Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

✓ 3 results · all verified · 3 also independently AI-judged
Every result on this page is machine-checked by a proof checker and read in full and owner-audited; the judge is an additional, independent cross-model AI review of the proofs; all 3 also cleared it.

Sl2 R Principal and Complementary Series — Examples

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

These examples accompany sl2-r-principal-and-complementary-series. They compute explicit Iwasawa coordinates and Haar density, tabulate the first even and odd K-types and their ladder arrows, and evaluate initial intertwiner eigenvalue ratios in the spherical complementary range. The counterexample exhibits the loss of positivity beyond the unitary interval.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

None yet.

5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)audited 2026-10-08Open item page →

Iwasawa coordinates and Haar density on SL2(R)

Example

Assume AC and use the Iwasawa coordinates of Iwasawa and minimal-parabolic data for SL2(R) and Iwasawa decomposition and Haar integration formula for SL2(R). For a generic g=(prqs)∈SL2(R), compute k(g),a(g),n(g) and the Haar density. Check the left-translation cocycle for g0=au and g0=kϕ, and evaluate the Haar integral on a compactly supported test function near the identity.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, g∈SL2(R), and real u,ϕ.

[F1]

For g=(prqs), the coordinates are a=p2+q2, k=a−1(p−qqp), x=(pr+qs)/a2, and a=et/2 (Iwasawa decomposition and Haar integration formula for SL2(R)).

[F2]

In these coordinates the left Haar integral is ∫K∫R∫Rf(katnx)et dx dt dk (Iwasawa decomposition and Haar integration formula for SL2(R)).

[F3]

The angle parameter kθ identifies K with the additive circle R/2πZ, and kθ↦[θ/(2π)] is a group isomorphism to T=R/Z (Iwasawa and minimal-parabolic data for SL2(R)).

[F4]

The normalized torus measure mT is translation-invariant and given by Lebesgue measure on the fundamental interval [0,1) (The one-dimensional torus and its normalized Haar integral). Both mT and the pushforward of dk under [F3] are normalized Haar probabilities, so they agree by uniqueness on compact groups (Normalized Haar probability on a compact group).

[F5]

For a C1 diffeomorphism T:U→V between Euclidean open sets and f∈Cc(V), ∫Vf(y) dy=∫Uf(T(x))∣det⁡DT(x)∣ dx (The published Riemann change-of-variables theorem already gives the Lebesgue formula for continuous compactly supported integrands).

[A1]

AC supplies normalized Haar measure and is the hypothesis of the Iwasawa Haar formula; the explicit coordinates and test function require no selection (The Axiom of Choice).

[A2]

AC implies the countable-choice hypothesis of the torus integral supplier (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1F1algebra

The first column (p,q)T is nonzero because ps−qr=1. Put a=p2+q2>0, t=2log⁡a, k(g)=a−1(p−qqp), and x=(pr+qs)/a2. Then k(g)∈K, a(g)=diag⁡(a,a−1)=at, and n(g)=nx. Direct multiplication gives k(g)a(g)n(g)=(ppx−q/a2qqx+p/a2). Its top-right entry is r because px−q/a2−r=q(ps−qr−1)/a2=0; its bottom-right entry is s because qx+p/a2−s=p(1−ps+qr)/a2=0. Thus the factors multiply to g, and uniqueness in [F1] makes them its Iwasawa coordinates. For g∗=(2111), these formulas give a=5, t=log⁡5, x=3/5, and k=5−1/2(2−112), whose product is g∗.

1.2F1F3algebra

For left multiplication by au, the first column of aukθ has squared norm Du(θ)=eucos⁡2θ+e−usin⁡2θ. Its Iwasawa factors therefore have t1=u1(θ)=log⁡Du(θ), x1=vu(θ)=(eu−e−u)sin⁡θcos⁡θDu(θ), and kθ1 with cos⁡θ1=eu/2cos⁡θ/Du(θ) and sin⁡θ1=e−u/2sin⁡θ/Du(θ). Hence aukθ=kθ1au1(θ)nvu(θ). Differentiating this circle map gives dθ1dθ=e−ucos⁡2θ+e−2usin⁡2θ=Du(θ)−1=e−u1(θ)>0, including at cos⁡θ=0.

1.3F1F3algebra

For g0=kϕ, one has kϕkθ=kθ+ϕ, so the AN factor is the identity (t1=x1=0) and the K coordinate is translated by ϕ. Thus the two requested left-translation cocycles are au1(θ)nvu(θ) and I, respectively.

1.4A1A2F2F4algebra

Fix 0<η<1/2 and put ψη(z)=max⁡(1−∣z∣/η,0). Using the representative z∈(−1/2,1/2] of the torus coordinate in [F3], define fη(k2πzatnx)=ψη(z)ψη(t)ψη(x). The function vanishes near the angular coordinate cut and has compact support in an arbitrarily small coordinate neighborhood of the identity as η↓0. By [F2] and [F4], its Haar integral factors as (∫Tψη dmT)(∫−ηηetψη(t) dt)(∫−ηηψη(x) dx). The torus factor is ∫0η(1−z/η) dz+∫1−η1(1−(1−z)/η) dz=η, and the x factor is η. The middle factor is 2∫0η(1−t/η)cosh⁡t dt=2(sinh⁡η−ηsinh⁡η−cosh⁡η+1η)=2(cosh⁡η−1)/η. Therefore ∫Gfη(g) dg=2η(cosh⁡η−1).

2.1A1A2F2F4F5step 1.2step 1.3step 1.4algebra∎

Write ξ=[θ/(2π)]∈T, so dk=dmT by [F4]. For a general coordinate k2πξatnx, left translation by au has map (ξ,t,x)↦(ξ1,t+u1(2πξ),x+e−tvu(2πξ)), since nvat=atne−tv, where ξ1=[θ1(2πξ)/(2π)]. Its Jacobian is triangular with determinant dξ1/dξ=dθ1/dθ=e−u1(2πξ)>0; the Haar weight changes to et+u1(2πξ), so the density et dk dt dx is preserved. The pullback calculation and [F5], applied on circle coordinate charts containing the compact support of fη and its translate, show that its integral is unchanged. Left translation by kϕ sends ξ to ξ+ϕ/(2π) and leaves t,x fixed, which preserves dk and the density by [F4]; [F5] gives the same integral identity. Thus both computed cocycles agree with the left invariance of the Haar formula [F2].

ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)audited 2026-10-08Open item page →

First K-types and ladder coefficients in I(epsilon, nu)

Example

Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Tabulate the K-types f−3,…,f3 of I0,ν and of I1,ν and the values of the raising and lowering operators LE±fn=1+ν±n2fn±2 on them, and check that for ν=n∈Wε the coefficient at the expected K-type vanishes.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, ε∈{0,1}, ν∈C, and the K-type decomposition and ladder operators.

[F1]

fn(kθ)=einθ is a K-type exactly for n≡ε(mod2), and these are all K-types (K-type decomposition of the SL2(R) principal series).

[F2]

LWfn=nfn and LE±fn=1+ν±n2fn±2, with LE−fn=0 exactly when ν=n−1 and LE+fn=0 exactly when ν=−(n+1) (Derived action and raising/lowering formulas in the compact picture).

[F3]

W0 is the odd integers and W1 is the even integers (The normalized principal series I(epsilon, nu)).

[A1]

AC is inherited through the principal-series and ladder suppliers; this explicit tabulation uses no additional choice (The Axiom of Choice).

Verification

technique · substitute each parity-allowed weight into [F2]

For the K-types in the requested range, the table is:

εnLWfnLE+fnLE−fn
0−2−2f−2ν−12f0ν+32f−4
0001+ν2f21+ν2f−2
022f2ν+32f4ν−12f0
1−3−3f−3ν−22f−1ν+42f−5
1−1−f−1ν2f1ν+22f−3
11f1ν+22f3ν2f−1
133f3ν+42f5ν−22f1
1.1F1F2A1algebra

For ε=0, the only indices in {−3,−2,…,3} with the required parity are −2,0,2; for ε=1 they are −3,−1,1,3. Applying the three formulas in [F2] to these indices gives every entry of the table, and [F1] shows that the table omits no K-type in the requested range.

2.1F2F3step 1.1algebra∎

Let m∈Wε with m≥0; m=0 occurs only for odd parity. At ν=m, [F2] gives LE−fm+1=0 and LE+f−m−1=0, since their coefficients are respectively (1+m−(m+1))/2 and (1+m+(−m−1))/2. At ν=−m, it gives LE−f1−m=0 and LE+fm−1=0, since both coefficients are zero. When m=0, these parameter cases coincide and the table shows LE−f1=LE+f−1=0 at ε=1,ν=0. For the other exceptional values visible in the table, m=1 in even parity and m=2 in odd parity: the positive parameter zeros occur at f±2 and f±3, respectively, and the negative parameter zeros occur at f0 and f±1. These are exactly the boundary arrows expected from the exceptional K-type strings; no parity class is identified with the other.

Remarks

Kerr's formula (2.6) gives the same raising and lowering coefficients in the right-translation basis used here. Etingof's §9.1 formulas (4)–(5) use an abstractly normalized weight basis, so they serve as a convention check rather than a literal coefficient-by-coefficient table source. The table above is computed directly from the local ladder formulas.

ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)audited 2026-10-08Open item page →

Intertwiner eigenvalues in the spherical complementary range

Example

Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice) and work in spherical parity. At regular real parameters the first normalized eigenvalues of the standard intertwiner are c^0(ν)=1, c^±2(ν)=1−ν1+ν, and c^±4(ν)=(1−ν)(3−ν)(1+ν)(3+ν); the normalized values at ν=0 are given by regular continuation. They are positive for ∣ν∣<1. At ν=(1+3)/2=2, c^2(2)=−1/3≠0; the coefficient is positive on (−1,1), zero at 1, and negative throughout (1,3).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, the spherical parity ε=0, and the normalized meromorphic eigenvalues of the standard intertwiner.

[F1]

The even K-type eigenvalues satisfy the cross-multiplied recurrence (2j+1+ν)c2j+2=(2j+1−ν)c2j and the symmetry c−2j=c2j. These identities continue meromorphically, and at regular parameters dividing by the base scalar gives the recurrence for c^2j=c2j/c0 with c^0=1 (K-type eigenvalues of A(nu): recurrence, closed form and nonvanishing, The standard intertwining operator A(nu)).

[F2]

The normalized spherical weights are c^±2j(ν)=∏l=1j(2l−1−ν)/(2l−1+ν) whenever regular. On (−1,1) every weight is regular, including the normalized meromorphic continuation at ν=0 (Unitarity of the complementary series).

[A1]

AC supplies the normalized Haar measure on K used by the principal-series and complementary-form setup; through AC⇒ACω it also supplies the countable-choice hypotheses used in deriving the recurrence and Fourier-form suppliers. The finite recurrence iteration and sign checks make no further choice (The Axiom of Choice).

Verification

technique · iterate the even-parity eigenvalue recurrence and inspect the signs of its first factors
1.1F1F2algebra

Normalize the meromorphic recurrence in [F1] by its base scalar wherever the quotient is initially regular. The j=0 and j=1 instances give c^2=(1−ν)/(1+ν) and c^4=c^2(3−ν)/(3+ν)=(1−ν)(3−ν)/((1+ν)(3+ν)). The negative-index symmetry gives c^−2=c^2 and c^−4=c^4. These ratios extend meromorphically; [F2] identifies their regular values at ν=0 and agrees with the displayed products.

1.2F1F2algebra

If ∣ν∣<1, then for every l≥1 both 2l−1−ν and 2l−1+ν are positive. Thus c^0=1, c^±2>0, and c^±4>0 throughout the open interval, including ν=0. More generally every factor in the finite product for any fixed even K-type is positive there.

1.3F1F2algebra

On 1<ν<3, the numerator 1−ν is negative and the denominator 1+ν positive, so c^2(ν)<0; at the midpoint ν=(1+3)/2=2 its value is −1/3≠0. On −1<ν<1 the coefficient is positive, and it vanishes at ν=1, so its sign changes at that endpoint.

2.1A1given∎

AC enters through the normalized Haar construction and the countable-choice hypotheses of the cited suppliers described in [A1]; this finite computation makes no additional selection.

CounterexampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)audited 2026-10-08Open item page →

The complementary form loses positivity beyond the unitary interval

Statement refuted

Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). For every real ν≥1, the normalized spherical invariant form Bν on the full even K-finite principal-series module I0,νK is positive definite.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, the spherical compact-picture principal series and its normalized invariant form, and the allowed even K-types fn(kθ)=einθ.

[F1]

In spherical parity a0(ν)=1 and (1+ν)a2(ν)=(1−ν)a0(ν) whenever the quotient is regular; f0,f2 are distinct nonzero K-type vectors (K-type eigenvalues of A(nu): recurrence, closed form and nonvanishing, K-type decomposition of the SL2(R) principal series).

[F2]

For every real ν except negative odd integers, Bν is a finite continuous G-invariant form with Fourier weights a0=1 and a±2j=∏l=1j(2l−1−ν)/(2l−1+ν). At ν=1, every nonzero even weight vanishes (Unitarity of the complementary series).

[A1]

AC is declared by the principal-series and invariant-form constructions and supplies the normalized Haar setup; the two coefficient evaluations here make no further choice (The Axiom of Choice).

Counterexample

Use the normalized spherical form from [F2]; the parameter ν=3 is regular and the endpoint ν=1 gives a separate degeneracy witness.

1.1F1F2A1algebra

At ν=3, the normalized weights are finite. By [F1], a0(3)=1 and 4a2(3)=−2a0(3), so a2(3)=−1/2. Thus B3(f0,f0)=1>0 and B3(f2,f2)=−1/2<0: this regular invariant form is indefinite and refutes positive definiteness. The parameter 3 is a reducibility point, but regularity of the normalized form does not require irreducibility.

2.1F2A1step 1.1algebra∎

At ν=1, [F2] gives a0=1 and a2=0. Hence B1(f0,f0)=1, while B1(f2,h)=0 for every smooth h by the Fourier-diagonal formula; f2≠0, so the endpoint form is nonzero and degenerate. This also contradicts the refuted claim at its boundary and confirms that the positive-definite range ∣ν∣<1 is strict.

Sources