Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

✓ 5 results · all verified · 4 also independently AI-judged
Every result on this page is machine-checked by a proof checker and read in full and owner-audited; the judge is an additional, independent cross-model AI review of the proofs. The 1 not AI-judged were verified by owner audit (typically over a confirmed judge false positive), not failures.

Clifford Bundles, Dirac Operators, and Index Interfaces: Examples and Counterexamples

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

These examples check the hypotheses and conventions of the A page at concrete boundaries. Each calculation is carried by its own proof and uses the exact dependencies recorded in the batch manifest.

The flat-torus and sphere examples use the completed complex Clifford-module and half-spin interfaces on the A page. The negative cotangent action is c0(v)=ic+(v), with the corresponding volume-chirality sign recorded there. These draft arguments have undergone the focused owner interface review; native readiness and final owner acceptance remain separate workflow records.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

None yet.

5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

CounterexampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passOpen item page →

The Euclidean Dirac operator has nonclosed range at zero

Statement

Assume Countable Choice.

For n≥1, let S0 be a nonzero finite-dimensional Hermitian module for the negative-sign complex Clifford algebra, with skew-Hermitian generators c(ej) satisfying c(ξ)2=−∣ξ∣2I. On Rn with its Euclidean metric, let D=∑j=1nc(ej)∂j,Dom⁡(D)=H1(Rn;S0)⊂L2(Rn;S0). Then D is closed and densely defined, its range is dense but not all of L2, and therefore it is not Fredholm.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable choice, the Euclidean Clifford module, and the stated H1 domain.

[F1]

The Clifford relation implies c(ξ)∗c(ξ)=∣ξ∣2I and c(ξ) is invertible for ξ≠0 with inverse norm ∣ξ∣−1 (Graded Hermitian Clifford modules and geometric Dirac operators, Universal Clifford algebra of a quadratic space).

[F2]

The Fourier transform extends to a unitary map on L2(Rn); distributional derivatives transform to multiplication by 2πiξj (Plancherel theorem, Distributional derivatives are polynomial Fourier multipliers).

[F3]

H1(Rn;S0) consists of L2 sections whose first distributional derivatives are in L2, componentwise (Integer-order Sobolev spaces and their norms).

[A1]

Countable choice is assumed by the Fourier-transform interface [F2] and the Sobolev-space interface [F3] (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

Proof

Given: The domain and operator above.

1.1A1F1F2F3construct

Under the unitary Fourier transform [F2], D is multiplication by 2πic(ξ). By [F1], its maximal multiplier domain is exactly {u∈L2:∣ξ∣u^∈L2}. If u∈H1, [F3] and the distributional derivative identity in [F2] put ∣ξ∣u^ in L2. Conversely, if ∣ξ∣u^∈L2, then each 2πiξju^ is in L2; its inverse Plancherel transform is the distributional derivative ∂ju, by the Fourier differentiation identity and injectivity of the Fourier transform on tempered distributions. Hence u∈H1 by [F3]. A multiplication operator by a measurable finite matrix is closed, since convergence of uk and c(ξ)uk in L2 has an almost-everywhere convergent subsequence and the pointwise multiplication identity passes to the limit. Schwartz sections are dense in L2, so D is densely defined and closed.

2.1F1F2step 1.1

If h is orthogonal to the range, then distributionally D∗h=0. Fourier transformation and [F2] give c(ξ)h^(ξ)=0 almost everywhere. By [F1], c(ξ) is invertible for every ξ≠0, and the singleton {0} has Lebesgue measure zero; hence h^=0 almost everywhere and h=0. Thus the range is dense.

2.2F1F2step 1.1algebra

Fix a unit vector v∈S0 and define g^(ξ)=1{0<∣ξ∣<1}∣ξ∣−(n/2−1)v. Polar coordinates give ∥g^∥22=Cn∫01rn−1−2(n/2−1) dr=Cn∫01r dr<∞, so [F2] gives g∈L2. If g=Du for some u∈H1, then for almost every ξ≠0, [F1] forces ∣u^(ξ)∣=(2π)−1∣ξ∣−1∣g^(ξ)∣. Consequently its squared norm near zero is a positive constant times ∫01rn−1−2(n/2) dr=∫01r−1 dr=∞, contradicting u∈L2. Thus g is not in the range, so the dense range is proper and not closed. A Fredholm operator must have closed range, hence D is not Fredholm.

3.1A1F1F2F3step 1.1step 2.2∎

The construction works also for n=1, where g^(ξ)=1{0<∣ξ∣<1}∣ξ∣1/2v and the displayed L2 integral is still finite; the logarithmic divergence after division by ∣ξ∣ is unchanged. The zero-frequency set has measure zero, but arbitrarily small nonzero frequencies cause the obstruction. Countable choice is used through the Fourier and Sobolev interfaces [F2]–[F3] and the almost-everywhere subsequence argument in step 1.1.

ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)Open item page →

The complex projective plane has nonzero w2 and no Spin structure

Statement

Assume full AC.

Let x=c1(γ∗) generate H2(CP2;Z), where γ is the tautological complex line. Then w2(TCP2)=ρ2(c1(TCP2))=ρ2(3x)=ρ2(x)≠0. Consequently the oriented tangent bundle of CP2 has no Spin lift.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Full AC, the complex orientation on CP2 and its tautological line.

[F1]

The Euler sequence computation gives c1(TCPn)=(n+1)x (The tangent bundle of complex projective space and its Pontryagin classes).

[F2]

H∗(CP2;Z)=Z[x]/(x3), with x a generator of H2 (Integral cohomology ring of complex projective space).

[F3]

For a complex bundle, w2(ER)=ρ2c1(E) (Mod-two reduction of Chern classes).

[F4]

The Schubert symbol formula gives one cell in each dimension 0,2,4 for CP2=Gr⁡1(C3) (Schubert cells in real and complex Grassmannians, Schubert cells give the stable Grassmannian CW structure). Cellular homology computes singular homology, and the cohomological universal-coefficient sequence is natural (Cellular homology computes singular homology, The universal coefficient theorem for cohomology over a PID, Singular cohomology with coefficients).

[F5]

An oriented real bundle admits a Spin lift exactly when its w2 vanishes (Spin structures exist exactly when w2 vanishes and then form an H1 torsor).

[A1]

Full AC is inherited through the characteristic-class and Spin-lift suppliers (The Axiom of Choice).

Proof

Given: CP2 and the stated generator x.

1.1A1F1algebra

By [F1] with n=2, c1(TCP2)=3x. The coefficient reduction ρ2 is a ring homomorphism, so ρ2(3x)=ρ2(x) because 3≡1(mod2).

1.2F2F4algebra

The CW structure in [F4] has cellular chains C4≅Z, C2≅Z, and C0≅Z, with all other groups zero. Every cellular boundary is zero because its target is zero, so cellular and singular homology give H2(CP2;Z)≅Z and H1=0. By UCT with integral coefficients, evaluation identifies H2(CP2;Z) with Hom⁡(Z,Z); since x is an integral cohomology generator by [F2], it evaluates as +1 or −1 on a homology generator. UCT with F2 coefficients identifies H2(CP2;F2) with Hom⁡(Z,F2), and naturality of coefficient reduction makes ρ2(x) evaluate as 1. Hence ρ2(x)≠0.

2.1A1F3F5step 1.1step 1.2∎

Applying [F3] to the complex tangent bundle and using steps 1.1–1.2 gives w2(TCP2)=ρ2(x)≠0. The manifold is complex-oriented, hence its tangent bundle is oriented; [F5] therefore implies that it admits no Spin lift. The coefficient group has characteristic two and no sign convention changes the nonzero class.

ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)Open item page →

Fourier modes give index zero for the periodic flat even torus

Statement

Assume full AC and dependent choice, with the complex spin-module suppliers in [A1]. On the flat torus T2m=R2m/Z2m with the periodic Spin structure and m≥1, the untwisted chiral Spin Dirac operator has index zero. Its kernel and adjoint kernel are precisely the constant positive- and negative-chirality spinors.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Full AC and dependent choice, the flat quotient torus, its translation-invariant orthonormal frame, the periodic Spin lift, and the standard normalized Haar measure.

[F1]

The periodic lift is the product principal Spin bundle over the trivial oriented orthonormal frame bundle; its spinor bundle and connection are the corresponding associated bundle and trivial connection (Even-dimensional spinor bundles, chirality, and the spin connection, Spinor and geometric Clifford bundles and connections are well defined).

[F2]

In dimension 2m, the complex spinor module splits into half-spin spaces of equal dimension 2m−1 (Complex spinor modules and complete reducibility for Euclidean Spin).

[F3]

Compact-group Plancherel makes the characters a complete orthonormal basis indexed by the Pontryagin dual; finite-product duality identifies T2m^ with (T^)2m (Compact and discrete transforms are the two extreme Plancherel cases, The one-dimensional torus and its normalized Haar integral, Duals of finite products and of discrete direct sums). The local character classification in step 1.1 identifies T^=Z.

[F4]

On a compact manifold, the chiral Dirac operator with its maximal H1 domain is Fredholm (A chiral geometric Dirac operator is Fredholm).

[A1]

Proof

Given: The periodic spinor section and the chiral Dirac operator.

1.1A1F3givenalgebra

First classify the characters of T=R/Z. If χ:T→S1 is a continuous character, let f(t)=χ([t]). By continuity at 0, choose δ>0 so that on ∣t∣<2δ the values of f lie in the arc with a continuous argument θ(t)∈(−1/8,1/8), normalized by f(t)=e2πiθ(t). Whenever ∣s∣,∣t∣,∣s+t∣<δ, the character identity gives θ(s+t)−θ(s)−θ(t)∈Z; this difference has absolute value less than 3/8, so it is zero. Define Θ(u)=Nθ(u/N) for any positive integer N with ∣u/N∣<δ. If N,N′ both work, repeated local additivity gives Nθ(u/N)=NN′θ(u/(NN′))=N′θ(u/N′), so Θ is well-defined. Choosing N large enough for s,t,s+t shows Θ(s+t)=Θ(s)+Θ(t). Near zero Θ=θ, so Θ is continuous, and the continuous additive equation gives Θ(t)=αt for some α∈R. For arbitrary t, choose N with ∣t/N∣<δ; then f(t)=f(t/N)N=e2πiαt. Since f(1)=1, α∈Z. Conversely each k∈Z defines χk([t])=e2πikt, so T^=Z. Finite-product duality now identifies the frequencies of T2m with Z2m, and compact-group Plancherel makes these characters a complete orthonormal basis.

1.2A1F1givenalgebra

The quotient R2m/Z2m has a global parallel coframe, so the Levi–Civita connection and the periodic spin connection have zero local connection matrix. For each k∈Z2m, the Fourier character ek(x)=e2πik⋅x satisfies D(ek⊗s)=2πi ek⊗c(k)s. For k≠0, c(k)2=−∣k∣2I, so c(k) is invertible.

2.1A1F1F3step 1.2

By the completeness in [F3], every L2 spinor is determined by its Fourier coefficients. For ψ∈H1, testing each weak derivative against a Fourier character and integrating over a fundamental cube gives Dψ^(k)=2πi c(k)ψ^(k); the opposite boundary faces cancel by periodicity. Thus Dψ=0 forces every nonzero-frequency coefficient to vanish by step 1.2, since c(k) is invertible there; the zero-frequency coefficient is arbitrary. The same argument on the two graded summands shows that ker⁡D+ consists exactly of constant elements of S+ and ker⁡(D+)∗=ker⁡D− consists exactly of constants in S−.

3.1A1F2F4step 2.1algebra∎

By [F2], dim⁡CS+=dim⁡CS−=2m−1. Hence the Fredholm index supplied by [F4] is dim⁡ker⁡D+−dim⁡ker⁡(D+)∗=2m−1−2m−1=0. For m=1 both dimensions are one; the zero-dimensional torus is outside the stated range m≥1. The half-spin dimensions use the exact algebra suppliers in [A1].

ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)Open item page →

The round two-sphere has zero untwisted Spin Dirac kernel

Statement

Equip S2≅CP1 with its unit round metric and complex orientation. It has a Spin structure, its scalar curvature is 2, and every smooth untwisted harmonic spinor is zero.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Full AC, the unit round sphere and the complex-projective identification with CP1.

[F2]

For a complex tangent bundle, w2=ρ2c1; an oriented bundle with w2=0 has a Spin lift (Mod-two reduction of Chern classes, Spin structures exist exactly when w2 vanishes and then form an H1 torsor).

[F3]

The unit round sphere has constant sectional curvature 1 (The round sphere has positive constant sectional curvature); in dimension two the scalar curvature is the sum of the two ordered sectional-curvature terms (Riemann curvature four-tensor).

[F4]

On a compact Spin manifold with positive scalar curvature, the untwisted spinor Dirac kernel vanishes (Positive scalar curvature annihilates untwisted spinor harmonic sections).

[A1]

Full AC is inherited through the characteristic-class and Spin-lift suppliers (The Axiom of Choice).

Proof

Given: The oriented round sphere.

1.1A1F1F2algebra

By [F1]–[F2], w2(TS2)=ρ2(2x)=0; the complex orientation orients its tangent bundle. The spin-structure criterion in [F2] supplies a Spin lift.

1.2F3givenalgebra

The sectional curvature is 1 by [F3]. In an orthonormal frame on a surface, scalar curvature is R1221+R2112=2, with the sign convention of [F3]. It is strictly positive everywhere.

2.1A1F4step 1.1step 1.2∎

Apply [F4] to the Spin structure from step 1.1 and the positive scalar curvature from step 1.2. Every smooth untwisted harmonic spinor is zero. The assertion is for the untwisted operator; a line twist has its own curvature term and is treated separately.

ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)Open item page →

A line twist on the two-sphere has nonzero index and curvature term

Statement

Assume full AC.

Let S2 have its unit round metric and complex orientation. Its tangent bundle admits a Spin lift; fix one. For each integer k, there is a Hermitian line bundle Lk with unitary curvature FLk=−2πik ω,ω=area⁡S24π,∫S2ω=1. The twisted chiral Spin Dirac index is k. In an oriented orthonormal frame the twisting term in the Lichnerowicz formula is −k2Γ, where Γ=i c(e1)c(e2) is spinor chirality. Thus for k≠0 the twist contributes a nonzero curvature endomorphism.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Full AC, the round two-sphere, its Spin structure, an integer k, and the line bundle with the displayed local connection.

[F2]

The normalized Chern character is tr⁡exp⁡(−F/(2πi)), and the A-hat form has no degree-two term (The A-hat form and relative Chern character, Chern, Pontryagin, and Euler characteristic forms).

[F3]

The curvature form of a unitary connection represents the real image of the topological first Chern class (Characteristic forms represent topological characteristic classes over the reals).

[F4]

The spin Dirac index formula applies to any finite-rank Hermitian twist, and its Lichnerowicz curvature term is ∑i<jc(ei)c(ej)FijE (The twisted Spin Dirac index is the integral of A-hat times ch(E), Lichnerowicz formula for a geometric Dirac operator).

[F5]

For S2≅CP1 with its complex orientation, x=c1(γ∗) generates H2(S2;Z) and ⟨x,[S2]⟩=1 (The tangent bundle of complex projective space and its Pontryagin classes).

[A1]

Full AC is inherited through the Spin-lift criterion, Chern–Weil, and the spin index formula (The Axiom of Choice).

Proof

Given: Spherical coordinates (θ,ϕ) away from the poles, with area form sin⁡θ dθ∧dϕ.

1.1A1F1givenconstructalgebra

By [F1], TS2 admits a Spin lift; fix one. The unit sphere has area 4π, so ω=(4π)−1sin⁡θ dθ∧dϕ. On north and south charts define unitary connection forms AN=−ik2(1−cos⁡θ)dϕ and AS=ik2(1+cos⁡θ)dϕ. They extend smoothly over their respective poles, and AS−AN=ik dϕ=g−1dg for the unitary transition g(ϕ)=eikϕ. Hence they define a Hermitian line bundle connection; differentiation gives F=dAN=dAS=−(ik/2)sin⁡θ dθ∧dϕ=−2πikω.

2.1A1F3F4F5step 1.1algebra

By [F3]–[F5], the real Chern class of this connection integrates to k, so its integral first Chern class is c1(Lk)=kx; the integral group is torsion-free by [F5], so its image in real cohomology determines it. The line-bundle curvature term in [F4] is c(e1)c(e2)F12=c(e1)c(e2)(−ik/2)=−k2Γ, because Γ=i c(e1)c(e2). This is nonzero when k≠0.

3.1A1F2F4step 1.1step 2.1∎

In dimension two A^ has only its degree-zero term 1, while tr⁡exp⁡(−F/(2πi))=1+kω because ω2=0. Applying [F4] yields ind⁡C(DS⊗Lk+)=∫S2kω=k. For k=0 both the curvature term and index vanish. The construction is smooth at both poles by the displayed vanishing factors, the orientation is the complex orientation, and the formula uses the same actual spin-module interface as [F4].

Sources