Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

✓ 1 result · all verified · 1 also independently AI-judged
Every result on this page is machine-checked by a proof checker and read in full and owner-audited; the judge is an additional, independent cross-model AI review of the proofs; all 1 also cleared it.

Projective Perverse Hard Lefschetz And Decomposition Examples

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

Objective. This companion page checks the decomposition statement of Compact smooth projective pushforwards have semisimple perverse cohomology in characteristic zero on the smallest projective family: the constant map f:Pn→pt. On a point the middle-perverse heart is the category of finite-dimensional vector spaces in ordinary degree zero, and the cellular decomposition of Pn with one cell in each dimension 0,2,…,2n computes H2j(Pn;k)=k and no other cohomology, so the perverse splitting of Rf∗k[n] reads Rf∗k[n]≅⨁j=0nk[n−2j], with one copy of k in each degree −n,−n+2,…,n and the case n=0 giving the single summand k.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

None yet.

5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)Open item page →

Perverse decomposition of projective space over a point

Example

Assume the Axiom of Choice as inherited from the cited geometry suppliers. Let f:Pn→pt. In the perverse category on a point, perversity equals the ordinary cohomological t-structure. For characteristic-zero k, Rf∗k[n] has one copy of k in each degree −n,−n+2,…,n and is the finite sum ⨁j=0nk[n−2j].

Verification

Given: The morphism f:Pn→pt with its standard projective-space structure, a characteristic-zero coefficient field k, and the Axiom of Choice inherited from the cited geometry suppliers.

[F1] Cellular cochains compute cohomology with the constant coefficient system k, by Cellular cochains compute cohomology with local coefficients.

[F2] The support and cosupport bounds on the sole zero-dimensional stratum define the ordinary t-structure, by Ordinary middle perverse t structure, recollement and intersection complexes.

[F3] The finite perverse splitting for this smooth projective source is Compact smooth projective pushforwards have semisimple perverse cohomology in characteristic zero.

1.1givenF1algebra

The standard characteristic maps exhibit the cellular filtration P0⊂P1⊂⋯⊂Pn with exactly one real cell in each dimension 0,2,…,2n: the map from the closed unit ball in Cj sending w to [w:1−∥w∥2] has interior mapping homeomorphically onto the last-coordinate affine chart and boundary mapping onto Pj−1. Adjacent cellular groups sit in degrees of opposite parity, so the cellular differential vanishes and Cellular cochains compute cohomology with local coefficients gives H2j(Pn;k)=k for 0≤j≤n and Hm(Pn;k)=0 for all other m.

2.1F2F3step 1.1algebra∎

On a point the perverse support and cosupport inequalities are Hq=0 for q>0 and for q<0, respectively, by Ordinary middle perverse t structure, recollement and intersection complexes. Thus the perverse t-structure equals the ordinary one, its heart consists of finite-dimensional k-vector spaces in degree zero, and pHi(Rf∗k[n])=Hn+i(Pn;k). Since Pn is smooth projective and f is projective, Compact smooth projective pushforwards have semisimple perverse cohomology in characteristic zero supplies the finite splitting Rf∗k[n]≅⨁ipHi(Rf∗k[n])[−i]. Substituting step 1.1 gives Rf∗k[n]≅⨁j=0nk[n−2j], with a simple copy of k exactly in degrees −n,−n+2,…,n. For n=0 this is the single summand k; an empty source is outside the example.

Sources