Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

✓ 2 results · all verified · 0 also independently AI-judged
Every result on this page is machine-checked by a proof checker and read in full by a delegated reviewing agent on the owner's instruction; the judge is an additional, independent cross-model AI review of the proofs. The 2 not AI-judged were verified by owner audit (typically over a confirmed judge false positive), not failures.

Torus knots and Seifert-fibered exteriors — Examples and Counterexamples

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Logical flowchart

3 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

None yet.

4 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

Worked cases of torus knots

Example

Assume the full Axiom of Choice. For T(2,3), the exterior group is ⟨x,y∣x2=y3⟩, a central fiber is h=x2=y3, a positive meridian is μ=y2x−1, and a preferred longitude is λ=hμ−6. Its Alexander polynomial is Δ(t)≐t2−t+1 and its genus is 1. For T(1,5), the group presentation reduces to Z, the knot is the unknot, the Alexander polynomial is 1, and the genus is 0.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Full AC, the coprime torus knots T(2,3) and T(1,5), and the formulas of the A page.

[A1]

Full AC supplies the countable-choice hypotheses used by the knot and genus statements (The Axiom of Choice).

[F1]

Torus-knot exterior group and peripheral system gives π1(ET(p,q))=⟨x,y∣xp=yq⟩, h=xp=yq, and μ=yαxβ, λ=hμ−pq when pα+qβ=1.

[F2]

Torus-knot Alexander polynomial and genus formulas gives ΔT(p,q)≐(t∣pq∣−1)(t−1)/((t∣p∣−1)(t∣q∣−1)) and g(T(p,q))=(∣p∣−1)(∣q∣−1)/2.

[F3]

Unit-slope torus knots are unknots says T(p,q) is the unknot when ∣p∣=1 or ∣q∣=1.

Verification

1.1A1F1givenalgebra

For (p,q)=(2,3) the group relation is x2=y3, and this common element h is central. The equation 2α+3β=1 has solution (α,β)=(2,−1), so [F1] gives μ=y2x−1 and λ=hμ−6.

1.2F2step 1.1algebra

Substituting (2,3) into [F2] gives Δ(t)≐(t6−1)(t−1)(t2−1)(t3−1)=t3+1t+1=t2−t+1, and g=(2−1)(3−1)/2=1.

1.3F1givenalgebra

For (p,q)=(1,5), the relation x=y5 eliminates x and leaves the infinite cyclic group generated by y. The meridian equation has solution (α,β)=(1,0), so [F1] gives μ=y and λ=hμ−5=1 in the group.

2.1A1L1F2F3step 1.3algebra∎

Full AC [A1] supplies the countable-choice hypothesis of [F3] by [L1], so [F3] identifies T(1,5) with the unknot. In [F2] the quotient cancels to 1 and the genus expression is 0, giving the stated Alexander polynomial and genus.

CounterexampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

Noncoprime torus slopes can be links

Statement refuted

Assume the full Axiom of Choice. The claim that every nonzero integer pair (p,q) determines a single torus knot and satisfies the coprime torus-knot genus formula is false: (p,q)=(2,2) determines a two-component link.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Full AC and the nonzero parameter pair (2,2).

[A1]

Full AC is the choice-function axiom used by the knot and formula statements (The Axiom of Choice).

[L1]

Full AC implies Countable Choice, the hypothesis of the torus-knot definition (AC implies DC implies countable choice, The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

[F1]

Coprime torus knot specifies that when d=gcd⁡(∣p∣,∣q∣)>1, the corresponding torus link is the union of d disjoint parallel copies of the primitive slope (p/d,q/d).

[F2]

Torus-knot Alexander polynomial and genus formulas assumes coprime nonzero parameters and defines genus for a single knot.

Counterexample

1.1A1F2givenalgebra

The greatest common divisor of ∣2∣ and ∣2∣ is d=2>1, so the pair (2,2) is outside the coprime hypothesis in [F2].

2.1A1L1F1step 1.1construct

Full AC [A1] supplies the countable-choice hypothesis of [F1] by [L1]. The associated torus link then consists of d=2 disjoint parallel copies of the primitive slope (2/2,2/2)=(1,1). The two copies are separate embedded circles, so the result has two components and is not a knot.

3.1F2step 1.1step 2.1algebra∎

The knot genus formula in [F2] has no application to this pair: its coprimality hypothesis fails and its knot-genus input is not a single-component knot. Thus this example refutes extending that knot formula to all nonzero integer pairs.

Sources