Alphabeta Math
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Symplectic geometry and canonical methods — Examples

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

Worked checks for cm13-symplectic-geometry-and-canonical-methods. Fundamental brackets and Bracket evolution on explicit one-label data: {xa,H}=pa/m, {pa,H}=−Uxa, and the oscillator check evaluates the bracket and the evolution law on one-label data of the force branch, where {xa,H}=m−1pa and {pa,H}=−Uxa, and checks the oscillator case of the derived bracket algebra. The isotropic oscillator of the model: explicit solution, the determinant and matrix tests on each two-dimensional block, and the area and energy checks carries the isotropic oscillator through its explicit flow, verifying the matrix and determinant tests of canonicity on each two-dimensional block and the area and energy checks of the motion. The free particle of the model: the flow Q=q+(t/m)p generated by the first-kind function St(q,Q)=−m∣Q−q∣2/(2t), the projection check and the exact change of λ exhibits the free-particle flow Q=q+(t/m)p as generated by the first-kind action function St(q,Q)=−m∣Q−q∣2/(2t), with the projection check and the exact change of the canonical one-form. The point transformation of the model: the chart transition (q,π)↦(X(q),DX(q)−Tπ) is generated in the second kind, has a nowhere invertible (q,Q)-projection, and is contrasted with the momentum shift generates the point-transformation chart transition (q,π)↦(X(q),DX(q)−Tπ), from generalized momentum π to Cartesian momentum, using the second-kind action function S(q,P)=P⋅X(q). It shows that the (q,Q)-projection is nowhere invertible, so the local converse's invertible-projection hypothesis cannot be dropped; the momentum shift supplies the contrast. Determinant tests on explicit linear maps: det⁡A=1 is equivalent to canonicity in dimension two, and strictly weaker in dimension four (the volume-preserving shear) proves on explicit linear maps that det⁡A=1 is equivalent to canonicity in dimension two but strictly weaker in dimension four, by the volume-preserving shear with {Q2,P1}=1. The velocity-Verlet step of the model's mechanical splitting is a canonical map of the presentation: exact flows of the drift and kick, unit determinant, and the oscillator check verifies that the velocity-Verlet step of the model's mechanical splitting is a canonical map of the presentation: the drift and kick are exact flows with unit determinant, their composite preserves the two-form, and the oscillator instance is computed explicitly.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, postulates, theorems and proofs

None yet.

5 · Examples, experiments and counterexamples

ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passOpen item page →

Fundamental brackets and Bracket evolution on explicit one-label data: {xa,H}=pa/m, {pa,H}=−Uxa, and the oscillator check

Physical scope

A worked computation of the bracket of a declared one-label potential presentation: the fundamental brackets of the canonical coordinates, the bracket of the coordinates with the branch Hamiltonian reproducing velocity and force, and the evolution identity and energy constancy on the isotropic oscillator instance. All quantities are model values of the declared idealization; no measurement is reported.

Example

Declare the one-label model of the force branch Adopted force model: force maps, the equation of motion, additive composition of force contributions and frame covariance with N=1, mass m>0, time window I0=R, configuration domain Q=R3, a C2 potential U:R×Q→R and no residual forces (Configuration domain of N labeled particles: open admissible sets, regular holonomic constraints and the mass operator, Potential presentations of a force model, potential and mechanical energy, closed versus exact force fields, local potentials and equipotential level sets, The action functional of a force model with a potential presentation: the mechanical Lagrangian, its chart instance and its dimensions). By Every potential presentation is hyperregular in its charts, with inverse branch v=M−1p (or G(q)−1p) and the explicit kinetic-plus-potential Hamiltonian the presentation is hyperregular on the Cartesian chart with H(t,x,p)=12m−1∣p∣2+U(t,x) (The Hamiltonian of a hyperregular potential presentation: the Legendre transform of the mechanical Lagrangian, its domain and its dimensions), the two-form is ω=∑a=13dxa∧dpa (The canonical one-form and the two-form of a potential presentation: λ=p⋅dx on the Cartesian momentum phase chart and the induced forms on each generalized-coordinate chart, The two-form of a potential presentation is closed and nondegenerate, and each generalized-coordinate momentum chart carries the same symplectic structure: ΦX∗λ=∑Pa dqa and ΦX∗ω=∑dqa∧dPa) and the bracket is The Poisson bracket of phase functions of a potential presentation: {f,g}=ω(Xf,Xg) and the coordinate formula in each canonical chart. Then:

  1. the canonical coordinates satisfy the fundamental brackets {xa,xb}=0, {pa,pb}=0 and {xa,pb}=δba for all a,b∈{1,2,3} (The bracket of a potential presentation is bilinear, skew, a derivation in each slot, satisfies the Jacobi identity, and reproduces the fundamental brackets and the Hamiltonian field clause 5);
  2. the brackets of the coordinates with the Hamiltonian recover the model's velocities and forces: {xa,H}=Hpa=m−1pa and {pa,H}=−Hxa=−Uxa(t,x); hence Hamilton's equations read x˙a={xa,H}, p˙a={pa,H} (The bracket of a potential presentation is bilinear, skew, a derivation in each slot, satisfies the Jacobi identity, and reproduces the fundamental brackets and the Hamiltonian field clause 4, Cartesian model motions on the potential branch and declared generalized-coordinate Lagrange equations integrate their Hamiltonian fields; the forced Cartesian field is Hamiltonian exactly when the residual force has a velocity-independent potential clause 1);
  3. along every solution of the Hamiltonian system and for every C1 phase function f, ddtf(t,x(t),p(t))=∂tf+{f,H} (Evolution of phase functions along the model's Hamiltonian solutions: df/dt=∂tf+{f,H}, the first-integral criterion, and the closed bracket algebra of autonomous first integrals clause 1);
  4. on the isotropic oscillator instance U(x)=12k∣x∣2 with k>0, one has {pa,H}=−kxa and {H,H}=0, and every solution of the Hamiltonian system has constant H=12m−1∣p∣2+12k∣x∣2 on its domain, the Hamiltonian form of the model's energy conservation (Evolution of phase functions along the model's Hamiltonian solutions: df/dt=∂tf+{f,H}, the first-integral criterion, and the closed bracket algebra of autonomous first integrals clause 2, Every potential presentation is hyperregular in its charts, with inverse branch v=M−1p (or G(q)−1p) and the explicit kinetic-plus-potential Hamiltonian).

All quantities are model values of the declared idealization; no measurement is reported.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The one-label model with its potential, the branch Hamiltonian H and the bracket of the presentation on the Cartesian chart.

[F2]

Bracket, field and equations (The Poisson bracket of phase functions of a potential presentation: {f,g}=ω(Xf,Xg) and the coordinate formula in each canonical chart, The canonical one-form and the two-form of a potential presentation: λ=p⋅dx on the Cartesian momentum phase chart and the induced forms on each generalized-coordinate chart, The two-form of a potential presentation is closed and nondegenerate, and each generalized-coordinate momentum chart carries the same symplectic structure: ΦX∗λ=∑Pa dqa and ΦX∗ω=∑dqa∧dPa, The Hamiltonian field of a phase function for a potential presentation: the unique field Xf with ιXfω=df, and XH=(Hp,−Hx) for the branch Hamiltonian, The bracket of a potential presentation is bilinear, skew, a derivation in each slot, satisfies the Jacobi identity, and reproduces the fundamental brackets and the Hamiltonian field, Cartesian model motions on the potential branch and declared generalized-coordinate Lagrange equations integrate their Hamiltonian fields; the forced Cartesian field is Hamiltonian exactly when the residual force has a velocity-independent potential, The Hamiltonian field of a C2 function on a phase domain is J∇H, and the Poisson bracket is ∑i(∂qif ∂pig−∂pif ∂qig)): {f,g}=∑a(fxagpa−fpagxa), the coordinate functions satisfy the fundamental brackets, {f,g}=Xg(f), and a curve solves the Hamiltonian system exactly when it satisfies x˙=Hp, p˙=−Hx.

[F3]

Evolution identity (Evolution of phase functions along the model's Hamiltonian solutions: df/dt=∂tf+{f,H}, the first-integral criterion, and the closed bracket algebra of autonomous first integrals): along a solution, ddtf(t,z(t))=∂tf(t,z(t))+{ft,Ht}(z(t)) for every C1 phase function f; autonomous functions whose bracket with H vanishes identically are constant along solutions.

Verification

technique · direct. Evaluate the coordinate formula of the bracket on the coordinate functions and on the Hamiltonian, then apply the evolution identity to the oscillator instance
1.1F2F4algebra

Fundamental brackets: by [F2] the bracket of two coordinate functions is computed from their constant or linear derivatives; explicitly {xa,xb}=∑c(δca⋅0−0⋅δcb)=0, {pa,pb}=∑c(0⋅δcb−δac⋅0)=0 and {xa,pb}=∑c(δcaδbc−0)=δba; this is claim 1.

1.2F1F2algebra

Bracket with the Hamiltonian: by [F1] and [F2], {xa,H}=∑b(δbaHpb−0⋅Hxb)=Hpa=m−1pa and {pa,H}=∑b(0⋅Hpb−δabHxb)=−Hxa=−Uxa(t,x), so the Hamilton equations x˙a=Hpa, p˙a=−Hxa read x˙a={xa,H}, p˙a={pa,H}; this is claim 2.

2.1step 1.2F3F4algebra

Evolution and oscillator: [F3] gives claim 3 directly; for the oscillator instance [F4] gives {pa,H}=−kxa and skew-symmetry of [F2] gives {H,H}=0, so by [F3] H is constant along every solution, which is claim 4.

3.1step 1.1step 1.2step 2.1∎

Collecting steps 1.1, 1.2 and 2.1 proves the four claims on the declared data.

ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passOpen item page →

The isotropic oscillator of the model: explicit solution, the determinant and matrix tests on each two-dimensional block, and the area and energy checks

Physical scope

A worked verification of the symplectic and volume-preserving character of the model's Hamiltonian flow on the isotropic oscillator instance: the explicit solution of the one-label model with potential (k/2)∣x∣2, the block matrix identity and unit determinant of its time-t map, the area and six-volume checks on explicit boxes, and the constancy of the oscillator energy. All quantities are model values of the declared idealization; no measurement is reported.

Example

Declare the one-label model of the force branch Adopted force model: force maps, the equation of motion, additive composition of force contributions and frame covariance with N=1, mass m>0, time window R, configuration domain Q=R3, the time-independent potential U(x)=12k∣x∣2 with k>0 and no residual forces (Configuration domain of N labeled particles: open admissible sets, regular holonomic constraints and the mass operator, Potential presentations of a force model, potential and mechanical energy, closed versus exact force fields, local potentials and equipotential level sets, The action functional of a force model with a potential presentation: the mechanical Lagrangian, its chart instance and its dimensions); this is the isotropic oscillator instance. By Every potential presentation is hyperregular in its charts, with inverse branch v=M−1p (or G(q)−1p) and the explicit kinetic-plus-potential Hamiltonian the branch Hamiltonian is

H(x,p)=∣p∣22m+k∣x∣22,ω0:=k/m>0,

The stiffness and angular frequency have dimensions [k]=μτ−2 and [ω0]=τ−1. The grouped phase coordinates are z=(x1,x2,x3,p1,p2,p3), with [xa]=ℓ and [pa]=μℓτ−1; hence the six-dimensional phase-volume unit is [ω∧3/3!]=(μℓ2τ−1)3, action cubed.

on the Cartesian phase domain R6, with the two-form ω=∑a=13dxa∧dpa (The canonical one-form and the two-form of a potential presentation: λ=p⋅dx on the Cartesian momentum phase chart and the induced forms on each generalized-coordinate chart, The two-form of a potential presentation is closed and nondegenerate, and each generalized-coordinate momentum chart carries the same symplectic structure: ΦX∗λ=∑Pa dqa and ΦX∗ω=∑dqa∧dPa) and the Hamiltonian field XH=(M−1p,−∇xU) (The Hamiltonian field of a phase function for a potential presentation: the unique field Xf with ιXfω=df, and XH=(Hp,−Hx) for the branch Hamiltonian, Cartesian model motions on the potential branch and declared generalized-coordinate Lagrange equations integrate their Hamiltonian fields; the forced Cartesian field is Hamiltonian exactly when the residual force has a velocity-independent potential). Then:

  1. for every initial datum (x,p) the curve

xa(t)=xacos⁡(ω0t)+pamω0sin⁡(ω0t),pa(t)=−mω0xasin⁡(ω0t)+pacos⁡(ω0t)(a=1,2,3)

solves the Hamiltonian system for all t∈R; 2. in the grouped order z=(x,p) its derivative is DΦt=(cI3(mω0)−1sI3−mω0sI3cI3),c=cos⁡(ω0t),s=sin⁡(ω0t), and for Jgr=(0I3−I30) direct block multiplication gives DΦtTJgrDΦt=Jgr because c2+s2=1. If T(x1,x2,x3,p1,p2,p3)=(x1,p1,x2,p2,x3,p3) is the permutation to interleaved order, then TDΦtT−1=diag⁡(A,A,A) and TJgrT−1=diag⁡(J2,J2,J2), where A=(c(mω0)−1s−mω0sc); each block satisfies ATJ2A=J2 and det⁡A=1. Therefore det⁡DΦt=(det⁡A)3=1, so the time-t map is canonical (The Hamiltonian evolution of a potential presentation preserves the two-form, the bracket and the determinant on its actual time-slice domains, also when the Hamiltonian depends on time, A C1 map between phase domains preserves the standard two-form iff DCTJ DC=J, and a canonical diffeomorphism carries XH∘C to XH); 3. explicit volume check in the numeric coordinates measured in the declared SI units: the image of the unit square [0,1]2⊆{(x1,p1)} under A is the parallelogram with area ∣det⁡A∣=1, and the image of the box [0,1]3×[0,1]3 has numeric six-volume ∣det⁡DΦt∣=1, corresponding to physical phase-volume dimension action cubed; 4. the energy is constant along the flow, H(x(t),p(t))=H(x,p), and {H,H}=0 (Evolution of phase functions along the model's Hamiltonian solutions: df/dt=∂tf+{f,H}, the first-integral criterion, and the closed bracket algebra of autonomous first integrals clause 2).

All quantities are model values of the declared idealization; no measurement is reported.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The one-label isotropic oscillator instance with its Hamiltonian, field, two-form and bracket, and the displayed curve t↦(x(t),p(t)).

[F2]
[F4]

Evolution identity (Evolution of phase functions along the model's Hamiltonian solutions: df/dt=∂tf+{f,H}, the first-integral criterion, and the closed bracket algebra of autonomous first integrals, The Poisson bracket of phase functions of a potential presentation: {f,g}=ω(Xf,Xg) and the coordinate formula in each canonical chart): along any solution of the Hamiltonian system, ddtf(x(t),p(t))={f,H}(x(t),p(t)) for autonomous C1 functions, and autonomous functions whose bracket with H vanishes identically are constant along solutions.

Verification

technique · direct. Differentiate the displayed formulas, verify the two block identities by matrix multiplication, evaluate the determinant and the constancy of the energy
1.1F1F2F3algebra

The curve solves the system: differentiating the displayed formula with the derivatives of [F3] gives x˙a=−xaω0sin⁡+pamcos⁡=m−1pa(t) and p˙a=−mω02xacos⁡−ω0pasin⁡=−kxa(t) because mω02=k; by [F2] this is exactly the Hamiltonian system, which proves claim 1.

1.2F2F3algebra

Grouped-order canonical identity: with c=cos⁡(ω0t) and s=sin⁡(ω0t), the derivative is Mt=(cI3(mω0)−1sI3−mω0sI3cI3) and Jgr=(0I3−I30). Block multiplication gives MtTJgrMt=(0(c2+s2)I3−(c2+s2)I30)=Jgr. Under the declared permutation T from grouped to interleaved order, TMtT−1=diag⁡(A,A,A), so det⁡Mt=(det⁡A)3=(c2+s2)3=1. Thus the full six-dimensional derivative is canonical in the grouped coordinates and has unit determinant, proving claim 2.

2.1step 1.2F1F3F4algebra

Volume checks and energy: on each coordinate pair (xa,pa) the linear action is A, so the unit square maps to the parallelogram spanned by its columns and has numeric area ∣det⁡A∣=1. The permutation T in claim 2 identifies the grouped map with the product of these three pair maps; permutation does not change determinant, so the numeric six-volume of the unit box is ∣det⁡DΦt∣=∣det⁡A∣3=1, which is one unit of action cubed under the declared SI coordinate scales (claim 3). For the energy, [F4] and {H,H}=0 give constancy of H along the curve, and the direct computation ∣p(t)∣2=m2ω02∣x∣2s2−2mω0(x⋅p)cs+∣p∣2c2, ∣x(t)∣2=∣x∣2c2+2(x⋅p)mω0cs+∣p∣2m2ω02s2 gives H(x(t),p(t))=∣p∣22m+k∣x∣22=H(x,p) after substituting k=mω02, the mixed terms cancelling; this proves claim 4.

3.1step 1.1step 1.2step 2.1∎

Collecting steps 1.1, 1.2 and 2.1 proves the four claims on the declared data.

ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passOpen item page →

The free particle of the model: the flow Q=q+(t/m)p generated by the first-kind function St(q,Q)=−m∣Q−q∣2/(2t), the projection check and the exact change of λ

Physical scope

A worked generating-function computation for the declared one-label free-particle presentation: the explicit free Hamiltonian flow, its first-kind generating function St with the mixed-Hessian determinant, the invertibility of the (q,Q)-projection for t≠0, the degeneration of the generating data at t=0, and the exact change of the canonical one-form along the flow. All quantities are model values of the declared idealization; no measurement is reported.

Example

Declare the one-label model of the force branch Adopted force model: force maps, the equation of motion, additive composition of force contributions and frame covariance with N=1, mass m>0, time window R, configuration domain Q=R3, zero potential U≡0 and no residual forces (the free particle instance, Configuration domain of N labeled particles: open admissible sets, regular holonomic constraints and the mass operator, Potential presentations of a force model, potential and mechanical energy, closed versus exact force fields, local potentials and equipotential level sets, The action functional of a force model with a potential presentation: the mechanical Lagrangian, its chart instance and its dimensions). By Every potential presentation is hyperregular in its charts, with inverse branch v=M−1p (or G(q)−1p) and the explicit kinetic-plus-potential Hamiltonian the branch Hamiltonian is H(x,p)=∣p∣2/(2m) with Hamiltonian system x˙=m−1p, p˙=0 (The Hamiltonian of a hyperregular potential presentation: the Legendre transform of the mechanical Lagrangian, its domain and its dimensions, Cartesian model motions on the potential branch and declared generalized-coordinate Lagrange equations integrate their Hamiltonian fields; the forced Cartesian field is Hamiltonian exactly when the residual force has a velocity-independent potential). Then:

  1. for every initial datum the maximal solution is

Φt(x,p)=(x+(t/m) p, p)(t∈R),

the free-particle flow of the presentation; 2. for t≠0 the function St(q,Q):=−m2t∣Q−q∣2 is of class C∞ on R3×R3 with [St]=[m][Q−q]2/[t]=μℓ2τ−1 (action), St,qQ=(m/t)I3 invertible everywhere, and the first-kind map it generates is exactly Φt: indeed p=St,q=m(Q−q)/t gives Q=q+(t/m)p, and P=−St,Q=m(Q−q)/t=p; consequently Φt is a canonical map of the presentation with ∣det⁡DΦt∣=1 (Generating functions for a potential presentation: first- and second-kind data generate canonical maps locally, the local converse under an invertible projection, and the time-dependent Hamiltonian K=H+∂tS clauses 1, Generating functions of the first and second kind for a local canonical map, The local map generated by a first- or second-kind generating function is a canonical C2 local diffeomorphism); 3. projection check: the map (q,p)↦(q,Q)=(q,q+(t/m)p) has invertible derivative (I30I3(t/m)I3) for t≠0, while the family degenerates at t=0: St has no value there and the projection becomes singular, so this family does not represent the identity map; 4. the canonical one-form changes by an exact form along the flow: Φt∗λ=λ+t dK with K=∣p∣2/(2m), because Φt∗λ=P⋅dQ=p⋅(dq+(t/m)dp)=λ+(t/m) d(∣p∣2/2); in particular Φt∗dλ=dλ, recovering canonicity directly (The canonical one-form and the two-form of a potential presentation: λ=p⋅dx on the Cartesian momentum phase chart and the induced forms on each generalized-coordinate chart, A C1 map between phase domains preserves the standard two-form iff DCTJ DC=J, and a canonical diffeomorphism carries XH∘C to XH).

All quantities are model values of the declared idealization; no measurement is reported.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The one-label free-particle instance with its Hamiltonian, flow and two-form, the generating datum St, and the canonical one-form λ=∑apadqa of the presentation.

[F3]

Forms and calculus (The canonical one-form and the two-form of a potential presentation: λ=p⋅dx on the Cartesian momentum phase chart and the induced forms on each generalized-coordinate chart, The two-form of a potential presentation is closed and nondegenerate, and each generalized-coordinate momentum chart carries the same symplectic structure: ΦX∗λ=∑Pa dqa and ΦX∗ω=∑dqa∧dPa, Canonical maps of a potential presentation: pullback-preserving immersions and the equal-dimensional determinant and field-transport tests, A C1 map between phase domains preserves the standard two-form iff DCTJ DC=J, and a canonical diffeomorphism carries XH∘C to XH, The pullback of a differential form, A smooth differential k-form, The chain rule for total derivatives: D(g∘f)(a)=Dg(f(a))∘Df(a), Ck Euclidean maps and diffeomorphisms, The Jacobian matrix of partial derivatives and the gradient in the scalar-valued case, Directional derivatives and partial derivatives of a map U⊆Rm→Rn, The total (Fréchet) derivative Df(a) as the linear first-order approximation with o(∥h∥2) remainder, Rectangular matrix multiplication and the identity matrix In, including zero-sized shapes, The transpose AT of a matrix, Linear map between vector spaces over the same field, Invertible matrices and the general linear group GL⁡n(F), A positive-sized square matrix over a commutative ring is invertible if and only if its determinant is a unit, For n≥1, the determinant over a commutative ring by the Leibniz formula, and ∣det⁡A∣ for a real matrix, The Euclidean inner product ⟨x,y⟩=∑k<nxkyk on Rn): the canonical one-form of the presentation is λ=∑apadqa and pulls back as displayed, the canonical two-form is in canonical coordinates, and the algebraic and differential computations of the example use the ordinary product, chain and mixed-partial rules; a block matrix with invertible diagonal blocks is invertible.

Verification

technique · direct. Verify the explicit solution, compute the mixed Hessian and the generated map of $S_{t}$, check the projection matrix, and pull back the canonical one-form
1.1F1algebra

The displayed curve has x˙=m−1p and p˙=0, hence solves the Hamiltonian system for all t, so by the solutions clause of [F1] it is the free-particle flow; this is claim 1.

1.2F2F3algebra

Mixed Hessian and generated map: St,q(q,Q)=−m2t⋅2(Q−q)⋅(−1)=mt(Q−q), so St,qQ=mtI3 is invertible for t≠0; the first-kind relations of [F2] read p=St,q=mt(Q−q) and P=−St,Q=mt(Q−q)=p, hence Q=q+tmp and P=p: the generated map is Φt; by [F2] it is canonical with unit determinant, which is claim 2.

2.1step 1.2F3algebra

Projection and degeneration: the derivative of (q,p)↦(q,Q) is the displayed block matrix with invertible diagonal blocks I3 and (t/m)I3 for t≠0, so the projection is invertible there; at t=0 the function St is undefined and the lower-right block vanishes, so the projection is singular, and no member of the family represents the identity map; this is claim 3.

2.2step 1.2F2F3algebra

Pullback of the one-form: Φt∗λ=P⋅dQ with Q=q+(t/m)p and P=p, so Φt∗λ=p⋅(dq+(t/m)dp)=λ+(t/m) d(∣p∣2/2)=λ+t dK by the chain rule and the symmetry of the Euclidean product [F3]; differentiating gives Φt∗dλ=dλ, and the matrix identity of claim 2 was already computed; this is claim 4.

3.1step 1.1step 1.2step 2.1step 2.2∎

Collecting steps 1.1, 1.2, 2.1 and 2.2 proves the four claims on the declared data.

ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passOpen item page →

The point transformation of the model: the chart transition (q,π)↦(X(q),DX(q)−Tπ) is generated in the second kind, has a nowhere invertible (q,Q)-projection, and is contrasted with the momentum shift

Physical scope

A worked projection and generating-function computation for the declared potential presentation: a genuine chart X of the configuration domain induces the momentum chart transition from generalized momentum π to Cartesian momentum P, (q,π)↦(X(q),DX(q)−Tπ), generated in the second kind by the action-dimensioned function S(q,P)=P⋅X(q); the transition has unit determinant and fails the first-kind projection hypothesis identically. The degenerate case is compared with the momentum shift, whose second-kind generating function is global. All quantities are model values of the declared idealization; no measurement is reported.

Example

Declare the one-label model of the force branch Adopted force model: force maps, the equation of motion, additive composition of force contributions and frame covariance with N=1, mass m>0, configuration domain Q=R3, a C2 potential and no residual forces, and let X:Ω→Q be a generalized-coordinate chart of the configuration domain: r=3, X of class C3, DX(q) invertible for every q∈Ω (Generalized-coordinate maps of the model, the substituted Lagrangian, the kinetic metric and generalized forces, Configuration domain of N labeled particles: open admissible sets, regular holonomic constraints and the mass operator, Potential presentations of a force model, potential and mechanical energy, closed versus exact force fields, local potentials and equipotential level sets, The action functional of a force model with a potential presentation: the mechanical Lagrangian, its chart instance and its dimensions). Let the generalized coordinates have declared dimensions [qa]=γa; their conjugate generalized momenta πa=∂L~/∂q˙a have dimensions [πa]=μℓ2τ−1γa−1. The Cartesian positions Xi(q) have dimension ℓ and their conjugate Cartesian momenta Pi have dimension μℓτ−1, by Dimensions and SI unit conventions of the non-relativistic classical mechanics framework and Generalized-coordinate maps of the model, the substituted Lagrangian, the kinetic metric and generalized forces. The induced momentum chart transition of the presentation is

ΦX(q,π)=(X(q), M DX(q)G(q)−1π)=(X(q), DX(q)−Tπ),

the second equality because M DX G−1=DX−T when DX is invertible and G=DXTM DX (The canonical one-form and the two-form of a potential presentation: λ=p⋅dx on the Cartesian momentum phase chart and the induced forms on each generalized-coordinate chart, The momentum of a potential presentation: the fibre derivative of the mechanical Lagrangian, the Cartesian momentum Mv and generalized momenta, Hyperregular potential presentations and their inverse Legendre branches in the model's charts). Then:

  1. the function S(q,P):=P⋅X(q)=∑i=13PiXi(q) on Ω×R3 is of class C3 and has action dimension [S]=[Pi][Xi]=μℓ2τ−1; its mixed derivative matrix SqP is DX(q)T, whose determinant is nonzero. Here P is the new Cartesian momentum, while π is the old generalized momentum. The second-kind relations are π=Sq=DX(q)TP and Q=SP=X(q), so solving for P gives (q,π)↦(X(q),DX(q)−Tπ), exactly ΦX; consequently ΦX is a canonical map of the presentation with ∣det⁡DΦX∣=1 (Generating functions of the first and second kind for a local canonical map, The local map generated by a first- or second-kind generating function is a canonical C2 local diffeomorphism);
  2. determinant check: with the block decomposition in source coordinates (q,π) and target coordinates (Q,P) the derivative is block triangular,

DΦX=(DX(q)0∂q(DX−Tπ)DX(q)−T),det⁡DΦX=det⁡DX(q)⋅det⁡DX(q)−T=1;

  1. the (q,Q)-projection (q,π)↦(q,X(q)) is independent of the momentum and has derivative (I30DX(q)0) of rank 3<6 at every point: it is nowhere invertible. Since a first-kind generating function requires the relation p=Sq(q,Q) to be solvable for Q, i.e. the map (q,Q)↦(q,Sq(q,Q)) to be a local diffeomorphism, the transition ΦX admits no first-kind generating function near any point; the second-kind representation of claim 1 is the available local description (Generating functions of the first and second kind for a local canonical map, A canonical map with invertible (q,Q)-projection is locally generated by a first-kind generating function);
  2. contrast — the Cartesian momentum shift: for a constant c∈R3 of momentum dimension the map C(q,p)=(q,p+c) of the Cartesian chart is canonical trivially (DC=I6), its first-kind projection is degenerate identically, and it has the global second-kind generating function S(q,P)=q⋅(P−c), also of action dimension, since Sq=P−c and SP=q (Generating functions for a potential presentation: first- and second-kind data generate canonical maps locally, the local converse under an invertible projection, and the time-dependent Hamiltonian K=H+∂tS clause 2).

All quantities are model values of the declared idealization; no measurement is reported.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The one-label model with a genuine chart X of the configuration domain, the induced momentum chart transition ΦX, and the generating-function data of the two examples.

[F1]

Chart data and units (Generalized-coordinate maps of the model, the substituted Lagrangian, the kinetic metric and generalized forces, The momentum of a potential presentation: the fibre derivative of the mechanical Lagrangian, the Cartesian momentum Mv and generalized momenta, Hyperregular potential presentations and their inverse Legendre branches in the model's charts, Every potential presentation is hyperregular in its charts, with inverse branch v=M−1p (or G(q)−1p) and the explicit kinetic-plus-potential Hamiltonian, The canonical one-form and the two-form of a potential presentation: λ=p⋅dx on the Cartesian momentum phase chart and the induced forms on each generalized-coordinate chart, The two-form of a potential presentation is closed and nondegenerate, and each generalized-coordinate momentum chart carries the same symplectic structure: ΦX∗λ=∑Pa dqa and ΦX∗ω=∑dqa∧dPa, Configuration domain of N labeled particles: open admissible sets, regular holonomic constraints and the mass operator, Dimensions and SI unit conventions of the non-relativistic classical mechanics framework): X is a C3 immersion with DX(q) invertible, G=DXTMDX, the generalized momentum is π=G(q)q˙ with [πa]=μℓ2τ−1γa−1, and the transition is ΦX(q,π)=(X(q),MDX(q)G(q)−1π)=(X(q),DX(q)−Tπ), whose output is Cartesian momentum of dimension μℓτ−1.

[F2]

Generating functions and their canonical maps (Generating functions of the first and second kind for a local canonical map, The local map generated by a first- or second-kind generating function is a canonical C2 local diffeomorphism, A canonical map with invertible (q,Q)-projection is locally generated by a first-kind generating function, The Euclidean inverse function theorem): a second-kind datum with det⁡SqP≠0 generates a canonical C2 local diffeomorphism via old generalized momentum π=Sq and new Cartesian position Q=SP, with unit determinant; a first-kind datum requires det⁡SqQ≠0, so (q,Q)↦(q,Sq(q,Q)) is a local diffeomorphism. The generating functions have action dimension. For the point transformation the mathematical proposition applies with Oq=Ω and OP=R3, using the standard source and target forms supplied by [F1]; the Cartesian-domain theorem Generating functions for a potential presentation: first- and second-kind data generate canonical maps locally, the local converse under an invertible projection, and the time-dependent Hamiltonian K=H+∂tS clause 2 applies to the momentum shift with Oq=OQ=OP=R3.

Verification

technique · direct. Compute the mixed Hessian of the second-kind datum, generate the map, check the block-triangular determinant, examine the rank of the projection, and generate the momentum shift
1.1F1F2F3algebra

Second-kind generation: by [F3], SPi=Xi(q) and Sqa=∑iPi∂Xi/∂qa, so SqP=DX(q)T has nonzero determinant by [F1]. The generated relations of [F2] are π=DX(q)TP and Q=X(q), i.e. P=DX(q)−Tπ and Q=X(q): this is ΦX, canonical with unit determinant and with [S]=[PiXi]=μℓ2τ−1; claim 1.

1.2F2F3algebra

Momentum shift: for C(q,p)=(q,p+c) the derivative is the identity, so DCTJ DC=J and the map is canonical; with S(q,P)=q⋅(P−c) one has Sq=P−c and SP=q, so [F2] gives p=P−c, Q=q, i.e. C, with det⁡SqP=det⁡I3=1; the first-kind projection (q,p)↦(q,q) is constant in p and hence degenerate; this is claim 4.

2.1step 1.1F3algebra

Determinant check: in the coordinates (q,π) on the source and (Q,P) on the target, the derivative of ΦX is the displayed block-triangular matrix with diagonal blocks DX(q) and DX(q)−T; because det⁡AT=det⁡A and det⁡(A−1)=(det⁡A)−1, its determinant is det⁡DX⋅(det⁡DX)−1=1, which is claim 2.

2.2step 1.1F2F3algebra

Projection obstruction: the (q,Q)-projection of ΦX sends (q,π) to (q,X(q)), with derivative the displayed block matrix whose second block column vanishes; its rank is at most 3<6, so it is nowhere invertible. By [F2], a first-kind generating function would make (q,Q)↦(q,Sq(q,Q)) a local diffeomorphism whose inverse is exactly this projection, which is impossible; hence no first-kind generating function exists near any point, proving claim 3.

3.1step 1.1step 2.1step 2.2step 1.2∎

Collecting steps 1.1, 2.1, 2.2 and 1.2 proves the four claims on the declared data.

ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passOpen item page →

Determinant tests on explicit linear maps: det⁡A=1 is equivalent to canonicity in dimension two, and strictly weaker in dimension four (the volume-preserving shear)

Example

Let J2=(01−10) and, in the ordered coordinates (q1,p1,q2,p2) of R4, let J4=diag⁡(J2,J2) be the standard symplectic matrix of the phase domain R4 (A phase domain, its canonical one-form and its standard symplectic two-form); recall that a linear map A is canonical exactly when ATJA=J (A C1 map between phase domains preserves the standard two-form iff DCTJ DC=J, and a canonical diffeomorphism carries XH∘C to XH). Then:

  1. (dimension two) For A=(abcd) one has

ATJ2A=(ad−bc) J2=(det⁡A) J2,

so an invertible A is canonical if and only if det⁡A=1: in one degree of freedom canonicity and oriented area preservation coincide. For instance A=(2111) has det⁡A=1 and is canonical. 2. (scaling) For λ≠0 the block-diagonal map C(q,p)=(λq,λ−1p) on the phase domain R2n is canonical: its derivative diag⁡(λIn,λ−1In) satisfies DCTJ DC=J and det⁡DC=1; it even preserves the canonical one-form, C∗λ=λ, because (λ−1p)⋅d(λq)=p⋅dq. 3. (volume preservation is weaker in dimension four) The linear shear

C(q1,q2,p1,p2)=(q1, q2+q1, p1, p2)

is written in grouped coordinates (q1,q2,p1,p2), whose symplectic matrix is Jgrp=(0I2−I20). It has det⁡DC=1, so it preserves volume, but DCTJgrp DC=Jgrp+e1e4T−e4e1T≠Jgrp: the (1,4)-entry is 1 instead of 0. Equivalently the fundamental bracket {Q2,P1}=1 does not vanish, while canonicity would force {Q2,P1}=δ12=0. Hence ∣det⁡DC∣=1 does not imply canonicity in dimension 4. 4. (positive control) If A=diag⁡(A1,A2) in the ordered coordinates (q1,p1,q2,p2) with each 2×2 block satisfying AiTJ2Ai=J2, then ATJ4A=J4: canonicity is preserved blockwise.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The standard symplectic matrices J2 and J4=diag⁡(J2,J2), the displayed linear maps, and the coordinate functions of the phase domains.

[F2]

Verification

technique · direct. Multiply the explicit matrices, read the determinant, and evaluate the fundamental bracket that distinguishes the shear from a canonical map
1.1F1F3algebra

Dimension two: multiplying ATJ2A by [F3] gives (0ad−bc−(ad−bc)0)=(ad−bc)J2; for invertible A this equals J2 exactly when det⁡A=ad−bc=1 by [F1], and A=(2111) has determinant 2−1=1, which is claim 1.

1.2F1F3algebra

Scaling: DC=diag⁡(λIn,λ−1In) computed by [F3], and diag⁡(λIn,λ−1In)TJdiag⁡(λIn,λ−1In) has the off-diagonal blocks λ⋅I⋅λ−1I=In and −λ−1I⋅λI=−In, so it equals J; the determinant is λnλ−n=1, and C∗λ=∑a(λ−1pa)d(λqa)=λ; this is claim 2.

1.3F1F2F3algebra

Shear: the derivative of C computed by [F3] is DC=I4+e2e1T (in grouped coordinates), with det⁡DC=1 because it is triangular with unit diagonal; expanding DCTJgrpDC=(I+e1e2T)Jgrp(I+e2e1T) gives Jgrp+e1e4T−e4e1T, whose (1,4)-entry is 1, so the matrix identity fails; equivalently, by [F2], {Q2,P1}=∑a(Qqa2P1,pa−Qpa2P1,qa)=∂Q2/∂q1⋅∂P1/∂p1=1≠δ12, and canonicity would force the vanishing of this bracket; this is claim 3.

1.4F1F3algebra

Block positive control: in the ordered coordinates J4=diag⁡(J2,J2), so diag⁡(A1,A2)TJ4diag⁡(A1,A2)=diag⁡(A1TJ2A1,A2TJ2A2)=diag⁡(J2,J2)=J4 whenever each block satisfies its two-dimensional identity; this is claim 4.

2.1F1F3step 1.3algebra

Necessity of determinant +1 in dimension four: put ω(v,w)=vTJ4w and define T(v1,v2,v3,v4)=ω(v1,v2)ω(v3,v4)−ω(v1,v3)ω(v2,v4)+ω(v1,v4)ω(v2,v3). Bilinearity and skew-symmetry make T multilinear and alternating (interchanging any adjacent pair negates the displayed expression), and T(e1,e2,e3,e4)=1. Expanding each argument in the coordinate basis therefore gives T(Ae1,Ae2,Ae3,Ae4)=det⁡A by the permutation definition of the determinant. If ATJ4A=J4, each pairing in T is preserved, so that value is T(e1,e2,e3,e4)=1. Thus every canonical A has det⁡A=1, while step 1.3 gives a noncanonical map with determinant 1. The grouped-coordinate version has the same determinant by conjugation with the coordinate permutation.

3.1step 1.1step 1.2step 1.3step 1.4step 2.1∎

Collecting steps 1.1-1.4 and 2.1 proves the four claims; in particular the determinant test is equivalent to canonicity in dimension two and strictly weaker in dimension four.

ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passOpen item page →

The velocity-Verlet step of the model's mechanical splitting is a canonical map of the presentation: exact flows of the drift and kick, unit determinant, and the oscillator check

Physical scope

A worked verification that the velocity-Verlet step of the declared one-label potential presentation is a canonical map: the drift and kick are the exact time-h flows of the kinetic and potential parts of the branch Hamiltonian, the composite satisfies the matrix identity in exact arithmetic, and the isotropic-oscillator instance is checked explicitly with unit determinant. All quantities are model values of the declared idealization in exact arithmetic; no measurement or roundoff claim is made.

Example

Declare the one-label model of the force branch Adopted force model: force maps, the equation of motion, additive composition of force contributions and frame covariance with N=1, mass m>0, time window R, configuration domain Q=R3, a time-independent C3 potential U and no residual forces (Configuration domain of N labeled particles: open admissible sets, regular holonomic constraints and the mass operator, Potential presentations of a force model, potential and mechanical energy, closed versus exact force fields, local potentials and equipotential level sets, The action functional of a force model with a potential presentation: the mechanical Lagrangian, its chart instance and its dimensions); by Every potential presentation is hyperregular in its charts, with inverse branch v=M−1p (or G(q)−1p) and the explicit kinetic-plus-potential Hamiltonian the branch Hamiltonian is H(x,p)=∣p∣2/(2m)+U(x) (The Hamiltonian of a hyperregular potential presentation: the Legendre transform of the mechanical Lagrangian, its domain and its dimensions). Consider the mechanical splitting H=A+B with A(x,p)=∣p∣2/(2m) and B(x,p)=U(x), the drift and kick maps

Dh(x,p)=(x+h m−1p, p),Kh(x,p)=(x, p−h∇U(x)),

and the velocity-Verlet map Vh=Kh/2∘Dh∘Kh/2, defined wherever the composition exists (The splitting Hamiltonian H=A+B, the drift and kick maps, and the velocity-Verlet map with the mass matrix M=mI3 and V=U). In this physical presentation h is a time increment with [h]=τ.

For the numerical-error assertion in claim 4, choose reference scales ℓ∗>0, p∗>0, τ∗>0 and use dimensionless coordinates x^=x/ℓ∗, p^=p/p∗, t^=t/τ∗, canonical for the normalized form ω^:=ω/(ℓ∗p∗)=∑idx^i∧dp^i, and the normalized Hamiltonian H^=τ∗H/(ℓ∗p∗), and h^=h/τ∗. The product ℓ∗p∗ has action dimension, so H^ is dimensionless. All error norms and derivative bounds in that claim are those of the dimensionless phase vector z^=(x^,p^) with its ordinary Euclidean norm. In these coordinates H^=12p^TM^−1p^+U^(x^), where M^=(ℓ∗m/(τ∗p∗))I3 is positive and U^(x^)=τ∗U(ℓ∗x^)/(ℓ∗p∗) is C3. For a physical horizon Tphys, write T^=Tphys/τ∗. Write Φ^ and V^h^ for the exact flow and Verlet map of H^ in these normalized variables. Then:

  1. Dh is the exact time-h flow of the Hamiltonian field of A, whose components are XA=(m−1p,0); and Kh is the exact time-h flow of the field of B, XB=(0,−∇U(x)), because along the horizontal trajectory x is constant and the momentum moves at the constant rate −∇U(x);
  2. consequently Vh is a canonical map of the presentation in exact arithmetic: DVhTJ DVh=J and Vh∗ω=ω wherever Vh is defined and C1 (The drift, kick and velocity-Verlet maps are canonical: (DC)TJ DC=J and C∗ω=ω, Canonical maps of a potential presentation: pullback-preserving immersions and the equal-dimensional determinant and field-transport tests, A C1 map between phase domains preserves the standard two-form iff DCTJ DC=J, and a canonical diffeomorphism carries XH∘C to XH); the separate drift and kick maps are canonical as well, and claim 1 identifies them as exact time-h flows of their respective split-component fields;
  3. explicit check on the isotropic oscillator instance U(x)=12k∣x∣2 with k>0 and stiffness dimension [k]=μτ−2: on each coordinate pair,

Vh(q,p)=(q+hmp−h2k2mq,  p−hkq−h2k2mp+h3k24mq),DVh=(1−h2k2mhm−hk+h3k24m1−h2k2m),

and det⁡DVh=(1−h2k2m)2−hm(−hk+h3k24m)=1; in dimension two, det⁡DVh=1 is equivalent to canonicity (Determinant tests on explicit linear maps: det⁡A=1 is equivalent to canonicity in dimension two, and strictly weaker in dimension four (the volume-preserving shear)). In grouped coordinates (x,p) the full derivative has the corresponding 3×3 scalar blocks; under the permutation to interleaved order it is diag⁡(DVh,DVh,DVh) and the canonical matrix is diag⁡(J2,J2,J2). Thus the full matrix identity and determinant-one claim hold on the six-dimensional instance; 4. accuracy and scope. Assume that in the normalized coordinates there are an open bounded convex tube W^ in the phase domain, a nonempty compact set K^⊆W^ and r>0 with K^+B‾r(0)⊆W^, and finite bounds M0=sup⁡W^∥XH^∥2, L1=sup⁡W^∥DXH^∥2 and L2=sup⁡W^∥D2XH^∥2. The local-error lemma then supplies constants h^1>0 and C1<∞. For T^>0, 0<∣h^∣≤h^1, and n∈N with n∣h^∣≤T^, suppose both exact points y^j=Φ^jh^(z^0) and numerical points z^j=V^h^ j(z^0) remain in K^ for every 0≤j≤n. Then the suppliers give ∥V^h^(z^)−Φ^h^(z^)∥2≤C1∣h^∣3 for z^∈K^, and ∥z^n−y^n∥2≤C1h^2(eL^T^−1)/L^ when L^=L1>0, or C1T^h^2 when L^=0 (The velocity-Verlet step matches the exact flow through order two: local truncation error O(h3) on a convex tube, Finite-time global error of the velocity-Verlet method: ∥zn−Φnh(z0)∥≤C(eLT−1)h2/L). The constants depend on the declared normalized tube bounds; the retention and small-step hypotheses are assumptions. Roundoff, all-time energy claims and the holomorphic-domain hypotheses of the analytic estimates are outside this example and are governed by Scope of the certified velocity-Verlet estimates: exact arithmetic, compact tubes, roundoff, and absent all-time claims.

All statements are about exact arithmetic on the declared idealization; no measurement or floating-point claim is made.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The one-label model with its branch Hamiltonian and its mechanical splitting, the drift and kick maps, and the velocity-Verlet composite.

[F2]

Splitting and its canonical maps (The splitting Hamiltonian H=A+B, the drift and kick maps, and the velocity-Verlet map, The drift, kick and velocity-Verlet maps are canonical: (DC)TJ DC=J and C∗ω=ω, Canonical maps of a potential presentation: pullback-preserving immersions and the equal-dimensional determinant and field-transport tests, A C1 map between phase domains preserves the standard two-form iff DCTJ DC=J, and a canonical diffeomorphism carries XH∘C to XH): with A, B, Dh, Kh, Vh=Kh/2∘Dh∘Kh/2 as in the cited definition, DDhTJ DDh=J, DKhTJ DKh=J and DVhTJ DVh=J on the sets where the maps are defined; when their full segments stay in the phase domain, Dh and Kh are the time-h maps of the local flows of the fields of A and B.

[F4]

Error estimates (The velocity-Verlet step matches the exact flow through order two: local truncation error O(h3) on a convex tube, Finite-time global error of the velocity-Verlet method: ∥zn−Φnh(z0)∥≤C(eLT−1)h2/L): after the displayed dimensionless normalization, the local supplier assumes an open bounded convex tube, a compact set with positive tube margin, a C3 potential and finite bounds on XH^ and its first two derivatives; it gives h^1,C1 and the C1∣h^∣3 one-step defect. The finite-time supplier additionally assumes 0<∣h^∣≤h^1, n∣h^∣≤T^, and that both exact and numerical points stay in the compact set at every step; with L^=sup⁡∥DXH^∥, it gives the bound stated in claim 4, including the L^=0 case. Both results are exact-arithmetic mathematical estimates, not error observations.

Verification

technique · direct. Identify the drift and kick with the exact flows of the two parts, apply the canonical-form preservation of the splitting maps, and evaluate the oscillator composite and its determinant
1.1F1F2algebra

On the Cartesian chart the fields are XA=(m−1p,0) and XB=(0,−∇U(x)); the curve t↦(x+tm−1p,p) solves x˙=m−1p, p˙=0, so it is the time-h map Dh of XA, and the curve t↦(x,p−t∇U(x)) solves x˙=0, p˙=−∇U(x), so it is the time-h map Kh of XB; this is claim 1.

1.2F1F2F3algebra

Oscillator composite: for U=12k∣x∣2, ∇U=kx; applying Kh/2, then Dh, then Kh/2 to one coordinate pair gives the displayed update and derivative block A=DVh. Its determinant expands to 1−h2km+h4k24m2+h2km−h4k24m2=1, so the two-dimensional determinant test gives ATJ2A=J2. In grouped order (x,p) the full derivative is Mh=(aI3bI3cI3aI3), where a=1−h2k/(2m), b=h/m, and c=−hk+h3k2/(4m). The permutation to interleaved order conjugates Mh to diag⁡(A,A,A) and the grouped canonical matrix to diag⁡(J2,J2,J2); hence MhTJgrMh=Jgr and det⁡Mh=(det⁡A)3=1. This is claim 3.

1.3givenF4

Accuracy and scope: the instantiated step is the velocity-Verlet map of the splitting data, so [F4] applies and gives the cubic local and quadratic finite-time error statements in exact arithmetic, with the recorded scope limitations; this is claim 4.

2.1F2step 1.1

Canonical character: by [F2] the derivatives of Dh, Kh and their composite Vh satisfy the matrix identity, so each map is canonical and preserves the two-form. Step 1.1 identifies the drift and kick as exact time-h flows of their respective split-component fields; this proves claim 2.

3.1step 1.1step 1.2step 1.3step 2.1∎

Collecting steps 1.1, 1.2, 1.3 and 2.1 proves the four claims on the declared data.

Sources