Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Affine Perverse Vanishing And Universal Hyperplanes

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

Objective. This page develops the perverse-sheaf geometry of affine varieties and of universal hyperplane families. It first proves that a closed affine complex algebraic subset with a finite smooth algebraic Whitney stratification admits a generic squared-distance exhaustion whose restriction to every stratum has only finitely many nondegenerate critical points and whose differential kills no limiting tangent plane; the construction uses conormal boundaries, Morse-Sard nullity, the complexified critical incidence and the Zariski density of the real diagonal, and it never asserts distinct critical values. The second result converts that exhaustion into stratified Morse data for constructible coefficients over any field: the local relative cochain complex of a critical band is the normal relative complex shifted by the real tangent Morse index, the normal complex is the restriction cone from the stalk to the collared complex link, relative complexes across a critical value are a finite direct sum, and regular bands preserve cohomology; both the boundary normal form and the complex-link coefficient transport are constructed in full. From there the page proves Artin vanishing on affine varieties: the cohomology of an algebraically constructible sheaf of finite-dimensional vector spaces vanishes above the dimension of the closure of its support, objects of the perverse upper aisle have no positive-degree cohomology on an affine variety, and dually objects of the lower aisle have no negative-degree compactly supported cohomology. The affine-open characterization of the upper perverse aisle is derived with an explicit top-degree detector for nonzero local systems, and it identifies affine morphisms as one-sided perverse-exact: Ru∗ preserves the upper aisle and Ru! the lower aisle. The final pair of results switches to projective geometry: general projective hyperplane sections of a smooth projective variety lower the defect of semismallness by one (and preserve smallness), while the universal hyperplane family satisfies the relative weak Lefschetz theorem and its maximal perverse subobject and quotient from the base are the pullbacks of the first perverse cohomology objects of Rf∗K. The two final results are the geometric heart of the projective perverse decomposition route built on the later pages; all identifications in them are constructions with their restriction maps, not statements about ranks of cohomology groups.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

Affine algebraic Whitney strata admit distance exhaustions with finitely many stratified Morse points

Statement

Assume AC. Let Z⊂CN be closed algebraic and let S be a finite Whitney stratification by smooth locally closed complex algebraic strata. In every prescribed nonempty real open subset of the parameter space CN, there exists a such that ϕa(z)=∥z−a∥2 is a proper strongly plurisubharmonic exhaustion of Z, its restriction to each stratum has only nondegenerate critical points, there are finitely many such points in total, and at every critical point p∈S its ambient differential is nonzero on every limiting tangent space of another stratum approaching p. Multiple critical points may have equal critical values; the Statement makes no unsupported distinct-value assertion. The same conclusion applies on any closed affine complex algebraic embedding of Z.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: the closed affine algebraic set Z⊆CN, its finite algebraic Whitney stratification, and the Axiom of Choice.

[F1]

The Axiom of Choice implies countable choice (AC implies DC implies countable choice, The Axiom of Choice), and under countable choice the published Morse-Sard theorem makes the critical value set of a smooth map of smooth manifolds null (Morse-Sard for smooth manifolds).

[F2]

The published generic-fibre corollary gives, on each irreducible component, source dimension equal to image-closure dimension plus the generic fibre dimension (Image dimension and the generic fibre formula), and a zero-dimensional classical variety is finite (Zero-dimensional varieties are finite sets).

[F3]

Algebraic conormal Jacobian charts and the terminating smooth-locus decomposition use the Jacobian criterion over the perfect field C (Jacobian rank detects regularity at closed points), the openness and density of the regular locus (Dense regular loci on every component) and the holomorphic implicit function theorem (The holomorphic implicit function theorem), which give actual complex manifold charts on the dense regular loci.

[F4]

The stratification is a finite Whitney stratification by smooth locally closed complex algebraic strata with the local analytic charts, conormal and limiting-tangent vocabulary of Finite complex algebraic Whitney stratification and control data; every stratum is a smooth complex manifold of some dimension s, and Whitney condition (B) controls limiting tangent planes.

Proof

Given: the closed affine Z, the finite algebraic Whitney stratification S and AC.

1.1givenF3F4construct

For a smooth stratum S of complex dimension s, its algebraic conormal bundle CS⊂T∗CN has complex dimension N: on a Jacobian chart the independent differentials of local equations span the conormal fibres, of rank N−s, giving a locally trivial algebraic bundle. On each irreducible component the closure of CS has dimension N and its boundary has dimension at most N−1, since a proper closed subset of an irreducible variety of dimension N has dimension at most N−1. Let D be the finite union of these conormal boundaries. If a covector λ kills a limiting tangent plane Q=lim⁡TpmS at a point outside S, then λ lies in that boundary: the orthogonal projections of λ onto the annihilators of TpmS are conormal covectors at the points pm and converge to the projection of λ onto Q⊥, which is λ because λ kills Q. Thus every bad limiting-tangent covector lies in the complex algebraic set D of complex dimension at most N−1.

1.2F1F4construct

Consider the real critical incidence IS={(a,z):z∈S, d(ϕa∣S)z=0}. Differentiation in a surjects onto Tz∗S, since every real covector on TzS extends to one on the ambient Euclidean space; concretely IS is the real normal bundle via (z,v)↦(a=z+v,z) with v⊥TzS, and the smooth Gram-matrix charts of that normal bundle exhibit it as a smooth real manifold of dimension 2s+(2N−2s)=2N. In local stratum coordinates its tangent equation is Hzv+Bzδa=0, where Hz is the Hessian of ϕa∣S and Bz is the surjective parameter derivative. The differential of (a,z)↦a from IS to CN has kernel {(0,v):Hzv=0}; since source and target have equal real dimension, it is surjective exactly where Hz is invertible. Hence [F1] makes the parameters with a degenerate stratum critical point null, and a finite union over the strata preserves nullity.

2.1F1F3step 1.1construct

Identify real ambient covectors with complex covectors by λ↦Re⁡λ. The map (a,z)↦(z,dϕa(z)) from CN×CN to the real cotangent bundle is a real smooth diffeomorphism, because dϕa(z) is twice the real covector corresponding to z−a‾. Therefore the inverse image of each smooth algebraic stratum of D has real dimension at most 2N−2, and its projection to the a-coordinate is a smooth map whose source dimension is smaller than its target dimension 2N, so every point is critical and [F1] makes the image null; a finite algebraic stratification of D is obtained by successively taking each component's smooth locus and its lower-dimensional singular complement, which terminates because the dimension strictly decreases, and the finite union of the null images is null. Outside this null set, dϕa kills no forbidden limiting tangent space.

3.1F2step 2.1step 1.2construct

Finiteness of the critical set uses algebraic geometry rather than a finiteness claim for real analytic sets. Complexify the squared distance to Fu,v(z,w)=∑k=1N(zk−uk)(wk−vk) on S×S‾, where S‾ is obtained by conjugating the equations of S. Its complex critical incidence over the parameter space CN×CN is the algebraic incidence cut out by the two conormal conditions w−v⊥TzS and z−u⊥TwS‾; it is isomorphic to the algebraic conormal bundle of S×S‾, of complex dimension 2N, equal to the parameter dimension, because the two gradient coefficients w−v and z−u are exactly the conormal vectors that uniquely determine (u,v) for given (z,w). If an irreducible component projects dominantly, [F2] gives a nonempty open of parameters over which its fibres are zero-dimensional and hence finite by [F2]; if not, one avoids its proper closed image closure. The set of parameters a with (a,aˉ) in this nonempty complex Zariski open is Euclidean open and dense. Indeed, a nonzero polynomial vanishing on its proper algebraic complement restricts to a nonzero polynomial in the real coordinates (x,y) under the invertible substitution (a,aˉ)=(x+iy,x−iy); such a polynomial cannot vanish on any nonempty real open box. Thus the inverse image of the complement has empty interior. This inverse image involves complex conjugation, so no complex Zariski openness of the good real-parameter set is asserted. Therefore the prescribed nonempty real open subset meets it in a nonempty real open set, which cannot be contained in the null exceptional sets of steps 1.2 and 2.1; choose such a real parameter a. Its real stratum critical points lie in the finite complex fibre over (a,aˉ) just constructed: at (z,zˉ) the real diagonal tangent vectors (t,tˉ) span TzS×TzˉS‾ over C, and the complex differential of F on them is the real differential of ϕa, so vanishing on the real form implies vanishing on the whole complex tangent.

4.1step 1.1step 1.2step 2.1step 3.1∎

Choose such an a. The Euclidean square distance is bounded below and proper on the closed subset Z, and its ambient Levi form is the positive definite Euclidean Hermitian form, so its restriction to every positive-dimensional complex stratum is strongly plurisubharmonic and the sublevel sets exhaust Z; on the singular variety the strong plurisubharmonicity statement is the stated inline verification for the concrete function ∥z−a∥2, whose ambient complex Hessian is the identity. Steps 1.2, 2.1 and 3.1 give exactly the nondegeneracy, limiting-tangent and finiteness conclusions: on a zero-dimensional stratum the Hessian condition is vacuous because its tangent space is zero, and the ambient differential condition there is the step 2.1 exclusion, while the stratum contributes only its finitely many points, and the empty variety has no critical points. The argument works verbatim on any closed affine complex algebraic embedding of Z, since only the Euclidean structure of the ambient affine space is used. No stratified product theorem or complex-link identification is used to establish this exhaustion.

LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedOpen item page →

Smooth and noncharacteristic complex pullbacks are perverse-exact

Statement

Assume the inherited Axiom of Choice. Let P be a bounded algebraically constructible complex on a complex variety Y. If a:X→Y is smooth of pure relative complex dimension d, then a∗[d] is perverse-exact and a!=a∗[2d] in complex orientation. Fix a finite complex algebraic Whitney stratification S of Y. If i:Z↪Y is the restriction of a smooth complex closed embedding of codimension c transverse to every stratum of S, then i∗[−c] is perverse-exact on the subcategory of bounded complexes whose cohomology sheaves are locally constant of finite rank on every stratum of S, and i!P≅i∗P[−2c] for every P in this subcategory. No assertion is made for arbitrary closed embeddings.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: the morphism a, the closed embedding i transverse to the fixed stratification S, the complex P constructible for S when applying i, and the inherited choice assumption.

[F1]

Controlled stratified submersions have local trivializations preserving their base coordinates (Controlled stratified submersions have continuous local trivializations, Finite complex algebraic Whitney stratification and control data). Transversality makes the local defining map of Z a submersion on every stratum near the point under consideration. Its local trivialization gives a stratum-preserving product W×D2c, where W is a neighborhood in Z, D2c is an open normal disk and W is the zero slice. The derived coefficient comparison in this product is established in step 1.3; a homeomorphism of unstratified sets alone would not supply it.

[F2]

The perverse upper support condition is dim⁡supp⁡Hq(P)≤−q, and duality exchanges the upper and lower perverse aisles (Ordinary middle perverse t structure, recollement and intersection complexes, Canonical t structure on a derived category, Algebraically constructible complexes of analytic field sheaves). Six-functor duality gives Da∗=a!D and Di∗=i!D, support localization computes i!, and smooth complex orientation gives a!=a∗[2d] (Actual analytic constructible sheaves admit coherent six operations). The Axiom of Choice is assumed as in The Axiom of Choice.

[F3]

Finite conical local models provide compatible finite deleted-boundary triangulations of the local slice (Complex algebraic constructible complexes have finite conical cochain models). On finite deleted-boundary models, the actual analytic derived-incidence theorem proves the natural comparison Rpr⁡∗pr⁡∗B≅B⊗kC∗(F;k) for a product projection with fiber F, carrying the adjunction unit to B⊗(k→C∗(F;k)) (Finite simplicial constructible sheaves have an actual derived incidence model, Statement and proof steps 2.3, 4.1 and 5.1). Thus pullback is fully faithful when F is a nonempty contractible disk. This is a proved product comparison on the supplied models; contractibility alone does not assert base change for an arbitrary nonproper map.

Proof

Given: the hypotheses of the Statement.

1.1F2givenalgebra

If P is in the upper perverse aisle, a support of Hq+d(P) has dimension at most −(q+d). Its inverse image under a smooth relative-d map has dimension at most −(q+d)+d=−q. Since ordinary pullback is exact for field-module sheaves, this is exactly the support condition for a∗P[d], so a∗[d] preserves the upper aisle. Its relative disk bundle is complex oriented, so the smooth exceptional pullback formula in [F2] gives a!=a∗[2d]. Then D(a∗P[d])=a!DP[−d]=a∗DP[d], so the upper-aisle calculation for DP also proves preservation of the lower aisle.

1.2F2givenalgebra

Suppose P is in the upper perverse aisle and constructible for S. The nonzero stalk loci of its cohomology sheaves are unions of strata, each of dimension bounded by the corresponding support dimension. For a transverse embedding i, a stratum S of dimension s meets Z either trivially or in dimension s−c, so the support of Hq−c(P) meets Z in dimension at most −(q−c)−c=−q; this is the upper perverse condition for i∗P[−c]. The exact shift uses transversality on every stratum supporting that cohomology sheaf.

1.3F1F2F3construct

In a local controlled product W×D2c from [F1], shrink W to a finite conical local model of its induced stratification and triangulate it compatibly by [F3]; the disk also has a finite deleted-boundary model. The pullback of P to this product has bounded finite-rank locally constant cohomology on each simplex times the disk. Such a piece is contractible, so its cohomology sheaves are constant by local-system transport along paths and contracting homotopies. Apply [F3] with base a point and this contractible product as fiber: pullback from the point is fully faithful, and its essential image is closed under finite extensions because connecting morphisms lift. Ordinary truncation triangles therefore show that the complex on each piece is pulled back from a finite coefficient complex. Filter W by closed skeleta. Pullback along pr⁡:W×D2c→W commutes with open extension by zero and closed pushforward: their natural comparisons are isomorphisms on stalks, including zero stalks off the relevant product subsets. On each skeleton [F3] makes this pullback fully faithful; lifting the connecting morphisms in the open/closed triangles and taking their cones proves inductively that P∣W×D2c≅pr⁡∗B, with B its zero-slice restriction. Support localization [F2], computed in the finite product models [F3], now identifies its exceptional zero-slice restriction with B⊗kC∗(D2c,D2c∖{0};k). The relative normal complex has its sole cohomology k in degree 2c, with the complex-oriented generator, giving i!P≅i∗P[−2c]. For c=0 this is the identity calculation. These are the natural support comparisons with the oriented normal class; transitions preserve the orientation of the complex normal bundle, so they agree on overlaps and glue.

2.1F2F3step 1.1step 1.2step 1.3∎

Verdier duality preserves constructibility for S, by the stratumwise finite conical coefficient models in [F3] and duality in [F2]. Dualizing gives D(i∗P[−c])=i!DP[c]=i∗DP[−c]; apply step 1.2 to DP and use [F2] to obtain lower perverse exactness on that subcategory. Together with steps 1.1 and 1.3 this proves both exactness assertions and both oriented exceptional-pullback formulas, including the cases of relative dimension or codimension zero.

Remarks

The controlled local product, the analytic product-projection comparison on finite models and the support/duality calculus are separate inputs [F1]–[F3]. No affine vanishing, decomposition theorem or Hodge theory is an input, so this item lies strictly before the projective perverse theorem.

LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

Artin vanishing on complex affine varieties

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice as inherited from the constructible derived-category construction. If Z is a complex affine algebraic variety of complex dimension d and F is an algebraically constructible sheaf of finite-dimensional k-vector spaces, then Hq(Z,F)=0 for q>d. More precisely the bound is the dimension of the closure of its support. If P∈pDc≤0(Z;k), then Hq(Z,P)=0 for q>0. If P∈pDc≥0(Z;k), then Hcq(Z,P)=0 for q<0. The empty variety and zero coefficients give zero groups.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: the affine complex algebraic variety Z, its algebraic Whitney strata, the constructible complex P or sheaf F over the field k, and the choice assumption of the Statement.

[F1]

The affine finite-critical strongly plurisubharmonic distance exhaustion is supplied by Affine algebraic Whitney strata admit distance exhaustions with finitely many stratified Morse points, and the local stratified Morse supplier Complex stratified Morse data, constructible transport and complex links gives the following exact input: a generic proper strongly plurisubharmonic stratified Morse exhaustion on an affine algebraic variety has finitely many critical points, and across a critical point on a stratum of complex dimension s and real tangent Morse index λ its relative constructible cohomology is the normal Morse cohomology shifted by λ; the normal pair has the constructible-cohomology triangle between the stalk on the cone and a collared complex link of dimension at most d−s−1, including an empty link; unrefined transverse link strata have the same codimensions relative to the allowed upper dimension d−s−1 as their original strata relative to d, and further compatible refinements only weaken the stalk upper bound; this upper-dimension convention covers nonpure varieties and the vocabulary is that of Finite complex algebraic Whitney stratification and control data. For a local link cut out by a ball, the supplier identifies its closed and open versions by a stratum-preserving collar, chooses a nearby generic distance center preserving that collar, and uses −log⁡(R2−ϕa) on the open ball as a proper strongly plurisubharmonic exhaustion with the same finite critical points and Hessian indices; a local ball-cut link is not assumed to be a closed affine variety, and regular intervals preserve constructible cohomology, including the interval above the last critical value. This includes the sheaf-valued product and link identifications, not just a statement about ordinary real CW dimension.

[F2]

The support definition of the perverse upper aisle is dim⁡supp⁡Hb(P)≤−b, and the perverse aisles are the two halves of the ordinary middle perverse t-structure (Ordinary middle perverse t structure, recollement and intersection complexes, Canonical t structure on a derived category). Verdier duality exchanges the two perverse aisles, and finite constructible duality identifies Hcq(Z,P) with the dual of H−q(Z,DP) (Actual analytic constructible sheaves admit coherent six operations, Algebraically constructible complexes of analytic field sheaves); the Axiom of Choice is assumed as in The Axiom of Choice.

Proof

Given: the data of the Statement and the exact stratified Morse input [F1]. We prove the stalk-codimension version of the Morse bound first, by induction on the allowed complex codimension of a stratum; in this local induction d may be any upper bound on the actual complex dimension, which permits nonpure links without claiming that they attain that upper bound.

1.1givenalgebra

At a critical point on a complex manifold of dimension s, a strongly plurisubharmonic function has tangent Morse index at most s. Indeed, if its real negative subspace had dimension larger than s, it would meet its image under multiplication by −1 nontrivially, so it would contain a real two-plane spanned by v,−1v; the sum of the Hessian on these two vectors is a positive multiple of the Levi form on v, positive for a strongly plurisubharmonic function, whereas both Hessian values would instead be negative, a contradiction.

2.1F1step 1.1inductionbaseih

Suppose a constructible complex A has stalks satisfying Hq(A)x=0 for q>d−s on each stratum of complex dimension s, and put c=d−s. For c=0 the normal Morse pair is the point pair and its cohomology has the asserted upper bound zero. Assume the upper normal-Morse bound for all smaller codimensions. The complex link at a codimension-c stratum has dimension at most c−1, and we use c−1 as an allowed upper dimension even when the variety is nonpure; an empty link has zero cohomology. A critical point of its collar-compatible logarithmic strongly plurisubharmonic exhaustion lies on a link stratum of dimension c−1−c′, where c′ is its codimension relative to that allowed upper dimension and satisfies 0≤c′≤c−1<c. Before refinement its stalk bound is the original codimension bound, and refinement lowers the stratum dimension and therefore weakens the required upper bound, so the same stalk hypothesis holds. By the induction hypothesis its normal Morse cohomology vanishes above c′, and by step 1.1 its tangential index is at most c−1−c′; thus its relative link cohomology vanishes above c−1. Starting with the empty sublevel and applying the long exact pair sequences at each critical value proves that the link cohomology vanishes above c−1, and the collared-link and regular-interval clauses of [F1] identify this calculation with the full complex link.

3.1F1step 1.1step 2.1induction

The normal Morse triangle has stalk cohomology in one term and link cohomology in the other; in degrees q>c the stalk term vanishes by the hypothesis on A, and the link term in degree q−1 vanishes by step 2.1, so its long exact sequence makes normal Morse cohomology vanish above c. This completes the codimension induction. For Z itself, at a critical point on an s-dimensional stratum the normal degree is at most d−s and the tangential index is at most s, so [F1] makes each relative group vanish above d; the finitely many critical-value exact sequences, followed by the regular interval above the last value, give Hq(Z,A)=0 for q>d.

4.1F1step 3.1algebra

A degree-zero sheaf F satisfies the stalk hypothesis of step 2.1 because every codimension d−s is nonnegative and Hq(F)=0 for q≠0, which proves its dimension-d bound. Replace Z by the closed algebraic support closure of F, of dimension e: extension by zero along that closed embedding recovers F and its global cohomology, so the same argument gives the sharpened bound q>e.

5.1F2step 4.1algebradischarge-induction∎

For P∈pDc≤0(Z;k) use its finite hypercohomology spectral sequence E2a,b=Ha(Z,Hb(P)). By [F2] the support dimension of Hb(P) is at most −b, so step 4.1 makes E2a,b=0 whenever a+b>0, and the bounded spectral sequence therefore gives Hq(Z,P)=0 for q>0. For P∈pDc≥0, apply this result to DP∈pDc≤0 and the duality in [F2] to obtain Hcq(Z,P)=0 for q<0. Empty spaces and zero sheaves are covered by the zero spectral sequence.

Remarks

This is the affine-cohomology deduction relative to the exact local Morse product and link supplier [F1]; the local construction, including its boundary and complex-link coefficient components, is embedded in that supplier's proof. Goresky prints the codimension induction as Theorem 17.7 and the affine vanishing as Theorem 17.9; the nonpure upper-dimension, nearby-center and collared logarithmic exhaustion clauses are explicit local inputs rather than a treatment of a ball-cut link as affine. The relative affine-morphism one-sided perverse exactness is a separate later deduction, not silently included here.

LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

Affine morphisms have one-sided perverse exactness

Statement

Assume the inherited Axiom of Choice. For an affine morphism u:X→Y of complex algebraic varieties and finite-dimensional field coefficients, Ru∗ sends pDc≤0(X) into pDc≤0(Y) and Ru! sends pDc≥0(X) into pDc≥0(Y). More precisely a bounded constructible K belongs to pDc≤0(Y) if and only if Hq(V,K)=0 for every affine Zariski open V⊂Y and every q>0.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: the affine morphism u:X→Y, the bounded constructible complex or its coefficients, and the inherited choice assumption.

[F1]

Absolute Artin vanishing, including the sharpening of the dimension bound to the dimension of the closure of the support, is Artin vanishing on complex affine varieties. This is an indispensable prior supplier, not a conclusion assumed from the present relative statement.

[F2]

Finite complex algebraic Whitney stratifications give finite dimension filtrations Fi with smooth pure-dimensional layers Wi=Fi∖Fi−1 on which all ordinary cohomology sheaves are local systems (Algebraically constructible complexes of analytic field sheaves and Ordinary middle perverse t structure, recollement and intersection complexes). The upper perverse support condition on an i-dimensional layer is ordinary cohomological degree at most −i, duality exchanges the upper and lower perverse aisles, DRu∗D=Ru!, ordinary restriction is exact, and support, Čech and bounded hypercohomology spectral sequences have their usual exact triangles (Actual analytic constructible sheaves admit coherent six operations, Canonical t structure on a derived category); the Axiom of Choice is assumed as in The Axiom of Choice.

[F3]

A nonempty smooth irreducible affine complex variety of dimension i has a finite map to affine i-space: Noether normalization gives algebraically independent z1,…,zd with the coordinate ring module-finite over the polynomial ring (Noether normalisation yields module finiteness over a polynomial subring) and the affine dimension theorem identifies d=i as the transcendence degree of the function field (Affine-domain dimension equals transcendence degree). Subtracting the coordinates of one chosen point makes their common zero fiber finite and nonempty.

Proof

Given: the data and exact suppliers of the Statement. We first construct a top-degree detector for nonzero local systems.

1.1F1F2F3construct

Let U be smooth irreducible affine of dimension i≥1 and let L be a nonzero finite-rank local system. By [F3] choose i functions with finite nonempty common zero set S. Local complex orientation and local constancy identify HS2i(U,L) with ⨁s∈SLs, which is nonzero, while [F1] gives H2i(U,L)=0. The support long exact sequence therefore gives H2i−1(U∖S,L)≠0. Cover U∖S by the i principal opens D(fj). Every finite intersection is affine, so [F1] bounds its ordinary cohomology by i; the Čech index is at most i−1. In total degree 2i−1 only the term Hi(D(f1⋯fi),L) can contribute, and nonvanishing of the total group forces it to be nonzero. For i=0 the detector is simply the nonzero stalk on an isolated point.

1.2F1F2inductionbaseih

The forward direction of the affine-open characterization is [F1], applied to each restriction. Conversely suppose all positive Hq(V,K) vanish. Write Ui=Y∖Fi−1 and argue downwards in i that the stalk degrees on Ui obey the upper perverse support bound. Suppose the assertion is established on all larger-dimensional layers. On Ui let A=τ≤−iK and Q=τ>−iK. On higher-dimensional layers the induction hypothesis already gives the upper perverse stalk bound, preserved by ordinary truncation; on Wi truncation makes the degree at most −i. These are exactly the upper perverse bounds for A on Ui, without any claim that Ui has dimension i. Thus on each affine V⊂Ui, [F1] and the triangle A→K→Q give Hq(V,Q)=0 for q>0. All ordinary cohomology sheaves of Q are supported on the closed smooth layer Wi⊂Ui and are local systems there.

2.1F1F2step 1.1step 1.2induction

If Q is nonzero, let b>−i be its largest nonzero cohomological degree and let L=Hb(Q)∣Wi be nonzero on a connected component. The finitely many smooth irreducible components of Wi are disjoint and closed in Ui; remove the components where L is zero and all but one nonzero component, and choose an affine open V0⊂Ui in the resulting open, meeting the retained component. Then V0∩Wi is smooth affine and L is a nonzero local system on it. Step 1.1 supplies a principal open of it with nonzero Hi(L). Since Wi∩V0 is closed in the affine V0, the defining function lifts from its coordinate-ring quotient to a function on V0; localizing the latter gives an affine V⊂Ui with Hi(V∩Wi,L)≠0. The closed embedding e:V∩Wi↪V has exact pushforward, and Q∣V=e∗e∗Q∣V because all its cohomology is supported there. Thus Ha(V,Ht(Q))=Ha(V∩Wi,Ht(Q)∣Wi). In the bounded spectral sequence Ha(V∩Wi,Ht(Q)∣Wi)⇒Ha+t(V,Q), [F1] gives a≤i and maximality of b gives t≤b. The nonzero term (i,b) has no incoming differential, since those would start at a larger t, and no outgoing differential, since those would end at a larger a. It is the sole term in its total degree i+b>0, contradicting step 1.2. Hence Q=0, completing the descending dimension induction and the converse.

3.1F1F2step 2.1algebradischarge-induction∎

Let P∈pDc≤0(X). For every affine Zariski open V⊂Y its inverse image under the affine morphism u is affine, and derived composition with [F1] gives Hq(V,Ru∗P)=Hq(u−1V,P)=0 for q>0; the characterization proved in step 2.1 therefore puts Ru∗P in the upper perverse aisle. For P in the lower aisle, apply this to DP and dualize by [F2] to obtain the claimed lower-aisle preservation by Ru!. All zero and empty cases follow from the same zero triangles.

Remarks

The local-system detector replaces the arithmetic-purity step in BBD 4.1.7-4.1.8 by the explicit relative cohomology of a complex-oriented ball, and the converse needs only the sharpened support-dimension form of absolute Artin vanishing. The relative theorem is therefore a complete local deduction from the declared absolute Artin and constructible-formalism suppliers; it does not require a separate Stein local-characterization theorem, nor a claim that ordinary direct image commutes with arbitrary nonproper fiber restriction.

LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

General projective hyperplanes decrease the defect of semismallness

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice as inherited from the algebraic dimension and Bertini suppliers. Let f:X→Y be a projective morphism of complex projective varieties with X smooth, nonempty and irreducible of dimension n. Fix a projective embedding X↪Pd with d≥1 and let Yi={y:dim⁡f−1(y)=i}. Put r(f)=max⁡Yi≠∅(2i+dim⁡Yi−n). For the universal hyperplane incidence g:X→Y×(Pd)∨ one has r(g)≤r(f)−1 if r(f)>0. If r(f)=0, g is small: it has defect zero and every positive-fiber-dimensional stratum gives a strictly negative defect contribution.

There is a nonempty Zariski open subset of the hyperplane parameter space such that every hyperplane H in it has smooth XH=X∩H and satisfies the same conclusions for fH:XH→Y: its defect is at most r(f)−1 if r(f)>0, and it is small if r(f)=0. Empty hyperplane sections are omitted from the defect computation and have zero pushforward. Successive general sections therefore lower a positive defect at every nonempty step. A finite prescribed algebraic Whitney stratification can also be met transversally by shrinking this open subset when the separately supplied stratified transversality theorem is applicable.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: the complex projective morphism f, the embedding X↪Pd, the universal incidence g, and the choice assumption of the Statement.

[F1]

Projective fibre dimension is upper semicontinuous: for a projective morphism of classical varieties the set Er={y:dim⁡Xy≥r} is closed for every integer r, with empty fibres of dimension −∞ (Projective fibre dimension is upper semicontinuous). Hence each Yi=Ei∖Ei+1 is constructible, and so is each universal fibre-dimension locus. Every constructible locus is a finite disjoint union of locally closed varieties; the dimensions below are maxima of those finitely many piece dimensions.

[F2]

For an irreducible classical variety X and a morphism f:X→Y the reduced closure Z=f(X)‾ is irreducible and dim⁡X=dim⁡Z+r, where r is the common dimension of the nonempty fibres on a nonempty open of Z; for reducible X one applies this component by component, not to the whole reducible source (Image dimension and the generic fibre formula).

[F3]

A general hyperplane in a fixed embedding of a smooth complex variety cuts out a smooth zero scheme, and the set of such hyperplanes contains a nonempty Zariski open of the dual projective space (Bertini smoothness away from the base locus). No simultaneous avoidance of every positive-dimensional fibre component is asserted.

[F4]

Let X⊆PkN be irreducible of dimension d≥1 and let f be homogeneous of positive degree not vanishing identically on X; then X∩V+(f) is nonempty and every irreducible component has dimension d−1 (Nontrivial projective hypersurface sections). Thus a nonzero hyperplane equation on an irreducible projective component of positive dimension cuts a nonempty pure codimension-one section, while a zero-dimensional component either lies in the hyperplane or has empty intersection.

[F5]

The vocabulary is classical: projective morphisms and embeddings are as in Projective classical morphisms, fibre dimensions and the loci Yi are chain dimensions of closed-point fibres as in Reduced closed-point fibres and their dimension, and the Axiom of Choice is assumed as in The Axiom of Choice.

Proof

Given: the data and choice assumption of the Statement.

1.1givenF4F5algebraconstruct

The universal incidence X={(x,H):x∈X∩H}⊆X×(Pd)∨ is a projective-space bundle of relative dimension d−1 over X: at each x the hyperplanes containing x are the linear forms vanishing at x, a rank-d subbundle of the rank-(d+1) bundle of linear forms, so the fibres are projective spaces of dimension d−1. Hence X is smooth, irreducible and of dimension n+d−1, and the fibre of g at (y,H) is f−1(y)∩H. A nonempty hyperplane cut of a projective variety of dimension i+1 has dimension i unless the hyperplane contains a top-dimensional component, in which case its dimension is i+1; this is exactly [F4] applied component by component, taking the zero-dimensional components to be either contained in H or disjoint from it.

2.1F1F2step 1.1algebra

Partition the universal locus of fibre dimension i into Ai={(y,H):y∈Yi, dim⁡(f−1(y)∩H)=i} and Bi={(y,H):y∈Yi+1, dim⁡(f−1(y)∩H)=i}; both are constructible by [F1]. For fixed y∈Yi the fibre of Ai over y consists of the hyperplanes containing at least one of the finitely many top-dimensional components of f−1(y). Such a component spans a projective linear subspace of dimension at least i, so the hyperplanes containing it form a projective subspace of the dual of dimension at most d−i−1; hence every fibre of Ai→Yi has dimension at most d−i−1, and [F2] applied to the finitely many components of Ai‾ gives dim⁡Ai≤dim⁡Yi+d−i−1. The projection Bi→Yi+1 has fibres of dimension at most d because the hyperplane parameter is free, so dim⁡Bi≤dim⁡Yi+1+d. Subtracting the source dimension n+d−1 of g from twice the fibre dimension plus these parameter dimensions gives contributions at most r(f)−i for Ai and at most r(f)−1 for Bi; for i=0 the A0 contribution is dim⁡Y0−n≤0 because dim⁡Y0≤dim⁡f(X)‾≤n by [F2].

3.1F2step 2.1algebra

If r(f)>0, both bounds in step 2.1 are at most r(f)−1, including the separately treated i=0 case, so r(g)≤r(f)−1. If r(f)=0, the bounds are strictly negative for every i>0; for i=0 the contribution is zero, attained because r(f)=0 forces generic fibre dimension zero by [F2], so g is generically finite on its image and has defect zero, while the strict bounds for positive fibre dimension prove smallness.

4.1F1F2F3F4step 1.1step 2.1step 3.1∎

For the fixed-hyperplane claim, project each of the finitely many locally closed components of the Ai and Bi to (Pd)∨; a component whose image is not dense is absent from a general parameter fibre, and for a component with dense image [F2] bounds its general parameter fibre dimension by its dimension minus d. Intersecting the finitely many resulting nonempty parameter opens with the smooth-section open of [F3] gives a nonempty Zariski open; on it the same estimates as step 2.1 hold with dim⁡Ai−d, dim⁡Bi−d and source dimension n−1 for XH, so the identical arithmetic gives the fixed-hyperplane conclusions, For iteration, a smooth nonempty hyperplane section is pure of dimension one less by [F4], but need not be irreducible. The estimates of steps 1.1 and 2.1 apply unchanged to a smooth pure-dimensional finite union: all incidence components have the same source dimension, and [F2] is applied componentwise throughout. The defect is nonnegative, since on any irreducible component of dimension m with generic fibre dimension j its image has dimension m−j, so the corresponding full fibre locus contributes at least j≥0. Thus the positive-defect inequality applies at every successive smooth nonempty section, without an irreducibility assumption on those sections. Transversality of a prescribed finite algebraic Whitney stratification is the separately supplied condition named in the Statement, not a consequence of ordinary Bertini alone.

Remarks

The defect r(f) and smallness are defined inline in the Statement; this item is their home in this pair, and the later consumer lem-projective-hodge-perverse-package-closes-under-defect-and-image-dimension-induction reads the same formula. The argument needs no "counting of constants" theorem guaranteeing that a hyperplane avoids every fibre component. The displayed computation uses dim⁡X=n+d−1 throughout; the source's typed rendition of Theorem 4.7.4 conflates dim⁡X and dim⁡X in two display lines, which does not affect this derivation.

LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedOpen item page →

Universal hyperplanes give relative weak Lefschetz and maximal pullback subobjects

Statement

Assume the inherited Axiom of Choice. Let f:X→Y be a projective map of complex varieties, with a fixed closed embedding X↪Pd and d≥1. Set Y′=Y×(Pd)∨, p:Y′→Y, X′=X×(Pd)∨, p′:X′→X, and let i:X↪X′ be the universal hyperplane incidence. Write g=(f×1)i, and for K∈Perv⁡(X;k) put M=i∗p′∗K[d−1]. Then M is perverse and the restriction/Gysin maps give isomorphisms p∗pHl(Rf∗K)[d]→pHl+1(Rg∗M) for l≤−2 and monomorphisms for l=−1, with dual isomorphisms for l≥2 and epimorphisms for l=1. In particular p∗pH−1(Rf∗K)[d] identifies with the largest perverse subobject of pH0(Rg∗M) belonging to the essential image of p∗[d], and p∗pH1(Rf∗K)[d] with the largest such quotient.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: the projective map, the fixed embedding, the perverse sheaf K, and the inherited choice assumption.

[F1]

The affine one-sided exactness supplier Affine morphisms have one-sided perverse exactness says that for an affine morphism u, Ru∗ sends the perverse upper aisle pD≤0 into itself and Ru! sends the perverse lower aisle pD≥0 into itself; these are the exact directions used below.

[F2]

The noncharacteristic and smooth pullback supplier Smooth and noncharacteristic complex pullbacks are perverse-exact says that p′∗[d] is perverse-exact and that on complexes constructible for the transverse product Whitney stratification of the universal hyperplane i∗[−1] is perverse-exact with i!K′=i∗K′[−2]. Choose a finite algebraic Whitney stratification supporting K by Complex algebraic varieties and maps admit compatible finite stratifications. Transversality holds because on every stratum S of X the incidence over S is a smooth projective-space bundle of codimension one inside S×(Pd)∨; the relevant vocabulary is that of Algebraically constructible complexes of analytic field sheaves.

[F3]

The constructed perverse heart has finite length, negative derived Hom between heart objects vanishes, simple objects are intersection complexes of simple local systems, and the six operations have proper base change, projection and duality adjunctions (Ordinary middle perverse t structure, recollement and intersection complexes, Actual analytic constructible sheaves admit coherent six operations, Canonical t structure on a derived category). The projective-space cohomology basis is supplied by The complex tautological Euler class restricts to the projective-fiber generator with Cellular cochains compute cohomology with local coefficients, and the Axiom of Choice is assumed as in The Axiom of Choice.

Proof

Given: the data and formal suppliers of the Statement.

1.1F1F2F3construct

By [F2], p′∗K[d] is perverse and i∗[−1] is perverse-exact on these product strata, so M=i∗p′∗K[d−1] is perverse. Let j:X′∖X↪X′ and u=(f×1)j. Over an affine chart of the hyperplane parameter space the complement of the incidence in Pd is an affine d-space bundle, and X′∖X is closed in the corresponding bundle over Y′; thus u is affine. Apply R(f×1)! to the localization triangle j!j∗p′∗K[d]→p′∗K[d]→i∗i∗p′∗K[d]→. By [F1] the first term lies in the perverse lower aisle, so it has no negative perverse cohomology; by proper base change and [F2] the second is p∗Rf∗K[d] and the third is Rg∗M[1]. The long exact perverse sequence gives the restriction isomorphisms and the monomorphism. Dualizing the whole construction and using Di∗=i!D, i!K′=i∗K′[−2] from [F2] gives the Gysin isomorphisms and the epimorphism for l=1.

1.2F2F3algebraconstruct

The projective-space cohomology formula gives Rp∗p∗T=⨁a=0dT[−2a] for every constructible complex T, and the identical formula with d−1 holds for p′i:X→X. To justify the formula as a morphism and not only stalk ranks, cup powers of the tautological Euler class pulled back from (Pd)∨ define the map from the direct sum, and on every fibre its map is the usual projective-space cohomology basis, hence an isomorphism by proper base change; the integral power basis is The complex tautological Euler class restricts to the projective-fiber generator, and tensoring the finite cellular cochain complex with k preserves the basis by Cellular cochains compute cohomology with local coefficients. For heart objects A,B, adjunction therefore identifies Hom⁡(p∗A[d],p∗B[d]) with Hom⁡(A,B): all terms Hom⁡(A,B[−2a]) for a>0 vanish by [F3].

2.1F2F3step 1.2constructalgebra

Write F=p∗[d]. For the product projection p, the normal slices to S×Pd are precisely the normal slices to S. Thus the stalk and costalk boundary conditions characterizing intermediate extension in [F3] are preserved: on a boundary stratum of dimension s their strict bounds q<−s and q>−s become q<−(s+d) and q>−(s+d) after the shift [d]. On the dense open, pullback is the shifted pulled-back local system. The no-boundary characterization in [F3] therefore shows that F takes IC⁡S(L) to IC⁡S×Pd(p∗L), with both intersection complexes normalized by their respective support dimensions. The local system p∗L remains irreducible: a sub-local-system restricts along the section y↦(y,H0) to a sub-local-system of L, hence to zero or all of L. Its rank is constant on each connected projective-space fibre (any two points lie on a projective line), so those two alternatives give zero or all of p∗L on the whole product. Hence F is exact, fully faithful by step 1.2, and preserves simples. Every composition factor of F(A) is therefore a pulled-back simple; for a subobject B⊆F(A) choose a simple F(S)⊆B, lift its inclusion to S⊆A by full faithfulness, and induct on B/F(S)⊆F(A/S). The lifted inclusion of the resulting base object into A/S has a preimage in A, whose exact image under F is B. This proves the image of F is closed under subobjects and quotients. The derived right adjoint Rp∗[−d] preserves the lower aisle: for E∈pD≥0 and B∈pD≤−1, adjunction gives Hom⁡(B,Rp∗E[−d])=Hom⁡(F(B),E)=0. Thus Rp∗ sends pD≥q into pD≥q−d. Its heart right adjoint is r=pH−dRp∗, since the positive-degree truncation of Rp∗C[−d] has no Hom from a heart object. The analogous left adjoint is ℓ=pHdRp!, using p!=p∗[2d]. Full faithfulness gives rF=1. The kernel of the counit Fr(C)→C lies in the image of F by subobject closure, and applying the left-exact r shows that kernel is zero, by the adjunction identity r(εC)=1. Every subobject F(B)↪C factors through this counit by adjunction. Consequently Fr(C) is exactly the largest subobject coming from Y; duality gives the largest quotient Fℓ(C).

3.1F2F3step 1.2step 2.1constructalgebra

Put T=Rf∗K, V=R(f×1)∗p′∗K and U=Rg∗i∗p′∗K. The graph of (f,X↪Pd) is a closed embedding a:X↪Y×Pd and f=qa, where q is the projection. Closed pushforward is perverse-exact directly from the two stratum inequalities in [F3]: on strata inside the image its stalks and costalks are those of K, and on the complement they vanish. Applying the lower-aisle calculation of step 2.1 to q therefore gives T=Rq∗a∗K∈pD≥−d. Under the cup-power bases of step 1.2, the map Rp∗V→Rp∗U is a matrix (1,β):⨁a=0d−1T[−2a]⊕T[−2d]→⨁a=0d−1T[−2a]: restriction carries each of the first d parameter-class powers to the identical power on the incidence bundle, while the last power may be a linear combination involving base classes. Changing coordinates by (x,z)↦(x+βz,z) identifies this map with projection. Its discarded summand T[−2d] lies in pD≥d, so the map induces isomorphisms in every perverse degree below d, including degrees −1 and 0 for all d≥1. This uses no decomposition of T into its perverse cohomology.

4.1F2F3step 1.1step 2.1step 3.1constructalgebra∎

Set n=d−1. Step 1.1 gives an isomorphism L=pτ<nV≃pτ<nU and a monomorphism ι:pHnV↪pHnU. Apply Rp∗ to the two triangles L→V→pτ≥nV→ and L→U→pτ≥nU→. Their five-term exact sequences are pH−1Rp∗L→pH−1Rp∗V→pH−1Rp∗pτ≥nV→pH0Rp∗L→pH0Rp∗V and the same sequence for U. The first and fourth vertical maps are identities, and the second and fifth are isomorphisms by step 3.1; the five lemma proves that the middle map is an isomorphism. For either W=V or W=U, the triangle (pHnW)[−n]→pτ≥nW→pτ≥n+1W→ has last term whose Rp∗ lies in pD≥n+1−d=pD≥0, by step 2.1. Its perverse cohomology in degrees −2 and −1 vanishes. The resulting exact sequence gives, naturally in W, pH−1(Rp∗pτ≥nW)≃pH−1−n(Rp∗pHnW)=r(pHnW), since −1−n=−d. Thus r(ι) is an isomorphism. Proper base change and exact F give pHnV=F(pH−1T), so its right adjoint is pH−1T. Adjunction factors ι as the counit Fr(pHnU)→pHnU preceded by the isomorphism F(r(ι)). By step 2.1 its image is exactly the largest pullback subobject of pHnU=pH0(Rg∗M). Apply this result to DK and dualize using [F2] and [F3]; the middle object is dualized, perverse degrees change sign, and largest subobject becomes largest quotient F(pH1T). This proves every assertion.

Remarks

The localization, affineness, transversality and duality argument is Lemma 4.7.6 and Proposition 4.7.8 of de Cataldo–Migliorini. The maximal-subobject assertion is their Proposition 4.7.9 and BBD §5.4.11–5.4.13. The proof above derives the lower perverse amplitude from smooth adjunction, derives the required full pushforward comparison from the projective-bundle cup-power matrix, and spells out both truncation exact sequences and the equality −1−(d−1)=−d. No pure-sheaf, arithmetic-comparison or decomposition-theorem input is used.

5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

None yet.

Sources