How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Symplectic geometry and canonical methods — Examples
1 · Prerequisites
- Abelian Categories
- Absolute and Conditional Convergence; Rearrangement; Products
- Algebraic Closure, Embeddings, and Separability
- Algebraic Extensions, Extension Degree, and Finite Fields
- Analyticity of Holomorphic Functions; Liouville and Morera
- Arc Length and Rectifiable Curves
- Binary Operations, Monoids, Groups and Subgroups
- Bounded Variation and the Riemann–Stieltjes Integral
- Categories, Functors and Natural Transformations
- Chain Complexes and Homology
- Cm Math Balances
- Cm Math Canonical
- Cm Math Dynamics
- Cm Math Geometry
- Cm Math Variations
- Compactness
- Compactness in Metric Spaces
- Completeness, Completion, and Uniform Continuity
- Complex Differentiability and the Cauchy–Riemann Equations
- Complex Power Series and Analytic Functions
- Composition Series, the Jordan–Hölder Theorem and Solvable Groups
- Congruences, the Integers Modulo n and the Chinese Remainder Theorem
- Connectedness
- Constant Rank, Submersions, Immersions and Regular Level Sets
- Construction of the Natural Numbers
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Cauchy Sequences
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Dedekind Cuts
- Continuity, IVT, EVT, and Uniform Continuity
- Contour Integration
- Cosets, Index and Lagrange's Theorem
- Countability and Uncountability
- Countability Axioms and Cardinal Functions
- Cyclic Groups and Direct Products
- Determinants of Matrices over a Commutative Ring
- Diagonalisation and the Minimal Polynomial
- Divisibility, Euclidean Domains, Principal Ideal Domains and Unique Factorisation
- Divisibility, Greatest Common Divisors and Bézout's Identity
- Dual Spaces, Bilinear and Quadratic Forms, and Sylvester's Law of Inertia
- Eigenvalues, Eigenvectors and the Characteristic Polynomial
- Euclidean Ordinary Differential Equations with Smooth Dependence
- Exterior Powers, Orientation and Hodge Duality
- Filters and Ultrafilters
- Finite Counting, Factorials and Binomial Coefficients
- Forces, initial data and Newtonian flow
- Foundations of the Real Numbers for Analysis
- Framework, quantities and geometry
- Fubini and Change of Variables
- Function Space Topologies and the Exponential Law
- Fundamental Trigonometric Identities
- Gaussian Elimination, Elementary Matrices and Reduced Row Echelon Form
- Goursat's Theorem and Cauchy's Theorem in a Convex Domain
- Group Actions, Orbits, Stabilisers and Cayley's Theorem
- Group Homomorphisms and the Isomorphism Theorems
- Hamiltonian Mechanics and Completely Integrable Systems
- Hereditary and Productive Behaviour of the Separation Axioms
- Ideals, Quotient Rings and the Isomorphism Theorems for Rings
- Inner Product Spaces, Gram-Schmidt, Projections and Adjoints
- Legendre transformation and Hamiltonian mechanics
- Limits and Colimits
- Limits of Real Functions
- limsup, liminf, and Subsequential Limits
- Line Integrals and the Gradient Theorem
- Linear Independence, Bases and Dimension
- Linear Transformations, Rank-Nullity and Quotient Spaces
- Matrices, the Matrix of a Linear Map, and Change of Basis
- Metric Spaces
- Mixed Partials, Taylor Formulae, and Extrema
- Momentum, work and energy balances
- Monotone Functions, Discontinuities, and Continuity Sets
- Monotone Sequences, Bolzano-Weierstrass, and Cauchy Completeness
- Normal Subgroups and Quotient Groups
- Normed and Banach Spaces
- Norming and Separation under Hahn–Banach
- Order, Zorn's Lemma, and the Axiom of Choice
- Ordinals, Cardinals, and Transfinite Recursion
- Partitions of Unity and Paracompactness
- pi: the Equivalent Characterizations
- Picard-Lindelöf and First-Order Ordinary Differential Equations
- Polynomial Rings, the Division Algorithm and Roots
- Power Series and Real-Analytic Functions
- Preadditive and Additive Categories and Biproducts
- Primes, Euclid's Lemma and the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic
- Properties of the Integral and the Working FTC
- Rank Theorems and Embedded Submanifolds
- Regular constraints and moving frames
- Regular Surfaces and Surface Integrals
- Relations, Functions, and Quotients
- Rings, Subrings, Integral Domains and Fields
- Rⁿ as a Normed Space; Vector-Valued Functions
- Roots, Rational Powers, and Classical Inequalities
- Separation Axioms: the Hierarchy
- Sequences and Limits
- Sequences and Series of Functions; Uniform Convergence
- Series: Convergence and the Nonnegative Tests
- Simple Field Extensions and the Construction of the Complex Numbers
- Sine, Cosine, and the Definition of Pi
- Smooth Manifolds and Smooth Maps
- Smooth Partitions of Unity and Exhaustions
- Smooth Vector Bundles and Sections
- Splitting Fields
- Stationary action and Lagrangian dynamics
- Subspaces, Products, and Quotients
- Suprema and Infima
- Sylow's Theorems, p-Groups and Nilpotent Groups
- Symmetric Groups, Cycle Decomposition and the Sign Homomorphism
- Symplectic geometry and canonical methods
- Symplectic Manifolds, Moser Stability, and Darboux–Weinstein Theory
- Symplectic Verlet and analytic backward error
- Tangent Cotangent and the Differential
- Tensor Fields Exterior Algebra and Differential Forms
- The Cantor Set, Baire Category, and Measure Zero in ℝ
- The Complex Exponential and Euler's Formula
- The De Rham Complex Homotopy and Mayer Vietoris
- The Derivative and the Mean Value Theorems
- The Determinant of a Linear Operator, Cofactors and Cramer's Rule
- The Exponential Function
- The Exterior Derivative and Cartan Calculus
- The Fundamental Theorem of Algebra
- The Fundamental Theorem of Finite Abelian Groups
- The Fundamental Theorems of Calculus
- The Galois Correspondence
- The Inverse and Implicit Function Theorems
- The Inverse Function Theorem Completed
- The Logarithm and General Powers
- The Riemann Integral in Rᵐ and Jordan Content
- The Riemann Integral: Definition and Integrability
- The Spectral Theorem, Positive Operators and Singular Value Decomposition
- The Topology of Euclidean Space
- The Total Derivative in ℝᵐ → ℝⁿ
- The ZFC Axioms and the Basic Set Constructions
- Topological Spaces and Continuity
- Topology of ℝ
- Triangularisation, Generalised Eigenspaces and Jordan Canonical Form
- Vector Fields Flows and Lie Derivatives
- Vector Spaces, Linear Subspaces, Span and Direct Sums
2 · Summary
Worked checks for cm13-symplectic-geometry-and-canonical-methods. Fundamental brackets and Bracket evolution on explicit one-label data: , , and the oscillator check evaluates the bracket and the evolution law on one-label data of the force branch, where and , and checks the oscillator case of the derived bracket algebra. The isotropic oscillator of the model: explicit solution, the determinant and matrix tests on each two-dimensional block, and the area and energy checks carries the isotropic oscillator through its explicit flow, verifying the matrix and determinant tests of canonicity on each two-dimensional block and the area and energy checks of the motion. The free particle of the model: the flow generated by the first-kind function , the projection check and the exact change of exhibits the free-particle flow as generated by the first-kind action function , with the projection check and the exact change of the canonical one-form. The point transformation of the model: the chart transition is generated in the second kind, has a nowhere invertible -projection, and is contrasted with the momentum shift generates the point-transformation chart transition , from generalized momentum to Cartesian momentum, using the second-kind action function . It shows that the -projection is nowhere invertible, so the local converse's invertible-projection hypothesis cannot be dropped; the momentum shift supplies the contrast. Determinant tests on explicit linear maps: is equivalent to canonicity in dimension two, and strictly weaker in dimension four (the volume-preserving shear) proves on explicit linear maps that is equivalent to canonicity in dimension two but strictly weaker in dimension four, by the volume-preserving shear with . The velocity-Verlet step of the model's mechanical splitting is a canonical map of the presentation: exact flows of the drift and kick, unit determinant, and the oscillator check verifies that the velocity-Verlet step of the model's mechanical splitting is a canonical map of the presentation: the drift and kick are exact flows with unit determinant, their composite preserves the two-form, and the oscillator instance is computed explicitly.
3 · Logical flowchart
4 · Definitions, postulates, theorems and proofs
None yet.
5 · Examples, experiments and counterexamples
Fundamental brackets and Bracket evolution on explicit one-label data: , , and the oscillator check
A worked computation of the bracket of a declared one-label potential presentation: the fundamental brackets of the canonical coordinates, the bracket of the coordinates with the branch Hamiltonian reproducing velocity and force, and the evolution identity and energy constancy on the isotropic oscillator instance. All quantities are model values of the declared idealization; no measurement is reported.
Example
Declare the one-label model of the force branch Adopted force model: force maps, the equation of motion, additive composition of force contributions and frame covariance with , mass , time window , configuration domain , a potential and no residual forces (Configuration domain of labeled particles: open admissible sets, regular holonomic constraints and the mass operator, Potential presentations of a force model, potential and mechanical energy, closed versus exact force fields, local potentials and equipotential level sets, The action functional of a force model with a potential presentation: the mechanical Lagrangian, its chart instance and its dimensions). By Every potential presentation is hyperregular in its charts, with inverse branch (or ) and the explicit kinetic-plus-potential Hamiltonian the presentation is hyperregular on the Cartesian chart with (The Hamiltonian of a hyperregular potential presentation: the Legendre transform of the mechanical Lagrangian, its domain and its dimensions), the two-form is (The canonical one-form and the two-form of a potential presentation: on the Cartesian momentum phase chart and the induced forms on each generalized-coordinate chart, The two-form of a potential presentation is closed and nondegenerate, and each generalized-coordinate momentum chart carries the same symplectic structure: and ) and the bracket is The Poisson bracket of phase functions of a potential presentation: and the coordinate formula in each canonical chart. Then:
- the canonical coordinates satisfy the fundamental brackets , and for all (The bracket of a potential presentation is bilinear, skew, a derivation in each slot, satisfies the Jacobi identity, and reproduces the fundamental brackets and the Hamiltonian field clause 5);
- the brackets of the coordinates with the Hamiltonian recover the model's velocities and forces: and ; hence Hamilton's equations read , (The bracket of a potential presentation is bilinear, skew, a derivation in each slot, satisfies the Jacobi identity, and reproduces the fundamental brackets and the Hamiltonian field clause 4, Cartesian model motions on the potential branch and declared generalized-coordinate Lagrange equations integrate their Hamiltonian fields; the forced Cartesian field is Hamiltonian exactly when the residual force has a velocity-independent potential clause 1);
- along every solution of the Hamiltonian system and for every phase function , (Evolution of phase functions along the model's Hamiltonian solutions: , the first-integral criterion, and the closed bracket algebra of autonomous first integrals clause 1);
- on the isotropic oscillator instance with , one has and , and every solution of the Hamiltonian system has constant on its domain, the Hamiltonian form of the model's energy conservation (Evolution of phase functions along the model's Hamiltonian solutions: , the first-integral criterion, and the closed bracket algebra of autonomous first integrals clause 2, Every potential presentation is hyperregular in its charts, with inverse branch (or ) and the explicit kinetic-plus-potential Hamiltonian).
All quantities are model values of the declared idealization; no measurement is reported.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The one-label model with its potential, the branch Hamiltonian and the bracket of the presentation on the Cartesian chart.
Model and Hamiltonian (Every potential presentation is hyperregular in its charts, with inverse branch (or ) and the explicit kinetic-plus-potential Hamiltonian, The Hamiltonian of a hyperregular potential presentation: the Legendre transform of the mechanical Lagrangian, its domain and its dimensions, Potential presentations of a force model, potential and mechanical energy, closed versus exact force fields, local potentials and equipotential level sets, Adopted force model: force maps, the equation of motion, additive composition of force contributions and frame covariance, Configuration domain of labeled particles: open admissible sets, regular holonomic constraints and the mass operator, Dimensions and SI unit conventions of the non-relativistic classical mechanics framework): with and , and dimensions are read by the cited units item.
Bracket, field and equations (The Poisson bracket of phase functions of a potential presentation: and the coordinate formula in each canonical chart, The canonical one-form and the two-form of a potential presentation: on the Cartesian momentum phase chart and the induced forms on each generalized-coordinate chart, The two-form of a potential presentation is closed and nondegenerate, and each generalized-coordinate momentum chart carries the same symplectic structure: and , The Hamiltonian field of a phase function for a potential presentation: the unique field with , and for the branch Hamiltonian, The bracket of a potential presentation is bilinear, skew, a derivation in each slot, satisfies the Jacobi identity, and reproduces the fundamental brackets and the Hamiltonian field, Cartesian model motions on the potential branch and declared generalized-coordinate Lagrange equations integrate their Hamiltonian fields; the forced Cartesian field is Hamiltonian exactly when the residual force has a velocity-independent potential, The Hamiltonian field of a function on a phase domain is , and the Poisson bracket is ): , the coordinate functions satisfy the fundamental brackets, , and a curve solves the Hamiltonian system exactly when it satisfies , .
Evolution identity (Evolution of phase functions along the model's Hamiltonian solutions: , the first-integral criterion, and the closed bracket algebra of autonomous first integrals): along a solution, for every phase function ; autonomous functions whose bracket with vanishes identically are constant along solutions.
Calculus (The Jacobian matrix of partial derivatives and the gradient in the scalar-valued case, Directional derivatives and partial derivatives of a map , Rectangular matrix multiplication and the identity matrix , including zero-sized shapes, The Euclidean inner product on , Euclidean maps and diffeomorphisms, The associated first-order system, motions, maximal motions and the Newtonian flow of a force model): coordinate functions have the displayed partial derivatives, and in the Euclidean product, and the oscillator equation is .
Verification
Fundamental brackets: by [F2] the bracket of two coordinate functions is computed from their constant or linear derivatives; explicitly , and ; this is claim 1.
Bracket with the Hamiltonian: by [F1] and [F2], and , so the Hamilton equations , read , ; this is claim 2.
Evolution and oscillator: [F3] gives claim 3 directly; for the oscillator instance [F4] gives and skew-symmetry of [F2] gives , so by [F3] is constant along every solution, which is claim 4.
Collecting steps 1.1, 1.2 and 2.1 proves the four claims on the declared data.
The isotropic oscillator of the model: explicit solution, the determinant and matrix tests on each two-dimensional block, and the area and energy checks
A worked verification of the symplectic and volume-preserving character of the model's Hamiltonian flow on the isotropic oscillator instance: the explicit solution of the one-label model with potential , the block matrix identity and unit determinant of its time- map, the area and six-volume checks on explicit boxes, and the constancy of the oscillator energy. All quantities are model values of the declared idealization; no measurement is reported.
Example
Declare the one-label model of the force branch Adopted force model: force maps, the equation of motion, additive composition of force contributions and frame covariance with , mass , time window , configuration domain , the time-independent potential with and no residual forces (Configuration domain of labeled particles: open admissible sets, regular holonomic constraints and the mass operator, Potential presentations of a force model, potential and mechanical energy, closed versus exact force fields, local potentials and equipotential level sets, The action functional of a force model with a potential presentation: the mechanical Lagrangian, its chart instance and its dimensions); this is the isotropic oscillator instance. By Every potential presentation is hyperregular in its charts, with inverse branch (or ) and the explicit kinetic-plus-potential Hamiltonian the branch Hamiltonian is
The stiffness and angular frequency have dimensions and . The grouped phase coordinates are , with and ; hence the six-dimensional phase-volume unit is , action cubed.
on the Cartesian phase domain , with the two-form (The canonical one-form and the two-form of a potential presentation: on the Cartesian momentum phase chart and the induced forms on each generalized-coordinate chart, The two-form of a potential presentation is closed and nondegenerate, and each generalized-coordinate momentum chart carries the same symplectic structure: and ) and the Hamiltonian field (The Hamiltonian field of a phase function for a potential presentation: the unique field with , and for the branch Hamiltonian, Cartesian model motions on the potential branch and declared generalized-coordinate Lagrange equations integrate their Hamiltonian fields; the forced Cartesian field is Hamiltonian exactly when the residual force has a velocity-independent potential). Then:
- for every initial datum the curve
solves the Hamiltonian system for all ; 2. in the grouped order its derivative is and for direct block multiplication gives because . If is the permutation to interleaved order, then and , where ; each block satisfies and . Therefore , so the time- map is canonical (The Hamiltonian evolution of a potential presentation preserves the two-form, the bracket and the determinant on its actual time-slice domains, also when the Hamiltonian depends on time, A map between phase domains preserves the standard two-form iff , and a canonical diffeomorphism carries to ); 3. explicit volume check in the numeric coordinates measured in the declared SI units: the image of the unit square under is the parallelogram with area , and the image of the box has numeric six-volume , corresponding to physical phase-volume dimension action cubed; 4. the energy is constant along the flow, , and (Evolution of phase functions along the model's Hamiltonian solutions: , the first-integral criterion, and the closed bracket algebra of autonomous first integrals clause 2).
All quantities are model values of the declared idealization; no measurement is reported.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The one-label isotropic oscillator instance with its Hamiltonian, field, two-form and bracket, and the displayed curve .
Model and Hamiltonian (Every potential presentation is hyperregular in its charts, with inverse branch (or ) and the explicit kinetic-plus-potential Hamiltonian, The Hamiltonian of a hyperregular potential presentation: the Legendre transform of the mechanical Lagrangian, its domain and its dimensions, Potential presentations of a force model, potential and mechanical energy, closed versus exact force fields, local potentials and equipotential level sets, Adopted force model: force maps, the equation of motion, additive composition of force contributions and frame covariance, Configuration domain of labeled particles: open admissible sets, regular holonomic constraints and the mass operator, Dimensions and SI unit conventions of the non-relativistic classical mechanics framework): with , , and ; , , and ; the oscillator equation is .
Field, forms and canonicity (The canonical one-form and the two-form of a potential presentation: on the Cartesian momentum phase chart and the induced forms on each generalized-coordinate chart, The two-form of a potential presentation is closed and nondegenerate, and each generalized-coordinate momentum chart carries the same symplectic structure: and , The Hamiltonian field of a phase function for a potential presentation: the unique field with , and for the branch Hamiltonian, Cartesian model motions on the potential branch and declared generalized-coordinate Lagrange equations integrate their Hamiltonian fields; the forced Cartesian field is Hamiltonian exactly when the residual force has a velocity-independent potential, The Hamiltonian evolution of a potential presentation preserves the two-form, the bracket and the determinant on its actual time-slice domains, also when the Hamiltonian depends on time, A map between phase domains preserves the standard two-form iff , and a canonical diffeomorphism carries to ): the Hamiltonian system is , ; the two-form is with standard matrix , and a map with is canonical with .
Sine and cosine calculus (The derivatives of sine and cosine are cosine and minus sine, The addition formulas for sine and cosine, Sine and cosine defined by their real power series, The Jacobian matrix of partial derivatives and the gradient in the scalar-valued case, Directional derivatives and partial derivatives of a map , Rectangular matrix multiplication and the identity matrix , including zero-sized shapes, Linear map between vector spaces over the same field, For , the determinant over a commutative ring by the Leibniz formula, and for a real matrix, The Euclidean inner product on , Euclidean maps and diffeomorphisms): the derivatives of sine and cosine are known, , and the displayed derivatives, products and determinants are computed by the ordinary rules.
Evolution identity (Evolution of phase functions along the model's Hamiltonian solutions: , the first-integral criterion, and the closed bracket algebra of autonomous first integrals, The Poisson bracket of phase functions of a potential presentation: and the coordinate formula in each canonical chart): along any solution of the Hamiltonian system, for autonomous functions, and autonomous functions whose bracket with vanishes identically are constant along solutions.
Verification
The curve solves the system: differentiating the displayed formula with the derivatives of [F3] gives and because ; by [F2] this is exactly the Hamiltonian system, which proves claim 1.
Grouped-order canonical identity: with and , the derivative is and . Block multiplication gives . Under the declared permutation from grouped to interleaved order, , so . Thus the full six-dimensional derivative is canonical in the grouped coordinates and has unit determinant, proving claim 2.
Volume checks and energy: on each coordinate pair the linear action is , so the unit square maps to the parallelogram spanned by its columns and has numeric area . The permutation in claim 2 identifies the grouped map with the product of these three pair maps; permutation does not change determinant, so the numeric six-volume of the unit box is , which is one unit of action cubed under the declared SI coordinate scales (claim 3). For the energy, [F4] and give constancy of along the curve, and the direct computation , gives after substituting , the mixed terms cancelling; this proves claim 4.
Collecting steps 1.1, 1.2 and 2.1 proves the four claims on the declared data.
The free particle of the model: the flow generated by the first-kind function , the projection check and the exact change of
A worked generating-function computation for the declared one-label free-particle presentation: the explicit free Hamiltonian flow, its first-kind generating function with the mixed-Hessian determinant, the invertibility of the -projection for , the degeneration of the generating data at , and the exact change of the canonical one-form along the flow. All quantities are model values of the declared idealization; no measurement is reported.
Example
Declare the one-label model of the force branch Adopted force model: force maps, the equation of motion, additive composition of force contributions and frame covariance with , mass , time window , configuration domain , zero potential and no residual forces (the free particle instance, Configuration domain of labeled particles: open admissible sets, regular holonomic constraints and the mass operator, Potential presentations of a force model, potential and mechanical energy, closed versus exact force fields, local potentials and equipotential level sets, The action functional of a force model with a potential presentation: the mechanical Lagrangian, its chart instance and its dimensions). By Every potential presentation is hyperregular in its charts, with inverse branch (or ) and the explicit kinetic-plus-potential Hamiltonian the branch Hamiltonian is with Hamiltonian system , (The Hamiltonian of a hyperregular potential presentation: the Legendre transform of the mechanical Lagrangian, its domain and its dimensions, Cartesian model motions on the potential branch and declared generalized-coordinate Lagrange equations integrate their Hamiltonian fields; the forced Cartesian field is Hamiltonian exactly when the residual force has a velocity-independent potential). Then:
- for every initial datum the maximal solution is
the free-particle flow of the presentation; 2. for the function is of class on with (action), invertible everywhere, and the first-kind map it generates is exactly : indeed gives , and ; consequently is a canonical map of the presentation with (Generating functions for a potential presentation: first- and second-kind data generate canonical maps locally, the local converse under an invertible projection, and the time-dependent Hamiltonian clauses 1, Generating functions of the first and second kind for a local canonical map, The local map generated by a first- or second-kind generating function is a canonical local diffeomorphism); 3. projection check: the map has invertible derivative for , while the family degenerates at : has no value there and the projection becomes singular, so this family does not represent the identity map; 4. the canonical one-form changes by an exact form along the flow: with , because ; in particular , recovering canonicity directly (The canonical one-form and the two-form of a potential presentation: on the Cartesian momentum phase chart and the induced forms on each generalized-coordinate chart, A map between phase domains preserves the standard two-form iff , and a canonical diffeomorphism carries to ).
All quantities are model values of the declared idealization; no measurement is reported.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The one-label free-particle instance with its Hamiltonian, flow and two-form, the generating datum , and the canonical one-form of the presentation.
Model and Hamiltonian (Every potential presentation is hyperregular in its charts, with inverse branch (or ) and the explicit kinetic-plus-potential Hamiltonian, The Hamiltonian of a hyperregular potential presentation: the Legendre transform of the mechanical Lagrangian, its domain and its dimensions, Potential presentations of a force model, potential and mechanical energy, closed versus exact force fields, local potentials and equipotential level sets, Adopted force model: force maps, the equation of motion, additive composition of force contributions and frame covariance, Configuration domain of labeled particles: open admissible sets, regular holonomic constraints and the mass operator, Dimensions and SI unit conventions of the non-relativistic classical mechanics framework, The associated first-order system, motions, maximal motions and the Newtonian flow of a force model): on with Hamilton system , , whose solutions are , .
Generating functions (Generating functions for a potential presentation: first- and second-kind data generate canonical maps locally, the local converse under an invertible projection, and the time-dependent Hamiltonian , Generating functions of the first and second kind for a local canonical map, The local map generated by a first- or second-kind generating function is a canonical local diffeomorphism): for first-kind data with the map defined by , is a canonical local diffeomorphism with unit determinant, and .
Forms and calculus (The canonical one-form and the two-form of a potential presentation: on the Cartesian momentum phase chart and the induced forms on each generalized-coordinate chart, The two-form of a potential presentation is closed and nondegenerate, and each generalized-coordinate momentum chart carries the same symplectic structure: and , Canonical maps of a potential presentation: pullback-preserving immersions and the equal-dimensional determinant and field-transport tests, A map between phase domains preserves the standard two-form iff , and a canonical diffeomorphism carries to , The pullback of a differential form, A smooth differential -form, The chain rule for total derivatives: , Euclidean maps and diffeomorphisms, The Jacobian matrix of partial derivatives and the gradient in the scalar-valued case, Directional derivatives and partial derivatives of a map , The total (Fréchet) derivative as the linear first-order approximation with remainder, Rectangular matrix multiplication and the identity matrix , including zero-sized shapes, The transpose of a matrix, Linear map between vector spaces over the same field, Invertible matrices and the general linear group , A positive-sized square matrix over a commutative ring is invertible if and only if its determinant is a unit, For , the determinant over a commutative ring by the Leibniz formula, and for a real matrix, The Euclidean inner product on ): the canonical one-form of the presentation is and pulls back as displayed, the canonical two-form is in canonical coordinates, and the algebraic and differential computations of the example use the ordinary product, chain and mixed-partial rules; a block matrix with invertible diagonal blocks is invertible.
Verification
The displayed curve has and , hence solves the Hamiltonian system for all , so by the solutions clause of [F1] it is the free-particle flow; this is claim 1.
Mixed Hessian and generated map: , so is invertible for ; the first-kind relations of [F2] read and , hence and : the generated map is ; by [F2] it is canonical with unit determinant, which is claim 2.
Projection and degeneration: the derivative of is the displayed block matrix with invertible diagonal blocks and for , so the projection is invertible there; at the function is undefined and the lower-right block vanishes, so the projection is singular, and no member of the family represents the identity map; this is claim 3.
Pullback of the one-form: with and , so by the chain rule and the symmetry of the Euclidean product [F3]; differentiating gives , and the matrix identity of claim 2 was already computed; this is claim 4.
Collecting steps 1.1, 1.2, 2.1 and 2.2 proves the four claims on the declared data.
The point transformation of the model: the chart transition is generated in the second kind, has a nowhere invertible -projection, and is contrasted with the momentum shift
A worked projection and generating-function computation for the declared potential presentation: a genuine chart of the configuration domain induces the momentum chart transition from generalized momentum to Cartesian momentum , , generated in the second kind by the action-dimensioned function ; the transition has unit determinant and fails the first-kind projection hypothesis identically. The degenerate case is compared with the momentum shift, whose second-kind generating function is global. All quantities are model values of the declared idealization; no measurement is reported.
Example
Declare the one-label model of the force branch Adopted force model: force maps, the equation of motion, additive composition of force contributions and frame covariance with , mass , configuration domain , a potential and no residual forces, and let be a generalized-coordinate chart of the configuration domain: , of class , invertible for every (Generalized-coordinate maps of the model, the substituted Lagrangian, the kinetic metric and generalized forces, Configuration domain of labeled particles: open admissible sets, regular holonomic constraints and the mass operator, Potential presentations of a force model, potential and mechanical energy, closed versus exact force fields, local potentials and equipotential level sets, The action functional of a force model with a potential presentation: the mechanical Lagrangian, its chart instance and its dimensions). Let the generalized coordinates have declared dimensions ; their conjugate generalized momenta have dimensions . The Cartesian positions have dimension and their conjugate Cartesian momenta have dimension , by Dimensions and SI unit conventions of the non-relativistic classical mechanics framework and Generalized-coordinate maps of the model, the substituted Lagrangian, the kinetic metric and generalized forces. The induced momentum chart transition of the presentation is
the second equality because when is invertible and (The canonical one-form and the two-form of a potential presentation: on the Cartesian momentum phase chart and the induced forms on each generalized-coordinate chart, The momentum of a potential presentation: the fibre derivative of the mechanical Lagrangian, the Cartesian momentum Mv and generalized momenta, Hyperregular potential presentations and their inverse Legendre branches in the model's charts). Then:
- the function on is of class and has action dimension ; its mixed derivative matrix is , whose determinant is nonzero. Here is the new Cartesian momentum, while is the old generalized momentum. The second-kind relations are and , so solving for gives , exactly ; consequently is a canonical map of the presentation with (Generating functions of the first and second kind for a local canonical map, The local map generated by a first- or second-kind generating function is a canonical local diffeomorphism);
- determinant check: with the block decomposition in source coordinates and target coordinates the derivative is block triangular,
- the -projection is independent of the momentum and has derivative of rank at every point: it is nowhere invertible. Since a first-kind generating function requires the relation to be solvable for , i.e. the map to be a local diffeomorphism, the transition admits no first-kind generating function near any point; the second-kind representation of claim 1 is the available local description (Generating functions of the first and second kind for a local canonical map, A canonical map with invertible -projection is locally generated by a first-kind generating function);
- contrast — the Cartesian momentum shift: for a constant of momentum dimension the map of the Cartesian chart is canonical trivially (), its first-kind projection is degenerate identically, and it has the global second-kind generating function , also of action dimension, since and (Generating functions for a potential presentation: first- and second-kind data generate canonical maps locally, the local converse under an invertible projection, and the time-dependent Hamiltonian clause 2).
All quantities are model values of the declared idealization; no measurement is reported.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The one-label model with a genuine chart of the configuration domain, the induced momentum chart transition , and the generating-function data of the two examples.
Chart data and units (Generalized-coordinate maps of the model, the substituted Lagrangian, the kinetic metric and generalized forces, The momentum of a potential presentation: the fibre derivative of the mechanical Lagrangian, the Cartesian momentum Mv and generalized momenta, Hyperregular potential presentations and their inverse Legendre branches in the model's charts, Every potential presentation is hyperregular in its charts, with inverse branch (or ) and the explicit kinetic-plus-potential Hamiltonian, The canonical one-form and the two-form of a potential presentation: on the Cartesian momentum phase chart and the induced forms on each generalized-coordinate chart, The two-form of a potential presentation is closed and nondegenerate, and each generalized-coordinate momentum chart carries the same symplectic structure: and , Configuration domain of labeled particles: open admissible sets, regular holonomic constraints and the mass operator, Dimensions and SI unit conventions of the non-relativistic classical mechanics framework): is a immersion with invertible, , the generalized momentum is with , and the transition is , whose output is Cartesian momentum of dimension .
Generating functions and their canonical maps (Generating functions of the first and second kind for a local canonical map, The local map generated by a first- or second-kind generating function is a canonical local diffeomorphism, A canonical map with invertible -projection is locally generated by a first-kind generating function, The Euclidean inverse function theorem): a second-kind datum with generates a canonical local diffeomorphism via old generalized momentum and new Cartesian position , with unit determinant; a first-kind datum requires , so is a local diffeomorphism. The generating functions have action dimension. For the point transformation the mathematical proposition applies with and , using the standard source and target forms supplied by [F1]; the Cartesian-domain theorem Generating functions for a potential presentation: first- and second-kind data generate canonical maps locally, the local converse under an invertible projection, and the time-dependent Hamiltonian clause 2 applies to the momentum shift with .
Calculus and matrix algebra ( Euclidean maps and diffeomorphisms, The Jacobian matrix of partial derivatives and the gradient in the scalar-valued case, Directional derivatives and partial derivatives of a map , Rectangular matrix multiplication and the identity matrix , including zero-sized shapes, The transpose of a matrix, Linear map between vector spaces over the same field, Invertible matrices and the general linear group , A positive-sized square matrix over a commutative ring is invertible if and only if its determinant is a unit, For , the determinant over a commutative ring by the Leibniz formula, and for a real matrix, Submersions and immersions between Euclidean open sets): has generalized-momentum components , so has action dimension; the displayed partial derivatives are computed by the ordinary rules, transposes and inverses obey , and a matrix with a vanishing block column has rank at most the number of its nonzero columns.
Verification
Second-kind generation: by [F3], and , so has nonzero determinant by [F1]. The generated relations of [F2] are and , i.e. and : this is , canonical with unit determinant and with ; claim 1.
Momentum shift: for the derivative is the identity, so and the map is canonical; with one has and , so [F2] gives , , i.e. , with ; the first-kind projection is constant in and hence degenerate; this is claim 4.
Determinant check: in the coordinates on the source and on the target, the derivative of is the displayed block-triangular matrix with diagonal blocks and ; because and , its determinant is , which is claim 2.
Projection obstruction: the -projection of sends to , with derivative the displayed block matrix whose second block column vanishes; its rank is at most , so it is nowhere invertible. By [F2], a first-kind generating function would make a local diffeomorphism whose inverse is exactly this projection, which is impossible; hence no first-kind generating function exists near any point, proving claim 3.
Collecting steps 1.1, 2.1, 2.2 and 1.2 proves the four claims on the declared data.
Determinant tests on explicit linear maps: is equivalent to canonicity in dimension two, and strictly weaker in dimension four (the volume-preserving shear)
Example
Let and, in the ordered coordinates of , let be the standard symplectic matrix of the phase domain (A phase domain, its canonical one-form and its standard symplectic two-form); recall that a linear map is canonical exactly when (A map between phase domains preserves the standard two-form iff , and a canonical diffeomorphism carries to ). Then:
- (dimension two) For one has
so an invertible is canonical if and only if : in one degree of freedom canonicity and oriented area preservation coincide. For instance has and is canonical. 2. (scaling) For the block-diagonal map on the phase domain is canonical: its derivative satisfies and ; it even preserves the canonical one-form, , because . 3. (volume preservation is weaker in dimension four) The linear shear
is written in grouped coordinates , whose symplectic matrix is . It has , so it preserves volume, but : the -entry is instead of . Equivalently the fundamental bracket does not vanish, while canonicity would force . Hence does not imply canonicity in dimension . 4. (positive control) If in the ordered coordinates with each block satisfying , then : canonicity is preserved blockwise.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The standard symplectic matrices and , the displayed linear maps, and the coordinate functions of the phase domains.
Symplectic matrix and canonical tests (A phase domain, its canonical one-form and its standard symplectic two-form, The standard two-form of a phase domain is closed and nondegenerate, with contraction , A map between phase domains preserves the standard two-form iff , and a canonical diffeomorphism carries to ): , ; a map between phase domains is canonical exactly when ; canonicity is equivalent to the preservation of the standard two-form.
Brackets (The Hamiltonian field of a function on a phase domain is , and the Poisson bracket is , A phase domain, its canonical one-form and its standard symplectic two-form): the coordinate functions of a phase domain satisfy ; in particular , .
Matrix algebra (For , the determinant over a commutative ring by the Leibniz formula, and for a real matrix, For same-sized finite square matrices over a commutative ring, , For every square matrix over a commutative ring, , Rectangular matrix multiplication and the identity matrix , including zero-sized shapes, The transpose of a matrix, Linear map between vector spaces over the same field, Euclidean maps and diffeomorphisms): matrix products, transposes and determinants are computed entrywise by the ordinary rules, , and a linear map has constant derivative equal to its matrix.
Verification
Dimension two: multiplying by [F3] gives ; for invertible this equals exactly when by [F1], and has determinant , which is claim 1.
Scaling: computed by [F3], and has the off-diagonal blocks and , so it equals ; the determinant is , and ; this is claim 2.
Shear: the derivative of computed by [F3] is (in grouped coordinates), with because it is triangular with unit diagonal; expanding gives , whose -entry is , so the matrix identity fails; equivalently, by [F2], , and canonicity would force the vanishing of this bracket; this is claim 3.
Block positive control: in the ordered coordinates , so whenever each block satisfies its two-dimensional identity; this is claim 4.
Necessity of determinant in dimension four: put and define . Bilinearity and skew-symmetry make multilinear and alternating (interchanging any adjacent pair negates the displayed expression), and . Expanding each argument in the coordinate basis therefore gives by the permutation definition of the determinant. If , each pairing in is preserved, so that value is . Thus every canonical has , while step 1.3 gives a noncanonical map with determinant . The grouped-coordinate version has the same determinant by conjugation with the coordinate permutation.
Collecting steps 1.1-1.4 and 2.1 proves the four claims; in particular the determinant test is equivalent to canonicity in dimension two and strictly weaker in dimension four.
The velocity-Verlet step of the model's mechanical splitting is a canonical map of the presentation: exact flows of the drift and kick, unit determinant, and the oscillator check
A worked verification that the velocity-Verlet step of the declared one-label potential presentation is a canonical map: the drift and kick are the exact time- flows of the kinetic and potential parts of the branch Hamiltonian, the composite satisfies the matrix identity in exact arithmetic, and the isotropic-oscillator instance is checked explicitly with unit determinant. All quantities are model values of the declared idealization in exact arithmetic; no measurement or roundoff claim is made.
Example
Declare the one-label model of the force branch Adopted force model: force maps, the equation of motion, additive composition of force contributions and frame covariance with , mass , time window , configuration domain , a time-independent potential and no residual forces (Configuration domain of labeled particles: open admissible sets, regular holonomic constraints and the mass operator, Potential presentations of a force model, potential and mechanical energy, closed versus exact force fields, local potentials and equipotential level sets, The action functional of a force model with a potential presentation: the mechanical Lagrangian, its chart instance and its dimensions); by Every potential presentation is hyperregular in its charts, with inverse branch (or ) and the explicit kinetic-plus-potential Hamiltonian the branch Hamiltonian is (The Hamiltonian of a hyperregular potential presentation: the Legendre transform of the mechanical Lagrangian, its domain and its dimensions). Consider the mechanical splitting with and , the drift and kick maps
and the velocity-Verlet map , defined wherever the composition exists (The splitting Hamiltonian , the drift and kick maps, and the velocity-Verlet map with the mass matrix and ). In this physical presentation is a time increment with .
For the numerical-error assertion in claim 4, choose reference scales , , and use dimensionless coordinates , , , canonical for the normalized form , and the normalized Hamiltonian , and . The product has action dimension, so is dimensionless. All error norms and derivative bounds in that claim are those of the dimensionless phase vector with its ordinary Euclidean norm. In these coordinates , where is positive and is . For a physical horizon , write . Write and for the exact flow and Verlet map of in these normalized variables. Then:
- is the exact time- flow of the Hamiltonian field of , whose components are ; and is the exact time- flow of the field of , , because along the horizontal trajectory is constant and the momentum moves at the constant rate ;
- consequently is a canonical map of the presentation in exact arithmetic: and wherever is defined and (The drift, kick and velocity-Verlet maps are canonical: and , Canonical maps of a potential presentation: pullback-preserving immersions and the equal-dimensional determinant and field-transport tests, A map between phase domains preserves the standard two-form iff , and a canonical diffeomorphism carries to ); the separate drift and kick maps are canonical as well, and claim 1 identifies them as exact time- flows of their respective split-component fields;
- explicit check on the isotropic oscillator instance with and stiffness dimension : on each coordinate pair,
and ; in dimension two, is equivalent to canonicity (Determinant tests on explicit linear maps: is equivalent to canonicity in dimension two, and strictly weaker in dimension four (the volume-preserving shear)). In grouped coordinates the full derivative has the corresponding scalar blocks; under the permutation to interleaved order it is and the canonical matrix is . Thus the full matrix identity and determinant-one claim hold on the six-dimensional instance; 4. accuracy and scope. Assume that in the normalized coordinates there are an open bounded convex tube in the phase domain, a nonempty compact set and with , and finite bounds , and . The local-error lemma then supplies constants and . For , , and with , suppose both exact points and numerical points remain in for every . Then the suppliers give for , and when , or when (The velocity-Verlet step matches the exact flow through order two: local truncation error on a convex tube, Finite-time global error of the velocity-Verlet method: ). The constants depend on the declared normalized tube bounds; the retention and small-step hypotheses are assumptions. Roundoff, all-time energy claims and the holomorphic-domain hypotheses of the analytic estimates are outside this example and are governed by Scope of the certified velocity-Verlet estimates: exact arithmetic, compact tubes, roundoff, and absent all-time claims.
All statements are about exact arithmetic on the declared idealization; no measurement or floating-point claim is made.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The one-label model with its branch Hamiltonian and its mechanical splitting, the drift and kick maps, and the velocity-Verlet composite.
Model and Hamiltonian (Every potential presentation is hyperregular in its charts, with inverse branch (or ) and the explicit kinetic-plus-potential Hamiltonian, The Hamiltonian of a hyperregular potential presentation: the Legendre transform of the mechanical Lagrangian, its domain and its dimensions, Potential presentations of a force model, potential and mechanical energy, closed versus exact force fields, local potentials and equipotential level sets, Adopted force model: force maps, the equation of motion, additive composition of force contributions and frame covariance, Configuration domain of labeled particles: open admissible sets, regular holonomic constraints and the mass operator, Dimensions and SI unit conventions of the non-relativistic classical mechanics framework): with , , and the force is .
Splitting and its canonical maps (The splitting Hamiltonian , the drift and kick maps, and the velocity-Verlet map, The drift, kick and velocity-Verlet maps are canonical: and , Canonical maps of a potential presentation: pullback-preserving immersions and the equal-dimensional determinant and field-transport tests, A map between phase domains preserves the standard two-form iff , and a canonical diffeomorphism carries to ): with , , , , as in the cited definition, , and on the sets where the maps are defined; when their full segments stay in the phase domain, and are the time- maps of the local flows of the fields of and .
Oscillator checks (Determinant tests on explicit linear maps: is equivalent to canonicity in dimension two, and strictly weaker in dimension four (the volume-preserving shear), Rectangular matrix multiplication and the identity matrix , including zero-sized shapes, The transpose of a matrix, For every square matrix over a commutative ring, , For , the determinant over a commutative ring by the Leibniz formula, and for a real matrix, Linear map between vector spaces over the same field, The Jacobian matrix of partial derivatives and the gradient in the scalar-valued case, Directional derivatives and partial derivatives of a map , Euclidean maps and diffeomorphisms, The Euclidean inner product on ): in dimension two a matrix with satisfies ; gradients of are ; matrix products, transposes and determinants are computed by the ordinary rules.
Error estimates (The velocity-Verlet step matches the exact flow through order two: local truncation error on a convex tube, Finite-time global error of the velocity-Verlet method: ): after the displayed dimensionless normalization, the local supplier assumes an open bounded convex tube, a compact set with positive tube margin, a potential and finite bounds on and its first two derivatives; it gives and the one-step defect. The finite-time supplier additionally assumes , , and that both exact and numerical points stay in the compact set at every step; with , it gives the bound stated in claim 4, including the case. Both results are exact-arithmetic mathematical estimates, not error observations.
Verification
On the Cartesian chart the fields are and ; the curve solves , , so it is the time- map of , and the curve solves , , so it is the time- map of ; this is claim 1.
Oscillator composite: for , ; applying , then , then to one coordinate pair gives the displayed update and derivative block . Its determinant expands to , so the two-dimensional determinant test gives . In grouped order the full derivative is , where , , and . The permutation to interleaved order conjugates to and the grouped canonical matrix to ; hence and . This is claim 3.
Accuracy and scope: the instantiated step is the velocity-Verlet map of the splitting data, so [F4] applies and gives the cubic local and quadratic finite-time error statements in exact arithmetic, with the recorded scope limitations; this is claim 4.
Canonical character: by [F2] the derivatives of , and their composite satisfy the matrix identity, so each map is canonical and preserves the two-form. Step 1.1 identifies the drift and kick as exact time- flows of their respective split-component fields; this proves claim 2.
Collecting steps 1.1, 1.2, 1.3 and 2.1 proves the four claims on the declared data.
Sources
- D. Tong, Classical Dynamics (Cambridge lecture notes, January 2015 printing), Section 4.3, printed pages 94-95 (PDF pages 100-101): the fundamental brackets and the evolution formula $df/dt=\{f,H\}+\partial f/\partial t$; Section 4.5.1, printed pages 105-107 (PDF pages 111-113): the one-dimensional harmonic oscillator Hamiltonian and equations. The three-axis bracket computations below are local specializations
- G. J. Sussman and J. Wisdom, Structure and Interpretation of Classical Mechanics, second edition (MIT Press, 2014/2015), Sections 5.2.2-5.3: the fundamental Poisson brackets of the coordinates and momenta and their role in the canonical condition
- D. Tong, Classical Dynamics (Cambridge lecture notes, January 2015 printing), Sections 4.2, 4.4.1 and 4.5.1, printed pages 88-90, 102-103 and 105-107 (PDF pages 94-96, 108-109 and 111-113): the harmonic oscillator in phase space, the area-preserving rotation of its flow and the determinant computation for the Hamiltonian map
- G. J. Sussman and J. Wisdom, Structure and Interpretation of Classical Mechanics, second edition (MIT Press, 2014/2015), Sections 5.2-5.3: the symplectic derivative of the oscillator flow and the preservation of the phase-space area
- D. Tong, Classical Dynamics (Cambridge lecture notes, January 2015 printing), Sections 4.4.3 and 4.7, printed pages 104-105 and 121-124 (PDF pages 110-111 and 127-130): generating functions and the free-particle action/complete integral used to generate the free flow
- G. J. Sussman and J. Wisdom, Structure and Interpretation of Classical Mechanics, second edition (MIT Press, 2014/2015), Sections 5.4-5.4.1: $F_1$-type generating functions of the free particle and the solution $Q=q+(t/m)p$
- D. Tong, Classical Dynamics (Cambridge lecture notes, January 2015 printing), Sections 4.4 and 4.4.3, printed pages 100-105 (PDF pages 106-111): the extension of a configuration-coordinate change to a canonical phase-space map, $P_i=(\Theta^{-1})^{j}{}_{i}\,p_j$, and the generating functions of the various kinds
- G. J. Sussman and J. Wisdom, Structure and Interpretation of Classical Mechanics, second edition (MIT Press, 2014/2015), Sections 5.1 and 5.4.1: point transformations as canonical transformations extending configuration-coordinate changes, and the projection conditions for generating functions
- D. Tong, Classical Dynamics (Cambridge lecture notes, January 2015 printing), Section 4.4, printed pages 100-101 (PDF pages 106-107): the symplectic-matrix condition $\mathcal J J\mathcal J^{\mathsf T}=J$ for a change of variables to be canonical
- G. J. Sussman and J. Wisdom, Structure and Interpretation of Classical Mechanics, second edition (MIT Press, 2014/2015), Sections 5.2-5.2.2: the symplectic condition on the derivative and the fundamental Poisson bracket tests
- G. J. Sussman and J. Wisdom, Structure and Interpretation of Classical Mechanics, second edition (MIT Press, 2014/2015), Sections 3.1 and 5.2.2: the symplectic character of the split-step integration of a mechanical Hamiltonian and the canonical condition in matrix form
- K. K. Likharev, Essential Graduate Physics, Part CM: Classical Mechanics (title page last edited September 1, 2026), Section 10.1, chapter pages 2-3 (PDF pages 238-239): the split kinetic/potential structure of the mechanical Hamiltonian whose parts generate the drift and kick maps