Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Nonaffine Algebraic Groups, Barsotti-Chevalley, and Abelian Varieties — Examples

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

These examples display the two basic nonaffine algebraic groups of the page. The split extension A×kGm of an abelian variety by the multiplicative group is computed on every test scheme: its kernel and fppf quotient are the displayed factors, and the closed copy of A is nonaffine as soon as dim⁡A>0, over an arbitrary field. The Weierstrass cubic Y2Z=4X3−g2XZ2−g3Z3 attached to a full complex lattice is exhibited as an abelian variety in dimension one: nonsingularity and properness come from the projective cubic, the chord-tangent formulas are holomorphic on the torus and extend algebraically by the local Taylor/completion bridge of the page, and the group identities are checked on the dense complex points. Explicit regularity of the algebraic law is established rather than imported from the analytic uniformisation.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

None yet.

5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

A split affine extension of an abelian variety

Example

Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let A be an abelian variety over k, and let G=A×kGm, where Gm=Spec⁡k[t,t−1] with multiplication of invertible coordinates. Coordinatewise multiplication gives a split extension 1⟶Gm⟶G→qA⟶1. The kernel is an affine smooth connected normal subgroup scheme, and A represents the fppf quotient sheaf G/Gm. If dim⁡A>0, then G is nonaffine. This example works over an arbitrary field; it does not assume the perfect-field uniqueness theorem.

Verification

Given: AC, an abelian variety A/k, and the product G=A×kGm.

[F1] An abelian variety is a group variety. (Abelian varieties over a field)

[F2] Under AC a proper geometrically integral affine scheme is a point. In particular an abelian variety of positive dimension is nonaffine. (A proper geometrically integral affine scheme is a point)

[F3] Fibre products of schemes exist, and a closed subscheme of an affine scheme is affine. (Existence of all scheme fibre products, Closed immersions into affine schemes are quotient spectra)

[F4] Represented scheme functors are sheaves for the fppf topology. (Scheme morphisms satisfy fppf descent)

1.1F1F3givenalgebra

The group laws on A and Gm give the group laws on their product. The latter group's affine Hopf formulas are t↦t⊗t, t↦t−1, and t↦1, so the group laws are regular. The projection q(a,t)=a is a homomorphism, split by a↦(a,1), and its scheme-theoretic kernel is {eA}×Gm. It is normal because conjugation in the product preserves this factor. It is affine by its displayed spectrum, smooth because it is an open subscheme of the affine line, and geometrically connected because K[t,t−1] is a domain for every field extension K/k.

2.1F4step 1.1construct

For every k-scheme T, q:G(T)=A(T)×Γ(T,OT)×→A(T) is onto, and two elements have the same image exactly when they differ by the action of a unique Gm(T) element. Thus the presheaf quotient is already the represented functor A(−), naturally in T; by [F4], its fppf sheafification is the same represented functor. This proves the asserted scheme quotient.

3.1F2F3step 1.1step 2.1∎

The section A×{1}⊂G is closed since {1}⊂Spec⁡k[t,t−1] is defined by t−1. If G were affine, [F3] would make that copy of A affine. For dim⁡A>0 this contradicts [F2]. Hence G is a nonaffine algebraic group in that case. AC is carried through [F2].

ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

A smooth Weierstrass elliptic cubic is a nonaffine algebraic group

Example

Assume the Axiom of Choice. For a full complex lattice Λ, let g2,g3 be its Weierstrass invariants. The projective plane cubic E:Y2Z=4X3−g2XZ2−g3Z3, with identity O=[0:1:0] and the chord-tangent group law, is an abelian variety over C and is not affine. Thus proper nonaffine algebraic groups already occur in dimension one.

Verification

Given: AC, Λ, its invariants g2,g3, E, and O.

[F1] The Weierstrass discriminant is nonzero, the displayed cubic is nonsingular, and Φ:C/Λ→E(C) is a biholomorphism. Transported addition is the chord-tangent law. (Nonvanishing of the lattice discriminant, The torus is biholomorphic to its Weierstrass cubic, The chord-tangent group law and elliptic uniformization)

[F2] An everywhere holomorphic extension of a rational map from a product of smooth complex curves is algebraic. (A holomorphic extension of a rational map on a product of smooth complex curves is algebraic)

[F3] Projective space is proper, and the Jacobian criterion gives smoothness of the cubic scheme from nonsingularity. (Finite-dimensional projective space is proper over every base, Relative Jacobian criterion with its presentation hypothesis)

[F4] An abelian variety is a proper smooth geometrically connected algebraic group; a positive-dimensional abelian variety cannot be affine. (Abelian varieties over a field, A proper geometrically integral affine scheme is a point)

1.1F1F3givenalgebra

By [F1] and [F3], E is a smooth projective one-dimensional scheme over C, hence proper: a closed subscheme of proper projective space is finite type and separated, and its projection remains closed after arbitrary base change. Its complex manifold is connected by the biholomorphism with the connected torus. The irreducible components of a smooth algebraic scheme cannot meet, since its regular local rings are domains; the finitely many components are therefore both algebraically and analytically open and closed. Connectedness leaves exactly one, so E is integral and, over the algebraically closed field C, geometrically integral.

2.1F1F2step 1.1algebra

Transported addition on E(C) is jointly holomorphic: around any two points lift to torus coordinates z,w, use the holomorphic map (z,w)↦z+w, and compose with the biholomorphism Φ and its inverse from [F1]. On the dense algebraic open where P=(x1,y1) and Q=(x2,y2) are affine and x1≠x2, set m=(y2−y1)/(x2−x1). The chord meets the cubic at a third point with x-coordinate m2/4−x1−x2, by comparison of the cubic's quadratic coefficient. Negating its y-coordinate gives the rational formulas x(P+Q)=m2/4−x1−x2 and y(P+Q)=−y1+m(x1−x(P+Q)). They agree with the holomorphic group law by [F1]. Apply [F2] to get a regular algebraic multiplication E×E→E. Inverse is the regular projective map [X:Y:Z]↦[X:−Y:Z], and the identity is the rational point O.

3.1F1F3F4step 1.1step 2.1algebra∎

Associativity, inverse, and identity hold on every complex point by transport from the torus. They hold as scheme morphism identities: the relevant product schemes are reduced, their complex closed points are Zariski dense, and equality is a closed condition because the target is separated. Consequently E is a group variety, and properness and geometric connectedness from step 1.1 make it an abelian variety by [F4]. Since dim⁡E=1, the nonaffineness criterion in [F4] proves that E is not affine. This verification explicitly establishes regularity of the algebraic law; analytic uniformization alone was not treated as that supplier. AC is carried through [F2]–[F4].

Sources