How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Algebraic Group Actions, Orbits, Stabilizers, and Controlled Quotients — Examples
1 · Prerequisites
- Abelian Categories
- Adjunctions Units and Counits
- Affine Algebraic Sets and Coordinate Rings
- Affine Group Schemes, Hopf Algebras, and Rational Representations
- Affine Schemes and the Structure Sheaf
- Algebraic Closure, Embeddings, and Separability
- Algebraic Differentials Separability and Smooth Local Presentations
- Algebraic Extensions, Extension Degree, and Finite Fields
- Algebraic Group Actions, Orbits, Stabilizers, and Controlled Quotients
- Artinian Rings and Length
- Associated Primes and Primary Decomposition
- Binary Operations, Monoids, Groups and Subgroups
- Cardinal Arithmetic, Cofinality and the Alephs
- Cartier and Weil Divisors Line Bundles and Picard Groups
- Categories, Functors and Natural Transformations
- Chain Complexes and Homology
- Chain Conditions, Semisimple Modules and the Wedderburn–Artin Theorem
- Chain Homotopy and the Homotopy Category
- Classical Affine Varieties: Coordinate Rings, Morphisms, and Rational Maps
- Cohomology of Quasi Coherent Sheaves on Affine and Projective Schemes
- Combinatorial Classes and the Symbolic Method
- Compactness
- Compactness in Metric Spaces
- Congruences, the Integers Modulo n and the Chinese Remainder Theorem
- Connectedness
- Construction of the Natural Numbers
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Cauchy Sequences
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Dedekind Cuts
- Cosets, Index and Lagrange's Theorem
- Countability and Uncountability
- Cyclic Groups and Direct Products
- Dedekind Domains and Ideal Classes
- Delta Functors and Universality
- Depth and Cohen Macaulay Modules
- Derived Categories
- Derived Functors
- Determinants of Matrices over a Commutative Ring
- Diagonalisation and the Minimal Polynomial
- Diagonals Separated Morphisms and Valuative Uniqueness
- Dimension Constructible Images and Dimensions of Fibres
- Divisibility, Euclidean Domains, Principal Ideal Domains and Unique Factorisation
- Divisibility, Greatest Common Divisors and Bézout's Identity
- Double Complexes Exact Couples and Convergence
- Eigenvalues, Eigenvectors and the Characteristic Polynomial
- Exactness and the Member Calculus
- Ext and Balanced Resolutions
- Fibre Products Base Change and Scheme Theoretic Fibres
- Finite Counting, Factorials and Binomial Coefficients
- Finite Fields and Cyclotomic Extensions
- Finite Proper and Projective Morphisms
- Flat Smooth and Etale Morphisms
- Flatness and Faithful Flatness
- Formal Power Series
- Foundations of the Real Numbers for Analysis
- Free Modules, Exact Sequences, Projective and Injective Modules
- Group Actions, Orbits, Stabilisers and Cayley's Theorem
- Group Homomorphisms and the Isomorphism Theorems
- Group Schemes of Finite Type over a Field
- Homogeneous Resultants and Projective Intersection Length
- Ideals, Quotient Rings and the Isomorphism Theorems for Rings
- Integral Extensions and Going Up
- Kahler Differentials Conormal Sequences and Infinitesimal Lifting
- Koszul Complexes and Regular Sequences
- Krull Dimension and Height Theorems
- Limits and Colimits
- Linear Independence, Bases and Dimension
- Linear Transformations, Rank-Nullity and Quotient Spaces
- Localisation of Modules and Support
- Long Exact Sequences in Homology
- Mapping Cones Cylinders and Chain Triangles
- Matrices, the Matrix of a Linear Map, and Change of Basis
- Metric Spaces
- Modules over a Principal Ideal Domain and the Canonical Forms
- Modules, Submodules, Quotient Modules and the Isomorphism Theorems
- Monotone Sequences, Bolzano-Weierstrass, and Cauchy Completeness
- Morphisms Local Rings and Rational Maps of Affine Varieties
- Noether Normalisation and Nullstellensatz
- Noetherian Rings and Hilbert Basis
- Nonaffine Algebraic Groups, Barsotti-Chevalley, and Abelian Varieties
- Normal Subgroups and Quotient Groups
- Order, Zorn's Lemma, and the Axiom of Choice
- Ordinal Arithmetic and the First Uncountable Ordinal
- Ordinals, Cardinals, and Transfinite Recursion
- Polynomial Rings, the Division Algorithm and Roots
- Preadditive and Additive Categories and Biproducts
- Presheaves Sheaves Stalks and Sheafification
- Prime Spectra and Radicals
- Primes, Euclid's Lemma and the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic
- Proj Projective Schemes Twisting Sheaves and Ampleness
- Projective Algebraic Sets Projective Morphisms and Cones
- Projective and Injective Resolutions
- Quasi Coherent and Coherent Sheaves and Vector Bundles
- Rees Modules Artin Rees and Hilbert Samuel Theory
- Reflective Subcategories and the Adjoint Functor Theorems
- Regular Local Rings and Homological Dimension
- Relations, Functions, and Quotients
- Rings, Subrings, Integral Domains and Fields
- Roots, Rational Powers, and Classical Inequalities
- Schemes Subschemes and Morphisms Locally of Finite Type
- Sheaf Cohomology Cech Cohomology and Comparison
- Sheaf Operations Exactness Ringed Spaces and Module Pullback
- Simple Field Extensions and the Construction of the Complex Numbers
- Smooth Proper Curves Divisors Genus and Ramification
- Splitting Fields
- Subobject Lattices Generators and the Grothendieck Axioms
- Subspaces, Products, and Quotients
- Suprema and Infima
- Symmetric Groups, Cycle Decomposition and the Sign Homomorphism
- Tensor Products of Modules
- The Determinant of a Linear Operator, Cofactors and Cramer's Rule
- The Diagram Lemmas in an Abelian Category
- The Field of Fractions and Localisation
- The Fundamental Theorem of Algebra
- The Fundamental Theorem of Finite Abelian Groups
- The Galois Correspondence
- The Holomorphic Inverse Function Theorem and Weierstrass Preparation
- The ZFC Axioms and the Basic Set Constructions
- Topological Spaces and Continuity
- Topology of ℝ
- Tor Flatness and Global Dimension
- Triangularisation, Generalised Eigenspaces and Jordan Canonical Form
- Triangulated Categories
- Universal Coefficients and Kunneth Theorems
- Universal Properties, Representables and the Yoneda Lemma
- Valuation Rings and Discrete Valuation Rings
- Vector Spaces, Linear Subspaces, Span and Direct Sums
- Yoneda Extensions and Homological Dimension
- Zariski Tangent Spaces, Regular Points, Smoothness, and Bertini
- Zariski Topology on Prime Spectra
2 · Summary
The examples test the quotient theory of algebraic-group-actions-orbits-stabilizers-and-controlled-quotients on explicit actions. The orbit set of k-points need not be the k-points of the fppf quotient sheaf takes acting on for a nonsquare : the orbit set of -points is empty, yet the quotient sheaf is represented by , so sheafification is strictly necessary and the orbit set does not compute the -points of the quotient sheaf. The quotient of GL2 by the diagonal torus is the complement of the diagonal in P1 x P1 computes the quotient of by the diagonal torus as the complement of the diagonal in , with its dimension, projection fibres and field-valued coset description.
3 · Logical flowchart
4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs
None yet.
5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements
The orbit set of k-points need not be the k-points of the fppf quotient sheaf
Statement refuted
For every finite-type -group scheme acting on a finite-type -scheme , the orbit set of -points computes the -points of the fppf quotient sheaf .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: AC inherited from the quotient-sheaf supplier; a field of characteristic containing a nonsquare (for example , ); ; and .
A group law on an affine scheme is given by comultiplication, counit and antipode maps satisfying the group-object identities, and on -points it gives a natural group structure (Group schemes of finite type over a field, Affine schemes are contravariantly equivalent to commutative rings, Affine fibre products are spectra of tensor products); a closed subscheme of a finite-type group scheme is a closed subgroup scheme exactly when its -points form a subgroup for every (Closed subgroup schemes are detected on all algebra-valued points, Morphisms and closed subgroup schemes of group schemes).
An action is a morphism satisfying the unit and associativity diagrams, and it is determined by its values on -points (Algebraic group actions, orbit maps, orbit subschemes and scheme-theoretic stabilizers). The action and second projection define the morphism (Fibre product of schemes).
A morphism locally of finite presentation is étale when it is flat and has vanishing relative differentials (Étale equals flat and unramified in finite presentation, Étale morphism of schemes). For the two algebras below, their explicit rank-two free bases also establish finiteness and local freeness; no general finite-étale module criterion is needed.
The affine finite locally free equivalence relation with an equivalence relation and invariants has finite type over , quotient finite locally free and surjective, and represents the fppf quotient sheaf (Affine finite locally free equivalence relations have finite locally free scheme quotients).
The fppf quotient sheaf is the sheafification of the naive quotient presheaf in the fppf topology, and a scheme represents it when its functor is naturally isomorphic to the sheafification (Quotient sheaves and representable quotients for pre-relations and group actions, Fibre product of schemes).
Counterexample
The algebra is a field : the polynomial has no root in because is a nonsquare, hence is irreducible of degree two, and it is separable because its derivative is nonzero as and . Thus is free of rank two over and finitely presented, and because is a unit with and is a unit; by [F3], is finite étale of degree two. A -algebra map would send to an element with , so and the orbit set is empty.
Put with comultiplication , counit and antipode , the last well defined because ; for every -algebra the set is a group under multiplication, naturally in , so by [F1] these maps make a finite-type -group scheme with these groups of points. The formula defines a natural action of on : it is associative, unital, and stays in because , so by [F2] there is a morphism with .
The morphism , , is an isomorphism. On coordinate rings it is the -algebra map with and ; in the source ring and are units with , and the assignment , defines an inverse: it respects the relations since and , and the two composites fix each generator.
The relation has and , so is the isomorphism of step 2.1, in particular an equivalence relation. The ring is free over via with basis , so is finite locally free. The involution carries to , so is finite locally free as well. The invariant ring is : for one computes and in (evaluation at ). Equality is equivalent to ; since is a unit and has components , this forces . By [F4] the quotient is represented by , so .
Consider the identity section and its class in the naive quotient presheaf of [F5]. Its two pullbacks along the projections are the first and second projections, which differ by the element : indeed , so is a -valued point, and because . Hence the two pullbacks of in agree, so the class of the identity section is a compatible family of sections of the naive presheaf over the fppf covering .
That compatible family does not descend: is empty by step 1.1, so there is no class in whose pullback along could be the class of the identity section. Therefore the naive quotient presheaf is not an fppf sheaf and is not the quotient sheaf ; since is represented by with by step 3.1, while , the orbit set does not compute the -points of the quotient sheaf. Sheafification is strictly necessary, and the quotient sheaf here is representable: the counterexample separates the orbit set from the quotient sheaf, not representability from the quotient sheaf.
The quotient of GL2 by the diagonal torus is the complement of the diagonal in P1 x P1
Example
Assume the Axiom of Choice inherited from the homogeneous-space and projective-bundle suppliers. Let be a field, let with its standard representation on (The general linear group scheme and its coordinate ring), and let be the diagonal torus, the closed subgroup scheme whose -points are the invertible diagonal matrices (Morphisms and closed subgroup schemes of group schemes, Closed subgroup schemes are detected on all algebra-valued points). (a) is a closed subgroup scheme of the smooth affine group scheme , and the fppf quotient sheaf (Quotient sheaves and representable quotients for pre-relations and group actions) is representable (Homogeneous spaces of smooth affine groups are separated schemes). (b) Let act on by the product of the actions induced on each factor by the standard representation (A linear representation induces an action on projective space with the same line stabilizers), and let . Then the stabilizer of is , the orbit is exactly the open subscheme (complement of the diagonal), and the orbit map induces an isomorphism (A faithfully flat orbit map represents the coset quotient sheaf, Fibre dimension and orbit dimension add to the dimension of the group). (c) Consequently is a smooth separated finite-type -scheme whose base change to an algebraic closure has dimension (equal to , by the orbit-stabilizer dimension identity); the morphism , , has over every point a fibre isomorphic to minus the -rational point defined by ; and for every extension field the natural map is a bijection.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: AC, a field , the group with its standard representation on , the diagonal torus , the surface with the product action, and the point .
is a group scheme of finite type with the invertible matrices, and is naturally identified with it (The general linear group scheme and its coordinate ring). Moreover is standard smooth of relative dimension over : the polynomial ring is standard smooth with the empty presentation, and is its localization at , so it is finitely presented and flat with geometrically regular fibres, hence smooth over (Standard smooth presentations and locally standard smooth maps, Standard smooth algebras are finitely presented and flat, Locally standard smooth iff flat with geometrically regular fibres, Smooth morphism of schemes). The same argument applies to every principal localization of a polynomial ring, in particular to the diagonal torus , which is standard smooth of relative dimension with the empty presentation, hence smooth, of finite type, flat and locally of finite presentation over .
A closed subscheme of a finite-type group scheme is a closed subgroup scheme exactly when its -points form a subgroup for every (Closed subgroup schemes are detected on all algebra-valued points, Morphisms and closed subgroup schemes of group schemes).
A rational representation induces an action on whose -points are rank-one locally direct summand subbundles, with action , and the scheme-theoretic stabilizer of has -points (A linear representation induces an action on projective space with the same line stabilizers, Fibres of the orbit map and the scheme-theoretic stabilizer as a closed subgroup scheme).
Representability criterion: if equalizes a pre-relation , is faithfully flat and locally of finite presentation, and is an isomorphism, then represents the fppf quotient sheaf (Criterion for a scheme to represent an fppf quotient sheaf).
For every field , is a smooth proper geometrically integral curve over , hence separated and of finite type over (Projective-line curve and divisor basics, Proper morphisms); smoothness, separatedness and finite type are stable under base change and composition, so is smooth, separated and of finite type over (Smoothness survives base change and composition, Finite type under base change and products over a field, Separatedness survives base change, Separated morphisms compose). For every smooth finite-type -scheme and every -scheme the projection is flat and locally of finite presentation, being the base change of the flat and locally finitely presented structure morphism (Smooth morphism of schemes, Flatness is stable under arbitrary base change, Local finiteness conditions under base change). A nonempty open subset of an irreducible classical variety has the same dimension (Nonempty opens preserve irreducible dimension).
Over an algebraically closed field, for a connected smooth group scheme with a closed point the orbit-stabilizer dimension identity holds (Fibre dimension and orbit dimension add to the dimension of the group).
Verification
Given: AC, the field , with its standard representation on , the diagonal torus , the product action on , and .
The closed subscheme of cut out by the two off-diagonal coordinates has -points the invertible diagonal matrices, which form a subgroup of for every ; by [F2] it is a closed subgroup scheme, and we call it . As a scheme is the open subscheme of the affine plane with coordinates , and by [F1] both and are smooth and affine of finite type over .
By [F1] the standard representation identifies with , and by [F3] the two factors carry the actions induced by it, whose product is the stated action of on ; the point is a -point of . A matrix preserves the line exactly when and preserves exactly when , and the two stabilizer functors are closed; hence the scheme-theoretic stabilizer has for every -algebra and equals by [F2].
Let be the diagonal and define by ; it is well defined because is invertible and . For a field , every -point of has linearly independent generators , , and the matrix with columns is an invertible element of mapping to ; hence is surjective on -points and its image set is .
Put and apply [F3] to its identity point, obtaining the two universal line subbundles . On an open where both have frames , the determinant is nonzero in every residue field: two lines in a two-dimensional vector space are dependent exactly when they coincide, and the diagonal has been removed. Thus the determinant lies in no maximal ideal of any affine chart of and is a unit; the column matrix is invertible. It defines a section of over and proves . The isomorphism , , has inverse : the second component preserves the two coordinate lines and hence belongs to the diagonal torus by step 1.2. These opens cover , so is locally a projection with fibre the torus , flat and locally of finite presentation by [F1] and [F5]. It is surjective by step 1.3, hence faithfully flat.
The morphism of the criterion , , is an isomorphism: on -points for every -algebra it is a bijection onto the pairs with , with inverse , and exactly when by the stabilizer computation of step 1.2.
Applying the criterion [F4] to , with , , and from steps 2.1 and 2.2 shows that represents the fppf quotient sheaf and that the quotient morphism is . Since the image of is by step 1.3, the orbit subscheme and agree; so represents , the quotient morphism is , and the conclusions of (a) and (b) follow, including the representability of .
For (c): the quotient is isomorphic to by step 3.1; the orbit is smooth over and of finite type by Smooth orbits are locally closed and their orbit maps are faithfully flat over every field, and it is separated over because it is a locally closed subscheme of the separated finite-type -scheme by [F5], an immersion being separated (Open and closed immersions are separated) and separatedness being stable under composition (Separated morphisms compose). Base changing to an algebraic closure , the orbit-stabilizer identity [F6] applied to the connected smooth group acting on and the orbit gives , and , which is the stated dimension. Here is the nonempty open subset of , of dimension by [F5] and Affine and projective n-space have dimension n, and is the nonempty open subset of , of dimension by the same two results; is connected because it is a nonempty open subscheme of the irreducible , whose coordinate ring is a domain (A polynomial ring over an integral domain is an integral domain), so that the zero ideal corresponds to under the Nullstellensatz correspondence (Affine algebraic sets correspond to radical ideals, and irreducible ones to prime ideals) and nonempty open subschemes are irreducible by Irreducibility via nonempty open subsets, connectedness and open subspaces.
The first projection is the composite of the isomorphism with ; over a point put and let be its canonical -point; the fibre is , which is with one closed point removed. Finally the natural map is surjective because every -point of is for some by step 1.3, and injective because forces by step 2.2; hence it is a bijection for every extension field . This completes the verification of (c).
Sources
- The Stacks Project, Groupoid Schemes, Sections 39.20 and 39.23 (tags 02VG, 03BD, 03C5, 03BM, 03BE)
- The Stacks Project, Properties of Algebraic Spaces, Section 66.14 (tags 07S5, 07S6, 0BBM)
- J. S. Milne, Algebraic Groups (corrected 2022 printing, Cambridge University Press)
- Michel Brion, Introduction to actions of algebraic groups, Les cours du CIRM 1 (2010), no. 1, 1-22