Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

✓ 4 results · all verified · 1 also independently AI-judged
Every result on this page is machine-checked by a proof checker and read in full and owner-audited; the judge is an additional, independent cross-model AI review of the proofs. The 3 not AI-judged were verified by owner audit (typically over a confirmed judge false positive), not failures.

The Degenerate Ariki Categorification Theorem — Examples

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

Objective. This companion page works the degenerate Ariki categorification theorem of the-degenerate-ariki-categorification-theorem on explicit small windows. The decomposition example computes the full transition and projection dictionary on the two-factor Fock space with I={0}, including the inverse chart, the projected simple vector and the height-two block decomposition. The projective/simple example contrasts composition multiplicities with the Cartan Hom pairing in the same block, verifies cover self-duality through the symmetric trace, and exhibits the index-two ground-generated integral lattice inside the full costandard lattice. The charge-reversal example displays the complete height-at-most-two window for I=Z: the eight ambient monomials, the genuine standard and reverse-standard labels, the height-two algebra M2(C)⊕B+⊕B−, the projected half-sums, the sign action and the full tables of Young and signed Young images. The counterexample records why the degenerate theorem may not be transported to nondegenerate Hecke algebras at roots of unity, using the level-one specialization at ξ=−1 against the semisimple degenerate quotient. Every item here is a dependency leaf: it consumes the parent page and its established prerequisites, and nothing outside this pair depends on anything homed here. No equality of a supported cut with the whole cyclotomic algebra, and no unprojected monomial used as a simple class, appears anywhere on this page.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

None yet.

5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passOpen item page →

Degenerate Ariki decomposition numbers in small rank

Example

Assume inherited AC The Axiom of Choice for the categorification and based-module identifications; the explicit finite calculations below are choice-free.

Take I={0}, so I+={0,1}, level l=2 and Λ=2Λ0 with charge (0,0). Here the tower means the I-SUPPORTED central cut, not the full degree-d cyclotomic algebra. The Fock space is V⊗V with monomials 00,01,10,11 (The higher-level wedge-tensor Fock module), and Std={00,01,11}, Rev={00,10,11} with source Bruhat order 01<10. Write MA for the monomial, π for the normalized highest projection and DA=πLA as in The dual-canonical, canonical and quasi-canonical Fock bases. In the source parameter s (the library parameter is t=s−1),

L00=M00,L01=M01,L10=M10−sM01,L11=M11,

and M10=L10+sL01, so the FULL ambient d-matrix is the inverse of the L-in-M matrix, with diagonal 1 and d01,10=s; it is not its transpose. Moreover T10=M10+s−1M01 and P01=M01+sM10=sT10. The actual projection is D01=T10/(s+s−1), πM10=sD01, πL10=0, and D00=M00, D11=M11; in particular at parameter one D01=(M01+M10)/2, not the unprojected L01=M01.

The decomposition matrix at parameter one has rows 00,01,11 and columns 00,01,10,11:

(100001100001).

Thus S00=D00, S01≅S10≅D01 and S11≅D11: the nonstandard Specht label 10 has a nonzero decomposition entry, but there is no simple D10. If SB denotes πMB, it is defined for all four columns, but only SStd is a basis, and the displayed 3×4 matrix is not an invertible unitriangular square matrix. The supported blocks are C, C[x]/x2 and M2(C) at 0,α0,2α0 respectively, with simple dimensions 1,1,2; these are all simples of this finite-I tower and higher supported degrees vanish. The whole degree-2 algebra has two additional adjacent-residue blocks, retained in the I=Z companion showcase. All displayed Specht decomposition entries are 0 or 1 (the relevant Weyl group is S2).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Assume inherited AC The Axiom of Choice for the invoked suppliers. The data I={0}, Λ=2Λ0, charge (0,0), the Fock monomial and projection dictionary of The dual-canonical, canonical and quasi-canonical Fock bases and Standard tableau monomials form a basis of the highest weight Fock submodule, and the decomposition dictionary at parameter one of Degenerate Specht decomposition numbers are canonical basis coefficients at one. We verify the displayed transition, projection, decomposition and block statements.

[F1]

At parameter one, for every Specht label B and every simple label A one has [S(B):D(A)]=dA,B(1), where dA,B(s) is defined by MB=∑AdA,B(s)LA, and the matrix D(s)=(dA,B) is the inverse of the L-in-M chart, not its transpose (Degenerate Specht decomposition numbers are canonical basis coefficients at one).

[F2]

The simple classes of the supported tower are indexed by StdΛ and the Specht classes satisfy [S(B)]↦SB, the identification being exact and compatible with the residue functors (The degenerate Ariki categorification theorem).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1givenalgebra

The four monomials and the label sets. The finite alphabet is I+={0,1} and each charge-zero factor is its one-box natural module. Hence its tensor-square basis is M00,M01,M10,M11. Weakly increasing rows select 00,01,11, and weakly decreasing rows select 00,10,11, so these are respectively Std and Rev; the mixed Bruhat order is 01<10. The actual coordinate weights are 2δ0,δ0+δ1,δ0+δ1,2δ1; subtracting each from the vacuum weight 2δ0 gives contents 0,α0,α0,2α0. In particular Iα0={(0)} and I2α0={(0,0)}: residue sequences have length equal to tower degree, independently of the two tensor factors.

1.2givenalgebra

The transition vectors and the reciprocal convention. On this mixed space the ordinary Fock bar is ψM01=M01 and ψM10=M10+(s−1−s)M01, with coefficient bar s↦s−1. Direct substitution shows that L10=M10−sM01 and T10=M10+s−1M01 are bar fixed in their respective positive- and negative-power triangular charts; the endpoints and L01 equal their monomials. Thus M10=L10+sL01, and the ambient inverse-chart coefficient is d01,10=s. Its row gives P01=M01+sM10=sT10. Under t=s−1 these same formulas become L10=M10−t−1M01, T10=M10+tM01 and P01=M01+t−1M10; reciprocating the parameter does not transpose the inverse transition matrix.

2.1givenstep 1.2algebra

The normalized projection. The source coproduct gives F0M00=M10+s−1M01=T10 and F0T10=(s+s−1)M11. Hence T10 lies in the ground-generated constituent and is fixed by its normalized projection. The ground highest vector is M00; E0M01=M00, so M01 is not highest. The same coproduct gives E0M10=sM00, F0M01=M11 and F0M10=sM11, so both E0 and F0 kill L10. Its weight is zero for h0, hence it spans a trivial constituent, complementary to the three-dimensional ground constituent since T10 and L10 are linearly independent. Projection onto the ground constituent along this line is a module map fixing the ground, so this directly constructs the normalized projection and its off-standard kernel Q(s)L10. Since T10−L10=(s+s−1)M01, applying the projection gives D01=πM01=T10/(s+s−1) and πM10=sD01. The endpoints are fixed, and πL10=0. At s=1 this is the half-sum (M01+M10)/2. All divisions here take place over Q(s); they do not identify the projected costandard lattice with the ambient integral monomial lattice.

2.2step 1.1givenalgebra

The supported blocks. Set x=x1, y=x2, u=s1. The defining relations of The degenerate cyclotomic Hecke algebra give u2=1, [x,y]=0, ux=yu−1, uy=xu+1 and x2=0 in the relevant degree; from ux2=0 and the cross relations one obtains y2u=x+y, hence y2=(x+y)u, and reducing the relation y2=(x+y)u decreases the y-exponent while killing x-exponents at least 2, so the eight words 1,x,y,xy,u,xu,yu,xyu span the degree-2 algebra. Map these generators to (N,−N,−J) on M2(C) with N=E12 and J the swap matrix, to (ϵ,1+ϵ,1) on B+=C[ϵ]/ϵ2, and to (ϵ,−1+ϵ,−1) on B−=C[ϵ]/ϵ2; direct matrix computation verifies u2=1, [x,y]=0, x2=0, ux=yu−1 and uy=xu+1 in all three factors. The central element z=x+y has images 0, 1+2ϵ and −1+2ϵ, and the Hermite polynomials E0=(1−z2)2, E±=(1−E0±(3z−z3)/2)/2 map to the three separate identities; each factor is generated by its images of x and u, so the map from the span of the eight words onto the eight-dimensional product is surjective and hence, by the spanning bound, an isomorphism. The I={0} spectral content cut keeps the factor M2(C) at content 2α0 and discards the adjacent-content factors, so the supported degree-2 block is M2(C) with simple dimension 2; degree one is C[x]/x2 with simple dimension 1 at content α0, and degree zero is C. To verify vanishing independently of categorification, suppose an all-zero-residue supported module exists in degree at least three. Its restriction to the first two strands lies in the displayed M2 factor, hence x2=−x1 and x12=0. Since s2 commutes with x1, it also commutes with x2. The affine recursion gives x3=s2x2s2+s2=x2+s2. But a commuting sum of a square-zero operator and an involution has generalized eigenvalues only 1,−1: on the two s2 eigenspaces it is ±1+x2, each invertible with inverse ±1−x2. This contradicts the nilpotence required by residue zero for x3. Every nonzero finite-dimensional algebra has its nonzero regular module, so no such supported algebra exists in degree three or higher.

3.1F2step 1.2step 2.1step 2.2givenalgebra

The decomposition matrix by intrinsic modules. The intrinsic affine-induced Specht presentation in Schur functor images of standard, simple, projective and tilting objects gives, for either single-box label 01 or 10, the degree-one module H1/H1x=C; the two different singleton components have the same charge zero. For 11, with one box in each component, it gives H2/(H2x+H2y), since the inducing algebra is the polynomial algebra on the two strand variables and both act as zero on its one-dimensional inducing module. In the three factors of step 2.2, x,y generate the whole left ideal in B+ and B− because y−x=±1; in the matrix factor y=−x=−N, so the quotient is M2/M2N. Here M2N consists of matrices with first column zero, and the first-column map identifies the quotient with the defining simple C2. The degree-zero Specht is C. Thus each of these four Spechts is the indicated simple, directly giving the displayed 3×4 multiplicity matrix. Independently step 1.2 gives d01,10(1)=1 and identity on standard columns, so these actual multiplicities agree with [F1]. There is one simple in each of the three supported blocks by step 2.2, so there is no additional simple D10. The standard square submatrix is the identity; the rectangular matrix is not asserted invertible.

4.1step 3.1step 2.2given∎

Conclusion. Steps 1.1-3.1 verify the transition, projection and decomposition statements, including the inverse-chart entry d01,10(1)=1 in place of any negative transposed-inverse value, the identity on standard columns and the absence of an off-standard simple D10; step 2.2 verifies the block dimensions 1,1,2 at contents 0,α0,2α0 of the supported tower and the vanishing of higher supported degrees. The two further adjacent-residue degree-2 blocks of the full algebra are outside this supported window and are treated in the companion showcase; no unprojected monomial is used as a simple class.

ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passOpen item page →

Projective and simple dual bases in a degenerate cyclotomic block

Example

Assume inherited AC The Axiom of Choice for the categorification and based-module identifications; the explicit finite calculations below are choice-free.

For I={0} and Λ=2Λ0, the degree-one supported block B=C[x]/x2 (The degenerate cyclotomic Hecke tower and its residue functors) has simple D01=C with x↦0 and projective cover Y01=B. Therefore [Y01]=2[D01] in G0, whereas dim⁡Hom⁡(Y01,D01)=1. At parameter one the categorification images of The degenerate Ariki categorification theorem and The degenerate cyclotomic Hecke projective K0 is the highest weight module are

P00=D00=M00,P01=M01+M10,D01=12(M01+M10),P11=D11=M11.

The simple image is the PROJECTED vector πL01, not the unprojected L01=M01. With the normalized highest pairing C0 one has C0(PA,DB)=δAB across these three weights. In the degree-two block M2(C), the simple D11 is two-dimensional and is itself its projective cover; the abstract Fock weight is one-dimensional, not the underlying module. Thus the composition Cartan values are 1,2,1, while the projective/simple Hom pairing is the identity. Projective covers are self-dual here by the actual symmetric block forms, not merely because their heads are self-dual.

In the costandard basis (D00,D01,D11),

fD00=2D01,fD01=D11,fD11=0;eD00=0,eD01=D00,eD11=2D01.

The divided powers give f(2)D00=D11 and e(2)D11=D00, with all other second divided moves 0. Hence the integral ground-generated lattice is EXACTLY ZD00⊕2ZD01⊕ZD11, of index 2 in the full costandard lattice ZD00⊕ZD01⊕ZD11. The standard lattice has basis (P00,P01,P11), is integrally divided-power generated by its ground, and pairs perfectly with the full costandard lattice. Costandard ground cyclicity holds over Q, not over Z; crystal and composition-factor reachability do not imply integral vector generation.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Assume inherited AC The Axiom of Choice for the invoked suppliers. The data I={0}, Λ=2Λ0 with charge (0,0), the degree-one and degree-two supported blocks, and the named categorification identifications of The degenerate cyclotomic Hecke G0 is the dual highest weight module and The degenerate cyclotomic Hecke projective K0 is the highest weight module with the Fock dictionary of The dual-canonical, canonical and quasi-canonical Fock bases. We verify every displayed pairing, self-duality, operator and lattice statement.

[F1]

The classes of the covers Y(A) and of the simples D(A) are dual bases of K0(Proj)×G0(Rep) under the Cartan Hom pairing, and the identification with the standard and costandard lattices is realized at parameter one by [Y(A)]↦PA and [D(A)]↦DA=πLA (The degenerate cyclotomic Hecke projective K0 is the highest weight module).

[F2]

The Cartan pairing descends to the two Grothendieck groups and pairs the cover and simple bases dually (Projective and simple classes are dual bases under splitting, Projective–module Hom pairing on class generators).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1givenalgebra

The degree-one block. For I={0}, level 2 and charge (0,0) the degree-one cyclotomic quotient is H1(0,0)=C[x1]/(x12) by the level-two instance of The degenerate cyclotomic Hecke algebra, and it is already supported, so B=C[x]/x2 with x=x1. Its radical is (x) and its quotient is C, so B is local; the unique simple is D01=C with x↦0, the regular module Y01=B is its projective cover, and the regular composition series 0⊂(x)⊂B has successive quotients D01,D01, giving [Y01]=2[D01] in G0. Every B-linear map B→D01 is determined by the image of 1, so dim⁡Hom⁡(Y01,D01)=1.

2.1step 1.1givenalgebra

The symmetric form on B and self-duality. The coefficient functional τ(a+bx)=b is a symmetrizing trace on B: it is linear, τ(uv)=τ(vu) for all u,v (both sides pick out the x-coefficient of the product), and its radical is zero because τ(x)≠0, so the associated form ⟨u,v⟩=τ(uv) has matrix (0110) in the basis (1,x), which is nonsingular. The anti-involution ∗ of The degenerate cyclotomic Hecke algebra that fixes x is the identity of B here, so the form is generator-fixing, and it exhibits an isomorphism Y01≅Y01⊛: the dual of the regular module with respect to the trace. This is the actual symmetric-algebra proof of cover self-duality, not an inference from self-duality of the head.

2.2step 1.1givenalgebra

The degree-two block and its simple. With x=x1, y=x2, u=s1 the relations give u2=1, [x,y]=0, ux=yu−1, uy=xu+1, x2=0, and from ux2=0 one gets y2=(x+y)u, so the eight words 1,x,y,xy,u,xu,yu,xyu span the degree-two algebra; the models (N,−N,−J) on M2(C) with N=E12 and J the swap matrix, (ϵ,1+ϵ,1) and (ϵ,−1+ϵ,−1) on C[ϵ]/ϵ2 satisfy all relations, and z=x+y is central with images 0,1+2ϵ,−1+2ϵ; the Hermite polynomials E0=(1−z2)2, E±=(1−E0±(3z−z3)/2)/2 map to the separate factor identities. Each factor is generated by its images of x,u, so the homomorphism is onto the eight-dimensional product; the eight-word spanning bound proves that the span of the eight words is isomorphic to M2(C)⊕B+⊕B− with B±=C[ϵ]/ϵ2. The supported content cut at 2α0 keeps the factor M2(C); its simple module C2 has Gram matrix J, since NtJ=JN and (−J)tJ=J(−J), and it is self-dual and projective, so its projective cover is itself and its endomorphism ring is C; degree 0 contributes C, and Hom-spaces between distinct content blocks vanish because they are different blocks. In particular the one-dimensional Fock weight vector M11 is not the two-dimensional module D11, and the degree-two projective cover has vector-space dimension 2 and composition length 1. Higher supported degrees vanish directly: in an all-zero-residue module on at least three strands, restriction to strands 1,2 forces x2=−x1 and x12=0 by the matrix factor. Since s2 commutes with x1, it commutes with x2, and the recursion gives x3=x2+s2. On either s2 eigenspace this is x2±1, which is invertible, contradicting nilpotence of x3 at residue zero. Thus such a nonzero module cannot exist; applying this to the regular module proves the supported algebra is zero in every degree at least three.

3.1step 2.2givenalgebra

The projected dual bases at parameter one. In the tensor square at parameter one, fM00=M01+M10, f(M01+M10)=2M11, and e reverses these moves with coefficients 2,1. Hence the ground constituent has basis P00,P01,P11 as displayed, and its complementary trivial line is M10−M01. Projection along this line gives D01=πM01=12(M01+M10) and fixes the endpoints. The normalized form is determined by C0(M00,M00)=1, e/f adjunction and orthogonality of distinct weights: C0(P01,P01)=C0(M00,eP01)=2, and 2C0(P11,P11)=C0(P01,eP11)=2. Thus the mixed vector is P01=M01+M10 of C0-norm 2, so the correct field dual is D01=12(M01+M10), and the endpoint vectors satisfy P00=D00=M00 and P11=D11=M11. The Gram matrix in the D-basis is diag⁡(1,12,1), and multiplying its first-argument basis by diag⁡(1,2,1) gives the identity matrix, which is the pairing C0(PA,DB)=δAB; this directly computes the parameter-one projected-simple dictionary of The dual-canonical, canonical and quasi-canonical Fock bases and Simples, projectives and tiltings map to the three distinguished Fock bases, not an identification of L01=M01 with the simple.

4.1step 2.2step 3.1givenalgebra

The categorified residue operators. In these all-zero-residue blocks the residue projectors are the identities, so the bimodules are the explicit tower-inclusion bimodules. Induction from degree 0 to the degree-one block gives the regular module of B; the supported induction from B to the degree-two block M2(C) sends the simple C to C2 and the regular module B to M2(C), which is two copies of the simple C2; explicitly M2⊗BC=M2/M2N has dimension two and is the unique matrix-factor simple, whereas M2⊗BB=M2; restriction of C2 to B is the regular Jordan module B itself (the generator x of B acts on C2 as N with N2=0 and dim⁡ker⁡N=1), and restriction of D01=C to degree zero is the one-dimensional C-module. The right B-module M2 is free of rank two: each row is a regular B-module for right multiplication by N, so these induction functors are exact directly. These explicit bimodules realize the residue functors of The degenerate cyclotomic Hecke tower and its residue functors and yield the displayed columns fD00=2D01, fD01=D11, fD11=0 and eD00=0, eD01=D00, eD11=2D01; equivalently, in the D-basis, f has columns (0,2,0)T,(0,0,1)T,0 and e has columns 0,(1,0,0)T,(0,2,0)T, so [e,f]=ef−fe is diag⁡(2,0,−2) in the sl2-normalization of Divided-power commutation and the simple Uqi(sl2) string modules.

5.1F1F2step 1.1step 2.2step 3.1step 4.1givenalgebra

The normalized finite identifications. On projective classes the same bimodules give f[Y00]=[Y01], f[Y01]=2[Y11], e[Y01]=2[Y00] and e[Y11]=[Y01]. On simple classes they give step 4.1. Therefore the maps [YA]↦PA and [DA]↦DA intertwine both e and f with the explicit Fock matrices of step 3.1 and send the degree-zero class to the normalized ground. Over Q each module is ground generated, so these normalized intertwining maps are unique; consequently they agree with any named categorification identification with that normalization, rather than assuming a general bridge to establish this finite instance. Each cover/simple Hom space within a block has dimension one, by step 1.1 and the scalar endomorphism ring in step 2.2, while different degrees give zero Hom in the tower direct sum. Exactness of Hom from a projective makes the pairing additive on short exact sequences, so the pairing matrix is the identity on these bases. Its vector realization is precisely C0(PA,DB)=δAB from step 3.1, and the composition Cartan matrix is diag⁡(1,2,1).

6.1step 3.1step 4.1step 5.1givenalgebra

The index-two lattice and its cyclicity. The divided powers f(2)=f2/2 and e(2)=e2/2 give f(2)D00=D11 and e(2)D11=D00, and the displayed matrices preserve evenness of the D01-coordinate whenever the input has that coordinate even, so the lattice LZ=ZD00⊕2ZD01⊕ZD11 is stable under e,f, their divided powers and the toral operators at weights 2,0,−2. It is generated from the ground because fD00=2D01 and f(2)D00=D11. Its elements have D01-coordinate even, so it does not contain D01; hence it is a proper integral submodule containing the ground, of index 2 in the full costandard lattice, and D01 is not in the integral ground-generated span. Over Q division by 2 is available, so the ground vector generates the whole three-dimensional costandard space; the standard lattice is by step 5.1 the lattice with basis (P00,P01,P11), which is integrally generated by its ground under the divided powers and pairs perfectly with the full costandard lattice by step 3.1. This proves that integral costandard generation fails while the full integral duality and the standard divided-power statement survive.

7.1step 2.1step 3.1step 4.1step 6.1given∎

Conclusion. Steps 1.1 and 2.1 verify the degree-one cover, its composition length against its Hom dimension, and the symmetric-form self-duality; step 2.2 and step 3.1 verify the degree-two block, the projected dual bases and the pairing identity; step 4.1 verifies the residue operators, their commutator and the categorified [Y01]=2[D01]; step 6.1 verifies the exact index-two lattice, its stability, its failure to contain D01 and the rational cyclicity. No step identifies the simple image with the unprojected monomial L01, and no self-duality is inferred from the head alone.

ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

Charge reversal and the Fock involution in a small example

Example

Assume the Axiom of Choice inherited through the categorification and sign/Young suppliers; the explicit eight-dimensional calculations below use only finite-dimensional linear algebra.

Take I=Z, level l=2 and charge (0,0), so Λ=2Λ0 with Λt=Λ. Use the semi-infinite columns

O=(0,−1,−2,… ),U=(1,−1,−2,… ),R=(2,−1,−2,… ),C=(1,0,−2,−3,… ),

corresponding to the partitions ∅,1,2,11. The FULL height-≤2 ambient window consists of eight monomials

00=OO;01=OU;10=UO;11=UU;0R=OR;R0=RO;0C=OC;C0=CO.

Their root degrees are 0; α0 for 01,10; 2α0 for 11; α0+α1 for 0R,R0; and α0+α−1 for 0C,C0. Here Std={00,01,11,0R,0C} and Rev={00,10,11,R0,C0}; rectification maps 10↦01, R0↦0R, C0↦0C, and fixes 00,11. Multipartition transpose reverses components and transposes their shapes:

01↔10,0R↔C0,R0↔0C;00,11 fixed.

This is an ambient monomial permutation, not a permutation of nonexistent Hecke simple or projective labels off Std.

At parameter one the full algebra window is H0=C, H1=C[x]/x2 and H2=M2(C)⊕B+⊕B− with B±=C[ϵ]/ϵ2, the respective degree-two contents being 2α0, α0+α1 and α0+α−1. Sign sends xr↦−xr, sr↦−sr; it fixes the unique α0 simple and cover, fixes the unique 2α0 simple and cover, and exchanges the simple/cover pairs in B+ and B−. On Std labels it fixes 00,01,11 and swaps 0R↔0C. Equivalently the simple-label map is B↦(B↑)t, not B↦Bt without rectification, and D10=DR0=DC0=0.

The projected simple vectors are D01=12(M01+M10), D0R=12(M0R+MR0), D0C=12(M0C+MC0), D00=M00, D11=M11; their projective cover vectors are P01=M01+M10, P0R=M0R+MR0, P0C=M0C+MC0, with the endpoints equal to D. The ambient transpose at parameter one descends to the highest constituent to fix P01/D01 and to exchange P0R/D0R with P0C/D0C; it does NOT swap P01 with the ambient P10, nor D01 with D10.

For the full Young namespace of Sign duality and Ringel duality match the Fock-space involutions the block models give

Y00=C, Y01=B0, Y10=D01, Y11=D11, Y0R=B+, YR0=D0R, Y0C=B−, YC0=D0C,

Y~00=C, Y~01=D01, Y~10=B0, Y~11=D11, Y~0R=D0R, Y~R0=B+, Y~0C=D0C, Y~C0=B−,

where B0=C[x]/x2. Thus cover labels are Std for the Young family and Rev for the signed family; the off-Std Young images and off-Rev signed images remain in the ambient family and need not be Hecke projectives. For A∈Rev one has Y~(A)=σ∗Y(At)≅Y(A↓), exactly the charge-reversal/rectification formula. Every displayed Specht is self-dual in these blocks, and σ∗S(At)≅S(A)⊛; the two adjacent content blocks are essential to this showcase. In the general asymmetric case the source charge formula remains Λt=Λ−ml+⋯+Λ−m1, and the example does not identify that tower with its original one.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The global sign/transpose proposition Sign duality and Ringel duality match the Fock-space involutions and the categorification dictionary of The degenerate Ariki categorification theorem, with the Fock columns and monomials of The higher-level wedge-tensor Fock module and The dual-canonical, canonical and quasi-canonical Fock bases. We verify the label enumeration, the height-two algebra, the projected vectors, the sign permutation and the full Young/signed tables, under that inherited choice scope.

[A1]

The Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice) is inherited solely from the local Whittaker, projective/tilting and categorification suppliers used for the projected-vector and full Young dictionary; the block presentations, matrices, finite basis enumeration and explicit sign twists require only finite choice.

[F1]

For I=Z the sign map σ(sr)=−sr, σ(xr)=−xr gives HαΛ≅HαtΛt, intertwines residue i with −i, and satisfies σ∗S(At)≅S(A)⊛ and σ∗D(At)≅D(A↓) on reverse-standard labels; the multipartition transpose is the reversed-component shape transpose (Sign duality and Ringel duality match the Fock-space involutions).

[F2]

The simple and projective labels are indexed by the standard tableaux, with DA=πLA for A∈StdΛ and zero for the off-standard classes; the four Fock families MA,LA,TA,PA with the quasi-canonical expansion PA=∑BdA,B(s)MB are the source dictionary used throughout (The degenerate Ariki categorification theorem).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1givenalgebra

The eight ambient labels. There is one bipartition of size zero, two of size one and five of size two: (∅,∅); (∅,1),(1,∅); and (1,1),(∅,2),(2,∅),(∅,11),(11,∅). The ground-difference column rule at charge (0,0) gives respectively OO,OU,UO,UU,OR,RO,OC,CO, so C0 has the vertical partition in the first component and 0C in the second. Subtracting the ground weights gives degree 0 for 00, α0 for 01,10, 2α0 for 11, α0+α1 for 0R,R0, and α0+α−1 for 0C,C0. Strict columns with weakly increasing rows select 00,01,11,0R,0C; reverse-standard rows select 00,10,11,R0,C0. Reading the two columns and inserting in this small window gives 10↓=01, R0↓=0R, C0↓=0C and fixes 00,11. Component reversal and partition transpose give precisely the displayed ambient permutation.

2.1step 1.1givenalgebra

The full height-two window. With x=x1, y=x2, u=s1 the relations give u2=1, [x,y]=0, ux=yu−1, uy=xu+1 and x2=0; from ux2=0 one derives y2=(x+y)u, and reducing by this relation decreases the y-exponent while killing x-exponents at least two, so the eight words 1,x,y,xy,u,xu,yu,xyu span the degree-two algebra. The three models (N,−N,−J) on M2(C) with N=E12 and J the swap matrix, (ϵ,1+ϵ,1) on B+, and (ϵ,−1+ϵ,−1) on B− satisfy the relations by direct matrix computation; the central element z=x+y has images 0, 1+2ϵ and −1+2ϵ, and the Hermite polynomials E0=(1−z2)2, E±=(1−E0±(3z−z3)/2)/2 map to the three separate identities. Each factor is generated by its images of x and u, so the map is surjective onto the eight-dimensional product and the spanning bound makes it an isomorphism; hence there are no other height-two blocks and H0,H1 are the direct factors listed. The two-dimensional simple of M2(C) carries the generator-fixed contravariant form J, since NtJ=JN and (−J)tJ=J(−J); sign is inner on M2(C) via conjugation by K=diag⁡(1,−1) (which satisfies KN=−NK and KJ=−JK), so the unique simple and its cover are fixed there, while on B± sign identifies ϵ with −ϵ and exchanges the two factors, fixing the unique objects of those contents as classes.

3.1A1step 1.1step 2.1F1F2givenalgebra

The projected vectors and the transpose. Normalizing the highest pairing C0 makes the two-term highest sums have norm two, so the dual projected vectors are the half-sums D01=12(M01+M10), D0R=12(M0R+MR0), D0C=12(M0C+MC0), and the projective cover vectors are the unhalved sums with endpoints P00=D00, P11=D11. Applying the mixed residue operators f1 and f−1 to the mixed highest vector gives TR0=MR0+s−1M0R and TC0=MC0+s−1M0C, with kernels LR0=MR0−sM0R and LC0=MC0−sM0C, so at parameter one these kernel vectors have zero projected image and the projected vectors are the displayed half-sums. The ambient monomial transpose at parameter one fixes the ground, commutes with the reflected Chevalley operators (transposing each column negates its contents and the coproduct is cocommutative), and therefore descends to the highest constituent, where it fixes P01/D01 and exchanges P0R/D0R with P0C/D0C; it does not swap P01 with the ambient P10, and the off-standard vectors D10,DR0,DC0 are zero by [F2]. This is the projected-lattice clause of [F1] on the eight-label window.

3.2step 2.1F1givenalgebra

The intrinsic Young and signed images. Verify the tables from the intrinsic ideals rather than assuming a projective-preservation theorem. In B0=C[x]/x2 the reduced permutation ideal of the label 01 is B0, and of the reverse label 10 it is (x); in B± the reduced permutation ideals are B± or (xy)=(±ϵ), where the row factor 1±u equals 2 when it occurs; in M2(C) both labels 11 give the left ideal M2N, the unique simple cover. Every such ideal is indecomposable in its explicit block, so the intrinsic Young definition identifies them exactly: Y00=C, Y01=B0, Y10=D01, Y11=D11, Y0R=B+, YR0=D0R, Y0C=B−, YC0=D0C, with cover labels exactly Std. The signed reduced permutation ideals of the same labels give Y~00=C, Y~01=D01, Y~10=B0, Y~11=D11, Y~0R=D0R, Y~R0=B+, Y~0C=D0C, Y~C0=B−, with cover labels exactly Rev; no higher summand or nonexistent off-standard simple is needed.

4.1step 2.1step 3.2F1algebra

The sign formula on Rev. For A=10,R0,C0, respectively, At=01,0C,0R and A↓=01,0R,0C. By the tables of step 3.2, Y(At)=B0,B−,B+; the sign action of step 2.1 sends these to B0,B+,B−, respectively. These are both Y~(A) and Y(A↓). For A=00,11 all three classes agree and are fixed by sign. Thus Y~(A)=σ∗Y(At)≅Y(A↓) holds for every reverse-standard label in the window. Each displayed Specht is self-dual under the generator-fixed duality in its block: it is one dimensional in B0,B±, while the matrix-block simple has the explicit form J of step 2.1. The transpose exchanges the two adjacent contents, and their one-dimensional generator actions are carried into each other by sign, proving the Specht formula here as well.

5.1step 3.1step 4.1given∎

Conclusion. Step 1.1 verifies the full eight-label ambient window and the rectification; step 2.1 proves the complete height-two algebra, hence the exact block models and the sign action; step 3.1 verifies the projected simple and cover vectors and the effect of the ambient transpose on the highest constituent, including its failure to swap P01 with P10; steps 3.2 and 4.1 verify the full Young and signed tables from the intrinsic ideals and the formula Y~(A)=σ∗Y(At)≅Y(A↓) on Rev. The example covers the complete height-≤2 sign window; the general asymmetric case keeps the source formula Λt=Λ−ml+⋯+Λ−m1 and does not identify the reflected tower with the original one.

CounterexampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passOpen item page →

The generic Hecke algebra comparison does not extend to every parameter

Statement refuted

Refuted claim: the characteristic-zero generic comparison between the integrally charged degenerate tower and the nondegenerate tower can be specialized to every nonzero Hecke parameter, thereby transporting the degenerate Ariki theorem to every nondegenerate parameter without further comparison results.

Already over C, at level one, charge m∈Z and rank two, the full degenerate algebra is C[S2], whereas the nondegenerate algebra at ξ=−1 is C[ε]/(ε2). They have two and one simple modules, respectively, and are not isomorphic. Thus the claimed universal algebra transport is false. This refutes the proposed method of inference; it does not assert that the nondegenerate Ariki theorem itself is false or cannot be proved using additional results.

The genuine generic comparison and generic categorification equivalence remain in their characteristic-zero, infinite-order, integral-charge scope, as recorded in The degenerate and nondegenerate Ariki theorems have distinct parameter ranges. The full generic based/tower branch remains dependent on the coherent comparison and standard-class dictionary, rather than on unrelated rankwise algebra isomorphisms alone.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

The quadratic Hecke relation in The generic type-A Hecke algebra is (Tr−ξ)(Tr+1)=0. At rank two there is one generator and no braid relation.

[F2]

The defining relations of The degenerate affine Hecke algebra at rank two are s2=1, x1x2=x2x1, sx2=x1s+1 and x2s=sx1+1. The level-one quotient of The degenerate cyclotomic Hecke algebra imposes x1=m. Only these defining relations, not its tensor-realization proof, are needed below.

[F3]

In the nondegenerate affine presentation of Affine type-A presentations and charged cyclotomic quotients, X1,X2 are commuting units and TX1T=ξX2, in addition to [F1]. Its monic level-one cyclotomic quotient imposes X1=Q.

Counterexample

Given: The rank-two presentations of [F1]-[F3] over C, level one and integral charge m. The nondegenerate cyclotomic root is Q=ξm; we verify its reduction to the finite Hecke presentation below. We test universal specialization of the generic algebra transport.

Proof technique: direct.

1.1F2algebraconstruct

In the degenerate quotient x1=m and sx2=ms+1 give x2=m+s. Hence the quotient is generated by s with s2=1. Conversely the assignments x1↦m, x2↦m+s, s↦s in C[s]/(s2−1) satisfy both cross relations and commutativity, so they define an inverse to the map sending s into the quotient. Evaluation at s=1,−1 identifies this algebra with C⊕C, with inverse (a,b)↦(a+b)/2+(a−b)s/2. In particular it has no nonzero nilpotents and has precisely the two one-dimensional simple modules s=1,−1.

1.2F1F3algebraconstruct

In the nondegenerate level-one quotient [F3], X1=Q and X2=Qξ−1T2, so it is generated by T. Conversely in the finite algebra Hξ(2) of [F1], T−1=ξ−1(T−(ξ−1)). The assignments X1↦Q, X2↦Qξ−1T2, T↦T therefore give commuting units satisfying TX1T=ξX2 and the cyclotomic relation. They define the inverse of the map from Hξ(2) into the quotient: both composites fix T,X1,X2 and their inverses. Hence the whole nondegenerate level-one rank-two quotient is exactly Hξ(2) for every ξ≠0 and Q=ξm. This uses only the arbitrary-base affine and monic definitions, not a finite-e theorem in the generic branch.

2.1F1step 1.2algebra

At ξ=−1, step 1.2 and [F1] give H−1(2)=C[T]/((T+1)2). Setting ε=T+1 identifies it with B=C[ε]/(ε2), whose basis is 1,ε by division by the monic polynomial ε2. Thus ε is nonzero and nilpotent. Every a+bε with a≠0 has inverse a−1−ba−2ε; those with a=0 are nonunits. Consequently (ε) is the unique maximal ideal and is the nonzero radical. Every simple B-module is killed by ε: its image under this central operator is a submodule, and if the image were the whole nonzero simple module, its square could not vanish. The unique simple is therefore B/(ε)≅C.

2.2F1step 1.1algebraconstruct

At rank two the limitation can be seen in an actual comparison formula. For ξ≠−1 put a=(ξ−1)/2 and b=(ξ+1)/2. The map T↦a+bs respects [F1] because its values at s=1,−1 are ξ,−1; its inverse is s↦(T−a)/b, since the quadratic relation implies (T−a)2=b2. At ξ=−1 this inverse is undefined and the specialized map sends T to −1, killing the nonzero element T+1. This explicit generic comparison therefore does not specialize to an isomorphism. Other rank-two parameters can yield isomorphisms, including some roots of unity; that does not repair the universal assertion.

3.1step 1.1step 2.1algebra

The two algebras cannot be isomorphic: an isomorphism would send the nonzero square-zero element of step 2.1 to a nonzero nilpotent in the algebra of step 1.1. Their decomposition behavior also differs directly. The regular module of C⊕C is the direct sum of its two simples. The regular module B has the filtration 0⊂(ε)⊂B with both subquotients equal to its unique simple; it is indecomposable since an idempotent a+bε satisfies a2=a and 2ab=b, forcing it to be 0 or 1. Thus even projective and simple classes cannot be identified across these two specializations by algebra transport.

4.1step 1.1step 1.2step 2.1step 3.1step 2.2algebragiven∎

Steps 1.1, 2.1 and 3.1 disprove the claimed universal algebra transport and step 2.2 exhibits its failure in a concrete comparison formula. The witness uses the entire rank-two algebras, with the degenerate full integer residue set; it is not a comparison with a supported cut retaining only the charge m. For a finite degenerate cut containing this entire example the root interval must contain m−1,m,m+1, since x2=m±1 on its two simples. The calculation is choice-free and entirely over C. It neither extends characteristic-zero canonical-basis identifications to positive characteristic nor replaces the separate root-of-unity comparison and grading theorems.

Sources