Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Waveguides and cavities — Examples

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

Objective. The companion collects the three leaf examples of the pair: the TE10 instance of the rectangular candidate theorem, the resonant rectangular-cavity standing mode, and the TEM potential-form topology with the single-conductor obstruction and the coaxial annulus.

The TE10 candidate. The example The TE10 candidate of a lossless rectangular guide: explicit fields, cutoff and propagating branch instantiates the TE family at (m,n)=(1,0), with H∗=1 A m−1 and all displayed quantities read as coherent SI numerical values, giving the numerical amplitudes E~=(0,iωμaπsin⁡πx1a,0), H~=(−iβaπsin⁡πx1a,0,cos⁡πx1a), the half-sine standing profile with its traveling wave, the cutoff ωc=π/(aεμ) with the real, cutoff and evanescent alternatives, and, for a≥b, the lowest-cutoff comparison over all TE/TM candidates of The separated TE and TM candidate modes of the lossless rectangular PEC guide: exact verification, index restrictions and cutoff, with the tie at a=b and the excluded index (0,0).

A rectangular-cavity standing mode. The example A rectangular-cavity standing mode at resonance: explicit fields and the PEC end-cap check verifies the standing fields E=Espcos⁡ωt and B=−1ωcurl⁡Espsin⁡ωt with Esp=e1sin⁡πx2bsin⁡πx3d in coherent SI numerical values with E∗=1 V m−1: it computes the divergence, Laplacian and double curl of the profile, finds the exact resonance ω2=(εμ)−1[(π/b)2+(π/d)2], checks all six wall conditions including the x1-end caps, and identifies the field as the cutoff β=0 TM(1,1) instance with axis e1.

TEM topology and the coaxial line. The example TEM modes of a coaxial guide and the single-conductor obstruction for harmonic transverse potentials works in the harmonic-potential form: it constructs the TEM fields from a plane harmonic potential, proves that the PEC condition on a smooth wall is equivalent to the vanishing tangential potential derivative, classifies an arbitrary C1 TEM phasor by β2=εμω2 or the zero field, and shows by two-dimensional Dirichlet uniqueness that a single-conductor cross-section with connected boundary admits no nonzero potential-form TEM field (with the rectangular class handled by the continuous-closure radial primitive). The coaxial annulus φ=Vln⁡(b/∣x∣)/ln⁡(b/a) is then computed explicitly: the fields satisfy the source-free lossless equations and the PEC conditions, the branch is nondispersive with no cutoff, and the polar integrals give We=Wm=12CV2 with C=2πε/ln⁡(b/a), L=μln⁡(b/a)/(2π) and LC=εμ. Countable Choice is confined to the polar-measure energy computation, and no lossy, radiation, signal-speed or empirical claim is made.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, postulates, theorems and proofs

None yet.

5 · Examples, experiments and counterexamples

ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passOpen item page →

The TE10 candidate of a lossless rectangular guide: explicit fields, cutoff and propagating branch

Physical scope

The explicit TE10 candidate mode of the lossless rectangular guide in the lossless isotropic scalar branch, with its polarization, standing profile, cutoff and propagating/evanescent branches. Conditional on the adopted model; no measurement or empirical claim.

Example

Every displayed component and parameter below is its real or complex numerical value in fixed coherent SI units: lengths in m, time in s, ω in s−1, β in m−1, ε in F m−1, μ in H m−1, E,E~ in V m−1 and H,H~ in A m−1. The physical longitudinal normalization is H∗=1 A m−1 in The separated TE and TM candidate modes of the lossless rectangular PEC guide: exact verification, index restrictions and cutoff(a), whose numerical value is one.

Let ε,μ>0, a,b>0, ω>0, β>0 with β2=ω2εμ−(π/a)2>0, and put ωc:=π/(aεμ), θ:=βx3−ωt. In the rectangular guide of Rectangular PEC guide and cavity geometry, the zero-normal-B reflection class, and axis-relative TE/TM/TEM with cross-section (0,a)×(0,b), take the TE candidate of The separated TE and TM candidate modes of the lossless rectangular PEC guide: exact verification, index restrictions and cutoff(a) with (m,n)=(1,0), whose amplitudes are E~=(0, iωμaπsin⁡πx1a, 0),H~=(−iβaπsin⁡πx1a, 0, cos⁡πx1a). Then the real fields E=Re⁡(E~eiθ), B=μRe⁡(H~eiθ) are smooth, have Ez=0 (TE) with E linearly polarized along e2, satisfy the source-free lossless macroscopic equations and the PEC wall conditions, and carry a half-sine standing profile sin⁡(πx1/a) in x1 with a traveling wave in x3. The cutoff of this mode is ωc=π/(aεμ): real nonzero β exists exactly for ω>ωc, at ω=ωc the mode is at cutoff (β=0), and for ω<ωc it is evanescent. If a≥b, then ωc=π/(aεμ) is the lowest cutoff among all TE and TM candidates of the cited theorem (attained also by (m,n)=(0,1) when a=b); the case (m,n)=(0,0) is not a mode by the index restriction of the theorem. This is an explicit conditional candidate of the adopted model; it asserts no measurement and no completeness.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The SI numerical-value convention and normalization H∗=1 A m−1 of the Example; constants ε,μ>0, a,b>0, ω>0, β>0 with β2=ω2εμ−(π/a)2>0, ωc:=π/(aεμ) and θ:=βx3−ωt; the rectangular guide of Rectangular PEC guide and cavity geometry, the zero-normal-B reflection class, and axis-relative TE/TM/TEM with cross-section (0,a)×(0,b) and the SI conventions of Framework-local SI units, the vacuum constants and the exact/measured status of their values.

[F1]

With the SI numerical-value convention and H∗=1 A m−1, the TE candidate theorem The separated TE and TM candidate modes of the lossless rectangular PEC guide: exact verification, index restrictions and cutoff (a): for indices (m,n)≠(0,0) with hmn=cos⁡mπx1acos⁡nπx2b and kmn2=(mπa)2+(nπb)2, and with β2=ω2εμ−kmn2, the amplitudes E~=−iωμkmn2ez×∇thmn, H~=iβkmn2∇thmn+ezhmn give smooth real fields E=Re⁡(E~eiθ), B=μRe⁡(H~eiθ) that are TE, satisfy the four source-free lossless macroscopic equations and the PEC wall conditions, and whose cutoff is ωc=kc/εμ with the alternatives of clause (d); clause (c) excludes (0,0).

[F2]

The profile identities of The separated sine and cosine rectangle profiles: eigen-identities, boundary traces, orthogonality and Dirichlet integrals for (m,n)=(1,0): h10=cos⁡πx1a, k10=π/a, Δth10=−(π/a)2h10, ∂1h10=0 at x1∈{0,a} and ∂2h10=0 at x2∈{0,b}.

Verification

technique · direct: instantiate the TE candidate at $(1,0)$, read off the amplitudes and the wall conditions, and evaluate the cutoff and the index comparison
1.1F1F2algebra

[Instantiation] With (m,n)=(1,0) one has kc:=π/a, ∇th10=−πasin⁡πx1ae1 and ez×∇th10=−πasin⁡πx1ae2 by [F2] and the coordinate formula for the cross product, so the amplitudes of [F1] become E~=−(iωμa/π)(−sin⁡πx1a)e2=(0,iωμaπsin⁡πx1a,0) and H~=(iβa2/π2)(−πasin⁡πx1a)e1+cos⁡πx1aez=(−iβaπsin⁡πx1a,0,cos⁡πx1a), exactly as displayed. The theorem supplies smoothness, the four source-free equations, the TE property Ez=0 and the PEC wall conditions, and the first component E~1=E~3=0 shows that E is polarized along e2; the real fields are E=ωμaπsin⁡πx1aRe⁡(ieiθ) e2 and B=μRe⁡(H~eiθ), so the transverse factor sin⁡(πx1/a) is a fixed half-sine standing profile and the phase θ=βx3−ωt is a traveling wave in x3.

2.1step 1.1F1

[Cutoff and propagation alternatives] Applying clause (d) of [F1] with kc=π/a gives ωc=π/(aεμ): real longitudinal wave numbers with β2=ω2εμ−(π/a)2 exist exactly for ω≥ωc, with β≠0 exactly for ω>ωc and β=0 at ω=ωc; for ω<ωc the two algebraic roots are β=±i(π/a)2−ω2εμ and the same verified fields carry the factor e−Im⁡β x3, so the mode is evanescent.

2.2step 1.1F1algebra

[Lowest cutoff for a≥b] Let (m,n)≠(0,0) be any TE index pair and let kmn2=(mπa)2+(nπb)2. If m≥1 then kmn2≥(π/a)2; if m=0 then n≥1 and kmn2≥(π/b)2≥(π/a)2 because a≥b. Hence kmn2≥π2/a2=k102, with equality possible only for m=1,n=0, or for m=0,n=1 when a=b; since the cutoff ωc=kc/εμ is increasing in kc, the cutoff π/(aεμ) of the (1,0) candidate is the lowest cutoff of all TE indices. Every TM index has m,n≥1 by [F1], so its kmn2≥π2/a2+π2/b2>π2/a2 and its cutoff is strictly larger; and (m,n)=(0,0) is not a mode by the index restriction of [F1]. Thus ωc=π/(aεμ) is the lowest cutoff among those TE/TM candidates, attained also by (0,1) at a=b.

3.1step 1.1step 2.1step 2.2F1∎

[Scope] The displayed fields are an explicit conditional candidate of the adopted lossless model, with the stated cutoff and lower-bound comparison; the quantities are declared model parameters, no measurement, resonance observation, completeness or uniqueness is asserted, and no empirical premise is used.

ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passOpen item page →

A rectangular-cavity standing mode at resonance: explicit fields and the PEC end-cap check

Physical scope

An explicit conditional standing-wave cavity mode of the lossless isotropic scalar branch in the rectangular perfectly conducting cavity, with its exact resonance condition and end-cap check. No measured resonance or empirical claim.

Example

All displayed fields and parameters below are numerical values in fixed coherent SI units: a,b,d,xj in m, t in s, ω in s−1, ε in F m−1, μ in H m−1, E,Esp in V m−1 and B in T. The TM longitudinal normalization is E∗=1 V m−1 in The separated TE and TM candidate modes of the lossless rectangular PEC guide: exact verification, index restrictions and cutoff(b), so the dimensionless profile below specifies the numerical electric-field components.

Let a,b,d>0 and ε,μ>0 be constants, put Esp(x):=e1sin⁡πx2bsin⁡πx3d, and for ω>0 define E(x,t):=Esp(x)cos⁡(ωt) and B(x,t):=−1ω(curl⁡Esp)(x)sin⁡(ωt), where the curl is the fixed-time spatial curl of Divergence and curl of a C1 vector field. Then E,B are smooth, div⁡Esp=0, ΔEsp=−[(π/b)2+(π/d)2]Esp, and E,B satisfy the four source-free macroscopic equations on the box Ωc=(0,a)×(0,b)×(0,d) in the lossless isotropic scalar branch exactly when ω2=1εμ[(πb)2+(πd)2]; with that resonance, n×E=0 and n⋅B=0 hold on all six walls, so (E,B) is a PEC cavity mode. It is the cutoff instance β=0 of the TM family of The separated TE and TM candidate modes of the lossless rectangular PEC guide: exact verification, index restrictions and cutoff(b) taken with axis e1, cross-section (0,b)×(0,d) and indices (m,n)=(1,1): the field is independent of x1, which is why it also satisfies the x1=0 and x1=a end-cap conditions for every box length a>0. The example asserts a conditional model solution, not an observed resonance.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The SI numerical-value convention and E∗=1 V m−1 normalization of the Example; constants a,b,d>0 and ε,μ>0; Esp(x):=e1sin⁡πx2bsin⁡πx3d; for ω>0 the fields E(x,t):=Esp(x)cos⁡(ωt) and B(x,t):=−1ω(curl⁡Esp)(x)sin⁡(ωt) on the box Ωc=(0,a)×(0,b)×(0,d); the fixed-time spatial curl and divergence of Divergence and curl of a C1 vector field; the box geometry, its six open walls and the PEC conditions of Rectangular PEC guide and cavity geometry, the zero-normal-B reflection class, and axis-relative TE/TM/TEM.

[F1]

Profile identities: with e11(y1,y2):=sin⁡πy1bsin⁡πy2d on the rectangle (0,b)×(0,d) one has Δe11=−k112e11 with k112=(π/b)2+(π/d)2, e11=0 on the rectangle boundary; in particular sin⁡0=sin⁡π=0 and the second derivatives of the sine factors are −π2b2sin⁡πy1b and −π2d2sin⁡πy2d (The separated sine and cosine rectangle profiles: eigen-identities, boundary traces, orthogonality and Dirichlet integrals (b)).

[F2]

Use the positively oriented cyclic coordinates (y1,y2,y3)=(x2,x3,x1) with basis (e2,e3,e1): cyclic permutation leaves the coordinate cross-product, divergence and curl formulas unchanged. Thus the transverse lemma and candidate theorem apply with longitudinal axis e1 and transverse coordinates (x2,x3). For an x1-independent profile h regarded on the splitting R3=R2⊕Re1 with coordinates (x2,x3), curl⁡(e1h)=−e1×∇(2,3)h, div⁡(e1h)=∂1h=0, and e1×(e1×v)=−v for transverse v (Transverse vector-calculus identities for the splitting R3=R2⊕Rez (a),(b) applied with ez:=e1).

[F3]

With the stated SI numerical-value convention and E∗=1 V m−1, the TM family of The separated TE and TM candidate modes of the lossless rectangular PEC guide: exact verification, index restrictions and cutoff (b) with axis e1, cross-section (0,b)×(0,d), indices (1,1) and β=0: kc2=k112, and the amplitudes E~=iβkc2∇te+eze, H~=iωεkc2ez×∇te at β=0 become E~=e1e11 and H~=iωεk112e1×∇e11; the theorem gives smoothness, the four source-free equations at the cutoff ω2=kc2/(εμ), and the PEC conditions on the four faces with normals ±e2,±e3 (The separated TE and TM candidate modes of the lossless rectangular PEC guide: exact verification, index restrictions and cutoff (b),(d)).

Verification

technique · direct: compute the divergence, Laplacian and curl of the explicit spatial profile, verify the four equations and the six wall conditions, and identify the field with the cutoff TM instance
1.1F1F2algebra

[The spatial profile, the equations and the resonance] The profile has only its first component, independent of x1, so div⁡Esp=∂1(sin⁡πx2bsin⁡πx3d)=0 and ΔEsp=e1(∂22+∂32)e11=−[(π/b)2+(π/d)2]Esp=−k112Esp by [F1]. Hence div⁡E=div⁡Espcos⁡ωt=0 and div⁡B=−1ωdiv⁡(curl⁡Esp)sin⁡ωt=0 (a divergence of a curl vanishes componentwise by the equality of mixed partials of the smooth profile). Further curl⁡E=(curl⁡Esp)cos⁡ωt and −∂tB=(curl⁡Esp)cos⁡ωt, so Faraday's law holds identically. For Amp`ere's law compute curl⁡curl⁡Esp: by [F2] curl⁡Esp=curl⁡(e1e11)=−e1×∇e11=(0,∂3e11,−∂2e11), whose curl is (∂2(−∂2e11)−∂3(∂3e11),0,0)=−(Δe11)e1=k112e1e11=k112Esp by [F1]; therefore curl⁡H=1μcurl⁡B=−1ωμk112Espsin⁡ωt and ∂tD=ε∂tE=−εωEspsin⁡ωt, which agree exactly when k112=ω2εμ, i.e. when ω2=1εμ[(π/b)2+(π/d)2]. The fields are smooth because Esp is a product of sines and curl⁡Esp a finite combination of such products, and both are independent of x1.

2.1step 1.1F1F2algebra

[The six wall conditions] On the walls x1=0 and x1=a with normals ∓e1: n×E=∓e1×E=∓cos⁡ωt e1×Esp=0 since Esp is parallel to e1, and n⋅B=∓B1=±1ω(curl⁡Esp)1sin⁡ωt=0 because (curl⁡Esp)1=∂2(Esp)3−∂3(Esp)2=0. On the walls x2=0 and x2=b with normals ∓e2: e2×E=E1(e2×e1)=−E1e3 and E1=sin⁡πx2bsin⁡πx3dcos⁡ωt vanishes because sin⁡πx2b=0 there, so n×E=0; and n⋅B=∓B2=±1ω(curl⁡Esp)2sin⁡ωt with (curl⁡Esp)2=∂3(Esp)1−∂1(Esp)3=πdsin⁡πx2bcos⁡πx3d, which vanishes at x2=0,b. On the walls x3=0 and x3=d with normals ∓e3: e3×E=E1e2, whose coefficient E1 vanishes because sin⁡πx3d=0 there, so n×E=0; and n⋅B=∓B3=±1ω(curl⁡Esp)3sin⁡ωt with (curl⁡Esp)3=∂1(Esp)2−∂2(Esp)1=−πbcos⁡πx2bsin⁡πx3d, which vanishes at x3=0,d. Thus all six walls satisfy n×E=0 and n⋅B=0 at resonance.

3.1step 1.1step 2.1F2F3algebra

[Identification with the cutoff TM instance] In the setting of [F3] with axis e1, cross-section (0,b)×(0,d), indices (1,1) and β=0, the dispersion relation β2=ω2εμ−k112 at β=0 is exactly the resonance k112=ω2εμ of step 1.1, e11=sin⁡πx2bsin⁡πx3d, and the amplitudes become E~=e1e11 and H~=iωεk112e1×∇e11. Then θ=−ωt, E=Re⁡(E~e−iωt)=e1e11cos⁡ωt=Espcos⁡ωt, and B=μRe⁡(H~e−iωt)=μωεk112(e1×∇e11)sin⁡ωt=−1ωcurl⁡Espsin⁡ωt because curl⁡Esp=−e1×∇e11 [F2] and μωε/k112=1/ω at resonance. The amplitudes are independent of x1, which is why the end-cap conditions on x1=0,a hold for every box length a>0; the theorem's clause (d) supplies the resonance condition and clause (b) the guide-wall conditions on the four faces with normals ±e2,±e3.

4.1step 1.1step 2.1step 3.1F3∎

[Scope] The displayed pair is an explicit conditional standing-wave mode of the lossless isotropic scalar branch in the rectangular perfectly conducting cavity, with the exact resonance condition and the full wall check, identified as the cutoff β=0 TM(1,1) instance with axis e1; the example asserts a model solution and not an observed resonance, and no measurement, completeness or empirical claim is made.

ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passOpen item page →

TEM modes of a coaxial guide and the single-conductor obstruction for harmonic transverse potentials

Physical scope

The explicit coaxial TEM candidate of the lossless isotropic scalar branch with its per-length capacitance and inductance, and the obstruction showing that a single-conductor cross-section with connected boundary admits no nonzero TEM field in the harmonic-potential form. Includes complex potentials, both propagation signs, the zero-field label case and the star-shaped interior reduction with explicit boundary traces; no general simply connected reduction, lossy or empirical claim.

Example

Assume the lossless isotropic scalar constant branch of Declared material-closure branches: linear nondispersive Ohmic response and the causal memory branch, the macroscopic equations of The macroscopic Maxwell equations in terms of D, H and the free sources with ρf=0, Jf=0, and the straight-guide, TEM and separated-phasor conventions of Rectangular PEC guide and cavity geometry, the zero-normal-B reflection class, and axis-relative TE/TM/TEM; put Z:=μ/ε and v:=(εμ)−1/2. (a) [Potential form] Let A⊆R2 be a bounded connected C1 domain and let φ∈C2(A‾;C) (with real-valued potentials included) satisfy Δφ=0 on A (the plane Laplacian of The Laplacian of a C2 function and of a C2 vector field; a C2 function with Δφ=0 is called harmonic). For either sign ζ∈{+1,−1} define E~:=−∇φ, β:=ζω/v and H~:=ζez×E~/Z; then the separated real fields E=Re⁡(E~ei(βx3−ωt)), B=μRe⁡(H~ei(βx3−ωt)) satisfy the source-free lossless macroscopic equations with Ez=Bz=0 (TEM), and the PEC condition on a smooth wall with unit normal n is equivalent to ∂τφ=0 along that boundary curve, so that φ is constant on each connected component of ∂A. Moreover, if A is star-shaped (Star-shaped open subsets of Euclidean space), every separated TEM phasor with C1 transverse amplitudes has on the interior a complex harmonic potential φ∈C2(A;C), obtained by applying On a star-shaped open domain, closed, exact, conservative, path-independent, and zero-loop are equivalent to the real and imaginary electric amplitudes separately. If the field is nonzero, the equations force β2=εμω2, hence β=±ω/v, and H~=βez×E~/(ωμ), giving the two displayed signs. If the field is zero, E~=H~=0 solves the equations for every longitudinal label β, with no dispersion conclusion. The boundary potential description requires the stated continuous differentiable boundary trace (in particular the initial C2(A‾) potential has it); the interior exactness supplier alone is not asserted to produce a real potential or automatic boundary extension. (b) [Single-conductor obstruction] If in the potential-form setting ∂A is connected, then φ is constant on ∂A, hence φ is constant on A‾ by the two-dimensional classical Dirichlet uniqueness Uniqueness for the classical dirichlet problem, applied to its real and imaginary parts with their respective constants as second solutions, and therefore E~=H~=0: a single-conductor cross-section with connected boundary admits no nonzero TEM field in the potential form. The same potential-form obstruction applies to a rectangular cross-section with a potential in C2(A)∩C(A‾) having constant boundary trace, because this uniqueness supplier does not require a C1 boundary. For rectangular separated TEM amplitudes that are C1 on the interior and continuous on the closure with the classical PEC traces on open edges, the star-centre radial primitive extends continuously to the rectangle closure. The edgewise tangential derivative is the electric trace, so PEC makes the potential constant on each open edge and continuity joins those constants at the corners. Thus this stated rectangular class has no nonzero TEM field. (c) [Coaxial example] For the following Lebesgue polar-coordinate energy calculation assume Countable Choice ACω (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)). Let 0<a<b, A:={x∈R2:a<∣x∣<b} (two boundary components), fix V∈R, choose the forward label k:=ω/v, and define φ(x):=Vln⁡(b/∣x∣)/ln⁡(b/a), so that E~=Ver/(∣x∣ln⁡(b/a)) with er:=x/∣x∣ and H~=(V/(Z∣x∣ln⁡(b/a)))eφ with eφ:=ez×er. Then Δφ=0 on A: indeed ∂iln⁡∣x∣=xi/∣x∣2 by The natural logarithm has derivative 1/x and equals the integral from 1 to x of 1/t and the chain rule (The chain rule for total derivatives: D(g∘f)(a)=Dg(f(a))∘Df(a)), and the second partial derivatives sum to zero; hence φ is constant on each boundary circle (values V at ∣x∣=a and 0 at ∣x∣=b), the fields satisfy the source-free lossless macroscopic equations and the PEC conditions, and the relation k=ω/v is nondispersive with no cutoff. The amplitude integrals computed in polar coordinates with Polar coordinates decompose Lebesgue measure into r^{n-1} dr d sigma (the Jacobian factor r is read from that formula) are We:=12ε∫A∣E~∣2 dA=12CV2,Wm:=12μ∫A∣H~∣2 dA=12CV2,C:=2πεln⁡(b/a); the instantaneous per-length energies are 12CV2cos⁡2θ and 12LI2cos⁡2θ with θ=kx3−ωt; equivalently, with the per-length inductance L:=μln⁡(b/a)/(2π) in H m−1, per-length capacitance C in F m−1, and wall-circulation amplitude I:=2πV/(Zln⁡(b/a)) in A (identified with the inner-conductor sheet-current amplitude when its conductor-side magnetic intensity trace is zero) one has Wm=12LI2 and LC=εμ. For V≠0 the two boundary components carry distinct constants, allowing a nonzero field; V=0 gives equal constants and the zero field. (d) [Scope] The obstruction clause (b) is proved for the continuous-boundary harmonic-potential form. The star-shaped interior classification in (a) covers both signs and the zero field, with boundary conclusions under the stated potential-trace hypotheses; the general reduction of an arbitrary TEM field to the potential form on a merely simply connected non-star-shaped cross-section is not asserted here. The coaxial clause is an explicit conditional computation in the declared model with no empirical content; no lossy, radiation or signal-speed claim is made.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The lossless isotropic scalar constant branch of Declared material-closure branches: linear nondispersive Ohmic response and the causal memory branch with constants ε,μ>0 and relations D=εE, B=μH; the macroscopic equations of The macroscopic Maxwell equations in terms of D, H and the free sources with ρf=0, Jf=0; the straight-guide, TEM and separated-phasor conventions of Rectangular PEC guide and cavity geometry, the zero-normal-B reflection class, and axis-relative TE/TM/TEM; Z:=μ/ε and v:=(εμ)−1/2; a bounded connected C1 domain A⊆R2 and, in the star-shaped clause, a star-shaped such A; a potential φ∈C2(A‾;C) with Δφ=0 on A (the plane Laplacian of The Laplacian of a C2 function and of a C2 vector field, a C2 function with Δφ=0 being harmonic); for the coaxial clause 0<a<b, A={x∈R2:a<∣x∣<b}, real V, and Countable Choice ACω (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

[F1]

The declared real fields satisfy the source-free equations of [F1] of the theorem page exactly when their complex amplitudes satisfy div⁡^(E~)=0, div⁡^(H~)=0, curl⁡^(E~)=iωμH~, curl⁡^(H~)=−iωεE~, where div⁡^(w)=∂1w1+∂2w2+iβw3 and curl⁡^(w)=(∂2w3−iβw2, iβw1−∂1w3, ∂1w2−∂2w1) (Calculus of separated phasor fields: real-part derivative identities and amplitude injectivity, The macroscopic Maxwell equations in terms of D, H and the free sources clause (b), Declared material-closure branches: linear nondispersive Ohmic response and the causal memory branch clause (b)); a nonzero separated real field has nonzero amplitude, and a separated real field vanishes identically exactly when its amplitude does (Calculus of separated phasor fields: real-part derivative identities and amplitude injectivity clause (d)).

[F2]

Transverse vector identities: for a transverse vector v, ez×(ez×v)=−v, ez×v is transverse and ∣ez×v∣=∣v∣; and div⁡(ez×∇th)=0 for C2 h (Transverse vector-calculus identities for the splitting R3=R2⊕Rez (a), (c)). Cross-product and scalar-triple-product manipulations are those of The cross product in R3 and The cross product is bilinear, alternating, and orthogonal to both factors: a⋅(b×c)=det⁡[a b c] and a×b⊥a,b.

[F3]

Plane harmonic components are smooth, indeed real analytic, in the interior (Plane harmonic functions are smooth and real analytic); a C2 function on an open subset of R2 has equal mixed partials (Clairaut--Schwarz theorem for continuous second partial derivatives).

[F4]

Classical Dirichlet uniqueness: if Ω⊆Rn, n≥2, is bounded, nonempty and open and u,v∈C2(Ω)∩C(Ω‾) satisfy Δu=Δv in Ω and u=v on ∂Ω, then u=v on Ω‾; the statement requires no regularity of the boundary (Uniqueness for the classical dirichlet problem).

[F5]

On an open star-shaped U⊆Rn, a C1 field is closed exactly when it is exact, and exactness uses a C2 potential (On a star-shaped open domain, closed, exact, conservative, path-independent, and zero-loop are equivalent, Star-shaped open subsets of Euclidean space).

[F6]

One-variable and measure tools: for a differentiable function on an interval a vanishing derivative makes it constant, and ∫abG′=G(b)−G(a) for G with integrable derivative (The second fundamental theorem: if G is differentiable on [a,b] with G′=f and f is integrable, then ∫abf=G(b)−G(a)); log⁡′(x)=1/x and log⁡x=∫1xdt/t for x>0 (The natural logarithm has derivative 1/x and equals the integral from 1 to x of 1/t); composites obey the chain rule (The chain rule for total derivatives: D(g∘f)(a)=Dg(f(a))∘Df(a)); the polar-coordinate formula integrates continuous functions on the annulus with Jacobian factor r (Polar coordinates decompose Lebesgue measure into r^{n-1} dr d sigma, A C^1 diffeomorphism satisfies the change-of-variables formula for L^1 functions), the omitted radial segment being Lebesgue null (A box with a degenerate side is Lebesgue null, and so is every coordinate hyperplane in Rn); positive square roots exist and are unique (Square roots exist: a unique a≥0 with (a)2=a; the positives are {x2:x≠0}).

[F7]

In the lossless branch the stored-energy density and flux are those of Energy balance and Ohmic dissipation for the constant nondispersive linear model; only its local positive reading is used.

Verification

technique · direct: verify the potential-form amplitudes against the four amplitude equations and the PEC traces, classify an arbitrary $C^1$ TEM amplitude by the transverse curl components, apply two-dimensional Dirichlet uniqueness to the constant-boundary potentials, and compute the coaxial integrals in polar coordinates
1.1F1F2F3F6algebra

[Potential form and the PEC boundary equivalence] Let φ∈C2(A‾;C) with Δφ=0, fix ζ∈{+1,−1}, and put E~:=−∇φ, β:=ζω/v, H~:=ζez×E~/Z, with real fields E=Re⁡(E~ei(βx3−ωt)), B=μRe⁡(H~ei(βx3−ωt)). Then E~3=0 and H~3=0 because ez×E~ and ∇φ are transverse [F2], so Ez=Bz=0 (TEM); and the four amplitude equations of [F1] hold: div⁡^(E~)=−Δφ=0; div⁡^(H~)=ζZ(∂1(−E~2)+∂2(E~1))=−ζZcurl⁡2E~=0 because E~=−∇φ has equal mixed partials [F3]; curl⁡^(E~)=(iβ∂2φ, −iβ∂1φ, curl⁡2E~)=iβez×E~=iωμH~, using H~=βωμez×E~, which holds because βωμ=ζω/vωμ=ζvμ=ζZ since vμ=μ/ε=Z; and curl⁡2H~=(ζ/Z)div⁡tE~=0, hence curl⁡^(H~)=iβez×H~=iβ ζZez×(ez×E~)=−iζβZE~=−iωεE~ by [F2] and ζβZ=ω/vZ=ωvZ=ωε because vZ=1/ε. Hence the real fields satisfy the source-free lossless macroscopic equations by [F1]. If the potential has a differentiable boundary trace on a smooth wall of A with outward unit normal n (an in-plane unit vector) and tangent τ:=ez×n, then n×E~=(0,0,n1E~2−n2E~1) and, since E~=−∇φ, n1E~2−n2E~1=n2∂1φ−n1∂2φ=−∇φ⋅τ=−∂τφ, so n×E~=−ez∂τφ (only the vanishing of this normal-cross field is used below); likewise n⋅H~=ζZn⋅(ez×E~)=ζZE~⋅(n×ez)=−ζZE~⋅τ=ζZ∂τφ by the scalar triple product and n×ez=−τ [F2]. Since a separated real field vanishes identically exactly when its amplitude does [F1], the PEC conditions n×E=0 and n⋅B=0 hold exactly when ∂τφ=0 along the wall. In a C1 boundary parametrization the derivative of the potential trace is the parametrization speed times ∂τφ (up to orientation); the chain rule and FTC [F6] therefore make it locally constant when PEC is imposed. A locally constant function on a connected boundary component is constant there, since any one of its value fibres and its complement are both relatively open.

1.2F1F2F5F6algebra

[Converse classification and the star-shaped potential] Let (E~,H~) be C1 transverse amplitudes of a separated TEM field satisfying the four amplitude equations of [F1]. The third components of the two curl equations read curl⁡2E~=iωμH~3=0 and curl⁡2H~=−iωεE~3=0, while the two divergence equations read div⁡tE~=0 and div⁡tH~=0 (the iβ-terms vanish with the third components). The transverse part of Faraday reads (0,0,0) in its third component and (−iβE~2, iβE~1,0)=iβ ez×E~ in its transverse components, so iβ ez×E~=iωμH~ and, since ωμ>0, H~=βωμez×E~ with no division by β. Substituting into the transverse part of Ampere and using ez×(ez×E~)=−E~ [F2] gives −iβ2ωμE~=−iωεE~, that is (β2−εμω2)E~=0. If E~≠0 then β2=εμω2, so β=±ω/v by [F6]; if E~=0 then Faraday gives H~=0, and the zero field solves the equations for every longitudinal label β with no dispersion conclusion. Finally, if A is star-shaped and E~ is a C1 transverse closed field (curl⁡2E~=0), then its real and imaginary parts are closed C1 fields on the star-shaped domain, so [F5] supplies C2 potentials for each, hence a complex φ∈C2(A;C) with E~=−∇φ after a sign change, and div⁡tE~=0 makes Δφ=0; no real-only or boundary-extension conclusion is inferred from interior exactness.

2.1step 1.1F1F2F4F5F6

[Single-conductor obstruction] Suppose φ∈C2(A‾;C) is harmonic on the bounded connected domain A and has constant boundary trace on each connected component of ∂A, with the PEC potential description of step 1.1 available. If ∂A is connected, the trace is a single constant c, and applying [F4] to the real and imaginary parts of φ and of the constant function c gives φ=c on A‾; then E~=−∇φ=0 and H~∝ez×E~=0. For a rectangular cross-section with a potential in C2(A)∩C(A‾) having constant boundary trace the same argument applies, because [F4] requires only a bounded nonempty open set and no boundary regularity. For rectangular separated TEM amplitudes that are C1 on the interior and continuous on the closure with the classical PEC traces on the open edges, fix a star centre x∗ and use the radial primitive ψ(x)=∫01E~(x∗+t(x−x∗))⋅(x−x∗) dt furnished by [F5]. It is C2 on the interior with ∇ψ=E~; the displayed formula extends continuously to the closure by uniform continuity of the electric amplitude there. For two points on one open edge, apply the interior FTC line-integral identity on parallel interior segments and pass to the edge using this continuity. Thus the boundary potential increment is the integral of the continuous tangential electric trace, whose difference quotients give the edge derivative; PEC makes that derivative zero; by the one-variable constancy of [F6] the potential is constant on each open edge, and continuity at the corners joins those constants, so the trace is constant on ∂A and [F4] gives ψ constant, hence E~=0 and H~=0. Thus a single-conductor cross-section with connected boundary admits no nonzero TEM field in the stated potential form, and the same holds for the stated rectangular class.

2.2step 1.1F1F2F6algebra

[Coaxial annulus: potential and fields] In the annulus A={a<∣x∣<b} put φ(x):=Vln⁡(b/∣x∣)/ln⁡(b/a) and choose the forward label k:=ω/v (so ζ=+1). Since ∂iln⁡∣x∣=xi/∣x∣2 by [F6] and the chain rule, ∂i∂iln⁡∣x∣=1/∣x∣2−2xi2/∣x∣4 and Δln⁡∣x∣=2/∣x∣2−2/∣x∣2=0, so Δφ=0 on A; also φ=V on ∣x∣=a and φ=0 on ∣x∣=b, so the trace is constant on each boundary circle. The constructed fields of step 1.1 are then E~=−∇φ=Ver/(∣x∣ln⁡(b/a)) with er=x/∣x∣, and H~=ez×E~/Z=(V/(Z∣x∣ln⁡(b/a)))eφ with eφ:=ez×er; by step 1.1 they satisfy the source-free lossless macroscopic equations and the PEC conditions, and the longitudinal label satisfies k=ω/v, nondispersive with no cutoff, so k is real and nonzero for every ω>0.

3.1step 2.1step 2.2F1F6F7algebra

[Coaxial energies in polar coordinates] Assume ACω. With We:=12ε∫A∣E~∣2dA and Wm:=12μ∫A∣H~∣2dA, the polar formula of [F6] (Jacobian r; the omitted radial segment is null) and ∣E~∣2=Z2∣H~∣2=V2/(∣x∣2ln⁡2(b/a)) give ∫A∣E~∣2dA=∫02π∫abV2r2ln⁡2(b/a)r dr dθ=2πV2ln⁡(b/a), using ∫abdr/r=ln⁡(b/a) by [F6]. Hence We=12εV22πln⁡(b/a)=12CV2 with C:=2πεln⁡(b/a), and Wm=12μV2Z22πln⁡(b/a)=12CV2 because μ/Z2=ε. For the sheet-current reading additionally assume zero conductor-side magnetic intensity trace. On the inner wall the filling normal is n=−er, so Rectangular PEC guide and cavity geometry, the zero-normal-B reflection class, and axis-relative TE/TM/TEM(b) gives K~f=n×(0−H~)=H~φ(a)ez. Without that additional trace assumption the following I is only the filling-side wall circulation. Integrating that axial circulation around the circle gives I=2πaH~φ(a)=2πV/(Zln⁡(b/a)). With L:=μln⁡(b/a)2π one gets 12LI2=12μln⁡(b/a)2π4π2V2Z2ln⁡2(b/a)=122πμV2Z2ln⁡(b/a)=12CV2=Wm, and LC=μln⁡(b/a)2π2πεln⁡(b/a)=εμ. The instantaneous per-length energies are 12CV2cos⁡2θ and 12LI2cos⁡2θ with θ=kx3−ωt, by the definitions of E and B and the identity Re⁡(weiθ)2+∣Im⁡(weiθ)∣2=∣w∣2; for V=0 all fields and energies vanish. For V≠0 the two boundary components carry distinct constants V and 0, whereas V=0 gives the zero field with equal boundary constants; this respects the obstruction of step 2.1.

4.1step 1.2step 2.1step 2.2step 3.1∎

[Scope] Clause (a) is steps 1.1 and 1.2: the potential form gives TEM fields satisfying the equations and turns PEC on a smooth wall into the vanishing tangential potential derivative, the converse classification gives the two nonzero signs β=±ω/v and the unrestricted label for the zero field, and the star-shaped interior exactness is used only with the stated potential-trace hypotheses for boundary conclusions. Clause (b) is step 2.1, proved for the continuous-boundary harmonic-potential form and the stated rectangular class; the general reduction of an arbitrary TEM field to the potential form on a merely simply connected non-star-shaped cross-section is not asserted. Clause (c) is steps 2.2 and 3.1: the coaxial computation is conditional, in the declared lossless model, with the polar-measure branch the only place Countable Choice is used, and no lossy, radiation, empirical or signal-speed claim is made.

Sources