Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Harmonic static multicenter electrovac model

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

Scope

This page translates checked geometric electrovac families into the adopted smooth SI Einstein–Maxwell equation model, then treats the harmonic Majumdar–Papapetrou exterior, its single-center extremal RN correspondence, the constant-radius Bertotti–Robinson product and local RN scaling limit, and an exact null-wave family. The common conversion fixes α=4πGN/(μ0c4) and is proved once before its consumers. The mass, charge, flux and length parameters use the conventions of emg-s01.

The claims are conditional deductions from the adopted zero-cosmological- constant, source-free classical equations. The mathematical suppliers from emg-ms03 are used at their current statements and hypotheses; their draft status and lack of independent proof approval are not converted into acceptance. The sources provide convention and solution context; the exact local equations, coordinate identifications and convergence are supplied by the cited mathematical proofs.

Limits

A harmonic center is removed from the manifold. Its finite-sphere flux is not a proof of matter at that point, horizon regularity, completeness, stability, or a black-hole realization. The Robinson–Bertotti limit is proved only on compact subsets with positive scaled radius. The null-wave family makes no asymptotic-flatness or finite-total-energy claim. No item reports an observation or claims empirical validity.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, postulates, theorems and proofs

Physics theoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passOpen item page →

Geometric electrovac data solve the selected SI equations

Physical scope

Conditional conversion of a smooth zero-cosmological-constant geometric electrovac datum to the source-free branch of the selected SI equation-based Einstein–Maxwell model. It does not assert existence of geometric data, derive or empirically validate a postulate, add material sources, or claim physical realization.

Statement

Let (M,g,N,o,F) be a smooth source-free geometric electrovac datum of Geometric electrovac equations and flux normalization on a nonempty smooth four-manifold. Thus g has signature (−,+,+,+), F is a smooth real two-form, and dF=0,d(⋆gF)=0,Ric⁡ab=2Qab(F),Qab(X):=XacXbc−14gabXcdXcd. Choose constants GN,c,μ0>0 in the SI roles of Einstein–Maxwell primitive quantities and SI conventions, set ε0=(μ0c2)−1,α=4πGNμ0c4,F:=α−1F, and use the same metric and orientation for F. In length coordinates x0=ct, Fab has units T, Fab has units m−1, and α has units T−1m−1 by SI and geometric solution parameter identifications. Define TabEM:=1μ0Qab(F),κE:=8πGNc4. In the adopted postulate Equation-based Einstein–Maxwell model, specialize to Λ=0, j=0, and Tm=0. Then dF=0,∇agFab=0,Gab=κETabEM. This is a conditional model deduction: it neither derives the postulate nor claims that the model describes nature.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The smooth oriented and time-oriented Lorentzian data and geometric electrovac equations above; constants GN,c,μ0>0; the SI-to-geometric normalization from SI and geometric solution parameter identifications; and the zero-source, zero-Λ specialization of the adopted equation-based model.

[F1]

Geometric electrovac equations and flux normalization: the geometric datum has smooth F, signature (−,+,+,+), and equations dF=d(⋆gF)=0 and Ric⁡=2Q(F), with the displayed trace-free quadratic tensor.

[F2]

SI and geometric solution parameter identifications: F=αF and α2=4πGN/(μ0c4); in length coordinates F has units m−1 and F has units T.

[F3]

Einstein–Maxwell primitive quantities and SI conventions: ε0=(μ0c2)−1, κE=8πGN/c4, and the Einstein tensor has units m−2 while stress has units J m−3.

[F4]

Sourced Maxwell sign and current conservation: for vb=∇aFab, d(⋆gF)=−ιvvolg; contraction with the nonvanishing volume form is injective. The current mathematical carrier remains draft; its complete conditional proof and current Step 1 authoring-ready record were inspected, and this use is not independent proof approval.

[F5]

Equation-based Einstein–Maxwell model: the adopted smooth-field equations are dF=0, ∇aFab=−μ0jb, and Gab+Λgab=κE(TabEM+Tabm).

[A1]

The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω): the inherited geometric convention carries only ACω, the assertion that each countable family of nonempty sets has a choice function; the finite pointwise rescaling and contractions below make no choice.

Proof

Given: The hypotheses and definitions in [F1]–[F5], [A1], α>0, and F=α−1F.

1.1givenF1F4algebra

Since α is constant, dF=α−1dF=0 and d(⋆gF)=α−1d(⋆gF)=0 by [F1]. Apply the sign identity [F4] to F: the vanishing of d(⋆gF) gives ιvvolg=0, hence vb=∇aFab=0 at every point.

1.2givenF1F2algebra

Contracting the definition of Q in [F1] gives gabQab(X)=XacXac−(4/4)XcdXcd=0. Therefore [F1] implies the scalar curvature is zero and Gab=Ric⁡ab=2Qab(F). Since Q is quadratic and F=αF, this is Gab=2α2Qab(F).

2.1givenF2F3F5A1step 1.1step 1.2algebra∎

Substituting α2=4πGN/(μ0c4) from [F2] yields Gab=(8πGN/c4)Qab(F)/μ0=κETabEM. Together with step 1.1 and the specialization of [F5], these are exactly the adopted source-free equations. No equation is asserted at a removed point or outside the datum's domain, and the finite rescaling uses no choice beyond [A1].

Physics theoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passOpen item page →

Harmonic static multicenter electrovac model

Physical scope

Conditional source-free classical Einstein–Maxwell model on the smooth exterior of finitely many removed centers, with a common electric sign and positive selected SI mass parameters. Fluxes are through regular spheres. No source is asserted at an excluded center; no horizon extension, completeness, stability, black-hole realization, observation, or empirical validity is claimed.

Statement

Let N≥1 be finite, let a1,…,aN∈R3 be distinct length-coordinate points, choose SI mass parameters m∗,A>0, and fix one sign σ∈{−1,+1}. Set mA:=GNm∗,Ac2,D:=R3∖{a1,…,aN},H(x):=1+∑A=1NmA∣x−aA∣. The positive length parameters mA make H dimensionless and smooth positive harmonic on D. The future unit field is NH=H∂x0, with gH(NH,NH)=−1. Here static means the metric coefficients are independent of x0, have no dx0dxi terms, and are invariant under x0↦−x0; the displayed metric has all three properties. On M=Rx0×D, with x0=ct and the orientation of Positive harmonic conformastatic electrovac data, take gH=−H−2(dx0)2+H2δijdxidxj,Aσ=σ(H−1−1)dx0,Fσ=dAσ,F:=α−1Fσ, where α=4πGN/(μ0c4) as in SI and geometric solution parameter identifications. Under the adopted equation-based model of Equation-based Einstein–Maxwell model with Λ=0, j=0, and Tm=0, these data satisfy the source-free SI equations dF=0,∇agFab=0,Gab=κETabEM. For each A and r>0, define the coordinate sphere and its closed ball by SA(r):={x∈R3:∣x−aA∣=r}.

B‾A(r):={x∈R3:∣x−aA∣≤r}. Orient SA(r) by its outward unit normal relative to the standard orientation of R3. For every such sphere S⊂D, fix any s∈Rx0 and use is,S:S↪M, is,S(x)=(s,x), with the transported outward orientation. Every flux written over S below means the integral of the spacetime form pulled back by is,S; by Finite positive multicenter MP exterior and fluxes these values are independent of s. Whenever B‾A(r) contains no other center, the geometric fluxes are qe(SA(r))=σmA,qm(SA(r))=0. The corresponding SI electric-flux parameter is Qe,A:=ε0c∫SA(r)⋆gF=σ4πε0GN m∗,A, and its magnetic flux ∫SA(r)F is zero. Define the outward-oriented origin-centered sphere by SR:={x∈R3:∣x∣=R}, where the orientation is induced by the outward unit normal relative to the standard orientation of R3. For R>max⁡A∣aA∣, it has the sum of these electric fluxes. These are model parameters and regular-sphere fluxes, not measurements or evidence of regular material sources at the removed points.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A finite nonempty set of distinct centers, positive SI masses, one common sign σ, positive SI constants, and the smooth source-free branch of the adopted equation-based postulate.

[F1]

Positive harmonic conformastatic electrovac data: for smooth positive harmonic H, the metric is gH=−H−2(dx0)2+H2δijdxidxj, with Aσ=σ(H−1−1)dx0 and Fσ=dAσ.

[F2]

Finite positive multicenter MP exterior and fluxes: for finitely many distinct centers and positive lengths mA, H=1+∑AmA/∣x−aA∣ is positive harmonic on the punctured exterior; its geometric sphere fluxes are qe=σmA locally and qe=σ∑AmA outside all centers, with qm=0. This proposition is draft with a complete current proof and Step 1 authoring-ready record; this consumer uses its statement conditionally, not as independent proof approval.

[F3]

Full harmonic Majumdar-Papapetrou Einstein-Maxwell verification: the harmonic data satisfy dFσ=d(⋆gFσ)=0 and Ric⁡=2Q(Fσ). This draft theorem has a complete current proof and Step 1 authoring-ready record; its result is consumed conditionally, without claiming independent approval.

[F4]

Geometric electrovac data solve the selected SI equations: every such geometric electrovac datum, after F=α−1F, satisfies the zero-source SI equation-based Einstein–Maxwell model. This local theorem is draft with its complete proof authored; it is used conditionally and has no independent approval.

[F5]

SI and geometric solution parameter identifications: mA=GNm∗,A/c2, qe=α(4πε0c)−1Qe, qm=α(4π)−1ΦB, and α2=4πGN/(μ0c4).

[F6]

Equation-based Einstein–Maxwell model: the adopted field equations use Gab+Λgab=κE(TabEM+Tabm) and ∇aFab=−μ0jb; this item sets all three sources to zero.

[A1]

The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω): the geometric flux convention inherits only ACω; the finite center family and its finite flux sums require no stronger choice principle.

Proof

Given: The hypotheses and exact current interfaces in [F1]–[F6] and [A1]; in particular N≥1, aA≠aB for A≠B, m∗,A>0, and σ∈{−1,+1}.

1.1givenF1F2F5algebra

Since GN,c,m∗,A>0, each mA=GNm∗,A/c2 is a positive length. The Statement defines SA(r)={x∈R3:∣x−aA∣=r} and its closed ball, with outward Euclidean orientation; if that ball contains no other center, then SA(r)⊂D and the regular-sphere hypothesis of [F2] holds. The formula for H is exactly the finite harmonic family in [F2], so it is smooth, positive, and Euclidean harmonic on D, with the regular-sphere and outer-sphere geometric fluxes stated there.

2.1givenF1F3F4F5F6step 1.1

The data in step 1.1 therefore meet [F1] and the full geometric field equations in [F3]. Apply the SI conversion theorem [F4] with the same constant α from [F5]. The resulting smooth SI two-form F=α−1Fσ satisfies the source-free Maxwell and Einstein equations after the specialization of [F6]. This is a deduction within the adopted model.

2.2givenF2F5step 1.1algebra

Use the smooth embedding is,S and its pullback convention from [F2] on each isolated sphere; its image is a compact oriented sphere in M. The time-independent flux calculation in [F2] gives qe=σmA and qm=0. The SI flux relation in [F5] rearranges to Qe,A=(4πε0c/α)σmA. Substituting mA=GNm∗,A/c2 and ε0μ0c2=1 gives Qe,A=σ4πε0GN m∗,A. Since qm=α(4π)−1∫SF=0 and α>0, the SI magnetic flux vanishes.

3.1givenF2F5A1step 2.2algebra∎

For the origin-centred sphere SR={x:∣x∣=R} with R>max⁡A∣aA∣, [F2] gives qe=σ∑AmA and qm=0. The same linear flux conversion in [F5] gives the sum of the individual SI electric-flux parameters; the finite sum makes no selection or limiting argument under [A1]. The centers remain outside M, so this calculation asserts no equation or regularity at any aA.

Physics theoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passOpen item page →

Single-center extremal charged model correspondence

Physical scope

Equality of the single-center harmonic MP and electric extremal RN model data on their open exteriors under one explicit SI mass/charge parametrization. No horizon extension, global completeness, source at the omitted center, ADM or Komar identification, observed object, or empirical validity is asserted.

Statement

Let m∗>0 be a selected SI mass parameter, choose σ∈{−1,+1}, and set m:=GNm∗c2,Qe:=σ4πε0GN m∗,ΦB:=0. Use α=4πGN/(μ0c4) and the parameter map of SI and geometric solution parameter identifications. On the single-center MP exterior D=R3∖{0} with H=1+m/∣x∣, the change of radial coordinate R=∣x∣+m identifies the SI metric and field F=α−1Fσ exactly with the electric RN data of Dyonic Reissner-Nordström metric and field domains on R>m, with M=m,qe=σm,qm=0,f(R)=(1−mR)2. Thus ∣qe∣=M and the two presentations describe the same source-free solution of the adopted zero-Λ equation-based model on that open exterior. The correspondence does not extend the coordinate map to R=m.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: m∗>0, positive SI constants, σ∈{−1,+1}, zero magnetic flux, and the exact MP and RN coordinate conventions.

[F1]

Positive harmonic conformastatic electrovac data: the single-center harmonic datum has H=1+m/ρ, g=−H−2(dx0)2+H2(dρ2+ρ2γS2), and Fσ=d(σ(H−1−1)dx0).

[F2]

SI and geometric solution parameter identifications: M=GNm∗/c2, qe=GN/(4πε0c4) Qe, qm=αΦB/(4π), and F=αF.

[F3]

Single-center MP is extremal Reissner-Nordström exterior: for H=1+m/ρ and R=ρ+m, the full MP metric and two-form equal RN data with M=m, qe=σm, qm=0, and f=(1−m/R)2 on R>m, with the positive x0 time direction and the orientation-preserving radial map of the mathematical supplier. This is a draft mathematical proposition with a complete current proof and Step 1 authoring-ready record; the coordinate identity is used conditionally.

[F4]

Harmonic static multicenter electrovac model: the single-center specialization satisfies the selected SI source-free equations on its punctured exterior. This current physical theorem is draft with a complete authored proof and Step 1 authoring-ready record, not independent proof approval.

[F5]

Dyonic RN as adopted Einstein–Maxwell model: the RN datum with these parameter values satisfies the same selected SI source-free equations wherever r>0 and f≠0. This current physical theorem is draft with a complete authored proof and Step 1 authoring-ready record, not independent proof approval.

[F6]

Dyonic Reissner-Nordström metric and field domains: the RN metric and two-form are g=−f(dx0)2+f−1dr2+r2γS2 and F=−qer−2dx0∧dr+qmωS2.

[F7]

Equation-based Einstein–Maxwell model: the equation-based model is adopted, not derived; the source-free conclusion specializes to Λ=0, j=0, and Tm=0.

[A1]

The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω): the inherited geometric and flux convention is at most ACω; the radial diffeomorphism and substitutions are choice-free.

Proof

Given: The hypotheses and exact current interfaces [F1]–[F7] and [A1].

1.1givenF2algebra

Substituting Qe and ΦB=0 into [F2] gives qe=σGNm∗/c2=σm and qm=0, while M=m>0. Thus ∣qe∣=M and f(R)=(1−m/R)2>0 for R>m.

2.1givenF1F2F3F6step 1.1constructalgebra

The radial map R=ρ+m is a smooth diffeomorphism (0,∞)→(m,∞) with inverse ρ=R−m. By [F1] the single-center candidate has H=1+m/ρ and the stated metric-field form. Apply [F3]: H−1=1−m/R and H2ρ2=R2, so the metric and two-form agree with [F6] on the full open exterior. Multiplication of both geometric two-forms by the same constant α−1 preserves their equality for the SI fields.

3.1givenF4F5F7A1step 2.1∎

By [F4] and [F5], the identical data on the two sides satisfy the same specialized physical equations from [F7]. This establishes a coordinate correspondence between exact model solutions only; no extension through the excluded surface or center follows.

Physics theoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passOpen item page →

Constant-radius charged product model

Physical scope

Conditional source-free SI model on either specified open Bertotti–Robinson product chart, with constant sphere radius L>0 and the specified smooth nonzero two-form. No maximal extension, asymptotic-flatness, source at a boundary, observation, or empirical realization is asserted.

Statement

Let L>0 be a length. Choose either the product chart with dimensionless coordinates τ,z, z∈J for a nonempty open J⊂(0,∞) and f(z)=z2, or the chart with z∈J for a nonempty open J⊂R and f(z)=1+z2. Take the metric and geometric field of Constant-radius Bertotti-Robinson product data: gL,f=L2(−f(z)dτ2+f(z)−1dz2+γS2),FL=−L dτ∧dz. For GN,c,μ0>0, set α=4πGN/(μ0c4) and FL=α−1FL. Under the adopted postulate Equation-based Einstein–Maxwell model with Λ=0, j=0, and Tm=0, the SI field FL and metric gL,f satisfy dFL=0,∇agFLab=0,Gab=κETabEM. The sphere factor has radius L at each base point. This is a deduction for the stated open charts only.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: L>0, one of the two open product domains and functions f, positive SI constants, the geometric product data, and the zero-source branch of the adopted postulate.

[F1]

Constant-radius Bertotti-Robinson product data: g=L2(−f dτ2+f−1dz2+γS2) and FL=−L dτ∧dz on the two stated open chart types.

[F2]

Product electrovacuum equations from full factor Ricci: for each such datum, dFL=d(⋆gFL)=0 and Ric⁡=2Q(FL); the full factor Ricci tensors are computed in its current proof. This mathematical theorem is draft with a complete proof and Step 1 authoring-ready record; its result is used conditionally, not as independent approval.

[F3]

Geometric electrovac data solve the selected SI equations: a source-free geometric electrovac datum scales by F=α−1F to solve the selected SI equation model. This local theorem is draft with its complete proof authored and is used conditionally, not as independent proof approval.

[F4]

SI and geometric solution parameter identifications: α2=4πGN/(μ0c4) and the geometric field has units m−1 while the SI two-form has units T in length coordinates.

[F5]

Equation-based Einstein–Maxwell model: the equation-based law is an adopted physical assumption; this item specializes it to Λ=0, j=0, and Tm=0.

[A1]

The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω): the inherited geometric background convention is ACω; this pointwise product calculation makes no choice.

Proof

Given: The exact domains, field, metric, and current supplier statements in [F1]–[F5] and [A1].

1.1givenF1F2

For either allowed f and domain, [F1] defines smooth product data with L>0. The current complete conditional verification [F2] proves the geometric Maxwell equations and Ric⁡=2Q(FL) there; the proof treats the two product factors and all mixed Ricci components.

2.1givenF3F4F5A1step 1.1∎

With constant α>0 and units as in [F4], apply [F3] to the geometric electrovac datum from step 1.1. It gives the SI field FL=α−1FL, the zero-divergence Maxwell equation, and Gab=κETabEM under the specialization of [F5]. No field equation or extension is asserted at a chart boundary, and this pointwise conversion adds no choice beyond [A1].

Physics theoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)Open item page →

Local SI model limit from extremal RN to Bertotti–Robinson

Physical scope

Exact local smooth scaling limit of the selected electric extremal RN exterior to the Poincaré product chart of the source-free Einstein–Maxwell model. Convergence is only on compact subsets of R>0; no extension through the limiting boundary, global limit, or empirical claim is included.

Statement

Fix L>0. Select m∗=c2LGN,Qe=+4πε0GN m∗,ΦB=0. The map of SI and geometric solution parameter identifications gives M=qe=L, qm=0, so the electric RN metric function is f(r)=(1−L/r)2 on r>L. For every dimensionless λ>0, on RT×(0,∞)R×S2 define Φλ(T,R,ω)=(x0=T/λ, r=L+λR, ω). Let gλ=Φλ∗g and Fλ=Φλ∗F for the SI extremal RN solution. Then gλ=−R2(L+λR)2dT2+(L+λR)2R2dR2+(L+λR)2γS2, and Fλ=α−1Fλ where Fλ=−L(L+λR)2dT∧dR. As λ↓0, (gλ,Fλ) converges in Cloc∞ on RT×(0,∞)R×S2 to g0=−R2L2dT2+L2R2dR2+L2γS2,F0=−1αLdT∧dR. Under T=Lτ and R=Lz, the limit is exactly the electric Bertotti–Robinson data of Constant-radius Bertotti-Robinson product data with f(z)=z2, z>0. By Constant-radius charged product model, it is a solution of the same adopted SI model. The convergence and solution statements are limited to the stated open domains and do not assert an extension at R=0.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: L>0, λ>0, the extremal SI parameter values, the exact RN and product definitions, and the adopted zero-source equation model.

[F1]

Extremal RN to Bertotti-Robinson in C-infinity local scaling: for M=qe=L, qm=0, the exact pullbacks and geometric fields converge smoothly on compact subsets of R>0 to the f=z2 Bertotti–Robinson product after T=Lτ, R=Lz. This mathematical theorem is draft with a complete current proof and Step 1 authoring-ready record; it is used conditionally.

[F2]

Dyonic RN as adopted Einstein–Maxwell model: the dyonic RN data with the parameter map of SI and geometric solution parameter identifications solve the adopted SI equations on the open domain where r>0 and f≠0. This physical theorem is draft with a complete current proof and Step 1 authoring-ready record; its solution claim is used conditionally.

[F3]

Constant-radius charged product model: the f=z2 product with L>0 solves the same source-free SI model on z>0. This physical theorem is draft with a complete proof authored in this batch and is used conditionally, without independent approval.

[F4]

SI and geometric solution parameter identifications: qe=GN/(4πε0c4) Qe, M=GNm∗/c2, ΦB=0 gives qm=0, and α is a positive constant.

[F5]

Equation-based Einstein–Maxwell model: the same adopted postulate is used with Λ=0, j=0, and Tm=0.

[A1]

The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω): the inherited geometric convention is at most ACω; the scaling map and compact convergence do not make a choice.

Proof

Given: The hypotheses and exact current statements in [F1]–[F5] and [A1].

1.1givenF2F4algebra

Substituting m∗ and Qe from the Statement into [F4] gives M=L, qe=L, and qm=0, with L>0. Hence f(r)=(1−L/r)2>0 for r>L, so the physical RN solution in [F2] applies throughout the image of each Φλ.

2.1givenF1F4step 1.1algebra

The exact geometric pullbacks in [F1] yield the displayed gλ and Fλ. Since Fλ=α−1Fλ with constant positive α, the same coordinate derivatives converge on each compact subset of R>0 after multiplication by α−1. This is the stated Cloc∞ convergence for the SI fields as well as the metrics.

3.1givenF3F5A1step 2.1algebra∎

The coordinate substitution T=Lτ, R=Lz transforms the limiting pair into gL,z2 and FL=α−1FL from [F3], on z>0. Thus the limit is itself a source-free SI model solution. The coordinate scaling uses no choice beyond [A1] and makes no claim about R=0.

Physics theoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passOpen item page →

Exact coupled electromagnetic null-wave model

Physical scope

Exact source-free classical SI Einstein–Maxwell solutions on the specified plane-fronted null-wave chart, for arbitrary smooth electromagnetic profiles and smooth transverse harmonic gravitational profile. No asymptotic flatness, finite total energy, observation, or empirical validity is asserted.

Statement

Use length coordinates (u,v,x,y) on R4. Let a,b:R→R be smooth profiles with units m−1, and let h:R3→R be smooth, dimensionless, and satisfy hxx+hyy=0. Set P(u,x,y)=−(a(u)2+b(u)2)(x2+y2)+h(u,x,y), g=−2 du dv+dx2+dy2+P du2,A=−(a(u)x+b(u)y) du, F=dA=a(u) du∧dx+b(u) du∧dy,F=α−1F, where α=4πGN/(μ0c4) from SI and geometric solution parameter identifications. Use the orientation du∧dv∧dx∧dy and future unit field N=∂u+(P+1)∂v/2, as in Smooth null electrovac wave candidate data. The metric has signature (−,+,+,+). Under the adopted postulate Equation-based Einstein–Maxwell model with no material stress or current and Λ=0, these data satisfy the source-free SI Einstein–Maxwell equations on all of R4. The claim is an exact model deduction; it asserts neither asymptotic flatness nor finite total wave energy.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The length-coordinate null-wave data, smoothness and harmonicity hypotheses, positive SI constants, and the source-free specialization of the adopted postulate.

[F1]

Smooth null electrovac wave candidate data: g=−2du dv+dx2+dy2+Pdu2, A=−(ax+by)du, and F=a du∧dx+b du∧dy, with arbitrary smooth profiles and hxx+hyy=0.

[F2]

Exact electrovac plane-wave family: the defined data satisfy dF=d(⋆gF)=0 and Ric⁡=2Q(F) for the full stated profile class. This mathematical theorem is draft with a complete current proof and Step 1 authoring-ready record; it is used conditionally.

[F3]

Geometric electrovac data solve the selected SI equations: constant rescaling by α−1 turns any source-free geometric electrovac datum into a solution of the selected SI model. This local theorem is draft with its complete proof authored and is used conditionally, not as independent proof approval.

[F4]

SI and geometric solution parameter identifications: α>0 is constant, F=αF, and the two-form components have units m−1 geometrically and T in the SI convention.

[F5]

Equation-based Einstein–Maxwell model: the equation-based model is an adopted physical assumption, specialized here to Λ=0, j=0, and Tm=0.

[A1]

The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω): the inherited geometry and Hodge convention carries ACω; the local field rescaling makes no choice.

Proof

Given: The exact smooth null-wave data and supplier statements in [F1]–[F5] and [A1].

1.1givenF1F2

The data in the Statement are exactly the definition in [F1], with smooth a,b,h and transverse Laplacian zero. The complete conditional verification [F2] therefore gives the geometric source-free Maxwell and Ricci equations on the whole coordinate domain R4.

2.1givenF3F4F5A1step 1.1∎

Apply the constant SI rescaling in [F3] to the datum of step 1.1. It yields F=α−1F with the units and positive normalization in [F4]. Under the source-free adopted branch [F5], the resulting metric and field satisfy the SI equations at every point of R4; the pointwise scaling makes no choice beyond [A1].

5 · Examples, experiments and counterexamples

None yet.

Sources