Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

✓ 4 results · all verified · 1 also independently AI-judged
Every result on this page is machine-checked by a proof checker and read in full and owner-audited; the judge is an additional, independent cross-model AI review of the proofs. The 3 not AI-judged were verified by owner audit (typically over a confirmed judge false positive), not failures.

Mackeys Imprimitivity Theorem — Examples

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

The examples companion to Mackey's imprimitivity theorem illustrates the classification and its hypotheses. A three-point Z/2-system shows that transitivity (or ergodicity) cannot be dropped from the one-subgroup form of the theorem. The regular translation system on L2(Rn) is the classical position-momentum model: multiplication by indicators is the joint spectral measure of the coordinate operators and the momentum operators generate the translated one-parameter groups. Finite transitive G-sets recover the classical stabilizer-induction classification, with fibre dimension equal to the total dimension divided by the size of the orbit. Finally the real ax+b group and its orientation-preserving subgroup exhibit the little-group reduction explicitly: one infinite-dimensional class for the full group, two for the orientation-preserving subgroup, together with the character families.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

None yet.

5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

CounterexampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

A nontransitive system with two orbits is not classified by one stabilizer

Statement refuted

False claim: every system of imprimitivity for a group G is classified, up to unitary equivalence, by a single closed subgroup H≤G and a strongly continuous unitary representation of H; that is, Mackey's imprimitivity classification needs no transitivity or ergodicity hypothesis.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: the discrete finite group G=Z/2, the three-point set X={a,b,c}, the permutation action with s⋅a=a, s⋅b=c, and the unitary U(s) acting as the identity on Cδa and as the swap δb↔δc on Cδb⊕Cδc.

[F1]

A system of imprimitivity is a pair (U,P) with U a strongly continuous unitary representation and P a PVM satisfying UgP(E)Ug−1=P(gE); it is ergodic when every invariant P(E) is 0 or I, and transitive when its base is equivariantly identified with some homogeneous space G/H (Systems of imprimitivity for a Borel G-space, Transitive systems of imprimitivity and their normalized measure class, Strongly continuous unitary representations, invariant linear subspaces and intertwiners, Projection valued measure).

[F2]

For a finite group, every homogeneous space G/H is the set of left cosets of a subgroup, so ∣Z/2/H∣∈{1,2}; an equivariant isomorphism of G-sets preserves orbit cardinalities and the number of orbits (Left and right cosets gH and Hg of a subgroup, Left group actions, transitive actions, and faithful actions, Equivariant maps and isomorphisms of group actions).

[F3]

The finite set X with the discrete metric is Polish (every Cauchy sequence is eventually constant and the full set is dense), and its power-set σ-algebra is standard Borel (Polish spaces are separable completely metrizable spaces, Standard Borel spaces).

Counterexample

The counterexample is the following finite model. Let G=Z/2={e,s} with the discrete topology act on X={a,b,c} by s⋅a=a, s⋅b=c, s⋅c=b, let H=C3 be the direct sum of the trivial representation on Cδa and the regular representation on Cδb⊕Cδc, and let P be the projection-valued measure with P({a}),P({b}),P({c}) the three coordinate projections. Then (U,P) is a system of imprimitivity on the standard Borel space X; the two orbits are {a} and {b,c}, the projections P({a}) and P({b,c}) are nontrivial and invariant, and the system is not transitive (nor ergodic). No closed subgroup H≤G with a strongly continuous unitary representation σ classifies it: every homogeneous space G/H has one or two points, so it cannot be equivariantly identified with the three-point base, and the theorem correctly decomposes the system as the direct sum of the transitive systems on the two orbits.

Proof technique: counterexample.

Given: the action and the pair (U,P) described above.

1.1F1F3algebra

The operator U(s) is a unitary swap with U(s)2=I, so it defines a unitary representation of the discrete group G; every orbit map from this discrete group is continuous. Covariance: U(s) fixes δa and swaps δb,δc, so U(s)P({a})U(s)−1=P({a})=P(s⋅{a}), U(s)P({b})U(s)−1=P({c})=P(s⋅{b}), and U(s)P({c})U(s)−1=P({b})=P(s⋅{c}); for the identity the identity is trivial, and covariance extends to all subsets since the three singletons generate the power set and both sides are PVM-valued. Hence (U,P) is a system of imprimitivity; it is defined on the standard Borel three-point space of [F3].

2.1step 1.1

Invariant projections and non-ergodicity: P({a}) and P({b,c})=P({b})+P({c}) are nonzero and different from I, and both are invariant under U, since the orbits are {a} and {b,c}; thus the system is not ergodic.

3.1F1F2step 2.1

Nontransitivity: the orbits of the action are the singleton {a} and the two-point set {b,c}, while a homogeneous space of Z/2 has one or two points by [F2]; a transitive system on a homogeneous space is concentrated on a single orbit, so the three-point base with two orbits cannot be equivariantly identified with any G/H. Hence the system is not transitive.

3.2step 2.1F1

Correct decomposition: P({a}) and P({b,c}) are complementary invariant projections, and on their ranges the system restricts to the transitive system on the single orbit {a} (the one-point homogeneous space G/G with the trivial representation) and to the transitive system on {b,c} (the two-point homogeneous space G/{e} with the regular representation), respectively. So (U,P) is the direct sum of the two transitive systems, and the failure above is exactly the failure of a direct sum of transitive systems to be classified by one subgroup.

4.1F2step 3.1

Non-classification by one subgroup: the classification data (H,σ) determine a system whose base is the homogeneous space G/H, of one or two points by [F2], and whose imprimitivity measure is concentrated on the orbits of that base; no such data can reproduce the three-point base with two orbits, since equivariant Borel isomorphisms preserve cardinalities and orbit counts. Therefore the nontransitive system is not classified by a single closed subgroup and a representation of it.

5.1step 3.1step 4.1step 3.2∎

The explicit finite computation therefore exhibits a system of imprimitivity that is neither transitive nor ergodic and is not classified by one stabilizer subgroup; transitivity (or ergodicity) is essential to the one-subgroup form of Mackey's imprimitivity theorem.

ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passOpen item page →

The regular translation system on L2(Rn): position, momentum and trivial stabilizer

Example

Assume AC and let n≥0 be an integer. Let G=Rn act on X=Rn by translation, let U=λG be the left regular representation on L2(Rn), and let P(E) be multiplication by the indicator of a Borel set E⊆Rn. Then (U,P) is a transitive system of imprimitivity on Rn=Rn/{0} with trivial stabilizer, P is the joint spectral measure of the n commuting self-adjoint position operators Mxj of multiplication by the coordinates, and U is the representation induced from the trivial representation of the trivial subgroup; the momentum operators are the self-adjoint Fourier multipliers Pj=F2−1M2πξjF2 on Dj={f∈L2:ξjF2f∈L2}, with Utej=e−itPj. With the repository convention Utej=eitTj, the full self-adjoint and derivative generators are Tj=−Pj and Gj=−iPj on Dj. On Schwartz functions, Pj=−i∂j, Tj=i∂j and Gj=−∂j; the differential notation here is asserted on that test space. The system is the classical model behind the imprimitivity theorem and behind the position-momentum form of the Stone-von Neumann uniqueness theorem.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, the translation action of Rn on itself, and the pair (U,P) with U=λG and P(E)=M1E.

[F1]
[F2]

For the multiplication PVM P(E)=M1E on L2(Rn) one has P(∅)=0, P(Rn)=I, P(E)P(F)=P(E∩F), strong countable additivity, and integration of bounded Borel functions gives multiplication by those functions (Projection valued measure, Bounded borel pvm integral).

[F3]

Translation is a continuous transitive action of Rn on itself whose stabilizer at the origin is {0}, so the base is the homogeneous space Rn/{0}=Rn; the pair (U,P) with the covariance identity is a transitive system of imprimitivity (Left group actions, transitive actions, and faithful actions, Left and right cosets gH and Hg of a subgroup, Systems of imprimitivity for a Borel G-space, Transitive systems of imprimitivity and their normalized measure class).

[F4]

The H={e} clause of the induction theorem identifies Ind⁡{0}Rn1 with the left regular representation and its canonical system with the multiplication system (An induced representation carries a canonical system of imprimitivity on G/H, Unitary induction from a closed subgroup, Strongly continuous unitary representations, invariant linear subspaces and intertwiners).

[F5]

The one-parameter groups t↦Utej are the coordinate translation groups, and their generator is computed directly on the Schwartz space: there the generator satisfies Gjf=−∂jf, so −iGjf=i∂jf, and the multiplier theorem identifies the full Fourier-side domain (Infinitesimal generator of a unitary group, Real L2 multipliers and unitary transport, Plancherel theorem, Fourier transform acts continuously on Schwartz space, Translation, modulation, linear dilation and reflection laws, Schwartz space is dense in L2, Schwartz space and its seminorms).

[F6]

For n≥1, with the metric d∞(x,y)=max⁡j∣xj−yj∣, real completeness gives convergence of Cauchy sequences and the countable dense set Qn makes Rn Polish; its Borel space is standard Borel (The reals are complete, The rationals embed densely in the reals, Q is countably infinite, A product of two at most countable sets is at most countable, Rn as the set of functions n→R, and d1, d2, d∞ are metrics on it, Polish spaces are separable completely metrizable spaces, Standard Borel spaces). For n=0, use the zero metric on the singleton R0 instead.

[F7]

AC is the standing hypothesis (The Axiom of Choice).

Verification

technique · direct

Given: AC, G=Rn, X=Rn, the translation action, U=λG on L2(Rn), and P(E)=M1E.

1.1F1F2F3algebra

For n=0, the base and group are singletons, L2(R0)=C with unit mass, U=I and P is the one-point PVM; induction from the trivial group gives this system, and there are no coordinate operators. Thus all claims hold in that case. Assume n≥1 for the remaining steps. Then U is a strongly continuous unitary representation and P is a projection-valued measure by [F1] and [F2]. Covariance is a direct computation from (Utf)(x)=f(x−t): UtP(E)Ut−1=M1E(⋅−t)=P(t+E). The action is transitive and the stabilizer of the origin is {0} by [F3], so the base is Rn/{0}=Rn with the trivial subgroup.

1.2F2F5algebra

For each j, Mxj has domain {f∈L2:xjf∈L2} and is an unbounded self-adjoint real multiplication operator by the multiplier result of [F5]. Its spectral projections are M1{x:xj∈A} for Borel A⊆R. They commute, and the joint multiplication PVM is P; the unbounded coordinate integral ∫xj dP equals Mxj on its stated domain, while bounded Borel functions of the coordinates act by the bounded integrals of [F2].

1.3F4

U is induced from the trivial representation of the trivial subgroup: by the H={e} clause of [F4], Ind⁡{0}Rn1 is the left regular representation on L2(Rn), and the canonical system of that induction is the multiplication system P.

1.4F5algebra

For Schwartz f, the difference quotient (Utejf−f)/t tends in L2 to −∂jf, by the fundamental theorem of calculus and a Schwartz majorant. To identify the full domain, apply the unitary Fourier transform of [F5]: coordinate translation becomes multiplication by e−2πitξj in the usual Fourier normalization. The derivative limit exists precisely when ξjf^∈L2: sufficiency follows from ∣(e−2πitξj−1)/t∣≤2π∣ξj∣ and dominated convergence, and necessity from an almost-everywhere convergent subsequence of any L2 limit of the quotients, whose pointwise limit is −2πiξjf^. Define Pj=F2−1M2πξjF2 on Dj={f:ξjF2f∈L2}. The multiplier theorem makes it self-adjoint and its transported exponential is Utej=e−itPj. Thus Gj=−iPj and Tj=−iGj=−Pj on the full domain Dj. On Schwartz functions the Fourier differentiation identity gives Pj=−i∂j, recovering Gj=−∂j and Tj=i∂j there. No pointwise derivative of a general L2 class is used.

2.1F6step 1.1

Standard Borel and Polish: by [F6] the metric d∞ makes Rn complete with countable dense subset Qn, so Rn is Polish and its Borel space is standard Borel, while the singleton case n=0 uses the zero metric as in step 1.1; the base with its standard Borel structure is the one used by the system.

3.1step 1.1step 1.2step 1.3step 1.4step 2.1F7∎

Steps 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 1.4 and 2.1 verify all the displayed claims: transitivity with trivial stabilizer, the PVM as joint spectral measure of position, the induced-representation identification, the momentum generators, and the standard-Borel base.

ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passOpen item page →

Finite transitive G-sets recover the stabilizer-induction classification

Example

Assume AC. Let G be a finite group with the discrete topology acting transitively on a finite set X, fix x0∈X, put H=Stab⁡G(x0) and identify X with G/H. Let H=ℓ2(X) carry the permutation representation U, and let P be the projection-valued measure on X assigning to E⊆X the orthogonal projection onto the coordinate subspace ℓ2(E). Then (U,P) is a transitive system of imprimitivity on the finite standard Borel space X, and it is unitarily equivalent to the canonical system of the trivial representation 1H of H; the induced representation Ind⁡HG1H is the permutation representation on G/H, so the finite case of Mackey's theorem reduces to the classical stabilizer/induction classification. More generally a finite-dimensional unitary representation of G carrying a transitive system on X is induced from a unitary representation of H on a fibre of dimension dim⁡(H)/∣X∣, by the general theorem.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, the finite group G, the transitive finite G-set X, the stabilizer H of x0, and the permutation representation U on ℓ2(X) with the coordinate projections P.

[F1]

The finite set X with the discrete metric is Polish (every Cauchy sequence is eventually constant, the full set is dense) and its power-set σ-algebra is standard Borel; unitary representations of the discrete group G are strongly continuous (Polish spaces are separable completely metrizable spaces, Standard Borel spaces, Hilbert space).

[F2]

The coordinate projections ℓ2(E) are orthogonal projections satisfying P(E)P(F)=P(E∩F), P(∅)=0, P(X)=I and finite additivity, so P is a projection-valued measure; the permutation representation is unitary with UP(E)U−1=P(gE) (The orthogonal projection PWv is the W-component in V=W⊕W⊥, Hilbert projections are linear, self-adjoint and contractive, Projection valued measure, Left group actions, transitive actions, and faithful actions).

[F3]

Transitivity identifies X with the left coset space G/H, where H=Stab⁡G(x0), and Ind⁡HG1H is the permutation representation of G on G/H (Left and right cosets gH and Hg of a subgroup, Left group actions, transitive actions, and faithful actions, Inducing the trivial representation gives the permutation representation on G/H, The induced R-linear G-module Ind⁡HGW as H-covariant functions on G).

[F4]

Mackey's imprimitivity theorem and its uniqueness clause apply to the transitive system on G/H: it is unitarily equivalent to the canonical induced system of a strongly continuous unitary representation of H, and the inducing representation is unique up to unitary equivalence (Mackey's imprimitivity theorem, Uniqueness in the imprimitivity theorem, Systems of imprimitivity for a Borel G-space, Transitive systems of imprimitivity and their normalized measure class).

[F5]

AC is the standing hypothesis (The Axiom of Choice).

Verification

technique · direct

Given: AC, the data above.

1.1F1F2F3

(U,P) is a system of imprimitivity: by [F1] U is a strongly continuous unitary representation on the finite-dimensional space ℓ2(X), and by [F2] P is a projection-valued measure with UP(E)U−1=P(gE) for all g and all E⊆X. The action is transitive, so the system is transitive on the finite homogeneous space G/H by [F3], which is a standard Borel space by [F1].

2.1F2F3step 1.1construct

The equivalence preserves both parts of the system. For v∈ℓ2(X) set Fv(g)=v(gx0). Then Fv(gh)=Fv(g) for h∈H, and ∑gH∣Fv(g)∣2=∑x∈X∣v(x)∣2, so this is a unitary onto the covariant model of Ind⁡HG1H with counting quotient measure. It sends (Uav)(x)=v(a−1x) to Fv(a−1g) and sends P(E) to multiplication by 1E(gx0). Thus the permutation system is the canonical induced system of 1H, not merely an equivalent group representation.

3.1F2F4step 2.1algebra

Fibre dimension: for a finite-dimensional unitary representation carrying a transitive system, the fibres P({x})H are mutually orthogonal (the singletons are disjoint) and sum to H; transitivity of U transports P({x}) to P({gx}), so all fibres have the same dimension d; hence ∣X∣d=dim⁡H and d=dim⁡(H)/∣X∣. The general theorem identifies the representation with the induction of a unitary representation of H on one fibre, of that dimension; the induced space has the original total dimension.

4.1step 1.1step 2.1step 3.1F5∎

Steps 1.1, 2.1 and 3.1 verify the claims: the permutation system is a transitive system of imprimitivity on the finite standard Borel space, it is equivalent to the canonical system of the trivial representation of the stabilizer, the finite computation of the induction is the permutation representation, and the fibre dimension of a general finite-dimensional transitive system is dim⁡(H)/∣X∣.

ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passOpen item page →

Little groups for the real ax+b group and its orientation-preserving subgroup

Example

Assume AC. Let G=Aff⁡(R)=R⋊R×, N its translation subgroup, and K its dilation subgroup. Identify N^≅R by χλ(x)=eiλx. The dual action is λ↦λ/k, so the full group K has two orbits, {0} and R∖{0}, with stabilizers K and {1} respectively. Its little groups are G and N. The irreducible representations are the one-dimensional characters ∣a∣itsign⁡(a)δ for t∈R, δ∈{0,1}, and one infinite-dimensional class π=Ind⁡NGχ1≅Ind⁡NGχ−1. For the orientation-preserving group G0=R⋊R>0 the nonzero dual orbits are separately (0,∞) and (−∞,0); they give two inequivalent infinite-dimensional representations π1,π−1, alongside the characters ait. Thus G^=(R×{0,1})⊔{π} and G0^=R⊔{π1,π−1}.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, the groups G=R⋊R× and G0=R⋊R>0 with translation normal subgroup N≅R and dilation quotient, and the identification N^≅R by χλ(x)=eiλx.

[F1]

The Euclidean dual is R^≅R with χλ(x)=eiλx, and every continuous character of R is of this form; the dual is locally compact abelian (Continuous characters of the real line are exponentials, The dual of a locally compact abelian group is locally compact abelian, The Pontryagin dual with the compact-open topology).

[F2]

The semidirect product has the normal translation subgroup N and quotient R× (respectively R>0), acting on N by αk(x)=kx; the dual action is k⋅χ=χ∘αk−1 ( The external semidirect product N⋊αH, Strongly continuous unitary representations, invariant linear subspaces and intertwiners).

[F3]

The little-group corollary applies whenever the dual orbits are regular: for an abelian closed normal N with G second countable locally compact, every irreducible strongly continuous unitary representation of G is induced from χ⊗θ on Hχ=N⋊Kχ (Mackey little-group reduction for an abelian normal subgroup).

[F4]

An induced representation carries the canonical multiplication PVM. Spectral PVM uniqueness, density of the Fourier transforms in C0(N^), and the diagonal commutant theorem identify any bounded commutant operator of a one-dimensional inducing fibre with a scalar multiplication operator. Invariant scalar functions on a transitive quasi-invariant homogeneous space are constant a.e., by applying ergodicity to rational superlevel sets of their real and imaginary parts (Spectral measure of a unitary representation of an abelian group, covariance, and ergodicity, LCA Fourier transforms form a dense algebra in C0 of the dual, Decomposable operators are the commutant of diagonal multiplication, A transitive Borel G-space with a quasi-invariant measure class is ergodic, An induced representation carries a canonical system of imprimitivity on G/H, Bounded borel pvm integral, Locally finite Borel measures on second-countable LCH spaces are regular).

[F5]

Every bounded self-intertwiner of an irreducible unitary representation is scalar. For an abelian group all representation operators commute with the representation, so irreducibility forces a one-dimensional representation. Characters of R are the exponentials of [F1]; logarithm identifies R>0 with the additive line, and the two-element sign group has characters 1 and sign⁡ (Schur lemma for complex unitary representations, Continuous characters of the real line are exponentials).

[F6]

AC is the standing hypothesis (The Axiom of Choice).

Verification

technique · direct

Given: AC, the two groups and the identifications above.

1.1F1F2F3algebra

The dual action is (k⋅χλ)(b)=eiλb/k, so the parameter is λ/k. For K=R× the orbits are {0} and R×, with stabilizers K and {1}; for K=R>0 they are {0}, (0,∞), and (−∞,0), again with trivial nonzero stabilizers. Each partition is finite and Borel, hence regular, so [F3] makes the corresponding little-group inductions exhaustive.

2.1F1F3F5step 1.1

At the zero character the inducing subgroup is G and N acts trivially. The irreducible quotient representations are one-dimensional by [F5]. Logarithm and the sign decomposition R×≅R>0×{±1} give ∣a∣itsign⁡(a)δ for the full group and ait for the positive group. Distinct parameters give distinct characters: vary log⁡a and then the sign.

2.2F2F4step 1.1algebra

For λ≠0 use quotient coordinates k∈K with section s(k)=(0,k) and Haar measure dk/∣k∣ (restricted to k>0 for the positive group). The induced action on L2(K,dk/∣k∣) is (πλ(b,a)f)(k)=eiλb/kf(k/a). Indeed s(k)−1(b,a)s(k/a)=(b/k,1), and the quotient measure is invariant under k↦ak, so its density factor is one. Finite scalar Borel measures on the real line are regular by [F4]. The spectral PVM of N is multiplication by 1E(λ/k): it is a regular PVM under the homeomorphism k↦λ/k onto the nonzero orbit, and its character integral is the displayed translation action, so [F4]'s spectral uniqueness identifies it.

3.1F4step 2.2

Let A commute with πλ. It commutes with all integrated N-operators, hence with their C0 algebra by Fourier-transform density, and then with the spectral PVM. For the last inference, each unitary in the commutant conjugates P to a regular PVM with the same integrated N-representation, hence preserves P by spectral uniqueness. For a general commutant operator, its self-adjoint real and imaginary parts commute with N, and eitS for either part S is a commuting unitary, by the norm-convergent power series. Differentiating that series at t=0 shows that S commutes with P, and hence so does A. Thus A commutes with all diagonal multiplications on K and is Mu for some bounded scalar u, by the diagonal commutant theorem. Commutation with πλ(0,a) makes u(k/a)=u(k) a.e. for every a∈K. Transitive ergodicity, applied to rational superlevel sets of the real and imaginary parts, makes u constant a.e. Thus the commutant is scalar; an invariant closed subspace would have a commuting orthogonal projection, so πλ is irreducible. Disjoint intervals in log⁡∣k∣ give infinitely many nonzero orthogonal indicator sections, proving infinite dimension.

4.1F4step 2.1step 2.2step 3.1algebra

For r∈K put (Rrf)(k)=f(rk). Haar invariance makes Rr unitary, and the explicit formula gives Rrπλ(b,a)Rr−1=πλ/r(b,a). Thus parameters in one orbit give equivalent representations. For the full group r=−1 equates λ=1 and λ=−1; for the positive group no r changes sign, and the two classes are inequivalent because their spectral PVMs have disjoint supports, by [F4]'s uniqueness. They are also inequivalent to the quotient characters, whose N-spectrum is {0}.

5.1step 1.1step 2.1step 3.1step 4.1F6∎

Exhaustiveness from step 1.1, the character classification of step 2.1, irreducibility and infinite dimension from step 3.1, and the equivalences of step 4.1 give G^=(R×{0,1})⊔{π} and G0^=R⊔{π1,π−1}.

Sources