; and ; a bounded connected domain and, in the star-shaped clause, a star-shaped such ; a potential with on (the plane Laplacian of The Laplacian of a function and of a vector field, a function with being harmonic); for the coaxial clause , , real , and Countable Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()).
The declared real fields satisfy the source-free equations of [F1] of the theorem page exactly when their complex amplitudes satisfy , , , , where and (Calculus of separated phasor fields: real-part derivative identities and amplitude injectivity, The macroscopic Maxwell equations in terms of D, H and the free sources clause (b), Declared material-closure branches: linear nondispersive Ohmic response and the causal memory branch clause (b)); a nonzero separated real field has nonzero amplitude, and a separated real field vanishes identically exactly when its amplitude does (Calculus of separated phasor fields: real-part derivative identities and amplitude injectivity clause (d)).
Transverse vector identities: for a transverse vector , , is transverse and ; and for (Transverse vector-calculus identities for the splitting (a), (c)). Cross-product and scalar-triple-product manipulations are those of The cross product in and The cross product is bilinear, alternating, and orthogonal to both factors: and .
Plane harmonic components are smooth, indeed real analytic, in the interior (Plane harmonic functions are smooth and real analytic); a function on an open subset of has equal mixed partials (Clairaut--Schwarz theorem for continuous second partial derivatives).
Classical Dirichlet uniqueness: if , , is bounded, nonempty and open and satisfy in and on , then on ; the statement requires no regularity of the boundary (Uniqueness for the classical dirichlet problem).
On an open star-shaped , a field is closed exactly when it is exact, and exactness uses a potential (On a star-shaped open domain, closed, exact, conservative, path-independent, and zero-loop are equivalent, Star-shaped open subsets of Euclidean space).
One-variable and measure tools: for a differentiable function on an interval a vanishing derivative makes it constant, and for with integrable derivative (The second fundamental theorem: if is differentiable on with and is integrable, then ); and for (The natural logarithm has derivative 1/x and equals the integral from 1 to x of 1/t); composites obey the chain rule (The chain rule for total derivatives: ); the polar-coordinate formula integrates continuous functions on the annulus with Jacobian factor (Polar coordinates decompose Lebesgue measure into r^{n-1} dr d sigma, A C^1 diffeomorphism satisfies the change-of-variables formula for L^1 functions), the omitted radial segment being Lebesgue null (A box with a degenerate side is Lebesgue null, and so is every coordinate hyperplane in ); positive square roots exist and are unique (Square roots exist: a unique with ; the positives are ).
In the lossless branch the stored-energy density and flux are those of Energy balance and Ohmic dissipation for the constant nondispersive linear model; only its local positive reading is used.
Verification
[Potential form and the PEC boundary equivalence] Let with , fix , and put , , , with real fields , . Then and because and are transverse [F2], so (TEM); and the four amplitude equations of [F1] hold: ; because has equal mixed partials [F3]; , using , which holds because since ; and , hence by [F2] and because . Hence the real fields satisfy the source-free lossless macroscopic equations by [F1]. If the potential has a differentiable boundary trace on a smooth wall of with outward unit normal (an in-plane unit vector) and tangent , then and, since , , so (only the vanishing of this normal-cross field is used below); likewise by the scalar triple product and [F2]. Since a separated real field vanishes identically exactly when its amplitude does [F1], the PEC conditions and hold exactly when along the wall. In a boundary parametrization the derivative of the potential trace is the parametrization speed times (up to orientation); the chain rule and FTC [F6] therefore make it locally constant when PEC is imposed. A locally constant function on a connected boundary component is constant there, since any one of its value fibres and its complement are both relatively open.
[Converse classification and the star-shaped potential] Let be transverse amplitudes of a separated TEM field satisfying the four amplitude equations of [F1]. The third components of the two curl equations read and , while the two divergence equations read and (the -terms vanish with the third components). The transverse part of Faraday reads in its third component and in its transverse components, so and, since , with no division by . Substituting into the transverse part of Ampere and using [F2] gives , that is . If then , so by [F6]; if then Faraday gives , and the zero field solves the equations for every longitudinal label with no dispersion conclusion. Finally, if is star-shaped and is a transverse closed field (), then its real and imaginary parts are closed fields on the star-shaped domain, so [F5] supplies potentials for each, hence a complex with after a sign change, and makes ; no real-only or boundary-extension conclusion is inferred from interior exactness.
[Single-conductor obstruction] Suppose is harmonic on the bounded connected domain and has constant boundary trace on each connected component of , with the PEC potential description of step 1.1 available. If is connected, the trace is a single constant , and applying [F4] to the real and imaginary parts of and of the constant function gives on ; then and . For a rectangular cross-section with a potential in having constant boundary trace the same argument applies, because [F4] requires only a bounded nonempty open set and no boundary regularity. For rectangular separated TEM amplitudes that are on the interior and continuous on the closure with the classical PEC traces on the open edges, fix a star centre and use the radial primitive furnished by [F5]. It is on the interior with ; the displayed formula extends continuously to the closure by uniform continuity of the electric amplitude there. For two points on one open edge, apply the interior FTC line-integral identity on parallel interior segments and pass to the edge using this continuity. Thus the boundary potential increment is the integral of the continuous tangential electric trace, whose difference quotients give the edge derivative; PEC makes that derivative zero; by the one-variable constancy of [F6] the potential is constant on each open edge, and continuity at the corners joins those constants, so the trace is constant on and [F4] gives constant, hence and . Thus a single-conductor cross-section with connected boundary admits no nonzero TEM field in the stated potential form, and the same holds for the stated rectangular class.
[Coaxial annulus: potential and fields] In the annulus put and choose the forward label (so ). Since by [F6] and the chain rule, and , so on ; also on and on , so the trace is constant on each boundary circle. The constructed fields of step 1.1 are then with , and with ; by step 1.1 they satisfy the source-free lossless macroscopic equations and the PEC conditions, and the longitudinal label satisfies , nondispersive with no cutoff, so is real and nonzero for every .
[Coaxial energies in polar coordinates] Assume . With and , the polar formula of [F6] (Jacobian ; the omitted radial segment is null) and give , using by [F6]. Hence with , and because . For the sheet-current reading additionally assume zero conductor-side magnetic intensity trace. On the inner wall the filling normal is , so Rectangular PEC guide and cavity geometry, the zero-normal-B reflection class, and axis-relative TE/TM/TEM(b) gives . Without that additional trace assumption the following is only the filling-side wall circulation. Integrating that axial circulation around the circle gives . With one gets , and . The instantaneous per-length energies are and with , by the definitions of and and the identity ; for all fields and energies vanish. For the two boundary components carry distinct constants and , whereas gives the zero field with equal boundary constants; this respects the obstruction of step 2.1.
[Scope] Clause (a) is steps 1.1 and 1.2: the potential form gives TEM fields satisfying the equations and turns PEC on a smooth wall into the vanishing tangential potential derivative, the converse classification gives the two nonzero signs and the unrestricted label for the zero field, and the star-shaped interior exactness is used only with the stated potential-trace hypotheses for boundary conclusions. Clause (b) is step 2.1, proved for the continuous-boundary harmonic-potential form and the stated rectangular class; the general reduction of an arbitrary TEM field to the potential form on a merely simply connected non-star-shaped cross-section is not asserted. Clause (c) is steps 2.2 and 3.1: the coaxial computation is conditional, in the declared lossless model, with the polar-measure branch the only place Countable Choice is used, and no lossy, radiation, empirical or signal-speed claim is made.
Sources
- N. Beisert, Elektrodynamik, Vorlesungsskript, ETH Zurich, 2024 FS (German), Chapter 13 'Wellenleiter' and 'Kavitaeten', PDF pp. 153-162 (printed pp. 13.1-13.10); complete 176-page author-hosted PDF and official TeX read, with the conjugate-error in (13.26), the 'Wendepunkt' mislabel and the general group-velocity restriction recorded as source defects not copied
- R. Fitzpatrick, Classical Electromagnetism: An intermediate level course (University of Texas at Austin, 2006-02-02), node 105 'Wave-guides', complete author-hosted HTML node read in the run's pinned full-notes snapshot
- D. J. Griffiths, Introduction to Electrodynamics, 3rd edition (Prentice Hall 1999, 596-page full scan), sections 9.5.1-9.5.3 printed pp. 405-412 (wave guides, TE waves in a rectangular wave guide, coaxial transmission line), read in the stamped full text; OCR noise cross-checked against the other treatments
- D. Tong, Electromagnetism, University of Cambridge Part II Mathematical Tripos lecture notes (2026 printing, 236 pp.), section 4.3.3 'An Application: Reflection off a Conductor' printed pp. 89-90 (ideal-conductor boundary reading: E=0 inside, tangential E continuity and n.B=0, surface current), read in the stamped full PDF