Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Compatible finite elements, constraints and coercive error control

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, postulates, theorems and proofs

DefinitionDefinition: AI-adaptedProof: Not applicableprecheck passverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

PEC Whitney edge-face Maxwell semidiscretization

Physical scope

A finite-dimensional, lowest-order, PEC edge-face Galerkin model of linear Maxwell evolution in a bounded laboratory polyhedron. Static measurable uniformly positive symmetric permittivity and permeability, and an optional bounded symmetric nonnegative conductivity field, are explicit model data in SI units. The definition asserts no continuum convergence, no existence of a continuum solution, no arbitrary H(curl) edge trace, and no empirical claim.

Definition

Assume Countable Choice as in the real L^2 and weak-derivative conventions. Let I be a nonempty open interval in R, and let Omega be a nonempty bounded Lipschitz polyhedron in one SI laboratory frame under Framework-local SI units, the vacuum constants and the exact/measured status of their values. Let T be a finite matching affine tetrahedral mesh with realization closure(Omega), with mesh and orientation conventions as in Lowest-order Whitney and Nedelec de Rham spaces. Use the real graph space H(curl;Omega) of The real H(curl) graph space on a polyhedron and define H_0(curl;Omega) by the closure of C_c^\infty(Omega;R^3) in that graph norm, as in Zero tangential trace H(curl) space. Define H_0^1(Omega) as the closure of C_c^\infty(Omega;R) in W^{1,2}(Omega;R), using the norm and closure conventions of Integer-order Sobolev spaces and their norms.

Let W_h^0 be the continuous piecewise P1 scalar space, where P1(K) is the real scalar-polynomial space of total degree at most one on tetrahedron K. On K with barycentric coordinates lambda_0,...,lambda_3, the lowest-order Whitney edge space is spanned by phi_ij=lambda_i grad(lambda_j)-lambda_j grad(lambda_i) for its six oriented edges. Globally N_h^1 consists of these piecewise fields with one common oriented circulation integral_e u dot t_e ds on each shared edge e, where t_e is its chosen unit tangent; it is H(curl)-conforming. The face space N_h^2 consists of piecewise RT0 fields, RT0(K)={x -> a+c x:a in R3,c in R}, with one common oriented flux integral_F u dot n_F dS on each shared face F, where n_F is its oriented unit normal; it is H(div)-conforming in the graph space The real H(div) space. N_h^3 consists of cellwise constants. These spaces are the full spaces in Lowest-order Whitney and Nedelec de Rham spaces. Set S_h := W_h^0 intersect H_0^1(Omega), V_h := N_h^1 intersect H_0(curl;Omega), and M_h := N_h^2. The finite-dimensional map grad:S_h -> V_h is well-defined: for q in S_h, its weak gradient is L^2, curl(grad q)=0 distributionally, and a sequence from C_c^\infty converging to q in W^{1,2} has gradients converging to grad q in H(curl). On each tetrahedron K with vertices v_0,...,v_3, write q_i:=q(v_i) for the nodal values of the continuous piecewise-affine representative; then

∇q∣K=∑0≤i<j≤3(qj−qi)ϕij.

This identity puts grad q in the local Whitney edge span and gives its oriented circulation q_j-q_i along [v_i,v_j]; the shared endpoint values agree between cells because q is continuous. Take the canonical full-space nodal and edge reference bases from Lowest-order Whitney and Nedelec de Rham spaces. Since S_h and V_h are finite-dimensional subspaces of the full nodal and edge spaces, choose any bases chi_1,...,chi_ng of S_h and phi_1,...,phi_ne of V_h obtained by dimensionless real linear combinations of those reference bases. Choose psi_1,...,psi_nb for M_h dual to all oriented face-flux degrees of freedom, and theta_1,...,theta_nc for N_h^3 dual to the cell-integral degrees of freedom, with theta_l=|K_l|^-1 on cell K_l and zero on the other cells. Thus chi_j is dimensionless, phi_i has units m^-1, psi_alpha has units m^-2, and theta_l has units m^-3. Define the real coordinate matrices C,D,G by curl(phi_i)=sum_alpha C_{alpha i} psi_alpha, div(psi_alpha)=sum_l D_{l alpha} theta_l, and grad(chi_j)=sum_i G_{ij} phi_i. These matrices are dimensionless representations of the oriented differentials; D is the face-to-cell incidence matrix in the face-moment basis, and changes of basis in S_h,V_h give the corresponding matrices for their PEC subspaces. Because curl grad=0 and div curl=0 on the full finite-element complex, DC=0 and CG=0. Here D denotes only the magnetic face-to-cell incidence matrix.

Write Sym_3(R) for the real symmetric 3 by 3 matrices. Let epsilon,mu:Omega -> Sym_3(R) be measurable, essentially bounded, time-independent coefficient fields with constants 0<a_epsilon<=b_epsilon<infinity and 0<a_mu<=b_mu<infinity such that almost everywhere

aε∣v∣2≤v⋅ε(x)v≤bε∣v∣2,aμ∣v∣2≤v⋅μ(x)v≤bμ∣v∣2(v∈R3).

Their units are F m^-1 and H m^-1. Pointwise inversion makes mu^-1 measurable, symmetric and essentially bounded, with eigenvalues between b_mu^-1 and a_mu^-1. These coefficient fields are explicit local model data; no material-realization or constitutive derivation is asserted. Let sigma:Omega -> Sym_3(R) be another measurable, essentially bounded, time-independent field with sigma(x) positive semidefinite almost everywhere and units S m^-1. Let J_ext:I -> L^2(Omega;R^3) be continuous in time and have units A m^-2.

Define the real matrices and current-load vector by

(Me)ij:=∫Ωϕi⋅εϕj dx,(Mb)αβ:=∫Ωψα⋅μ−1ψβ dx,Sij:=∫Ωϕi⋅σϕj dx,ji(t):=∫Ωϕi⋅Jext(x,t) dx.

All integrals are finite because the mesh is finite, its basis functions are piecewise polynomial, and the coefficient fields are essentially bounded. M_e and M_b are symmetric positive definite on nonzero basis spaces: their quadratic forms are the positive coefficient-weighted L^2 norms of the represented fields; if a basis space is zero-dimensional, the positive-definiteness condition is vacuous. S is symmetric positive semidefinite. The oriented matrices satisfy DC=CG=0. The edge coefficients e_i have units V and the edge basis functions units m^-1; the face coefficients b_alpha have units Wb and the face basis functions units m^-2. The incidence matrices C,D,G are dimensionless, M_e has units F, M_b has units H^-1, S has units S, and j has units A.

For C1 coefficient vectors e:I -> R^ne and b:I -> R^nb, define E_h(t):=sum_i e_i(t)phi_i and B_h(t):=sum_alpha b_alpha(t)psi_alpha, and put H_h:=mu^-1 B_h in L^2. The perfect-electric-conductor (PEC) semidiscrete model is the weak Galerkin system

∫Ω(ε ∂tEh+σEh+Jext)⋅vh dx=∫ΩHh⋅curl⁡vh dx(vh∈Vh),∂tBh=−curl⁡Ehin Mh.

Here H_h is required only to be L^2; no H(curl) regularity or boundary trace for it is asserted. Testing the first identity against the edge basis and expanding the second in the face basis gives exactly M_e dot e=C^T M_b b-Se-j and dot b=-Ce, the finite compatible matrix system. The quadratic semidiscrete energy is the finite Joule-valued quantity one-half times the integral of E_h dot epsilon E_h plus B_h dot mu^-1 B_h.

Physics theoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

Discrete Maxwell energy balance and exact incidence constraints

Physical scope

A conditional finite-dimensional Galerkin deduction for the lowest-order PEC Maxwell semidiscretization defined on a matching tetrahedral mesh with static symmetric uniformly positive material tensors, a symmetric nonnegative conductivity form, continuous forcing, and the stated compatible incidence maps. It gives exact semidiscrete energy and constraint identities, but no continuum convergence claim, no automatic charge-deposition scheme, no claim about actual materials, and no empirical conclusion.

Statement

Assume Countable Choice and the semidiscrete model of PEC Whitney edge-face Maxwell semidiscretization on a nonempty open time interval I. For every t0 in I, initial vectors e(t0)=e0 and b(t0)=b0, and continuous forcing J_ext:I -> L^2(Omega;R3), the finite compatible matrix system for the edge and face coefficients has a unique C1 solution on all of I. Define

Wh(t):=12∫Ω(Eh(x,t)⋅ε(x)Eh(x,t)+Bh(x,t)⋅μ(x)−1Bh(x,t)) dx,q(t):=−GTMee(t).

Then for every t in I,

ddtWh(t)=−e(t)TSe(t)−e(t)Tj(t),Db(t)=Db(t0),q˙(t)=GT(Se(t)+j(t)).

The first identity is the exact semidiscrete field-energy balance in joules; e^T S e and e^T j have units watts, representing discrete conductivity loss and source work. The conserved vector D b has units webers and is the face-to-cell magnetic-divergence coordinate. The coordinate q has units coulombs and is the weak discrete-divergence quantity defined by the finite matrix system; dot q has units amperes. This theorem does not infer a nodal charge-deposition method from it.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice, the coefficients and mesh of PEC Whitney edge-face Maxwell semidiscretization, an open interval I, t0 in I, initial coefficient vectors e0,b0, and J_ext in C(I;L^2(Omega;R3)).

[F1]

PEC Whitney edge-face Maxwell semidiscretization: the assembled matrices M_e,M_b are symmetric positive definite on nonzero finite-dimensional spaces, S is symmetric positive semidefinite, DC=CG=0, J_ext is continuous into L^2, and the weak Galerkin equations are exactly M_e dot e=C^T M_b b-Se-j and dot b=-Ce. Continuity of each load coordinate j_i follows in step 1.1 from the L^2 pairing.

[F2]

Energy, existence and algebraic constraints: for that finite compatible matrix system and continuous j, every initial state has a unique C1 solution on I, with W'(e,b)=-e^TSe-e^Tj, Db(t)=Db(t0), and dot q=G^T(Se+j) for q=-G^TM_e e.

[A1]

Countable Choice is inherited from the graph-space and real-L^2 conventions in the finite-element definition; the finite-dimensional ODE argument introduces no stronger choice principle. The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)

Proof

1.1givenF1F2A1algebra

By [F1], the semidiscrete Galerkin equations in the chosen edge and face bases are exactly the finite compatible matrix system; the positivity and compatibility hypotheses required by [F2] hold. Countable Choice is the stated graph-space strength [A1]. Each coordinate j_i(t) is continuous because J_ext is continuous in L^2 and phi_i is a fixed L^2 basis function, so Cauchy-Schwarz makes t -> integral(phi_i dot J_ext(t)) continuous. Applying [F2] gives a unique C1 coefficient solution for every initial pair on all of I.

2.1F1F2step 1.1algebra∎

The definitions of M_e and M_b give e^T M_e e=integral(E_h dot epsilon E_h) and b^T M_b b=integral(B_h dot mu^-1 B_h), so W_h is exactly the matrix energy W(e,b) in [F2]. Its derivative is therefore -e^T S e-e^T j. Since S is positive semidefinite, e^T S e>=0; this is a model deduction of discrete dissipation, not an observation about a material. For the same solution established in step 1.1, [F2] also gives D b(t)=D b(t0) and dot q=G^T(S e+j), with q=-G^T M_e e as defined in the Statement. The former is the exact face-to-cell magnetic-divergence constraint; the latter is the stated weak discrete-divergence evolution and does not infer a nodal charge-deposition method.

Physics theoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

Coercive shifted Maxwell Galerkin approximation

Physical scope

A conditional static-coefficient, lossless positive-shift weak Maxwell model on a bounded Lipschitz polyhedron with closure-defined PEC electric space and a shape-regular refining family of conforming lowest-order edge spaces. The theorem gives well-posedness and best-approximation convergence in a dimensionally scaled graph norm. It gives no real-frequency uniqueness, no error rate without further regularity, no assertion that any actual material satisfies the model, and no empirical claim.

Statement

Assume Countable Choice. Let Omega be a nonempty bounded Lipschitz polyhedron in R3 in one SI laboratory frame. Use the real space V:=H_0(curl;Omega), where H_0(curl;Omega) is the graph closure of compactly supported smooth vector fields as defined by the mathematical supplier. Let epsilon,mu:Omega -> Sym_3(R) be static measurable essentially bounded fields with units F m^-1 and H m^-1 and constants 0<a_epsilon<=b_epsilon<infinity and 0<a_mu<=b_mu<infinity such that, almost everywhere,

aε∣v∣2≤v⋅ε(x)v≤bε∣v∣2,aμ∣v∣2≤v⋅μ(x)v≤bμ∣v∣2(v∈R3).

Take the lossless branch sigma=0 of the semidiscrete Maxwell model. Fix a reference length ell_0>0 in metres, and equip V with the equivalent, dimensionally homogeneous graph norm

∥v∥V,ℓ02:=∥v∥L2(Ω)2+ℓ02∥curl⁡v∥L2(Ω)2.

Let s>0 be a real frequency-shift parameter in s^-1, let F:V -> R be a bounded real linear functional scaled so that F(v) has units W s^-1 when v has electric-field units V m^-1, and define

as(u,v):=∫Ω(μ−1curl⁡u⋅curl⁡v+s2εu⋅v) dx.

Let {T_n}{n>=1} be a shape-regular family of matching affine tetrahedral meshes of closure(Omega), with h_n:=max{K in T_n} diam(K) tending to zero. For each mesh set V_n:=N_{h_n}^1 intersect H_0(curl;Omega), using the PEC Whitney edge space of PEC Whitney edge-face Maxwell semidiscretization. Let

α:=min⁡{(bμℓ02)−1, s2aε},M:=max⁡{(aμℓ02)−1, s2bε}.

Then there is a unique u in V satisfying a_s(u,v)=F(v) for every v in V. For each n there is a unique Galerkin solution u_n in V_n satisfying a_s(u_n,v_n)=F(v_n) for every v_n in V_n. For every n,

∥u−un∥V,ℓ0≤Mαinf⁡vn∈Vn∥u−vn∥V,ℓ0,

and u_n converges to u in the V,ell_0 norm as n tends to infinity. Both alpha and M have units (H m)^-1, so their ratio is dimensionless.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The coefficient, domain, SI, and closure-defined PEC conventions in the Statement; Countable Choice; and the stated mesh family.

[F1]

Finite-energy PEC and impedance boundary formulation: epsilon and mu are real symmetric static multiplication fields, essentially bounded, with almost-everywhere uniform positive lower and upper bounds. Their SI units are F m^-1 and H m^-1.

[F2]

The real H(curl) graph space on a polyhedron and Zero tangential trace H(curl) space: H(curl;Omega) is the real L^2 graph space of the distributional curl with norm squared ||v||_2^2+||curl v||_2^2; H_0(curl;Omega) is exactly the closure of C_c^\infty(Omega;R3) in that graph norm. The graph closure is not replaced by an unproved trace-kernel identification.

[F3]

The Lax--Milgram theorem: on a real Hilbert space, a bounded coercive real bilinear form and a bounded real linear functional have a unique weak solution.

[F4]

Uniformly bounded commuting projection for lowest-order Nedelec spaces: for this shape-regular refining tetrahedral family there are boundary-corrected projections pi_{h,0}^1:H_0(curl;Omega)->N_h^1 intersect H_0(curl;Omega), identity on each target space and strongly convergent in the graph norm on H_0(curl;Omega). The theorem does not identify these projections with raw edge moments.

[F6]

PEC Whitney edge-face Maxwell semidiscretization and Lowest-order Whitney and Nedelec de Rham spaces: for each mesh in the family the conforming PEC trial space is exactly V_n=N_{h_n}^1 intersect H_0(curl;Omega); the underlying lowest-order space on a finite mesh is finite-dimensional.

[A1]

Countable Choice is the exact choice strength of the imported real L^2 and weak-derivative interfaces; the local Hilbert-space and finite-element arguments add no stronger choice axiom. The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω) L2 with the integral pairing is a Hilbert space

Proof

1.1F2A1algebra

The distributional graph of curl is closed: if v_j->v and curl v_j->w in L^2, then for every compactly supported smooth test field phi, integral(v dot curl phi)=lim_j integral(v_j dot curl phi)=lim_j integral(curl v_j dot phi)=integral(w dot phi); hence curl v=w distributionally. L^2 is complete under [A1] and L2 with the integral pairing is a Hilbert space, so H(curl;Omega) is Hilbert, and its graph-closed subspace H_0(curl;Omega) is Hilbert. Since ell_0 is fixed and positive, ||.||_{V,ell_0} is equivalent to the defining graph norm and gives the same complete space.

1.2givenF1algebra

From [F1], the eigenvalues of mu^-1 lie between b_mu^-1 and a_mu^-1. Therefore a_s(v,v)>=b_mu^-1||curl v||_2^2+s^2a_epsilon||v||2^2>=alpha||v||{V,ell_0}^2. Cauchy-Schwarz and the upper coefficient bounds give |a_s(u,v)|<=a_mu^-1||curl u||_2||curl v||_2+s^2b_epsilon||u||2||v||2<=M||u||{V,ell_0}||v||{V,ell_0}. Since s has units s^-1, ell_0 has units m, and epsilon and mu have units F m^-1 and H m^-1 by [F1], both constants have units (H m)^-1; alpha>0 and M<infinity by the stated strict bounds.

2.1F3F6step 1.1step 1.2given

Apply [F3] to the real Hilbert space and form of steps 1.1-1.2 to obtain the unique u. By [F6], each V_n is finite-dimensional and closed in V; restricting the same bounded coercive form and F to V_n gives the unique Galerkin solution u_n, including the zero-space case. If F=0, the zero vector is the solution on V and on every V_n by uniqueness.

3.1step 1.2step 2.1algebra

Put e_n:=u-u_n. For any w_n in V_n, Galerkin orthogonality gives a_s(e_n,u_n-w_n)=0, so a_s(e_n,e_n)=a_s(e_n,u-w_n). Coercivity and boundedness from step 1.2 imply alpha||e_n||{V,ell_0}^2<=a_s(e_n,e_n)<=M||e_n||{V,ell_0}||u-w_n||_{V,ell_0}. If e_n=0 the asserted estimate is immediate; otherwise divide by alpha||e_n|| and take the infimum over w_n.

4.1F4step 3.1algebra∎

By [F4], pi_{h_n,0}^1 u belongs to V_n and converges to u in the unscaled H(curl) graph norm; equivalence of the fixed ell_0-scaled norm gives ||u-pi_{h_n,0}^1u||_{V,ell_0}->0. Thus the best-approximation infimum in step 3.1 tends to zero, and the error estimate proves u_n->u in V,ell_0. No interpolation by pointwise edge restrictions is used.

Physics theoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

Absolute and PEC-relative discrete Maxwell zero modes

Physical scope

A conditional mathematical statement about the full absolute Whitney mesh complex and the separate closure-defined PEC relative edge complex used by the semidiscrete Maxwell model. The full-complex mode count uses Countable Choice; the relative-family compactness and quotient bound require the stronger choice, regular-decomposition, projection, domain, and mesh assumptions stated. It makes no empirical claim and does not identify relative PEC modes with absolute Betti numbers.

Statement

Let T be a finite matching affine tetrahedral mesh whose realization is closure(Omega), with Omega a nonempty bounded Lipschitz polyhedron. Let W_h^0,N_h^1,N_h^2,N_h^3 be the full lowest-order Whitney de Rham spaces of Lowest-order Whitney and Nedelec de Rham spaces, and use their real L^2 inner products. Define

Hh1:=ker⁡(curl⁡∣Nh1)∩(∇Wh0)⊥,Hh2:=ker⁡(div⁡∣Nh2)∩(curl⁡Nh1)⊥,βk:=dim⁡RHk(∣T∣;R)(k=1,2).

Under Countable Choice, dim_R H_h^1=beta_1 and dim_R H_h^2=beta_2 for the full complex. These are the harmonic complements for the full, absolute finite-element complex.

For the separate PEC-relative family, assume the full Axiom of Choice, including its Countable Choice and Dependent Choice consequences, and let {T_h} be a shape-regular family of matching affine tetrahedral meshes of the same Omega with h=max_K diam(K)->0. Assume also the exact full-Dirichlet H(curl) regular decomposition and the relative commuting-projection hypotheses stated in Facts & Assumptions below. For each mesh write V_h:=N_h^1 intersect H_0(curl;Omega), S_h:=W_h^0 intersect H_0^1(Omega), K_h:=ker(curl|_{V_h}), B_h:=grad S_h, and H_h^rel:=K_h intersect B_h^\perp, with orthogonality in real L^2. Put

Xh:={vh∈Vh:(vh,∇qh)L2=0 for every qh∈Sh},Zh:=Vh∩Kh⊥.

Then K_h=B_h direct-sum H_h^rel, every sequence v_h in X_h bounded in H(curl;Omega) has an L^2-convergent subsequence, and there is a constant C independent of h such that ||v_h||_2<=C||curl v_h||_2 for every v_h in Z_h; the constant C has units metres when v_h is an electric field. If H_h^rel contains a nonzero vector for a mesh, that vector lies in X_h and has zero curl, so no curl Poincare inequality holds on that X_h. The full-complex absolute Betti count in the first clause is not asserted for this relative PEC kernel.

Diagram

The diagram gives the moment-coordinate identification for the full complex. The vertical arrows send a piecewise scalar to its vertex values, an edge field to its oriented edge circulations, a face field to its oriented face fluxes, and a cellwise constant to its cell integrals. The bottom arrows are oriented simplicial coboundaries. The commuting squares mean that the edge, face, and cell moments of grad, curl, and div are the signed sums on the corresponding oriented boundaries. This is the finite-complex interface proved by the cited mathematical supplier; no proof step below relies on the drawing.

\begin{tikzcd}
W_h^0 \arrow[r,"\nabla"] \arrow[d,"\cong"'] &
N_h^1 \arrow[r,"\operatorname{curl}"] \arrow[d,"\cong"'] &
N_h^2 \arrow[r,"\operatorname{div}"] \arrow[d,"\cong"'] &
N_h^3 \arrow[d,"\cong"] \\
C^0(\mathcal T;\mathbb R) \arrow[r,"\delta^0"] &
C^1(\mathcal T;\mathbb R) \arrow[r,"\delta^1"] &
C^2(\mathcal T;\mathbb R) \arrow[r,"\delta^2"] &
C^3(\mathcal T;\mathbb R)
\end{tikzcd}

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The full mesh complex above with Countable Choice. For the separate relative-family clause, also assume the Axiom of Choice, the shape-regular refining family on a bounded Lipschitz polyhedron, and the precise regular-decomposition and projection interfaces below.

[A1]

Countable Choice is the choice hypothesis of the full lowest-order cohomology theorem and the real L^2 interfaces. The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)

[A2]

The relative-family theorem assumes the full Axiom of Choice; its uses include the Countable Choice and Dependent Choice consequences explicitly listed by that theorem. The Axiom of Choice The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an N-indexed chain The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)

[F1]

Lowest-order Whitney and Nedelec de Rham spaces: W_h^0 is continuous piecewise P1; N_h^1 is the assembled lowest-order Whitney edge space with one oriented circulation per global edge; N_h^2 is the assembled RT0 face space with one oriented flux per global face; N_h^3 is cellwise constant.

[F2]

Discrete de Rham cohomology and contractible-mesh exactness: under Countable Choice, the degrees of freedom identify the full finite-element complex with the real simplicial cochain complex; its degree-one and degree-two harmonic complements have dimensions dim_R H_1(|T|;R) and dim_R H_2(|T|;R). The theorem does not identify this absolute complex with a PEC-relative complex.

[F3]

PEC Whitney edge-face Maxwell semidiscretization: H_0(curl) is the closure-defined PEC space, S_h=W_h^0 intersect H_0^1, V_h=N_h^1 intersect H_0(curl), and the discrete gradient maps S_h into V_h.

[F4]

A bounded regular decomposition with both summands satisfying full Dirichlet conditions: under the Axiom of Choice, for every nonempty bounded Lipschitz open Omega, each u in H_0(curl;Omega) has u=z+grad q with z in H_0^1(Omega;R3), q in H_0^1(Omega), and ||z||{H^1}+||q||{H^1}<=C_Omega||u||_{H(curl)}. No contractibility or mesh hypothesis is imposed by this decomposition.

[F5]

Uniformly bounded commuting projection for lowest-order Nedelec spaces: for a shape-regular refining family of matching affine tetrahedral meshes, the boundary-corrected relative projections include pi_h^0:H_0^1->S_h and pi_h^1:H_0(curl)->V_h, uniformly bounded in graph norm, identity on their targets, commuting with grad and curl, and strongly convergent on the stated graph domains.

[F6]

Discrete compactness and uniform Poincare inequality for Nedelec fields: under AC, bounded Lipschitz domain and shape-regular refining family, plus the regular decomposition [F4] and relative projections [F5], it proves discrete compactness on X_h and the uniform curl Poincare inequality on Z_h=V_h intersect K_h^\perp. It also states that a nonzero relative harmonic vector obstructs such an inequality on X_h.

Proof

1.1A1F1F2given

For the full clause, [F1] gives exactly the spaces and moment coordinates in [F2]. The finite mesh is matching, its realization is closure(Omega), and Countable Choice is [A1], so all hypotheses of the full discrete de Rham cohomology theorem are met. Applying [F2] gives dim_R H_h^1=beta_1 and dim_R H_h^2=beta_2. These are the full-complex spaces defined in the first clause, not PEC-relative spaces.

1.2A2F3F4F5F6construct

For the relative clause, [A2] supplies AC and its stated CC/DC consequences; the domain and refining-mesh hypotheses are those in the Statement; [F4] is the required full-Dirichlet regular decomposition and [F5] gives the exact relative commuting projections on these same spaces. Thus the hypotheses of [F6] hold. It gives discrete compactness on X_h and the mesh-uniform curl Poincare inequality on Z_h. Since B_h is a subspace of K_h and H_h^rel is its L^2-orthogonal complement within the finite-dimensional K_h, the finite-dimensional orthogonal decomposition gives K_h=B_h direct-sum H_h^rel and Z_h=X_h intersect (H_h^rel)^\perp.

2.1F2F3F6step 1.1step 1.2algebra∎

If h in H_h^rel is nonzero, then h in K_h so curl h=0; also h is orthogonal to B_h, hence h belongs to X_h, and ||h||_2>0. Therefore no estimate ||v_h||_2<=C||curl v_h||_2 can hold on that X_h. This is the stated reason that removing only relative gradients can leave zero modes. It makes no claim that H_h^rel has the absolute dimensions beta_1 or beta_2; those numbers belong only to the full complex in step 1.1.

5 · Examples, experiments and counterexamples

None yet.

Sources