How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Lawrence–Krammer–Bigelow Representations and Linearity
1 · Prerequisites
- Abelian Categories
- Absolute and Conditional Convergence; Rearrangement; Products
- Applications of the Fundamental Group
- Approximation and Compactness in C(K)
- Asymptotic Cones and the Sublinear Triangle Criterion
- Binary Operations, Monoids, Groups and Subgroups
- Braided and Symmetric Monoidal Categories
- Braids as Fundamental Groups of Configuration Spaces
- Cardinal Arithmetic, Cofinality and the Alephs
- Categories, Functors and Natural Transformations
- Cayley Graphs, Word Metrics and Quasi-Isometry
- Chain Complexes and Homology
- Chain Homotopy and the Homotopy Category
- Classification of Compact Connected Surfaces
- Classification of Covering Spaces
- Compactness
- Compactness in Metric Spaces
- Completeness, Completion, and Uniform Continuity
- Connectedness
- Construction of the Natural Numbers
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Cauchy Sequences
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Dedekind Cuts
- Continuity, IVT, EVT, and Uniform Continuity
- Cosets, Index and Lagrange's Theorem
- Countability and Uncountability
- Countability Axioms and Cardinal Functions
- Covering Spaces and Lifting
- Cup Cap Cross Products and Cohomology Rings
- Cw Complexes and Cellular Homology
- Derived Functors
- Determinants of Matrices over a Commutative Ring
- Divisibility, Euclidean Domains, Principal Ideal Domains and Unique Factorisation
- Dual Spaces, Bilinear and Quadratic Forms, and Sylvester's Law of Inertia
- Euclidean Ordinary Differential Equations with Smooth Dependence
- Exactness and the Member Calculus
- Ext and Balanced Resolutions
- Fibrations Fiber Bundles and Homotopy Exact Sequences
- Filters and Ultrafilters
- Finite Counting, Factorials and Binomial Coefficients
- Foundations of the Real Numbers for Analysis
- Free Groups and Presentations
- Free Modules, Exact Sequences, Projective and Injective Modules
- Free Products and Amalgamation
- Fubini and Change of Variables
- Function Space Topologies and the Exponential Law
- Garside Structure, Normal Forms, and the Center
- Geometric Braids and Artin Generators
- Graphs, Walks and Connectivity
- Group Actions, Orbits, Stabilisers and Cayley's Theorem
- Group Homomorphisms and the Isomorphism Theorems
- Hausdorff via the Diagonal
- Hereditary and Productive Behaviour of the Separation Axioms
- Higher Homotopy Groups and Cofiber Sequences
- Homology Axioms Degree and Classical Applications
- Homotopy and Homotopy Equivalence
- Hurewicz Whitehead Freudenthal and Cw Approximation
- Ideals, Quotient Rings and the Isomorphism Theorems for Rings
- Kunneth Exactness and Splittings over Principal Ideal Domains
- Limits and Colimits
- Limits of Real Functions
- limsup, liminf, and Subsequential Limits
- Linear Independence, Bases and Dimension
- Linear Transformations, Rank-Nullity and Quotient Spaces
- Long Exact Sequences in Homology
- Manifolds with Boundary Collars and Orientations
- Matrices, the Matrix of a Linear Map, and Change of Basis
- Metric Spaces
- Mixed Partials, Taylor Formulae, and Extrema
- Modules, Submodules, Quotient Modules and the Isomorphism Theorems
- Monotone Functions, Discontinuities, and Continuity Sets
- Monotone Sequences, Bolzano-Weierstrass, and Cauchy Completeness
- Normal Subgroups and Quotient Groups
- Normed and Banach Spaces
- Order, Zorn's Lemma, and the Axiom of Choice
- Ordered and Unordered Configuration Spaces
- Ordinal Arithmetic and the First Uncountable Ordinal
- Ordinals, Cardinals, and Transfinite Recursion
- Orientations Poincare Lefschetz and Alexander Duality
- Partitions of Unity and Paracompactness
- Permutation Statistics, Inversions and Eulerian Numbers
- Picard-Lindelöf and First-Order Ordinary Differential Equations
- Plane Graphs, Euler's Formula and the Five Colour Theorem
- Polynomial Rings, the Division Algorithm and Roots
- Power Series and Real-Analytic Functions
- Preadditive and Additive Categories and Biproducts
- Projective and Injective Resolutions
- Properties of the Integral and the Working FTC
- Punctured Disks, Mapping Classes, and Point Pushing
- Rank Theorems and Embedded Submanifolds
- Reflective Subcategories and the Adjoint Functor Theorems
- Relations, Functions, and Quotients
- Relative Homology Excision and Mayer Vietoris
- Rings, Subrings, Integral Domains and Fields
- Rⁿ as a Normed Space; Vector-Valued Functions
- Roots, Rational Powers, and Classical Inequalities
- Separation Axioms: the Hierarchy
- Sequences and Limits
- Sequences and Series of Functions; Uniform Convergence
- Series: Convergence and the Nonnegative Tests
- Simple Field Extensions and the Construction of the Complex Numbers
- Simplicial Complexes and Simplicial Homology
- Simplicial Subdivision and Simplicial Approximation
- Simply Connected Plane Domains: the Grand Equivalence
- Singular Chains and Singular Homology
- Singular Cohomology and Coefficient Theorems
- Smooth Manifolds and Smooth Maps
- Smooth Partitions of Unity and Exhaustions
- Smooth Vector Bundles and Sections
- Subobject Lattices Generators and the Grothendieck Axioms
- Subspaces, Products, and Quotients
- Suprema and Infima
- Symmetric Groups, Cycle Decomposition and the Sign Homomorphism
- Tangent Cotangent and the Differential
- Tensor Products of Modules
- The Artin Action on a Free Group
- The Ascoli–Arzelà Theorem
- The Cantor Set, Baire Category, and Measure Zero in ℝ
- The Complex Exponential and Euler's Formula
- The Derivative and the Mean Value Theorems
- The Determinant of a Linear Operator, Cofactors and Cramer's Rule
- The Diagram Lemmas in an Abelian Category
- The Exponential Function
- The Field of Fractions and Localisation
- The Fundamental Group
- The Fundamental Group of the Circle
- The Fundamental Theorems of Calculus
- The Inverse and Implicit Function Theorems
- The Inverse Function Theorem Completed
- The Riemann Integral in Rᵐ and Jordan Content
- The Riemann Integral: Definition and Integrability
- The Seifert–van Kampen Theorem
- The Topology of Euclidean Space
- The Total Derivative in ℝᵐ → ℝⁿ
- The ZFC Axioms and the Basic Set Constructions
- Topological Spaces and Continuity
- Topology of ℝ
- Trees, Forests and Spanning Trees
- Universal Coefficients and Kunneth Theorems
- Universal Properties, Representables and the Yoneda Lemma
- Urysohn's Lemma and the Tietze Extension Theorem
- Vector Fields Flows and Lie Derivatives
- Vector Spaces, Linear Subspaces, Span and Direct Sums
2 · Summary
This page builds the Lawrence–Krammer–Bigelow (LKB) representation of the classical braid group and proves that it is faithful, so that every braid group is linear. The construction starts from the unordered two-point configuration space of the -times punctured disk. Its fundamental group maps onto the two-strand braid factor, and the two-variable covering homomorphism records both the total winding of the two mobile points around the punctures and their mutual half-twist exponent; its kernel classifies the regular cover , whose deck group is . Its absolute homology is the integral LKB module over . The relative collision-and-puncture end neighbourhoods are stabilized to direct limits and used only as targets of the intersection pairing; the representation itself lives on the absolute module.
The proof of integrality runs through the intersection pairing of noodles and forks. A closed compact replacement makes the pairing finite and well defined; the lexicographic order on deck monomials turns a minimal-position intersection pattern into a nonzero extremal coefficient, so the pairing detects exactly when a tine can be isotoped off a noodle. The closed surfaces have nonzero closing factors multiplying the end-relative squares and triangles . The primed pairings of with the boundary-relative dual classes form a triangular matrix with Laurent-unit diagonal; the absolute pairings include the closing factors and need not be units. The denominator-elimination argument shows that fraction-field coefficients of integral classes are Laurent polynomials. It follows that is free of rank , with the closed surfaces as an integral basis; for this integral lattice is only fraction-field isomorphic to Krammer's matrix model, and no integral identification of the two bases is asserted.
The normalized lifts of boundary-fixed homeomorphisms act on the integral module by -linear automorphisms, defining after the classical braid group is identified with the boundary-fixed mapping class group of the punctured disk. Faithfulness is Bigelow's topological closure: a braid in the kernel can be isotoped so that every standard adjacent edge is fixed up to isotopy. A label-preserving mapping class fixing these edges is a power of the full twist, as proved by fixing the spine pointwise and completing its slit complement to a compact annulus. The full twist acts by the scalar , whose powers act trivially only for the zeroth power when ; for the braid group is trivial. Hence the kernel is trivial, and embeds into and hence into . The companion examples page computes a fork–noodle pairing, exhibits the Krammer matrices in the fraction-field model, and separates mere linear representability from faithfulness.
3 · Logical flowchart
4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs
The two-point configuration space of a punctured disk
Definition
Let let , and let be a set of distinct points, called punctures. Throughout the Lawrence-Krammer-Bigelow page the punctures are normally taken on the real axis with , as the standard configuration.
The two-point configuration space of the punctured disk is the unordered configuration space of Unordered configuration spaces . Its elements are written for the orbit of the ordered pair . The basepoint is where are two distinct points of the lower arc of , specified once and for all together with the standard configuration and with the following convention: lies to the left of and the arc of from to passing through is the lower arc used in every noodle construction on this page. Thus is a genuine basepoint.
Action of the boundary-fixed mapping class group. Let be the boundary-fixed mapping class group of Boundary-fixed mapping class group of a punctured disk: isotopy classes relative to of homeomorphisms with and . Every such homeomorphism sends to itself, commutes with the interchange , and therefore induces a homeomorphism of . Since fixes pointwise, it fixes and and hence fixes . These representative homeomorphisms act literally on . An isotopy relative to the outer boundary and the marked set gives the continuous based homotopy , fixing throughout. Thus mapping classes act on based homotopy classes of self-maps, and induce well-defined actions on and homology; no literal action of a mapping class on the individual points of is asserted.
Elementary properties. is path-connected and locally path-connected. Indeed, has disk neighborhoods at interior points and relative half-disk neighborhoods at boundary points; choose them small enough to miss . It is not an open subset of the plane. Polygonal paths with finite puncture detours give path connectivity. To join two ordered configurations, choose two distinct interior buffer points different from the four prescribed mobile positions and . Move the first point to its buffer avoiding the stationary second point, then the second to its buffer avoiding the first; move the first to its target and finally the second to its target, with the same finite-point detours. The distinct buffer choices prevent an occupied target during each stage. Passing to unordered pairs gives path connectivity. Local path-connectedness is inherited from through the two-to-one quotient map : a small product neighbourhood of maps onto a neighbourhood of , and the only non-injectivity is the interchange of the two coordinates. These conventions fix the space, basepoint and action used by the covering homomorphism and the LKB pairing below.
Minimal-position representatives and the arc bigon criterion
Statement
Assume AC. Let be the closed unit disk, finite, and a finite family of pairwise disjoint simple arcs in with endpoints on and interiors in . Let be a simple arc in with endpoints in and interior in . Intersections with are counted in arc interiors; disjointness from permits shared fixed boundary endpoints and excludes every other intersection. Then:
(i) is isotopic relative to its endpoints, through such arcs, to an arc meeting every member of transversally with minimal total number of intersections;
(ii) is isotopic relative to its endpoints to an arc disjoint from every member of if and only if some (equivalently every) minimal-position representative is disjoint from ;
(iii) if this holds and is a finite union of pairwise disjoint simple proper arcs (with the endpoint convention below) disjoint from and from every member of , then the disjoining isotopy can be chosen with its moving part disjoint from .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: , the finite puncture set , the finite family of disjoint arcs with endpoints on , and the arc with endpoints in . An "arc" of this page is proper: its endpoints lie in , so no component of a family of arcs is a closed loop.
Jordan–Schönflies extension for plane curves supplies prescribed Jordan-disk boundary extensions under AC.
Homotopic simple proper arcs in the punctured disk are isotopic relative to their endpoints supplies the relative graph/face smoothing construction (proof 1.1–3.1), the compact terminal-strip normalization and actual universal-cover bigon projection (proof 4.1–5.1), and supported ambient disk and endpoint-sector pushes (proof 6.1). These constructions use AC and are independent of this item. Their cover projection uses Brouwer fixed point theorem, and the supported moves use Alexander contraction of the boundary-fixed disk homeomorphism group.
Proof
Interpret transverse intersections and their number in the interiors; common fixed boundary endpoints are retained and not counted. The graph/face construction of [F2] puts the disjoint family in polygonal coordinates: its union with the outer circle divides the disk into finitely many Jordan faces, prescribe the boundary and crosscut maps, and extend over the faces by [F1], correcting the finitely many marked points in their own faces. This is a fixed change of coordinates, not a moving family. In those coordinates apply [F2]'s relative smooth-representative construction to , keeping and the outer boundary fixed. Its finite normal strips permit polygonal interpolation; finitely many small vertex perturbations give finitely many transverse interior intersections with the fixed polygonal crosscuts. At a common boundary endpoint separate the two germs by the supported half-disk shear and straighten them as in [F2]; their endpoint remains fixed. These are ambient isotopies of , not simultaneous motions of the reference crosscuts. Thus the set of finite attainable total intersection counts is a nonempty subset of , and its least member is attained. This proves (i). If a disjoint representative exists the least count is zero, and every least-count representative has that count; conversely a zero-count representative supplies the required disjointness under the stated shared-boundary-endpoint convention. This proves (ii), with common endpoints treated consistently.
We record the additional extraction needed for avoidance and for the consumers: if can individually be isotoped off each of a disjoint family of crosscuts and meets that family, there is a clean puncture-free bigon reducing its total count. For a crosscut met by , take the supplied relative-endpoint isotopy to a representative disjoint from . Compact-square continuity permits terminal strips missing when the endpoints differ; if there is a common boundary endpoint use the normalized half-disk sector construction of [F2]. Perturb the compact remainder piecewise transversely. The inverse image of consists of finitely many arcs and possibly circles. Circles need not be removed and contribute no boundary endpoints. When the endpoint sets are disjoint, the terminal strips miss . If the initial and final counts are , and count components with respectively two initial, two final, and one of each boundary endpoint, then and . For a shared fixed boundary endpoint, [F2] normalizes the terminal half-disk angles and makes their encounters with the fixed crosscut germ occur at finitely many parameter times. Ignore the constant endpoint edge itself in the inverse image; incident components can then have one end at such a time and one on an initial or final side. Let count these two kinds. The correct counts are and ; components with both ends on endpoint edges and closed components contribute neither. In the disjoining case , so either or . In the first case a returning component gives a nullhomotopic loop consisting of a subpath and an subpath. In the second it gives a parameter sector with one fixed boundary endpoint: its two sides map along and and its endpoint edge maps constantly to that actual boundary point. The normalized half-disk sector construction of [F2] therefore applies. No half-bigon between two distinct fixed boundary points is used.
Lift that loop to the simply connected cover of the punctured disk. This is the cut-disk tree cover used in [F2]; compact pieces lie in a finite subtree enlarged by the corner stars and bounded puncture-collar rectangles, hence in a disk chart where Jordan separation applies. The lifts of the proper arcs are locally finite, and there are finitely many transverse crossings in that compact region. The returning pair of lifted subpaths contains a lifted bigon: erase repeated traversal segments and choose the first return bounding a disk between the two embedded lifted lines; an outermost entering segment gives a smaller such disk. Reduce across ALL lifts of and ALL crosscuts until none enters its interior. A different crosscut cannot cross the crosscut side, so any entering component has both contacts on the side and cuts off a smaller bigon; a lifted component similarly returns to the other side. The same finite reduction handles further lifts of . Boundary projection is injective: an identified point of different sides gives another transverse lifted crossing on a side, one branch entering the disk, contrary to the reduction. Same-side identifications are excluded by embeddedness. Consequently distinct deck translates of the boundary are disjoint. If their disk interiors overlap, Jordan nesting gives a deck map or its inverse carrying the compact disk into itself, contrary to Brouwer and the fixed-point-free deck action. Thus the entire disk projects injectively to an ordinary compact disk missing . At a common boundary endpoint the same argument is in a half-disk chart with that endpoint an actual covering point; no ideal puncture tip is used. This is the projection justification, rather than an inference that a face of a null-homotopy domain embeds in the surface.
A clean bigon push is supported in a slightly enlarged disk, not literally only in the original closed bigon. Its moving crosscut is prescribed to pass to a small pushoff of the opposite side, fixing the support boundary; [F1] extends the prescriptions over both Jordan faces, and [F2]'s Alexander move realizes them. At a boundary corner use a half-disk and fix its boundary edge. Choose the enlargement so it misses all other crosscuts and all punctures. Two interior crossings disappear (one for a fixed endpoint sector), and no new crossing appears. Starting with an arc individually disjoinable from each crosscut, these ambient isotopies preserve each such individual isotopy class. Step 2.1 therefore gives another clean bigon whenever any intersections remain. Strict decrease of the finite total count terminates with simultaneous disjointness. This proves the additional individual-to-simultaneous disjoining assertion used by the kernel argument.
For (iii), each component of is proper by the original Given convention. A clean bigon from step 3.1 cannot meet : a component meeting its interior cannot cross either boundary side, since is disjoint from both and the crosscuts; it cannot remain wholly inside, since its endpoints are on , whereas the ordinary bigon interior contains no such point. In an endpoint-sector disk its only boundary endpoint is on , hence is also excluded by . Compactness then allows the enlarged support of step 4.1 to miss . After each push remains disjoint from , so the same argument applies at the next stage. The finite composite disjoins while its moving part avoids , proving (iii). AC is used in the general planar graph/face and smoothing constructions; the proper-end convention is essential here. A floating unmarked interior-ended obstacle could lie wholly inside a bigon and would not satisfy that convention.
Equivariant stabilization of the LKB end neighbourhoods
Statement
Let be the closed unit disk, a nonempty finite set, and the unordered configurations of two distinct points of . Put Let mean the configurations with at least one point on . There is such that for the identity inclusions of pairs are homotopy equivalences of pairs. Their lifts to any fixed regular covering of are deck-equivariant homotopy equivalences of pairs, after fixing a basepoint lift outside .
Consequently their induced relative-homology maps and are isomorphisms in every degree. The maps toward zero are canonically They compose compatibly for decreasing radii, and their direct limits are canonically isomorphic to every sufficiently small relative group. This specifies the reversed transitions needed for a direct-limit convention at the collision and puncture ends; the original natural relative maps themselves run from small to large radii.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: , the finite puncture set , the configuration space , and a fixed regular covering with a specified basepoint lift when the covering conclusion is used.
Proof
Work first in the ordered configuration space, a subset of . Denote its finitely many distance functions by and . Their minimum is positive and locally Lipschitz. Choose so small that is less than the minimum distance between distinct punctures, , and ; omit the first bound if there is only one puncture. A prescribed base configuration can additionally be kept outside by decreasing . Such a choice uses only minima of finite positive lists.
At a point with , draw the graph whose vertices are the two mobile points and the fixed punctures and whose edges are precisely the distances equal to . No component contains two punctures: a path between them would use at most the two mobile vertices, hence have length at most , contradicting step 1.1. In a component containing a puncture , set the velocity of each mobile vertex to and leave the puncture fixed. Every active distance in this component has positive derivative equal to that distance, since the whole component is dilated about . All moved vertices are within of , so these velocities can be used in a neighbourhood disjoint from the disk boundary. Two disjoint puncture components use their respective dilations simultaneously. Isolated mobile vertices have zero velocity.
The remaining possible active component consists of the two mobile vertices without a puncture. Put , , and , using real coordinates in . This vector field is tangent to each disk boundary factor, and the derivative of is . Each summand is nonnegative on the disk and is positive if that point is interior. If both points are on the boundary, equality would require parallel to both boundary normals; distinct such points are antipodal, with distance , excluded by . Thus this candidate also increases every active distance. The cases in steps 2.1 and 3.1 exhaust the graph possibilities, including ties between a collision and a puncture distance and two separate puncture distances.
Fix . The band is compact and avoids all punctures and collisions. Each candidate of steps 2.1 and 3.1 is smooth near the point at which it was selected and strictly increases every active distance there. By continuity, the same holds in a neighbourhood: distances inactive at that point have a positive gap from the minimum, so none can become active on a sufficiently small neighbourhood unless its derivative was already positive. Cover by finitely many such neighbourhoods. For the puncture candidates restrict these neighbourhoods so that every moved coordinate is interior; for the collision candidate tangency holds identically. Take Lipschitz weights subordinate to this finite cover by the distance-to-complement construction, shrinking supports using the maximum-distance threshold as necessary, and normalize their sum. Their weighted sum is locally Lipschitz, tangent to every boundary factor, and strictly increases every active distance. Average it with its coordinate-interchanged translate to make it invariant under mobile interchange; positivity and tangency survive the averaging. Extend it to a neighbourhood of with a Lipschitz cutoff equal to one on the smaller band used by the trajectories. All these operations concern a finite compact band.
Write for this field. The set of pairs with and is compact. The continuous quantities are positive on it, so have a positive common lower bound . Along the flow of , the derivative of the minimum, at every time at which it is differentiable, is the derivative of one of its active distances and is at most . This also follows directly from the one-sided derivative of a finite minimum. The minimum is Lipschitz along the flow and hence its integrated decrease is at least per unit time while the trajectory stays in . The field preserves each disk boundary factor: on a boundary factor it is tangent, and uniqueness of solutions prevents an interior trajectory from crossing that factor. Thus these trajectories are valid configurations and preserve .
The required flow needs no additional existence assumption. On a compact neighbourhood with Lipschitz constant and bound , the operator is a contraction on the closed sup-norm ball of paths for time with and smaller than its radius. Starting with the constant path, its iterates have geometrically bounded consecutive differences, so converge uniformly to the unique integral solution. The same estimates give continuous dependence on the initial point. Repeat on finitely many compact-band time intervals as needed; a solution cannot cease to exist while staying in the band. This proves the local flow and the extension needed here. For an initial configuration with , step 5.1 shows that the first hitting time of is finite, bounded by , and continuous in ; the strict decrease and continuous dependence give the last assertion by bracketing the hitting time on either side. Set at .
Choose a Lipschitz function equal to one for and zero for . For flow for time , , and fix configurations with or . The bounded hitting times ensure continuity at the cutoff. This gives an interchange-invariant homotopy from the identity to . It never increases where it moves a point, preserves , and sends into . It preserves throughout as well. Therefore is a map of pairs in the reverse direction of each identity inclusion in the statement, and gives the two inverse homotopies, as homotopies of the respective pairs. For the boundary-union pairs, a boundary point with larger remains a boundary point; no cutoff across is being used on that boundary.
The homotopy fixes the chosen base configuration. Lift it starting at the identity of the covering; uniqueness of homotopy lifting in evenly covered neighbourhoods implies that the lift commutes with every deck transformation. Each lifted map preserves the preimages of the end neighbourhoods and the boundary exactly when its base map does. Thus step 7.1 proves deck-equivariant homotopy equivalences of both lifted pairs. It follows directly on singular relative chains, using the prism homotopy, that the induced maps are isomorphisms.
For the natural inclusions satisfy , so their unique inverses satisfy , and likewise for the boundary-union groups. The inverse is independent of every vector-field or cutoff choice because it is the inverse of a specified canonical homomorphism. The direct limit over decreasing sufficiently small radii therefore has compatible canonical isomorphisms from every one of these groups, and its universal property identifies it with any of them. The same conclusion holds after passage to a smaller cofinal interval of radii. This establishes both the stabilization and the directed convention claimed.
An equivariant two-dimensional model for the LKB configuration space
Statement
Let be real numbers, , and put Coordinate interchange admits an equivariant homotopy equivalence from to a finite two-dimensional CW complex. Its quotient is a model of the unordered configuration space .
After collapsing contractible cellular subcomplexes, the quotient has one vertex, edges (), (), and faces (), (, ), with attaching words The homotopy equivalence lifts to any corresponding regular cover, commutes with its deck group, and preserves ordinary absolute homology. The same model applies to a closed punctured disk containing the punctures in its interior, up to homotopy equivalence preserving the winding character. No identification with end-relative homology is asserted.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: , real punctures , the space , and coordinate interchange .
Unordered configuration spaces identifies the quotient of ordered distinct pairs with the unordered two-point configuration space.
Proof
Regard with . Let be the real lines , , and . For a line with affine equation and linear part , its complexification contains exactly when . Thus membership in is a condition on the lines containing the real part and the directions of the imaginary part. Choose a square containing all real arrangement vertices, and a strictly increasing continuous function fixing an interval containing every . For example, keep on after taking large enough, and on each tail use the increasing exponential interpolation to the endpoint . Applying to both real coordinates and leaving imaginary coordinates unchanged preserves every equality and the equality/order of . It therefore gives an equivariant homotopy equivalence between and its subspace with real part in ; the same homotopy restricts to that subspace.
Here is the finite good-cover argument needed for this particular cover. For a finite open cover of a metric space , let , using the constant function if the complement is empty, and put . Normalize the nonnegative functions to get a partition . Its support is locally contained in , since a point in the closure of its nonzero set satisfies . Form its thick nerve by gluing for all nonempty intersections , using the face inclusions. Projection to has the continuous section ; local containment of supports justifies continuity in this gluing topology. Straight interpolation in the simplex coordinates contracts its fibres onto this section, because the union of the two supports still consists of sets containing . Projection to the ordinary nerve is also a homotopy equivalence when all are contractible. To see this, filter by simplex dimension: each step attaches the products along , and projection on both products is a homotopy equivalence. The boundary product is a cofibration: a collar of the boundary of the finite simplex supplies its homotopy extension explicitly, after taking a product with . Consequently the pushout comparison preserves a homotopy equivalence. Indeed replace an attachment by its double mapping cylinder, extend the collar across it, and use the contractions of the factors on the two ends; the resulting homotopies descend to the pushout. Induction over the finitely many simplices proves the assertion. This proof uses finite choices only.
Cellulate the closed square by the arrangement lines and its boundary, and barycentrically subdivide this finite convex polyhedral cellulation. Choose a point in the relative interior of each face , respecting coordinate interchange; actual barycentres do this. An interior face means one not contained in the artificial square boundary, and corresponds to exactly one real arrangement facet. For each interior , let be its open vertex star in this subdivision, intersected with . These stars cover : a point in the relative interior of a face has a positive weight at an interior face vertex in its barycentric simplex. A nonempty intersection occurs exactly when the form a strict inclusion chain. It contracts to the centroid of their vertices by interpolating barycentric weights to those of that centroid; all their weights stay positive, and the centroid lies in . In particular . A real point in belongs to a cofacet of , so every arrangement line containing that point contains .
For every , partition imaginary space by the linear hyperplanes parallel to the arrangement lines containing . Let be an open chamber of this local arrangement; for a two-dimensional there are no such lines and the chamber is all of . Put . Step 2.1 and the membership criterion of step 1.1 show that this is an open subset of with real part in . These finitely many sets cover that space: at a real point in facet , use a star whose positive top face is and the local chamber containing its imaginary part. Intersections have contractible real factor by step 2.1 and convex imaginary factor, the intersection of finitely many strict linear half-spaces. A nonempty intersection is therefore contractible, and its indices form a face chain of length at most three. Coordinate interchange permutes the cover and its intersections.
Apply step 1.2 to step 3.1. The nerve has dimension at most two. Its barycentric simplices are exactly chains of facets with compatible local chamber labels. Every local chamber at a vertex is a sector between two or three incident lines; at an edge it is one of the two sides; at a real chamber there is a single label. Thus the nerve is the barycentric subdivision of the following regular complex: one vertex for each real chamber, two directed edges across each real edge, and one disk for every pair consisting of an arrangement vertex and an incident real chamber. The disk boundary follows the two shortest directed paths around that vertex from this chamber to the opposite chamber, one on each side. This follows directly by grouping the face-chain triangles with the same vertex-sector label; each group is the cone on the cyclic sequence of incident edges between those opposite chambers. This is the two-dimensional Salvetti cell description, here obtained from the explicit cover.
All constructions are equivariant. In step 1.2 use the Euclidean metric, so the partition is equivariant. No nerve simplex is setwise fixed by : a simplex has at most one facet of each dimension, so a fixed simplex would have fixed labels at each dimension; a real chamber cannot be fixed since it lies wholly on one side of the diagonal, and a fixed facet on the diagonal has its two sides or its incident sectors interchanged. Choose the finite contractions and extension data once for each orbit of simplices, and use their translates on the other members. The inductive pushout comparison of step 1.2 then provides equivariant inverse maps and equivariant homotopies. In particular these descend to homotopy equivalences of the quotients; an ordinary nonequivariant homotopy equivalence is not being used to justify this descent.
Label quotient chamber vertices by , , according to the two puncture intervals containing the coordinates, with the diagonal splitting a same-interval square into two exchanged chambers. There are diagonal loops , pairs of directed edges between and , and between and . Read the disk boundaries of step 4.1 at a double intersection and a triple intersection. At a double intersection they are , , , and . At a triple intersection they are , , and . This exhausts the two types of vertices of this arrangement, and is obtained by following the four or six sectors cyclically.
The fourth double-intersection disks and their barred edges form the ordinary staircase grid complex on the . It is contractible: in the realization as a square grid below a staircase, move horizontally to its leftmost column and then vertically to its bottom vertex; the horizontal sections are intervals containing that column. The same description includes , when it is an interval. Collapsing this subcomplex to a point is a homotopy equivalence, because it is a finite CW subcomplex and its contraction extends across collars of the attached cells. The second and third double-intersection disks now have boundaries and . Collapse these bigons successively to identify each row of -edges with and each column of -edges with . Their remaining boundaries are precisely the four words in the statement, with one vertex and no cells above dimension two.
For a homotopy equivalence carrying a specified normal subgroup of the fundamental group to the corresponding subgroup, lift it and an inverse after fixing basepoint lifts. Their compositions lift the identity homotopies; uniqueness of a lifted path, checked in successive evenly covered neighbourhoods, gives lifted homotopies between the compositions and the identity. The lifts commute with every deck transformation by the same uniqueness. Thus the corresponding covers are deck-equivariantly homotopy equivalent, and their ordinary absolute singular homology groups are identified. Apply this to the homotopy equivalences above and use [F1] for the unordered interpretation.
For the unit closed disk choose larger than the modulus of every puncture. A strictly increasing radial map fixing gives an injection of the disk into its interior fixing all punctures. Interpolating its radial function with the identity remains injective, fixes the punctures, and takes interior points to interior points. Applying it to both coordinates therefore proves that the interior inclusion is a homotopy equivalence of punctured configurations, also after coordinate interchange. An increasing radial homeomorphism fixing identifies the punctured plane with the punctured open disk, fixing the punctures. Both operations preserve the puncture and mutual winding characters, since their homotopies keep pairs distinct and avoid punctures. The lifting argument of step 8.1 therefore applies to these identifications too.
The two-variable covering homomorphism
Definition
Let be the two-point configuration space of the punctured disk, with basepoint and boundary-fixed action, of The two-point configuration space of a punctured disk. Let denote the free abelian group written multiplicatively with basis the two letters .
The winding form. Let be a loop in at (Based loops and the fundamental group). It can be written for continuous arcs in . The symmetric nonvanishing functions define closed loops in even when the mobile labels exchange. Define and as their integer winding numbers, using continuous argument lifts on the compact parameter interval. For piecewise smooth tracks this is equivalently The winding definition applies to arbitrary continuous loops; no differentiability of is presumed. The total puncture winding is , and is the mutual half-twist exponent, even for returning labels and odd for exchanged labels. A loop with one mobile point going positively around a single puncture in a small disk missing the other mobile point has . Exchanging the two mobile points by a positive half rotation in a small disk missing all punctures gives . Join these local configurations to by the finite-buffer paths of the configuration-space definition; conjugating the local loops does not alter winding numbers. Hence is surjective, with images and , including when .
The exponent-sum form. Ignoring the punctures turns into a loop in the space of unordered pairs of points of the disk, hence into a braid in (The braid group by Artin presentation); let be its exponent of . Adjoining the fixed punctures turns into a loop of unordered -tuples in the disk; that loop is a braid in , and the exponent sum of that braid in the Artin generators is written . Then and Equivalently, the parity statement is the relation : each mobile–puncture difference occurs squared in the full discriminant, while the fixed–fixed factors are constant and the mutual half-twist of the two mobile points contributes exactly the parity of .
The homomorphism. The two-variable covering homomorphism is It is well defined and a homomorphism of groups: path-homotopy classes have well-defined winding numbers and well-defined exponent sums, because the defining relations of the Artin presentation preserve the total exponent sum, and both and are additive under concatenation of loops, which is the product of Based loops and the fundamental group. Since the integers and are determined by the class , the formula defines a map; additivity of winding numbers and of exponent sums gives . The case is included, with .
The cover classified by and the resulting LKB module are built from this homomorphism on the same page; the variables and are the deck generators used there.
The absolute LKB cellular boundary and fraction-field rank
Statement
Let be the unordered configuration of two points in , where and . Let be the regular cover determined by where is the sum of the two mobile points' winding numbers around all punctures and is their mutual half-twist exponent. Write and .
In the preceding two-dimensional model, the absolute covering chain groups have bases in degree one and in degree two, with Ordinary absolute is the kernel of this differential. Its natural map to is injective, and that vector space has dimension . These claims do not assert integral freeness or injection into end-relative homology.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: , the real punctures, the cover determined by , and the rings and .
An equivariant two-dimensional model for the LKB configuration space supplies the two-dimensional quotient cell model, its attaching words, and the deck-equivariant lifted homotopy equivalence.
Cellular homology computes singular homology identifies the cellular homology of the covering CW complex with ordinary absolute singular homology.
Proof
Choose the directed edges in [F1] to make a positively oriented puncture meridian on returning along its barred edge. The barred grid is contractible, so its lift can be fixed consistently with every barred edge having displacement . The resulting and loops move one mobile point counterclockwise once around , with the other outside that small meridian disk. Thus their exponents are and their displacement is . Each crosses the diagonal between two real chambers exchanged by coordinate interchange; in the unordered quotient it exchanges the mobile points counterclockwise in their common puncture interval, enclosing no puncture. Its exponents are and its displacement is . Paths in the barred grid provide the basepoint paths, and changing those paths by a homotopy has no effect on these displacements. Both and occur, so the deck group is .
Lift every cell after fixing one basepoint lift. For a word, a positive edge contributes its prefix displacement times that edge, and an inverse edge contributes minus the displacement after traversing that inverse edge times the positive edge. Apply this to the four attaching words of [F1]. The word contributes . The word contributes . The word contributes . Finally contributes . These are exactly the displayed differential formulas. The lifted model has no 3-cells, so [F1] and [F2] identify with . These are absolute chains; no end neighbourhood or relative quotient has entered the construction.
Over , let be the span of all . Suppose has zero boundary. Its coefficient gives , and its coefficient then gives . The remaining boundary is . Since , its coefficient forces , its coefficient then forces , and successive coefficients force every . Hence also , and is injective. Projection onto the -coordinates is consequently injective on , giving an upper bound for its dimension.
Put and define , , and . Substitution gives , , and . Therefore the integral chains are cycles: the terms cancel the boundary of , and the terms telescope. Their -coordinates are in coordinate and zero elsewhere. Since , they are independent over . Together with step 3.1 this proves that the field kernel has dimension and basis . For there are no such chains, and step 3.1 says the full kernel is zero.
The ring is a domain: it is the localization of the polynomial domain by monomials. Its finite free module is torsion-free, and so is its submodule . If an element of maps to zero after localization, a nonzero denominator annihilates it; torsion-freeness makes it zero. Thus the localization map on absolute is injective. Moreover every field cycle becomes an integral cycle after multiplying by a common nonzero denominator of its finitely many cellular coordinates. Hence localization of is exactly , not just a subspace thereof. Step 4.1 now gives the asserted dimension. Integral spanning by the was never used or inferred.
The Lawrence-Krammer-Bigelow cover
Definition
Let be the two-point configuration space of the punctured disk with basepoint , and let be the two-variable covering homomorphism of The two-variable covering homomorphism. Let be the connected covering space of Covering maps, evenly covered neighbourhoods, fibres, sheets, and trivial coverings and Connected covering spaces are classified by conjugacy classes of fundamental-group subgroups classified by the subgroup , and let be a fixed point of the fibre over . The space is the Lawrence-Krammer-Bigelow cover (the LKB cover).
The hypotheses of Connected covering spaces are classified by conjugacy classes of fundamental-group subgroups hold: is nonempty and path-connected, and a configuration has a neighborhood homeomorphic to the product of two disjoint small convex disk or half-disk neighborhoods missing . These neighborhoods are contractible, so is locally path-connected and semilocally simply connected. Thus the specified based connected cover exists and is unique up to based isomorphism.
Regularity and deck group. Since is a normal subgroup of , the cover is regular (Galois): the deck group is isomorphic to , so it is free abelian of rank two. Write and also for the two deck transformations corresponding to the generators; every deck transformation maps to a point of the fibre over and acts on by homeomorphisms commuting with the projection.
The coefficient ring and the module. Put the Laurent polynomial ring in two commuting variables. The absolute singular homology carries a -module structure: define and for the induced automorphisms of and extend -linearly and multiplicatively; the deck transformations commute, so this is well defined and acts through a ring homomorphism . All homology groups below are ordinary absolute singular homology unless another coefficient module is displayed.
The conventions fixed here are: is unordered, and are the basepoints, deck translations act on the left, and is always the integral absolute second homology of the covering space, with the -module structure just defined.
The absolute LKB inclusion obtained by deleting the last puncture is saturated
Statement
Let , , be the unordered two-point configuration in the -punctured plane, and the configurations whose two points lie in . Use the winding character and compatible lifts in both spaces, and put , , .
The inclusion induces an injective map . In the field extension of , its image satisfies Here the smaller configuration is identified with the ordinary -puncture model by a homeomorphism of its half-plane with the plane. Equivalently, an integral absolute class lying in the fraction-field span of classes supported in this smaller configuration already comes from its integral absolute homology. This is the support implication used in the integral LKB basis induction.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: , the real punctures, the inclusion , and compatible lifts for the winding covers.
An equivariant two-dimensional model for the LKB configuration space supplies the collapsed two-dimensional absolute model and its attaching words. Compatibility with the half-plane inclusion is established below.
The absolute LKB cellular boundary and fraction-field rank identifies absolute second homology with the integral cellular kernel, and identifies its injective field extension with the field kernel.
Proof
Construct compatible models directly. For ordered configurations write , with , and use the real arrangement , , . A complexified line excludes exactly when its affine equation vanishes at and its linear part vanishes at . Choose with all punctures in and an increasing map fixing an interval containing them. Applying to both real coordinates preserves their order and all equalities with punctures, and leaves imaginary coordinates unchanged. It gives a homotopy equivalence to the subspace with real part in , and restricts to the smaller configuration, whose compressed real domain is . Cellulate the closed square by the arrangement and its boundary, choose the barycentres of its faces, and barycentrically subdivide. For every face not contained in the square boundary let be its open vertex star intersected with . These stars cover ; intersections occur exactly for face chains and contract by barycentric interpolation to the centroid of the specified vertices. A point in lies in a cofacet of , so every arrangement line through that point contains . Call retained when its relative interior lies in . Its star lies entirely in : every coface stays on the left side of each last-puncture line, and the positive weight at makes both inequalities strict. The retained stars cover , and their intersection contractions stay there.
For each and each open chamber of the linear arrangement parallel to the lines containing , put . The membership criterion of step 1.1 shows these are open sets of the ordered configuration space. They cover it: at a real point in facet , its imaginary part avoids precisely that local arrangement. Each nonempty intersection has a contractible star-intersection factor and a convex imaginary factor. Its labels form a face chain of length at most three. For retained , neither last-puncture line contains , so the local imaginary arrangement is exactly the smaller one. The retained therefore give a good cover of the smaller space by the same sets as in the larger cover. Their nerve is the subcomplex on the retained labels.
Here the good-cover comparison can be made compatible without choosing compatible inverse homotopies. For a finite open cover of a metric space , form the thick nerve from over its nonempty intersections, with the face identifications. Projection to is a homotopy equivalence: normalize , where is the maximum of these distances, to obtain a partition with supports locally contained in the covering sets; its graph is a section, and straight interpolation of simplex coordinates gives the inverse homotopy. Projection to the ordinary nerve is also a homotopy equivalence: filter by simplex dimension and compare the attachments with the simplex attachments. The projections on these products are homotopy equivalences since is contractible; collars of simplex boundaries give cofibrations, so the pushout comparison, equivalently its double-mapping-cylinder comparison, preserves homotopy equivalences at each finite stage. Both projection squares commute with inclusion for step 2.1's covers. Coordinate interchange preserves these covers. No nerve simplex is setwise fixed: it has at most one label of each face dimension, a fixed diagonal facet has its local chambers exchanged, and a two-dimensional facet lies on one side of the diagonal. Thus choose the finite contraction and extension data orbit by orbit; the comparisons are equivariant and descend to the unordered quotients. This identifies the actual half-plane inclusion with the nerve-subcomplex inclusion on absolute homology.
Group the face-chain triangles of the nerves into cells as follows: there is one vertex for each real chamber, two directed edges across each real edge, and one disk for each arrangement vertex and incident chamber. Around such a vertex the face-chain triangles with a fixed imaginary sector form a disk; its boundary follows the two directed paths from that chamber to its opposite chamber around the vertex. This describes the grouping directly and respects retained labels. In the unordered quotient label chamber vertices by the two puncture intervals, . The edges are loops at , edges and , and reversed barred edges. The retained vertices have , the retained double-intersection disks have , and the retained triple-intersection disks have .
The uncollapsed words can be checked locally, using the four sectors at a double intersection and six at a triple intersection. At the intersection indexed by , the four pairs of paths give , , , and . At the triple intersection indexed by , they give , , and . In each word the two paths run along opposite sides of the intersection, as prescribed in step 4.1. These formulas in particular show that every retained disk has only retained boundary edges.
The barred edges and fourth double-intersection disks form a contractible staircase grid on the : its planar realization has interval horizontal sections ending at the same left boundary, so move horizontally to that boundary and then vertically to its bottom vertex. For one puncture it is a tree and the same contraction applies. The retained grid is the smaller grid. Collapsing each grid is a homotopy equivalence, since a CW-subcomplex contraction extends to the whole complex and descends to the quotient homotopies. The inclusion sends the smaller grid into the larger, so the quotient square commutes. The second and third double-intersection disks now have boundaries and . Collapse every strip of such bigons to one edge, identifying each row with and each column with . Each strip is a finite sequence of disks identifying neighbouring edges; eliminating one disk and one neighbouring edge at a time, while transferring other attaching maps along that edge identification, gives a homotopy equivalence. The quotient maps send corresponding retained strips to the same labelled edges and hence commute with inclusion. The remaining attaching words are exactly those of [F1]. The resulting cellular inclusion sends and with indices at most to the same labelled cells, and similarly sends for and for .
Winding about is zero on the left half-plane. The meridian loops have deck displacement , the exchange loops have displacement , and the contracted grid has trivial displacement. Thus the commuting comparisons lift with the given compatible basepoint lifts and the same deck character. Step 3.1 and the commuting quotient squares show that the cellular inclusion represents the geometric inclusion in absolute covering homology; separate homotopy equivalences alone would not suffice. An orientation-preserving homeomorphism from the half-plane to the plane identifies the smaller cover with its ordinary -puncture model, preserving puncture and mutual winding. By [F2], the smaller cellular differential is the restriction of the larger one.
Write the larger degree-two free module as , using exactly the retained cells of step 6.1 for the first summand. Its integral kernel restricts on to the smaller integral kernel, since the differential formulas agree and the smaller degree-one module is a submodule of the larger. There are no degree-three boundaries in either model. Hence the map on absolute is the inclusion of these kernels and is injective.
Let lie in the field span of . In cellular coordinates its coordinates are zero over , since every smaller class has zero such coordinates. They were integral coordinates in the domain , so they are already zero over . The remaining coordinates form an integral vector in with zero boundary. Step 8.1 says it is an element of . The opposite inclusion in the displayed equality is immediate. This proves saturation without assuming integral freeness or equating a relative basis with an absolute basis; for the smaller kernel is zero by [F2].
The integral LKB module as absolute second homology
Definition
Let be the LKB cover of The Lawrence-Krammer-Bigelow cover, with basepoint lift , deck group and coefficient ring .
The integral Lawrence-Krammer-Bigelow module is the ordinary absolute singular homology with the -module structure in which the generators act by the deck translations of the cover. No relative group is substituted for it.
The groups introduced from the small end neighbourhoods are auxiliary pairing targets only: they are used as the second argument (and, for the primed pairing, as the first argument) of the LKB intersection pairing, but the representation and all matrix statements of this page are about the absolute module . In particular, no identification of with a relative or quotient module is asserted by this definition.
The relative pairing modules as stabilized direct limits
Definition
Let be the closed unit disk, , let be the two-point configuration space of the punctured disk with the distance function and let be the LKB cover of The Lawrence-Krammer-Bigelow cover.
For put and let be the preimage of in . Thus and whenever , and the identity inclusions of pairs induce the natural relative-homology maps from small radii to large radii.
The stabilized limits. By Equivariant stabilization of the LKB end neighbourhoods there is such that for all these inclusions are homotopy equivalences of pairs, with explicit inverse homotopy equivalences of pairs, and so induce isomorphisms in relative homology in every degree. The relative pairing modules are the direct limits taken in the category of abelian groups along the inverse transition maps which are the unique inverses of the natural maps. The stabilization lemma supplies these inverses explicitly and proves that they compose compatibly for ; consequently the inverse system is constant up to canonical isomorphism on and each of the two direct limits is canonically isomorphic, as an abelian group, to every group with (respectively to every boundary-union group). This is the stabilized direct limit convention: the natural relative maps themselves run from small to large radii, and the transition maps toward zero are their canonical inverses, not the natural maps.
The -module structure. A deck transformation of commutes with the projection, hence carries onto and preserves both pairs; the induced automorphisms commute with the inclusions and with the inverse transition maps, so they induce automorphisms of both direct limits. Extending multiplicatively gives both limits the structure of -modules, where acts through the deck translations and . These two -modules are the targets of the LKB pairing defined below; no element of either limit is claimed to be an absolute class.
Braids lift to the LKB cover and act Lambda-linearly
Statement
Assume AC. Every boundary-fixed homeomorphism of inducing on satisfies ; hence it has a unique lift fixing , which commutes with every deck transformation, and the induced map on is a -module automorphism. Composition of braid classes corresponds to composition of these automorphisms, so is a well-defined homomorphism.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: the standard configuration, a homeomorphism with , , and the induced basepoint-fixing homeomorphism of , also written ; the map , the LKB cover and the ring .
Lifting criterion for maps from path-connected locally path-connected spaces gives existence and uniqueness of a based lift through a covering, and Existence and uniqueness of homotopy lifts through a covering map lifts based homotopies uniquely. The homomorphism on fundamental groups induced by a pointed continuous map records the induced map .
Alexander contraction of the boundary-fixed disk homeomorphism group: the group of homeomorphisms of fixing pointwise is connected, so is isotopic to the identity relative to .
The two-variable covering homomorphism: for a loop one has with is the total puncture winding of the integral one-cycle (the endpoints cancel even when labels exchange) and with the exponent of the image of in the two-strand braid group.
Proof
The homeomorphism preserves , commutes with the interchange of coordinates and fixes ; it therefore induces a homeomorphism, again denoted , of with . Its induced automorphism of is The homomorphism on fundamental groups induced by a pointed continuous map.
The assignment depends only on the isotopy class of relative to . Once the based lifts are constructed below, an isotopy from to a homeomorphism , relative to , induces a homotopy of basepoint-fixing maps of ; lift starting from by [F1]. The lifted homotopy satisfies for every : the path lifts the constant path at and starts at , so it is constant by uniqueness of path lifting [F1]. Therefore is the unique lift of fixing , and it is homotopic to relative to the basepoint section; the induced maps on agree.
One has . For the -component, the tracks form an integral one-cycle in : its boundary is zero because the terminal unordered pair equals the initial pair. Winding is additive on this cycle, and [F3] gives . A boundary-fixed disk homeomorphism is orientation preserving by [F2]. It sends a positively oriented small meridian about to a positively oriented Jordan meridian about ; hence it permutes the puncture winding coordinates of every one-cycle. Equivalently . Summing gives . For the -component, is the exponent of the image of under the map induced by forgetting the punctures, where is the unordered two-point configuration space of the unpunctured disk. By [F2] choose an isotopy from to relative to ; forgetting the punctures turns it into a based homotopy from the identity of to the homeomorphism induced by . Hence induces the identity on and therefore preserves the exponent . Thus for every .
By step 2.1 the automorphism of preserves . The covering-space lifting criterion [F1] applied to therefore produces a unique lift with .
The lift commutes with every deck transformation. Let be a deck transformation and let be a loop in at representing the class corresponding to under . Then is again a deck transformation, and the class it corresponds to is , whose image under equals by step 2.1. As the deck group is and the correspondence is through , the two deck transformations and coincide. Hence for every , and in particular commutes with the generators and of the deck group.
Consequently is -linear: it commutes with the deck automorphisms that define the module structure. It is invertible because is again a boundary-fixing homeomorphism of satisfying , so by step 3.1 it has a lift fixing ; the composite of the two lifts in either order is a lift of the identity fixing , hence equals the identity of by uniqueness in [F1]. Thus .
The assignment is multiplicative. If is another such homeomorphism, then lifts and fixes , so by uniqueness ; on homology . Together with step 1.2 this makes a homomorphism from the boundary-fixed mapping class group to .
Finally, the classical braid group is identified with the boundary-fixed mapping class group of the punctured disk by Braid group as boundary-fixed punctured-disk mapping classes, which is where the Axiom of Choice is used; under this identification the homomorphism of step 6.1 is the claimed map on .
Forks, noodles and the LKB intersection pairing
Definition
Let , and be as in The two-point configuration space of a punctured disk, with the chosen boundary points of the lower arc, and let be the LKB cover with its pairing modules and of The relative pairing modules as stabilized direct limits.
Noodles. A noodle is an embedded edge with endpoints , whose interior lies in . Every noodle is oriented from to . Its surface is oriented by the orientation of as in Bigelow 2001 section 2, and denotes the lift of containing . The proper triangle has a collision end along its omitted diagonal. Its end-stable class is therefore not ordinary boundary-only homology. Parametrize by and truncate to , . This compact triangle lifts from ; its outer sides lie in and its third side lies in when is sufficiently small by uniform continuity. Differences of smaller truncations lie in that collision end, so the finite relative cycles define the compatible stabilized class.
Forks. A fork is an embedded tree with four vertices , such that , , and all three edges of have as a vertex. The edge containing is the handle of ; the union of the other two edges is the tine edge , an embedded edge from to through . The tine edge is oriented so that the handle lies to its right. A parallel copy of is a parallel tree whose handle starts at , obtained by pushing the tine and handle of off themselves and then translating the two tine endpoints through along the respective tine ends, as in Bigelow 2001 Figure 1; write for its trivalent vertex and for its tine edge. The surface of the fork is homeomorphic to the interior of the square and oriented by the two tine orientations. Let be the arc from to along the handle of and the arc from to along the handle of , and let be the lift of the arc in starting at ; the lifted surface is the lift of containing . Thus a fork presents a class ; the closed compact replacement of a multiple of this class is the subject of A multiple of a fork surface has a closed compact replacement.
The LKB pairing. For and let denote the algebraic intersection number of representatives in general position, and let denote the image of under the deck transformation . The LKB pairing is Interchanging the two variables with the two relative modules gives the primed pairing The geometric fork/noodle polynomial in finite transverse position is the signed sum of its labelled deck intersections. For a closed absolute replacement of , with , it satisfies This uses the absolute/end-stable pairing, not a generic pairing of two end-relative modules. The finite diagram sum and this identity are verified in The fork-noodle pairing is well defined and equivariant; the sum displayed here is shown to be finite, independent of representatives and -sesquilinear in that item.
Sesquilinearity. For in the appropriate modules and one has where ; the second identity uses that the intersection number is additive in each variable and that the deck action on the second variable conjugates the coefficient. These identities are verified in The fork-noodle pairing is well defined and equivariant.
The relative modules occur in this page only as targets of the two pairings; the representation itself lives on the absolute module The integral LKB module as absolute second homology.
The lexicographic order on fork-noodle deck monomials
Definition
Let be a noodle and a fork of Forks, noodles and the LKB intersection pairing, and let be the two-variable covering homomorphism of The two-variable covering homomorphism.
Order. The lexicographic order on the deck monomials is The -exponent is compared first. A monomial from a finite list is maximal if for all pairs of the list.
Labelled intersections. Put the tine edge and the noodle in transverse position and let be the intersection points of with , ordered along . Choose a parallel copy so that the tine edge meets transversely at points , where and are joined by a short arc of lying in the narrow strip between and . For define the arc in assembled from the following embedded arcs in : from to along the handle of ; from to along the handle of ; from to along ; from to along ; from to along , where is such that does not pass through ; and from to along , where is such that does not pass through (necessarily : the earlier point along returns to and the later point to ).
Monomial and sign labels. The pair carries the deck monomial which is a well-defined element of ; the exponent satisfies by Bigelow 2001 Lemma 2.1. The pair also carries the sign the sign of the transverse intersection of the surfaces and at the point over .
The list of labelled pairs is kept distinct from its sum: the unsummed labelled intersections are the geometric data just described, whereas the Laurent polynomial obtained after collecting equal monomials is the pairing value whose representative-independence and finiteness are proved in The fork-noodle pairing is well defined and equivariant. This definition fixes the order, the labels and the distinction, as used by the extremal-term lemma and the geometric computation of the pairing.
A multiple of a fork surface has a closed compact replacement
Statement
For every fork there is a class in represented by an immersed closed surface that agrees with outside a small neighbourhood of the two tine punctures. Consequently the paired intersection is independent of the escape-to-infinity behaviour of the non-compact surfaces and .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: a fork with tine endpoints , its surface and a noodle of Forks, noodles and the LKB intersection pairing; the two-variable covering homomorphism and the LKB cover.
Long exact sequence of a pair supplies, for the pair , the exact sequence of -modules.
A relative class has a finite chain representative whose boundary is in the relative subspace (Relative singular homology); finite homotopies give the prism boundary identity (The singular chain homotopy formula).
Proof
Let be disjoint closed disks with for , and let Fix a basepoint with and , choose a lift of in , and let be the preimage of . The component containing the chosen lift is a covering space, and is the kernel of the restriction of to , viewed inside through the inclusion . The surface has both tine coordinates in a neighbourhood of or of near its boundary, so it represents a class .
Using the arcs of Bigelow 2001 Figure 2, define elements of by where is a loop in based at enclosing once counterclockwise, is the analogous loop in , and , are the six displayed corridor pieces: runs from to along one shore of the tine neighborhood, and runs from to along the other. The first and last pieces stay inside their endpoint disks; the middle pieces are disjoint corridors outside the punctures. In each braced path pair one coordinate remains in an endpoint disk while the other uses the corridor, so every stage lies in . Their total puncture windings are zero and their mutual half-twist exponents are1, giving ; also . Thus and the full preimage is connected. The following relations hold in : The first is immediate because and can be representatives of the two coordinates supported in disjoint disks. For the second, is equal in to , where is a curve based at which passes counterclockwise around and ; the third relation follows by the same argument with the roles of the two coordinates interchanged.
Define elements of by where conjugates of elements of by elements again lie in . Rewriting the defining words in terms of gives the following relations in : Indeed, the first three translate into relations (2)–(4), and the fourth translates into a trivial identity.
For let denote its image in . Since conjugation by acts on the kernel of by the deck transformation , one has . Applying this to relations (5)–(8) gives Multiplying the last relation by with , annihilates the terms by the first three relations, and the left side is ; since is a unit,
The boundary map of the pair sends to : the boundary of the lifted surface in is the loop represented by , as read off from the arc decomposition defining and . By , the class lies in the kernel of ; exactness of the sequence of [F1] therefore produces with Representing this class by an immersed surface in general position with respect to the boundary, one may take to agree with outside the open set and to be closed and compact inside ; this is the claimed class. It may be taken away from the disk boundary: the filled tine images are compact inside the disk, so choose an outer radial collar disjoint from them and from the two puncture disks. Its inward injective compression fixes the fork chain, preserves because its near-puncture coordinate is fixed, and moves any remaining capping part off the boundary; [F2] keeps the absolute class unchanged.
Let be a noodle and choose the disks so small that ; this is possible because is compact and disjoint from . Then is disjoint from , so all its intersections with and with occur outside , where the two surfaces agree up to the factor . Write as a finite sum of deck monomials. Outside the closed chain equals . Every translated noodle misses . Translation invariance of intersection therefore gives The coefficient at a single is a convolution of the fork intersection counts; multiplication by applies to the full Laurent sum, rather than to each integer count. The left-hand sum is finite without a generic assertion about noncompact translates. The compact replacement has projection with a positive minimum collision distance. Uniform continuity of the compact noodle lets us truncate its triangle by a common positive parameter gap, capturing every possible intersection for every deck translate. That one lifted truncated triangle is compact. Two compact sets in a regular covering meet in only finitely many relative deck positions, by a finite evenly-covered-chart argument.
The diagram polynomial is homologically determined. The truncated noodle is a relative cycle in , not boundary-only homology. Choose small enough to miss the compact replacement and any compact chain bounding a homologous replacement; choose all first-argument chains away from the disk boundary using the collar of step 4.1. The oriented boundary identity for transverse finite chains then makes their intersection counts invariant: the end and boundary terms miss the other argument, and a compact one-chain has total signed boundary zero. The finite prism compares homologous noodle truncations in the same way. Differences between two closing choices come from by [F1], and have no intersections with any translated noodle because its projection avoids . For isotopies choose disjoint from the entire compact noodle trace and truncate the fork ends uniformly; [F2] gives the same relative-chain comparison. Thus the right side of step 5.1 is invariant. The nonzero factor cancels in the Laurent domain, proving the original finite fork/noodle polynomial is independent of these choices and of escape behavior. No intersection of two classes approaching the same collision end has been asserted.
The fork-noodle pairing is well defined and equivariant
Statement
For and the Laurent sum has only finitely many nonzero terms and depends only on the homology classes. It is -sesquilinear, and for every braid class one has ; the same statements hold for .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: the LKB cover, the stabilized relative modules, the two displayed Laurent sums, and finite transverse fork/noodle diagrams.
Ordinary relative cycles are finite chains whose boundaries lie in the relative subspace; equal relative classes differ by an ordinary boundary and a chain in that subspace (Relative singular homology, Relative singular chain complex). Homotopies give the finite prism chain formula (The singular chain homotopy formula).
The compact replacement of A multiple of a fork surface has a closed compact replacement has relative image , where , and agrees with that fork chain outside the two small tine-puncture neighborhoods. Their radius may be chosen below the distance from a compact noodle or its entire isotopy trace.
The Laurent ring is a domain: use integer cancellation (The integers have no zero divisors; multiplicative cancellation), polynomial-domain preservation (A polynomial ring over an integral domain is an integral domain) and localization at nonzero monomials (Multiplicative subsets and the localisation as equivalence classes of fractions). In particular .
Boundary-fixed filled-disk homeomorphisms have the explicit Alexander isotopy (Alexander contraction of the boundary-fixed disk homeomorphism group). The covering character is total puncture winding and mutual half-twist winding (The two-variable covering homomorphism).
Proof
Finite supports and the required separation. Every ordinary relative cycle is a finite chain, hence has compact image by [F1]. For the primed pairing choose the compact boundary-only second cycle and any compact bounding chains first; their projections have a positive lower bound on . Represent the first, end-stable class at a radius smaller than this bound. For the unprimed pairing choose the compact absolute first cycle and bounding chains first, then represent the boundary-plus-end class at a sufficiently small radius. Deck translates have the same projections, so these separations are uniform in all deck elements. Push the first argument and its bounding chains off the disk boundary by a fixed radial compression: take , put below and above it, and interpolate with the identity. Each map is injective and 1-Lipschitz, fixes all punctures, and sends each candidate puncture or collision distance to at most its old value. Thus it preserves every , lifts from the identity and gives the relative prism equivalence. The final compressed chains miss ; the end radius chosen from the opposite chain remains valid. We always compare compressed representatives, applying a common compression to compact bounding chains. No two end-relative arguments are paired.
The finite intersection boundary identity. Subdivide the finitely many singular simplices and their identified faces until their images lie in evenly covered ordered-coordinate charts of . On compact pieces away from punctures and collisions, linear interpolation after a sufficiently fine subdivision remains in valid configurations; chart changes only interchange the two planar coordinate blocks. Approximate and perturb the finitely many vertices, compatibly on identified faces, while fixing portions near separated relative boundaries. The necessary affine general-position conditions exclude finitely many proper determinant zero sets; a point in the permitted open parameter boxes can be chosen off their union, requiring only finite choices. This yields finite piecewise linear transverse intersections. Two oriented 2-chains have a signed zero-dimensional intersection; a 3-chain and a 2-chain have a one-dimensional intersection. Its boundary consists precisely of intersections of their boundary faces, with the product boundary signs: paired interior faces cancel. In particular, when the relative-boundary terms are disjoint as in step 1.1, changing a representative by a relative boundary changes the signed count by the total oriented boundary of a compact one-chain, which is zero. The finite prism construction compares different subdivisions or perturbations by the same identity. This establishes the homological intersection count needed here without an unproved assertion that relative fork/noodle classes generate absolute homology.
Finiteness and homology invariance of both sums. If are the compact supports of the two chosen finite chains, only finitely many deck translates of meet : cover their projections by finitely many evenly covered neighborhoods and their supports by finitely many lifted pieces; for each pair of sheets at most one deck element identifies them. Hence the Laurent sum has finite support. Step 2.1 proves invariance for each term under a homologous replacement, using the compact bounding chains and smaller radius of step 1.1. The same argument proves compatibility with the canonical stabilized end transitions. It applies both to an absolute/boundary-plus-end pair and to an end-relative/boundary-only pair, with the first-chain collar ensuring separation. Therefore both asserted sums are well defined on their exact stated modules.
Sesquilinearity. Finite-chain addition gives additivity. For a deck element , changing indices in the finite sum gives and , since deck maps preserve the covering orientation and is abelian. Integer-linear extension gives the stated involution . The calculation is identical for the primed pair.
The fork/noodle polynomial uses a closed first argument. The compact image of avoids every puncture; choose the two closing neighborhoods in [F2] disjoint from it. Truncate its proper triangle to obtain the finite end-stable cycle of the Definition. Outside the closing neighborhoods equals , while every translate of the noodle misses those neighborhoods. Thus term-by-term intersection, with the 2-dimensional factor interchange sign , gives , where the rightmost polynomial is the original finite labelled diagram sum. Different absolute closing choices have the same image in the puncture-neighborhood relative group; the pair exact sequence makes their difference a class supported in those neighborhoods, whose pairing with every translated noodle is zero. For an isotopy or parallel-copy change, choose the neighborhoods disjoint from the full compact noodle trace and truncate the fork ends uniformly; the finite relative prism and the same boundary identity give the identical scaled polynomial. Since [F3] gives in a domain, cancellation proves equality of the original -valued finite diagram polynomials. This does not divide by to define a pairing of two end-relative modules.
Equivariance on the asserted arguments. A boundary-fixed orientation-preserving disk representative acts on preserving total puncture winding and mutual half-twist winding, so its normalized lift fixing commutes with every deck element. The latter winding invariance follows also from the boundary-fixed Alexander disk isotopy after the punctures are forgotten. Under an oriented homeomorphism every local intersection degree, and hence the finite chain count, is unchanged. Thus and summing gives the asserted equivariance for both exact pairs. For fork/noodle diagrams apply the same identity to and cancel as in step 5.1; image closing neighborhoods may be shrunk using the full compact trace. This proves invariance for every supplied boundary-fixed disk representative; it does not require an inverse identification of mapping classes with braid words. The construction uses supplied finite chains, finite coordinate perturbations and unique lifts, and introduces no choice principle.
Remarks
The noncompact noodle triangle is end-relative as well as boundary-relative. The compact dual squares use two disjoint full chords and are boundary-only; they are legitimate second arguments of the primed pairing. The former generation claim for absolute homology by relative fork/noodle classes was unsupported and ill-typed; none of the proof above uses it.
Closed LKB basis surfaces have the three required topological types and factors
Statement
For let be the square or triangle of Bigelow section 4.1: the square for the edges , when ; the square for and an edge from to in the lower half-plane when , ; the square for , when ; and the triangle for when . Then there is whose image in is for , for , and otherwise; these are realized by the explicit genus three, genus two and genus one closed surfaces. The pairings are units of . For , the off-diagonal pairing is a Laurent unit, whereas is a Laurent unit times : it is nonzero but is not a unit. All remaining pairings vanish, so the pairing matrix is triangular with unit diagonal.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: the standard disk with punctures , the relative modules and pairings of The relative pairing modules as stabilized direct limits, and the closed compact replacement of A multiple of a fork surface has a closed compact replacement.
Bigelow 2002 section 3.1 defines the square of two edges with disjoint interiors by lifting . Puncture-ended squares lie in ; disjoint boundary-ended squares lie in ; mixed-endpoint squares lie in . The triangle of one edge lifts on . It lies in when both endpoints are punctures, and in when either endpoint is on , since its omitted diagonal is a collision end.
The dual class is the square of two vertical edges, one just to the right of and one just to the left of , with endpoints on and orientations as in Bigelow 2002 section 4.1.
The primed pairing on an end-relative first class and a boundary-only second class is a finite deck-labelled intersection sum, invariant under relative homology (The fork-noodle pairing is well defined and equivariant). No pairing of two end-relative arguments is used.
Proof
The generic square. For take the two specified disjoint edges; for , , use the specified real edge and lower-half-plane edge, which likewise have four distinct endpoints. Replace that lower arc by a small monotone polygonal graph, if necessary: convex interpolation inside the puncture-free lower half-disk keeps it disjoint from the real first edge, and uniform truncation at the fixed endpoints gives the same relative square by [F3]. Only a homotopy of the product map is needed, not an isotopy of nonsimple intermediate arcs. We now use finite straight/polygonal geometry. Choose disjoint thin disk neighborhoods containing exactly their respective endpoint pairs. Let be disjoint figure-eights in , lying in its disk, with opposite lobe windings about its two punctures, as in Bigelow Figure 2. The map sends the meridian and the longitude of the torus into , because the two lobe puncture windings sum to zero, and the moving coordinate lies in a disk missing the stationary coordinate, so its mutual winding is zero; hence lifts to and represents a class in . Comparing with a small square around the four punctures shows that its image in is times the square : cut each figure-eight along its edge after truncating the puncture ends; its two oppositely oriented lifted edge contributions differ by the puncture deck translation , giving times the relative edge. The product gives both factors (Bigelow 2002, Section 3). This realizes with the factor and the underlying surface is a torus, of the asserted genus one type.
The exceptional square . Choose figure-eights with opposite lobe windings around and , meeting twice in a small disk about . The disk meets each curve in one embedded segment ; identify these intervals with . Remove the open product square from the torus, giving a once-punctured torus on which is defined. Rotate the boundary configuration in through angle to obtain . Choose symmetric segments so . Glue two copies of using the annulus , attached identically at one end and by coordinate interchange at the other; set on each copy and on the annulus. This gives a continuous map from a closed orientable genus-two surface. Its four meridian/longitude generators have zero winding characters as in step 1.1, so it lifts. The annulus lies in an arbitrarily small end neighborhood. A path across it exchanges the two mobile points about , with character , while the two copies have the same induced orientation. Their relative contributions therefore add to .
The adjacent triangle. Let be figure-eights both going around and and intersecting transversely in four points, as in Bigelow Figure 5. Now the surface is a torus with two disks removed, one for each puncture, and two annuli glue two copies of ; the meridian and longitude characters are zero as in step 1.1. Each boundary component traverses each mobile segment forward and back, with zero puncture winding; its two local crossings have opposite signs, so the mutual winding is also zero. Both annulus transports have character , so the extra loop crossing one and returning through the other has character1. These tracks generate the surface group, so the resulting closed genus three surface and its map lift to . Its image in is times a square, which in this configuration is times the triangle on ; cut the square on the parallel edges along its diagonal, which maps into an arbitrarily small collision neighborhood. The two resulting triangles differ by exchange of the mobile coordinates, reversing product orientation and transporting the lift by the half-twist . Their relative contributions are therefore the triangle and its negative translate, giving .
The definitions of . For take the square of and ; for , take the square of and of an edge from to whose interior lies in the lower half-plane; for take the square of and ; and for take the triangle on . Each of these classes lies in . The constructions of steps 1.1–2.2 supply for each of them a class whose image is the asserted multiple: , and respectively. The generic torus construction of step 1.1 applies to both four-distinct-endpoint square cases; the exceptional genus-two case is only , and the genus-three cases are the adjacent triangles.
The diagonal and first exception. Choose the vertical chords of [F2] with sufficiently small horizontal offsets. A generic real-edge square has one point on the left chord in its first edge and one point on the right chord in its second; swapping this assignment is impossible because the ordered puncture intervals are disjoint. The square likewise has only this diagonal configuration. An adjacent triangle has exactly one configuration, with its two edge parameters ordered. Each diagonal therefore contributes one signed deck monomial, a Laurent unit. For with , let and let be the lower arc from to . We may use a graph strictly below the real line and monotone in its horizontal coordinate: the lower half-disk is convex and contains no puncture, so the compact relative-end homotopy from any supplied lower arc to this graph remains disjoint from ; truncation near the puncture ends gives the same relative square class. The diagonal dual has its right chord beyond and gives one configuration. For its left chord is before and its right chord meets ; only the assignment occurs, again one signed monomial.
The second exception has two terms. For let and . Both full vertical chords meet both and . The two configurations are and . Orient left to right and both chords upward. In the ordered local chart the intersection determinants are at and at . The four planar determinants are positive, so the signs are opposite. In the square on go from to by moving the first point east along and the second west along ; return in the dual square by moving down the right chord and up the left chord. All tracks lie in the puncture-free strip , so their total puncture winding is zero. Along the first path the difference of the labelled mobile points stays in the upper half-plane and moves from negative to positive real part; along the return its real part is positive and its imaginary part moves from positive to negative. Its final value is the negative of its initial value, with total angle decrease . Thus the loop has character . If the translate of the dual lift meeting the first square at is , path lifting makes the translate at equal to . The primed sum is therefore in these orientations. This is a Laurent unit times . Reversing orientations or changing lifts changes only that unit. The two monomials are distinct, proving nonzero; augmentation gives zero, whereas a Laurent unit must map to a unit of , so the pairing is not a unit.
Zero entries and the triangular matrix. A chord meeting must be either the left chord just after or the right chord just before . Checking which other chord meets leaves exactly the diagonal and the two exceptions above; all remaining projected surfaces can be chosen disjoint. The corresponding check for the real generic squares, adjacent triangles and square leaves only their diagonal. Order pairs by increasing , then increasing . The exceptions in row lie in columns and , both earlier than that row's diagonal. The matrix is lower triangular with Laurent-unit diagonal; finite triangular elimination therefore makes it invertible over , regardless of its nonunit off-diagonal entry. This proves all asserted basis/type/factor and pairing conclusions. The source pairing lemma's extra claim that the second exception is a unit is contradicted by the explicit two-point calculation in step 5.1; it is not used here.
Extremal fork-noodle terms have one sign and cannot cancel
Statement
Assume AC. Put the tine and the noodle in transverse position with the minimal number of intersection points, assume , and label the pairs by monomials and signs . If is maximal among the monomials, then , hence ; consequently every term of the pairing carrying a maximal monomial has the same sign and the maximal coefficient of is nonzero.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: a noodle and a fork , placed with the tine and in minimal position by Minimal-position representatives and the arc bigon criterion; the labelled intersections , the parallel points , the monomials and signs of The lexicographic order on fork-noodle deck monomials.
The exponent formula holds for all ; it is Bigelow 2001 Lemma 2.1, proved from the explicit computation of the arcs .
The sign formula is Bigelow 2001 equation (1), proved from the orientations of and .
Proof
Let be maximal in the lexicographic order. Then is maximal among the integers , hence and . By [F1], and the two inequalities must be equalities; this is possible only if .
To prove , suppose , the only possible strict inequality by maximality and step 1.1. Let run from to along , and let return along . If misses , lifting the loop with one point fixed at gives , where . If passes through , push it locally so lies to its left; this contributes one positive half twist, giving . In either case .
In the infinite cyclic cover lift , then from its endpoint. Choose a clockwise return loop at , winding times about , nullhomotopic in , and meeting only at its endpoints. It can be drawn in a thin puncture-free neighborhood of an access path to ; its lifted spiral is embedded and joins the endpoint of back to the start of . Let be the first intersection of with , and take the initial and final at this point. Then is a Jordan curve. Its bounded disk lies to its left: the clockwise spiral leaves a noncompact region on the right. The labelled-loop winding computation gives . Maximality forces this nonnegative integer to be zero. Hence the disk misses the lifted punctures and its projected boundary is nullhomotopic in . This is the disk calculation in Bigelow 2001's extremal-claim proof, printed p. 481 (the precise claim number is recorded in the source locator).
The projection of need not be embedded. If it is a Jordan curve, cancellation of the nullhomotopic shows it bounds a puncture-free digon. Otherwise the portions of entering are disjoint arcs with both endpoints on . Choose an innermost such arc and its corresponding side . The latter has no further intersections with , so its projection meets only at the two endpoints. Thus is an embedded loop. Its lifted disk is contained in the puncture-free , so the projected loop is nullhomotopic and bounds a puncture-free digon by Jordan separation. In both cases the parallel tine and cobound a digon, which transfers across the narrow parallel strip to and and contradicts minimality. Therefore .
For the other diagonal keep the second point fixed at and move the first point: let run from to along and let return from to along . Maximality and step 1.1 give . Suppose the inequality is strict. If misses , the lift of compares the lifts at and , giving with . If passes through , detour with on its left. This inserts a positive half turn of the moving point about the fixed point relative to the noodle return, so the same lift comparison gives . Hence in either case. Repeat steps 3.1–4.1 in the cyclic cover of , based at , using the clockwise nullhomotopic return near . At the first lifted intersection of and , now a lift of some unprimed , the oriented disk has puncture count . This follows from the same labelled-loop computation, with the first coordinate moving and the second fixed; no coordinate interchange changes the puncture-winding sum. The count is nonnegative and at most zero, since is globally maximal. The disk is therefore puncture-free, and the innermost-arc argument of step 4.1 gives a digon between and , contradicting minimality. Thus , and step 4.1 gives both diagonal monomial equalities. This comparison uses maximality of and the diagonal -exponents, without assuming maximality of .
By [F2] and step 5.1, if is maximal then ; the same holds for every pair whose monomial equals the maximal monomial . Hence all terms of carrying the maximal monomial have the same sign, and since monomials are compared in the lexicographic order, the coefficient of the maximal monomial in is, up to sign, the number of such terms, which is at least one. In particular .
Fraction-field coefficients of an integral LKB class are Laurent polynomials
Statement
Let for be such that lies in . Then for all ; equivalently the closed surfaces span over .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: the closed surfaces and dual classes of Closed LKB basis surfaces have the three required topological types and factors, the pairings of The fork-noodle pairing is well defined and equivariant, and the fraction-field rank and saturated inclusion of The absolute LKB cellular boundary and fraction-field rank and The absolute LKB inclusion obtained by deleting the last puncture is saturated.
(Bigelow 2002, Lemma 4.6, printed p. 11.) For all the dual class is a multiple of in . This is the finite-strip decomposition of source Figure7. Move the two vertical edges, relative to the boundary/end homology, into disjoint U-shaped edges enclosing the prefix punctures and suffix punctures . Cut each U along finitely many radial arcs ending in small puncture neighborhoods. The paired shores have opposite orientations and their lifts differ by (or on the opposite oriented U), so each radial piece has coefficient a Laurent unit times (respectively ). Pieces lying on the outer boundary or inside an end neighborhood are zero in the indicated relative group. The two U regions are disjoint, so their product pieces never collide and introduce no additional mutual winding. Thus the finite product decomposition factors out , a unit multiple of . The number of pieces depends on the two puncture clusters; it is not an asserted universal eight-piece count.
(Bigelow 2002, Lemma 4.5, printed p. 11.) The class is a multiple of in . The source cuts the square by the four lines , , , into eight triangles (the antidiagonal in the unit-square coordinates); restricted to the eight pieces the lifted representative represents times the triangle on the edge , and the sum of these eight coefficients is
The last-column pairings hold up to a Laurent unit: For , . After subtracting the adjacent terms, satisfies The class is a multiple of . These are precisely the separate higher-rank and residual three-puncture computations of Bigelow's Lemma 4.4 proof, not one formula for all ranks. They use the diagonal and last-column pairings and the closing factors. The nonunit off-diagonal exception of the corrected surface lemma does not enter a last-column pairing, and it is absent at .
The integers have no zero divisors (The integers have no zero divisors; multiplicative cancellation), polynomial extension preserves this property (A polynomial ring over an integral domain is an integral domain), and localization is the fraction construction of Multiplicative subsets and the localisation as equivalence classes of fractions. Localizing or at powers of the variables gives the Laurent domains and : the denominators are nonzero monomials, so clearing them preserves both equality and nonzero products.
Proof
The exact denominator-removal calculation. Put and , both domains by [F4]. Evaluation has kernel : clear negative powers and write each as . Suppose and , where . Then , and evaluation gives , forcing . Therefore with , and cancellation gives . This applies to and to , whose evaluated values are and , both nonzero. No UFD assertion or parameter specialization of the representation is required.
The ranks below three. For there are no coefficients; the declared absolute rank calculation and localization injection give . For only occurs. By [F3] its pairing is a unit times . Divisibility of the dual class by in [F1], together with sesquilinearity, gives , since is a unit multiple of . Divisibility in [F2] gives , since conjugating any of the three factors changes it only by a unit. Step 1.1 therefore gives .
Reduction to and to a single coefficient. Assume and the statement known for punctures. For use the pairing with and [F1]: since is divisible by , sesquilinearity gives , and by [F3] , so . For , [F1] and [F2] give and , so by step 1.1. Subtracting the finitely many terms leaves an integral class supported in the smaller configuration, which by The absolute LKB inclusion obtained by deleting the last puncture is saturated already lies in the image of ; induction on reduces the statement to .
The case . By [F3] and [F1], ; by [F3] and [F2], ; step 1.1 gives . The reflected real-puncture picture gives the identical argument at the first puncture for : reflection interchanges the two adjacent classes and inverts the deck variables, an automorphism of preserving the denominator-removal calculation. Thus . Then is integral, so it remains to show from and ([F3]). Since is a multiple of , the first pairing lies in , hence . The second pairing lies in , hence . Step 1.1 with gives .
Spanning. The classes are independent over by the triangular pairing matrix with Laurent-unit diagonal of Closed LKB basis surfaces have the three required topological types and factors, and the field kernel of the cellular differential has dimension by The absolute LKB cellular boundary and fraction-field rank; hence they form a -basis of . Every integral class is therefore a -linear combination with , and steps 2.1, 2.2 and 3.1 show that all coefficients lie in . Thus the closed surfaces span over , as claimed.
The fork-noodle pairing detects essential intersections
Statement
Assume AC. Let be a noodle and a fork of Forks, noodles and the LKB intersection pairing. Then
Facts & Assumptions
Given: a noodle and a fork in the disk with puncture set , with the conventions of Forks, noodles and the LKB intersection pairing and The lexicographic order on fork-noodle deck monomials.
For and in transverse position with intersection points, the pairing equals the finite geometric sum of the labelled intersections, and its value depends only on the isotopy classes of and relative to ; in particular any isotopic choice of representative of the tine edge gives the same pairing. This is The lexicographic order on fork-noodle deck monomials together with the representative-independence and equivariance proved in The fork-noodle pairing is well defined and equivariant.
Extremal fork-noodle terms have one sign and cannot cancel: if and are in minimal position with intersection points, then every term of carrying a maximal monomial has one sign and the maximal coefficient is nonzero, so .
Minimal-position representatives and the arc bigon criterion: admits a minimal-position representative, and is isotopic relative to its endpoints to an arc disjoint from if and only if every minimal-position representative is disjoint from .
Proof
Assume first that is isotopic relative to to an arc disjoint from . Choose such a representative of the isotopy class of with ; the finitely many intersection points of with number . Then the geometric sum of [F1] is empty, so , and representative-independence in [F1] gives . This proves the implication from disjointness to vanishing.
For the converse, suppose cannot be isotoped relative to to an arc disjoint from . By [F3] every minimal-position representative of meets ; choose such a representative and let be its number of intersection points with ; the corresponding fork is isotopic to relative to . The minimal position hypothesis of [F2] is satisfied, so the maximal monomial of the geometric sum occurs with a single sign and nonzero coefficient, whence . By representative-independence in [F1] again, . This proves the contrapositive.
Fork detection transports to arbitrary boundary crosscuts
Statement
Assume AC. Let be a fork with compact absolute replacement , and let be any simple proper crosscut of with two distinct endpoints on . Choose the closing neighborhoods of disjoint from . Its triangle of unordered pairs defines an end-stable boundary-relative class , with any chosen lift. Then Here the pairing has an absolute first argument and an end-stable boundary-relative second argument. No pairing of two end-relative classes is asserted.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: the LKB cover and Laurent ring , the fork, its compact absolute replacement, and the crosscut; the replacement is chosen using closing neighborhoods disjoint from the compact image of , which avoids all punctures.
A multiple of a fork surface has a closed compact replacement supplies , supported away from the outer boundary and using closing neighborhoods disjoint from , representing times the fork class, where .
The fork-noodle pairing is well defined and equivariant supplies the exact absolute/end-stable pairing, finite-chain naturality, and the identity . The Laurent ring is an integral domain.
The fork-noodle pairing detects essential intersections gives zero detection for the original fixed-boundary-endpoint noodle.
Proof
First choose the closing neighborhoods small enough to miss ; this is possible because its compact image misses . Choose enclosing , the filled tine, the chosen closed closing neighborhoods, and the projection of the compact support of ; all are compact in the interior of . Write the two source boundary angles in positive cyclic order and likewise the two target angles of ; choose the ordering of the target endpoints accordingly. There is an increasing piecewise linear lift with taking the two source angles to those targets. Interpolate . For a radial cutoff equal to zero on and one at , set . The angular maps are strictly increasing degree-one homeomorphisms; their inverses vary continuously by compactness. Thus is a filled-disk isotopy, identity on , carrying the source endpoint pair to the target pair. Its configuration-space isotopy lifts from the identity, commutes with every deck transformation by uniqueness of lifts, and fixes pointwise since every track on its support is constant.
The crosscut is an original noodle with endpoints . The closing neighborhoods are fixed by , hence also miss . Its triangle class exists by the same parameter-gap truncation as any noodle: truncate by , with the new edge in a collision neighborhood by uniform continuity. Transport this class by the lifted isotopy to obtain . An arbitrary choice of its lift differs by a deck monomial unit. The finite intersection naturality in [F2] and step 1.1 give for a Laurent monomial unit . Hence vanishing is equivalent to the last diagram polynomial vanishing, since . By [F3] this means that the tine can be isotoped off . Conjugate that isotopy by : it still fixes and fixes the outer boundary pointwise at every time, while fixes the tine. This is exactly disjoinability from . The inverse conjugation proves the reverse implication.
The integral LKB module is free of rank n choose two
Statement
Let , let and let be the LKB cover of The Lawrence-Krammer-Bigelow cover. Then is a free -module of rank . Explicitly, the closed surfaces () of Closed LKB basis surfaces have the three required topological types and factors, whose images in are form a -basis of . Here are the relative squares and triangles of that lemma.
For the integral module and Krammer's free matrix module are isomorphic only after extending scalars to ; they are not isomorphic as -modules (with the fixed parameter convention), although their underlying free -modules are isomorphic, and no integral identification of the two bases is asserted.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: the LKB cover , the ring , the field , the closed surfaces and dual classes of Closed LKB basis surfaces have the three required topological types and factors and the coefficient statement of Fraction-field coefficients of an integral LKB class are Laurent polynomials.
The absolute LKB cellular boundary and fraction-field rank: the natural map is injective and has dimension over .
Closed LKB basis surfaces have the three required topological types and factors: the closed surfaces have the displayed images in , and the matrix of primed pairings is triangular with diagonal entries that are units of ; hence it is invertible after extending scalars to .
Fraction-field coefficients of an integral LKB class are Laurent polynomials: if and lies in , then for all .
Bigelow 2002 Section4.2 identifies the fraction-field representations, with . Paoluzzi–Paris Section4, Lemma4.5 and Proposition4.6, realize that matrix representation integrally as inside the absolute cellular kernel of [F1], with the fixed deck parameters. Here and These are the explicit cycles in [F1]'s proof4.1. Reading the cellular half-twist images (the source's complete cell-image formulas in Lemma4.5) and substituting these cycles gives The coefficient ring is fixed; no parameter-changing automorphism is allowed in the comparison below. The displayed action is the matrix lattice of the source, expressed in its cellular basis; its fixed-parameter identification with the Krammer basis includes the stated sign translation, not a plain-module nonisomorphism claim.
The integers have no zero divisors (The integers have no zero divisors; multiplicative cancellation), polynomial extension preserves this property (A polynomial ring over an integral domain is an integral domain), and localization is the fraction construction of Multiplicative subsets and the localisation as equivalence classes of fractions. Localizing or at powers of the variables gives the Laurent domains and : the denominators are nonzero monomials, so clearing them preserves both equality and nonzero products.
Proof
The classes are -linearly independent. Extend the primed pairing of [F2] to by -sesquilinearity. Its matrix with respect to the dual classes is triangular with unit diagonal by [F2], hence invertible over and over . The pairing matrix for the actual absolute cycles is this primed matrix with each row multiplied by its displayed nonzero closing factor , , or . These factors are not asserted to be Laurent units; they are invertible over , so the actual matrix remains invertible over . If with , pairing the relation with each and applying invertibility gives for all . Since the lie in the image of and by [F1] that image spans a subspace of dimension , which equals the number of pairs , the classes form a -basis of .
The rational comparison and cyclic lattice. By [F4], and the Krammer matrix representation are isomorphic as -representations, and the latter has integral realization in the cellular kernel. The parameter match is explicit: set and . This is a diagonal Laurent-unit basis change. Substitution in the seven displayed cases gives the Krammer table: for the next-row coefficient becomes and the adjacent coefficient becomes ; for the adjacent exponent becomes ; in the interior it becomes ; for the previous-row coefficient becomes1; for the next-column coefficient remains; for an adjacent pair the eigenvalue is ; all other basis vectors are fixed. Thus the integral realization is the specified Krammer matrix lattice with exactly its frozen sign translation, not an unspecified rational basis change. The cycles have only one nonzero coordinate, namely in coordinate , so are independent. They are generated over by : the formula builds along the first row; the formula then builds row from row and its already known adjacent element. Induction gives every pair.
The classes span over . Let . By step 1.1 write with . Since is integral, [F3] gives for all . Hence is a -linear combination of the .
A fixed-parameter equivariant map cannot be surjective. For , the action of on has the eigenvalue on . Modulo this line, each span of , , has matrix with characteristic polynomial , and the remaining with are fixed. Since differs from as a rational function, its eigenspace is exactly . Any fixed-parameter -isomorphism from onto must therefore send to for . In integral cellular coordinates the and entries of this image are and . They belong to . Set and in . Then . Evaluate into the Laurent domain of [F5]: the factor is nonzero, so . The kernel of this evaluation is : multiply a Laurent polynomial by a sufficiently large power of , then use the finite identities to subtract its value at1. Hence for , and cancellation in gives . This proves the needed denominator removal directly, without asserting an undeclared UFD theorem. Cyclic generation from step 1.2 forces the entire image into .
Freeness and rank. A -linear relation with is in particular a -linear relation, so step 1.1 gives . Together with step 2.1 this shows that is a -basis of ; in particular the module is free of rank . The displayed relative images of the basis elements are exactly those recorded in [F2].
The integral kernel is strictly larger. Define Substituting [F1]'s absolute differential gives zero: the part contributes , The part is . Its coefficient inside the parentheses is and its coefficient is ; the coefficients are and . Thus it is the negative of the contribution. There are no degree-three boundaries, so . If it lay in , its coordinate would force its coefficient to equal , which is not in . Hence for every . Step 2.2 rules out an equivariant isomorphism onto . This proves the fixed-parameter nonisomorphism, including ; it does not rely on the source's stronger parameter-twisted maximality statement whose argument was left to the reader. Both underlying modules are free of the same rank, so are abstractly -isomorphic by sending one finite basis to the other.
The Lawrence-Krammer-Bigelow representation
Definition
Assume AC. Let be the closed unit disk, the puncture set in the standard configuration, the unordered two-point configuration space of with its basepoint , and the LKB cover with basepoint lift , deck group and coefficient ring (The two-point configuration space of a punctured disk, The Lawrence-Krammer-Bigelow cover).
By Braid group as boundary-fixed punctured-disk mapping classes the classical braid group is identified with the boundary-fixed mapping class group : homeomorphisms of fixing pointwise and preserving setwise, modulo isotopy relative to . Let and let be a representative. By Braids lift to the LKB cover and act Lambda-linearly there is a unique lift of to fixing ; it commutes with every deck transformation, and its induced automorphism is -linear and invertible. The assignment is independent of the representative and multiplicative, so it defines a homomorphism
The Lawrence-Krammer-Bigelow representation is this homomorphism composed with the matrix presentation of the target: fix once and for all the -basis of supplied for by The integral LKB module is free of rank n choose two. For the basis is empty and : the absolute cellular rank and localization injection of The absolute LKB cellular boundary and fraction-field rank give rank0 and therefore zero homology. They apply to the disk as well as the plane: choose a radial collar outside all punctures and compress its boundary strictly inward by a strictly increasing radius map fixed below the collar. Interpolating that map with the identity keeps every two-point configuration collision-free and gives inverse homotopies for interior inclusion. The homotopy preserves puncture and mutual winding characters; the moving basepoint is transported along its specified track. The open disk is orientation-preservingly radially homeomorphic to the plane, taking real punctures to real punctures in the same order. This transfers the absolute cover calculation. Define Thus is the action of on the absolute integral module ; the relative modules and the pairing are not used in its definition, and the Axiom of Choice is used exactly in the identification of with the boundary-fixed mapping class group, which supplies the normalized lifts above.
Two caveats are part of the definition. First, the target is the integral matrix group over ; by The integral LKB module is free of rank n choose two the basis is not related to Krammer's matrix basis by a -equivariant -isomorphism when , and only the fraction-field models are identified. Second, the normalization by the lift fixing is essential: replacing it by another lift multiplies by a deck transformation, i.e. by a monomial , so the matrix of below is the one computed from this fixed normalization.
An LKB kernel braid fixes every standard adjacent edge up to isotopy
Statement
Assume AC. Fix the standard configuration: punctures on the real axis of the disk , boundary points in the lower half-plane, standard edges for , and standard noodles winding around and no other puncture, crossing the real axis twice. If a boundary-fixed homeomorphism of represents an element of the kernel of , then for every the arc is isotopic relative to to ; in particular fixes each up to isotopy and preserves the labelling of the punctures.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: the standard configuration, the standard edges and standard noodles , each winding around and no other puncture; a homeomorphism fixing pointwise with and representing a class in .
For the proof use auxiliary singleton crosscuts with DISTINCT boundary endpoint pairs, not a pairwise-disjoint family of common-endpoint noodles. Join the lower boundary point to the real punctures by straight tethers; their interiors are disjoint and each meets the real axis only at its terminal puncture. In a small boundary half-disk fan out their initial germs to disjoint boundary intervals, in their cyclic order. Thin closed polygonal/circular neighborhoods of the resulting disjoint tethers are disks meeting in disjoint intervals, containing exactly . Choose the widths below the finitely many positive separations from the other tethers, punctures and nonincident . Their inner boundaries are pairwise disjoint proper crosscuts; misses and for . This is finite standard geometry. Bigelow's Figure 3 supplies individual singleton noodles, not the impossible common-endpoint disjointness assertion formerly used here.
(Basic Lemma; Bigelow 2001, Lemma 2.3.) A kernel braid preserves for every noodle and fork. Use the exact closed-first-argument identity of The fork-noodle pairing is well defined and equivariant: choose the closing neighborhoods for disjoint from both and , whose compact images avoid the punctures. Then is a closed replacement for the image fork, with its closing parts disjoint from . Since the kernel acts as identity on absolute , Cancel in the Laurent domain. No kernel action on the end-relative noodle class is presumed.
Fork detection transports to arbitrary boundary crosscuts detects disjoinability of the tine from by the exact absolute/end-stable pairing . A kernel element fixes , so also fixes this scalar pairing, for every ; this uses no kernel action on the second class. Closing neighborhoods can be chosen to miss and , as in [F2].
Minimal-position representatives and the arc bigon criterion, proof 2.1–4.1, gives simultaneous disjoining from a finite DISJOINT family of proper crosscuts when each is individually disjoinable. Its clean bigon moves are ambient and fix . Under AC, Jordan–Schönflies extension for plane curves also supplies the finite relative graph/face construction for a disk and an embedded arc; this extends a prescribed arc map while fixing the outer boundary and the marked endpoint vertices. The construction is the relative graph/face construction in the minimal-position supplier and its declared general-arc prerequisite.
For one has by the Artin presentation, and is free of rank one by The integral LKB module is free of rank n choose two; the standard generator acts on it by the unit (Bigelow 2001, Theorem 4.1, case in the source's parameter). Hence , which is the identity only for , because in forces .
Proof
For , [F5] forces a kernel braid to be the identity class, proving both edge fixing and label preservation. For , the braid group is trivial and there are no edges. Hence assume . Fix and a standard fork with tine . For each , choose its closing neighborhoods small enough to miss ; its compact replacement pairs to zero with because the tine is disjoint and the closing pieces also miss the crosscut. The kernel fixes that absolute class. The image replacement therefore still pairs to zero; [F3] makes individually disjoinable from each . By [F4] isotope this one arc simultaneously off all those crosscuts. No previously arranged edge is invoked or trimmed.
Each separates a disk containing only from all other punctures. A connected arc disjoint from it whose two distinct ends are punctures cannot have an end : otherwise the entire arc would lie in that component and there would be no possible second puncture end. Consequently The disjoined arc lies in the remaining closed disk obtained by removing the interiors of the caps for , with their crosscut boundaries retained. This disk has exactly two marked interior points and also contains .
In a disk with exactly two marked interior points, every simple arc joining them is isotopic, as an unoriented image, to any other. Here is the relative construction rather than a simply-connectedness assertion about the punctured disk. Extend each such arc by two access arcs to distinct boundary points, yielding a crosscut and an outer-circle graph. Prescribe the target graph map to the corresponding graph for the original arc, fixing the outer boundary and taking the two ordered marked vertices to themselves; relative Schoenflies on the Jordan faces extends it to an orientation-preserving marked disk homeomorphism . The two-point mapping-class theorem identifies with a power of its standard half twist, because . That half twist has a representative supported around the target arc and preserves its image. Thus an isotopy from to that representative applied to the target arc takes the original image to the target image, with both marked points fixed during the isotopy whenever fixes them: its power is then even. Extend the isotopy of by identity over the removed caps, since it fixes . This proves relative to all of .
Repeat the independent argument for every , obtaining both its edge image class and its unordered endpoint pair. The pairs for intersect in the singleton , so their preserved images force and then , . Each subsequent pair forces the next puncture fixed. Thus every label is preserved. Once this is known, the edge isotopies in step 2.1 may also be parametrized from to : any final increasing interval reparametrization is corrected by . The lemma claims the individual edge classes; simultaneous pointwise spine fixing is proved by its separate boundary-twist consumer.
The full boundary twist acts on LKB by the scalar q to two n t squared
Statement
Assume AC. Let be the full twist of and let be the representation of The Lawrence-Krammer-Bigelow representation. Then the normalized lift of acts on the absolute module by the scalar : For , the scalar equals the identity of only for . Equivalently, in Krammer's fraction-field model with basis one has , and applying this identity twice multiplies every basis element by . For the absolute module is zero and every scalar induces its identity; the detection clause is not asserted in that rank.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: the full twist of , the representation of The Lawrence-Krammer-Bigelow representation, and the Krammer fraction-field model of Krammer's seven-case formula (Krammer 2002, Section 3).
(Krammer 2002, Lemma 3.2.) In the fraction-field model over one has for all .
The integral LKB module is free of rank n choose two together with Bigelow 2002, Section 4.2: the natural map is injective, and there is a -module isomorphism after extending scalars; the two integral lattices are not identified.
Bigelow 2001, Section 3.2 (final paragraph) records the geometric check and in the source's sign convention, exhibiting the same scalar .
Proof
For the representation definition supplies the zero absolute module; all stated action identities hold there, without detecting any exponent. For the remaining proof assume . The scalar identity in the fraction-field model. Fix and write , , so that and the assignment is an involution of the set of pairs. Applying [F1] to the pair gives ; applying [F1] to the pair gives , because the pair associated with is again . Combining the two identities, since , so . As runs over all pairs, every basis element of the fraction-field model is an eigenvector of with eigenvalue , so , a matrix identity whose entries lie in .
Transfer to the absolute integral module. By [F2] the scalar extension is isomorphic to as a -module, and the isomorphism intertwines the two actions of . Hence step 1.1 shows that acts on by the scalar . Let . The normalized lift of gives because the action preserves the integral lattice, and by definition of the scalar extension its image in equals times the image of . Both classes lie in the image of the integral lattice, and the natural map is injective by [F2]; therefore already in . As was arbitrary, .
Powers and nontriviality. Multiplying the scalar identity, for every one has ; the same identity with follows by inverting the scalar , and inverting again gives the stated formula for every . Since , the free module has a nonzero basis vector. If were the identity matrix, equality on that vector would imply the two Laurent monomials and would be equal in ; distinct monomials with distinct exponent vectors are distinct elements of , so and .
The Bigelow sign convention. The source's geometric computation [F3] exhibits the eigenvalue of on the class of the standard -fork as a unit multiple of ; the two computations agree on the scalar and differ only in the fixed unit contributed by the normalization of the pairing, which is immaterial for the matrix identity above.
A mapping class fixing all standard adjacent edges is a boundary twist power
Statement
Assume AC. If a boundary-fixed mapping class of the -times punctured disk preserves every marked puncture label and fixes each standard adjacent edge up to isotopy relative to , then it is isotopic to for some , where is the full twist, that is, the Dehn twist about a curve parallel to .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: the standard disk with punctures on the real axis, the standard edges , a homeomorphism of fixing and every point of pointwise, and, for each , an isotopy of to relative to .
Homotopic simple proper arcs in the punctured disk are isotopic relative to their endpoints supplies relative graph/face smoothing, finite transverse position, compact actual-cover bigons, endpoint sectors and their ambient realizations. Jordan–Schönflies extension for plane curves supplies the relative disk extensions; Alexander contraction of the boundary-fixed disk homeomorphism group supplies their supported isotopies. All marked endpoints are filled points in these constructions.
The compatible graph induction of Farb–Margalit, Lemma 2.9 and Proposition 2.8, printed pp. 62–66, applies to compact marked surfaces and proper arcs. Its proof is used explicitly below: bigon and last-region moves preserve the previously arranged graph, and oriented edges may then be fixed pointwise. This is not an application of smooth extension to arcs whose endpoints fail its boundary-endpoint hypothesis.
The boundary-fixed mapping classes of a compact annulus are generated by its full twist. The proof is recalled in step 3.1, using [F1]'s disk bigon moves and Alexander contraction; it does not classify the uncompleted open slit complement as a closed annulus.
(Bigelow 2001, end of Section 3.2; Garside half twist The Garside half twist and simple positive braids.) The class in of the Dehn twist about a curve parallel to is the full twist of , under the identification of the classical braid group with the boundary-fixed mapping class group.
Proof
For , the disk mapping-class theorem gives the trivial group and the assertion holds with . Assume ; purity is a hypothesis, so every edge has its two marked endpoints fixed individually. Apply the compatible graph induction of [F2] to the two chains and . Here all distinct edge interiors are disjoint, distinct edges have distinct endpoint pairs, and no triple intersects; the only shared vertices are the prescribed marked points. At the induction stage the preceding chain is already arranged. The relative graph/face construction of [F1] puts the next two arcs in finite transverse position, separating their endpoint germs in sectors consistent with the cyclic order of the chain, and retaining the preceding chain as a graph. The relative homotopy between the two next arcs yields ordinary bigons or marked-endpoint sectors by [F1]'s actual-cover argument. A prior graph edge entering an ordinary bigon must join its two opposite sides: a return to one side would itself bound a removable bigon against that side, contrary to the already minimal position of each of the two original disjoint chains. At a shared marked corner retain the prior germ and use the sector not containing that germ. The same return reduction supplies a smaller ordinary bigon if necessary. Thus the portions of the preceding graph in a reduction disk are disjoint through-arcs.
Subdivide a reduction disk along those through-arcs. Prescribe the push of the new arc across it, carrying each through-arc to itself as a set and fixing all graph vertices. Extend the prescription over the resulting Jordan disk faces using [F1]; the supported Alexander moves realize it while preserving the preceding graph. Each push removes an intersection; the final disk region between the two disjoint isotopic arcs is treated by exactly the same subdivision. It contains no other marked point, since the relative homotopy has zero winding about each other mark. The finite induction therefore gives a representative preserving every edge as a set and fixing every marked point. Each restriction to the full straight spine is an increasing interval homeomorphism fixing its marked vertices. In a narrow rectangle about , extend increasingly by the identity past the two endpoints and set where on and vanishes near the top and bottom of the rectangle. This is an isotopy of rectangle homeomorphisms, fixed on its boundary and at each marked vertex, extended by identity outside. Its final composition with fixes pointwise. Only the preservation of the prior graph as a set was required in the induction; the final interval correction fixes all of it pointwise.
For completeness, the compact annulus classification in [F3] is relative to BOTH boundary circles. Lift a boundary-fixed annulus homeomorphism to the strip with its lower boundary fixed. Its upper boundary is for a unique integer (using angular period one). Compose with the inverse -twist. The image of a supplied radial arc then has the same lifted endpoints as that radial arc, so is relatively homotopic to it. The disk-cover bigon moves of [F1] isotope it to that arc, fixing both boundary circles; the increasing parametrization correction fixes it pointwise. Cutting along it gives a compact rectangle, whose boundary is now fixed. The Alexander contraction on that disk shows that the residual annulus map is isotopic to identity relative to both circles. Reglue the fixed shores; compact quotient continuity gives the annulus isotopy. This proves the stated integer classification.
Complete the slit complement accurately. By an orientation-preserving affine change write the straight spine as about its center (the outer boundary becomes a circle with possibly different center). The Joukowski map maps homeomorphically to the plane minus this segment: its quadratic inverse has exactly one root of modulus greater than one, and there. Write the outer circle as , with real . Along set ; then . This upward quadratic is below at , because the entire spine is strictly inside the disk, and tends to infinity. It therefore has exactly one root , depending continuously on , and gives a continuous radial graph . The region is explicitly a compact annulus , parametrized by . On its inner boundary , identifying the two shores and giving one preimage at each terminal tip. Its quotient is the FILLED disk ; removing the marked images recovers the punctured disk. The homeomorphism fixing pointwise extends to a homeomorphism of fixing both boundary components pointwise. At an interior spine point it preserves the two local sides, since it is orientation preserving and fixes the oriented interval; a side swap would reverse the cyclic orientation of a small transverse disk. Uniform continuity on the filled disk then sends approaching points on either shore to that same shore point. At either terminal tip there is only one inner-boundary preimage, so the same compactness argument gives continuity there. Apply this also to to obtain a homeomorphism, not merely a continuous extension.
By step 1.3 isotope that extension, on the COMPACT annulus and relative to both boundary circles, to the -twist. Every map in this isotopy fixes every inner-boundary point, hence respects the shore identifications. The quotient map is a closed quotient map (compact source and Hausdorff target), so the descended family is jointly continuous, including the slit and both tips. Its inverse family descends likewise. Thus it is a filled-disk isotopy fixing , and hence all marked points. Its twist curve is parallel to the outer boundary. By [F4] that twist is , proving . No arbitrary punctured-space homotopy was extended to a tip; the isotopy was compact and boundary fixed before descent.
Remarks
The label hypothesis is essential at rank two: a half twist preserves the unoriented image of the sole edge but exchanges its two marked endpoints and is not a full-twist power. For preservation of all consecutive unordered endpoint pairs already implies purity. The kernel-edge supplier gives label preservation for every rank, so the hypothesis correction preserves the full LKB faithfulness conclusion.
The Lawrence-Krammer-Bigelow representation is faithful
Statement
Assume AC. The representation of The Lawrence-Krammer-Bigelow representation is faithful for every : if a boundary-fixed homeomorphism represents an element of the kernel, then is isotopic relative to to for some . For the scalar value forces ; for , is trivial.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: the standard disk with punctures and standard edges ; a homeomorphism of fixing pointwise and representing an element of .
An LKB kernel braid fixes every standard adjacent edge up to isotopy: is isotopic to relative to for every , and preserves the labelling of the punctures.
A mapping class fixing all standard adjacent edges is a boundary twist power: a label-preserving boundary-fixed mapping class fixing each up to isotopy relative to is isotopic to for some .
The full boundary twist acts on LKB by the scalar q to two n t squared: , and for this scalar acts as the identity only for .
For the group is trivial by the Artin presentation, so every representation of is faithful.
Proof
Assume and let . By [F1] the representative preserves each marked label and fixes each standard edge up to isotopy, so [F2] produces with isotopic relative to to . Since only depends on the isotopy class relative to , by [F3].
Since lies in the kernel, the scalar in step 1.1 is the identity; by [F3] this forces . Hence is isotopic relative to to the identity, so it represents the trivial element of . Therefore is trivial and is faithful for . For the claim is immediate by [F4].
Every classical braid group is linear
Statement
Assume AC. For every the representation embeds into , hence also into ; therefore every classical braid group is linear.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: the braid group , the ring and its fraction field .
The Lawrence-Krammer-Bigelow representation is faithful: has trivial kernel.
The integral LKB module is free of rank n choose two: the target is the full matrix group of the free -module of rank , and extension of scalars to presents it as .
Proof
By [F1] the homomorphism is injective, so is isomorphic to a subgroup of the matrix group ; this already exhibits a faithful finite-dimensional representation of over the commutative ring .
Extending scalars along the inclusion gives a group homomorphism which is injective, because its entries are the entries of the matrix and the inclusion is injective; the composite with is therefore an injective homomorphism from to . By [F2] the size is finite for every , so is a linear group. For the group is trivial and therefore linear as well.
5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements
None yet.
Sources
- Bigelow, Braid groups are linear, J. Amer. Math. Soc. 14 (2001) 471-486
- Bigelow, The Lawrence-Krammer representation, arXiv:math/0204057v1
- Farb and Margalit, A Primer on Mapping Class Groups, version 5.0 author draft
- Bigelow, The Lawrence-Krammer representation, section 2.2, collision and puncture end neighbourhoods
- Salvetti, Topology of the complement of real hyperplanes, Part One and Theorem 1, pp.604–611
- Paoluzzi and Paris, A note on the Lawrence–Krammer–Bigelow representation, section 2, pp.503–506
- Paoluzzi and Paris, A note on the Lawrence–Krammer–Bigelow representation, section 3, pp.507–509
- Bigelow, The Lawrence-Krammer representation, Lemma 4.2
- Paoluzzi and Paris, A note on the Lawrence–Krammer–Bigelow representation, sections 2–3
- Bigelow, The Lawrence-Krammer representation, proof of Lemma 4.4
- Paoluzzi and Paris, A note on the Lawrence-Krammer-Bigelow representation, Algebr. Geom. Topol. 2 (2002) 499-518
- Bigelow, Braid groups are linear, JAMS 14 (2001) 471–486; local boundary transport derived here
- Krammer, Braid groups are linear, Ann. of Math. 155 (2002) 131-156
- Alexander, On the deformation of an n-cell (as used by Bigelow 2001, Section 3.2)