Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

✓ 1 result · all verified · 0 also independently AI-judged
Every result on this page is machine-checked by a proof checker and read in full and owner-audited; the judge is an additional, independent cross-model AI review of the proofs. The 1 not AI-judged were verified by owner audit (typically over a confirmed judge false positive), not failures.

Spectral measures and periodogram bias — Examples

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

An explicit weakly stationary sinusoid has an atomic spectrum, while a causal AR(1) process with ∣ρ∣<1 has a continuous spectral density. Their expected periodograms are the corresponding Fejér averages: two shifted kernels in the atomic case and a convolution against a continuous density in the AR(1) case.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

None yet.

5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passOpen item page →

An atomic sinusoid and an AR(1) process have different spectra

Example

Use the finite uniform space Ω={−1,1}2 for the sinusoid model, and use the probability space carrying (εt)t∈Z for the AR(1) model. Both models have exact expected-periodogram formulas but different types of spectral measure. The first has two atoms and no spectral density. The second is an AR(1) process whose one-sided innovation series is shown below to converge almost surely and in L2; this is its causal representation using only current and past innovations, and it has a continuous spectral density. No raw-periodogram limit distribution is asserted.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A parameter v>0, a frequency λs∈(0,π), a two-sided IID sequence (εt)t∈Z of centered real random variables with variance σ2≥0, a parameter ρ∈(−1,1), the Axiom of Choice, and Dependent Choice.

[F1]

Finite probability spaces, outcome weights, events, and event probabilities: on a finite outcome set, uniform weights 1/∣Ω∣ define a probability space and event probabilities by finite sums.

[F2]

Expectation of a real random variable on a finite probability space: expectation on a finite probability space is the finite weighted sum.

[F3]

Variance, standard deviation, and covariance on a finite probability space: variance and covariance are expectations of centered squares and products.

[F4]

Identical distribution and IID families: IID means mutual independence and a common marginal law.

[F5]

Expectation factors over a finite product of mutually independent random variables: for a finite independent family of integrable real variables, the expectation of their product is the product of their expectations.

[F6]

Riesz-Fischer completeness of Lp for 1≤p≤∞: assuming the Axiom of Choice, L2 of a measure space is complete.

[F7]

Cauchy-Schwarz for random variables: if Y,Z∈L2, then E[∣YZ∣]≤∥Y∥2∥Z∥2.

[F8]

Linearity, monotonicity, and the modulus bound for expectation: expectation is linear on integrable real or complex random variables, and ∣E[Y]∣≤E[∣Y∣].

[F9]

Moments, variance, and covariance on a probability space: the variance of a square-integrable real variable is the expectation of its centered square.

[F10]

Strict and weak stationarity for integer-indexed time series and Autocovariance and sample autocovariance: weak stationarity means finite second moments, a constant mean, and γ(h)=Cov⁡(Xt+h,Xt) independent of t.

[F11]

Spectral measures and the known-mean periodogram: a spectral measure represents the autocovariance by γ(h)=∫TeihλF(dλ).

[F12]

Herglotz spectral measure and the summable-covariance density: under AC and DC, an absolutely summable autocovariance has spectral density f(λ)=(2π)−1∑hγ(h)e−ihλ.

[F13]

Expected periodogram and smoothed spectral-density bias: given a spectral measure F, the known-mean periodogram satisfies E[In(λ)]=∫Φn(λ−θ)F(dθ).

[F14]

Monotone convergence for the integral: the integral of an increasing limit of nonnegative measurable functions is the limit of their integrals.

[F16]

The addition formulas for sine and cosine and Parity and the Pythagorean identity for sine and cosine: the sine and cosine addition formulas hold, sin⁡(−x)=−sin⁡x, and cos⁡(−x)=cos⁡x.

[F19]

Sequential suprema, infima, limsup, liminf, and pointwise limits of measurable functions are measurable: sequential limits, limsups and convergence sets of measurable real functions are measurable.

[F20]

The Dirac set function at a point and A Dirac set function is a probability measure: each Dirac set function on the Borel sigma-algebra is a probability measure.

[F21]

The multiplicative unit circle is a compact metrizable topological abelian group and Radon measure on an LCH space: T is compact Hausdorff, and a finite Borel measure is Radon when it is finite on compact sets, outer regular on Borel sets, and inner regular on open sets.

[F22]

t↦(cos⁡t,sin⁡t) is a bijection from [0,2π) onto the real unit circle, The zero sets of sine and cosine and the least positive common period 2 pi, and A box in Rn with parameters ai≤bi is Lebesgue measurable of measure ∏i<n(bi−ai), whichever of its faces are included and [F18]: the half-open interval [−π,π) has at most one angular representative of each circle point, and a singleton in R has Lebesgue measure zero under Countable Choice. Thus dλ({z})=0 for each z∈T by the definition in [F11].

[F23]

A nonnegative integral over a null set vanishes: a nonnegative measurable function integrates to zero over a measurable null set.

[F24]
[F25]

Integrable real and complex functions, and their integrals and Monotonicity and nonnegative homogeneity of the nonnegative integral: a bounded complex Borel function is integrable against a finite measure; the nonnegative integral is monotone.

[F27]

A nonnegative measurable function has integral 0 exactly when it vanishes almost everywhere: a nonnegative measurable function with integral zero vanishes almost surely on a probability space.

[A1]

The Axiom of Choice: every family of nonempty sets has a choice function; it supplies the hypothesis used in [F6] and [F12].

[A3]

AC implies DC implies countable choice: the assumed Axiom of Choice supplies Countable Choice for the angular Lebesgue measure convention in [F11] and the singleton calculation in [F22].

Verification

Given: The finite sinusoid construction and the IID innovations and parameters above; AC and DC.

1.1F1F2F3F10F15F16givenalgebra

On Ω={−1,1}2 with weight 1/4 at each outcome, let A(a,b)=v a, B(a,b)=v b, and define the sinusoid model Xt(s)=Acos⁡(tλs)+Bsin⁡(tλs). Direct finite sums and [F15] give E[A]=E[B]=E[AB]=0 and E[A2]=E[B2]=v. Thus E[Xt(s)]=0, and [F16] gives γs(h)=E[Xt+h(s)Xt(s)]=vcos⁡(hλs), independent of t; this model is weakly stationary by [F1]–[F3], [F10].

1.2F4F5F7F9F17givenalgebra

Let St,N:=∑j=0Nρjεt−j. For M>N, independence and centering make all cross terms vanish, so ∥St,M−St,N∥22=σ2∑j=N+1Mρ2j⟶0 by convergence of the real geometric series [F17]. Thus (St,N)N is Cauchy in L2 for every t.

1.3F17F18F28algebra

For a complex z with ∣z∣<1, put CN(z)=∑j=0Nzj. The field and power laws in [F28] give zCN(z)=∑j=1N+1zj, so subtracting the two finite sums yields (1−z)CN(z)=1−zN+1. Since ∣1∣=1, z≠1 and this factor is invertible. Multiplicativity of modulus in [F18] gives ∣zN+1∣=∣z∣N+1 by finite induction, hence ∣CN(z)−11−z∣=∣z∣N+1∣1−z∣⟶0 by [F17] applied to the real number ∣z∣<1. The metric and partial-sum definition in [F28] therefore give ∑j=0∞zj=(1−z)−1, and subtracting its first term gives ∑j=1∞zj=z/(1−z). This proof includes z=0 with z0=1.

2.1A3F11F14F20F21F22F23F24F25F26step 1.1F18algebra

Put a=λs, b=−λs, and Fs=(v/2)(δa+δb). By [F20] this is a finite positive Borel measure. It satisfies the Radon regularity clauses [F21]: for a Borel E⊆T, the open set U=T∖{x∈{a,b}:x∉E} contains E and has Fs(U)=Fs(E); for an open O⊆T, the finite set K=O∩{a,b} is compact and has Fs(K)=Fs(O); finiteness on compact sets follows from Fs(T)=v. For a nonnegative simple q=∑jcj1Ej with pairwise disjoint measurable Ej, its integral is ∫q dFs=∑jcj(v/2)(1a∈Ej+1b∈Ej)=(v/2)(q(a)+q(b)) by [F20] and [F24]. Increasing simple approximation [F24] and monotone convergence [F14] extend this formula to nonnegative measurable q, and decomposition into positive and negative real and imaginary parts extends it to bounded complex Borel q, which is integrable because Fs is finite by [F25]. By [F26] the character λ↦eihλ is Borel, and its modulus is one by [F18], so it is integrable. The evaluation formula now gives ∫TeihλFs(dλ)=v2(eihλs+e−ihλs)=vcos⁡(hλs)=γs(h). Thus Fs is a spectral measure. Its two atoms are distinct because 0<λs<π, and each has mass v/2>0. By [F22]–[F23], any density relative to dλ assigns zero mass to {a}, whereas Fs({a})=v/2; hence Fs has no spectral density.

2.2A1A3F6F7F8F14F17F19F25F27step 1.2given

By [F6] and AC, for each t the Cauchy sequence St,N has an L2 limit class represented by a real random variable Xt(ρ). Cauchy–Schwarz [F7] gives E∣ε0∣≤Eε02=σ2. Monotone convergence [F14] and the real geometric series [F17] therefore give E[∑j=0∞∣ρ∣j∣εt−j∣]=∑j=0∞∣ρ∣jE∣ε0∣≤σ2/(1−∣ρ∣)<∞. Let At,N:=∑j=0N∣ρ∣j∣εt−j∣ and At:=lim⁡NAt,N. For each M>0, M1{At=∞}≤At, so monotonicity [F25] gives MP(At=∞)≤EAt<∞; letting M increase shows the absolute series is finite almost surely. Each At,N and St,N is measurable with respect to Ft:=σ(εs:s≤t), so [F19] makes At, Ct:={At<∞}, and lim sup⁡NSt,N measurable. On Ct the absolute convergence implies St,N has a finite limit. Define Yt to be lim sup⁡NSt,N on Ct and 0 off Ct; it is Ft-measurable and equals the signed series with value 0 on the null divergence set. Its absolute tail satisfies E∣Yt−St,N∣≤σ2∣ρ∣N+1/(1−∣ρ∣)→0. Since St,N→Xt(ρ) in L2, [F7] applied with the constant 1 gives E∣St,N−Xt(ρ)∣→0, and hence E∣Yt−Xt(ρ)∣≤E∣Yt−St,N∣+E∣St,N−Xt(ρ)∣→0. Hence E∣Yt−Xt(ρ)∣=0, and [F27] implies Yt=Xt(ρ) almost surely. Choose the causal version Xt(ρ):=Yt. For N≥1, St,N=εt+ρSt−1,N−1, and ∥ρ(St−1,N−1−Xt−1(ρ))∥2=∣ρ∣∥St−1,N−1−Xt−1(ρ)∥2→0, so uniqueness of L2 limits gives Xt(ρ)=εt+ρXt−1(ρ) in L2. Finite partial sums have mean zero by [F8], and ∣EXt(ρ)∣≤∥Xt(ρ)−St,N∥2→0 by [F7]; hence EXt(ρ)=0.

3.1F4F5F7F9F10F17step 2.2algebra

Finite second moments make every εt integrable by [F7], and its variance is as specified in [F9]. For h≥0, the only nonzero terms in E[St+h,NSt,N] pair the identical innovation indices; by [F4]–[F5], for N≥h this expectation equals σ2∑k=0N−hρh+2k⟶σ2ρh1−ρ2 by [F17]. For the passage to the limit, Cauchy–Schwarz [F7] gives ∣E[Sa,NSb,N]−E[Xa(ρ)Xb(ρ)]∣≤∥Sa,N−Xa(ρ)∥2∥Sb,N∥2+∥Xa(ρ)∥2∥Sb,N−Xb(ρ)∥2→0, because ∥Sb,N∥2≤∥Xb(ρ)∥2+∥Sb,N−Xb(ρ)∥2 is bounded by the L2 convergence. Covariance symmetry for these mean-zero variables follows from commutativity of real products, so the formula for h≥0 gives γρ(h)=σ2ρ∣h∣/(1−ρ2) for every integer h, with ρ0:=1. It is independent of t, so X(ρ) is weakly stationary by [F10].

4.1F12F17F18step 3.1step 1.3A1A2algebra

Since ∣ρ∣<1, the autocovariance is absolutely summable by its formula in step 3.1 and the real geometric series [F17]. Put z−=ρe−iλ and z+=ρeiλ. By [F18], both have modulus ∣ρ∣<1, so step 1.3 sums their series from index 1 as z−/(1−z−) and z+/(1−z+). Applying [F12], these two sums and [F18] yield fρ(λ)=σ22π(1−ρ2)(1+∑h=1∞ρh(e−ihλ+eihλ))=σ22π(1−2ρcos⁡λ+ρ2)=σ22π∣1−ρe−iλ∣2. The denominator is at least (1−∣ρ∣)2>0, so this is a continuous nonnegative density.

5.1F13step 2.1step 4.1algebra∎

Applying [F13] to the two spectral representations gives E[In(s)(λ)]=v2{Φn(λ−λs)+Φn(λ+λs)},E[In(ρ)(λ)]=∫TΦn(λ−θ)fρ(θ) dθ. The first expectation is a sum of two shifted kernels because the spectrum is atomic; the second averages a continuous density. These are exact finite-sample bias formulas and make no distributional or coverage claim.

Sources