Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The knot-complement theorem — Examples and Counterexamples

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Logical flowchart

3 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

None yet.

4 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

A meridian-preserving longitude twist extends over a solid torus

Example

Let V=D2×S1 have boundary meridian μ=∂D2×{1} and longitude λ={1}×S1. The boundary matrix A=(1201) sends μ↦μ and λ↦2μ+λ. Its induced torus homeomorphism extends over V by (z,w)↦(w2z,w) and preserves orientation.

The displayed rectangle is a two-unit-square window in the universal cover R2 of the torus R2/Z2, with horizontal coordinate μ and vertical coordinate λ. The identifications are (x,y)∼(x+m,y+n) for all integers m,n, so each unit square is a fundamental domain. The red lifted segment ends at (2,1) and therefore represents the image 2μ+λ of the longitude. The picture illustrates the slope convention only; the verification computes the map directly.

¹¸2¹+¸universal-coverrectangle

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The product solid torus V=D2×S1 and its meridian-longitude basis (μ,λ).

[F1]

A torus map carrying the meridian slope to itself extends over the solid torus. A meridian-preserving torus homeomorphism extends over a solid torus

Verification

1.1givenconstructalgebra

The matrix A is integral with determinant 1, so its linear map on R2/Z2 is a torus homeomorphism. Its first column is (1,0), hence it sends μ to μ, and its second column is (2,1), hence it sends λ to 2μ+λ.

2.1givenstep 1.1construct

Define F:V→V by F(z,w)=(w2z,w). Since ∣w∣=1, this maps D2×S1 to itself, and its inverse is (z′,w′)↦((w′)−2z′,w′). Thus F is a homeomorphism. On the meridian it has degree 1; on the longitude it winds twice in the disk angle and once in the circle coordinate, giving the same matrix A.

3.1F1step 2.1algebra∎

The disk rotation z↦w2z varies continuously with w and contributes no orientation reversal; the circle coordinate is unchanged. Hence F preserves the product orientation and is the required extension. This also instantiates [F1].

CounterexampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)verified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

Abelianized peripheral data do not distinguish the unknot from the trefoil

Statement refuted

Assume the Axiom of Choice. The false assertion is that the abelianized peripheral system (H1(EK;Z),[μ],[λ]) determines the ambient-equivalence class of every smooth knot K⊂S3, where [μ] is the positive meridian class and [λ] is the preferred longitude class.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The crossing-free unknot diagram, the standard three-crossing trefoil, their compact exteriors and peripheral curves.

[A1]

Full AC is the assertion that every set-indexed family of nonempty sets has a choice function. The Axiom of Choice

[F1]

For any chosen complement basepoint and the diagram's common upper-collar access paths, the Wirtinger presentation uses one positive-meridian generator for each under-arc and one crossing conjugacy relation for each crossing, and identifies the presented group with the based complement fundamental group. Correctness of the Wirtinger presentation

[F2]

The trefoil group based at the upper-collar basepoint specified in the trefoil computation is nonabelian and has abelianization Z. The trefoil group is nonabelian with abelianization Z

[F3]

Under countable choice, for every smooth knot H1(EK;Z)≅Z is generated by [μ], and the preferred longitude satisfies [λ]=0. Homology and preferred longitude of a knot exterior

[F4]

Ambient equivalence is given by an ambient isotopy of S3, whose final diffeomorphism restricts to a homeomorphism of knot complements. Oriented links in the three-sphere and ambient isotopy

[F5]

Based loop classes form a group under concatenation. A homeomorphism sends loops and endpoint-fixed homotopies to loops and endpoint-fixed homotopies, preserves concatenation, and its inverse induces the inverse group map. Based loops and the fundamental group Loop classes form the group π1(X,x0) under concatenation

[L1]

Full AC [A1] supplies the countable-choice hypothesis of [F3] by restricting its choice function to each countable family of nonempty sets. The Axiom of Choice

Counterexample

1.1givenF1F2F4F5algebra

The crossing-free unknot diagram has one under-arc and no crossings, so [F1] gives a one-generator presentation with no relators and hence π1(S3∖U,u0)≅Z for any chosen complement basepoint u0. Let x0 be the trefoil basepoint in [F2]. If U and T were ambient equivalent, let H be the final diffeomorphism of that ambient isotopy and choose u0=H−1(x0). By [F4] and [F5], H would induce an isomorphism π1(S3∖U,u0)≅π1(S3∖T,x0). This contradicts [F2], so the knots are not ambient equivalent.

2.1A1F3L1step 1.1algebra∎

By [A1] and [L1], the countable-choice hypothesis of [F3] holds for both knots. Each abelianized peripheral system has H1≅Z with the meridian as generator and preferred longitude zero. The isomorphism sending [μU] to [μT] therefore sends the complete decorated triple (H1,[μ],[λ]) for U to that for T. The systems agree although the knots do not, refuting the assertion.

Sources