Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Alternating diagrams and crossing-number minimality — Examples and Counterexamples

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Logical flowchart

3 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

None yet.

4 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

CounterexampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)verified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

A nugatory kink defeats crossing minimality

Statement refuted

Assume full AC. The positive one-crossing type-I kink of the unknot is connected and alternating but not reduced; its diagram has one crossing while the represented unknot has crossing number zero, and its normalized library Jones polynomial has t-span zero.

positivetype-Ikink

The arrows orient the single component; at the central crossing, the diagonal from northwest to southeast is over and the southwest-to-northeast diagonal has a gap.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Full AC, the positive type-I kink diagram D+ of the unknot, and the bracket and Jones conventions in the statement.

[F1]

A crossing contributes A for its A-smoothing and A−1 for its B-smoothing, a state with k circles contributes δk−1, and δ=−A2−A−2 (Kauffman bracket smoothing and loop value).

[F2]

The positive geometric crossing has sign +1, and writhe is the sum of crossing signs (Oriented crossing signs, diagram writhe, and blackboard framing).

[F3]

A connected diagram has connected projection graph, alternation switches over-under at successive visits, and reducedness excludes a crossing repeated on a region boundary (Reduced alternating link diagram).

[F4]

A type-I Reidemeister move is realized by an ambient isotopy of the represented link (Each oriented Reidemeister move is realized by an ambient isotopy).

[F5]

Under full AC, the normalized bracket state sum specializes to the library Jones polynomial by VK(t)=fK(t−1/4) with t=A−4 (The bracket state sum matches the library Jones specialization).

[F6]

The crossing number is the least crossing count among regular diagrams of the same underlying unoriented link type (Crossing number of a link).

[A1]

Full AC is the choice-function principle for arbitrary families of nonempty sets (The Axiom of Choice).

Counterexample

technique · direct
1.1givenF1constructalgebra

The two states of a positive kink consist of an A-smoothing that leaves the original arc and creates one trivial circle, and a B-smoothing that leaves only the original arc. By [F1] their total bracket factor is Aδ+A−1=A(−A2−A−2)+A−1=−A3, so ⟨D+⟩=−A3.

2.1A1F2F3F5step 1.1algebra

The kink has one positive crossing, so [F2] gives wr⁡(D+)=1. Its normalized bracket is fD+(A)=(−A3)−1(−A3)=1. By [A1] and [F5], the library Jones polynomial is therefore 1, whose t-span is 0. The one-crossing projection is connected; its unique component visits the crossing once over and once under, so it is alternating; the exterior region has the crossing twice on its boundary, so it is not reduced by [F3].

3.1F4F6givenstep 2.1algebra∎

By [F4], the type-I move carries D+ to the crossing-free unknot diagram. Thus the represented link has a diagram with zero crossings. Since crossing counts are nonnegative by [F6], its crossing number is zero, strictly less than the one crossing in D+. This verifies the claimed failure of crossing minimality at a non-reduced alternating diagram.

ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)verified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

Trefoil and figure-eight Jones spans

Example

Assume full AC. The positive trefoil is represented by the closure of the three-crossing two-strand braid σ13; its library Jones polynomial is t+t3−t4, of span 4−1=3, and the corresponding connected reduced alternating diagram has crossing number 3. The figure-eight knot is represented by the closure of the four-crossing three-strand braid whose levels from bottom to top are σ2−1,σ1,σ2−1,σ1; its library Jones polynomial is t−2−t−1+1−t+t2, of span 2−(−2)=4, and the corresponding connected reduced alternating diagram has crossing number 4. The convention is t=A−4.

trefoilTaitgraphb1b2¯gure-eightTaitgraphuvw

These are black Tait graphs; the white graphs are their plane duals. Each graph edge represents one crossing of the corresponding projected diagram.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Full AC, the two braid closures specified in the example, and the source-chart bracket convention.

[F1]

A positive braid crossing expands as AI+A−1ei and a negative one as A−1I+Aei, where I is through and ei is cup-cap (Bracket smoothings of positive and negative braid crossings).

[F2]

For each state S, the bracket contribution is Aa(S)−b(S)δ∣S∣−1, with δ=−A2−A−2 (Kauffman bracket smoothing and loop value).

[F3]

The positive Artin generator has writhe sign +1, and the negative generator has sign −1 (Oriented crossing signs, diagram writhe, and blackboard framing, The elementary geometric half twist, its support disc, and its opposite).

[F4]

Components of a geometric braid closure correspond to cycles of its endpoint permutation (The closure of a geometric braid).

[F5]

A connected reduced alternating knot diagram with c crossings has Jones span c and realizes crossing number c (Jones span detects crossing number for reduced alternating knots).

[F6]

A diagram is reduced when no region repeats a crossing on its boundary; connected alternating diagrams admit checkerboard colorings and have connected Tait graphs (Reduced alternating link diagram, Checkerboard coloring and Tait graphs, The Tait graphs of a connected projection are connected).

[F7]

Under full AC, VK(t)=fK(t−1/4) with t=A−4 and fD(A)=(−A3)−wr⁡(D)⟨D⟩ (The bracket state sum matches the library Jones specialization).

[A1]

Full AC is the choice-function principle for arbitrary families of nonempty sets (The Axiom of Choice).

Proof

1.1F3F4F6construct

For the closure of σ13, the endpoint permutation is the transposition of the two strands, hence one cycle by [F4]. The three positive crossings form a connected projection. Starting on the left bottom strand, the successive crossing visits are under, over, under; after closure the right bottom strand visits over, under, over. Thus the diagram is alternating. Its black Tait graph has two vertices and three parallel edges, while the white dual graph is a triangle. Both graphs have no loops, so no crossing repeats a region on its boundary; the diagram is reduced by [F6].

1.2F3F4F6construct

For the four-level braid with levels σ2−1,σ1,σ2−1,σ1, the successive endpoint orders are [1,3,2], [3,1,2], [3,2,1], and [2,3,1]. The resulting endpoint permutation is the cycle 1↦3↦2↦1, so the closure is one knot component by [F4]. Traversing it from the first bottom strand gives crossing visits under, over; from the third bottom strand gives under, over, under; and from the second gives over, under, over. The full cyclic sequence alternates. The black Tait graph is the theta graph with two parallel edges between u,v and a two-edge path u−w−v; it has no loops or bridges. Its dual has no loops because the primal has no bridges. Thus both color pairs at every crossing are distinct and the diagram is reduced by [F6].

2.1A1F1F2F3F5F7step 1.1algebra

If exactly k of the three positive crossings use the B-smoothing, the states and circle counts are: k=0: 1 state with 2 circles; k=1: 3 states with 1 circle; k=2: 3 states with 2 circles; k=3: 1 state with 3 circles. Stacking through pairings and cup-cap pairings and closing the two top endpoints to the corresponding bottom endpoints gives these counts. By [F1]–[F2], the grouped contributions are A3δ+3A+3A−1δ+A−3δ2=A−7−A−3−A5. The writhe is 3 by [F3], so [F7] gives V31(t)=(−A3)−3(A−7−A−3−A5)∣t=A−4=t+t3−t4. Its span is 3, and [F5] gives crossing number 3.

3.1A1F1F2F3F5F7step 1.2algebra∎

Encode a state by four bits from bottom to top, with 0 meaning through pairing and 1 meaning cup-cap pairing. Let p be the number of cup-cap choices at positive crossings and q the number at negative crossings; [F1] gives weight exponent 2(q−p). Closing the pairings gives the exhaustive state data statecirclesexponent00003000012−200102200111001002−201013−401101001112−210002210011010103410112211001011012−2111022111110. Thus the five one-circle states contribute 5, the eight two-circle states contribute 4(A2+A−2)δ, and the three three-circle states contribute (1+A4+A−4)δ2. Expanding δ=−A2−A−2 gives ⟨DF⟩=5+4(A2+A−2)δ+(1+A4+A−4)δ2=A8−A4+1−A−4+A−8. There are two positive and two negative crossings, so writhe is 0 by [F3]. By [F7], V41(t)=t−2−t−1+1−t+t2, whose span is 4. Applying [F5] gives crossing number 4.

Sources