Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Finite-mode Fock, Gaussian and Bogoliubov foundations

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

This mathematics page develops finite-mode bosonic Fock and Gaussian structure. The Fock space remains infinite-dimensional at every positive mode count, and a finite number cutoff cannot preserve exact canonical commutation relations. The page fixes an explicit action scale, quadrature order, Weyl-label convention, covariance, and density-operator moment definition.

The Fock-to-Schrödinger identification, singular-block symplectic factorization, and explicit chirp, coordinate, and Fourier implementers are proved locally. The Fourier convention is the imported 2π-frequency transform, with its dilation to the angular-frequency unitary used in the coordinate formulas stated explicitly. The finite metaplectic group is then constructed from normalized homogeneous quadratic evolutions; its Maslov phase has exactly two choices over each finite symplectic matrix. Williamson reduction and a product of one-mode thermal states give the finite-mode Gaussian covariance criterion. No infinite-mode implementability theorem or experimental claim is asserted.

The page uses three independent full-text treatments: the mathematical lecture notes of Phan Thành Nam, the Gaussian review of Weedbrook et al., and the symplectic and Maslov arguments of Robbin and Salamon. Convention differences and the excluded source assertion about general Hermiticity of iΩV are recorded in the batch coverage evidence.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, postulates, theorems and proofs

LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

Finite-mode Fock to Schrödinger identification

Statement

Assume Countable Choice. Let r≥1, fix a positive real action-scale parameter ℏ>0, and let H=Cr with orthonormal basis e1,…,er, and let Fs(H)=⨁n≥0H⊗sn be the bosonic Fock space with vacuum Ω and creation and annihilation operators aj∗,aj from Hilbert direct-sum construction and Creation contraction bounds. For N=(n1,…,nr)∈N0r, set ∣N⟩:=∏j=1r(aj∗)njnj!Ω. Let gN(x)=∏j=1rgnj(xj) be the normalized product Hermite function from Multidimensional oscillator completeness. Then (∣N⟩)N and (gN)N are complete orthonormal families, and the map U∣N⟩=gN extends uniquely to a unitary U:Fs(Cr)⟶L2(Rr). On the algebraic finite-particle span, UajU−1 and Uaj∗U−1 are respectively (xj+∂xj)/2 and (xj−∂xj)/2 on product Hermite functions. In particular the quadratures Qj=ℏ/2(aj+aj∗),Pj=−iℏ/2(aj−aj∗) act there as multiplication by ℏxj and as −iℏ ∂xj, respectively. These are core identities; they do not assert that a finite number cutoff preserves the canonical commutation relations.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice, an integer r≥1, a positive real action-scale parameter ℏ>0, H=Cr, its specified orthonormal basis, and the Fock and product Hermite constructions above.

[A1]

Countable Choice is the explicit set-theoretic hypothesis used for the countable Hilbert direct sum and completeness arguments (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

[F1]

The Fock direct sum is a Hilbert space, its finite-particle subspace is dense, and its nth sector is the completed symmetric tensor power (Hilbert direct-sum construction).

[F2]

On finite-particle vectors, creation and annihilation satisfy the canonical commutation relations and the adjoint identity; in a fixed orthonormal basis, aj∣N⟩=nj∣N−ej⟩ and aj∗∣N⟩=nj+1∣N+ej⟩, with a zero term when nj=0 (Creation contraction bounds).

[F3]

The product Hermite functions gN form a complete orthonormal family in L2(Rr), and the one-coordinate Hermite recurrence is xgn=(n+1gn+1+ngn−1)/2 and gn′=(ngn−1−n+1gn+1)/2 (Multidimensional oscillator completeness, Hermite recurrence).

[F4]

A linear combination of the normalized symmetrizations of the elementary tensors in e1,…,er is dense in every symmetric tensor sector; the orthogonal symmetrizations with occupation multiplicities N, ∑jnj=n, have squared norm ∏jnj!/n! (Hilbert direct-sum construction, Creation contraction bounds).

Proof

1.1givenA1F1F2F4algebra

For fixed n, the symmetric tensors are the range of the averaging projection on (Cr)⊗n. The elementary tensors in the basis e1,…,er span the tensor power, so their averages span that range. Two such averages with different occupation vectors are orthogonal, because at least one tensor slot has orthogonal basis vectors in every paired term. For occupation vector N the squared norm of the averaged tensor is ∏jnj!/n! by counting the ∏jnj! permutations that preserve the ordered occupation word among n! permutations. Multiplying by n!/∏jnj! normalizes it. The CCR in [F2], applied successively to the vacuum, show that this normalized vector is exactly ∣N⟩; therefore the vectors ∣N⟩ are an orthonormal basis of each sector. The sector direct sum in [F1] makes their union a complete orthonormal family of Fock space.

2.1F1F3step 1.1algebra

The target family (gN) is complete orthonormal by [F3]. Hence the linear map ∣N⟩↦gN preserves norms on finite linear combinations, extends by completion to an isometry on Fock space, and is surjective because its range contains the complete family (gN) and is closed. Uniqueness follows from density of the finite span.

3.1F2F3step 2.1algebra∎

On a basis vector ∣N⟩, the ladder formulas [F2] and Hermite recurrences [F3] give UajU−1gN=njgN−ej=xj+∂xj2gN, and Uaj∗U−1gN=nj+1gN+ej=xj−∂xj2gN. Linearity proves these identities on the finite span. Adding and subtracting the two identities gives the displayed Qj,Pj formulas there. The formulas are only asserted on this core, where all terms are defined.

LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

Finite symplectic generator factorization

Statement

Let r≥1, J0=(0Ir−Ir0), and Sp⁡(2r,R)={S∈M2r(R):STJ0S=J0}. Every S∈Sp⁡(2r,R) is a finite product of matrices of the following three types and their inverses: UX=(IX0I),LY=(I0YI),DA=(A00A−T), where X,Y are real symmetric and A is real invertible. Partial Fourier rotations, which act by (qj,pj)↦(−pj,qj) on any selected set of coordinates and fix the others, are also products of these matrices. In addition, for every S there is a product G of these generators such that the upper-left block of SG is invertible.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: r≥1 and a real matrix S satisfying the displayed symplectic identity. Blocks are written in grouped coordinate order z=(q,p) with q,p∈Rr.

[A1]

The input matrix obeys STJ0S=J0 for J0=(0Ir−Ir0), and r≥1.

[F1]

Block multiplication gives, for S=(ABCD), the equivalent relation SJ0ST=J0 and in particular ABT=BAT; the original relation STJ0S=J0 gives ATC=CTA and ATD−CTB=I. These relations also imply that the first r rows of S have rank r.

Proof

1.1givenA1F1algebra

Each listed matrix is symplectic by direct multiplication with J0: UXTJ0UX=J0 iff X=XT, LYTJ0LY=J0 iff Y=YT, and DATJ0DA=J0. A quarter-turn on a subset is itself a block diagonal product of two-dimensional matrices (0−110) and identities, so is symplectic; on one selected coordinate it equals the product U−1L1U−1 in that coordinate. Thus all proposed generators are symplectic.

1.2givenF1algebra

First suppose the upper-left block A is invertible. The block equations in [F1] imply A−1B=(A−1B)T and CA−1=(CA−1)T by multiplying ABT=BAT and ATC=CTA by the relevant inverses. They also give D=A−T+CA−1B from ATD−CTB=I. Therefore direct block multiplication yields S=LCA−1DAUA−1B, which is the required factorization in this case.

1.3givenF1algebra

For arbitrary A, let k=rank⁡A. Choose invertible real matrices L,R with LAR=diag⁡(Ik,0), using row and column reduction, and replace S by S′=DLSDR. This replacement is symplectic. Write its upper-right block as B′ and partition rows and columns after the first k. The identity A′B′T=B′A′T in [F1], with A′=diag⁡(Ik,0), forces the lower-left rectangular block of B′ to vanish. Since the first r rows of S′ are independent, the bottom r−k rows of B′ restricted to its last r−k columns form an invertible matrix B22. Right-multiply S′ by the inverse partial Fourier rotation F on those last coordinates, (qj,pj)↦(pj,−qj). It is a product of the inverse listed generators. The resulting upper-left block is block upper triangular with diagonal blocks Ik and −B22, hence is invertible. This argument also covers k=0 and k=r (with the empty block omitted).

2.1step 1.1step 1.2step 1.3algebra∎

The matrix S′F has invertible upper-left block, so step 1.2 factors it into the stated generators. Since S=DL−1(S′F)F−1DR−1 and the inverses of DL,DR,F are of the same listed types, the same is true of S. This proves the factorization for every symplectic matrix.

DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

Finite-mode quadratures and symplectic data

Definition

Assume the Axiom of Choice, an integer r≥1, and an action scale ℏ>0. Inner products are linear in the first argument. Use the specified Fock-to-Schrödinger unitary U:Fs(Cr)→L2(Rr) from the earlier finite-mode identification. In Schrödinger coordinates define the self-adjoint quadratures Qj=U−1(ℏ xj)U,Pj=U−1(−iℏ ∂xj)U, where xj is the real multiplication operator on its maximal domain. Here S(Rr) consists of all f∈C∞(Rr;C) with sup⁡x∣xα∂βf(x)∣<∞ for every pair of multi-indices α,β∈N0r, identified with their L2 classes. The common Schwartz domain on Fock space means U−1S(Rr). Fix the angular-frequency Fourier unitary by [Fangf](k)=(2π)−r/2∫Rre−ik⋅xf(x) dx(f∈S(Rr)), and define −i∂xj:=Fang−1MkjFang, where Mkj is multiplication by kj on its maximal domain. Their common Schwartz core satisfies [Qj,Qk]=[Pj,Pk]=0,[Qj,Pk]=iℏδjkI. Write R=(Q1,P1,…,Qr,Pr)T and J=⨁j=1r(01−10). The Weyl unitary labelled by z=(q1,p1,…,qr,pr) is the unitary whose grouped-coordinate formula, with q=(q1,…,qr) and p=(p1,…,pr), is [W(z)f](x)=eiℏ q⋅(x+ℏp/2)f(x+ℏp). It obeys W(z)W(z′)=e−iℏzTJz′/2W(z+z′) and is regular and irreducible. By the finite-dimensional Stone–von Neumann theorem, every nonzero irreducible regular Weyl system with this finite phase space and this same nonzero central parameter is unitarily equivalent to it.

A density operator is a positive trace-class operator ρ with tr⁡ρ=1. Its quadrature second moments are finite when, for one (equivalently every) spectral expansion ρ=∑nwn∣ψn⟩⟨ψn∣ with wn>0, ∑nwn∥Rjψn∥2<∞ for every j. For such a state define dj=∑nwn⟨Rjψn,ψn⟩,Vjk=Re⁡∑nwn⟨(Rj−djI)ψn,(Rk−dkI)ψn⟩. These quantities are independent of the chosen orthonormal eigenbasis in each eigenspace. The state is Gaussian when its Weyl characteristic function has the form tr⁡(ρW(z))=exp⁡ ⁣(izTd−12zTVz)(z∈R2r), with real d and real symmetric V. Here Rj has units action, each Weyl label has units 1/action, and V has units of action. No finite particle number truncation is used.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, r≥1, ℏ>0, the finite-mode Fock space, and the Fock-to-Schrödinger unitary.

[A1]

AC supplies Countable Choice wherever invoked below and is the explicit choice hypothesis of the finite-dimensional Stone–von Neumann theorem (The Axiom of Choice, The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

[F1]

The unitary U maps the occupation basis to the product Hermite basis and carries the finite-particle span to the finite Hermite span (Finite-mode Fock to Schrödinger identification). The closed creation and annihilation operators on Fock space are mutual adjoints with their stated weighted domains (Closed adjoint sector domains); on the finite-particle core they satisfy [aj,ak∗]=δjkI and [aj,ak]=[aj∗,ak∗]=0 (Creation contraction bounds).

[F2]

The imported Fourier transform on L1 uses the 2π-frequency convention [F2πf](ξ)=∫e−2πix⋅ξf(x) dx; it extends to a unitary on L2 by Plancherel and maps Schwartz space topologically onto itself by the cited corollary (Fourier transform on complex L1 classes, Plancherel theorem, Fourier transform is a topological automorphism of Schwartz space). The C1 change-of-variables formula applies to the real dilation below (A C^1 diffeomorphism satisfies the change-of-variables formula for L^1 functions).

[F3]

Schwartz space and its seminorms have the exact membership definition of Schwartz space and its seminorms. The multiplication operator Mxf=xf on D(Mx)={f∈L2:xf∈L2} is self-adjoint. The exact scaling relation is [Fangf](k)=(2π)−r/2[F2πf](k/(2π)). The dilation on the right is unitary on L2 by change of variables. For multi-indices α,β∈N0r, define the Schwartz seminorms pα,β(g):=sup⁡x∣xα∂βg(x)∣. The chain rule gives pα,β ⁣((2π)−r/2g(⋅/(2π)))=(2π)∣α∣−∣β∣−r/2pα,β(g), and the inverse dilation has the corresponding finite reciprocal factors; thus the dilation is a topological automorphism of Schwartz space. On Schwartz space, Fang(−i∂xjf)(k)=kjFangf(k); this follows by integration by parts in the stated kernel, equivalently from F2π(−i∂xjf)(ξ)=2πξjF2πf(ξ) and the same dilation.

[F4]

The root Schrödinger Weyl system is a nonzero, regular, irreducible finite-dimensional Weyl system with central parameter λ≠0 (The Schrödinger Weyl system is regular and irreducible).

[F5]

Under AC, every nonzero irreducible regular Weyl system on a real symplectic vector space of dimension 2r with fixed nonzero central parameter λ is unitarily equivalent to the Schrödinger Weyl system (Stone–von Neumann uniqueness for finite-dimensional regular Weyl systems).

[F6]

Every positive trace-class operator of trace one has a finite or countable orthonormal eigen-expansion with nonnegative eigenvalues summing to one, and each nonzero eigenspace is finite-dimensional (Density operators and scalar spectral probability).

[F7]

Complex Hilbert-space inner products are linear in the first argument and conjugate-linear in the second (Real and complex inner product spaces, with the inner product linear in the first argument).

Proof

1.1A1F1F2F3algebra

On L2(Rr), multiplication by real xj is symmetric. If g lies in its adjoint domain with adjoint value h, testing against compactly supported functions on each box where xj is bounded gives h=xjg almost everywhere there; the boxes exhaust Rr, so xjg∈L2 and the adjoint domain is exactly D(Mxj). Thus Mxj is self-adjoint. Let Dg(k):=(2π)−r/2g(k/(2π)). The L1 Fourier definition in [F2] gives, for f∈S, Fangf=DF2πf by substitution in the defining integrals. For every g∈L2, [F2] and the change-of-variables formula in [F2] give ∥Dg∥22=(2π)−r∫∣g(k/(2π))∣2 dk=∫∣g(ξ)∣2 dξ, so D is an isometry; its inverse is D−1h(ξ)=(2π)r/2h(2πξ), so it is unitary. For Schwartz seminorms pα,β(g)=sup⁡k∣kα∂βg(k)∣, pα,β(Dg)=(2π)∣α∣−∣β∣−r/2pα,β(g), and the corresponding inverse formula has finite reciprocal factors. Hence D and D−1 are continuous on Schwartz space. Together with [F2] this proves that Fang is unitary on L2 and a topological automorphism of Schwartz space. Conjugating Mkj by it defines the self-adjoint operator −i∂xj; on Schwartz functions the kernel formula and integration by parts give Fang(−i∂xjf)=kjFangf. Schwartz functions are a core for multiplication: truncate by smooth compact cutoffs and then mollify on the resulting bounded support; dominated convergence controls f and xjf, and boundedness of xj on that support controls the mollification error. Fourier invariance of Schwartz space gives the same core assertion for the derivative. Conjugation by U therefore defines the stated self-adjoint quadratures and common core.

2.1F1F4F5step 1.1algebra

On that core, [F1] gives Qj=ℏ/2(aj+aj∗) and Pj=−iℏ/2(aj−aj∗). The creation and annihilation CCR in [F1] imply the displayed quadrature commutators by bilinearity; all products are defined on the finite Hermite span. Direct multiplication of the formula for W gives the phase e−iℏ(q⋅p′−p⋅q′)/2, which is e−iℏzTJz′/2 in interleaved notation. Its strong continuity and irreducibility follow from [F4] after the parameter-preserving change (q0,p0)=(−ℏp,q/ℏ) in the root Schrödinger formula. The real symplectic form is unchanged by that map and the central parameter is ℏ≠0. Applying [F5] proves the representation-equivalence clause with precisely its hypotheses.

3.1F6F7step 1.1step 2.1algebra∎

The positive trace-class spectral expansion in [F6] has weights summing to one. For any eigenvalue w>0, changing the orthonormal basis of its eigenspace changes the sum of squared norms ∑∥Rjψ∥2 by a unitary finite-dimensional change of basis when the eigenspace is finite-dimensional; positive trace-class compactness makes each nonzero eigenspace finite dimensional. The same basis invariance holds for the sesquilinear cross sum by polarization, and the zero eigenspace contributes nothing. Cauchy–Schwarz then gives absolute convergence of each first-moment series and of each cross-moment series under the stated second-moment bound. Thus the definitions of d,V are finite and basis independent; taking the real part makes Vjk=Vkj∈R. Finally, every finite-dimensional cutoff of Fock space has finite matrix dimension, and for square matrices A,B, tr⁡(AB−BA)=0 by expanding the diagonal entries, whereas the identity has positive trace. Hence a finite cutoff cannot satisfy the exact CCR [Qj,Pj]=iℏI.

LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

Individual finite symplectic implementers

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice. On L2(Rr), for r≥1 and ℏ>0, define the Weyl unitaries in grouped label order (q,p)∈Rr⊕Rr by [W(q,p)f](x)=eiℏ q⋅(x+ℏp/2)f(x+ℏp). For J0=(0I−I0), every T∈Sp⁡(2r,R) has a unitary MT such that MT∗W(z)MT=W(Tz)(z∈R2r). Any two such unitaries differ by a scalar of modulus one. The covariance identity holds on all of L2; the corresponding unbounded quadrature identities hold on the common transported Schwartz domain. This is an individual existence and phase-uniqueness result; it does not identify the global topology or kernel of a continuously chosen implementer family.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC (and hence Countable Choice), finite r≥1, ℏ>0, the displayed Weyl system, and T∈Sp⁡(2r,R).

[A1]

AC supplies Countable Choice by applying a choice function to the family of values of any sequence of nonempty sets. This supplies the choice hypothesis of the regular-irreducibility and Fourier inputs below; AC also permits the spectral-calculus input [F4]. The proof constructs implementers directly and does not use the Stone–von Neumann theorem (The Axiom of Choice, The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

[F1]

The displayed W are unitary and form a strongly continuous irreducible Weyl system. Under (q0,p0)=(−ℏp,q/ℏ) they are the Schrödinger system with fixed nonzero central parameter ℏ; the root lemma proves regularity and irreducibility under Countable Choice (The Schrödinger Weyl system is regular and irreducible).

[F2]

Every real symplectic matrix factors into symmetric upper and lower shears, invertible coordinate changes and partial Fourier rotations (Finite symplectic generator factorization).

[F3]

The imported 2π-frequency transform F2π is unitary on L2 and a topological automorphism of Schwartz space (Fourier transform on complex L1 classes, Plancherel theorem, Fourier transform is a topological automorphism of Schwartz space). The angular-frequency unitary is exactly Fangf(k)=(2π)−r/2(F2πf)(k/(2π))=(2π)−r/2∫e−ik⋅xf(x) dx. The real dilation is an L2 unitary by change of variables and a Schwartz automorphism: for multi-indices α,β∈N0r, define pα,β(g)=sup⁡k∣kα∂βg(k)∣; then pα,β ⁣((2π)−r/2g(⋅/(2π)))=(2π)∣α∣−∣β∣−r/2pα,β(g), and its inverse has the corresponding finite reciprocal factors. Thus Fang has both properties. Integration by parts in its kernel gives Fang(−i∂xjf)=kjFangf for every f∈S.

[F4]

For a bounded normal operator on a nonzero complex Hilbert space, its spectral projection valued measure represents its bounded Borel functional calculus; a projection commuting with the operator's generated unitaries is therefore available from the spectral calculus of a commuting self-adjoint operator (Spectral theorem for bounded normal operators pvm form).

[F5]

If T:U→V is a C1 diffeomorphism of open subsets of Rr and g∈L1(V), then ∫Vg(y)dy=∫Ug(T(x))∣det⁡DT(x)∣dx; for T(x)=Ax and g=∣f∣2, this gives ∥DAf∥2=∥f∥2 (A C^1 diffeomorphism satisfies the change-of-variables formula for L^1 functions).

Proof

1.1givenA1F1F5algebra

The formula for W is a unitary composition of translation and a modulus-one multiplier; its inverse is W(−q,−p). Direct substitution gives W(q,p)W(q′,p′)=e−iℏ(q⋅p′−p⋅q′)/2W(q+q′,p+p′). For a real symmetric X, the chirp [CXf](x)=eixTXx/2f(x) is unitary, and substitution in the Weyl formula gives CX∗W(q,p)CX=W(q+Xp,p), the upper shear. For invertible real A, [DAf](x)=∣det⁡A∣1/2f(Ax) is unitary by [F5] applied to the diffeomorphism x↦Ax and the integrable function ∣f∣2; direct substitution gives DA∗W(q,p)DA=W(A−Tq,Ap), an invertible coordinate change.

2.1F2F3step 1.1algebra

Let Fang be the exact angular-frequency unitary of [F3]. Substitution into the Fourier integral on Schwartz functions gives [FangW(q,p)f](k)=eiℏ p⋅(k−ℏq/2)[Fangf](k−ℏq), which is exactly [W(p,−q)Fangf](k). Both sides are bounded operators, and Schwartz functions are dense, so this identity holds on all of L2. Applying it to selected coordinates gives partial Fourier rotations. Conjugating an upper shear by the full or partial Fourier rotation gives every lower shear, since the matrix identity is (0−II0)UX(0I−I0)=L−X. Thus each generator and inverse in [F2] has a unitary Weyl implementer.

3.1F2step 1.1step 2.1algebra

Each generator unitary maps Schwartz space onto itself: this follows from the product rule for the smooth quadratic chirp, the chain rule for an invertible linear coordinate change, and Fourier invariance of Schwartz space. On any connected parameter neighborhood on which A remains invertible, the chirp and coordinate formulas vary continuously in every Schwartz seminorm; the Fourier factor is fixed. If G1∗W(z)G1=W(T1z) and G2∗W(z)G2=W(T2z), then (G1G2)∗W(z)(G1G2)=W(T2T1z). Therefore, for any finite factorization T=Tk⋯T1 supplied by [F2], multiplying the corresponding generator unitaries in the order G1⋯Gk gives a unitary MT with MT∗W(z)MT=W(Tz) for every label z. This proves existence and does not invoke a general metaplectic existence theorem.

4.1F1F4step 3.1algebra∎

Suppose M1,M2 implement the same T. Then X=M2M1∗ commutes with every W(z) by applying their two covariance identities. Since the Weyl system is irreducible by [F1], every spectral projection of either bounded self-adjoint operator Re⁡X=(X+X∗)/2 and Im⁡X=(X−X∗)/(2i) commutes with every W(z) and has invariant range. Irreducibility forces each such projection to be 0 or I. The spectral measure in [F4] then implies each self-adjoint part is scalar: if a bounded self-adjoint operator had two distinct spectral values, disjoint neighborhoods of those values would yield a nonzero proper spectral projection. Hence X=λI for some λ∈C; since X is unitary, ∣λ∣=1. Thus M1,M2 differ only by a phase.

LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

Maslov phase parity in a finite generating chart

Statement

Use the finite-mode conventions, including their Axiom of Choice assumption, of the finite-mode symplectic-data definition. Let r≥1, ℏ>0, and put J0=(0Ir−Ir0). In grouped order (q,p), write S=(ABCD)∈M2r(R),A,B,C,D∈Mr(R),STJ0S=J0, and assume its upper-right block B is invertible. Define Rg:=(Q1,…,Qr,P1,…,Pr)T. Fix a compact interval I=[0,T] with T>0. For each j∈{1,2}, let Kj:I→M2r(R) have Lebesgue-integrable entries in grouped order and satisfy Kj(t)=Kj(t)T for every t. Let Sj:I→M2r(R) be absolutely continuous with Sj(0)=I2r, S˙j(t)=J0Kj(t)Sj(t) almost everywhere, and Sj(T)=S. Define the real symmetrically ordered quadratic operator on S(Rr) by Hj,t:=14∑a,b=12r(Kj)ab(t)((Rg)a(Rg)b+(Rg)b(Rg)a), with no linear or scalar term. Assume Uj:I→U(L2(Rr)) is a path of unitary Schwartz automorphisms with Uj(0)=I such that, for each f∈S(Rr), the path t↦Uj(t)f is absolutely continuous in every Schwartz seminorm and satisfies iℏ ∂tUj(t)f=Hj,tUj(t)f almost everywhere. Here a unitary Schwartz automorphism is a unitary on L2 whose restriction is a continuous linear bijection of S with continuous inverse, and the Schwartz seminorms are pα,β(f)=sup⁡x∣xα∂βf(x)∣ for multi-indices α,β. Absolute continuity of each trajectory means the usual finite disjoint-interval condition for its increments in every seminorm. These hypotheses include piecewise-smooth Hamiltonian paths. Then U2(T)=U1(T)orU2(T)=−U1(T). The same conclusion holds after multiplying both propagators by a fixed normalized quadratic propagator, provided the resulting endpoint lies in a chart with invertible upper-right block.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The exact finite-mode and absolute-continuity conventions in the Statement. In particular, Rg=(Q1,…,Qr,P1,…,Pr)T and K,J0,S use grouped order; in Schrödinger coordinates Q=ℏx, P=−iℏ∂x, transported by the given Fock–Schrödinger unitary when necessary, and p=−i∂x. All time derivatives below are almost-everywhere derivatives and all endpoint identities use the continuous representatives on [0,T].

[F1]

The finite-mode definition supplies AC, the quadrature and Weyl conventions, the Schwartz domain and the regular irreducible Weyl system. Finite-mode quadratures and symplectic data

[F2]

For a symplectic block matrix with A invertible, Y=CA−1 and X=A−1B are symmetric and S=LYDAUX. Every symplectic matrix is a finite product of the elementary matrices. Finite symplectic generator factorization

[F3]

The Weyl system is irreducible; two unitaries inducing the same symplectic Weyl covariance differ by a scalar of modulus one. Individual finite symplectic implementers

[F4]

The imported 2π-frequency transform F2π is unitary on L2 and a topological automorphism of Schwartz space (Fourier transform on complex L1 classes, Plancherel theorem, Fourier transform is a topological automorphism of Schwartz space). The exact angular-frequency unitary used here is Fangf(k)=(2π)−r/2(F2πf)(k/(2π))=(2π)−r/2∫e−ik⋅xf(x) dx. The dilation is unitary by A C^1 diffeomorphism satisfies the change-of-variables formula for L^1 functions; for Schwartz seminorms it scales by (2π)∣α∣−∣β∣−r/2, with inverse scaling by finite reciprocal factors. Thus the angular transform is also a Schwartz automorphism. Integration by parts gives Fang(−i∂xjf)=kjFangf on Schwartz space.

[F5]

In ZF, AC implies DC and DC implies Countable Choice (AC implies DC implies countable choice). The real-valued AC fundamental theorem therefore applies under the AC hypothesis in [F1]: an absolutely continuous real function has an integrable derivative and is reconstructed from it, so zero derivative almost everywhere implies constancy. Fundamental theorem of calculus for absolutely continuous functions Absolute continuity on a compact interval

[F6]

For any fixed integrable representative f∈L1[a,b], the primitive x↦∫axf has derivative f almost everywhere. This supplier assumes Countable Choice. The indefinite integral of an L1 function is differentiable almost everywhere

Proof

technique · construct quadratic evolution from elementary operators near the identity, then determine its possible scalar phase from the transported Gaussian, without an imported oscillatory-kernel or Maslov-index theorem
1.1F1F2F4constructalgebra

Put J0=(0I−I0). For f∈S, the L1 definitions give the exact dilation identity Fangf(k)=(2π)−r/2(F2πf)(k/(2π)). The change-of-variables formula with k=2πξ proves this dilation is unitary on L2; differentiating its argument shows pα,β(Dg)=(2π)∣α∣−∣β∣−r/2pα,β(g), and the inverse dilation has the reciprocal seminorm factors, so it is a Schwartz automorphism. Integration by parts in the angular kernel gives Fang(−i∂xjf)=kjFangf. Thus the angular transform is precisely the required unitary, derivative and Schwartz-space consequence of the imported 2π transform, rather than a differently normalized Plancherel claim. Near the identity the block A is invertible with positive determinant. For the factorization in [F2] define CYf(x)=eixTYx/2f(x), EAf(x)=(det⁡A)−1/2f(A−1x) and TX=Fang−1e−ikTXk/2Fang. Each is unitary by change of variables or [F4]. The product rule and linear change of variables show that each factor and its inverse act continuously on Schwartz space and depend smoothly on their parameters there. For example every derivative of a chirp is a polynomial times the same chirp, giving bounds by finitely many Schwartz seminorms, uniformly on compact parameter sets; differentiation in a parameter inserts only another polynomial or a first-order differential operator. The same argument applies in Fourier coordinates to TX by [F4]. Direct differentiation or substitution gives CY∗RgCY=LYRg, EA∗RgEA=DARg, and TX∗RgTX=UXRg. The same substitutions in the explicit Weyl formula give covariance on all L2. Thus L(S):=CYEATX is a smooth local unitary Schwartz lift of S, with L(I)=I. Shrink the neighborhood so A is sufficiently close to I; then replacing (Y,A,X) by (τY,I+τ(A−I),τX), 0≤τ≤1, gives a smooth operator path from I to L(S) within these formulas.

2.1F1step 1.1algebra

Along an absolutely continuous local parameter path the three logarithmic generators iℏC˙YCY−1, iℏE˙AEA−1 and iℏT˙XTX−1 are respectively −ℏxTY˙x/2, −iℏ((A˙A−1x)⋅∂x+tr⁡(A˙A−1)/2) and ℏpTX˙p/2. These identities hold almost everywhere by finite-dimensional differentiation at the points where the parameters have derivatives. The half-trace in the middle expression is exactly the symmetric ordering of the mixed position-momentum term. Product differentiation conjugates and adds these expressions. The covariance from step 1.1 replaces each quadrature by a real linear combination, so a symmetrically ordered homogeneous quadratic stays exactly such a quadratic, with no extra scalar. If its coefficient matrix is KL, differentiating the covariance and using [Rj,Rk]=iℏ(J0)jk gives S˙=J0KLS, hence KL=−J0S˙S−1. Equality of the quadratic coefficients is literal: the coefficients of second derivatives, of xj∂k, and of xjxk determine the three real blocks, including the symmetric-order half-trace.

3.1F1F4F5F6step 1.1step 2.1constructalgebra

Put V(t)=J0K(t) and m(t)=∫0t∥V(s)∥ ds. The iterated-integral series for the matrix equation has nth term bounded by m(t)n/n!: the scalar product integrand is symmetric in its n variables and the ordered simplex is one of the n! equal regions of their product cube, up to null diagonals. Thus the series converges uniformly, with sum bounded by em(T). It satisfies S(t)=I+∫0tV(s)S(s) ds, since the series under that integral is dominated by ∥V(s)∥em(T). For any integrable scalar f, choose M with ∫∣f∣>M∣f∣<ε/2; then ∫E∣f∣≤Mλ(E)+ε/2, proving absolute continuity of its primitive by the finite disjoint-interval definition. Applied entrywise to the integral equation, this proves absolute continuity of S, and [F6] gives S˙=VS almost everywhere. If two solutions have the same initial value, their continuous difference obeys Δ(t)=∫0tV(s)Δ(s) ds. Iterating this equation n times gives ∥Δ(t)∥≤sup⁡s∥Δ(s)∥m(T)n/n!, which tends to zero. This proves uniqueness of the classical absolutely continuous solution. Product differentiation gives (STJ0S)′=0 almost everywhere, so [F5] and its initial value give symplecticity at every time. A finite subdivision, using uniform continuity and invertibility of S, makes each S(t)S(tj)−1 lie in the neighborhood of step 1.1. Set U(t)=L(S(t)S(tj)−1)U(tj), with U(0)=I. To justify the Schwartz calculus, restrict each parameter path to a small compact neighborhood where the local factors are smooth. The seminorm estimates of step 1.1, also for their parameter derivatives, imply p((L(α)−L(β))f)≤Cp,q∣α−β∣q(f) there and p(∂tL(α(t))f)≤Cp,q∣α′(t)∣q(f) almost everywhere, for some Schwartz seminorm q. One can obtain the first bound by integrating along the straight parameter segment inside that neighborhood; finite smaller neighborhoods suffice. Matrix inversion and the local factor parameters have bounded derivatives on those sets, and ∣S′∣≤em(T)∥V∥ is integrable. A finite-dimensional smooth map with bounded derivative on the small convex parameter neighborhood is Lipschitz there, hence takes an absolutely continuous parameter curve to an absolutely continuous curve; at points of differentiability of that curve, its differentiability gives the chain rule directly. The same derivative estimate in each seminorm proves this assertion for the explicit Schwartz-valued factors. Products are covered by the two-variable version of those bounds. Thus these estimates prove absolute continuity in every seminorm, the chain and product rules almost everywhere, and the same assertions for the inverse factors. Step 2.1 therefore gives iℏU˙=HKU almost everywhere, with continuous matching at joins and covariance from step 1.1. If two such evolutions have the same initial vector, their difference w(t) is absolutely continuous in L2 and satisfies the same equation. Its squared norm is absolutely continuous and has derivative 2Re⁡⟨−iHKw/ℏ,w⟩=0 almost everywhere, because the real symmetrically ordered expression is symmetric on Schwartz space by integration by parts. By [F5] the difference remains zero. Density and unitarity extend uniqueness to all L2. Thus existence, uniqueness, inverse continuity and covariance hold for the full integrable coefficient class in the Statement.

4.1F1step 3.1algebra

Write K=(abbTd) with a,d real symmetric, and S=(ABCD). Set F=A+iB and G=C+iD. The symplectic block relations give F∗G−G∗F=2iI and FTG=GTF. If Fv=0, multiplying the first identity by v∗ and v forces ∥v∥2=0; thus F is invertible at every time, even at a singular generating chart. Consequently Z:=GF−1 is symmetric and Im⁡Z=(Z−Z∗)/(2i)=F−∗F−1>0. The classical equation gives F˙=(bT+dZ)F and Z˙=−a−bZ−ZbT−ZdZ, with F(0)=I and Z(0)=iI.

5.1F1F5F6step 3.1step 4.1constructalgebra

Let c(0)=1 and c˙/c=−12tr⁡(b+dZ), defining c by the exponential of the indefinite integral of this L1 coefficient; it is integrable because b,d are integrable and Z is continuous and bounded on the compact time interval. By the primitive estimate in step 3.1, [F6] and the smooth chain rule on the bounded range of this integral, c is absolutely continuous and satisfies that equation almost everywhere. It never vanishes. Define g(t,x)=π−r/4c(t)exp⁡(ixTZ(t)x/2). Positive definiteness of Im⁡Z makes g Schwartz. On the compact time interval Im⁡Z has a uniform positive lower eigenvalue. Every parameter derivative of this Gaussian is a polynomial times a Gaussian, so the same seminorm estimates as in step 3.1 make g absolutely continuous in each Schwartz seminorm and justify the almost-everywhere derivatives below. In these dimensionless coordinates HK/ℏ=12(xTax+xTbp+pTbTx+pTdp). Applying this differential expression to g gives HKg/ℏ=(xT(a+bZ+ZbT+ZdZ)x/2−itr⁡(b+dZ)/2)g. Steps 4.1 and the equation for c identify this with i∂tg. As g(0)=g0:=π−r/4e−∣x∣2/2, the uniqueness in step 3.1 gives U(t)g0=g(t). No physical-coordinate factor of ℏ is missing: both the Schrödinger equation and the quadratic contain that common factor.

6.1F5step 4.1step 5.1algebra

Differentiating the determinant by its finite polynomial formula gives (det⁡F)′=(det⁡F)tr⁡(F−1F˙). Since the trace of bT equals the trace of b, steps 4.1 and 5.1 give (c2det⁡F)′=0 almost everywhere. Put h:=c2det⁡F=u+iv with real and imaginary parts u,v. The entries of F and c are absolutely continuous and bounded on [0,T], so their finite polynomial products h,u,v are absolutely continuous. On the full-measure set where the displayed derivative identity holds and h is differentiable, h′=0 implies u′=v′=0; hence both real derivatives vanish almost everywhere. By the real-valued theorem [F5], u and v are constant on [0,T]. Since h(0)=1, h(t)=1 for every t, including all subdivision joins. It uses neither a choice of a global square root nor a real generating-chart denominator.

7.1F3step 3.1step 4.1step 6.1algebra∎

For the two endpoint propagators of the Statement, step 3.1 supplies the same Weyl covariance at their common S. By [F3], U2(T)=λU1(T) with ∣λ∣=1. Step 4.1 gives the same endpoint Z for both Gaussian vectors, and step 6.1 gives c22=c12=1/det⁡(A+iB). Since c1≠0, λ=c2/c1 and λ2=1, so U2(T)=±U1(T). This proves the required invertible-B claim and in fact the same phase conclusion at every endpoint. Multiplying both unitaries by any fixed normalized quadratic propagator preserves their relative sign, proving the final clause.

Remarks

The historical title records the phase-parity application. The proof establishes the stated sign ambiguity by an ordinary finite Gaussian differential equation; it imports no Maslov-index, path-integral convergence, or metaplectic-cover theorem. The cited literature remains attribution for the established statement. No new full-text source reading or external proof acceptance is asserted by this local reconstruction.

TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

Finite symplectic implementation by quadratic generators

Statement

Assume AC, r≥1, and ℏ>0. Let R=(Q1,P1,…,Qr,Pr)T, J=⨁j=1r(01−10), and let W(z) be the regular irreducible Weyl system of Finite-mode quadratures and symplectic data. For every real S∈Sp⁡(2r,R), there is a unitary MS on L2(Rr) such that MS∗W(z)MS=W(STz)(z∈R2r); equivalently, MS∗RMS=SR on the common transported Schwartz core. Any two such implementers differ by a scalar of modulus one. The same construction applies in every nonzero irreducible regular representation with this finite phase space and fixed central parameter ℏ, after the unitary equivalence of Finite canonical representation interface.

There is also a connected topological group Mp⁡(2r,R) of normalized propagators of real homogeneous quadratic Hamiltonians on this finite-mode Schrödinger space. Here a unitary Schwartz automorphism means a unitary on L2(Rr) whose restriction is a continuous linear bijection of the Schwartz space S(Rr) with continuous inverse. A normalized propagator is defined on a compact interval [0,T] with 0<T<∞. Its coefficient path K:[0,T]→M2r(R) has Lebesgue-integrable entries and is symmetric, K(t)=K(t)T for every t; an almost-everywhere symmetric integrable path is understood through a symmetric representative. In the displayed interleaved quadrature order put Ht=14∑a,b=12rKab(t)(RaRb+RbRa)on S(Rr), with no linear or scalar term. The path U:[0,T]→U(L2(Rr)) consists of unitary Schwartz automorphisms, has U(0)=I, and for every f∈S(Rr) its trajectory U(t)f is absolutely continuous in each Schwartz seminorm pα,β(g)=sup⁡x∣xα∂βg(x)∣ and satisfies iℏ ∂tU(t)f=HtU(t)f almost everywhere. Absolute continuity in a seminorm means the finite disjoint-interval condition for the seminorms of the increments. The construction below proves existence, uniqueness and continuity of the inverse path in the same pointwise Schwartz topology. Precisely, Mp⁡(2r,R) is the set of all endpoint operators U(T) for this integrable-coefficient class, over all such T and K. Piecewise-smooth coefficient paths are included and yield the same endpoint set, as proved below; the definition does not restrict the admissible propagators to that subclass. Give Mp⁡ the topology of pointwise convergence of U and U−1 on S(Rr) in its Schwartz topology; give Sp⁡(2r,R) its usual matrix topology. The map π:Mp⁡(2r,R)⟶Sp⁡(2r,R),M⟼Swhen M∗W(z)M=W(STz), is a two-fold covering homomorphism. Its two points over S act by MS and −MS when MS denotes either normalized lift; an arbitrary Weyl implementer may differ from them by any scalar phase. This connected double cover and its unitary action are the metaplectic group and metaplectic representation. All mode counts here are finite; no infinite-mode implementation claim is part of the statement.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, r≥1, ℏ>0, the finite-mode quadrature and Weyl conventions of Finite-mode quadratures and symplectic data, and STJS=J.

[A1]

AC is the explicit choice hypothesis of the finite-dimensional Stone–von Neumann theorem and supplies Countable Choice where needed (The Axiom of Choice, The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

[A2]

The matrix S is real symplectic, r≥1, and ℏ>0 under the quadrature and Weyl conventions in the Statement.

[F1]

The local Weyl system has the stated fixed central parameter, regularity, and irreducibility. Every nonzero irreducible regular finite-dimensional Weyl system with this same nonzero parameter is unitarily equivalent to it (Finite-mode quadratures and symplectic data, Stone–von Neumann uniqueness for finite-dimensional regular Weyl systems, Finite canonical representation interface).

[F2]

Every finite symplectic matrix factors into symmetric shears, invertible coordinate changes, and partial Fourier rotations, including when its initial upper-left block is singular (Finite symplectic generator factorization).

[F3]

Every such symplectic matrix has a unitary Weyl implementer, and two implementers of the same Weyl automorphism differ only by phase (Individual finite symplectic implementers).

[F4]

In the local reconstruction of Maslov phase parity in a finite generating chart, write Rg=(Q1,…,Qr,P1,…,Pr)T and take the coefficient matrix K(t), J0, and classical matrix S(t) in that grouped order. Its Proof, steps 1.1–4.1, constructs the unique normalized propagator for every entrywise integrable real symmetric K(t), in particular for every piecewise-smooth K. It is a unitary Schwartz automorphism, depends continuously on time together with its inverse, and has the Weyl covariance of its classical matrix solution S˙=J0KS. Near the identity a smooth local lift is L(S)=CCA−1EATA−1B, with the chirp, coordinate and Fourier-multiplier factors explicitly defined there. Their parameter derivatives are homogeneous symmetrically ordered quadratics, and their Schwartz seminorm bounds are locally uniform. This is a proved local construction, not an external time-slicing theorem.

[F5]

The same supplier proves the sign ambiguity for normalized quadratic propagators with the same endpoint. Its Proof, steps 5.1–7.1, obtains Z=(C+iD)(A+iB)−1 and c2det⁡(A+iB)=1 for the transported vacuum; step 7.1 combines this with phase uniqueness to give U2=±U1. In particular its stated generating-chart conclusion is available, and the local calculation actually applies at all endpoints. Maslov phase parity in a finite generating chart

[F6]

The one-mode oscillator has normalized eigenvectors ∣n⟩ with H=12(Q2+P2)=ℏ(N+12) and N∣n⟩=n∣n⟩ (Finite-mode Fock to Schrödinger identification, Multidimensional oscillator completeness).

Proof

1.1A1A2F2F3givenalgebra

Reorder interleaved coordinates by the fixed permutation P(Q1,P1,…,Qr,Pr)=(Q1,…,Qr,P1,…,Pr), and write Rg:=PR and Wg(w)=W(PTw) for grouped labels. Then J0=PJPT and Sg=PSPT obeys SgTJ0Sg=J0. Apply [F3] directly to the grouped Weyl system on L2(Rr) with label matrix SgT; this matrix is symplectic because SgTJ0Sg=J0 also implies SgJ0SgT=J0. Since SgTP=PST, converting labels back gives MS∗W(z)MS=MS∗Wg(Pz)MS=Wg(SgTPz)=W(STz). Differentiating the bounded one-parameter Weyl identity on the common Schwartz core gives MS∗RMS=SR. For the rest of the proof abbreviate Rg to R and Sg to S, so R, K, and J0 all use grouped order.

2.1F1F4F6givenalgebra

Use exactly the endpoint definition and trajectory class in the Statement, on arbitrary compact intervals [0,T] with T>0. Reordering by the fixed permutation of step 1.1 sends K to PKPT and preserves entrywise integrability, reality and symmetry, so [F4] constructs and uniquely determines these evolutions in grouped order with Ht=14∑j,kKjk(t)(RjRk+RkRj) and no linear or scalar term. The operator acts on the common Schwartz space, and each trajectory is absolutely continuous in every seminorm and solves the equation almost everywhere. Concatenation gives products: first evolve by U2 on [0,T2], then evolve by U1 on [0,T1] with initial vector U2(T2)f, obtaining endpoint U1(T1)U2(T2). The concatenated coefficient is integrable and symmetric on [0,T2+T1], and the two absolutely continuous trajectories match at the join. The reversed evolution U(T−t)U(T)−1 starts at I, ends at U(T)−1, and is generated almost everywhere by −HT−t, whose symmetric coefficient is again integrable. Thus inverses also belong to the set. By [F4], each endpoint implements the symplectic solution S˙=J0K(t)S. If two matrices had the same implementing unitary, differentiating their Weyl covariances on Schwartz space would give (S−S′)R=0. Applied to the vacuum, Qkg0=ℏ/2gek and Pkg0=iℏ/2gek by [F6]; the reality of the rows forces both their position and momentum coefficients to vanish. Thus the endpoint is unique. For two lifts, π(M1M2)=π(M1)π(M2) by conjugating the quadratures, so π is a homomorphism.

2.2F1F3step 1.1algebra

If M1,M2 implement the same S, then [F3] makes M2M1∗=λI for some ∣λ∣=1. For any other representation W′ in [F1], choose a unitary V with VW′(z)V∗=W(z) by the finite-dimensional Stone–von Neumann theorem. Then MS′=V∗MSV is unitary and MS′∗W′(z)MS′=V∗MS∗W(z)MSV=W′(STz). Conjugating the phase-uniqueness statement by V proves the same result in that representation.

3.1F2F4step 2.1algebra

Every generator from [F2] is a path endpoint of a homogeneous quadratic Hamiltonian. A symmetric shear is joined to the identity by scaling its symmetric block, and a partial Fourier rotation is joined by varying the oscillator angle. If det⁡A>0, polar decomposition writes A=OP with O∈SO(r) and P positive definite. The path Pt=(1−t)I+tP stays positive definite, and an orthogonal matrix in SO(r) is a product of plane rotations, each joined to the identity by varying its angle. These paths connect the coordinate change to the identity. If det⁡A<0, factor one coordinate reflection from a positive-determinant change; that reflection is a π oscillator rotation on that mode. This gives a piecewise-smooth symplectic path for each generator. Along any such path St, the matrix Xt=S˙tSt−1 satisfies XtTJ0+J0Xt=0; hence Kt=−J0Xt is symmetric and S˙t=J0KtSt. The symmetrically ordered quadratic with matrix Kt therefore has this classical endpoint. Thus [F2] supplies, for every S, a product of normalized quadratic propagators whose endpoint is S, proving π is onto. The one-parameter paths also show that each such product belongs to the identity component of Mp⁡.

3.2F4F5step 2.1algebra

If two normalized lifts lie over the same grouped matrix S, the Gaussian determinant calculation in [F5] makes them differ by sign. This already holds for every S: the matrix A+iB used there is invertible by symplecticity, including when either real block is singular. In particular it supplies the required invertible-B chart argument without an imported Maslov-index parity formula. Thus every fiber has at most two elements.

4.1F4F6step 3.1step 3.2algebra

The identity has two distinct lifts. The constant zero Hamiltonian gives I. On the first mode (and as the identity on the other modes if r>1), take the canonical Schwartz evolution of H=ℏ(N+1/2) constructed in [F4]. For each Hermite vector, e−it(n+1/2)∣n⟩ solves the same Schrödinger equation with that initial vector, so uniqueness in [F4] identifies U(t)∣n⟩=e−it(n+1/2)∣n⟩. Its classical endpoint is the identity at t=2π, because its Hamilton equations are Q˙=P, P˙=−Q and make one full rotation, while by [F6] U(2π)∣n⟩=e−2πi(n+1/2)∣n⟩=−∣n⟩ for every n. Completeness of the Hermite basis gives U(2π)=−I. For any S, choose a normalized lift M~S supplied by step 3.1. Then M~S and −M~S are two distinct lifts; step 3.2 proves there are no others. The kernel is exactly {I,−I}.

5.1F4step 2.1step 3.1step 4.1constructalgebra

Fix S0 and a normalized lift M0. On a matrix neighborhood B of S0 small enough that SS0−1 lies in the local neighborhood of [F4], put σ(S)=L(SS0−1)M0. The parameter path (Y,A,X)↦(τY,I+τ(A−I),τX) in [F4] joins each local factor lift to I smoothly, with homogeneous quadratic logarithmic generator. Thus the local factors are endpoints of the piecewise-smooth subclass of the integrable class defining this group, so σ(S) belongs to Mp⁡ and has endpoint S. Conversely the construction of [F4] writes any integrable-coefficient propagator endpoint as a finite product of these same local lifts. Hence allowing the broader integrable temporal class in the parity lemma introduces no additional endpoint operators or phases. It depends continuously on S, as does its inverse, pointwise in the Schwartz topology: the explicit chirp and linear-coordinate factors have uniformly bounded seminorm estimates on compact parameter neighborhoods, and the Fourier factors are fixed continuous maps. These estimates also justify continuity when composing such a varying local factor with a varying Schwartz vector. Step 4.1 shows every lift over S is exactly σ(S) or −σ(S).

6.1F4F6step 1.1step 4.1step 5.1algebra

The endpoint map is continuous for the specified operator topology, without assuming joint continuity of arbitrary Schwartz-operator composition. For each row j and mode k, covariance and [F6] give ⟨RjMg0,Mgek⟩=ℏ/2(Sj,Qk+iSj,Pk), where the pairing is linear in its first argument. On the left Rj is continuous on Schwartz space, its inclusion into L2 is continuous, and only the two fixed input vectors g0,gek are used. Thus every real matrix entry of π(M) is continuous. Over B, the scalar ε(M):=⟨Mg0,σ(π(M))g0⟩ is continuous, takes exactly the values +1,−1, and distinguishes the two lifts since ∥g0∥=1. Therefore the two inverse images ε−1(1) and ε−1(−1) in π−1(B) are disjoint open sheets; on each, π and ±σ are continuous inverse maps onto B. This proves the two-fold covering in the given topology.

7.1F4step 2.1step 3.1step 4.1step 5.1step 6.1algebra∎

The same charts make the set a topological group. Locally its elements are εσ(S). Products and inverses of their explicit finite-parameter factors depend continuously on the matrix parameters and on each Schwartz vector, by the uniform seminorm bounds in step 5.1; their endpoint matrices multiply and invert continuously. The sign relative to a local section at the resulting endpoint is recovered by the continuous vacuum pairing in step 6.1. Hence multiplication and inversion are continuous in these charts, which have precisely the operator topology by step 6.1. Finally every defining normalized path is continuous in that topology by [F4], including its inverse path, so it joins its endpoint to I. Consequently the group is path connected. Together with step 4.1 this proves the connected double cover with kernel {I,−I} and its defining unitary action, retaining the unrestricted phase ambiguity only for arbitrary individual Weyl implementers.

TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

Finite Bogoliubov implementability

Statement

Assume AC, r≥1, and the finite-mode Fock conventions of Finite-mode quadratures and symplectic data. Let U,V∈Mr(C) obey UU∗−VV∗=Ir,UVT=VUT, where ∗ is conjugate transpose and T is transpose without conjugation. On the transported Schwartz domain DS:=U−1S(Rr), which contains the finite-particle core (the finite Hermite span under U), use aj=(Qj+iPj)/2ℏ and aj∗=(Qj−iPj)/2ℏ, and define aj′=∑k(Ujkak+Vjkak∗). Let R=(Q1,P1,…,Qr,Pr)T, J and W(z) have the interleaved conventions of the definition. Define the real permutation matrix Π by Π(x1,y1,…,xr,yr)T=(x1,…,xr,y1,…,yr)T, and, writing Q=(Q1,…,Qr)T and P=(P1,…,Pr)T, set Rg=ΠR=(QP),J0=ΠJΠT=(0Ir−Ir0),Wg(w)=W(ΠTw). Then the aj′ satisfy [aj′,(ak′)∗]=δjkI and [aj′,ak′]=0 on the finite Hermite core. The real matrix Sg=(Re⁡(U+V)−Im⁡(U−V)Im⁡(U+V)Re⁡(U−V)) is symplectic in grouped coordinate order: SgTJ0Sg=J0. There is a unitary M on finite-mode Fock, obtained by transporting an individual finite symplectic implementer through the Fock–Schrödinger unitary, such that M∗aM=a′ and M∗RgM=SgRg on the transported Schwartz core, and M∗Wg(w)M=Wg(SgTw)(w∈R2r). Equivalently, with the interleaved matrix Si=ΠTSgΠ, M∗W(z)M=W(SiTz) for every interleaved label z. The transformed vacuum MΩ has finite mean number ∑j∥ajMΩ∥2=tr⁡(VV∗). No infinite-mode implementability assertion is made.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, finite r≥1, matrices U,V satisfying the two displayed matrix identities, the finite-mode Fock vacuum Ω, and the quadrature and Weyl conventions of the definition.

[A1]

The matrices obey UU∗−VV∗=Ir and UVT=VUT, with AC adopted for the finite-dimensional uniqueness interface (The Axiom of Choice).

[F1]

On the finite Hermite span, [aj,ak∗]=δjkI and all annihilators mutually commute, as do all creators; ajΩ=0 and aj∗Ω=∣ej⟩ (Creation contraction bounds, Finite-mode Fock to Schrödinger identification).

[F2]

With Qj=ℏ/2(aj+aj∗) and Pj=−iℏ/2(aj−aj∗), the matrix Sg is the unique real coefficient matrix satisfying a′=(SgRg)Q+i(SgRg)P2ℏ on that core, where Q=(Q1,…,Qr)T, P=(P1,…,Pr)T and the subscripts denote the first and last r grouped components; this follows by separating real and imaginary parts.

[F3]

Every interleaved finite symplectic matrix Si has an implementer M∗W(z)M=W(SiTz) and M∗RM=SiR on the transported Schwartz core; conjugating by the fixed interleaved-to-grouped permutation gives the same covariance for grouped matrices (Finite symplectic implementation by quadratic generators).

[F4]

The Fock–Schrödinger map is unitary, sends Ω to g0⊗r, and sends the finite-particle span to the finite Hermite span (Finite-mode Fock to Schrödinger identification).

Proof

1.1A1F1givenalgebra

Expand the commutator using [F1]. The only nonzero terms in [aj′,(ak′)∗] are ∑lUjlUkl‾−∑lVjlVkl‾=(UU∗−VV∗)jk=δjk. Likewise [aj′,ak′]=∑l(UjlVkl−VjlUkl)=(UVT−VUT)jk=0. These are finite sums on the common core, so no unbounded product is used outside its domain.

2.1F1F2step 1.1algebra

Substitute a=(Q+iP)/2ℏ and a∗=(Q−iP)/2ℏ into Ua+Va∗. Its real quadrature part is Re⁡(U+V)Q−Im⁡(U−V)P and its imaginary part is Im⁡(U+V)Q+Re⁡(U−V)P. These two blocks form SgRg. Since step 1.1 gives the canonical commutators for these transformed quadratures, bilinearity yields [(SgRg)j,(SgRg)k]=iℏ(SgJ0SgT)jk=iℏ(J0)jk. Here [Rg,j,Rg,k]=iℏ(J0)jk follows from Rg=ΠR and J0=ΠJΠT. Since ℏ>0, the displayed identity implies SgJ0SgT=J0. Taking determinants shows (det⁡Sg)2=1, so Sg is invertible. Inverting this identity and using J0−1=−J0 gives SgTJ0Sg=J0, as required.

3.1F1F3F4step 2.1algebra∎

Use the permutation Π defined in the Statement and set Si=ΠTSgΠ. Since ΠTΠ=I and J0=ΠJΠT, step 2.1 gives SiTJSi=J, so Si is symplectic in interleaved order. Apply [F3] to Si and transport its unitary to Fock by [F4]. For every grouped label w, the definition of Wg gives M∗Wg(w)M=W(SiTΠTw)=W(ΠTSgTw)=Wg(SgTw). Likewise, on the transported Schwartz core, M∗RgM=ΠM∗RM=ΠSiR=SgRg. The Weyl covariance holds on all Fock space because each Weyl operator and the implementer are bounded. The complex recombination in step 2.1 gives M∗aM=a′. Each generator in [F3] preserves Schwartz space, so MΩ lies in that core. Therefore, using ajΩ=0 and aj′Ω=∑kVjkak∗Ω, one has ∑j∥ajMΩ∥2=∑j∥Maj′Ω∥2=∑j,k∣Vjk∣2=tr⁡(VV∗). The equality is finite and proves the claimed finite mean number. No step passes to infinitely many modes.

LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

Positive definite Williamson normal form

Statement

Let r≥1, ℏ>0, and J=⨁j=1r(01−10). For every real symmetric positive definite 2r×2r matrix V, there are an interleaved symplectic matrix S (STJS=J) and positive numbers ν1,…,νr such that V=SDST,D=diag⁡(ν1,ν1,…,νr,νr). Moreover, V+iℏJ/2⪰0⟺νj≥ℏ/2 for every j. Here A⪰0 means the Hermitian matrix A has nonnegative quadratic form on every complex vector.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: r≥1, ℏ>0, and a real symmetric positive definite V∈M2r(R).

[A1]

The dimension is finite and positive, the action scale satisfies ℏ>0, and V=VT obeys xTVx>0 for every nonzero real x.

[F1]

In finite-dimensional Euclidean space, a real symmetric matrix has an orthonormal eigenbasis: maximize its Rayleigh quotient on the compact unit sphere to obtain an eigenvector, restrict to its invariant orthogonal complement, and induct on dimension. A positive definite matrix therefore has a real symmetric positive definite square root.

[F2]

The local convention uses interleaved quadrature order with J=⊕j(01−10) (Finite-mode quadratures and symplectic data); this item tests positivity of the Hermitian matrix V+iℏJ/2 defined in its Statement.

Proof

1.1givenA1F1algebra

First diagonalize V by the Rayleigh-quotient induction in [F1]: a maximizer of xTVx on the unit sphere is an eigenvector, because the derivative at zero of the quotient at e+tv vanishes for every v⊥e; the orthogonal complement is invariant under a symmetric matrix, so induction gives an orthonormal eigenbasis. Positivity makes each eigenvalue positive, and replacing it by its positive square root constructs the real symmetric positive definite M=V1/2. Now let K=MJM. Then KT=−K, and K is invertible because both M and J are. The matrix B=−K2=KTK is real symmetric positive definite. Apply the same Rayleigh-quotient argument to B to choose a unit eigenvector e with eigenvalue ν2>0 and put f=−Ke/ν. Since ∥Ke∥2=eTBe=ν2, f is unit; since K is skew, eTf=0. Also Ke=−νf and Kf=−K2e/ν=νe. Thus in the orthonormal ordered pair (e,f), (eTKeeTKffTKefTKf)=(0ν−ν0). For any x orthogonal to both e,f, skew-symmetry gives eTKx=−(Ke)Tx=νfTx=0 and fTKx=−(Kf)Tx=−νeTx=0, so their orthogonal complement is K-invariant. Repeating the argument on this complement gives an orthogonal matrix O and positive νj with OTKO=JD, where D=diag⁡(ν1,ν1,…,νr,νr).

2.1F2step 1.1algebra

Set S=MOD−1/2. Then SDST=MOD−1/2DD−1/2OTM=M2=V, and STJS=D−1/2OTMJMOD−1/2=D−1/2(JD)D−1/2=J, because D commutes with J. This proves the Williamson factorization and symplecticity of S.

3.1step 2.1algebra∎

For symplectic S, congruence by S−1 maps V+iℏJ/2 to D+iℏJ/2, since S−1JS−T=J. In each (Qj,Pj) block the latter matrix is (νjiℏ/2−iℏ/2νj), whose eigenvalues are νj+ℏ/2 and νj−ℏ/2. Congruence by an invertible matrix preserves nonnegative quadratic forms, so the full matrix is positive semidefinite exactly when every νj≥ℏ/2.

LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

Schwartz density in the joint quadrature graph norm

Statement

Assume Countable Choice, let r≥1 and ℏ>0, and use the Schrödinger quadratures Qjf=ℏxjf on D(Qj)={f:xjf∈L2} and Pj=F2−1M2πℏ ξjF2, where F2 is the unitary 2π-frequency Fourier transform on L2(Rr) and the multiplier has its maximal L2 domain. Put D={f∈L2(Rr):xjf∈L2(Rr), ∂jf∈L2(Rr) for every j}. For ∥f∥quad:=∥f∥2+∑j=1r(∥xjf∥2+∥∂jf∥2), the Schwartz space S(Rr) is dense in D. The weak derivatives in this definition are taken in the distributional sense and agree with the Fourier-defined momentum domains of the quadratures just defined.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice, finite r≥1, ℏ>0, and f∈D.

[A1]

Countable Choice is the hypothesis of the Fourier–Sobolev and compactly-supported smooth density interfaces (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

[F1]

Under Countable Choice the Fourier transform F2 is unitary (Plancherel theorem). Schwartz space consists of the smooth functions with every seminorm pα,β finite (Schwartz space and its seminorms). The quadratures in the Statement are defined directly here; no AC-dependent representation uniqueness is used.

[F2]

The Fourier characterization of W1,2(Rr) identifies its weak-derivative norm with an equivalent norm requiring f and every ξjf^ in L2; hence f∈D lies in W1,2 (Integer-order W^{k,2} and H^k agree with equivalent norms).

[F3]

For 0<a<b a smooth bump exists that equals 1 on B‾a(0) and has support in Bb(0) (A smooth bump between concentric Euclidean balls).

[F4]

Multiplication by a smooth function obeys the weak Leibniz rule, so ∂j(χf)=χ∂jf+(∂jχ)f (Weak Leibniz rule with a smooth factor).

[F5]

Countable Choice implies that Cc∞(Rr) is dense in W1,2(Rr) (Compactly supported smooth functions are dense in W^{k,p}(R^n)).

[F6]

Dominated convergence applies to the integrable squared tails of f, xjf, and ∂jf (Dominated convergence).

Proof

1.1A1F1F2F3F4F6givenalgebra

Choose χ∈Cc∞(Rr) with 0≤χ≤1, χ=1 on B‾1(0), and support in B2(0) by [F3]. For R≥1 set χR(x)=χ(x/R) and fR=χRf. Then ∣∂jχR∣≤C/R. By [F4], fR∈W1,2 and ∂j(fR−f)=(χR−1)∂jf+(∂jχR)f. The first terms in fR−f, xj(fR−f), and (χR−1)∂jf tend to zero in L2 by dominated convergence [F6], since χR→1 pointwise and ∣χR−1∣≤1. The remaining derivative term has norm at most C∥f∥2/R. Thus ∥fR−f∥quad→0.

2.1A1F3F4F5step 1.1givenalgebra∎

Fix R so the preceding error is below ε/2. The function fR is supported in B‾2R(0). By [F5], choose ϕ∈Cc∞(Rr) with ∥ϕ−fR∥W1,2 as small as needed. Choose θ∈Cc∞ equal to 1 on B‾2R(0) and supported in B2R+2(0) by [F3], and put g=θϕ. Since θfR=fR, the weak product rule [F4] gives g−fR=θ(ϕ−fR),∂j(g−fR)=θ∂j(ϕ−fR)+(∂jθ)(ϕ−fR). The bounded derivatives of θ make the W1,2 norm of g−fR at most a fixed constant times ∥ϕ−fR∥W1,2. Both g and fR are supported in B‾2R+2(0), so ∥xj(g−fR)∥2≤(2R+2)∥g−fR∥2. Choose ϕ close enough that ∥g−fR∥quad<ε/2. Then g∈Cc∞⊂S and ∥g−f∥quad<ε by step 1.1. Since f and ε>0 were arbitrary, S(Rr) is dense in D.

TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

Gaussian covariance and uncertainty

Statement

Assume AC, r≥1, ℏ>0, and the quadrature, density-operator, characteristic-function, and covariance definitions of Finite-mode quadratures and symplectic data. For every density operator with finite quadrature second moments, V+iℏJ/2⪰0. If S is symplectic and MS is any individual implementer with MS∗RMS=SR on the quadrature domains, then for ρS=MSρMS∗ its mean and covariance are dS=Sd,VS=SVST, and χρS(z)=χρ(STz). Conversely, for every real vector d∈R2r and real symmetric matrix V, the function χ(z)=exp⁡ ⁣(izTd−12zTVz) is the Weyl characteristic function of a finite-mode density operator if and only if V+iℏJ/2⪰0. This is a conditional mathematical existence result for the stated finite-mode model; it is not an experimental claim.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, finite r≥1, ℏ>0, the self-adjoint quadratures and Weyl system, and a density operator with the finite second-moment condition. Inner products are linear in the first argument as in Finite-mode quadratures and symplectic data.

[A1]

AC is adopted for the density spectral expansion and the finite-dimensional Stone–von Neumann interface; it supplies the Countable Choice hypothesis of the spectral expansion (The Axiom of Choice, The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

[A2]

The input density operator has finite quadrature second moments in the definition Finite-mode quadratures and symplectic data.

[F1]

A density operator has an orthonormal eigen-expansion ρ=∑nwn∣ψn⟩⟨ψn∣ with wn>0 and ∑nwn=1; the definitions of d,V are the convergent weighted quadrature forms in that expansion (Density operators and scalar spectral probability, Finite-mode quadratures and symplectic data).

[F2]

Schwartz functions are dense in the joint quadrature graph norm ∥f∥2+∑j(∥xjf∥2+∥∂jf∥2) (Schwartz density in the joint quadrature graph norm); the quadrature CCR hold on this core (Finite-mode quadratures and symplectic data).

[F3]

Every finite symplectic map has an individual unitary implementer, Schwartz space is invariant under its quadratic generator factors, and the bounded Weyl covariance holds everywhere (Finite symplectic implementation by quadratic generators).

[F4]

The finite Bogoliubov theorem supplies the same Weyl and quadrature covariance for transformations expressed by finite matrices U,V obeying the displayed CCR identities. Explicitly, if Π sends interleaved coordinates to grouped coordinates and Sg is that theorem's grouped matrix, the matrix used with R,J,W here is S=ΠTSgΠ: M∗RM=SR and M∗W(z)M=W(STz) (Finite Bogoliubov implementability).

[F5]

Every real symmetric positive definite V has a symplectic Williamson factorization V=SDST, and V+iℏJ/2⪰0 is equivalent to all diagonal entries νj of D being at least ℏ/2 (Positive definite Williamson normal form).

[F6]

Dominated convergence applies to measurable pointwise-convergent functions dominated in absolute value by one integrable function; this includes uniformly bounded functions on a probability space (Dominated convergence).

[F7]

Every strongly continuous one-parameter unitary group has a unique self-adjoint generator, characterized by differentiability at zero (Stone's theorem: unitary groups and self-adjoint generators).

[F8]

On one-mode Fock space, a∣m⟩=m ∣m−1⟩, a∗∣m⟩=m+1 ∣m+1⟩, and Q=ℏ/2(a+a∗), P=−iℏ/2(a−a∗) (Finite-mode Fock to Schrödinger identification, Creation contraction bounds, Finite-mode quadratures and symplectic data).

[F9]

For t>0 and ξ∈R, the imported 2π-frequency Fourier transform satisfies ∫Re−πty2e−2πiyξ dy=t−1/2e−πξ2/t, and every polynomial times a positive real Gaussian is integrable (Euclidean Gaussian transform with the 2π normalization). Consequently, for α>0 and β∈R, setting t=α/π and ξ=−β/(2π) gives ∫Re−αy2+iβy dy=πα e−β2/(4α).

[F10]

Integration by parts holds on finite intervals and on the real line when the derivative products are integrable and the boundary product vanishes; xme−ax→0 as x→+∞ for every fixed integer m≥0 and a>0 (Complex integration by parts on intervals and decaying lines, The exponential dominates every fixed nonnegative integer power at +∞).

[F11]

For Borel g:R2→[0,∞], planar Lebesgue measure in polar coordinates is r dr dσ(ω) on S1; the measure is defined by σ(E)=2λ2({rω:ω∈E,0<r≤1}). For every planar rotation Rθ, this definition and ∣det⁡Rθ∣=1 give σ(RθE)=σ(E) by the linear change-of-variables theorem. Also σ(S1)=2λ2({x:0<∣x∣≤1})=2π: the omitted origin is null, and the closed unit disk has area V2(1)=π (The polar surface set function on the unit sphere, Polar coordinates decompose Lebesgue measure into r^{n-1} dr d sigma, A linear map T of Rn sends Lebesgue measurable sets to Lebesgue measurable sets, with λn(T[E])=∣det⁡T∣ λn(E) when T is invertible and T[E] Lebesgue null when it is not, The closed form for the volume of the unit n-ball).

[F12]

Absolutely integrable functions on the Euclidean product R2 may be integrated in either coordinate order; the product Gaussian integrands below are absolutely integrable by [F9] (Fubini's theorem for L^1 functions on a sigma-finite product).

[F13]

For nonnegative measurable functions on any measure space, the integral of their pointwise lower limit is at most the lower limit of their integrals (Fatou's lemma). Under AC, a self-adjoint operator A has a spectral PVM with D(A)={ψ:∫λ2 dEA,ψ<∞} (Spectral theorem for unbounded self-adjoint operators (PVM form)). The density spectral probability is the positive weighted sum of these scalar measures (Density operators and scalar spectral probability).

Proof

1.1A1A2F1F2algebra

Write Xj=Rj−djI and Gjk=∑nwn⟨Xjψn,Xkψn⟩. The series converge absolutely by Cauchy–Schwarz and the second-moment bounds. On compactly supported smooth functions, integration by parts gives ⟨Rjf,Rkf⟩−⟨Rkf,Rjf⟩=−iℏJjk∥f∥2. For the same-mode Qj,Pj pair, this is iℏ∫xj∂j∣f∣2=−iℏ∥f∥2 after the vanishing boundary term; distinct coordinate pairs and equal-type pairs give zero. The joint graph-norm density in [F2] extends the identity to each ψn in the common domain. Centering by the real scalars dj does not change the antisymmetric difference. Summing with weights yields G−GT=−iℏJ, while Re⁡G=V by definition; hence G=V−iℏJ/2. For any c∈C2r, ∑nwn∥∑jcjXjψn∥2=c‾ TGTc≥0. Since GT=V+iℏJ/2, the uncertainty matrix is positive semidefinite.

1.2F5algebra

Now suppose the target V+iℏJ/2 is positive semidefinite. For real x, xTVx=x∗(V+iℏJ/2)x≥0, so V is nonnegative. If a nonzero real x had xTVx=0, put H=V+iℏJ/2. For every complex y and real t, positivity gives (x+ty)∗H(x+ty)=2tRe⁡(y∗Hx)+t2y∗Hy≥0. Allowing both signs of t forces Re⁡(y∗Hx)=0; replacing y by iy forces the imaginary part to vanish as well. This holds for every y, so take y=Hx to obtain ∥Hx∥2=0 and hence Hx=0. Its real and imaginary parts give Vx=0 and Jx=0, contradicting invertibility of J. Thus V is positive definite. Apply [F5] to obtain V=SDST with D=diag⁡(ν1,ν1,…,νr,νr) and νj≥ℏ/2.

1.3F6F8F9F10F11F12algebra

For one mode and nˉ≥0, set η=nˉ1+nˉ,ρnˉ=(1−η)∑m=0∞ηm∣m⟩⟨m∣, with ρ0=∣0⟩⟨0∣. The geometric series makes this a positive trace-class operator of trace one. For nˉ>0, define ∣α⟩=e−∣α∣2/2∑m=0∞αmm!∣m⟩. Its norm is one by the exponential series. The vector ψα:=W(q0,p0)g0, with α=ℏ/2(−p0+iq0), is a scalar phase times ∣α⟩: the differential formula gives aψ=αψ, and comparing coefficients in the complete number basis gives the displayed series up to one constant phase. In Schrödinger coordinates ψα(x)=π−1/4eiℏq0(x+ℏp0/2)e−(x+ℏp0)2/2. Set y=x+ℏp0+ℏp/2. In ⟨W(q,p)ψα,ψα⟩, the Gaussian factor is e−y2−ℏp2/4 and the phase is ℏqy−ℏqp0+ℏq0p. For α0>0 and real β, [F9] gives ∫Re−α0y2+iβy dy=πα0e−β2/(4α0) by the explicit substitutions t=α0/π and ξ=−β/(2π) in the supplier's 2π-frequency formula. Taking α0=1 and β=ℏq gives the normalized factor π−1/2∫e−y2+iℏqy dy=e−ℏq2/4. Therefore, for u=Re⁡α and v=Im⁡α, ⟨W(q,p)ψα,ψα⟩=exp⁡ ⁣(i2ℏ(qu+pv)−ℏ4(q2+p2)). The phase is the mean d=(2ℏu,2ℏv). The geometric weights have mean occupation ∑mm(1−η)ηm=η/(1−η)=nˉ. For a number vector, Q∣m⟩=ℏ/2(m+1∣m+1⟩+m∣m−1⟩), and P∣m⟩=−iℏ/2(m∣m−1⟩−m+1∣m+1⟩) by [F8]. Orthogonality of number vectors gives zero means and ⟨m,Q2m⟩=⟨m,P2m⟩=ℏ(m+1/2). Also QP+PQ=−iℏ(a2−(a∗)2), whose diagonal matrix entries vanish because a2 and (a∗)2 change number by two. Thus the diagonal state has zero symmetrized cross covariance. Summing against the geometric weights gives ⟨Q2⟩=⟨P2⟩=ℏ2(2nˉ+1)=ν. Thus its quadrature second moments are finite and its covariance is νI2. The probability density (πnˉ)−1e−(u2+v2)/nˉ on the complex plane is normalized because [F9] at zero frequency gives ∫Re−u2/nˉdu=πnˉ in each coordinate, and [F12] factors the absolutely integrable product integral. By [F12] and two applications of [F9] with α0=1/nˉ, βu=2ℏq and βv=2ℏp, its characteristic factor is ∫Ce−∣α∣2/nˉπnˉei2ℏ(qu+pv) du dv=e−ℏnˉ(q2+p2)/2. To identify the mixture with ρnˉ, the (m,n) matrix entry of ∣α⟩⟨α∣ is e−∣α∣2αmαˉn/m!n! by the coherent-state series. Under a planar rotation α↦eiθα, Lebesgue measure and the radial density are invariant by [F11], while αmαˉn gains the factor ei(m−n)θ; choosing θ with this factor unequal to 1 shows that every off-diagonal entry vanishes. For m=n, the polar formula [F11] and σ(S1)=2π give ∫C∣α∣2me−a∣α∣2 du dv=2π∫0∞r2m+1e−ar2 dr=π∫0∞xme−ax dx, where x=r2. For a>0, the last integral is m!/am+1: its value at m=0 is 1/a, and integration by parts on [0,R] followed by R→∞ gives Im(a)=(m/a)Im−1(a); the boundary term vanishes by [F10]. Thus the mth diagonal entry of the mixture is 1πnˉm!∫C∣α∣2me−(1+1/nˉ)∣α∣2 du dv=nˉm(1+nˉ)m+1=(1−η)ηm. Let PK=∑m=0K∣m⟩⟨m∣ and integrate the finite-rank operators PK∣α⟩⟨α∣PK. Their diagonal entries just computed give ∑m=0K(1−η)ηm∣m⟩⟨m∣, which converges in trace norm to ρnˉ. Also PK∣α⟩→∣α⟩ in norm for each α, and ∣⟨W(q,p)PKα,PKα⟩∣≤1. Dominated convergence [F6] therefore passes the characteristic function through the mixture. Multiplying the two scaled Gaussian Fourier factors just computed by the vacuum factor in the coherent formula gives tr⁡(ρnˉW(q,p))=e−ℏ(2nˉ+1)(q2+p2)/4=e−ν(q2+p2)/2,ν=ℏ(nˉ+1/2). For nˉ=0, the same formula and covariance follow from [F9] with α0=1 and β=ℏq (and the p coordinate).

2.1F1F2F3F4F7step 1.1algebra

Let MS be an implementer from [F3] and set ρS=MSρMS∗. The Weyl identity and cyclicity of trace against a bounded operator give χρS(z)=tr⁡(ρMS∗W(z)MS)=χρ(STz). For a coordinate vector ej, the explicit Weyl formula gives W(tej)=eitRj. Therefore MS∗eitRjMS=W(tSTej); its derivative on Schwartz functions at zero is i∑kSjkRk. By [F7], the two strongly continuous groups have unique self-adjoint generators, so MS∗RjMS=∑kSjkRk‾. The left side has Schwartz as a core because every generator unitary in [F3] preserves Schwartz. By [F2], Schwartz is dense in the joint quadrature graph norm, so every vector with all quadrature second moments lies in the domain of these finite sums and the identity acts there as written. Applying it to the eigenvectors of ρ and using the absolutely convergent form sums in [F1] gives dS=Sd and VS=SVST. For transformations arising from finite Bogoliubov matrices, these are exactly the core and Weyl interfaces of [F4].

3.1F1F2F3F6F7F13step 1.1step 2.1algebra

For necessity in the converse, suppose a density operator ρ has the displayed Gaussian characteristic function with parameters d,V, without initially assuming moment bounds. Let Ej be the spectral PVM of Rj and μj(B)=tr⁡(ρEj(B)). Then ∫eitλ dμj(λ)=χ(tej). With tn=1/n, [F13] gives 12∫λ2 dμj≤lim inf⁡n→∞∫1−cos⁡(tnλ)tn2 dμj=dj2+Vjj2<∞. For an orthonormal density expansion with weights wn>0, positivity and the definition of the nonnegative integral identify this second moment with ∑nwn∫λ2 dEj,ψn. The spectral domain formula [F13] therefore places each ψn in D(Rj) and gives ∑nwn∥Rjψn∥2<∞. Thus the hypotheses of step 1.1 hold. To identify the resulting moment parameters with the prescribed d,V, fix real z and let Az be the self-adjoint generator of t↦W(tz). For z≠0, extend z to a symplectic basis (choose a vector with nonzero pairing, normalize it, then induct in its symplectic orthogonal complement); [F3] and the generator argument of step 2.1 show that Az has Schwartz core and equals ∑jzjRj on the joint domain. The case z=0 is the zero generator. The joint-domain moment bounds make ∑nwn∥Azψn∥2 finite. In its scalar spectral probability, the bounds ∣sin⁡(tλ)/t∣≤∣λ∣ and 0≤(1−cos⁡(tλ))/t2≤λ2/2 permit dominated convergence. Comparing with χ(tz) gives ⟨Az⟩=zTd and ⟨Az2⟩=(zTd)2+zTVz, where the second moment denotes the spectral quadratic form. These are also the directional mean and covariance forms of the now finite-moment state, so equality for every real z identifies its mean and real symmetric covariance with d,V. Step 1.1 yields V+iℏJ/2⪰0, proving necessity for every density operator, not just those initially assumed to have finite moments.

4.1F3F5F6step 2.1step 1.2step 1.3algebra∎

Put nˉj=νj/ℏ−1/2≥0 and take the finite tensor product of the one-mode states ρnˉj. In the occupation basis it is positive trace class with trace one, and its characteristic function is the product of the one-mode functions from step 1.3, namely exp⁡(−zTDz/2). Conjugate this product state by an implementer MS from [F3]; step 2.1 gives characteristic function exp⁡(−zTSDSTz/2)=exp⁡(−zTVz/2). Finally set z0=Jd/ℏ and conjugate by the Weyl unitary W(z0). The Weyl commutation relation yields W(z0)∗W(z)W(z0)=eiℏz0TJzW(z)=eizTdW(z), because d=−ℏJz0. The resulting unitary conjugate of the product thermal state is positive, trace class and trace one, and has exactly the target characteristic function. This proves sufficiency and completes the finite-mode equivalence. No infinite-mode inference is used.

5 · Examples, experiments and counterexamples

None yet.

Sources