How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The Degenerate Ariki Categorification Theorem — Examples
1 · Prerequisites
- Abelian Categories
- Absolute and Conditional Convergence; Rearrangement; Products
- Adjunctions Units and Counits
- Affine Algebraic Sets and Coordinate Rings
- Affine Group Schemes, Hopf Algebras, and Rational Representations
- Affine Schemes and the Structure Sheaf
- Algebraic Closure, Embeddings, and Separability
- Algebraic Differentials Separability and Smooth Local Presentations
- Algebraic Extensions, Extension Degree, and Finite Fields
- Algebraic Group Actions, Orbits, Stabilizers, and Controlled Quotients
- Algebraic Zariski Main for Quasi-Finite Morphisms
- Applications of the Fundamental Group
- Arakawa–Suzuki Functors and Higher-Level Schur–Weyl Duality
- Arc Length and Rectifiable Curves
- Artinian Rings and Length
- Associated Primes and Primary Decomposition
- Balanced Triples and Global Crystal Bases
- Binary Operations, Monoids, Groups and Subgroups
- Blocks Defect Groups and the Brauer Homomorphism
- Bounded Bimodule Complexes and Derived Tensor
- Bounded Linear Operators and Quotient Spaces
- Bounded Variation and the Riemann–Stieltjes Integral
- Braided and Symmetric Monoidal Categories
- Bruhat Decomposition and Flags over Finite Fields
- Canonical Roots, Signs, and Faithful Reflections
- Cardinal Arithmetic, Cofinality and the Alephs
- Cartan Subalgebras and Root Space Decompositions
- Categorical Braid Actions and Decategorification
- Categories, Functors and Natural Transformations
- Category O Finiteness Duality and Blocks
- Chain Complexes and Homology
- Chain Conditions, Semisimple Modules and the Wedderburn–Artin Theorem
- Chain Homotopy and the Homotopy Category
- Chains, Antichains, Sperner and Dilworth
- Characters and the Orthogonality Relations
- Classical Affine Varieties: Coordinate Rings, Morphisms, and Rational Maps
- Clifford Theory over Normal Subgroups
- Compactness
- Compactness in Metric Spaces
- Completeness, Completion, and Uniform Continuity
- Complex Differentiability and the Cauchy–Riemann Equations
- Complex Power Series and Analytic Functions
- Composition Series, the Jordan–Hölder Theorem and Solvable Groups
- Congruences, the Integers Modulo n and the Chinese Remainder Theorem
- Conjugacy in Sₙ, Generation, and the Simplicity of Aₙ
- Connectedness
- Constant Rank, Submersions, Immersions and Regular Level Sets
- Construction of the Natural Numbers
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Cauchy Sequences
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Dedekind Cuts
- Continuity, IVT, EVT, and Uniform Continuity
- Contour Integration
- Cosets, Index and Lagrange's Theorem
- Countability and Uncountability
- Countability Axioms and Cardinal Functions
- Covering Spaces and Lifting
- Coxeter Presentations, Exchange, and Reduced Word Theorems
- Cyclic Groups and Direct Products
- Cyclotomic Hecke and Quiver Hecke Algebras
- Cyclotomic KLR Algebras and Highest-Weight Categorification
- Dedekind Domains and Ideal Classes
- Delta Functors and Universality
- Depth and Cohen Macaulay Modules
- Derived Categories
- Derived Functors
- Determinants of Matrices over a Commutative Ring
- Diagonalisation and the Minimal Polynomial
- Diagonals Separated Morphisms and Valuative Uniqueness
- Dimension Constructible Images and Dimensions of Fibres
- Distributions Integral Manifolds and the Frobenius Theorem
- Divided Powers, Integral Forms, and Quantum Highest Weights
- Divisibility, Euclidean Domains, Principal Ideal Domains and Unique Factorisation
- Divisibility, Greatest Common Divisors and Bézout's Identity
- Dual Spaces, Bilinear and Quadratic Forms, and Sylvester's Law of Inertia
- Eigenvalues, Eigenvectors and the Characteristic Polynomial
- Euclidean Ordinary Differential Equations with Smooth Dependence
- Exactness and the Member Calculus
- Ext and Balanced Resolutions
- Exterior Powers, Orientation and Hodge Duality
- Fibre Products Base Change and Scheme Theoretic Fibres
- Filters and Ultrafilters
- Finite Averaging and Character-Theory Prerequisites
- Finite Counting, Factorials and Binomial Coefficients
- Finite Dimensional Normed Spaces and Riesz Lemma
- Finite Fields and Cyclotomic Extensions
- Finite Proper and Projective Morphisms
- Finite Weyl Invariants, Bruhat Order, and Kostant Harmonics
- Flat Smooth and Etale Morphisms
- Flatness and Faithful Flatness
- Formal Power Series
- Foundations of the Real Numbers for Analysis
- Free Groups and Presentations
- Free Modules, Exact Sequences, Projective and Injective Modules
- Fubini and Change of Variables
- Fundamental Trigonometric Identities
- Galois Orbits and Descent of Simple Finite-Group Modules
- Garside Structure, Normal Forms, and the Center
- Gaussian Elimination, Elementary Matrices and Reduced Row Echelon Form
- Goursat's Theorem and Cauchy's Theorem in a Convex Domain
- Graded Bimodules and Tensor Functors
- Grothendieck Groups and Graded Cartan Pairings
- Group Actions, Orbits, Stabilisers and Cayley's Theorem
- Group Homomorphisms and the Isomorphism Theorems
- Group Schemes of Finite Type over a Field
- Groups of Multiplicative Type and Arithmetic Tori
- Harish Chandra Isomorphism Casimir and Central Characters
- Hecke Markov Traces and Polynomial Link Invariants
- Hereditary and Productive Behaviour of the Separation Axioms
- Highest Weight Theory for Complex Semisimple Lie Algebras
- Hilbert Space Geometry and Riesz Representation
- Holomorphic Functions of Several Complex Variables
- Homogeneous Resultants and Projective Intersection Length
- Homological Gaussian Elimination
- Homomorphisms Between Verma Modules and Linkage
- Homotopy and Homotopy Equivalence
- Ideals, Quotient Rings and the Isomorphism Theorems for Rings
- Induced Representations, Frobenius Reciprocity and Applications
- Inner Product Spaces, Gram-Schmidt, Projections and Adjoints
- Integrable Highest Weight Kac Moody Modules
- Integral Extensions and Going Up
- Integral Specht Modules and Modular Simple Modules
- Inverse Limits and Noetherian Completion
- Jucys–Murphy Elements and Seminormal Forms
- Kac Moody Algebras from Generalized Cartan Matrices
- Kahler Differentials Conormal Sequences and Infinitesimal Lifting
- Kashiwara Operators and Crystal Lattices
- Kazhdan–Lusztig Bases, Polynomials, and Cells
- KLR Algebras, Induction, and Quantum-Serre Categorification
- Koszul Complexes and Regular Sequences
- Kronecker Coefficients and Internal Products
- Krull Dimension and Height Theorems
- Lie Algebra Representations, Enveloping Algebras, and PBW
- Lie Algebras and Infinitesimal Group Schemes
- Lie Groups, Invariant Fields, and the Exponential Map
- Lie Subgroups, Actions, and Homogeneous Spaces
- Limits and Colimits
- Limits of Real Functions
- limsup, liminf, and Subsequential Limits
- Line Integrals and the Gradient Theorem
- Linear Independence, Bases and Dimension
- Linear Transformations, Rank-Nullity and Quotient Spaces
- Localisation of Modules and Support
- Long Exact Sequences in Homology
- Manifolds with Boundary Collars and Orientations
- Mapping Cones Cylinders and Chain Triangles
- Maschke's Theorem, Complete Reducibility and the Structure of k[G]
- Matrices, the Matrix of a Linear Map, and Change of Basis
- Metric Spaces
- Mixed Partials, Taylor Formulae, and Extrema
- Modular Representations and Projective Covers
- Modules over a Principal Ideal Domain and the Canonical Forms
- Modules, Submodules, Quotient Modules and the Isomorphism Theorems
- Monotone Functions, Discontinuities, and Continuity Sets
- Monotone Sequences, Bolzano-Weierstrass, and Cauchy Completeness
- Morphisms Local Rings and Rational Maps of Affine Varieties
- Noether Normalisation and Nullstellensatz
- Noetherian Rings and Hilbert Basis
- Nonaffine Algebraic Groups, Barsotti-Chevalley, and Abelian Varieties
- Normal Subgroups and Quotient Groups
- Normed and Banach Spaces
- Order, Zorn's Lemma, and the Axiom of Choice
- Ordinal Arithmetic and the First Uncountable Ordinal
- Ordinals, Cardinals, and Transfinite Recursion
- Ordinary Hecke Specht Polytabloids and Signed Murphy Comparison
- Parabolic Category O and Fock-Space Bases
- Parabolic Subgroups and Double Coset Geometry
- Partitions of Unity and Paracompactness
- Permutation Statistics, Inversions and Eulerian Numbers
- pi: the Equivalent Characterizations
- Picard-Lindelöf and First-Order Ordinary Differential Equations
- Polynomial Rings, the Division Algorithm and Roots
- Power Series and Real-Analytic Functions
- Preadditive and Additive Categories and Biproducts
- Presheaves Sheaves Stalks and Sheafification
- Prime Spectra and Radicals
- Primes, Euclid's Lemma and the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic
- Principal Series Representations of GL N over a Finite Field
- Products Segre and Veronese Embeddings and Grassmannians
- Proj Projective Schemes Twisting Sheaves and Ampleness
- Projective Algebraic Sets Projective Morphisms and Cones
- Projective and Injective Resolutions
- Projective Functors and the Soergel Functor in Category O
- Projectives Standard Filtrations and Bgg Reciprocity
- Properties of the Integral and the Working FTC
- Quantized Enveloping Algebras and Quantum Serre Relations
- Quantum Affine Type A and Level-One Fock Space
- Quasi Coherent and Coherent Sheaves and Vector Bundles
- Rank Theorems and Embedded Submanifolds
- Real Forms and Reflection Geometry
- Rees Modules Artin Rees and Hilbert Samuel Theory
- Reflective Subcategories and the Adjoint Functor Theorems
- Regular Local Rings and Homological Dimension
- Relations, Functions, and Quotients
- Rings, Subrings, Integral Domains and Fields
- Rⁿ as a Normed Space; Vector-Valued Functions
- Root Systems, Dynkin Diagrams, and the Cartan-Killing Classification
- Roots, Rational Powers, and Classical Inequalities
- Rouquier Complexes and Categorical Braid Relations
- Schemes Subschemes and Morphisms Locally of Finite Type
- Semisimple Lie Algebras, Cohomology, and Levi Theory
- Separation Axioms: the Hierarchy
- Sequences and Limits
- Sequences and Series of Functions; Uniform Convergence
- Series: Convergence and the Nonnegative Tests
- Sheaf Operations Exactness Ringed Spaces and Module Pullback
- Simple Field Extensions and the Construction of the Complex Numbers
- Sine, Cosine, and the Definition of Pi
- Singular and Parabolic Kazhdan–Lusztig Theory
- Smooth Manifolds and Smooth Maps
- Smooth Partitions of Unity and Exhaustions
- Smooth Vector Bundles and Sections
- Soergel Intersection Forms and Hodge Theory
- Solvability by Radicals and Kummer Theory
- Solvable and Nilpotent Lie Algebras
- Specht Modules and the Irreducibles of the Symmetric Group
- Splitting Fields
- Subobject Lattices Generators and the Grothendieck Axioms
- Subspaces, Products, and Quotients
- Suprema and Infima
- Sylow's Theorems, p-Groups and Nilpotent Groups
- Symmetric Groups, Cycle Decomposition and the Sign Homomorphism
- Symmetric Polynomials and the Fundamental Theorem of Symmetric Functions
- Tangent Cotangent and the Differential
- Tensor and Fusion Categories
- Tensor Coherence and Algebraic Descent
- Tensor Products of Modules
- Tensor-Product Crystals and Highest-Weight Crystal Uniqueness
- The BGG Resolution
- The Branching Rule and the Young Graph
- The Burau Representations
- The Cantor Set, Baire Category, and Measure Zero in ℝ
- The Complex Exponential and Euler's Formula
- The Degenerate Ariki Categorification Theorem
- The Derivative and the Mean Value Theorems
- The Determinant of a Linear Operator, Cofactors and Cramer's Rule
- The Diagram Lemmas in an Abelian Category
- The Exponential Function
- The Field of Fractions and Localisation
- The Fundamental Group
- The Fundamental Theorem of Algebra
- The Fundamental Theorem of Finite Abelian Groups
- The Fundamental Theorems of Calculus
- The Galois Correspondence
- The Group Algebra and Representations of Finite Groups
- The Holomorphic Inverse Function Theorem and Weierstrass Preparation
- The Hook Length Formula and Rsk Correspondence
- The Identity Theorem, the Maximum Principle and the Open Mapping Theorem
- The Inverse and Implicit Function Theorems
- The Inverse Function Theorem Completed
- The Kazhdan–Lusztig Character and Multiplicity Theorem
- The Logarithm and General Powers
- The Riemann Integral in Rᵐ and Jordan Content
- The Riemann Integral: Definition and Integrability
- The Spectral Theorem, Positive Operators and Singular Value Decomposition
- The Topology of Euclidean Space
- The Total Derivative in ℝᵐ → ℝⁿ
- The Weyl Kac Character Formula
- The Winding Number and the Global Cauchy Theorem
- The ZFC Axioms and the Basic Set Constructions
- Topological Spaces and Continuity
- Topology of ℝ
- Tor Flatness and Global Dimension
- Triangularisation, Generalised Eigenspaces and Jordan Canonical Form
- Triangulated Categories
- Type-A Hecke Specht Modules and Cellular Bases
- Type-A Soergel Bimodules and Hecke Categorification
- Uniform Spaces: the Three Definitions
- Unipotent and Solvable Groups and Borel Fixed Points
- Universal Coefficients and Kunneth Theorems
- Universal Properties, Representables and the Yoneda Lemma
- Valuation Rings and Discrete Valuation Rings
- Vector Fields Flows and Lie Derivatives
- Vector Spaces, Linear Subspaces, Span and Direct Sums
- Verma Modules and Shapovalov Forms
- Weyl Character and Multiplicity Formulas
- Yoneda Extensions and Homological Dimension
- Young Diagrams Tableaux and Permutation Modules
- Zariski Tangent Spaces, Regular Points, Smoothness, and Bertini
- Zariski Topology on Prime Spectra
2 · Summary
Objective. This companion page works the degenerate Ariki categorification theorem of the-degenerate-ariki-categorification-theorem on explicit small windows. The decomposition example computes the full transition and projection dictionary on the two-factor Fock space with , including the inverse chart, the projected simple vector and the height-two block decomposition. The projective/simple example contrasts composition multiplicities with the Cartan Hom pairing in the same block, verifies cover self-duality through the symmetric trace, and exhibits the index-two ground-generated integral lattice inside the full costandard lattice. The charge-reversal example displays the complete height-at-most-two window for : the eight ambient monomials, the genuine standard and reverse-standard labels, the height-two algebra , the projected half-sums, the sign action and the full tables of Young and signed Young images. The counterexample records why the degenerate theorem may not be transported to nondegenerate Hecke algebras at roots of unity, using the level-one specialization at against the semisimple degenerate quotient. Every item here is a dependency leaf: it consumes the parent page and its established prerequisites, and nothing outside this pair depends on anything homed here. No equality of a supported cut with the whole cyclotomic algebra, and no unprojected monomial used as a simple class, appears anywhere on this page.
3 · Logical flowchart
4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs
None yet.
5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements
Degenerate Ariki decomposition numbers in small rank
Example
Assume inherited AC The Axiom of Choice for the categorification and based-module identifications; the explicit finite calculations below are choice-free.
Take , so , level and with charge . Here the tower means the -SUPPORTED central cut, not the full degree- cyclotomic algebra. The Fock space is with monomials (The higher-level wedge-tensor Fock module), and , with source Bruhat order . Write for the monomial, for the normalized highest projection and as in The dual-canonical, canonical and quasi-canonical Fock bases. In the source parameter (the library parameter is ),
and , so the FULL ambient -matrix is the inverse of the -in- matrix, with diagonal and ; it is not its transpose. Moreover and . The actual projection is , , , and , ; in particular at parameter one , not the unprojected .
The decomposition matrix at parameter one has rows and columns :
Thus , and : the nonstandard Specht label has a nonzero decomposition entry, but there is no simple . If denotes , it is defined for all four columns, but only is a basis, and the displayed matrix is not an invertible unitriangular square matrix. The supported blocks are , and at respectively, with simple dimensions ; these are all simples of this finite- tower and higher supported degrees vanish. The whole degree- algebra has two additional adjacent-residue blocks, retained in the companion showcase. All displayed Specht decomposition entries are or (the relevant Weyl group is ).
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Assume inherited AC The Axiom of Choice for the invoked suppliers. The data , , charge , the Fock monomial and projection dictionary of The dual-canonical, canonical and quasi-canonical Fock bases and Standard tableau monomials form a basis of the highest weight Fock submodule, and the decomposition dictionary at parameter one of Degenerate Specht decomposition numbers are canonical basis coefficients at one. We verify the displayed transition, projection, decomposition and block statements.
At parameter one, for every Specht label and every simple label one has , where is defined by , and the matrix is the inverse of the -in- chart, not its transpose (Degenerate Specht decomposition numbers are canonical basis coefficients at one).
The simple classes of the supported tower are indexed by and the Specht classes satisfy , the identification being exact and compatible with the residue functors (The degenerate Ariki categorification theorem).
Verification
The four monomials and the label sets. The finite alphabet is and each charge-zero factor is its one-box natural module. Hence its tensor-square basis is . Weakly increasing rows select , and weakly decreasing rows select , so these are respectively and ; the mixed Bruhat order is . The actual coordinate weights are ; subtracting each from the vacuum weight gives contents . In particular and : residue sequences have length equal to tower degree, independently of the two tensor factors.
The transition vectors and the reciprocal convention. On this mixed space the ordinary Fock bar is and , with coefficient bar . Direct substitution shows that and are bar fixed in their respective positive- and negative-power triangular charts; the endpoints and equal their monomials. Thus , and the ambient inverse-chart coefficient is . Its row gives . Under these same formulas become , and ; reciprocating the parameter does not transpose the inverse transition matrix.
The normalized projection. The source coproduct gives and . Hence lies in the ground-generated constituent and is fixed by its normalized projection. The ground highest vector is ; , so is not highest. The same coproduct gives , and , so both and kill . Its weight is zero for , hence it spans a trivial constituent, complementary to the three-dimensional ground constituent since and are linearly independent. Projection onto the ground constituent along this line is a module map fixing the ground, so this directly constructs the normalized projection and its off-standard kernel . Since , applying the projection gives and . The endpoints are fixed, and . At this is the half-sum . All divisions here take place over ; they do not identify the projected costandard lattice with the ambient integral monomial lattice.
The supported blocks. Set , , . The defining relations of The degenerate cyclotomic Hecke algebra give , , , and in the relevant degree; from and the cross relations one obtains , hence , and reducing the relation decreases the -exponent while killing -exponents at least , so the eight words span the degree- algebra. Map these generators to on with and the swap matrix, to on , and to on ; direct matrix computation verifies , , , and in all three factors. The central element has images , and , and the Hermite polynomials , map to the three separate identities; each factor is generated by its images of and , so the map from the span of the eight words onto the eight-dimensional product is surjective and hence, by the spanning bound, an isomorphism. The spectral content cut keeps the factor at content and discards the adjacent-content factors, so the supported degree- block is with simple dimension ; degree one is with simple dimension at content , and degree zero is . To verify vanishing independently of categorification, suppose an all-zero-residue supported module exists in degree at least three. Its restriction to the first two strands lies in the displayed factor, hence and . Since commutes with , it also commutes with . The affine recursion gives . But a commuting sum of a square-zero operator and an involution has generalized eigenvalues only : on the two eigenspaces it is , each invertible with inverse . This contradicts the nilpotence required by residue zero for . Every nonzero finite-dimensional algebra has its nonzero regular module, so no such supported algebra exists in degree three or higher.
The decomposition matrix by intrinsic modules. The intrinsic affine-induced Specht presentation in Schur functor images of standard, simple, projective and tilting objects gives, for either single-box label or , the degree-one module ; the two different singleton components have the same charge zero. For , with one box in each component, it gives , since the inducing algebra is the polynomial algebra on the two strand variables and both act as zero on its one-dimensional inducing module. In the three factors of step 2.2, generate the whole left ideal in and because ; in the matrix factor , so the quotient is . Here consists of matrices with first column zero, and the first-column map identifies the quotient with the defining simple . The degree-zero Specht is . Thus each of these four Spechts is the indicated simple, directly giving the displayed multiplicity matrix. Independently step 1.2 gives and identity on standard columns, so these actual multiplicities agree with [F1]. There is one simple in each of the three supported blocks by step 2.2, so there is no additional simple . The standard square submatrix is the identity; the rectangular matrix is not asserted invertible.
Conclusion. Steps 1.1-3.1 verify the transition, projection and decomposition statements, including the inverse-chart entry in place of any negative transposed-inverse value, the identity on standard columns and the absence of an off-standard simple ; step 2.2 verifies the block dimensions at contents of the supported tower and the vanishing of higher supported degrees. The two further adjacent-residue degree- blocks of the full algebra are outside this supported window and are treated in the companion showcase; no unprojected monomial is used as a simple class.
Projective and simple dual bases in a degenerate cyclotomic block
Example
Assume inherited AC The Axiom of Choice for the categorification and based-module identifications; the explicit finite calculations below are choice-free.
For and , the degree-one supported block (The degenerate cyclotomic Hecke tower and its residue functors) has simple with and projective cover . Therefore in , whereas . At parameter one the categorification images of The degenerate Ariki categorification theorem and The degenerate cyclotomic Hecke projective is the highest weight module are
The simple image is the PROJECTED vector , not the unprojected . With the normalized highest pairing one has across these three weights. In the degree-two block , the simple is two-dimensional and is itself its projective cover; the abstract Fock weight is one-dimensional, not the underlying module. Thus the composition Cartan values are , while the projective/simple Hom pairing is the identity. Projective covers are self-dual here by the actual symmetric block forms, not merely because their heads are self-dual.
In the costandard basis ,
The divided powers give and , with all other second divided moves . Hence the integral ground-generated lattice is EXACTLY , of index in the full costandard lattice . The standard lattice has basis , is integrally divided-power generated by its ground, and pairs perfectly with the full costandard lattice. Costandard ground cyclicity holds over , not over ; crystal and composition-factor reachability do not imply integral vector generation.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Assume inherited AC The Axiom of Choice for the invoked suppliers. The data , with charge , the degree-one and degree-two supported blocks, and the named categorification identifications of The degenerate cyclotomic Hecke is the dual highest weight module and The degenerate cyclotomic Hecke projective is the highest weight module with the Fock dictionary of The dual-canonical, canonical and quasi-canonical Fock bases. We verify every displayed pairing, self-duality, operator and lattice statement.
The classes of the covers and of the simples are dual bases of under the Cartan Hom pairing, and the identification with the standard and costandard lattices is realized at parameter one by and (The degenerate cyclotomic Hecke projective is the highest weight module).
The Cartan pairing descends to the two Grothendieck groups and pairs the cover and simple bases dually (Projective and simple classes are dual bases under splitting, Projective–module Hom pairing on class generators).
Verification
The degree-one block. For , level and charge the degree-one cyclotomic quotient is by the level-two instance of The degenerate cyclotomic Hecke algebra, and it is already supported, so with . Its radical is and its quotient is , so is local; the unique simple is with , the regular module is its projective cover, and the regular composition series has successive quotients , giving in . Every -linear map is determined by the image of , so .
The symmetric form on and self-duality. The coefficient functional is a symmetrizing trace on : it is linear, for all (both sides pick out the -coefficient of the product), and its radical is zero because , so the associated form has matrix in the basis , which is nonsingular. The anti-involution of The degenerate cyclotomic Hecke algebra that fixes is the identity of here, so the form is generator-fixing, and it exhibits an isomorphism : the dual of the regular module with respect to the trace. This is the actual symmetric-algebra proof of cover self-duality, not an inference from self-duality of the head.
The degree-two block and its simple. With , , the relations give , , , , , and from one gets , so the eight words span the degree-two algebra; the models on with and the swap matrix, and on satisfy all relations, and is central with images ; the Hermite polynomials , map to the separate factor identities. Each factor is generated by its images of , so the homomorphism is onto the eight-dimensional product; the eight-word spanning bound proves that the span of the eight words is isomorphic to with . The supported content cut at keeps the factor ; its simple module has Gram matrix , since and , and it is self-dual and projective, so its projective cover is itself and its endomorphism ring is ; degree contributes , and Hom-spaces between distinct content blocks vanish because they are different blocks. In particular the one-dimensional Fock weight vector is not the two-dimensional module , and the degree-two projective cover has vector-space dimension and composition length . Higher supported degrees vanish directly: in an all-zero-residue module on at least three strands, restriction to strands forces and by the matrix factor. Since commutes with , it commutes with , and the recursion gives . On either eigenspace this is , which is invertible, contradicting nilpotence of at residue zero. Thus such a nonzero module cannot exist; applying this to the regular module proves the supported algebra is zero in every degree at least three.
The projected dual bases at parameter one. In the tensor square at parameter one, , , and reverses these moves with coefficients . Hence the ground constituent has basis as displayed, and its complementary trivial line is . Projection along this line gives and fixes the endpoints. The normalized form is determined by , adjunction and orthogonality of distinct weights: , and . Thus the mixed vector is of -norm , so the correct field dual is , and the endpoint vectors satisfy and . The Gram matrix in the -basis is , and multiplying its first-argument basis by gives the identity matrix, which is the pairing ; this directly computes the parameter-one projected-simple dictionary of The dual-canonical, canonical and quasi-canonical Fock bases and Simples, projectives and tiltings map to the three distinguished Fock bases, not an identification of with the simple.
The categorified residue operators. In these all-zero-residue blocks the residue projectors are the identities, so the bimodules are the explicit tower-inclusion bimodules. Induction from degree to the degree-one block gives the regular module of ; the supported induction from to the degree-two block sends the simple to and the regular module to , which is two copies of the simple ; explicitly has dimension two and is the unique matrix-factor simple, whereas ; restriction of to is the regular Jordan module itself (the generator of acts on as with and ), and restriction of to degree zero is the one-dimensional -module. The right -module is free of rank two: each row is a regular -module for right multiplication by , so these induction functors are exact directly. These explicit bimodules realize the residue functors of The degenerate cyclotomic Hecke tower and its residue functors and yield the displayed columns , , and , , ; equivalently, in the -basis, has columns and has columns , so is in the -normalization of Divided-power commutation and the simple string modules.
The normalized finite identifications. On projective classes the same bimodules give , , and . On simple classes they give step 4.1. Therefore the maps and intertwine both and with the explicit Fock matrices of step 3.1 and send the degree-zero class to the normalized ground. Over each module is ground generated, so these normalized intertwining maps are unique; consequently they agree with any named categorification identification with that normalization, rather than assuming a general bridge to establish this finite instance. Each cover/simple Hom space within a block has dimension one, by step 1.1 and the scalar endomorphism ring in step 2.2, while different degrees give zero Hom in the tower direct sum. Exactness of Hom from a projective makes the pairing additive on short exact sequences, so the pairing matrix is the identity on these bases. Its vector realization is precisely from step 3.1, and the composition Cartan matrix is .
The index-two lattice and its cyclicity. The divided powers and give and , and the displayed matrices preserve evenness of the -coordinate whenever the input has that coordinate even, so the lattice is stable under , their divided powers and the toral operators at weights . It is generated from the ground because and . Its elements have -coordinate even, so it does not contain ; hence it is a proper integral submodule containing the ground, of index in the full costandard lattice, and is not in the integral ground-generated span. Over division by is available, so the ground vector generates the whole three-dimensional costandard space; the standard lattice is by step 5.1 the lattice with basis , which is integrally generated by its ground under the divided powers and pairs perfectly with the full costandard lattice by step 3.1. This proves that integral costandard generation fails while the full integral duality and the standard divided-power statement survive.
Conclusion. Steps 1.1 and 2.1 verify the degree-one cover, its composition length against its Hom dimension, and the symmetric-form self-duality; step 2.2 and step 3.1 verify the degree-two block, the projected dual bases and the pairing identity; step 4.1 verifies the residue operators, their commutator and the categorified ; step 6.1 verifies the exact index-two lattice, its stability, its failure to contain and the rational cyclicity. No step identifies the simple image with the unprojected monomial , and no self-duality is inferred from the head alone.
Charge reversal and the Fock involution in a small example
Example
Assume the Axiom of Choice inherited through the categorification and sign/Young suppliers; the explicit eight-dimensional calculations below use only finite-dimensional linear algebra.
Take , level and charge , so with . Use the semi-infinite columns
corresponding to the partitions . The FULL height- ambient window consists of eight monomials
Their root degrees are ; for ; for ; for ; and for . Here and ; rectification maps , , , and fixes . Multipartition transpose reverses components and transposes their shapes:
This is an ambient monomial permutation, not a permutation of nonexistent Hecke simple or projective labels off .
At parameter one the full algebra window is , and with , the respective degree-two contents being , and . Sign sends , ; it fixes the unique simple and cover, fixes the unique simple and cover, and exchanges the simple/cover pairs in and . On labels it fixes and swaps . Equivalently the simple-label map is , not without rectification, and .
The projected simple vectors are , , , , ; their projective cover vectors are , , , with the endpoints equal to . The ambient transpose at parameter one descends to the highest constituent to fix and to exchange with ; it does NOT swap with the ambient , nor with .
For the full Young namespace of Sign duality and Ringel duality match the Fock-space involutions the block models give
where . Thus cover labels are for the Young family and for the signed family; the off- Young images and off- signed images remain in the ambient family and need not be Hecke projectives. For one has , exactly the charge-reversal/rectification formula. Every displayed Specht is self-dual in these blocks, and ; the two adjacent content blocks are essential to this showcase. In the general asymmetric case the source charge formula remains , and the example does not identify that tower with its original one.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The global sign/transpose proposition Sign duality and Ringel duality match the Fock-space involutions and the categorification dictionary of The degenerate Ariki categorification theorem, with the Fock columns and monomials of The higher-level wedge-tensor Fock module and The dual-canonical, canonical and quasi-canonical Fock bases. We verify the label enumeration, the height-two algebra, the projected vectors, the sign permutation and the full Young/signed tables, under that inherited choice scope.
The Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice) is inherited solely from the local Whittaker, projective/tilting and categorification suppliers used for the projected-vector and full Young dictionary; the block presentations, matrices, finite basis enumeration and explicit sign twists require only finite choice.
For the sign map , gives , intertwines residue with , and satisfies and on reverse-standard labels; the multipartition transpose is the reversed-component shape transpose (Sign duality and Ringel duality match the Fock-space involutions).
The simple and projective labels are indexed by the standard tableaux, with for and zero for the off-standard classes; the four Fock families with the quasi-canonical expansion are the source dictionary used throughout (The degenerate Ariki categorification theorem).
Verification
The eight ambient labels. There is one bipartition of size zero, two of size one and five of size two: ; ; and . The ground-difference column rule at charge gives respectively , so has the vertical partition in the first component and in the second. Subtracting the ground weights gives degree for , for , for , for , and for . Strict columns with weakly increasing rows select ; reverse-standard rows select . Reading the two columns and inserting in this small window gives , , and fixes . Component reversal and partition transpose give precisely the displayed ambient permutation.
The full height-two window. With , , the relations give , , , and ; from one derives , and reducing by this relation decreases the -exponent while killing -exponents at least two, so the eight words span the degree-two algebra. The three models on with and the swap matrix, on , and on satisfy the relations by direct matrix computation; the central element has images , and , and the Hermite polynomials , map to the three separate identities. Each factor is generated by its images of and , so the map is surjective onto the eight-dimensional product and the spanning bound makes it an isomorphism; hence there are no other height-two blocks and are the direct factors listed. The two-dimensional simple of carries the generator-fixed contravariant form , since and ; sign is inner on via conjugation by (which satisfies and ), so the unique simple and its cover are fixed there, while on sign identifies with and exchanges the two factors, fixing the unique objects of those contents as classes.
The projected vectors and the transpose. Normalizing the highest pairing makes the two-term highest sums have norm two, so the dual projected vectors are the half-sums , , , and the projective cover vectors are the unhalved sums with endpoints , . Applying the mixed residue operators and to the mixed highest vector gives and , with kernels and , so at parameter one these kernel vectors have zero projected image and the projected vectors are the displayed half-sums. The ambient monomial transpose at parameter one fixes the ground, commutes with the reflected Chevalley operators (transposing each column negates its contents and the coproduct is cocommutative), and therefore descends to the highest constituent, where it fixes and exchanges with ; it does not swap with the ambient , and the off-standard vectors are zero by [F2]. This is the projected-lattice clause of [F1] on the eight-label window.
The intrinsic Young and signed images. Verify the tables from the intrinsic ideals rather than assuming a projective-preservation theorem. In the reduced permutation ideal of the label is , and of the reverse label it is ; in the reduced permutation ideals are or , where the row factor equals when it occurs; in both labels give the left ideal , the unique simple cover. Every such ideal is indecomposable in its explicit block, so the intrinsic Young definition identifies them exactly: , , , , , , , , with cover labels exactly . The signed reduced permutation ideals of the same labels give , , , , , , , , with cover labels exactly ; no higher summand or nonexistent off-standard simple is needed.
The sign formula on . For , respectively, and . By the tables of step 3.2, ; the sign action of step 2.1 sends these to , respectively. These are both and . For all three classes agree and are fixed by sign. Thus holds for every reverse-standard label in the window. Each displayed Specht is self-dual under the generator-fixed duality in its block: it is one dimensional in , while the matrix-block simple has the explicit form of step 2.1. The transpose exchanges the two adjacent contents, and their one-dimensional generator actions are carried into each other by sign, proving the Specht formula here as well.
Conclusion. Step 1.1 verifies the full eight-label ambient window and the rectification; step 2.1 proves the complete height-two algebra, hence the exact block models and the sign action; step 3.1 verifies the projected simple and cover vectors and the effect of the ambient transpose on the highest constituent, including its failure to swap with ; steps 3.2 and 4.1 verify the full Young and signed tables from the intrinsic ideals and the formula on . The example covers the complete height- sign window; the general asymmetric case keeps the source formula and does not identify the reflected tower with the original one.
The generic Hecke algebra comparison does not extend to every parameter
Statement refuted
Refuted claim: the characteristic-zero generic comparison between the integrally charged degenerate tower and the nondegenerate tower can be specialized to every nonzero Hecke parameter, thereby transporting the degenerate Ariki theorem to every nondegenerate parameter without further comparison results.
Already over , at level one, charge and rank two, the full degenerate algebra is , whereas the nondegenerate algebra at is . They have two and one simple modules, respectively, and are not isomorphic. Thus the claimed universal algebra transport is false. This refutes the proposed method of inference; it does not assert that the nondegenerate Ariki theorem itself is false or cannot be proved using additional results.
The genuine generic comparison and generic categorification equivalence remain in their characteristic-zero, infinite-order, integral-charge scope, as recorded in The degenerate and nondegenerate Ariki theorems have distinct parameter ranges. The full generic based/tower branch remains dependent on the coherent comparison and standard-class dictionary, rather than on unrelated rankwise algebra isomorphisms alone.
Facts & Assumptions
The quadratic Hecke relation in The generic type-A Hecke algebra is . At rank two there is one generator and no braid relation.
The defining relations of The degenerate affine Hecke algebra at rank two are , , and . The level-one quotient of The degenerate cyclotomic Hecke algebra imposes . Only these defining relations, not its tensor-realization proof, are needed below.
In the nondegenerate affine presentation of Affine type-A presentations and charged cyclotomic quotients, are commuting units and , in addition to [F1]. Its monic level-one cyclotomic quotient imposes .
Counterexample
Given: The rank-two presentations of [F1]-[F3] over , level one and integral charge . The nondegenerate cyclotomic root is ; we verify its reduction to the finite Hecke presentation below. We test universal specialization of the generic algebra transport.
Proof technique: direct.
In the degenerate quotient and give . Hence the quotient is generated by with . Conversely the assignments , , in satisfy both cross relations and commutativity, so they define an inverse to the map sending into the quotient. Evaluation at identifies this algebra with , with inverse . In particular it has no nonzero nilpotents and has precisely the two one-dimensional simple modules .
In the nondegenerate level-one quotient [F3], and , so it is generated by . Conversely in the finite algebra of [F1], . The assignments , , therefore give commuting units satisfying and the cyclotomic relation. They define the inverse of the map from into the quotient: both composites fix and their inverses. Hence the whole nondegenerate level-one rank-two quotient is exactly for every and . This uses only the arbitrary-base affine and monic definitions, not a finite- theorem in the generic branch.
At , step 1.2 and [F1] give . Setting identifies it with , whose basis is by division by the monic polynomial . Thus is nonzero and nilpotent. Every with has inverse ; those with are nonunits. Consequently is the unique maximal ideal and is the nonzero radical. Every simple -module is killed by : its image under this central operator is a submodule, and if the image were the whole nonzero simple module, its square could not vanish. The unique simple is therefore .
At rank two the limitation can be seen in an actual comparison formula. For put and . The map respects [F1] because its values at are ; its inverse is , since the quadratic relation implies . At this inverse is undefined and the specialized map sends to , killing the nonzero element . This explicit generic comparison therefore does not specialize to an isomorphism. Other rank-two parameters can yield isomorphisms, including some roots of unity; that does not repair the universal assertion.
The two algebras cannot be isomorphic: an isomorphism would send the nonzero square-zero element of step 2.1 to a nonzero nilpotent in the algebra of step 1.1. Their decomposition behavior also differs directly. The regular module of is the direct sum of its two simples. The regular module has the filtration with both subquotients equal to its unique simple; it is indecomposable since an idempotent satisfies and , forcing it to be or . Thus even projective and simple classes cannot be identified across these two specializations by algebra transport.
Steps 1.1, 2.1 and 3.1 disprove the claimed universal algebra transport and step 2.2 exhibits its failure in a concrete comparison formula. The witness uses the entire rank-two algebras, with the degenerate full integer residue set; it is not a comparison with a supported cut retaining only the charge . For a finite degenerate cut containing this entire example the root interval must contain , since on its two simples. The calculation is choice-free and entirely over . It neither extends characteristic-zero canonical-basis identifications to positive characteristic nor replaces the separate root-of-unity comparison and grading theorems.
Sources
- Brundan-Kleshchev, The degenerate analogue of Ariki's categorification theorem (complete 44-page body, matching native fetch stamp)
- Jonathan Brundan and Alexander Kleshchev, Blocks of cyclotomic Hecke algebras and Khovanov-Lauda algebras, arXiv:0808.2032v4
- Jonathan Brundan and Alexander Kleshchev, The degenerate analogue of Ariki's categorification theorem, arXiv:0901.0057v1