Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Borel Weil and Borel Weil Bott — Examples

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

These examples compute Borel-Weil-Bott in the smallest ranks. On the projective line for SL2 the line bundles Lmω1 are the twists O(m), and the three regimes are displayed: global sections for m≥0; vanishing of sections with degree-one cohomology realising the dual irreducible for m≤−2; and total vanishing at the singular wall m=−1.

The sl3 examples exhibit higher degree: a weight whose unique nonvanishing cohomology sits in degree one and realises the eight-dimensional module L(ρ)∗≅L(ρ), and the top-degree case λ=−3ρ, where the Serre pairing against H0(Lρ) is perfect and both sides are eight-dimensional.

The counterexample records a convention trap rather than a mathematical alternative: replacing C−λ by C+λ in the associated bundle dualises the line bundle. For λ=mω1 with m>0 on the projective line, this changes its sections from the nonzero module L(mω1)∗ to zero; it does not dualise the section space.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

None yet.

5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedOpen item page →

The sl2 singular weight has no cohomology

Example

Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). For G=SL2(C) the weight λ=−ρ=−ω1 has λ+ρ=0 on the Weyl wall, and L−ω1≅O(−1) on X≅P1. All cohomology of L−ω1 vanishes: H0(X,L−ω1)=H1(X,L−ω1)=0. More generally the wall-crossing isomorphism Hi(X,L−ω1)≅Hi+1(X,L−ω1) of Rank-one cohomology shifts across a simple wall together with the vanishing above degree 1 forces every cohomology group to vanish.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Choice, G=SL2(C), its upper triangular Borel, the flag variety X=G/B≅P1, the fundamental weight ω1 and Weyl vector ρ=ω1, the simple root α with reflection s, and the bundle L−ω1.

[F1]

In rank one α=2ω1 and ρ=α/2=ω1. Thus for λ=−ω1 one has λ+ρ=0, s⋅λ=s(0)−ρ=−ω1, and ⟨λ,α∨⟩=−1. The shifted weight is therefore not regular (Fundamental weights for a chosen simple root system, The Weyl vector, Rank-one cohomology shifts across a simple wall).

[F2]

For G=SL2 the unique simple root α has Pα=G, so the fibre F=Pα/B is all of X=G/B, and under the fixed identification of the fibre with the two-affine projective line P1 the restriction Lλ∣F is isomorphic to OP1(⟨λ,α∨⟩); in particular L−ω1≅O(−1) (A minimal-parabolic flag projection is a projective-line bundle, Flag line-bundle degree on a minimal-parabolic fiber, Two-affine projective line and its twists).

[F3]

On P1 over C one has Hq(O(d))=0 unless q=0 or q=1; H0(O(d))=0 for d<0, and H1(O(d)) is nonzero exactly for d≤−2. In particular at d=−1 both H0 and H1 vanish (Cohomology of O(d) on projective space).

[F4]

The wall-crossing isomorphism: since the pairing is −1, Hi(X,L−ω1)≅Hi+1(X,Ls⋅(−ω1))=Hi+1(X,L−ω1) for all i≥0; and all cohomology vanishes by the singular-weight lemma (Rank-one cohomology shifts across a simple wall, Singular dot weights have zero line-bundle cohomology, The Borel-Weil-Bott theorem).

[F5]

X is smooth projective of dimension 1, so Hq(X,L−ω1)=0 for q>1 (Serre duality for locally free sheaves on a smooth projective variety).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1F2F3F5

By [F2] the bundle is O(−1), so [F3] gives H0(X,L−ω1)=H1(X,L−ω1)=0 and Hq=0 for q>1.

2.1F4F5step 1.1

The consistency argument is independent of the table: [F4] gives Hi≅Hi+1 for all i≥0, while Hq=0 for q>1 by [F5]; starting from H2=0 gives H1≅H2=0 and then H0≅H1=0.

3.1F1step 1.1step 2.1∎

Both computations agree: for λ=−ω1, the shifted weight λ+ρ=0 lies on the Weyl wall (the boundary value n=−1 of the rank-one shift), and all cohomology of Lλ vanishes, as asserted.

ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

Borel-Weil-Bott on the projective line for SL2

Example

Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let G=SL2(C) with upper triangular Borel B and flag variety X=G/B≅P1, and for m∈Z let Lmω1=G×BC−mω1≅O(m) be the line bundles identified by Flag line-bundle degree on a minimal-parabolic fiber in the rank-one case. Write L(kω1) for the finite-dimensional irreducible sl2-module of highest weight kω1, for k≥0. Then: (i) for m≥0, H0(X,Lmω1)≅L(mω1)∗ and H1(X,Lmω1)=0; (ii) for m≤−2, H1(X,Lmω1)≅L((−m−2)ω1)∗ and H0(X,Lmω1)=0; (iii) for m=−1, H0(X,L−ω1)=H1(X,L−ω1)=0. The Borel-Weil-Bott degree is 0 for m≥0, 1 for m≤−2, and the weight mω1 is dot-singular exactly for m=−1.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Choice, G=SL2(C) with upper triangular Borel, X=G/B≅P1, the fundamental weight ω1, ρ=ω1, the simple reflection s, and the bundles Lmω1 for m∈Z.

[F1]

Borel-Weil-Bott: if ν+ρ is singular all cohomology of Lν vanishes, and if ν+ρ is regular with Weyl element v, then Hℓ(v)(X,Lν)≅L(v⋅ν)∗ and all other cohomology vanishes (The Borel-Weil-Bott theorem).

[F2]

In rank one ρ=ω1, so mω1+ρ=(m+1)ω1 is regular exactly for m≠−1; for m≥0 the Weyl element is v=1 with 1⋅(mω1)=mω1, while for m≤−2 the Weyl element is s and s(λ+ρ)−ρ with λ=mω1 equals −(m+2)ω1: indeed s((m+1)ω1)=−(m+1)ω1, so s⋅(mω1)=−(m+1)ω1−ω1=−(m+2)ω1 (Fundamental weights for a chosen simple root system, The Weyl vector, Length and longest Weyl-group element).

[F3]

For G=SL2 the unique simple root α has Pα=G, so the minimal parabolic fibre is all of X=G/B, and under the fixed identification of X with P1 the bundle Lmω1 restricts to O(m) by the degree computation ⟨mω1,α∨⟩=m; the singular boundary case m=−1 has all cohomology vanishing (A minimal-parabolic flag projection is a projective-line bundle, Minimal parabolic from one negative simple root, Flag line-bundle degree on a minimal-parabolic fiber, Two-affine projective line and its twists, The sl2 singular weight has no cohomology).

[F4]

On P1 over C: H0(O(m)) has dimension m+1 for m≥0 and vanishes for m<0; H1(O(m)) vanishes for m≥−1 and has dimension −m−1 for m≤−2; all other cohomology vanishes (Cohomology of O(d) on projective space). The Weyl dimension formula for sl2, whose single positive root pairs with ρ by 1, gives dim⁡L(kω1)=k+1 for k≥0 (The Weyl dimension formula).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1F1F2F4given

Case m≥0: the weight mω1 is dominant and mω1+ρ is regular with Weyl element 1 by [F2], so [F1] gives H0(X,Lmω1)≅L(mω1)∗ and H1(X,Lmω1)=0. This matches the dimensions of [F4], since dim⁡L(mω1)∗=m+1=dim⁡H0(O(m)).

1.2F1F2F4given

Case m≤−2: mω1+ρ=(m+1)ω1 is regular and the Weyl element is s with s⋅(mω1)=−(m+2)ω1, which is dominant because −m−2≥0; by [F1], H1(X,Lmω1)≅L((−m−2)ω1)∗ and all other cohomology vanishes, in particular H0=0. The dimensions match those of [F4] because dim⁡L((−m−2)ω1)∗=−m−1=dim⁡H1(O(m)).

1.3F3given

Case m=−1: the weight (−1)ω1=−ρ has mω1+ρ=0 singular, and by [F3] all cohomology of L−ω1 vanishes, so H0=H1=0.

2.1step 1.1step 1.2step 1.3given∎

The three cases are exhaustive and mω1+ρ=(m+1)ω1 is singular exactly for m=−1; collecting steps 1.1-1.3 gives the asserted Borel-Weil-Bott description on the projective line, with degree 0 for m≥0 and degree 1 for m≤−2.

ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

An sl3 weight with cohomology in degree one

Example

Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let G=SL3(C) with standard Borel, simple roots α1,α2, fundamental weights ω1,ω2 and ρ=ω1+ω2, and put λ=s1⋅ρ=ρ−2α1=−3ω1+3ω2. Then λ+ρ=s1(2ρ) is regular with Weyl element w=s1 and s1⋅λ=ρ, so The Borel-Weil-Bott theorem gives H1(X,Lλ)≅L(ρ)∗ and Hi(X,Lλ)=0 for i≠1. Since L(ρ) is eight-dimensional by the Weyl dimension formula, H1 is eight-dimensional and the Euler-characteristic formula reads ch H0−ch H1=−ch L(ρ).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Choice, g=sl3(C) with standard Cartan and Borel, simple roots α1,α2, fundamental weights ω1,ω2, ρ=ω1+ω2, the simple reflection s1, the longest element w0 of the Weyl group, and λ=s1⋅ρ=ρ−2α1=−3ω1+3ω2.

[F1]

In A2 the simple roots are α1,α2, the positive roots are α1,α2,α1+α2, and ρ=ω1+ω2 satisfies ⟨ρ,αi∨⟩=1; the simple reflection acts by s1(ν)=ν−⟨ν,α1∨⟩α1, and the dot action is w⋅ν=w(ν+ρ)−ρ with ℓ(s1)=1 (Classical complex matrix Lie algebras, Root systems of the classical complex Lie algebras, Fundamental weights for a chosen simple root system, The Weyl vector in fundamental coordinates, The Weyl vector, Root reflections and the Weyl group action).

[F2]

Borel-Weil-Bott: if ν+ρ is regular with Weyl element v, then Hℓ(v)(X,Lν)≅L(v⋅ν)∗ and all other cohomology vanishes (The Borel-Weil-Bott theorem).

[F3]

The Weyl dimension formula gives dim⁡L(ρ)=∏β∈Φ+(2ρ,β)/(ρ,β)=2∣Φ+∣=23=8, since (2ρ,β)=2(ρ,β) and (ρ,β)>0 for the three positive roots; in particular H1≅L(ρ)∗ is eight-dimensional (The Weyl dimension formula, Root systems of the classical complex Lie algebras, The Weyl vector in fundamental coordinates).

[F4]

Euler-characteristic form of Borel-Weil-Bott: ∑i(−1)ich Hi(X,Lν)=(−1)ℓ(v)ch L(v⋅ν)∗ when ν+ρ is regular with Weyl element v (The Borel-Weil-Bott Euler character is a signed dual Weyl character).

[F5]

For a dominant integral weight ν the dual L(ν)∗ is irreducible of highest weight −w0ν; since w0 maps Φ+ onto Φ−, it sends 2ρ=∑α>0α to −2ρ, so w0ρ=−ρ and −w0ρ=ρ, hence L(ρ)∗ is irreducible of highest weight ρ and therefore L(ρ)∗≅L(ρ) by the classification of finite-dimensional irreducibles, with ch L(ρ)∗=ch L(ρ) (Highest weight of the dual representation, Length and longest Weyl-group element, Highest-weight classification).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1F1givenalgebra

Compute in A2: λ=s1⋅ρ=s1(2ρ)−ρ=2ρ−2α1−ρ=ρ−2α1 by [F1] and ⟨ρ,α1∨⟩=1. Since ρ=ω1+ω2 and α1=2ω1−ω2 (the A2 Cartan entry is ⟨α1,α2∨⟩=−1, read off from the ε-coordinates of [F1], so α1=⟨α1,α1∨⟩ω1+⟨α1,α2∨⟩ω2), this is ω1+ω2−4ω1+2ω2=−3ω1+3ω2. Moreover λ+ρ=s1(2ρ), which is regular because 2ρ is regular and W preserves regularity, and s1⋅λ=s1(λ+ρ)−ρ=2ρ−ρ=ρ, so the Weyl element is w=s1 with ℓ(w)=1.

2.1F2F3step 1.1

By [F2] applied to λ and step 1.1, H1(X,Lλ)≅L(ρ)∗ and Hi(X,Lλ)=0 for i≠1; by [F3] this group is eight-dimensional.

3.1F4F5step 2.1algebra

The Euler-characteristic formula of [F4] at this weight reads ch H0−ch H1=(−1)1ch L(ρ)∗=−ch L(ρ)∗, and by [F5] L(ρ)∗≅L(ρ), so this equals −ch L(ρ); since H0=0 by step 2.1 the formula is precisely the alternating class of the group H1≅L(ρ)∗.

4.1step 1.1step 2.1step 3.1∎

Steps 1.1-3.1 give a weight whose cohomology is concentrated in degree one with H1≅L(ρ)∗≅L(ρ) of dimension eight and whose Euler characteristic is −ch L(ρ), as asserted.

ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

The top-degree Borel-Weil-Bott case and Serre duality

Example

Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let G=SL3(C) with ρ=ω1+ω2, let N=3=∣Φ+∣ and put λ=w0⋅ρ=−3ρ, so that λ+ρ=−2ρ is regular with Weyl element w0 and w0⋅λ=ρ. Then The Borel-Weil-Bott theorem gives H3(X,L−3ρ)≅L(ρ)∗,Hi(X,L−3ρ)=0 (i≠3), and the Serre pairing H3(X,L−3ρ)×H0(X,Lρ)⟶H3(X,KX)≅C is perfect; both sides are eight-dimensional. This is the w=w0, top-degree case of Borel-Weil-Bott is compatible with Serre duality with μ=−λ−2ρ=ρ and u=w0w0=1.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Choice, g=sl3(C) with its standard Cartan, simple roots α1,α2, fundamental weights ω1,ω2, ρ=ω1+ω2, the flag variety X=G/B of dimension N=3, the longest element w0 and the weight λ=−3ρ.

[F1]

In A2 the simple roots are α1,α2, the positive roots are α1,α2,α1+α2, and the Weyl vector is ρ=ω1+ω2 with ⟨ρ,αi∨⟩=1; the longest element satisfies w0Φ+=Φ−, hence w0ρ=−ρ, and ℓ(w0)=N=3=∣Φ+∣, while the dot action is w⋅ν=w(ν+ρ)−ρ (Classical complex matrix Lie algebras, Root systems of the classical complex Lie algebras, Fundamental weights for a chosen simple root system, The Weyl vector in fundamental coordinates, The Weyl vector, Length and longest Weyl-group element).

[F2]

Borel-Weil-Bott: for regular ν+ρ with Weyl element v, Hℓ(v)(X,Lν)≅L(v⋅ν)∗ and all other cohomology vanishes (The Borel-Weil-Bott theorem).

[F3]

Compatibility with Serre duality: for regular λ with Weyl element w and μ=−λ−2ρ, the Weyl element of μ is w0w and the Serre pairing identifies Hℓ(w)(X,Lλ)∨ with HN−ℓ(w)(X,Lμ), matching L(w⋅λ)∗ with L(w⋅λ) (Borel-Weil-Bott is compatible with Serre duality).

[F4]

ωX=KX≅L−2ρ and Serre duality gives a perfect pairing H3(X,L−3ρ)×H0(X,Lρ)→H3(X,KX)≅C; moreover dim⁡L(ρ)=8: the Weyl dimension formula is dim⁡L(ρ)=∏β∈Φ+(2ρ,β)/(ρ,β)=2∣Φ+∣=23, since (2ρ,β)=2(ρ,β) and (ρ,β)>0 for the three positive roots (Canonical weight of a flag variety, Serre duality for locally free sheaves on a smooth projective variety, The Weyl dimension formula, Root systems of the classical complex Lie algebras, The Weyl vector in fundamental coordinates).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1F1givenalgebra

By [F1], λ=w0⋅ρ=w0(2ρ)−ρ=−2ρ−ρ=−3ρ; then λ+ρ=−2ρ, and w0(λ+ρ)=2ρ is dominant, so the Weyl element of λ is w=w0 with ℓ(w)=3=N, while w0⋅λ=w0(−2ρ)−ρ=2ρ−ρ=ρ.

2.1F2step 1.1

Applying [F2] to λ by step 1.1 gives H3(X,L−3ρ)≅L(ρ)∗ and Hi(X,L−3ρ)=0 for i≠3.

3.1F3F4step 1.1step 2.1algebra

For the pairing, μ=−λ−2ρ=3ρ−2ρ=ρ and u=w0w=w0w0=1 with ℓ(u)=0=N−3, so [F3] identifies H3(X,L−3ρ)∨ with H0(X,Lρ) and matches its two sides as L(ρ)∗ and L(ρ); [F4] supplies the perfect Serre pairing to H3(X,KX)≅C. Both L(ρ) and its dual are eight-dimensional by [F4], so both sides of the pairing are eight-dimensional.

4.1step 2.1step 3.1∎

Collecting steps 2.1 and 3.1 gives the asserted top-degree Borel-Weil-Bott computation and the perfect eight-dimensional Serre pairing.

CounterexampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

Changing the line-bundle sign changes the Borel-Weil section space

Statement refuted

The false statement is that the two sign conventions Lλ=G×BC−λ and L~λ=G×BC+λ give the same Borel-Weil answer, so that replacing C−λ by C+λ in the construction of the line bundle is harmless.

Counterexample

Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let G=SL2(C) and consider the two bundles attached to mω1∈X∗(T): the library convention Lmω1=G×BC−mω1≅O(m) of The equivariant line bundle associated to a Borel character and the opposite convention L~mω1=G×BC+mω1≅L−mω1≅O(−m). For m>0 the reader who silently replaces C−λ by C+λ gets H0(X,L~mω1)=H0(X,O(−m))=0instead ofH0(X,Lmω1)≅L(mω1)∗≠0, so the opposite convention gives zero sections where the library convention gives a nonzero irreducible module. The line bundle is dualized by the sign change, but its space of sections is not obtained by dualizing the original space of sections. The two conventions are not interchangeable.

Given: The Axiom of Choice, G=SL2(C) with upper triangular Borel and flag variety X=G/B≅P1, an integer m>0, the fundamental weight ω1, the library bundles Lmω1=G×BC−mω1, and the opposite bundles L~mω1=G×BC+mω1.

1.1givenalgebra

By definition of the sign convention, G×BC+λ is G×BC−(−λ)=L−λ; hence L~mω1=L−mω1, and for SL2 the fibre is all of X with the restriction of L−mω1 isomorphic to O(−m) by the degree computation for the minimal parabolic fibre under the fixed identification of X with P1.

2.1step 1.1algebra

For m>0 the twist O(−m) has negative degree, so it has no nonzero global sections by the projective-space cohomology computation Cohomology of O(d) on projective space; in particular H0(X,L~mω1)=0.

3.1givenstep 2.1∎

On the other hand mω1 is dominant integral, so the Borel-Weil theorem The Borel-Weil theorem gives H0(X,Lmω1)≅L(mω1)∗, which is nonzero because an irreducible representation has a nonzero highest weight vector. Thus the two conventions answer differently: the sign change replaces the dual irreducible representation by zero, and the two constructions are not interchangeable.

Sources