How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Pontryagin Duality for Locally Compact Abelian Groups — Examples
1 · Prerequisites
- Absolute and Conditional Convergence; Rearrangement; Products
- Analyticity of Holomorphic Functions; Liouville and Morera
- Approximation and Compactness in C(K)
- Arc Length and Rectifiable Curves
- Areas of Elementary Plane Figures
- Banach Alaoglu Goldstine and Krein Milman
- Banach Algebras Spectrum and Holomorphic Functional Calculus
- Banach Valued Integration and the Radon Nikodym Property
- Binary Operations, Monoids, Groups and Subgroups
- Bochner Inversion and Plancherel on LCA Groups
- Bounded Linear Operators and Quotient Spaces
- Bounded Variation and the Riemann–Stieltjes Integral
- Central Limit Theorems
- Character Groups and Elementary LCA Duals
- Compact Operators and Riesz Schauder Theory
- Compactness
- Compactness in Metric Spaces
- Completeness, Completion, and Uniform Continuity
- Complex Differentiability and the Cauchy–Riemann Equations
- Complex Lp Spaces and Test-Function Conventions
- Complex Power Series and Analytic Functions
- Congruences, the Integers Modulo n and the Chinese Remainder Theorem
- Connectedness
- Construction of the Natural Numbers
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Cauchy Sequences
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Dedekind Cuts
- Continuity, IVT, EVT, and Uniform Continuity
- Continuous Functional Calculus for Self Adjoint and Normal Operators
- Contour Integration
- Convergence: Nets and Filters
- Cosets, Index and Lagrange's Theorem
- Countability and Uncountability
- Countability Axioms and Cardinal Functions
- Covering Spaces and Lifting
- Cyclic Groups and Direct Products
- Density Separability and Convolution in Lᵖ
- Determinants of Matrices over a Commutative Ring
- Divisibility, Euclidean Domains, Principal Ideal Domains and Unique Factorisation
- Divisibility, Greatest Common Divisors and Bézout's Identity
- Dual Spaces Adjoint Operators and Annihilators
- Dual Spaces, Bilinear and Quadratic Forms, and Sylvester's Law of Inertia
- Filters and Ultrafilters
- Finite Counting, Factorials and Binomial Coefficients
- Foundations of the Real Numbers for Analysis
- Free Modules, Exact Sequences, Projective and Injective Modules
- Fubini and Change of Variables
- Function Space Topologies and the Exponential Law
- Fundamental Trigonometric Identities
- Gaussian Elimination, Elementary Matrices and Reduced Row Echelon Form
- Gelfand Theory and Commutative C Star Algebras
- Goursat's Theorem and Cauchy's Theorem in a Convex Domain
- Group Actions, Orbits, Stabilisers and Cayley's Theorem
- Group Homomorphisms and the Isomorphism Theorems
- Haar Measure Existence and Uniqueness
- Hausdorff via the Diagonal
- Hereditary and Productive Behaviour of the Separation Axioms
- Hilbert Space Geometry and Riesz Representation
- Homotopy and Homotopy Equivalence
- Ideals, Quotient Rings and the Isomorphism Theorems for Rings
- Inner Product Spaces, Gram-Schmidt, Projections and Adjoints
- Itos Formula and Brownian Martingales
- Lebesgue Measure on Euclidean Space
- Limits of Real Functions
- limsup, liminf, and Subsequential Limits
- Line Integrals and the Gradient Theorem
- Linear Independence, Bases and Dimension
- Linear Transformations, Rank-Nullity and Quotient Spaces
- Matrices, the Matrix of a Linear Map, and Change of Basis
- Measurable Functions and Simple Approximation
- Measures and Their Basic Properties
- Metric Spaces
- Mixed Partials, Taylor Formulae, and Extrema
- Modes of Convergence Egorov and Lusin
- Modules, Submodules, Quotient Modules and the Isomorphism Theorems
- Monotone Functions, Discontinuities, and Continuity Sets
- Monotone Sequences, Bolzano-Weierstrass, and Cauchy Completeness
- Normal Subgroups and Quotient Groups
- Normed and Banach Spaces
- Norming and Separation under Hahn–Banach
- Order, Zorn's Lemma, and the Axiom of Choice
- Orthonormal Bases, Parseval and Fourier Series
- Outer Measure and the Caratheodory Extension Theorem
- Partitions of Unity and Paracompactness
- pi: the Equivalent Characterizations
- Polynomial Rings, the Division Algorithm and Roots
- Pontryagin Duality for Locally Compact Abelian Groups
- Power Series and Real-Analytic Functions
- Product Measures and the Fubini Tonelli Theorems
- Properties of the Integral and the Working FTC
- Radon Measures and the Riesz Markov Kakutani Theorem
- Relations, Functions, and Quotients
- Rings, Subrings, Integral Domains and Fields
- Rⁿ as a Normed Space; Vector-Valued Functions
- Roots, Rational Powers, and Classical Inequalities
- Separation Axioms: the Hierarchy
- Sequences and Limits
- Sequences and Series of Functions; Uniform Convergence
- Series: Convergence and the Nonnegative Tests
- Sigma Algebras and Borel Sets
- Signed and Complex Measures Hahn and Jordan
- Simple Field Extensions and the Construction of the Complex Numbers
- Sine, Cosine, and the Definition of Pi
- Stone–Weierstrass in General
- Subspaces, Products, and Quotients
- Suprema and Infima
- Symmetric Groups, Cycle Decomposition and the Sign Homomorphism
- The Analytic Hahn Banach Theorem
- The Ascoli–Arzelà Theorem
- The Baire Principles of Functional Analysis
- The Cantor Set, Baire Category, and Measure Zero in ℝ
- The Complex Exponential and Euler's Formula
- The Derivative and the Mean Value Theorems
- The Exponential Function
- The Fundamental Group
- The Fundamental Group of the Circle
- The Fundamental Theorems of Calculus
- The Identity Theorem, the Maximum Principle and the Open Mapping Theorem
- The Lebesgue Integral and the Convergence Theorems
- The Logarithm and General Powers
- The Lᵖ Spaces Holder Minkowski and Riesz Fischer
- The Riemann Integral in Rᵐ and Jordan Content
- The Riemann Integral: Definition and Integrability
- The Topology of Euclidean Space
- The Total Derivative in ℝᵐ → ℝⁿ
- The Winding Number and the Global Cauchy Theorem
- The ZFC Axioms and the Basic Set Constructions
- Topological Spaces and Continuity
- Topology of ℝ
- Triangularisation, Generalised Eigenspaces and Jordan Canonical Form
- Uniform Spaces: the Three Definitions
- Urysohn's Lemma and the Tietze Extension Theorem
- Vector Spaces, Linear Subspaces, Span and Direct Sums
2 · Summary
These examples and counterexample exercise the duality interface of the companion page on concrete groups, and they are where the convention that the dual carries the compact-open topology can be seen to do real work.
The first example computes annihilators inside Euclidean space, where the dual is again Euclidean space with the pairing . It compares the annihilator of a linear subspace, which is the coarse orthogonal complement, with the annihilator of a lattice: for the degenerate inclusion the annihilator is , so it is a lattice only in the full-rank case, and the quotient-dual identification is read off on standard coordinates as the discrete Fourier pairing. The matrix case gives . The second example computes the bidual maps on the circle and the integers under the published dual identifications: evaluation reproduces exactly the integer or the point it started from, so the abstract biduality identification is the natural one on these two groups. The counterexample then shows that the algebraic character group of equipped with the discrete topology fails biduality: a -linear map of the line obtained from a Hamel basis induces a discontinuous algebraic character of the circle, so the group of continuous characters is strictly larger than . With the compact-open topology the same group is compact and biduality holds.
3 · Logical flowchart
4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs
None yet.
5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements
Annihilators of closed subgroups of Euclidean space
Example
Let and be integers. Coordinates are indexed by (The standard list with and for is an ordered basis of ; hence , and is the zero space with basis and dimension ). Work in with the dual identified with by , computed below from the classification of characters of the line and the product-dual identification (Continuous characters of the real line are exponentials, Duals of finite products and of discrete direct sums). No choice principle is used by the computations below; the general quotient-dual and closed-subgroup identifications cited in the dependency list give the context of clause (2), whose coordinate content is computed directly here.
(1) If is a linear subspace, then ; when this is , the coarse orthogonal complement, whereas for the lattice it is . For the annihilator of the full-rank lattice is again the lattice , while for the annihilator contains the line and is not discrete; so an annihilator is not in general an orthogonal complement.
(2) For the quotient is identified with , and its characters are computed on the standard coordinates by the discrete Fourier pairing: its characters are exactly the maps with , whose pullbacks are precisely the characters of trivial on .
(3) If is an invertible real matrix and , then with .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The group with its standard topology and the dual identification constructed from the character classification of the line and the product-dual identification (Continuous characters of the real line are exponentials, Duals of finite products and of discrete direct sums).
Every continuous homomorphism is for a unique , and is an isomorphism of topological groups : the classification of characters of the line supplies the algebraic bijection, and finite-product duality reduces the topology check to the line. On the line, compact is bounded, say ; continuity of at makes uniformly close to on when is small. Conversely, if , then gives , so the uniform ball of radius on this compact interval forces . Uniform balls are compact-open neighbourhoods by The compact-open character group is a Hausdorff topological abelian group, and compactness and boundedness of these line sets follow from Heine-Borel in : with the Euclidean metric a subset of is compact if and only if it is closed and bounded, and the proof by bisection uses no choice principle; the same holds on the real line. The value at is by , , and . At both groups are trivial. (Continuous characters of the real line are exponentials, Duals of finite products and of discrete direct sums, The Pontryagin dual with the compact-open topology)
, and exactly when , while for . (The annihilator of a subgroup, , and exactly when , The integers as equivalence classes of pairs of naturals)
The quotient for is with the product topology: each projection is continuous and open, since the saturation of an open set is the union of its integer translates. The finite product of these maps and identity maps is therefore continuous, open and surjective, with kernel , and the induced quotient bijection is continuous and open. A continuous character on constant on the cosets of factors through the quotient map, uniquely and continuously; conversely characters of the quotient pull back to characters of that are trivial on . (The quotient group and coset product , The discrete, indiscrete, cofinite, cocountable, particular-point and Sierpinski topologies, For a quotient map , a map out of is continuous iff its composite with is; a continuous map on constant on the fibres of factors uniquely through ; and a composite of quotient maps is a quotient map, Homeomorphism, open map, closed map, embedding, and what it means for a property to be topological)
For a real matrix , a vector and one has and ; the standard basis vectors lie in , and satisfies for all exactly when . (Transpose is linear and involutive, and , The transpose of a matrix, Invertible matrices and the general linear group , The standard list with and for is an ordered basis of ; hence , and is the zero space with basis and dimension , The integers as equivalence classes of pairs of naturals)
Verification
For a linear subspace , a character lies in exactly when for every , by [F1] and [F2]. When and for and , the condition for all real forces (otherwise take ); the remaining coordinates are unconstrained, so .
For , the condition for all reads for all integers . Taking gives for , and the remaining coordinates are unconstrained; hence . In particular is not discrete when , since the nonzero vectors lie in it and converge to as positive integers , and the full-rank case gives .
For with invertible, if and only if for all , that is for all , which by [F4] holds exactly when , that is .
For , the quotient identified in [F3] has the standard coordinates and . A character with satisfies for all , so it is constant on cosets and factors through the quotient, where it takes the value on the class of ; these are exactly the characters of the quotient, which is the stated discrete Fourier pairing on the torus factor.
Clauses (1), (2) and (3) are proved in steps 1.1 and 1.2, step 2.1 and step 1.3; the example also records that "the annihilator of a lattice is a lattice" holds only in the full-rank case of clause (3), not for the degenerate subgroups with .
The bidual map on the circle and the integers
Example
Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice) and Dependent Choice (The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an -indexed chain); the two identifications of values below are direct computations from the classifications of the characters of and given in the Facts, and the continuity statement is exactly Pontryagin biduality: the evaluation map is a topological isomorphism. Under the identifications , , and , , the evaluation map is the identity of , and is the identity of . In particular the abstract biduality identification is the natural one on these two groups, not merely an abstract isomorphism.
Facts & Assumptions
A homomorphism is determined by , and every occurs; since carries the discrete topology every such homomorphism is continuous. Hence is an algebraic isomorphism . Compact subsets of the discrete space are finite (their cover by singletons has a finite subcover), so the preimage of each compact-open subbasic set is a finite intersection of open conditions on powers of ; the inverse is evaluation at , whose preimages of open sets are subbasic open sets. Thus both directions are continuous. (The integers as equivalence classes of pairs of naturals, The discrete, indiscrete, cofinite, cocountable, particular-point and Sierpinski topologies, The Pontryagin dual with the compact-open topology, Topological group: multiplication and inversion are continuous)
Every continuous homomorphism is for a unique . Indeed, writing through the unit-circle isomorphism, corresponds to a continuous homomorphism with ; by the classification of characters of the line there is a unique with , and forces , that is by the kernel of the complex exponential. The dual of the compact circle is discrete by Compact groups have discrete duals and discrete groups have compact duals, so this bijection from the discrete group is a topological isomorphism. (The multiplicative unit circle is a compact metrizable topological abelian group, Continuous characters of the real line are exponentials, , and exactly when , The Pontryagin dual with the compact-open topology)
For every locally compact Hausdorff abelian group the evaluation map is an isomorphism of topological groups . (Pontryagin biduality: the evaluation map is a topological isomorphism)
Verification
Under the identification [F1], the element corresponds to the character of , so for one has ; reading this character of through the identification of [F2], which assigns to the character , gives the integer . Hence is the identity of .
Under the identification of [F2], the integer corresponds to the character of , so for one has ; reading this character of through the identification [F1] gives back . Hence is the identity of .
By [F3] the maps and are topological isomorphisms, and steps 1.1 and 1.2 identify them with the identity maps of and ; so the biduality identification is the natural one on these groups, which is the example.
Forgetting the compact-open topology destroys Pontryagin duality
Statement refuted
The biduality conclusion of Pontryagin duality holds for every algebraic character group when the group is equipped with the discrete topology: if is the algebraic character group of the discrete group with the discrete topology, then the evaluation map is an isomorphism.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice), the discrete additive group (The integers as equivalence classes of pairs of naturals, The discrete, indiscrete, cofinite, cocountable, particular-point and Sierpinski topologies) and the multiplicative circle (The multiplicative unit circle is a compact metrizable topological abelian group).
The map is an isomorphism of topological groups , because a homomorphism out of is determined by its value at and is discrete. Compact subsets of the discrete space are finite (their cover by singletons has a finite subcover), so the preimage of each compact-open subbasic set is a finite intersection of open conditions on powers of ; the inverse is evaluation at , whose preimages of open sets are subbasic open sets. Thus both directions are continuous. Every continuous homomorphism is for a unique : writing , the character corresponds to a continuous homomorphism with , the classification of characters of the line gives for a unique real , and forces by the kernel of the complex exponential. (The integers as equivalence classes of pairs of naturals, The discrete, indiscrete, cofinite, cocountable, particular-point and Sierpinski topologies, The multiplicative unit circle is a compact metrizable topological abelian group, Continuous characters of the real line are exponentials, , and exactly when , The Pontryagin dual with the compact-open topology)
Assuming the Axiom of Choice, has a Hamel basis over : every real is a finite -linear combination of basis elements in exactly one way, a -linear map is determined by its values on , and the coefficient of any basis element is a well-defined -linear map. (Assuming the Axiom of Choice, has a Hamel basis over : there is such that every real is a finite -linear combination of elements of in exactly one way, and each basis vector carries a well-defined -linear coefficient map)
A group homomorphism on a discrete group is continuous, and every function on a discrete space is continuous; composition of continuous homomorphisms is a continuous homomorphism, and consists of the integer multiples of . (The discrete, indiscrete, cofinite, cocountable, particular-point and Sierpinski topologies, Monoid homomorphism and group homomorphism, Topological group: multiplication and inversion are continuous, The integers as equivalence classes of pairs of naturals)
The assumed AC implies DC (AC implies DC implies countable choice), so biduality applies with its full choice hypotheses. With the compact-open topology the group is compact, because the dual of a discrete abelian group is compact under the Axiom of Choice, and Pontryagin biduality identifies its dual with through the evaluation isomorphism. (Compact groups have discrete duals and discrete groups have compact duals, Pontryagin biduality: the evaluation map is a topological isomorphism, Open cover, subcover, and compact topological space; a compact subset is a subspace that is compact in its own right, The Pontryagin dual with the compact-open topology)
Counterexample
Identify with by [F1] and equip it with the discrete topology. Since a homomorphism on the discrete group is automatically continuous by [F3], the group of continuous characters is exactly the group of all algebraic homomorphisms. The evaluation map is ; with the compact-open topology on , [F1] says these power maps are exactly its continuous characters.
By [F2] choose a Hamel basis and expand in it. Choose a basis element whose rational coefficient is nonzero, and put . Then is -linear with , hence for every integer . The complement clause of the Hamel-basis supplier gives another basis vector ; then while . Consequently cannot be multiplication by a real scalar: its value at would force that scalar to be , contradicting its value at . Since , it induces the well-defined homomorphism of . This uses the supplied coordinate map and does not assume the arbitrary Hamel basis contains .
Let be the homomorphism induced by of step 1.2. As a homomorphism from the discrete group it belongs to by [F3]. If it were continuous for the compact-open topology on , then by [F1] there would be with for all , that is for all . The map is then -linear with ; for every and every one has , so and , contradicting the choice of . Hence is an algebraic homomorphism continuous on the discrete but not continuous on the compact-open circle.
The homomorphism lies in but is not one of the maps , so it is not in the image of the evaluation map , whose image is exactly by [F1] and is a copy of . The evaluation map is injective, since determines , but it is not surjective: the discrete algebraic character group fails the biduality conclusion, and no topological constraint on beyond discreteness is available to repair it.
By contrast, with the compact-open topology the same group is compact and [F4] gives through the evaluation map. Thus it is the discarded compact-open topology, not the algebraic character group, that carries Pontryagin biduality; the statement refuted above is false.