How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Smooth matter quantities, current and observer observables
1 · Prerequisites
- Abelian Categories
- Absolute and Conditional Convergence; Rearrangement; Products
- Arc Length and Rectifiable Curves
- Areas of Elementary Plane Figures
- Banach-Space Differential Calculus and Banach Manifolds
- Binary Operations, Monoids, Groups and Subgroups
- Bounded Linear Operators and Quotient Spaces
- Categories, Functors and Natural Transformations
- Chain Complexes and Homology
- Cm Math Continuum
- Compactness
- Compactness in Metric Spaces
- Completeness, Completion, and Uniform Continuity
- Complex Coordinate and Path Transport
- Complex Differentiability and the Cauchy–Riemann Equations
- Complex Norms and Realification
- Complexification, Realification and Real Structures
- Connectedness
- Connections And Free Fall
- Connections Levi Civita and Parallel Transport
- Construction of the Natural Numbers
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Cauchy Sequences
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Dedekind Cuts
- Continuity, IVT, EVT, and Uniform Continuity
- Cosets, Index and Lagrange's Theorem
- Countability and Uncountability
- Countability Axioms and Cardinal Functions
- Curvature And Tides
- Density Separability and Convolution in Lᵖ
- Determinants of Matrices over a Commutative Ring
- Distributions Test Functions and Differentiation
- Divisibility, Euclidean Domains, Principal Ideal Domains and Unique Factorisation
- Dual Spaces, Bilinear and Quadratic Forms, and Sylvester's Law of Inertia
- Einstein And Matter
- Einstein–Maxwell primitive quantities and SI conventions
- Em Expanded Analysis Prerequisites
- Em Minkowski Mathematical Prerequisites
- Euclidean Ordinary Differential Equations with Smooth Dependence
- Exterior Powers, Orientation and Hodge Duality
- Fibrations Fiber Bundles and Homotopy Exact Sequences
- Filters and Ultrafilters
- Finite Counting, Factorials and Binomial Coefficients
- Finite Dimensional Normed Spaces and Riesz Lemma
- Fixed-endpoint curved charge variation
- Forces and Continuum
- Foundations of the Real Numbers for Analysis
- Framework And Geometry
- Free Modules, Exact Sequences, Projective and Injective Modules
- Fubini and Change of Variables
- Fundamental Trigonometric Identities
- Gauge/diffeomorphism matter identity and field exchange
- Gaussian Elimination, Elementary Matrices and Reduced Row Echelon Form
- Geodesics, the Exponential Map, Completeness, and Hopf–Rinow
- Group Actions, Orbits, Stabilisers and Cayley's Theorem
- Group Homomorphisms and the Isomorphism Theorems
- Hereditary and Productive Behaviour of the Separation Axioms
- Ideals, Quotient Rings and the Isomorphism Theorems for Rings
- Improper Integrals
- Independent equation-based Einstein–Maxwell coupling
- Inner Product Spaces, Gram-Schmidt, Projections and Adjoints
- Integration of Forms and the General Stokes Theorem
- Lebesgue Measure on Euclidean Space
- Limits and Colimits
- Limits of Real Functions
- limsup, liminf, and Subsequential Limits
- Line Integrals and the Gradient Theorem
- Linear Algebra Methods in Combinatorics
- Linear Independence, Bases and Dimension
- Linear Transformations, Rank-Nullity and Quotient Spaces
- Local potentials and smooth circle-bundle connection data
- Lorentz covariant formulation
- Lorentz Transformations
- Manifolds with Boundary Collars and Orientations
- Matrices, the Matrix of a Linear Map, and Change of Basis
- Measurable Functions and Simple Approximation
- Measures and Their Basic Properties
- Metric Spaces
- Mixed Partials, Taylor Formulae, and Extrema
- Modules, Submodules, Quotient Modules and the Isomorphism Theorems
- Monotone Functions, Discontinuities, and Continuity Sets
- Monotone Sequences, Bolzano-Weierstrass, and Cauchy Completeness
- Morse Critical Points Hessians and Indices
- Normal Subgroups and Quotient Groups
- Normed and Banach Spaces
- Observer Measurements
- Order, Zorn's Lemma, and the Axiom of Choice
- Oriented Lorentzian fields, observers and coordinate conventions
- Outer Measure and the Caratheodory Extension Theorem
- Particle spacetime, observers and worldlines
- Partitions of Unity and Paracompactness
- Picard-Lindelöf and First-Order Ordinary Differential Equations
- Pointwise Extended-Real Function Products
- Polynomial Rings, the Division Algorithm and Roots
- Power Series and Real-Analytic Functions
- Preadditive and Additive Categories and Biproducts
- Primitives and postulates
- Product Measures and the Fubini Tonelli Theorems
- Properties of the Integral and the Working FTC
- Rank Theorems and Embedded Submanifolds
- Regular Surfaces and Surface Integrals
- Relations, Functions, and Quotients
- Riemann Curvature and Riemannian Submanifolds
- Riemannian Metrics Length Distance and Volume
- Rings, Subrings, Integral Domains and Fields
- Rⁿ as a Normed Space; Vector-Valued Functions
- Roots, Rational Powers, and Classical Inequalities
- Schwartz Space and the Plancherel Theorem
- Separation Axioms: the Hierarchy
- Sequences and Limits
- Sequences and Series of Functions; Uniform Convergence
- Series: Convergence and the Nonnegative Tests
- Sigma Algebras and Borel Sets
- Simple Field Extensions and the Construction of the Complex Numbers
- Simplicial Complexes and Simplicial Homology
- Sine, Cosine, and the Definition of Pi
- Singular Chains and Singular Homology
- Singular Cochains Mayer Vietoris and Smooth Singular Comparison
- Singular Cohomology and Coefficient Theorems
- Smooth formal matter, EM tensors and observer quantities
- Smooth Manifolds and Smooth Maps
- Smooth Partitions of Unity and Exhaustions
- Smooth Vector Bundles and Sections
- Sourced Maxwell sign and current conservation
- Spacetime Primitives
- Subspaces, Products, and Quotients
- Suprema and Infima
- Symmetric Groups, Cycle Decomposition and the Sign Homomorphism
- Tangent Cotangent and the Differential
- Tensor Fields Exterior Algebra and Differential Forms
- Tensor Products of Modules
- Tensors And Observers
- The Cantor Set, Baire Category, and Measure Zero in ℝ
- The Complex Exponential and Euler's Formula
- The De Rham Complex Homotopy and Mayer Vietoris
- The de Rham Theorem and Degree
- The Derivative and the Mean Value Theorems
- The Determinant of a Linear Operator, Cofactors and Cramer's Rule
- The Divergence Theorem and Classical Stokes
- The Exponential Function
- The Exterior Derivative and Cartan Calculus
- The Fundamental Theorems of Calculus
- The Inverse and Implicit Function Theorems
- The Inverse Function Theorem Completed
- The Lebesgue Integral and the Convergence Theorems
- The Logarithm and General Powers
- The Lᵖ Spaces Holder Minkowski and Riesz Fischer
- The Maximal Function and Lebesgue Differentiation
- The Riemann Integral in Rᵐ and Jordan Content
- The Riemann Integral: Definition and Integrability
- The Topology of Euclidean Space
- The Total Derivative in ℝᵐ → ℝⁿ
- The ZFC Axioms and the Basic Set Constructions
- Topological Spaces and Continuity
- Topology of ℝ
- Triangularisation, Generalised Eigenspaces and Jordan Canonical Form
- Uniform Spaces: the Three Definitions
- Vector Fields Flows and Lie Derivatives
- Vector Spaces, Linear Subspaces, Span and Direct Sums
- Volumes of Elementary Solids and Solids of Revolution
- Worldlines And Clocks
2 · Summary
Scope
This page fixes the smooth SI matter, current, stress and observer quantities used by the selected equation-based Einstein–Maxwell framework. It then adopts two restricted matter branches: transported charged dust and a smooth charged perfect fluid with an optional Ohmic current. Their consequences are conditional deductions from the adopted closures and the listed mathematical suppliers. The page distinguishes local matter exchange, comoving mechanical work, finite-domain Killing flux and pointwise energy conditions.
The models are classical smooth continua. The dust branch makes no coupled PDE existence claim and asserts neither a global smooth continuation nor single-velocity validity beyond its stated smooth domain. The fluid branch does not supply an equation of state, global conducting-fluid theory or entropy-production law. A local symmetry charge includes its finite side-flux term, and the observer energy conditions apply only to electromagnetic stress, nonnegative dust, or fluids satisfying their exact inequalities. No measurements, empirical validation, global potential, singular source, local gravitational-energy tensor or unconditional matter-positivity premise is asserted.
3 · Logical flowchart
4 · Definitions, postulates, theorems and proofs
Smooth matter quantities, current and observer observables
Framework-local SI definitions of smooth matter fields, selected dust and perfect-fluid stress/current closures, and observer contractions in the equation-based Einstein–Maxwell model. It makes no empirical claim and supplies no general matter closure or coupled-field existence result.
Definition
Let be an open subset of the smooth, oriented, time-oriented Lorentzian four-manifold of Einstein–Maxwell primitive quantities and SI conventions, with signature and metric-selected Levi–Civita connection . The exact tensor types, formal matter systems, stress convention, observer conventions and smoothness levels below are those of Smooth formal matter, EM tensors and observer quantities. Use SI units with length coordinates as in Einstein–Maxwell primitive quantities and SI conventions; no numerical value of the experimentally determined is treated as exact.
At a point , an observer is a future-directed unit timelike vector satisfying . A smooth field of such vectors is an observer congruence. A local tetrad on an open set is a tuple of smooth vector fields forming a basis of at every and satisfying , where , as in Einstein–Maxwell primitive quantities and SI conventions; its value at a point is an orthonormal tangent-space basis. An observer, a congruence, a tetrad and a coordinate chart are different objects. A four-velocity field is a future-timelike vector field with ; is its unit observer at each point. A proper-time worldline segment is a future-directed timelike curve on an interval of proper time in seconds, with and along the segment. These are local model fields and curves; no global flow or completeness is included.
The matter variables are constitutive inputs of a selected model: rest-mass density in , rest-charge density in , rest-energy density in , and isotropic pressure in . A smooth matter current has units , and a symmetric matter stress tensor has units in the stated length-coordinate convention. Their physical meanings are fixed only after a constitutive branch is selected:
- For charged dust, and . Here is rest-mass density, not energy density.
- For a perfect fluid, . Its rest-frame entries are . No equation of state is included by this tensor definition.
- An optional conducting-fluid current is , where and is a rest-space conduction-current density in . The separate constitutive choice uses a scalar conductivity in and is not part of the general definition.
For a smooth real electromagnetic two-form and positive , define the electromagnetic stress by
The components of in an orthonormal tetrad have tesla units. For an observer , the observer electric field is in ; with , write . The observer magnetic field is the spatial covector in tesla, with the orientation and Hodge convention of Einstein–Maxwell primitive quantities and SI conventions. These observer fields depend on ; they are not global observer-independent three-vectors.
Define the matter-plus-field force density by , in , and the matter exchange equation by . This equation is a condition of a selected coupled model, not a consequence of the tensor definitions alone. For any unit observer , define the measured energy density of a symmetric stress tensor by in . Define its spatial energy-current vector by , where projects to ; its orthonormal-frame physical energy flux is in . These contractions are derived, observer-dependent quantities.
Within the selected Einstein–Maxwell formulation, the fields and may be dynamical unknowns in a coupled branch or prescribed data in a test branch. The matter variables and any chosen conductivity or equation of state are independent constitutive input. The current, stress, force density, electromagnetic stress, observer fields and observer contractions are derived from those inputs by the displayed definitions. This definition makes no identification with Newtonian or thermodynamic quantities solely because units agree; it records no measurement and asserts no matter evolution, entropy law, or coupled Einstein–Maxwell solution.
Selected transported charged-dust Einstein–Maxwell model
A selected smooth charged-dust continuum with one four-velocity field U on its stated domain in the equation-based Einstein–Maxwell model. It adopts the dust stress/current closure, undivided mass and force equations, and charge conservation; the ratio is transported only on positive-density domains. It makes no coupled PDE existence claim and asserts neither a global smooth continuation nor single-velocity validity beyond the stated domain; singular particles and empirical validity are outside scope.
Postulate
On an open region of the smooth oriented, time-oriented Lorentzian spacetime and SI conventions of Smooth matter quantities, current and observer observables, adopt the equation-based Einstein and smooth curved Maxwell systems of Equation-based Einstein–Maxwell model and Smooth curved vacuum Maxwell constitutive adoption, with the smooth matter quantities and electromagnetic stress of Smooth matter quantities, current and observer observables. Thus the coupled branch includes the adopted Einstein equation and Maxwell equations , , using the fixed local SI signs, units and curvature convention of those suppliers. Their adopted equations remain physical assumptions; neither is deduced here from flat spacetime, variational stationarity, or mathematical structure.
Choose smooth on , with , future timelike, , and wherever . Select the pressureless dust closure
As the matter model, adopt the undivided smooth mass and Lorentz-force equations
and charge-current conservation . On each open region define . Under the adopted mass continuity and charged-dust forms, Charged dust balance equivalence and advected charge ratio gives the exact equivalence between charge-current conservation and transport . The ratio is not defined and no division is made on . This ratio statement is restricted to ; no global coupled evolution theorem is asserted.
This is a selected classical pressureless continuum model with one four-velocity field on the stated smooth domain. It excludes viscosity, conduction, multistream averaging, spin, point sources, self-field products and a general dust action. The finely fixed charge-to-mass ratio used in the specific ECD solutions of Meinel and Hütten is not a law of this general model. The postulate asserts neither a global smooth continuation nor validity of a single-velocity description beyond the stated domain; it makes no coupled-solution existence, uniqueness, stability, or empirical claim.
Selected charged perfect-fluid exchange/Ohmic branch
A selected smooth positive-rest-energy perfect-fluid domain coupled through the adopted Einstein–Maxwell equations and matter exchange. The current is either convective or uses a separately selected smooth Ohmic conduction branch. It asserts no global fluid or conducting-fluid evolution, entropy law, or empirical validity.
Postulate
On a smooth open state domain in the spacetime and SI conventions of Smooth matter quantities, current and observer observables, choose rest-energy density , pressure , rest-charge density , and a future-timelike field with . The equation-based coupled branch uses Equation-based Einstein–Maxwell model and Smooth curved vacuum Maxwell constitutive adoption with a smooth symmetric matter tensor and current supplied by this selected fluid model. Adopt the perfect-fluid tensor
and either the convective current or a separately specified conduction current with . Adopt charge continuity and the local matter-exchange balance . The fields and derivatives are smooth enough for these equations to hold pointwise.
For an optional Ohmic branch, choose a smooth scalar conductivity in and impose , where is the rest-frame electric field in . This is a separate constitutive adoption, not a consequence of covariance or of the Maxwell equations. A smooth equation of state may be supplied on the chosen local state domain; no particular function, relativistic entropy law, causality assertion, or thermodynamic interpretation of is included here. The stress-projection and comoving work identities follow conditionally from Perfect-fluid exchange projections and conduction heating, but no global fluid or conducting-fluid solution theory is asserted.
This postulate adopts a local classical matter branch. It does not presume an unspecified matter action or infer empirical validity from the source literature.
Dust continuity, transport and Lorentz acceleration
A conditional local stress/current balance reduction for the selected smooth charged-dust continuum on an open positive-density region. It identifies the exact mass-continuity, charge-transport and Lorentz-force equations and asserts no coupled PDE existence or behavior at zero density.
Statement
Let be an open positive-density region of the charged-dust model in Selected transported charged-dust Einstein–Maxwell model. Let with , let be future timelike with , and let the smooth electromagnetic two-form and metric be those of that model. Set , , and .
On the adopted charged-dust matter-exchange equation is equivalent to
Under the mass-continuity equation, is equivalent to transport of the charge-to-mass ratio along the flow, . These are model deductions on ; the ratio and the divided force law are not defined at zero density. The result is local to its stated smooth positive-density domain and asserts neither a global smooth continuation nor validity of the single-velocity model beyond that domain. It supplies no Maxwell or Einstein solution or coupled-field existence theorem.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The smooth fields, regularity, normalization, dust closure and positive-density domain in the Statement, together with the selected physical branch and the exact mathematical supplier below.
Selected transported charged-dust Einstein–Maxwell model: the selected model uses , , the undivided mass and Lorentz-force equations, and charge-current conservation; on it uses .
Charged dust balance equivalence and advected charge ratio: for , real , and future timelike with , its stated stress-exchange implication and its charge-conservation/transport equivalence under continuity apply. The stress-exchange implication assumes the exchange equation, so step 1.1 proves the converse directly. This current supplier is a draft result and is used only at these stated interfaces.
Proof
The physical fields in [A1] have the regularity, positive-density domain, normalization, dust stress and current required by [F1]. If the stress-exchange equation holds, the stated implication in [F1] gives mass continuity and the Lorentz-force equation. Conversely, the product rule gives ; if mass continuity and the Lorentz-force equation hold, this equals , recovering stress exchange. Hence the two directions of the equivalence hold on , with division used only there.
Under the mass-continuity equation from step 1.1, the current-conservation clause of [F1] applies to and , giving exactly when . The equivalence is only along and imposes no transverse constancy; neither statement is extended to .
Convective/Ohmic comoving mechanical work prediction
A conditional local energy and pressure-force projection for the selected smooth charged perfect fluid. Comoving electromagnetic work is zero for the convective current and is nonnegative for the separately adopted smooth Ohmic law. This is a mechanical balance, not an entropy theorem or global fluid solution.
Statement
Let be a smooth open state domain of Selected charged perfect-fluid exchange/Ohmic branch. Assume , is future timelike with , is a smooth electromagnetic two-form, and the matter stress and current satisfy the selected fluid closure and exchange equation. Define
Then the longitudinal work and rest-space force equations are
For the convective branch , the comoving electromagnetic work is zero. For the optional smooth Ohmic branch , , with , it is
Here is the rest-frame electric field and the induced metric on is positive definite. This is a conditional mechanical energy identity; it does not assert an entropy-production law, equation-of-state evolution, causal constitutive theory, or fluid existence.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The regularity, timelike normalization, perfect-fluid stress, selected current, smooth electromagnetic field and matter-exchange equation in the Statement.
Selected charged perfect-fluid exchange/Ohmic branch: the selected smooth model adopts and , with either or the separately specified smooth conduction current and .
Perfect-fluid exchange projections and conduction heating: for these fluid scalars, unit-normalized , and the exchange equation, the two displayed projections are equivalent to the full tensor balance; if with , then , while gives zero work. This is a draft mathematical supplier and is used only at its exact current statement.
Proof
The physical stress, current, smoothness and normalization in [A1] match the hypotheses of [F1]. Applying its projection identity to gives the stated longitudinal energy equation and orthogonal pressure/acceleration equation, with no equation-of-state or entropy premise.
For , antisymmetry of gives . For , the same antisymmetry gives . Under the optional law , this equals because and is positive definite; hence the two stated work branches follow.
Selected total-stress/Killing charges
Conditional total-stress conservation and finite-domain Killing flux for the selected smooth charged-dust Einstein–Maxwell branch, plus the local gauge-compensated first integral for a separate prescribed-field charged test body. Finite-chain side flux and local-potential conditions are retained; no gravitational-field energy, global charge, self-field, or global trajectory claim is made. The probe branch carries ACω through the published RPM action-equivalence result.
Statement
Let be a smooth positive-density region of the selected charged-dust model, and require to satisfy the smoothness hypotheses of the Maxwell-stress and Killing-current suppliers. Assume the dust fields satisfy the model equations and the conditional matter-exchange identity of Dust continuity, transport and Lorentz acceleration, and assume the smooth Maxwell equations of Smooth curved vacuum Maxwell constitutive adoption. Define . Let be a smooth Killing field on , meaning , and set . For any finite smooth singular -chain in with boundary , define . Then
The two slice charges are equal only when the side flux vanishes. This is a matter-plus-electromagnetic stress current, not a local gravitational-energy tensor; no asymptotic or universal global energy is asserted.
There is also the following separate test-body clause. Assume for the canonical tangent-bundle smooth structure. On a local potential domain , let be a supplied smooth one-form with and let be a smooth scalar such that . Let be a finite future-timelike curve segment, parameterized by proper time , with fixed-endpoint variations as in External-field charged-particle action. If the segment is stationary for that adopted action, then Stationary charged action and Lorentz force gives for its constant , , and . Consequently
is constant along the segment and is invariant under , . This conditional test-body identity uses no self-field, global potential, trajectory-existence, or Einstein-solution claim.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The smooth Einstein–Maxwell dust branch, positive-density domain, Killing field, finite-chain boundary and side-flux hypotheses in the first clause; and, separately, the local potential, symmetry compensator, finite fixed-endpoint test-body segment and hypothesis in the second clause.
Selected transported charged-dust Einstein–Maxwell model: the selected branch adopts , , smooth Maxwell fields, and the undivided dust equations on a positive-density region.
Smooth curved vacuum Maxwell constitutive adoption: on the smooth oriented Lorentzian domain the adopted field law is and with the selected SI sign.
Dust continuity, transport and Lorentz acceleration: on , the adopted dust equations give the exact matter-exchange identity .
Curved electromagnetic stress divergence: for smooth , , , and , the electromagnetic tensor obeys . Its current proof and mathematical dependencies remain draft material, so this use is conditional.
Killing exchange current and gauge-compensated charged first integral: under the smooth Maxwell equations and matter exchange, a symmetric total stress gives a divergence-free Killing current, the finite-chain side-flux balance, and, for a local potential and Lorentz-force test curve with , the stated gauge-compensated constant.
Charged and spinning test-body quantities: the test body has constant , constant charge , a future-timelike worldline parameterized by proper time, and a prescribed field with a local potential where used.
External-field charged-particle action: on a finite local-potential segment, the adopted model trajectories are stationary points of the displayed fixed-endpoint external-field action.
Stationary charged action and Lorentz force: under that postulate, the charged-body definitions, finite-variation hypotheses and , stationarity is equivalent to . This published supplier is used only at its stated finite-segment interface.
The Axiom of Countable Choice (): assume the Axiom of Countable Choice for the canonical tangent-bundle smooth structure; the test-body clause uses it through [F4].
Proof
By [A1], [A2] and the local result [L1], the dust model gives on . The adopted Maxwell equations in [A1] match the smoothness and source-sign hypotheses of [F1], which gives . Raising/lowering with identifies these force-density terms with opposite signs, so adding the two identities yields .
Under [A3], the finite proper-time segment and charged-body quantities satisfy [F3] and [A3]; therefore [F4] supplies the Lorentz-force equation required by [F2]. No new trajectory is constructed.
The total stress is symmetric as the sum of symmetric matter and electromagnetic tensors. The Killing-field and finite-chain hypotheses in the first clause match [F2], so its current conclusion gives and its boundary formula gives . Equality follows only when the specified side flux is zero.
Apply the local test-body clause of [F2] to the equation from step 1.2 and the supplied , . It gives constancy and gauge invariance of on the segment. The result remains conditional on the local potential, symmetry and finite-segment hypotheses.
Observer energy conditions for selected matter plus EM
Pointwise observer interpretation of the selected smooth electromagnetic, charged-dust and perfect-fluid stress tensors. Electromagnetic and nonnegative-dust energy conditions are conditional tensor deductions; perfect-fluid conclusions require the exact stated inequalities. No general matter positivity or empirical claim is made.
Statement
Use the smooth electromagnetic stress, observer contractions and selected matter tensors of Smooth matter quantities, current and observer observables, with and a future unit observer . The electromagnetic tensor is symmetric and trace-free, and it satisfies WEC, NEC, SEC and DEC. In a positively oriented orthonormal rest tetrad, with the cross product taken in the oriented Euclidean rest space, its energy density and spatial energy-current components are
For charged dust with , the matter tensor and its sum with the electromagnetic tensor satisfy all four conditions. For a selected perfect-fluid tensor with rest energy density and pressure , the exact pointwise conditions on the matter tensor are
If the perfect-fluid tensor satisfies any one of these conditions, adding the electromagnetic tensor preserves that condition. The inequalities are not assumed universally, and adding the electromagnetic tensor to arbitrary matter need not repair a violated condition.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The smooth Lorentzian metric, positive , observer, electromagnetic field and selected dust or perfect-fluid tensors in the Statement.
Smooth matter quantities, current and observer observables: , , , and the dust and perfect-fluid matter tensor definitions.
EM, dust and perfect-fluid energy inequalities: the electromagnetic tensor satisfies WEC, NEC, SEC and DEC with rest-frame density and energy flux ; dust with satisfies all four; the displayed perfect-fluid inequalities are exact; sums preserve each satisfied condition. This draft mathematical proof is used only at its stated algebraic interface.
The dust branch, when used, assumes . No sign restriction is added to or except when a particular perfect-fluid condition is asserted.
Proof
The definitions in [F1] fix the electromagnetic stress and observer convention. The mathematical component and cone argument [F2] establishes its symmetry, trace, observer density and flux, and all four energy conditions. The same supplier gives the exact inequalities for the selected dust and perfect-fluid tensors under [A1].
At each point, [F2] proves the future-causal cone and each quadratic condition are preserved under addition of tensors that satisfy the same condition. Therefore nonnegative dust plus the electromagnetic tensor satisfies all four; a perfect-fluid sum satisfies each condition asserted only when the corresponding listed fluid inequalities hold. No conclusion is made for an arbitrary matter tensor.
5 · Examples, experiments and counterexamples
None yet.
Sources
- Sean M. Carroll, Lecture Notes on General Relativity, arXiv:gr-qc/9712019v1, complete 238-page lecture notes
- David Tong, General Relativity, complete author-hosted 290-page lecture notes
- Reinhard Meinel and Moritz Hütten, On the black hole limit of electrically counterpoised dust configurations, arXiv:1105.3807v3 (2011)