Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

✓ 3 results · all verified · 0 also independently AI-judged
Every result on this page is machine-checked by a proof checker and read in full and owner-audited; the judge is an additional, independent cross-model AI review of the proofs. The 3 not AI-judged were verified by owner audit (typically over a confirmed judge false positive), not failures.

Score SDEs and reverse-time generation — Examples

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Logical flowchart

3 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck pendingOpen item page →

Stationary Ornstein–Uhlenbeck score and probability flow

Example

Assume AC. Fix γ>0, θ>0, and T>0. Let (Ω,F,(Ft)t≥0,P) be a complete filtered probability space with a right-continuous filtration. Let W be an adapted standard one-dimensional Brownian motion such that, for every 0≤s<t, Wt−Ws is independent of Fs and has law N(0,t−s). Let X0 be a finite F0-measurable random variable with law N(0,θ), independent of the Brownian process. Define

Xt=e−γtX0+2γθ∫0te−γ(t−r) dWr,0≤t≤T.

This process solves dXt=−γXt dt+2γθ dWt. Every marginal has density p(x)=(2πθ)−1/2e−x2/(2θ) and score s(x)=−x/θ. Its forward Fokker–Planck equation has zero right-hand side, and the probability-flow vector field v(x)=−γx−12(2γθ)s(x) is identically zero. Thus the probability-flow ODE is stationary and the exact finite-time terminal law is PT=N(0,θ).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, W, X0, and Xt as in the Example.

[A1]

The Axiom of Choice is assumed by the Brownian, Itô, and normal-law interfaces used in the verification. The Axiom of Choice

[F1]

Under the stated filtration and increment conditions, the displayed process has a continuous Brownian Itô representation with pathwise integrable drift and a localized Itô integral. Continuous Brownian Ito processes

[F2]

For a one-dimensional Brownian Itô process and f∈C1,2, df(t,Xt)=(∂tf+b∂xf+12σ2∂x2f)(t,Xt) dt+σt∂xf(t,Xt) dWt. One-dimensional Ito formula

[F3]

A deterministic square-integrable integrand h has centered normal Itô integral with variance ∫0th(r)2dr. Deterministic Ito integrals are Gaussian

[F4]

The deterministic Itô integral is an L2 limit of elementary sums of Brownian increments. These sums are measurable with respect to the Brownian process; L2 convergence implies convergence in probability, which has an almost-surely convergent subsequence. Defining its limit on the measurable convergence event gives a Brownian-process-measurable version. Measurable functions of independent random elements remain independent, and replacing a random variable by an almost-surely equal version preserves its joint law with X0. Independent random elements Ito integral for square-integrable predictable processes Measurable coordinatewise functions preserve independence An almost-surely convergent subsequence from convergence in probability

[F5]

The characteristic function of N(m,q) is u↦exp⁡(imu−qu2/2), including q=0. Independent variables have the product characteristic function, and equal characteristic functions determine equal Borel probability laws. Thus independent scalar normal variables have a normal sum with the summed means and variances. Characteristic function of a normal law Characteristic functions under affine maps and independent sums Uniqueness of a law from its characteristic function

[F6]

N(0,θ) for θ>0 has density (2πθ)−1/2e−x2/(2θ). A positive-variance normal law has its location-scale density

[F7]

At positive density points, the marginal score is ∂xlog⁡p(x). Marginal score function

[F8]

For positive finite normalized densities pt of Borel probability laws Pt satisfying the forward equation, with a=σ2 in the scalar case and all displayed derivatives continuous (one-sided in time at endpoints), assume the probability-flow field has the global jointly C1 flow of diffeomorphisms with both time-derivative identities specified in the cited theorem. Starting that flow with law P0 gives law Pt at every time. Probability-flow ODE has the same one-time marginals

Verification

1.1A1F1F2given

Put Mt=∫0teγr dWr, so Xt=e−γt(X0+2γθMt). Apply [F2] to f(t,x)=e−γtx and the continuous Itô process X0+2γθMt. Its drift is zero and its diffusion coefficient is 2γθeγt; the product rule gives dXt=−γXt dt+2γθ dWt, as asserted.

1.2A1F3F4F5F6givenalgebra

For fixed t, [F3] gives Mt∼N(0,∫0te2γrdr). Equivalently the stochastic term in the Example is centered normal with variance 2γθ∫0te−2γ(t−r)dr=θ(1−e−2γt). Its deterministic-integrand Itô approximants are measurable functions of Brownian increments, and [F4] gives a Brownian-process-measurable version of their limit; that version is independent of X0, and almost-sure equality preserves the joint law. The first term is N(0,θe−2γt), and [F5] gives Xt∼N(0,θe−2γt+θ(1−e−2γt))=N(0,θ). By [F6], its density is the one displayed in the Example.

2.1F6F7step 1.2algebra

Differentiating the density in [F6] gives ∂xp=−(x/θ)p and ∂xxp=(x2/θ2−1/θ)p. With b(x)=−γx and a=2γθ, the Fokker–Planck right-hand side is −∂x(bp)+12∂xx(ap)=γ∂x(xp)+γθ∂xxp=0 by substitution of these derivatives. Thus pt=p is a positive smooth solution of the forward equation and [F7] gives s(x)=−x/θ.

3.1F7F8step 1.2step 2.1algebra∎

The diffusion covariance a=σ2=2γθ is constant, so ∂xa=0. Substituting b=−γx, a=2γθ, and s=−x/θ into the probability-flow velocity gives v(x)=−γx−12(2γθ)(−x/θ)=0. Its global flow is Φt,s(x)=x, jointly smooth and a diffeomorphism satisfying the flow composition and both time-derivative identities since v=0. Step 1.2 identifies pt=p as a normalized probability density; p, b, and a are smooth, and step 2.1 verifies the forward equation. Thus every hypothesis of [F8] holds, so the deterministic flow started with law N(0,θ) preserves that law at each time, including T.

ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck pendingOpen item page →

A singular Brownian data law forces positive-time score truncation

Example

Assume AC, let T>0, and let W=(Wt)t≥0 be a standard one-dimensional Brownian motion. Set Xt=Wt and let Pt be the law of Xt for 0≤t≤T. Thus P0(A)=1 when a Borel set A contains 0 and P0(A)=0 otherwise. For every t>0, Pt has density

pt(x)=12πte−x2/(2t),st(x)=−xt.

The law P0 has no Lebesgue density, so its marginal score is undefined at t=0. For every cutoff 0<ϵ<T, the score is defined throughout [ϵ,T], and

E∣Wϵ∣2=ϵ,Wϵ⟶0 almost surely as ϵ↓0,Pϵ⇒P0.

Here Pϵ⇒P0 means that ∫f dPϵ→∫f dP0 for every bounded continuous f:R→R. Consequently a score-based procedure requiring an exact marginal score can use this family only after choosing a positive cutoff; the limit at the singular data endpoint is a statement about the laws, not a score value at zero.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, T>0, and a standard one-dimensional Brownian motion W.

[A1]

AC is assumed in the Brownian, normal-law, and deterministic score-sampling interfaces. The Axiom of Choice

[F1]

Brownian motion starts at zero almost surely, has a common full-measure event of continuous paths, and Wt∼N(0,t). Brownian motion

[F2]

For t>0, the law N(0,t) has density (2πt)−1/2e−x2/(2t). A positive-variance normal law has its location-scale density Standard normal and normal laws

[F3]

At a positive finite differentiable density, the marginal score is the spatial derivative of its logarithm. Marginal score function

[F4]

The law of a random element is its probability pushforward. Law or distribution of a random element

[F5]

Almost-everywhere convergence under an integrable bound implies convergence of integrals. Dominated convergence

[F6]

Weak convergence of Borel probability measures is convergence of integrals against every bounded continuous real-valued function. Weak convergence of borel probability measures

Verification

1.1A1F1F2F3F4givenalgebra

By [A1], [F1], and [F2], for each t>0 the law of Wt has the displayed Gaussian density. Differentiation gives ∂xlog⁡pt(x)=−x/t, so [F3] gives the stated score. At t=0, [F1] and [F4] give P0({0})=1. Any measure with a Lebesgue density assigns mass ∫{0}p(x) dx=0 to this singleton, so P0 has no Lebesgue density.

1.2F2algebra

By [F2], changing variables x=ϵz yields E∣Wϵ∣2=∫Rx2e−x2/(2ϵ)2πϵ dx=ϵ∫Rz2e−z2/22π dz=ϵ. For the last equality, integration by parts gives ∫z2e−z2/2dz=∫e−z2/2dz over R: the boundary term −ze−z2/2 tends to 0 at both ends, and the normalized standard-normal density integrates to 1. Hence the second moment tends to zero.

2.1F1F4F5F6step 1.1given∎

Fix any sequence ϵn>0 with ϵn→0. On the common continuity event from [F1], Wϵn→W0=0, so for bounded continuous f, f(Wϵn)→f(0) almost surely and ∣f(Wϵn)∣≤∥f∥∞. Applying [F5] gives ∫f dPϵn=Ef(Wϵn)→f(0)=∫f dP0. Since this holds for every such sequence, the limit holds as ϵ↓0; [F6] identifies it as Pϵ⇒P0. The positive-time score conclusion in step 1.1 and the absence of a score at zero prove the stated truncation consequence.

ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck pendingOpen item page →

Finite VP noise leaves a terminal-prior mismatch

Example

Assume AC. Fix T>0 and a continuous function β:[0,T]→(0,∞). Let (Ω,F,(Ft)t≥0,P) be a complete filtered probability space with a right-continuous filtration, and let W be an adapted standard one-dimensional Brownian motion such that, for every 0≤s<t, Wt−Ws is independent of Fs and has law N(0,t−s). Put B(t)=∫0tβ(r) dr, X0=0, and

Xt=e−B(t)/2∫0teB(r)/2β(r) dWr,0≤t≤T.

This solves the variance-preserving (VP) stochastic differential equation dXt=−12β(t)Xt dt+β(t) dWt. For t>0, its law Pt has density and score

pt(x)=12πvte−x2/(2vt),st(x)=−xvt,vt=1−e−B(t).

Since β is positive and continuous, 0<B(T)<∞ and 0<vT<1, so PT=N(0,vT)≠N(0,1). The predictor-corrector procedure defined above initializes from the actual terminal law PT; replacing that draw by N(0,1) changes the initial law for this finite schedule. No convergence or solver-error claim follows from this comparison.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, the filtered Brownian motion and schedule β in the Example, and its explicit process X.

[A1]

AC, the usual filtration conditions, and independent Brownian increments relative to the filtration are the hypotheses of the Brownian Itô and deterministic-integral interfaces used below. Continuous Brownian Ito processes The Axiom of Choice

[F1]

A process with pathwise integrable drift and a localized Brownian Itô integral is a continuous Brownian Itô process under the stated filtration conditions. Continuous Brownian Ito processes

[F2]

For a one-dimensional Brownian Itô process and a C1,2 function, Itô's formula adds the drift, diffusion, and half-variance second-derivative terms. One-dimensional Ito formula

[F3]

A deterministic square-integrable Itô integrand has a centered normal integral with variance equal to the integral of its square. Deterministic Ito integrals are Gaussian

[F4]

A scalar normal law is the affine image of the standard normal law, and for positive variance v it has density (2πv)−1/2e−x2/(2v). Standard normal and normal laws A positive-variance normal law has its location-scale density

[F5]

At positive finite differentiable density points, the marginal score is the derivative of the log density. Marginal score function

[F6]

The law of a random element is its probability pushforward. Law or distribution of a random element

[F7]

The predictor-corrector procedure's initial draw has law PT. Predictor-corrector sampling for score SDEs

Verification

1.1A1F1F2givenalgebra

Write Kt=∫0teB(r)/2β(r) dWr, whose deterministic integrand is square-integrable because B and β are continuous on [0,T]. Since B′(t)=β(t), apply [F2] to f(t,x)=e−B(t)/2x and the continuous Itô process Kt. The product rule gives dXt=−12β(t)Xt dt+β(t) dWt and X0=0.

1.2F3F4givenalgebra

By [F3], Kt is centered normal with variance ∫0teB(r)β(r) dr. Differentiating eB(r) gives ddreB(r)=eB(r)β(r), so this variance is eB(t)−1. Multiplication by e−B(t)/2 therefore gives Xt∼N(0,e−B(t)(eB(t)−1))=N(0,vt). For t>0, positivity of β implies vt>0; [F4] supplies its displayed density.

2.1F4F5givenstep 1.2algebra

Differentiating the density in step 1.2 gives ∂xlog⁡pt(x)=−x/vt, so [F5] yields the score for every t>0. At t=0, X0=0 almost surely; its law assigns mass one to {0} and therefore has no Lebesgue density, since every Lebesgue-density measure assigns zero mass to that singleton.

3.1F4F6F7step 1.2step 2.1givenalgebra∎

Continuity of β on the compact interval makes B(T) finite, and strict positivity gives B(T)>0. Hence vT=1−e−B(T) lies strictly between zero and one. For any v>0, the density in [F4] and the substitution x=vz give ∫Rx2e−x2/(2v)2πv dx=v∫Rz2e−z2/22π dz=v. Indeed integration by parts yields ∫z2e−z2/2dz=∫e−z2/2dz over R, because ze−z2/2→0 at both ends, and the normalized standard-normal density integrates to one. Thus EPTX2=vT by step 1.2, whereas EN(0,1)Z2=1. If the laws were equal these finite second moments would be equal, a contradiction. Step 2.1 shows the exact positive-time score is available at T, and [F7] prescribes initialization from PT; replacing it by N(0,1) changes that initial law.

4 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

None yet.

Sources