Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Interacting Equilibrium Preparations

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

This page develops classical interacting equilibrium preparations from an explicit positional pair-potential model. It fixes the SI reference length and energy conventions, measurable quotient and global Poisson configuration spaces, and exact periodic image-sum energy, along with stability and tail conditions, free, periodic, van Hove, and uniformly tempered exterior boundaries, and the finite-volume canonical, grand-canonical, and positional shell laws. The canonical positional law specializes the measurable-system preparation rule from the preceding finite-statistical page; infinite-energy configurations have zero positive-temperature weight. The positional shell is separately defined and is not a phase-space shell. The page distinguishes adopted preparation rules from conditional thermodynamic deductions and separates the singleton-minimizer hypothesis from phase coexistence. The pressure, canonical/grand duality, interval-energy local limit, exact-particle-number shrinking-shell limit, and boundary claims are stated conditionally on the exact Borel, regularity, density, differentiability, boundary, unit, and uniqueness hypotheses of their mathematical suppliers. The shell theorem concerns positions and pair energy only; it does not establish a full momentum-inclusive energy-shell theorem or dynamical thermalization.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, postulates, theorems and proofs

DefinitionDefinition: AI-adaptedProof: Not applicableverified 2026-10-15 (gpt-6-luna, gpt-6.1-sol, and delegated Codex review/repair agents; see completed run evidence)Open item page →

Stable regularly tempered classical positional preparation

Physical scope

Nonrelativistic classical point-particle models whose thermodynamic claims concern positions and pair interactions; kinetic momentum variables are outside this definition.

Definition

Fix an integer spatial dimension d≥1, a reference length ℓ0>0 measured in metres, and a bounded Lebesgue-measurable region Λ⊂Rd with dimensionless volume V=∣Λ∣<∞. Its physical region is ℓ0Λ. The coordinate x∈Λ is dimensionless and represents physical position ℓ0x. Use the Euclidean norm ∣x∣2=(∑j=1dxj2)1/2 and the maximum norm ∣x∣∞=max⁡1≤j≤d∣xj∣. A finite positional configuration of N classical point particles in Λ is an unordered simple set ω={x1,…,xN}⊂Λ; simple means that no point is repeated. Particle number N is a dimensionless nonnegative integer. When V>0, the physical number density corresponding to the dimensionless density N/V is N/(ℓ0dV), in m−d; no density N/V is assigned when V=0.

A pair potential is an even measurable function φ:Rd→R∪{+∞}, where φ(x) is the interaction energy in joules at physical displacement ℓ0x and evenness means φ(x)=φ(−x). Set E0=1 J and φ^=φ/E0. Whenever φ^ is Borel measurable, it is the dimensionless numerical potential used by Superstable regular pair interactions and configurational ensemble notation. For a labelled representative of ω, define the positional pair energy HN(ω)=∑1≤i<j≤Nφ(xi−xj),H0=H1=0. If any pair is forbidden by the potential, its energy and hence HN are +∞. This model contains no kinetic energy, internal molecular coordinates, quantum exchange terms, or external field.

The interaction is stable if there is a constant B≥0, measured in joules, such that HN(ω)≥−BN for every finite simple configuration. It has a regular integrable tail if there are R>0 and a nonnegative nonincreasing measurable function ψ:[R,∞)→[0,∞), measured in joules, such that ∣φ(x)∣≤ψ(∣x∣2) for ∣x∣2≥R and ∫R∞rd−1ψ(r) dr<∞. A stable potential with this tail condition is the stable regularly tempered class used for the free-cube results on this page. Superstability and a positive divergent core are stronger, separate hypotheses and are not implied by stability.

At temperature T>0 measured in kelvins, use the exact SI Boltzmann constant kB=1.380649×10−23 J K−1 of SI quantities and unit conventions and write β=(kBT)−1 in joules inverse. Thus βHN is dimensionless. Pass the dimensionless numerical inverse temperature β^=E0β=E0/(kBT) and numerical energy H^N=HN/E0 to the mathematical partition definitions of Superstable regular pair interactions and configurational ensemble notation; for finite energies, β^H^N=βHN. For the periodic energy defined below, use the same conversion H^L,per=HL,per/E0. Infinite-energy configurations receive zero positive-temperature weight without evaluating β(+∞). The activity z>0 is dimensionless relative to the reference intensity ℓ0−d. A free-wall finite-volume model contains only positions in Λ and uses HN above.

For periodic boundary conditions, identify a cubic cell of side L in these dimensionless coordinates with the torus Rd/(LZd). For its half-open representative ΛL=[0,L)d and a finite simple configuration ω⊂ΛL, define the periodic continuation ωper={x+Lk:x∈ω, k∈Zd} and HL,per(ω)=12∑x∈ω∑y∈ωpery≠xφ(y−x). Here the inner sum omits only the identical point y=x; it includes images of the same particle in other cells. The factor 1/2 removes double counting of ordered representatives of each periodic pair. For any fixed L>0 and finite ω, the ∣k∣∞=m image shell has Od(md−1) terms and, outside finitely many m, ∣y−x+Lk∣2≥(L/2)m. Monotonicity and the finite weighted tail integral imply ∑mmd−1ψ(Lm/2)<∞, so the far-image tail is absolutely convergent. The remaining near-image set is finite; a term +∞ makes HL,per=+∞, and otherwise the finite near terms plus the absolutely convergent tail define the sum. Translating a centered half-open cell to [0,L)d preserves every displacement and this energy. Free-wall and periodic preparations are distinct boundary conditions. All limits on this page concern positional configurations and do not by themselves include a momentum integral or a full phase-space energy shell.

DefinitionDefinition: AI-adaptedProof: Not applicableverified 2026-10-15 (gpt-6-luna, gpt-6.1-sol, and delegated Codex review/repair agents; see completed run evidence)Open item page →

Van Hove regions and uniformly tempered exterior preparations

Physical scope

Classical positional pair-potential models in dimension d at least two, with free walls, periodic walls, or the explicitly bounded deterministic exterior class defined here.

Definition

Use the dimensionless coordinates, simple configurations, and pair potential of Stable regularly tempered classical positional preparation, with d≥2 as stated in this physical scope. The boundary ∂Λ is the topological boundary in the Euclidean topology of Rd, and dist⁡(x,∂Λ)=inf⁡y∈∂Λ∣x−y∣2. For a bounded measurable region Λ, define its two-sided layer of width s>0 by ∂sΛ={x∈Rd:dist⁡(x,∂Λ)≤s}. A sequence (Λk)k≥1 of bounded measurable regions is van Hove if 0<∣Λk∣<∞, ∣Λk∣→∞, and, for every fixed s>0, ∣∂sΛk∣∣Λk∣⟶0. This is the two-sided Euclidean boundary-layer condition used by the mathematical shape suppliers; it controls points on both sides of ∂Λk. Increasing volume alone does not imply it. A free wall permits particles only in Λk and includes no exterior particles. A periodic wall uses the specified periodic cell and its image convention.

For the deterministic exterior class, let C=[−1/2,1/2)d and Λn=[−n−1/2,n+1/2)d, with dimensionless volume Vn=∣Λn∣. A configuration ζ⊂Rd is locally finite if ∣ζ∩K∣<∞ for every bounded set K⊂Rd. For such ζ, write NC+i(ζ)=∣ζ∩(C+i)∣. The parameter t is dimensionless. Given 0≤t<∞, define Ω(t)={ζ:∑i∈Λn∩ZdNC+i(ζ)2≤tVn for every integer n≥0}. For an interior finite configuration ω⊂Λn and ζ∈Ω(t), its exterior interaction is Wn(ω,ζ)=∑x∈ω∑y∈ζ∖Λnφ(x−y). This sum is well-defined in R∪{+∞}. Indeed, Cauchy--Schwarz and the defining bound for Ω(t) give ∣ζ∩Λm∣≤t Vm=Ot(md). Since ω is finite and bounded, for each fixed x∈ω and all sufficiently large dyadic shells 2k≤∣y∣2<2k+1, one has ∣x−y∣2≥c2k for some c>0. The absolute interaction on that shell is at most a constant times 2kdψ(c2k). These bounds are summable: monotonicity gives ∫c2k−1c2krd−1ψ(r) dr≥Cd2kdψ(c2k) for a constant Cd>0, and the tail integral is finite. Only finitely many near exterior points remain; if one contributes +∞, set Wn=+∞, and otherwise the near sum and absolutely convergent tail define Wn. A positive infinite value has zero Boltzmann weight. The class Ω(t) is a fixed uniform bound on exterior cell counts, not permission for an arbitrary volume-filling external potential. The van Hove and uniformly tempered exterior conditions are separate boundary regimes.

PostulateStatement: AI-adaptedProof: Not applicable‡ sources checked 2026-10-15Open item page →

Indistinguishable-particle positional measure

Physical scope

Classical models of identical point particles of one species represented only by their positions in a fixed finite spatial region; it does not assert quantum statistics or include momentum states.

Postulate

Let Λ⊂Rd be a bounded Lebesgue-measurable region in the dimensionless coordinates of Stable regularly tempered classical positional preparation. Use the completed product-Lebesgue sigma-algebra on ΛN. For N≥1, let DΛ,N={(x1,…,xN)∈ΛN:xi≠xj whenever i≠j},CΛ,N=DΛ,N/SN, where the permutation group SN acts by relabelling coordinates. Give CΛ,N the quotient sigma-algebra: A⊆CΛ,N is measurable exactly when its preimage under the quotient map qN:DΛ,N→CΛ,N is measurable in the trace of the completed product-Lebesgue sigma-algebra. Identify each orbit with its unordered simple configuration. For N=0, set CΛ,0={∅}. If λΛ⊗N is product Lebesgue measure restricted to DΛ,N, define the sector reference measure by μΛ,N=1N!(qN)#λΛ⊗N(N≥1),μΛ,0({∅})=1. Equivalently, for every nonnegative measurable function f on CΛ,N, ∫f(ω) μΛ,N(dω)=1N!∫DΛ,Nf(qN(x1,…,xN)) ddNx. Collision diagonals have product Lebesgue measure zero, so μΛ,N(CΛ,N)=∣Λ∣N/N!; in particular, symmetric integrands may use the equivalent integral over all of ΛN. Thus μΛ,N is a finite measure, not generally a probability. Two labelled tuples represent the same state exactly when they are in one SN orbit. The factor 1/N! is an adopted indistinguishable-particle positional convention, not a theorem about classical trajectories or every classical description.

Let CΛ=⨆N≥0CΛ,N with the disjoint-union sigma-algebra, and regard each μΛ,N as a measure on this union supported on its N-point sector. Define the unit-intensity finite-region Poisson reference by QΛ=e−∣Λ∣∑N=0∞μΛ,N. Its total mass is one because μΛ,N(CΛ,N)=∣Λ∣N/N! and e−∣Λ∣∑N≥0∣Λ∣N/N!=1. This is a positional reference measure in the chosen dimensionless coordinates; it supplies no empirical claim about particle trajectories.

DefinitionDefinition: AI-adaptedProof: Not applicableverified 2026-10-15 (gpt-6-luna, gpt-6.1-sol, and delegated Codex review/repair agents; see completed run evidence)Open item page →

Exact-particle-number positional energy shell

Physical scope

Finite periodic boxes of the classical pair-potential positional model; shells constrain pair configuration energy only and exclude kinetic momentum energy.

Definition

Use Λn=[−n−12,n+12)d, its side length Ln=2n+1 and dimensionless volume Vn=Lnd, the periodic positional energy HLn,per of Stable regularly tempered classical positional preparation, and the exact-N measure μΛn,N of Indistinguishable-particle positional measure. Given Nn∈N0, a reduced configuration-energy center e∈R joules per dimensionless reference volume, and a width δn>0 in the same units, define Sn(Nn,e,δn)={ω⊂Λn:∣ω∣=Nn, ∣HLn,per(ω)/Vn−e∣≤δn}. When 0<μΛn,Nn(Sn)<∞, the uniform positional shell law is Mn(A)=μΛn,Nn(A∩Sn)μΛn,Nn(Sn). A shrinking energy-density shell uses some specified sequence δn↓0. Its total energy width is 2δnVn, which is o(Vn) but need not be microscopic or bounded. Existence of a normalizing shell and the existence of a suitable shrinking sequence are separate theorem obligations. This is not a surface measure on an exact-energy hypersurface and not a phase-space shell for K(p)+HNper.

DefinitionDefinition: AI-adaptedProof: Not applicableverified 2026-10-15 (gpt-6-luna, gpt-6.1-sol, and delegated Codex review/repair agents; see completed run evidence)Open item page →

Retained hard-core continuation at zero inverse temperature

Physical scope

Finite-volume positional models with forbidden pair separations; this is a declared beta-zero hard-admissibility continuation, not a claim about all infinite-temperature physical preparations.

Definition

For the pair potential φ of Stable regularly tempered classical positional preparation, let B={x∈Rd:φ(x)=+∞}. A finite configuration is hard-admissible if every pair displacement avoids B. For z>0, define the retained-admissibility zero-inverse-temperature free-wall weight of ω to be w0(ω)=zN(ω)1{HN(ω)(ω)<∞}. Its finite-volume partition sum, when finite, is ΞΛret,0(z)=∑N≥0∫w0(ω) μΛ,N(dω), using Indistinguishable-particle positional measure. This definition sets the weight of a forbidden configuration to zero; it does not assign a value to the undefined product 0⋅(+∞). When B=∅ the measure is the unrestricted Poisson activity model; for a nonempty hard core it is generally not Poisson. The convention is explicit model data and carries no statement about an arbitrary zero-width energy shell.

For a periodic cell of side L in dimensionless coordinates, use the exact image energy HL,per of Stable regularly tempered classical positional preparation. Its periodic retained-admissibility weight is wL,0per(ω)=zN(ω)1{HL,per(ω)<+∞}=zN(ω)1{φ(y−x)<+∞ for every x∈ω, y∈ωper, y≠x}. Thus every forbidden pair between distinct particles and every forbidden periodic-image pair, including a particle with one of its own nontrivial images, receives zero weight. When finite, the corresponding partition sum is ΞLret,0,per(z)=∑N≥0∫wL,0per dμΛL,N. This is the periodic retained-admissibility convention; it is not an unrestricted zero-beta limit of a shell law.

PostulateStatement: AI-adaptedProof: Not applicable‡ sources checked 2026-10-15Open item page →

Finite-volume equilibrium ensemble sampling

Physical scope

Adopted canonical, grand-canonical, and positional microcanonical preparations of a classical pair-potential model in a stated finite region; no dynamical relaxation, ergodicity, or empirical thermalization is asserted.

Postulate

For a specified finite region and free or periodic boundary preparation, take T>0, β=(kBT)−1 with the SI conventions of Stable regularly tempered classical positional preparation, and the corresponding positional energy. Write HΛ,Nfree=HN for a free region and, for a periodic cube ΛL, write HΛL,Nper=HL,per; in each case N=N(ω). Set CΛ,Nfin={ω∈CΛ,N:HΛ,Nbc(ω)<+∞}. This set is measurable because the pair potential is measurable and the periodic energy is a countable sum of measurable image terms. On it HΛ,Nbc is real-valued. Specialize the measurable-model canonical preparation of Canonical sampling assumption for finite and normalized statistical models to this set with reference measure μΛ,N restricted to it; adopt ZΛ,Nbc=∫CΛ,Nfine−βHΛ,Nbc(ω) μΛ,N(dω),PΛ,Ncan(dω)=1CΛ,Nfin(ω)e−βHΛ,Nbc(ω)ZΛ,Nbc μΛ,N(dω), whenever 0<ZΛ,Nbc<∞. Define the Boltzmann factor to be zero on configurations with energy +∞; thus no value of an exponential at +∞ is needed. Separately adopt the grand-canonical law at activity z>0 to have weights zNe−βHΛ,Nbc on the finite-energy part of each sector and zero elsewhere, relative to the same indistinguishable positional measures. Its normalizer is ΞΛ(z,β)=∑N≥0zNZΛ,Nbc when finite. Here z is dimensionless relative to the reference intensity in Indistinguishable-particle positional measure, and α=log⁡z.

For the controlled positional shell of Exact-particle-number positional energy shell, adopt the conditional measure Mn only when its shell has positive finite reference measure. These are probability-law preparations used to define the model. They are not derived from Hamiltonian trajectories, and they do not assert that a laboratory apparatus reaches any of them. The inverse-temperature-zero hard-core continuation is governed separately by Retained hard-core continuation at zero inverse temperature.

PostulateStatement: AI-adaptedProof: Not applicable‡ sources checked 2026-10-15Open item page →

Selected grand-variational phase uniqueness

Physical scope

Only a named Borel-measurable stable regularly tempered model and parameter point on the positive-temperature branch or explicitly retained hard-core beta-zero branch for which the corresponding translation-invariant variational minimizer is assumed unique; no universal uniqueness or claim at coexistence.

Postulate

Fix the selected stable regularly tempered pair model with Borel-measurable φ^=φ/E0 and activity z>0, with the SI conventions of Stable regularly tempered classical positional preparation. Select exactly one parameter branch: either a finite temperature T>0 in kelvins with β=(kBT)−1>0 in J−1, or the formal retained-hard-admissibility parameter β=0, to which no finite temperature is assigned. In the mathematical numerical-energy convention use β^=E0β; the two branches correspond to β^>0 and β^=0, respectively. For the superstable branch, require measurable even pair potentials φs,φr with φ=φs+φr, where φs is stable in joules and φr(x)≥0 joules for every x. Require constants ϵ>0 joules and r0>0 in dimensionless coordinates such that φr(x)≥ϵ whenever ∥x∥∞≤r0, where ∥x∥∞=max⁡j∣xj∣. After energy conversion, φ^s=φs/E0 is stable and φ^r=φr/E0≥0 with core lower bound ϵ/E0, exactly as in Superstable regular pair interactions and configurational ensemble notation. This is an additional model hypothesis, not a consequence of stability alone.

Under the Axiom of Choice, use the global measurable configuration space Ω of Poisson Configuration Reference, consisting of locally finite simple configurations with sigma-algebra generated by bounded-Borel count maps. For a∈Rd, let Taω(A)=ω(A−a) be its measurable translation. A probability law P on Ω is stationary exactly when P∘Ta−1=P for every a∈Rd. For a bounded Borel region A, equip its finite simple configuration set CA with FAcount=σ(NB:B⊆A Borel), without completing it. On this space rA(ω)=ω∩A is measurable: each generating count satisfies NB∘rA=NB, a bounded-Borel global count. Write PA=P∘rA−1 on this exact count sigma-algebra for every stationary P. This assertion does not extend PA to the completed quotient sigma-algebra. The reference QA=Q∘rA−1 is the restriction of the same unit-intensity law Q; by Poisson Reference Counts and Translation Invariance and the count-generated restriction sigma-algebra, it equals the restriction to FAcount of the finite-sector law e−∣A∣∑N≥0μA,N of Indistinguishable-particle positional measure. This count sigma-algebra is contained in the completed quotient sigma-algebra: in each sector, the pullback of NB is ∑j=1N1B(xj), a Borel function, so each count generator is quotient measurable. Thus the stated restriction of the positional measure is defined. Relative entropy and the restrictions below always use FAcount, exactly as in the mathematical global supplier, rather than an unproved completion for arbitrary P. Indeed, a finite Borel partition of A has multinomial counts under each fixed-N Lebesgue sector, and summing these sector measures with the factor e−∣A∣ gives independent Poisson counts of the corresponding volumes. For each bounded Borel A, write DA(P)=D(PA∥QA) using Relative Entropy of Probability Measures: if PA≪QA and hA=dPA/dQA, then DA(P)=∫hAlog⁡hA dQA with 0log⁡0=0; otherwise DA(P)=+∞. Let C0=[0,1)d and ΛL=[0,L)d. Define ρ(P)=EPNC0 and let Pstat1 be the stationary laws with finite intensity ρ(P)<∞. For P∈Pstat1, define each of the following quantities when its own limit exists and is finite; existence or finiteness of I(P) does not require existence or finiteness of Φ(P):

I(P)=lim⁡L→∞DΛL(P)∣ΛL∣,Φ(P)=lim⁡L→∞EP[HΛLfree]∣ΛL∣.

Here I(P) and ρ(P) are dimensionless per dimensionless reference volume; the physical number density corresponding to ρ(P) is ρ(P)/ℓ0d in m−d. The energy density Φ(P) is in joules per dimensionless reference volume; the corresponding energy density per physical d-volume is Φ(P)/ℓ0d in J m−d. For β>0, use the laws P∈Pstat1 with finite I(P) and Φ(P) and adopt, at the selected (φ,β,z), that arg min⁡P{I(P)+βΦ(P)−ρ(P)log⁡z}={P∗}.

For the β=0 branch, require a nonempty hard-core displacement set B={x:φ(x)=+∞} and use Retained hard-core continuation at zero inverse temperature. A global configuration is hard-admissible when no pair of its distinct points has displacement in B. Restrict to P∈Pstat1 assigning probability one to hard-admissible configurations and having finite I(P); adopt, at the selected z, that arg min⁡P{I(P)−ρ(P)log⁡z}={P∗}. These are two explicit parameter-specific physical model restrictions. They do not assert uniqueness for every activity or temperature, do not apply at coexistence when the minimizer set has several elements, and do not infer uniqueness from thermodynamic smoothness.

Physics theoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedverified 2026-10-15 (gpt-6-luna, gpt-6.1-sol, and delegated Codex review/repair agents; see completed run evidence)Open item page →

Stable-tempered free-cube grand pressure

Physical scope

Positive-temperature grand-canonical positional preparations in cubic free-wall boxes for stable even Borel pair potentials with the explicitly stated decreasing integrable tail.

Statement

Assume AC. Let d≥2, φ be stable with the regular integrable tail of Stable regularly tempered classical positional preparation, and assume its dimensionless representative φ^=φ/E0 is Borel measurable, as required by the current mathematical supplier. Take T>0 and z>0 as in Finite-volume equilibrium ensemble sampling, set E0=1 J, β=(kBT)−1, and β^=E0β>0. For cubes ΛL=[−L/2,L/2)d, let ΞL(z,β) be the free-wall grand partition function specified by Finite-volume equilibrium ensemble sampling. Then the positional grand pressure per physical d-volume pL(z,T)=kBTℓ0d∣ΛL∣log⁡ΞL(z,β) has a finite limit as L→∞. Its units are J m−d; for d=3 this is SI pressure in pascals. In the dimensionless reference-volume convention of Canonical–grand-canonical thermodynamic duality, let P(α,β^)=lim⁡L→∞∣ΛL∣−1log⁡ΞL(eα,β^), where the supplier uses numerical energies in units of E0. Then p=(kBT/ℓ0d)P(log⁡z,β^). This is a conditional model deduction, not a measurement or an assertion that every real gas realizes the preparation.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

Stable regularly tempered classical positional preparation: if B joules is a stability constant for HN, then B^=B/E0 gives H^N=HN/E0≥−B^N for the dimensionless potential. The tail has a nonnegative decreasing envelope ψ in joules with ∫R∞rd−1ψ(r) dr<∞. Set ψ^=ψ/E0; then ∣φ^(x)∣≤ψ^(∣x∣2) and ψ^ has the same finite weighted tail integral. Since ∣x∣2≥∣x∣∞ and ψ^ is nonincreasing, ψ^(∣x∣2)≤ψ^(∣x∣∞), so the mathematical supplier's maximum-norm tail bound holds. That supplier uses numerical energy; H^=H/E0 and β^=E0β preserve βH=β^H^.

[A1]

Finite-volume equilibrium ensemble sampling: the finite-volume grand law uses ΞΛ(z,β)=∑N≥0zNZΛ,N; each ZΛ,N integrates e−βHN only on finite-energy configurations and assigns zero weight elsewhere. In identifying this with the mathematical partition, define its extended-real factor as zero at H^=+∞; on finite energies e−β^H^=e−βH.

[L1]

Canonical–grand-canonical thermodynamic duality: the current carrier's statement defines the dimensionless grand rate from the free-cube activity sum, gives its limit under the stable regular tail hypotheses at positive numerical β^, and states both Legendre--Fenchel identities for the specified closed effective-domain extension. The physical-to-numerical energy conversion is β^=E0β. The item and draft proof text are present, and its scoped batch-18 proof-contract entry passes; current owner Step 1 proof-readiness is recorded and independent review remains pending, so the conclusion remains conditional.

Proof

Given: AC, the stable regularly tempered Borel pair model, the adopted finite-volume positional grand preparation, and the current draft free-cube supplier statement in [L1]. No kinetic partition factor or empirical premise is used.

1.1givenF1A1L1algebra

By [A1], the physical positional partition sum is ΞL(z,β)=∑N≥0zNZΛL,N. Set α=log⁡z; then zN=eαN. Translate the centered cube by L/2 in each coordinate to [0,L)d; this preserves Lebesgue measure and every pair displacement, so the positional partition is exactly the free-cube sum of [L1]. The dimensionless energy conversion in [F1] matches its numerical β^. To verify the all-radius lower-regularity hypothesis of [L1], apply stability to the two-point configuration {0,x}: φ^(x)≥−2B^ for x≠0. Choose a finite C≥max⁡{2B^,ψ^(R),0} also satisfying φ^(0)≥−C; this is possible since that value is real or +∞. Define Ψ(r)=C for 0≤r<R and Ψ(r)=ψ^(r) for r≥R. Then Ψ is nonnegative and nonincreasing, φ^(x)≥−Ψ(∣x∣∞) everywhere, and ∫0∞Ψ(r)rd−1dr=CRd/d+∫R∞ψ^(r)rd−1dr<∞. Together with the maximum-norm upper-tail bound in [F1], this supplies the exact regularity required by [L1].

2.1givenF1L1step 1.1algebra∎

The conditional conclusion of [L1] gives a finite limit P(log⁡z,β^) for ∣ΛL∣−1log⁡ΞL. Multiplying by kBT/ℓ0d, which is independent of L, converts the dimensionless reference-volume rate to pressure per physical volume.

Physics theoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedverified 2026-10-15 (gpt-6-luna, gpt-6.1-sol, and delegated Codex review/repair agents; see completed run evidence)Open item page →

Controlled continuum interval-energy thermodynamic limit

Physical scope

Superstable regular classical positional pair systems in periodic cubes at positive temperature, together with the expressly defined formal retained-hard-admissibility zero-inverse-temperature branch, with a nondegenerate density interval and strict upper-energy threshold; periodically continued local convergence requires the stated unique minimizer.

Statement

Assume AC, the ultrafilter extension principle, DC, and HB, as required by the current variational-pressure supplier. Let E0=1 J, φ^=φ/E0, and assume φ^ is Borel measurable. Require the exact superstable regular hypotheses of Superstable regular pair interactions and configurational ensemble notation for this dimensionless potential: a stable part plus a nonnegative core part bounded below by a positive constant on an ℓ∞-ball, with the supplier's lower and upper regular tail conditions. Use H^=H/E0; then β^H^=βH when β^=E0β.

Use the stationary finite-intensity law space Pstat1 and the supplier's ρ(P) (expected count in a dimensionless unit cube), I(P) (specific relative entropy against the unit-intensity Poisson law), and Φ^(P) (limiting numerical positional energy density) from Superstable regular continuum grand pressure and variational formula. Define ν=sup⁡{ρ(P):P∈Pstat1, I(P)<∞, Φ^(P)<∞},e0(ρ)=inf⁡{Φ^(P):P∈Pstat1, ρ(P)=ρ, I(P)<∞}, with the supremum of an empty set equal to 0 and the infimum of an empty set equal to +∞. Here ρ is particle count per dimensionless reference volume, corresponding to physical number density ρ/ℓ0d in m−d. Let D⊂[0,∞) be an interval of positive length and let e^∈R be a numerical energy per dimensionless reference volume. Require inf⁡D<ν and e^>inf⁡ρ∈De0(ρ), and set e=E0e^ in joules per dimensionless reference volume. The interval-event supplier Interacting density-interval and upper-energy event limit supplies a multiplier pair (β^,z) with β^≥0 and z>0 for this same (D,e^). If β^>0, take β=β^/E0 in J−1 and T=E0/(kBβ^)>0 in kelvins. If β^=0, use only the formal retained-hard-admissibility branch below; it is not a finite-temperature preparation.

For integers n≥0, set Ln=2n+1, Λn=[−Ln/2,Ln/2)d, and Vn=∣Λn∣=Lnd. Define An={ω:NΛn(ω)/Vn∈D, HLn,per(ω)/(E0Vn)≤e^}, where HLn,per is the physical positional energy in joules with the image convention of Stable regularly tempered classical positional preparation. Equivalently, the upper-energy event is HLn,per/Vn≤e. For each n with positive event probability, set Rn(B)=QΛn(B∩An)/QΛn(An) on the finite count sigma-algebra. Equivalently, with Mn=∑N≥0μΛn,N, Rn(B)=Mn(B∩An)/Mn(An), since QΛn=e−VnMn; use the count-sigma restriction of these positional measures. This defines the density-interval/upper-energy conditional preparation.

For the positive-β^ branch, the finite-volume grand and conditional laws use the adopted positional preparation of Finite-volume equilibrium ensemble sampling at the matching T and z. For the β^=0 branch, require a nonempty hard-core displacement set B={x:φ(x)=+∞} and use the formal retained-admissibility continuation of Retained hard-core continuation at zero inverse temperature; do not interpret 0⋅(+∞). Assume the singleton-minimizer postulate Selected grand-variational phase uniqueness holds on its stated finite-intensity stationary-law domain at this exact supplier-selected multiplier pair and branch.

For either branch, Interacting density-interval and upper-energy event limit gives eventual event positivity, the constrained entropy-rate limit, and common-minimizer accumulation points; at β^=0, Zero-inverse-temperature-parameter limit with forbidden pairs retained identifies the matching retained grand law and minimizer set. Under the stated singleton assumption, both the conditioned laws and the corresponding periodic grand laws converge locally to P∗ for every measurable local observable f supported in a bounded region A and satisfying ∣f∣≤c(1+NA). The energy-density center e and widths for this model are in joules per dimensionless reference volume; the corresponding physical d-volume density has units J m−d. This is an interval-density and upper-energy result, not a fixed-particle-number or shrinking-shell theorem.

Here local observables are evaluated on the periodic continuation of the prepared torus configuration. This is the same periodic boundary preparation, with no new physical sampling assumption; a configuration is not extended by the empty configuration outside its fundamental cube.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

Stable regularly tempered classical positional preparation: HN is positional pair energy in joules and the local tail/stability conditions are stated in dimensionless coordinates. On a periodic cube, applying the mathematical supplier's image-energy formula to φ^=φ/E0 divides every term of HL,per by E0; thus the numerical energy used by that supplier is HL,per/E0.

[F2]

Retained hard-core continuation at zero inverse temperature: at β=0 the free-wall weight is zero exactly when its pair energy is forbidden/infinite; in periodic boxes the retained weight also excludes every forbidden periodic-image pair, exactly as in the mathematical supplier. No value is assigned to 0⋅(+∞).

[A1]

Finite-volume equilibrium ensemble sampling: for β>0 finite-energy configurations have weight zNe−βHN relative to the indistinguishable positional measure and infinite-energy configurations have zero weight; the zero-beta case is separately defined by [F2]. In the mathematical comparison, set e−β^H^=0 at H^=+∞; for finite energies β^H^=βH.

[A2]

Selected grand-variational phase uniqueness: for the multiplier pair chosen by the applicable mathematical result, the positive-beta functional or retained-hard-core zero-beta functional has one stationary finite-intensity minimizer P∗; at positive beta its physical and numerical forms agree because β^=E0β and Φ^=Φ/E0.

[L0]

Superstable regular pair interactions and configurational ensemble notation: the current definition requires AC, an even Borel potential, a decomposition φ^=φs+φr with φs stable, φr≥0, and φr(x)≥δ whenever ∥x∥∞≤r0 for some δ,r0>0, plus its specified lower and upper regularity tails. The definition carrier is present as a draft; its proof-contract entry passes with no proof obligation, and current owner Step 1 proof-readiness is recorded; independent review remains pending.

[L1]

Superstable regular continuum grand pressure and variational formula: the current statement assumes AC, the ultrafilter extension principle, DC, and HB; for superstable regular Borel pair potentials it gives the free/periodic Poisson-reference pressure limit as the negative minimum of I+β^Φ−ρlog⁡z over stationary finite-intensity laws, with a nonempty compact minimizer set in τL. Its draft proof text is present, and the scoped batch-18 proof-contract check passes, and current owner Step 1 proof-readiness is recorded; it remains a draft used conditionally pending independent review.

[L2]

Interacting density-interval and upper-energy event limit: the current statement assumes a positive-length density interval D, inf⁡D<ν, and an upper energy threshold above inf⁡ρ∈De0(ρ); for its multipliers β^≥0,z>0 it gives eventual event positivity, the constrained entropy-rate limit, and common conditional/grand minimizer accumulation points, with convergence under uniqueness for periodically continued laws; its empirical-field concentration is established separately in its proof. The draft statement/proof carrier and scoped batch-18 proof-contract entry pass; current owner Step 1 proof-readiness is recorded, and the draft result remains conditional under [L1]’s axioms pending independent review.

[L3]

Zero-inverse-temperature-parameter limit with forbidden pairs retained: the current statement defines the β=0 weight as zN1admissible and gives free/periodic Poisson-reference pressure rates as a minimum over hard-admissible stationary laws, with compact minimizers and local convergence under uniqueness. The draft statement/proof carrier and scoped batch-18 proof-contract entry pass; current owner Step 1 proof-readiness is recorded, with independent review pending. The consumer keeps the declared nonempty-core branch and never interprets 0⋅(+∞).

[L4]

Periodic preparation and local-tame transfer from entropy bounds: periodic translation invariance identifies the continued law with the empirical-field barycenter, and bounded finite-volume entropy density supplies count-tail uniformity and local-tame transfer. This draft mathematical result is used conditionally under its declared choice hypotheses.

Proof

Given: The exact superstable regular Borel branch, the stated set-theoretic assumptions and dimensionless energy conversion, the strict density/energy constraints, the positive-β ensemble postulate or the explicitly defined formal retained-hard-core zero-β law, and the actual draft supplier statements [L1]–[L3]. The multiplier pair and uniqueness condition must match the same branch.

1.1givenF1A1L0L1L2

Translate the centered cube Λn by Ln/2 in each coordinate to [0,Ln)d. This preserves particle number, Lebesgue sector measures, every periodic pair displacement and the image energy; hence the physical event and conditional law match the supplier's cube convention. If β>0, the Borel superstable regular hypotheses are exactly those of [L0], and the physical conditional preparation agrees with the periodic Poisson-reference conditional law in [L2]: the factor e−Vn between QΛn and the unnormalized positional measure is constant on the conditioning event and cancels in normalization. Under the stated strict inequalities, [L2] gives eventual event positivity, its rate limit, and the common-minimizer accumulation statement.

1.2givenF2A1L2L3

If β=0, the same centered-to-[0,Ln)d translation preserves the periodic energy and the positional reference measure. The periodic indicator in [F2] excludes every forbidden pair, including periodic-image pairs, from the finite upper-energy event. Thus the physical event is exactly in the retained-admissibility model rather than an undefined 0⋅(+∞) expression. [L2] gives its event rate and conditional accumulation points; [L3] identifies the corresponding retained grand variational minimizers.

2.1givenA2L2L3L4step 1.1step 1.2∎

In either applicable branch, when the common variational minimizer set furnished by that branch is the singleton P∗ in [A2], every local-tame accumulation point of the periodically continued laws is P∗. Their local-tame relative compactness, including uniformly integrable local counts through [L4], then gives convergence of the conditioned and corresponding grand laws for each stated observable. The conclusion remains conditional on the draft mathematical results and the selected uniqueness premise.

Physics theoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedverified 2026-10-15 (gpt-6-luna, gpt-6.1-sol, and delegated Codex review/repair agents; see completed run evidence)Open item page →

Controlled canonical–grand thermodynamic duality

Physical scope

Stable regularly tempered classical positional Borel pair models at positive temperature in free cubes, for the closed concave extension of the attainable canonical rate; no local-observable equivalence is asserted.

Statement

Assume AC and T>0, with β=(kBT)−1, and take z>0 as in Finite-volume equilibrium ensemble sampling. Under the stable regularly tempered positional model of Stable regularly tempered classical positional preparation and the adopted ensemble weights of Finite-volume equilibrium ensemble sampling, assume the dimensionless potential φ^=φ/E0 is Borel measurable as required by the current mathematical carriers. Set E0=1 J and β^=E0β; write F(ρ,β) and P(α,β) for the mathematical rates evaluated at β^. Use free-wall cubes ΛL=[0,L)d with dimensionless volume VL=Ld. Write ZL(N;β)=∫e−βHN dμΛL,N, extending the integrand by zero at infinite energy, for their canonical positional partitions. Let F(ρ,β) be the canonical log-partition rate per dimensionless reference volume, defined on positive interior attainable densities by VL−1log⁡ZL(NL;β)→F(ρ,β) for every sequence NL/VL→ρ and extended to the closed effective density domain by the upper-semicontinuous concave extension specified in Canonical–grand-canonical thermodynamic duality, with F(ρ,β)=−∞ outside that closed domain. Let P(α,β)=lim⁡L→∞VL−1log⁡∑N≥0eαNZL(N;β),α=log⁡z. Then P(α,β)=sup⁡ρ≥0{F(ρ,β)+αρ}, and, for every ρ in the closed effective density domain of F, F(ρ,β)=inf⁡α∈R{P(α,β)−αρ}. The density ρ is particle count per dimensionless reference volume, corresponding to physical number density ρ/ℓ0d in m−d. In physical units, p=(kBT/ℓ0d)P and the positional Helmholtz free-energy density is fpos=−(kBT/ℓ0d)F; both are per physical d-volume, in J m−d (pascals when d=3). The fixed 1/N! reference normalization is that of Indistinguishable-particle positional measure. This duality concerns limiting thermodynamic functions only. It does not imply local ensemble equivalence, uniqueness of a phase, or convergence at excluded density endpoints.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

Stable regularly tempered classical positional preparation: if B joules is a stability constant for HN, then B^=B/E0 gives H^N=HN/E0≥−B^N for the dimensionless potential; its Euclidean tail is bounded by a decreasing integrable envelope ψ in joules. Set ψ^=ψ/E0; then ∣φ^(x)∣≤ψ^(∣x∣2)≤ψ^(∣x∣∞), so the mathematical suppliers' maximum-norm tail condition holds, with the weighted tail integral still finite. For the lower-regularity condition at all radii, two-particle stability gives φ^(x)≥−2B^ for x≠0. Choose a finite M≥max⁡(2B^,ψ^(R)) also satisfying φ^(0)≥−M, possible because the potential never takes −∞. Extend the maximum-norm envelope by ψ~(r)=M for 0≤r<R and ψ~(r)=ψ^(r) for r≥R. It is nonnegative and nonincreasing with finite weighted integral, bounds −φ^ everywhere, and bounds ∣φ^∣ for ∣x∣∞≥R. Thus both lower and upper regularity hold. Densities are measured per dimensionless reference volume.

[A1]

Finite-volume equilibrium ensemble sampling: at exact N the positional partition integrates the Boltzmann factor on finite-energy configurations and gives infinite-energy configurations zero weight; on the specified free cube the grand partition is ∑NzNZL(N;β) with α=log⁡z. In the mathematical comparison, extend e−β^H^ by zero at H^=+∞; for finite energies β^H^=βH.

[F2]

Indistinguishable-particle positional measure: each canonical sector uses μΛ,N=dx1⋯dxN/N!, fixing the positional reference normalization.

[L1]

Canonical free-cube limit at every interior attainable density: the current statement gives VL−1log⁡Z(L,NL;β^)→F(ρ,β^) for free cubes and every sequence NL/VL→ρ at positive interior attainable density, under its stable regular Borel convention; excluded endpoints are not asserted. The carrier and draft proof text are present and the scoped batch-18 proof-contract check passes, but current owner Step 1 proof-readiness is recorded and independent review remains pending, so this premise remains conditional.

[L2]

Canonical–grand-canonical thermodynamic duality: the current statement defines the free-cube grand pressure rate and states both Legendre--Fenchel identities for the closed effective-domain extension, with pressure existence delegated to its decreasing-integrable-tail supplier. Its item and draft proof text are present and the scoped batch-18 proof-contract check passes, but current owner Step 1 proof-readiness is recorded and independent review remains pending; this result is used conditionally.

Proof

Given: The stable tail, Borel and numerical-energy conventions, finite-volume sector definitions, exact canonical limits [L1], and the actual draft closed-concave duality statement [L2]. The chosen reference length, E0=1 J, and 1/N! convention are fixed across all volumes.

1.1givenF1A1F2L1L2algebra

By [A1] and [F2], the free-wall partition on ΛL=[0,L)d is precisely the activity sum over the canonical positional sectors used in [L2], with α=log⁡z; [F1] and [L1] supply the stable-tail hypotheses and the canonical rate F on its interior. In the mathematical partition, β^=E0β and H^=H/E0, so the Boltzmann factors agree.

2.1givenL1L2step 1.1

The conditional mathematical conclusion [L2] gives both displayed Legendre–Fenchel identities, including only the stipulated closed concave endpoint extension.

3.1givenF2L2step 2.1∎

Multiplication by kBT/ℓ0d converts the dimensionless log-partition rate to physical pressure, while multiplication of the canonical rate by −kBT/ℓ0d gives the stated positional free-energy density; the common measure normalization is fixed by [F2]. Since [L2] is a statement about thermodynamic functions, it supplies no local convergence or phase-uniqueness claim.

Physics theoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedverified 2026-10-15 (gpt-6-luna, gpt-6.1-sol, and delegated Codex review/repair agents; see completed run evidence)Open item page →

Interacting exact-N shrinking-shell three-ensemble local limit

Physical scope

Superstable regular classical positional Borel pair systems in periodic boxes, at positive temperature and interior density, with differentiable canonical rate and a singleton grand variational minimizer; local observables use the same periodic continuation, and kinetic momentum is excluded.

Statement

Assume AC, the ultrafilter extension principle, DC, and HB as required by the current variational-pressure supplier. Take T>0 in kelvins and β=(kBT)−1 in J−1 as in Finite-volume equilibrium ensemble sampling. Let E0=1 J, φ^=φ/E0, and assume φ^ is Borel measurable. Require the exact superstable regular hypotheses of Superstable regular pair interactions and configurational ensemble notation; use H^=H/E0 and β^=E0β>0 in its mathematical suppliers. Let F(ρ,β) denote the dimensionless canonical log-partition rate per dimensionless reference volume evaluated at β^. Assume it is differentiable in physical β at the chosen temperature and set e=−∂βF(ρ,β), in joules per dimensionless reference volume. For periodic cubes Λn, take exact particle numbers Nn with Nn/Vn→ρ at a positive interior attainable density; ρ is particle count per dimensionless reference volume, corresponding to physical number density ρ/ℓ0d in m−d. Choose α∈R such that F(s,β)+αs≤F(ρ,β)+αρ for every s in the closed effective density domain of F, and set z=eα>0. Assume the corresponding stationary finite-intensity grand variational minimizer is the singleton P∗ as in Selected grand-variational phase uniqueness.

Then there exists a constructed sequence δn↓0 for which the periodic exact-Nn canonical positional law, the periodic grand-canonical law at (α,β), and the uniform positional shell law of Exact-particle-number positional energy shell on N=Nn,∣HLn,per/Vn−e∣≤δn,Ln=2n+1 all converge locally to P∗. Convergence means convergence of expectations for every measurable local observable f supported in a bounded region and satisfying ∣f∣≤c(1+NA) there. The shell sequence is constructed from canonical concentration; each δn is in joules per dimensionless reference volume, corresponding to physical energy-density width δn/ℓ0d in J m−d. Arbitrary preassigned shrinking widths, exact zero-width surfaces, full phase-space shells involving kinetic momentum, and a conclusion at nonunique minimizers are not asserted.

Here local observables are evaluated on the periodic continuation of the prepared torus configuration. This is the same periodic boundary preparation, with no new physical sampling assumption; a configuration is not extended by the empty configuration outside its fundamental cube.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

Stable regularly tempered classical positional preparation: HN is positional pair energy in joules; no kinetic term is included. On a periodic cube, applying the mathematical supplier's image-energy formula to φ^=φ/E0 divides every term of HL,per by E0; the numerical energy used by that supplier is therefore HL,per/E0.

[F2]

Exact-particle-number positional energy shell: the shell is a conditional measure of exactly Nn positions with a shrinking reduced energy-density window; it is not a phase-space shell.

[A1]

Finite-volume equilibrium ensemble sampling: finite canonical and grand laws use the adopted indistinguishable positional measure, with infinite-energy configurations assigned zero weight for β>0. For comparison with the mathematical partitions, use e−β^H^=0 at H^=+∞; finite-energy Boltzmann factors agree because β^H^=βH.

[A2]

Selected grand-variational phase uniqueness: on the finite-intensity stationary-law domain, the selected grand variational minimizer is the singleton P∗; the physical functional I+βΦ−ρlog⁡z agrees with its numerical form because β^=E0β and Φ^=Φ/E0, where Φ is positional energy density and Φ^ its numerical value.

[L0]

Superstable regular pair interactions and configurational ensemble notation: the current definition requires AC, an even Borel potential, a decomposition φ^=φs+φr with φs stable, φr≥0, and φr(x)≥δ whenever ∥x∥∞≤r0 for some δ,r0>0, plus its specified lower and upper regularity tails. The definition carrier is present as a draft; its scoped proof-contract entry passes, with current owner Step 1 proof-readiness recorded and independent review pending.

[L1]

Controlled shrinking energy-density shell and three-ensemble equivalence: the current statement assumes the superstable regular periodic fixed-N model, an interior density, positive numerical inverse temperature, differentiability of the canonical rate, a finite supporting activity, and a singleton grand minimizer. It gives some constructed δL↓0 for which the exact-N canonical, matching grand, and uniform positional energy-density shell empirical fields converge in probability in τL; its proof Step 2.1 also establishes that the canonical probability of the selected shell tends to one, as needed for the entropy bound below. It excludes arbitrary widths and phase-space shells. Its current draft statement/proof carrier and scoped batch-18 proof-contract entries pass; current owner Step 1 proof-readiness is recorded and independent review remains pending, so this use remains conditional.

[L2]

Periodic fixed-particle canonical limit: the current statement defines the periodic exact-N canonical rate Fβ^(ρ) for NL/VL→ρ at positive interior density and gives the periodic partition limit; it also states the periodic canonical accumulation-point conclusion. Its current draft statement/proof carrier and scoped batch-18 proof-contract entry pass; current owner Step 1 proof-readiness is recorded and independent review remains pending.

[L3]

Fixed-particle local ensemble equivalence at interior density: the current statement puts every free exact-N canonical local accumulation point in the common grand variational minimizer set at a finite supporting activity, and gives convergence under uniqueness at a uniformly sampled bulk location, not a fixed boundary origin. Its current draft statement/proof carrier and scoped batch-18 proof-contract entry pass; current owner Step 1 proof-readiness is recorded and independent review remains pending; it remains an explicit conditional supporting input to the exact-N canonical conclusion.

[L4]

Periodic preparation and local-tame transfer from entropy bounds: periodic translation invariance identifies the continued law with the empirical-field barycenter, and bounded finite-volume entropy density supplies count-tail uniformity and local-tame transfer. This draft mathematical result is used conditionally under its declared choice hypotheses.

Proof

Given: The exact physical positional shell convention, its numerical energy conversion, the stated set-theoretic assumptions, adopted canonical/grand preparations, differentiability and interior-density hypotheses, and the actual draft mathematical statement [L1]. The unique-minimizer condition is an explicit premise.

1.1givenF1F2A1A2L0L1L2L3algebra

Translate the centered cube Λn by Ln/2 in each coordinate to [0,Ln)d. This preserves the positional sector measures, particle number, every periodic pair displacement and its image energy, so the physical periodic law matches the mathematical supplier's cell convention. The Borel superstable regular assumptions match [L0], and the hypotheses in the Statement match [L1]–[L3], including exact particle number, periodic boundary, interior density, differentiability, finite supporting α, and singleton minimizer [A2]. [L2] fixes the periodic canonical rate. The periodic canonical conclusion uses [L1] and [L2]; the free-box result [L3] is not substituted for a periodic law. The carrier [L1] explicitly concerns positional pair energy, so [F1]–[F2] identify the physical shell with its positional shell law without adding kinetic energy; the chain rule gives e/E0=−∂β^F, and δ^n=δn/E0 converts its numerical energy window to joules.

2.1givenF1L1L2L4step 1.1algebra∎

By [L1], canonical energy concentration permits construction of a sequence δ^n↓0 such that the shell has positive measure eventually and its uniform conditional law, the exact-N canonical law, and the matching grand law have empirical fields converging in probability to P∗. Each periodic preparation is translation-invariant on its torus. Their finite-volume entropy densities are bounded: the canonical normalization, supporting activity and bounded canonical mean energy give this for the canonical law; for the shell, its entropy is the negative logarithm of its Poisson event probability, bounded using its eventually high canonical probability and the energy window; the grand pressure identity gives the grand bound. Apply [L4] to transfer all three empirical-field limits to their periodically continued laws for local tame observables. Set δn=E0δ^n; therefore the physical shell widths shrink in joules per reference volume and expectations converge for each stated bounded-region observable of at-most-linear count growth.

Physics theoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedverified 2026-10-15 (gpt-6-luna, gpt-6.1-sol, and delegated Codex review/repair agents; see completed run evidence)Open item page →

Qualified van Hove and tempered-exterior thermodynamic limits

Physical scope

Classical positional Borel pair systems in dimension at least two; van Hove free-wall limits require superstability and regularity, while deterministic exterior limits additionally require a genuine positive divergent core in the supplier's infinity norm and a fixed uniformly tempered exterior class.

Statement

Assume AC, as required by the current mathematical definition and its shape suppliers. Let d≥2, E0=1 J, φ^=φ/E0, and assume φ^ is Borel measurable and superstable and regular as in Superstable regular pair interactions and configurational ensemble notation. Use H^=H/E0 and β^=E0(kBT)−1>0 in the mathematical rates. Let (Λk) be a van Hove sequence as in Van Hove regions and uniformly tempered exterior preparations. First, for free walls, the positional grand pressure along Λk converges to the free-cube pressure of Stable-tempered free-cube grand pressure. For any positive interior attainable density ρ (particle count per dimensionless reference volume, with physical density ρ/ℓ0d in m−d) and exact integers Nk with Nk/∣Λk∣→ρ, the exact-Nk free-wall canonical log-partition rate converges to the same cube canonical rate. These two shape statements require superstability and regularity; stability alone is not asserted to suffice for arbitrary van Hove shapes.

Second, strengthen the potential hypothesis: for some r0>0, φ^(x)≥χ^(∥x∥∞)>0 whenever 0<∥x∥∞≤r0, where χ^:(0,r0]→(0,∞) is finite-valued and nonincreasing and ∫0r0χ^(r)rd−1 dr=+∞. For each fixed 0≤t<∞, the free-wall grand pressure in Λn with exterior ζ∈Ω(t) then converges uniformly in ζ to the same free-cube pressure. The exterior interaction is the deterministic positional term of Van Hove regions and uniformly tempered exterior preparations, not a volume-filling external field. This genuine divergent-core condition is the exact stronger hypothesis of the current exterior supplier; it is not inferred from superstability or replaced by a weaker source condition.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

Stable regularly tempered classical positional preparation: φ is even measurable, stable, and has an integrable decreasing tail. With E0=1 J, H^=H/E0 and β^=E0(kBT)−1 leave each Boltzmann factor unchanged.

[F2]

Van Hove regions and uniformly tempered exterior preparations: the van Hove condition uses the same two-sided Euclidean boundary-layer condition as the mathematical shape suppliers, and Ω(t) uses the same centered unit cells and t≥0 square-count bound as the exterior mathematical supplier.

[A1]

Finite-volume equilibrium ensemble sampling: all grand and canonical laws are positional and use the adopted indistinguishable measure; for β>0, infinite-energy configurations receive zero weight. The mathematical comparison uses the same extended-real extension, e−β^H^=0 at H^=+∞.

[L0]

Superstable regular pair interactions and configurational ensemble notation: the current definition assumes AC, requires an even Borel potential, a stable-plus-nonnegative superstable splitting with a positive lower bound on an ℓ∞-ball, and its lower/upper regularity tails; it separately defines the genuine divergent positive core. The definition carrier is present as a draft; its proof-contract entry passes, with current owner Step 1 proof-readiness recorded and independent review pending.

[L1]

Free-wall pressure on arbitrary van Hove shapes under superstability: the current statement gives free-wall grand-pressure convergence to the free-cube rate on every van Hove sequence under superstability and regularity; its text expressly does not assert stability alone. The item and draft proof text are present and the scoped batch-18 proof-contract check passes, but current owner Step 1 proof-readiness is recorded and independent review remains pending; this use remains conditional.

[L2]

Exact canonical limit on arbitrary van Hove shapes: the current statement gives the free-wall exact-Nk positional log-partition rate on van Hove regions for Nk/∣Λk∣→ρ at a positive interior attainable density, under superstability and regularity. Its current draft statement/proof carrier and scoped batch-18 proof-contract entry pass; current owner Step 1 proof-readiness is recorded and independent review remains pending; this use remains conditional.

[L3]

Uniform exterior-pressure limit for tempered configurations: the current statement gives uniform free-wall grand-pressure convergence for each fixed exterior class Ω(t) under stable regularity and the genuine divergent positive core φ^(x)≥χ^(∥x∥∞) with divergent radial integral. Its item and draft proof text are present and the scoped batch-18 proof-contract check passes, but current owner Step 1 proof-readiness is recorded and independent review remains pending; this use remains conditional.

Proof

Given: The physical finite-volume law and numerical energy conversion, AC, definitions of geometry and exterior preparation in [F2], and the actual draft mathematical supplier statements [L1]–[L3]. Their unresolved proof status remains conditional input.

1.1givenF1F2A1L0L1

Under the Borel superstable regular hypotheses of [L0] and the physical pair assumptions [F1], the van Hove sequence in the statement satisfies the same two-sided Euclidean boundary-layer condition as the shape supplier in [L1]. The free-wall grand-pressure result then identifies its limit with the free-cube pressure. The physical grand normalizer and pressure are the ones fixed in [A1] and the earlier free-cube theorem.

2.1givenF1F2A1L2step 1.1

For an interior attainable ρ and the stated Nk, [L2] gives convergence of the exact-Nk free-wall canonical log-partition rate to the same cube canonical rate. Its boundary-layer hypothesis is precisely the van Hove condition in [F2].

2.2givenF1F2A1L0L3step 1.1

Under the additional positive divergent-core condition defined in [L0], every ζ∈Ω(t) meets the fixed exterior class in [F2]; [L3] gives uniform convergence of its grand pressure to the free-cube pressure. This conclusion is uniform only for the fixed t class and does not cover a potential applied throughout a volume.

3.1step 1.1step 2.1step 2.2L1L2L3∎

Combining the three conditional limits proves exactly the two stated boundary regimes. The superstability and genuine-core assumptions remain distinct, so neither result is extended to stability alone or to arbitrary external fields.

5 · Examples, experiments and counterexamples

None yet.

Sources