Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

✓ 2 results · all verified · 0 also independently AI-judged
Every result on this page is machine-checked by a proof checker and read in full and owner-audited; the judge is an additional, independent cross-model AI review of the proofs. The 2 not AI-judged were verified by owner audit (typically over a confirmed judge false positive), not failures.

Cohomological Hall Algebras and Quiver Correspondences: Examples and Counterexamples

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

These examples test the A-page conventions at a loop quiver, where extension fibers need not be finite, and at an isolated critical point, where local monodromy is visible. The general quotient-stack operation and vanishing-cycle proofs are supplied separately on the A page; these examples illustrate their conventions.

Companion: cohomological-hall-algebras-and-quiver-correspondences.

Reading prerequisites

Read cohomological-hall-algebras-and-quiver-correspondences first. In particular, use its subrepresentation-first exact-sequence convention and its distinction between ordinary and on-shell potential-dependent CoHAs.

Worked examples

One-loop quiver in dimension two

For the Jordan quiver with dimensions 1,1, the exact-sequence atlas is the incidence space of pairs (A,L) with L⊂C2 a line and A(L)⊆L. In an adapted basis, A=(λc0μ). The block extension coordinate and unipotent splitting action both have dimension one, so q has stack-relative dimension zero. The fiber of p over a scalar matrix is all of P1, while a diagonal matrix with distinct eigenvalues has two invariant lines and a nontrivial 2×2 Jordan block has one. Thus the forgetful map is proper without having finite fibers. The example uses the specified change-of-basis action to fix the sign of the off-diagonal coordinate.

The potential x2

For the one-loop quiver in dimension one, W=x2 gives the function z↦z2. Its only critical point is zero; a small nonzero fiber has two points, so reduced zeroth cohomology is one-dimensional. A positive loop around the critical value exchanges the roots and acts by −1 on the difference of the two point classes. With the exact normalized coefficient Vf=ϕf[−1], that reduced zeroth cohomology appears in coefficient degree one; V0Q=Q supplies the unit convention. This checks the stated local monodromy normalization. It does not prove equivariant Thom–Sebastiani, proper pushforward compatibility, or associativity for the standard critical CoHA.

Boundaries and sources

The examples check the exact sequence, properness, zero-dimensional stack shift, critical locus, and local monodromy conventions. Neither example identifies ordinary Ringel–Hall multiplication with CoHA multiplication or establishes a general CoHA–Yangian comparison.

The exact source passages and dispositions are recorded in the companion batch notes and source coverage.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

None yet.

5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passOpen item page →

The one-loop quiver extension correspondence in dimension two

Example

Let Q have one vertex and one loop x:

\begin{tikzpicture}[>=stealth]
  \node[circle,draw,inner sep=2.5pt] (v) at (0,0) {$\bullet$};
  \draw[->] (v) edge[loop above] node {$x$} (v);
\end{tikzpicture}

Take a=b=1. Then Rep⁡Q(1)=C and Rep⁡Q(2)=Mat⁡2(C). The group GL⁡1 acts trivially on Rep⁡Q(1), while GL⁡2 acts on Rep⁡Q(2) by conjugation. The extension atlas consists of pairs (A,L) with L a line in C2 and A(L)⊆L. In a basis adapted to L, A=(λc0μ). The map q records the scalars (λ,μ), and the map p forgets L.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, the one-vertex, one-loop quiver, the dimension vectors a=b=1, and the extension correspondence of Representation stacks and exact-sequence correspondences of a finite quiver.

[F1]

Representation stacks and exact-sequence correspondences of a finite quiver: for the loop arrow the off-diagonal extension coordinate belongs to Hom⁡(C,C), and q records the diagonal blocks while p forgets the subrepresentation.

[F2]

The quiver exact-sequence correspondence is smooth and proper: the map q has relative stack dimension ∑h:i→jbiaj−∑iaibi, and p is proper.

[A1]

The Axiom of Choice: AC is inherited through the smoothness and properness supplier [F2] and the projective flag-variety supplier [F3]; the matrix and invariant-line calculations are choice-free.

Verification

1.1F1given

A one-loop representation of dimension one is a scalar, and change of basis by GL⁡1 fixes it because conjugation by a scalar is trivial. A dimension-two representation is a 2×2 matrix with conjugation action. Preserving a chosen line makes the matrix upper triangular in an adapted basis, as displayed.

1.2F1F2algebra

For this quiver the off-diagonal rank is e=1 and the unipotent vertex-block rank is u=1; hence q has relative stack dimension e−u=0, agreeing with −χQ(1,1)=0. For the splitting change represented by t∈Hom⁡(C,C), the change-of-basis matrix gt=(1t01) acts by A↦gtAgt−1, sending c to c+(μ−λ)t. Thus when λ≠μ the extension coordinate is removed by a unique splitting change, whereas when λ=μ it is unchanged; this is consistent with a zero-dimensional stack morphism, not a claim that all extension fibers are points.

1.3F3given

The fiber of p at a scalar matrix λI is all of P1, so it is positive-dimensional. For a diagonal matrix with distinct eigenvalues, an invariant line must be an eigenspace, giving exactly two points. For a non-scalar Jordan matrix λI+N with N2=0 and rank⁡N=1, an invariant line is N-stable; the nilpotent map induced on a one-dimensional line is zero, so the line lies in ker⁡N, which is the unique invariant line. These fibers agree with the closed incidence projection to Mat⁡2(C)×P1 and do not affect properness.

2.1A1F2F3step 1.3∎

The incidence equations A(L)⊆L are closed in Mat⁡2(C)×P1, so the forgetful map p is projective and proper by [F2]. The example includes a loop and checks why stack-relative dimension and properness must be read from the specified correspondence, not from finiteness of its fibers. AC is inherited through [A1].

ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passOpen item page →

The trace potential x squared on the one-loop quiver

Example

For the one-vertex, one-loop quiver with loop x, take the potential W=x2. In dimension one, the representation space is C, the group GL⁡1 acts trivially, and the trace function is W1(z)=z2. Its critical locus is the origin, with critical value zero.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: the one-loop quiver, the potential W=x2, and the local Milnor-fiber normalization in Quiver potentials and realized monodromic coefficient data.

[F1]

Quiver potentials and realized monodromic coefficient data: the dimension-one trace of a loop potential is its value on the scalar endomorphism, and an isolated critical point has vanishing-cycle stalk given by reduced cohomology of its local Milnor fiber, with monodromy from a positive loop.

[F2]

A quiver potential trace is additive on exact sequences: the trace of the potential on an extension is the sum of its traces on the subrepresentation and quotient.

[F3]

Normalized rational vanishing cycles have coherent correspondence operations: the exact standard normalization is Hk(VfQ)x=H~k−1(Fx;Q) and V0Q=Q; positive-loop continuation gives its monodromy.

Verification

1.1F1givenalgebra

The trace definition in [F1] gives W1(z)=z2. Its differential is dW1=2z dz; since the coefficient field has characteristic zero, this vanishes exactly at z=0, where W1(0)=0. Thus the critical locus and critical value are as stated.

2.1F1F3step 1.1construct

For any sufficiently small ϵ≠0, the local Milnor fiber z2=ϵ in a disk about zero consists of the two distinct points ϵ and −ϵ. Its reduced zeroth cohomology is Q, generated by the difference of the two point classes. When ϵ goes once around zero, the two roots exchange, so this generator maps to its negative. The normalized vanishing-cycle stalk Φ is therefore one-dimensional in degree one, with monodromy −1, by [F3]. The homological coefficient is its normalized equivariant Verdier dual as in [F1]; it must not be confused with an unshifted Milnor cohomology stalk.

3.1F2F3step 2.1∎

This local calculation agrees with the degree-one normalization of [F3] and, under Thom–Sebastiani, with degree two for x2+y2. Trace additivity [F2] gives the extension value convention. The full operation package is proved by its separate supplier; this example verifies the specified local fibre, degree and monodromy.

Sources