Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Smooth matter quantities, current and observer observables

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

Scope

This page fixes the smooth SI matter, current, stress and observer quantities used by the selected equation-based Einstein–Maxwell framework. It then adopts two restricted matter branches: transported charged dust and a smooth charged perfect fluid with an optional Ohmic current. Their consequences are conditional deductions from the adopted closures and the listed mathematical suppliers. The page distinguishes local matter exchange, comoving mechanical work, finite-domain Killing flux and pointwise energy conditions.

The models are classical smooth continua. The dust branch makes no coupled PDE existence claim and asserts neither a global smooth continuation nor single-velocity validity beyond its stated smooth domain. The fluid branch does not supply an equation of state, global conducting-fluid theory or entropy-production law. A local symmetry charge includes its finite side-flux term, and the observer energy conditions apply only to electromagnetic stress, nonnegative dust, or fluids satisfying their exact inequalities. No measurements, empirical validation, global potential, singular source, local gravitational-energy tensor or unconditional matter-positivity premise is asserted.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, postulates, theorems and proofs

DefinitionDefinition: AI-adaptedProof: Not applicableOpen item page →

Smooth matter quantities, current and observer observables

Physical scope

Framework-local SI definitions of smooth matter fields, selected dust and perfect-fluid stress/current closures, and observer contractions in the equation-based Einstein–Maxwell model. It makes no empirical claim and supplies no general matter closure or coupled-field existence result.

Definition

Let Ω be an open subset of the smooth, oriented, time-oriented Lorentzian four-manifold (M,g,N,o) of Einstein–Maxwell primitive quantities and SI conventions, with signature (−,+,+,+) and metric-selected Levi–Civita connection ∇. The exact tensor types, formal matter systems, stress convention, observer conventions and smoothness levels below are those of Smooth formal matter, EM tensors and observer quantities. Use SI units with length coordinates x0=ct as in Einstein–Maxwell primitive quantities and SI conventions; no numerical value of the experimentally determined μ0 is treated as exact.

At a point p∈Ω, an observer is a future-directed unit timelike vector n∈TpM satisfying g(n,n)=−1. A smooth field of such vectors is an observer congruence. A local tetrad on an open set V⊆Ω is a tuple of smooth vector fields (e0,e1,e2,e3) forming a basis of TxM at every x∈V and satisfying g(eα,eβ)=ηαβ, where η=diag⁡(−1,1,1,1), as in Einstein–Maxwell primitive quantities and SI conventions; its value at a point is an orthonormal tangent-space basis. An observer, a congruence, a tetrad and a coordinate chart are different objects. A four-velocity field U is a C2 future-timelike vector field with g(U,U)=−c2; n=U/c is its unit observer at each point. A proper-time worldline segment is a C2 future-directed timelike curve z:I→Ω on an interval I of proper time τ in seconds, with dz/dτ=U and g(U,U)=−c2 along the segment. These are local model fields and curves; no global flow or completeness is included.

The matter variables are constitutive inputs of a selected model: rest-mass density ρ in kg m−3, rest-charge density σ in C m−3, rest-energy density ϵ in J m−3, and isotropic pressure p in J m−3. A smooth matter current ja has units A m−2, and a symmetric matter stress tensor Tmab has units J m−3 in the stated length-coordinate convention. Their physical meanings are fixed only after a constitutive branch is selected:

  • For charged dust, Tmab=ρUaUb and ja=σUa. Here ρ≥0 is rest-mass density, not energy density.
  • For a perfect fluid, Tmab=(ϵ+p)UaUb/c2+pgab. Its rest-frame entries are (ϵ,p,p,p). No equation of state is included by this tensor definition.
  • An optional conducting-fluid current is ja=σUa+qa, where qaUa=0 and qa is a rest-space conduction-current density in A m−2. The separate constitutive choice qa=χEUa uses a scalar conductivity χ≥0 in S m−1 and is not part of the general definition.

For a smooth real electromagnetic two-form F and positive μ0, define the electromagnetic stress by

TEMab:=1μ0(FacFbc−14gabFcdFcd),TabEM:=gacgbdTEMcd.

The components of F in an orthonormal tetrad have tesla units. For an observer n, the observer electric field is Ena:=cFabnb in V m−1; with U=cn, write EUa:=FabUb=Ena. The observer magnetic field is the spatial covector Bn,a:=−(⋆gF)abnb in tesla, with the orientation and Hodge convention of Einstein–Maxwell primitive quantities and SI conventions. These observer fields depend on n; they are not global observer-independent three-vectors.

Define the matter-plus-field force density by fa:=Fabjb, in N m−3, and the matter exchange equation by ∇aTmab=fb. This equation is a condition of a selected coupled model, not a consequence of the tensor definitions alone. For any unit observer n, define the measured energy density of a symmetric stress tensor Tab by En:=Tabnanb in J m−3. Define its spatial energy-current vector by Sna:=−hnacTcbnb, where hnab=δab+nanb projects to n⊥; its orthonormal-frame physical energy flux is cSni in W m−2. These contractions are derived, observer-dependent quantities.

Within the selected Einstein–Maxwell formulation, the fields g and F may be dynamical unknowns in a coupled branch or prescribed data in a test branch. The matter variables ρ,σ,ϵ,p and any chosen conductivity or equation of state are independent constitutive input. The current, stress, force density, electromagnetic stress, observer fields and observer contractions are derived from those inputs by the displayed definitions. This definition makes no identification with Newtonian or thermodynamic quantities solely because units agree; it records no measurement and asserts no matter evolution, entropy law, or coupled Einstein–Maxwell solution.

PostulateStatement: AI-adaptedProof: Not applicableOpen item page →

Selected transported charged-dust Einstein–Maxwell model

Physical scope

A selected smooth charged-dust continuum with one four-velocity field U on its stated domain in the equation-based Einstein–Maxwell model. It adopts the dust stress/current closure, undivided mass and force equations, and charge conservation; the ratio is transported only on positive-density domains. It makes no coupled PDE existence claim and asserts neither a global smooth continuation nor single-velocity validity beyond the stated domain; singular particles and empirical validity are outside scope.

Postulate

On an open region Ω of the smooth oriented, time-oriented Lorentzian spacetime and SI conventions of Smooth matter quantities, current and observer observables, adopt the equation-based Einstein and smooth curved Maxwell systems of Equation-based Einstein–Maxwell model and Smooth curved vacuum Maxwell constitutive adoption, with the smooth matter quantities and electromagnetic stress of Smooth matter quantities, current and observer observables. Thus the coupled branch includes the adopted Einstein equation Gab+Λgab=(8πGN/c4)(Tm,ab+TabEM) and Maxwell equations dF=0, ∇aFab=−μ0jb, using the fixed local SI signs, units and curvature convention of those suppliers. Their adopted equations remain physical assumptions; neither is deduced here from flat spacetime, variational stationarity, or mathematical structure.

Choose smooth ρ,σ,U on Ω, with ρ≥0, U future timelike, g(U,U)=−c2, and σ=0 wherever ρ=0. Select the pressureless dust closure

Tmab=ρUaUb,ja=σUa.

As the matter model, adopt the undivided smooth mass and Lorentz-force equations

∇a(ρUa)=0,ρUa∇aUb=σFbcUc,

and charge-current conservation ∇aja=0. On each open region Ω+:={p∈Ω:ρ(p)>0} define α:=σ/ρ. Under the adopted mass continuity and charged-dust forms, Charged dust balance equivalence and advected charge ratio gives the exact equivalence between charge-current conservation and transport Ua∇aα=0. The ratio is not defined and no division is made on ρ=0. This ratio statement is restricted to Ω+; no global coupled evolution theorem is asserted.

This is a selected classical pressureless continuum model with one four-velocity field U on the stated smooth domain. It excludes viscosity, conduction, multistream averaging, spin, point sources, self-field products and a general dust action. The finely fixed charge-to-mass ratio used in the specific ECD solutions of Meinel and Hütten is not a law of this general model. The postulate asserts neither a global smooth continuation nor validity of a single-velocity description beyond the stated domain; it makes no coupled-solution existence, uniqueness, stability, or empirical claim.

PostulateStatement: AI-adaptedProof: Not applicableOpen item page →

Selected charged perfect-fluid exchange/Ohmic branch

Physical scope

A selected smooth positive-rest-energy perfect-fluid domain coupled through the adopted Einstein–Maxwell equations and matter exchange. The current is either convective or uses a separately selected smooth Ohmic conduction branch. It asserts no global fluid or conducting-fluid evolution, entropy law, or empirical validity.

Postulate

On a smooth open state domain Ω in the spacetime and SI conventions of Smooth matter quantities, current and observer observables, choose C1 rest-energy density ϵ>0, pressure p, rest-charge density σ, and a C2 future-timelike field U with g(U,U)=−c2. The equation-based coupled branch uses Equation-based Einstein–Maxwell model and Smooth curved vacuum Maxwell constitutive adoption with a smooth symmetric matter tensor and current supplied by this selected fluid model. Adopt the perfect-fluid tensor

Tmab=ϵ+pc2UaUb+pgab

and either the convective current ja=σUa or a separately specified conduction current ja=σUa+qa with qaUa=0. Adopt charge continuity ∇aja=0 and the local matter-exchange balance ∇aTmab=Fbcjc. The fields and derivatives are smooth enough for these equations to hold pointwise.

For an optional Ohmic branch, choose a smooth scalar conductivity χ≥0 in S m−1 and impose qa=χEUa, where EUa=FabUb is the rest-frame electric field in V m−1. This is a separate constitutive adoption, not a consequence of covariance or of the Maxwell equations. A smooth equation of state may be supplied on the chosen local state domain; no particular function, relativistic entropy law, causality assertion, or thermodynamic interpretation of ϵ,p is included here. The stress-projection and comoving work identities follow conditionally from Perfect-fluid exchange projections and conduction heating, but no global fluid or conducting-fluid solution theory is asserted.

This postulate adopts a local classical matter branch. It does not presume an unspecified matter action or infer empirical validity from the source literature.

Physics theoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)Open item page →

Dust continuity, transport and Lorentz acceleration

Physical scope

A conditional local stress/current balance reduction for the selected smooth charged-dust continuum on an open positive-density region. It identifies the exact mass-continuity, charge-transport and Lorentz-force equations and asserts no coupled PDE existence or behavior at zero density.

Statement

Let Ω+⊆Ω be an open positive-density region of the charged-dust model in Selected transported charged-dust Einstein–Maxwell model. Let ρ,σ∈C1(Ω+,R) with ρ>0, let U∈C2(Ω+,TΩ+) be future timelike with g(U,U)=−c2, and let the smooth electromagnetic two-form and metric be those of that model. Set ab:=Ua∇aUb, Tmab:=ρUaUb, and ja:=σUa.

On Ω+ the adopted charged-dust matter-exchange equation ∇aTmab=Fbcjc is equivalent to

∇a(ρUa)=0,ρab=σFbcUc.

Under the mass-continuity equation, ∇aja=0 is equivalent to transport of the charge-to-mass ratio α:=σ/ρ along the flow, Ua∇aα=0. These are model deductions on Ω+; the ratio and the divided force law are not defined at zero density. The result is local to its stated smooth positive-density domain and asserts neither a global smooth continuation nor validity of the single-velocity model beyond that domain. It supplies no Maxwell or Einstein solution or coupled-field existence theorem.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The smooth fields, regularity, normalization, dust closure and positive-density domain in the Statement, together with the selected physical branch and the exact mathematical supplier below.

[A1]

Selected transported charged-dust Einstein–Maxwell model: the selected model uses Tmab=ρUaUb, ja=σUa, the undivided mass and Lorentz-force equations, and charge-current conservation; on ρ>0 it uses α=σ/ρ.

[F1]

Charged dust balance equivalence and advected charge ratio: for ρ>0, C1 real ρ,σ, and C2 future timelike U with g(U,U)=−c2, its stated stress-exchange implication and its charge-conservation/transport equivalence under continuity apply. The stress-exchange implication assumes the exchange equation, so step 1.1 proves the converse directly. This current supplier is a draft result and is used only at these stated interfaces.

Proof

1.1A1F1givenalgebra

The physical fields in [A1] have the regularity, positive-density domain, normalization, dust stress and current required by [F1]. If the stress-exchange equation holds, the stated implication in [F1] gives mass continuity and the Lorentz-force equation. Conversely, the product rule gives ∇aTmab=Ub∇a(ρUa)+ρab; if mass continuity and the Lorentz-force equation hold, this equals σFbcUc=Fbcjc, recovering stress exchange. Hence the two directions of the equivalence hold on Ω+, with division used only there.

2.1A1F1step 1.1algebra∎

Under the mass-continuity equation from step 1.1, the current-conservation clause of [F1] applies to ja=σUa and α=σ/ρ, giving ∇aja=0 exactly when Ua∇aα=0. The equivalence is only along U and imposes no transverse constancy; neither statement is extended to ρ=0.

Physics theoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)Open item page →

Convective/Ohmic comoving mechanical work prediction

Physical scope

A conditional local energy and pressure-force projection for the selected smooth charged perfect fluid. Comoving electromagnetic work is zero for the convective current and is nonnegative for the separately adopted smooth Ohmic law. This is a mechanical balance, not an entropy theorem or global fluid solution.

Statement

Let Ω be a smooth open state domain of Selected charged perfect-fluid exchange/Ohmic branch. Assume ϵ,p,σ∈C1(Ω,R), U∈C2(Ω,TΩ) is future timelike with g(U,U)=−c2, F is a smooth electromagnetic two-form, and the matter stress and current satisfy the selected fluid closure and exchange equation. Define

D:=Ua∇a,θ:=∇aUa,ab:=DUb,hbc:=δbc+UbUcc2,fb:=Fbcjc,EUa:=FabUb.

Then the longitudinal work and rest-space force equations are

Dϵ+(ϵ+p)θ=−Ubfb,ϵ+pc2ab+hba∇ap=hbcfc.

For the convective branch ja=σUa, the comoving electromagnetic work −Ubfb is zero. For the optional smooth Ohmic branch ja=σUa+qa, qa=χEUa, with χ≥0, it is

−Ubfb=χ g(EU,EU)≥0.

Here EU is the rest-frame electric field and the induced metric on U⊥ is positive definite. This is a conditional mechanical energy identity; it does not assert an entropy-production law, equation-of-state evolution, causal constitutive theory, or fluid existence.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The regularity, timelike normalization, perfect-fluid stress, selected current, smooth electromagnetic field and matter-exchange equation in the Statement.

[A1]

Selected charged perfect-fluid exchange/Ohmic branch: the selected smooth model adopts Tmab=(ϵ+p)UaUb/c2+pgab and ∇aTmab=Fbcjc, with either ja=σUa or the separately specified smooth conduction current ja=σUa+qa and qaUa=0.

[F1]

Perfect-fluid exchange projections and conduction heating: for these C1 fluid scalars, C2 unit-normalized U, and the exchange equation, the two displayed projections are equivalent to the full tensor balance; if qa=χEUa with χ≥0, then −Ubfb=χg(EU,EU)≥0, while q=0 gives zero work. This is a draft mathematical supplier and is used only at its exact current statement.

Proof

1.1A1F1given

The physical stress, current, smoothness and normalization in [A1] match the hypotheses of [F1]. Applying its projection identity to ∇aTmab=fb gives the stated longitudinal energy equation and orthogonal pressure/acceleration equation, with no equation-of-state or entropy premise.

2.1A1F1step 1.1algebra∎

For ja=σUa, antisymmetry of Fab gives UbFbcUc=0. For ja=σUa+qa, the same antisymmetry gives −UbFbcqc=EU,cqc. Under the optional law qa=χEUa, this equals χg(EU,EU)≥0 because χ≥0 and U⊥ is positive definite; hence the two stated work branches follow.

Physics theoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)Open item page →

Selected total-stress/Killing charges

Physical scope

Conditional total-stress conservation and finite-domain Killing flux for the selected smooth charged-dust Einstein–Maxwell branch, plus the local gauge-compensated first integral for a separate prescribed-field charged test body. Finite-chain side flux and local-potential conditions are retained; no gravitational-field energy, global charge, self-field, or global trajectory claim is made. The probe branch carries ACω through the published RPM action-equivalence result.

Statement

Let Ω+ be a smooth positive-density region of the selected charged-dust model, and require F,j,Tm to satisfy the smoothness hypotheses of the Maxwell-stress and Killing-current suppliers. Assume the dust fields satisfy the model equations and the conditional matter-exchange identity of Dust continuity, transport and Lorentz acceleration, and assume the smooth Maxwell equations of Smooth curved vacuum Maxwell constitutive adoption. Define Ttotab:=Tmab+TEMab. Let ξ be a smooth Killing field on Ω+, meaning Lξg=0, and set Jξa:=Ttotabξb. For any finite smooth singular 4-chain C in Ω+ with boundary ∂C=Σ2−Σ1+B, define Qξ(Σ):=∫ΣιJξvolg. Then

∇aTtotab=0,∇aJξa=0,Qξ(Σ2)−Qξ(Σ1)=−Qξ(B).

The two slice charges are equal only when the side flux Qξ(B) vanishes. This is a matter-plus-electromagnetic stress current, not a local gravitational-energy tensor; no asymptotic or universal global energy is asserted.

There is also the following separate test-body clause. Assume ACω for the canonical tangent-bundle smooth structure. On a local potential domain V⊆Ω+, let A be a supplied smooth one-form with F=dA and let χ be a smooth scalar such that LξA=dχ. Let z:[a,b]→V be a finite C2 future-timelike curve segment, parameterized by proper time τ, with fixed-endpoint variations as in External-field charged-particle action. If the segment is stationary for that adopted action, then Stationary charged action and Lorentz force gives m∇UU=qF♯(U) for its constant m>0, q∈R, and U=dz/dτ. Consequently

Cξ:=m g(U,ξ)+q(A(ξ)−χ)

is constant along the segment and is invariant under A↦A+dλ, χ↦χ+Lξλ. This conditional test-body identity uses no self-field, global potential, trajectory-existence, or Einstein-solution claim.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The smooth Einstein–Maxwell dust branch, positive-density domain, Killing field, finite-chain boundary and side-flux hypotheses in the first clause; and, separately, the local potential, symmetry compensator, finite fixed-endpoint test-body segment and ACω hypothesis in the second clause.

[A1]

Selected transported charged-dust Einstein–Maxwell model: the selected branch adopts Tmab=ρUaUb, ja=σUa, smooth Maxwell fields, and the undivided dust equations on a positive-density region.

[A2]

Smooth curved vacuum Maxwell constitutive adoption: on the smooth oriented Lorentzian domain the adopted field law is dF=0 and ∇aFab=−μ0jb with the selected SI sign.

[L1]

Dust continuity, transport and Lorentz acceleration: on ρ>0, the adopted dust equations give the exact matter-exchange identity ∇aTmab=Fbcjc.

[F1]

Curved electromagnetic stress divergence: for smooth F,j, μ0>0, dF=0, and ∇aFab=−μ0jb, the electromagnetic tensor obeys ∇aTEMab=−Fbcjc. Its current proof and mathematical dependencies remain draft material, so this use is conditional.

[F2]

Killing exchange current and gauge-compensated charged first integral: under the smooth Maxwell equations and matter exchange, a symmetric total stress gives a divergence-free Killing current, the finite-chain side-flux balance, and, for a local potential and Lorentz-force test curve with LξA=dχ, the stated gauge-compensated constant.

[F3]

Charged and spinning test-body quantities: the test body has constant m>0, constant charge q, a C2 future-timelike worldline parameterized by proper time, and a prescribed field with a local potential where used.

[A3]

External-field charged-particle action: on a finite local-potential segment, the adopted model trajectories are stationary points of the displayed fixed-endpoint external-field action.

[F4]

Stationary charged action and Lorentz force: under that postulate, the charged-body definitions, finite-variation hypotheses and ACω, stationarity is equivalent to m∇UU=qF♯(U). This published supplier is used only at its stated finite-segment interface.

[A4]

The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω): assume the Axiom of Countable Choice ACω for the canonical tangent-bundle smooth structure; the test-body clause uses it through [F4].

Proof

1.1A1A2L1F1algebra

By [A1], [A2] and the local result [L1], the dust model gives ∇aTmab=Fbcjc on Ω+. The adopted Maxwell equations in [A1] match the smoothness and source-sign hypotheses of [F1], which gives ∇aTEMab=−Fbcjc. Raising/lowering with g identifies these force-density terms with opposite signs, so adding the two identities yields ∇aTtotab=0.

1.2A3F2F3F4A4given

Under [A3], the finite proper-time segment and charged-body quantities satisfy [F3] and [A3]; therefore [F4] supplies the Lorentz-force equation required by [F2]. No new trajectory is constructed.

2.1F2step 1.1given

The total stress is symmetric as the sum of symmetric matter and electromagnetic tensors. The Killing-field and finite-chain hypotheses in the first clause match [F2], so its current conclusion gives ∇aJξa=0 and its boundary formula gives Qξ(Σ2)−Qξ(Σ1)=−Qξ(B). Equality follows only when the specified side flux is zero.

3.1F2step 1.2given∎

Apply the local test-body clause of [F2] to the equation from step 1.2 and the supplied F=dA, LξA=dχ. It gives constancy and gauge invariance of Cξ on the segment. The result remains conditional on the local potential, symmetry and finite-segment hypotheses.

Physics theoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passOpen item page →

Observer energy conditions for selected matter plus EM

Physical scope

Pointwise observer interpretation of the selected smooth electromagnetic, charged-dust and perfect-fluid stress tensors. Electromagnetic and nonnegative-dust energy conditions are conditional tensor deductions; perfect-fluid conclusions require the exact stated inequalities. No general matter positivity or empirical claim is made.

Statement

Use the smooth electromagnetic stress, observer contractions and selected matter tensors of Smooth matter quantities, current and observer observables, with μ0>0 and a future unit observer n. The electromagnetic tensor is symmetric and trace-free, and it satisfies WEC, NEC, SEC and DEC. In a positively oriented orthonormal rest tetrad, with the cross product taken in the oriented Euclidean rest space, its energy density and spatial energy-current components are

u=ϵ0∣En∣2+∣Bn∣2/μ02,Sn=En×Bnμ0c.

For charged dust with ρ≥0, the matter tensor and its sum with the electromagnetic tensor satisfy all four conditions. For a selected perfect-fluid tensor with rest energy density ϵ and pressure p, the exact pointwise conditions on the matter tensor are

WEC  ⟺  ϵ≥0 and ϵ+p≥0,NEC  ⟺  ϵ+p≥0,

SEC  ⟺  ϵ+p≥0 and ϵ+3p≥0,DEC  ⟺  ϵ≥∣p∣.

If the perfect-fluid tensor satisfies any one of these conditions, adding the electromagnetic tensor preserves that condition. The inequalities are not assumed universally, and adding the electromagnetic tensor to arbitrary matter need not repair a violated condition.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The smooth Lorentzian metric, positive μ0, observer, electromagnetic field and selected dust or perfect-fluid tensors in the Statement.

[F1]

Smooth matter quantities, current and observer observables: TEMab=μ0−1(FacFbc−14gabFcdFcd), F0i=−Ei/c, Fij=ϵijkBk, and the dust and perfect-fluid matter tensor definitions.

[F2]

EM, dust and perfect-fluid energy inequalities: the electromagnetic tensor satisfies WEC, NEC, SEC and DEC with rest-frame density u=(∣E∣2/c2+∣B∣2)/(2μ0) and energy flux (E×B)/(μ0c); dust with ρ≥0 satisfies all four; the displayed perfect-fluid inequalities are exact; sums preserve each satisfied condition. This draft mathematical proof is used only at its stated algebraic interface.

[A1]

The dust branch, when used, assumes ρ≥0. No sign restriction is added to ϵ or p except when a particular perfect-fluid condition is asserted.

Proof

1.1F1F2A1given

The definitions in [F1] fix the electromagnetic stress and observer convention. The mathematical component and cone argument [F2] establishes its symmetry, trace, observer density and flux, and all four energy conditions. The same supplier gives the exact inequalities for the selected dust and perfect-fluid tensors under [A1].

2.1F2step 1.1algebra∎

At each point, [F2] proves the future-causal cone and each quadratic condition are preserved under addition of tensors that satisfy the same condition. Therefore nonnegative dust plus the electromagnetic tensor satisfies all four; a perfect-fluid sum satisfies each condition asserted only when the corresponding listed fluid inequalities hold. No conclusion is made for an arbitrary matter tensor.

5 · Examples, experiments and counterexamples

None yet.

Sources