Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

✓ 1 result · all verified · 1 also independently AI-judged
Every result on this page is machine-checked by a proof checker and read in full and owner-audited; the judge is an additional, independent cross-model AI review of the proofs; all 1 also cleared it.

Analytic Derived Six Operations And Duality Examples

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

Objective. This companion page works the smallest oriented computation of the A page's duality theory. On the complex line C, regarded as a smooth complex 1-fold, the complex orientation computes the dualizing object ωC=kC[2] from the single positive generator of the compact-support cochains of a positively oriented disk. The closed inclusion i:{0}↪C then exposes the two closed-support shifts: the exceptional inverse image i!kC=k[−2] is computed both through the relative cohomology of the punctured disk and through the duality identity i!≃D{0}i∗DC, and applying i! to ωC=kC[2] gives k[−2][2]=k, consistently with dualizing transitivity. The example consumes the A page's AC-assumed Verdier supplier, while the displayed relative-cellular computation itself is choice-free.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

None yet.

5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

Dualizing and support shifts on the complex line

Example

With the conventions of Constructible Verdier duality and complex orientation and coefficient field k: on the complex line C (an oriented smooth complex 1-fold) the dualizing object is ωC=kC[2]. For the closed inclusion i:{0}↪C one has i!kC=k[−2] and i!ωC=k. The example consumes the AC-assumed Verdier supplier; the displayed computation itself is choice-free.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The complex line C with its analytic topology, the closed inclusion i:{0}↪C, a coefficient field k, and the conventions of Constructible Verdier duality and complex orientation and Derived operations on analytic field sheaves; AC is consumed through the Verdier supplier.

[F1]

The Verdier supplier: ωX=aX!k and DX=RHom(−,ωX); on a smooth complex d-fold the complex orientation gives ωX≃kX[2d]; f!≃DXf∗DY; and dualizing transitivity holds (Constructible Verdier duality and complex orientation).

[F2]

Closed-support localization and the exceptional adjoint: for a closed inclusion i:Z→X the object i! is the derived functor of i−1ΓZ, both localization triangles hold and RHom(i∗kZ,A)≅RΓZA (Support localization, base change, projection and trace calculus, Exceptional inverse image as the adjoint of derived proper-support image).

[F3]

Compactly supported global sections and their derived functors Hcq are defined for locally compact Hausdorff spaces (Compactly supported global sections and their right derived functors).

Verification

1.1givenF1F3

A positively complex-oriented open disk U⊂C, with closed-disk compactification D=U‾, has compact-support cochain complex with a single cohomology generator in degree 2 over k: the closed disk with its boundary is the finite relative cellular model (D,∂D) whose quotient is generated by the oriented 2-cell, which computes compact supports on U by extension by zero to D. Hence the dual local model has k concentrated in degree −2, and the orientation normalization of [F1] at d=1 gives ωC=kC[2]. This uses the same positive complex orientation generator as the diagonal Thom calculations.

2.1givenF1F2F4step 1.1∎

Closed-support cohomology at the origin. By [F2] the object i!kC is RΓ{0}(C,kC), the derived functor of i−1Γ{0}, and the localization triangle of [F2] computes it as the relative cohomology of the pair (U,U∖{0}) for a small open disk U around the origin; radial retraction of the punctured disk to the circle gives the relative cellular model with a single generator in degree 2, so i!kC=k[−2]. Applying the shift [2] of [F4] gives i!ωC=i!(kC[2])=k[−2][2]=k, consistently with dualizing transitivity of [F1]. The duality route produces the same answer: DCkC=kC[2], i∗(kC[2])=k[2] and D{0}(k[2])=k[−2], with the same positive orientation generator used in both computations. The displayed computation involves only the finite relative cellular model of a disk and is choice-free; AC is present only because the consumed Verdier supplier assumes it.

Sources