Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Algebraic Group Actions, Orbits, Stabilizers, and Controlled Quotients — Examples

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

The examples test the quotient theory of algebraic-group-actions-orbits-stabilizers-and-controlled-quotients on explicit actions. The orbit set of k-points need not be the k-points of the fppf quotient sheaf takes μ2 acting on Spec⁡k[x]/(x2−a) for a nonsquare a: the orbit set of k-points is empty, yet the quotient sheaf is represented by Spec⁡k, so sheafification is strictly necessary and the orbit set does not compute the k-points of the quotient sheaf. The quotient of GL2 by the diagonal torus is the complement of the diagonal in P1 x P1 computes the quotient of GL2 by the diagonal torus as the complement of the diagonal in Pk1×kPk1, with its dimension, projection fibres and field-valued coset description.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

None yet.

5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

CounterexampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

The orbit set of k-points need not be the k-points of the fppf quotient sheaf

Statement refuted

For every finite-type k-group scheme G acting on a finite-type k-scheme X, the orbit set X(k)/G(k) of k-points computes the k-points of the fppf quotient sheaf X/G.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC inherited from the quotient-sheaf supplier; a field k of characteristic ≠2 containing a nonsquare a∈k× (for example k=R, a=−1); X=Spec⁡k[x]/(x2−a); and G=μ2=Spec⁡k[t]/(t2−1).

[F1]

A group law on an affine scheme Spec⁡A is given by comultiplication, counit and antipode maps satisfying the group-object identities, and on R-points it gives a natural group structure (Group schemes of finite type over a field, Affine schemes are contravariantly equivalent to commutative rings, Affine fibre products are spectra of tensor products); a closed subscheme of a finite-type group scheme is a closed subgroup scheme exactly when its R-points form a subgroup for every R (Closed subgroup schemes are detected on all algebra-valued points, Morphisms and closed subgroup schemes of group schemes).

[F2]

An action is a morphism G×kX→X satisfying the unit and associativity diagrams, and it is determined by its values on R-points (Algebraic group actions, orbit maps, orbit subschemes and scheme-theoretic stabilizers). The action and second projection define the morphism (g,z)↦(gz,z):G×kX→X×kX (Fibre product of schemes).

[F3]

A morphism locally of finite presentation is étale when it is flat and has vanishing relative differentials (Étale equals flat and unramified in finite presentation, Étale morphism of schemes). For the two algebras below, their explicit rank-two free bases also establish finiteness and local freeness; no general finite-étale module criterion is needed.

[F4]

The affine finite locally free equivalence relation R=G×kX⇉X with j=(t,s) an equivalence relation and invariants C={f:s♯(f)=t♯(f)} has C finite type over k, quotient X→Spec⁡C finite locally free and surjective, and Spec⁡C represents the fppf quotient sheaf X/G (Affine finite locally free equivalence relations have finite locally free scheme quotients).

[F5]

The fppf quotient sheaf is the sheafification of the naive quotient presheaf T↦X(T)/G(T) in the fppf topology, and a scheme represents it when its functor is naturally isomorphic to the sheafification (Quotient sheaves and representable quotients for pre-relations and group actions, Fibre product of schemes).

Counterexample

1.1F3givenalgebra

The algebra A=k[x]/(x2−a) is a field K=k[x]/(x2−a): the polynomial x2−a has no root in k because a is a nonsquare, hence is irreducible of degree two, and it is separable because its derivative 2x is nonzero as char⁡k≠2 and a≠0. Thus A is free of rank two over k and finitely presented, and ΩA/k=A dx/(2x dx)=0 because x is a unit with x2=a∈k× and 2 is a unit; by [F3], X→Spec⁡k is finite étale of degree two. A k-algebra map A→k would send x to an element q∈k with q2=a, so X(k)=∅ and the orbit set X(k)/G(k) is empty.

1.2F1F2givenconstruct

Put G=Spec⁡k[t]/(t2−1) with comultiplication t↦t⊗t, counit t↦1 and antipode t↦t, the last well defined because t2=1; for every k-algebra R the set G(R)={r∈R:r2=1} is a group under multiplication, naturally in R, so by [F1] these maps make G a finite-type k-group scheme with these groups of points. The formula g⋅z=gz defines a natural action of G(R) on X(R)={z∈R:z2=a}: it is associative, unital, and stays in X(R) because (gz)2=g2z2=a, so by [F2] there is a morphism α:G×kX→X with α(g,z)=gz.

2.1step 1.2F2algebraconstruct

The morphism φ:G×kX→X×kX, (g,z)↦(gz,z), is an isomorphism. On coordinate rings it is the k-algebra map k[x,y]/(x2−a,y2−a)→k[t,x]/(t2−1,x2−a) with x↦tx and y↦x; in the source ring x and y are units with x2=y2=a∈k×, and the assignment t↦x/y, x↦y defines an inverse: it respects the relations since (x/y)2=x2/y2=1 and y2=a, and the two composites fix each generator.

3.1step 1.1step 1.2step 2.1F4givenalgebra

The relation R=G×kX⇉X has s(g,z)=z and t(g,z)=gz, so j=(t,s) is the isomorphism φ of step 2.1, in particular an equivalence relation. The ring B=A[t]/(t2−1) is free over A via s with basis 1,t, so s is finite locally free. The involution (g,z)↦(g,gz) carries s to t, so t is finite locally free as well. The invariant ring is C=k: for f=α+βx one computes s♯(f)=α+βx and t♯(f)=α+βtx in B≅K×K (evaluation at t=1,−1). Equality is equivalent to βx(t−1)=0; since x is a unit and t−1 has components (0,−2), this forces β=0. By [F4] the quotient is represented by Spec⁡C=Spec⁡k, so (X/G)(k)={∗}.

3.2F5step 2.1algebra

Consider the identity section idX∈X(X) and its class [idX] in the naive quotient presheaf P(X)=X(X)/G(X) of [F5]. Its two pullbacks along the projections X×kX⇉X are the first and second projections, which differ by the element u=y/x∈G(X×kX): indeed u2=y2/x2=a/a=1, so u is a μ2-valued point, and u⋅pr1=pr2 because u⋅x=y. Hence the two pullbacks of [idX] in P(X×kX) agree, so the class of the identity section is a compatible family of sections of the naive presheaf over the fppf covering X→Spec⁡k.

4.1F5step 1.1step 3.1step 3.2given∎

That compatible family does not descend: P(k)=X(k)/G(k) is empty by step 1.1, so there is no class in P(k) whose pullback along X→Spec⁡k could be the class of the identity section. Therefore the naive quotient presheaf is not an fppf sheaf and is not the quotient sheaf X/G; since X/G is represented by Spec⁡k with (X/G)(k)={∗} by step 3.1, while X(k)/G(k)=∅, the orbit set does not compute the k-points of the quotient sheaf. Sheafification is strictly necessary, and the quotient sheaf here is representable: the counterexample separates the orbit set from the quotient sheaf, not representability from the quotient sheaf.

ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedOpen item page →

The quotient of GL2 by the diagonal torus is the complement of the diagonal in P1 x P1

Example

Assume the Axiom of Choice inherited from the homogeneous-space and projective-bundle suppliers. Let k be a field, let G=GL2 with its standard representation on V=k2 (The general linear group scheme and its coordinate ring), and let T⊆G be the diagonal torus, the closed subgroup scheme whose R-points are the invertible diagonal matrices (Morphisms and closed subgroup schemes of group schemes, Closed subgroup schemes are detected on all algebra-valued points). (a) T is a closed subgroup scheme of the smooth affine group scheme G, and the fppf quotient sheaf G/T (Quotient sheaves and representable quotients for pre-relations and group actions) is representable (Homogeneous spaces of smooth affine groups are separated schemes). (b) Let G act on Y=Pk1×kPk1 by the product of the actions induced on each factor by the standard representation (A linear representation induces an action on projective space with the same line stabilizers), and let o=(⟨e1⟩,⟨e2⟩)∈Y(k). Then the stabilizer of o is T, the orbit Oo is exactly the open subscheme {(L1,L2)∈Y:L1≠L2} (complement of the diagonal), and the orbit map induces an isomorphism G/T≅Oo (A faithfully flat orbit map represents the coset quotient sheaf, Fibre dimension and orbit dimension add to the dimension of the group). (c) Consequently G/T is a smooth separated finite-type k-scheme whose base change to an algebraic closure has dimension 2 (equal to dim⁡G−dim⁡T=4−2, by the orbit-stabilizer dimension identity); the morphism G/T→Pk1, (L1,L2)↦L1, has over every point y∈Pk1 a fibre isomorphic to Pκ(y)1 minus the κ(y)-rational point defined by y; and for every extension field K/k the natural map G(K)/T(K)→(G/T)(K) is a bijection.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, a field k, the group G=GL2 with its standard representation on V=k2, the diagonal torus T⊆G, the surface Y=Pk1×kPk1 with the product action, and the point o=(⟨e1⟩,⟨e2⟩).

[F1]

GL⁡n=Spec⁡k[xij,d−1] is a group scheme of finite type with GL⁡n(R) the invertible matrices, and GL⁡V(R)=Aut⁡R(VR) is naturally identified with it (The general linear group scheme and its coordinate ring). Moreover GL⁡2 is standard smooth of relative dimension 4 over k: the polynomial ring k[x11,x12,x21,x22] is standard smooth with the empty presentation, and GL⁡2 is its localization at d, so it is finitely presented and flat with geometrically regular fibres, hence smooth over k (Standard smooth presentations and locally standard smooth maps, Standard smooth algebras are finitely presented and flat, Locally standard smooth iff flat with geometrically regular fibres, Smooth morphism of schemes). The same argument applies to every principal localization of a polynomial ring, in particular to the diagonal torus T=Spec⁡k[a,d,(ad)−1], which is standard smooth of relative dimension 2 with the empty presentation, hence smooth, of finite type, flat and locally of finite presentation over k.

[F2]

A closed subscheme of a finite-type group scheme is a closed subgroup scheme exactly when its R-points form a subgroup for every R (Closed subgroup schemes are detected on all algebra-valued points, Morphisms and closed subgroup schemes of group schemes).

[F3]

A rational representation induces an action on Plines(V)=P(V∨) whose T-points are rank-one locally direct summand subbundles, with action L↦r(g)L, and the scheme-theoretic stabilizer of [L] has R-points {g:r(g)LR=LR} (A linear representation induces an action on projective space with the same line stabilizers, Fibres of the orbit map and the scheme-theoretic stabilizer as a closed subgroup scheme).

[F4]

Representability criterion: if q:U→M equalizes a pre-relation s,t:R⇉U, q is faithfully flat and locally of finite presentation, and (t,s):R→U×MU is an isomorphism, then M represents the fppf quotient sheaf U/R (Criterion for a scheme to represent an fppf quotient sheaf).

[F5]

For every field k, Pk1 is a smooth proper geometrically integral curve over k, hence separated and of finite type over k (Projective-line curve and divisor basics, Proper morphisms); smoothness, separatedness and finite type are stable under base change and composition, so Y=Pk1×kPk1 is smooth, separated and of finite type over k (Smoothness survives base change and composition, Finite type under base change and products over a field, Separatedness survives base change, Separated morphisms compose). For every smooth finite-type k-scheme Z and every k-scheme U the projection Z×kU→U is flat and locally of finite presentation, being the base change of the flat and locally finitely presented structure morphism Z→Spec⁡k (Smooth morphism of schemes, Flatness is stable under arbitrary base change, Local finiteness conditions under base change). A nonempty open subset of an irreducible classical variety has the same dimension (Nonempty opens preserve irreducible dimension).

[F6]

Over an algebraically closed field, for a connected smooth group scheme with a closed point the orbit-stabilizer dimension identity dim⁡G=dim⁡Gx+dim⁡Ox holds (Fibre dimension and orbit dimension add to the dimension of the group).

Verification

Given: AC, the field k, G=GL2 with its standard representation on V=k2, the diagonal torus T, the product action on Y=P1×P1, and o=(⟨e1⟩,⟨e2⟩).

1.1F1F2givenconstruct

The closed subscheme of G cut out by the two off-diagonal coordinates has R-points the invertible diagonal matrices, which form a subgroup of GL⁡2(R) for every R; by [F2] it is a closed subgroup scheme, and we call it T. As a scheme T is the open subscheme ad≠0 of the affine plane with coordinates a,d, and by [F1] both G and T are smooth and affine of finite type over k.

1.2F1F2F3givenalgebra

By [F1] the standard representation identifies GL⁡V with G, and by [F3] the two factors P(V∨)≅P1 carry the actions induced by it, whose product is the stated action of G on Y; the point o=(⟨e1⟩,⟨e2⟩) is a k-point of Y. A matrix g=(a b;c d) preserves the line ⟨e1⟩ exactly when c=0 and preserves ⟨e2⟩ exactly when b=0, and the two stabilizer functors are closed; hence the scheme-theoretic stabilizer Go has Go(R)=T(R) for every k-algebra R and equals T by [F2].

1.3F3givenalgebraconstruct

Let Δ⊆Y be the diagonal and define q:G→Y∖Δ by q(g)=(g⟨e1⟩,g⟨e2⟩); it is well defined because g is invertible and ⟨e1⟩≠⟨e2⟩. For a field K, every K-point (L1,L2) of Y∖Δ has linearly independent generators u∈L1, v∈L2, and the matrix with columns u,v is an invertible element of G(K) mapping o to (L1,L2); hence q is surjective on K-points and its image set is Y∖Δ.

2.1F1F3F5step 1.2step 1.3givenconstructalgebra

Put M=Y∖Δ and apply [F3] to its identity point, obtaining the two universal line subbundles L1,L2⊆VM. On an open U⊆M where both have frames u,v, the determinant u∧v is nonzero in every residue field: two lines in a two-dimensional vector space are dependent exactly when they coincide, and the diagonal has been removed. Thus the determinant lies in no maximal ideal of any affine chart of U and is a unit; the column matrix a=(u,v) is invertible. It defines a section of q over U and proves L1⊕L2=VU. The isomorphism U×kT→q−1(U), (m,h)↦a(m)h, has inverse g↦(q(g),a(q(g))−1g): the second component preserves the two coordinate lines and hence belongs to the diagonal torus by step 1.2. These opens cover M, so q is locally a projection with fibre the torus T, flat and locally of finite presentation by [F1] and [F5]. It is surjective by step 1.3, hence faithfully flat.

2.2step 1.2givenalgebra

The morphism of the criterion G×kT→G×Y∖ΔG, (g,h)↦(g,gh), is an isomorphism: on R-points for every k-algebra R it is a bijection onto the pairs (g,g′)∈G(R)2 with q(g)=q(g′), with inverse (g,g′)↦(g,g−1g′), and g−1g′∈T(R) exactly when q(g)=q(g′) by the stabilizer computation of step 1.2.

3.1F4step 1.3step 2.1step 2.2given

Applying the criterion [F4] to U=G, R=G×kT with s(g,h)=g, t(g,h)=gh, M=Y∖Δ and q from steps 2.1 and 2.2 shows that Y∖Δ represents the fppf quotient sheaf G/T and that the quotient morphism is q. Since the image of q is Y∖Δ by step 1.3, the orbit subscheme Oo and Y∖Δ agree; so Oo represents G/T, the quotient morphism is ϱo=q, and the conclusions of (a) and (b) follow, including the representability of G/T.

4.1F5F6step 3.1givenalgebra

For (c): the quotient G/T is isomorphic to Oo by step 3.1; the orbit Oo is smooth over k and of finite type by Smooth orbits are locally closed and their orbit maps are faithfully flat over every field, and it is separated over k because it is a locally closed subscheme of the separated finite-type k-scheme Y by [F5], an immersion being separated (Open and closed immersions are separated) and separatedness being stable under composition (Separated morphisms compose). Base changing to an algebraic closure kˉ, the orbit-stabilizer identity [F6] applied to the connected smooth group Gkˉ acting on Ykˉ and the orbit Oo,kˉ gives dim⁡Oo,kˉ=dim⁡Gkˉ−dim⁡Tkˉ=4−2=2, and (G/T)kˉ≅Oo,kˉ, which is the stated dimension. Here GL⁡2 is the nonempty open subset d≠0 of A4, of dimension 4 by [F5] and Affine and projective n-space have dimension n, and T is the nonempty open subset ad≠0 of A2, of dimension 2 by the same two results; Gkˉ is connected because it is a nonempty open subscheme of the irreducible Akˉ4, whose coordinate ring kˉ[x1,…,x4] is a domain (A polynomial ring over an integral domain is an integral domain), so that the zero ideal corresponds to A4 under the Nullstellensatz correspondence (Affine algebraic sets correspond to radical ideals, and irreducible ones to prime ideals) and nonempty open subschemes are irreducible by Irreducibility via nonempty open subsets, connectedness and open subspaces.

5.1step 1.3step 2.2step 3.1step 4.1given∎

The first projection Y∖Δ→P1 is the composite of the isomorphism G/T≅Y∖Δ with pr1; over a point y put K=κ(y) and let L1 be its canonical K-point; the fibre is {L2∈PK1:L2≠L1}, which is PK1 with one closed point removed. Finally the natural map G(K)/T(K)→(G/T)(K) is surjective because every K-point of Y∖Δ is q(g) for some g∈G(K) by step 1.3, and injective because q(g)=q(g′) forces g−1g′∈T(K) by step 2.2; hence it is a bijection for every extension field K/k. This completes the verification of (c).

Sources